| 2 Hadiths


Hadith
2684
Sa’eed ibn Jubayr said:
A Jew from Al-Heerah asked me which one of the two periods Prophet Moosaa (Moses) completed. I said, "I do not know, (but wait) till I see the most learned Arab and inquire him about it." So, I went to Ibn ‘Abbaas (may Allah be pleased with them) and asked him. He (may Allah be pleased with him) replied, "Prophet Moosaa completed the longer and better period." Ibn ‘Abbaas (may Allah be pleased with them) added, "No doubt, a Messenger of Allah always does what he says."
.

Commentary :
The Prophets and Messengers of Allah were endowed with the most perfect moral characters and were the most truthful among all people. The Quran made mention of Prophet Moosaa, given his exemplary resolve and patience.
In this hadeeth, the Taabi’ee (a Muslim who saw at least one of the Companions)Sa’eed ibn Jubayr related that a Jew from the people of Al-Heerah, which was an ancient city in Iraq near Kufa, and was the capital of many dynasties, asked himwhich one of the two periods Prophet Moosaa (Moses) completed, referring to the ayah that reads (what means): {He said, "Indeed, I wish to wed you one of these, my two daughters, on [the condition] that you serve me for eight years; but if you complete ten, it will be [as a favor] from you.} [Quran 28:27]. The ayah means that Prophet Moosaa was offered to marry the man’s daughter, and her dower was to work for him for eight years, and if he chose to work for him from ten years instead, it would be a favor and not required of him. Sa’eed told him that he did not know which period Prophet Moosaa completed, and told him that he would ask the well-ayahd Arab scholar, meaning, Ibn ‘Abbaas (may Allah be pleased with them), in Makkah. Ibn ‘Abbaas (may Allah be pleased with them) informed him that Prophet Moosaa completed ten years. He (may Allah be pleased with them) added: “No doubt, a Messenger of Allah always does what he says.” This applies to all Messengers of Allah, and foremostly Prophet Moosaa, because they were talking about him in particular. This is because the Prophets of Allah were endowed with the most perfect moral characters which entailed fulfilling their promises.
The hadeeth urges the fulfillment of promises.
.

2685
 ‘Ubaydullaah ibn ‘Abdullah ibn ‘Utbah narrated that Ibn ‘Abbaas (may Allah be pleased with them) said, "O Muslims! How do you ask the People of the Scriptures, though your Book (i.e., the Quran) which was revealed to His Prophet ﷺ is the most recent divine revelation and you recite it, and it has not been distorted? Allah, Exalted is He, has revealed to you that the People of the Scriptures have changed and distorted what had been revealed to them with their own hands and said (regarding their changed Scriptures): This is from Allah, in order to get some worldly benefit thereby." Ibn ‘Abbaas (may Allah be pleased with them) added: "Is not the knowledge revealed to you sufficient to you, and you do not need to ask them about anything? By Allah, I have never seen any one of them asking you about what has been revealed to you!"
.

Commentary :
The Prophet ﷺ keenly instilled the correct Islamic creed within the hearts and minds of his Companions (may Allah be pleased with them), and warned them against following the path of the previous nations, and the Companions (may Allah be pleased with them) did the same with the following Muslim generation.
In this hadeeth, the Taabi’ee (a Muslim who saw at least one of the Companions) ‘Ubaydullaah ibn ‘Abdullah ibn ‘Utbah narrated that ‘Abdullah ibn ‘Abbaas (may Allah be pleased with them) addressed people once, rebuking and warning them against asking the People of the Scriptures, i.e., Jews and Christians, regarding some religious matters that seemed similar to what had been revealed to them, or regarding the topics and stories addressed in their Scriptures. He (may Allah be pleased with him) stated that the reason for the prohibition in this regard was that the Quran, which was revealed by Allah, Exalted is He, to His Prophet ﷺ, is the most recent divine revelation. He (may Allah be pleased with him) said, “… and you recite it,” meaning that Muslims are enjoined to recite the Quran as an act of worship, “and it has not been distorted?” This means that the Quran was not changed like the previous heavenly books revealed to the People of the Scriptures. They “have changed and distorted what had been revealed to them with their own hands,” including the Torah that was revealed to the Jews, and the Gospel that was revealed to the Christians, “and they have said (regarding their changed Scriptures): ‘This is from Allah, in order to get some worldly benefit thereby.’" They traded their Scriptures for an insignificantly small price, although they (i.e., the Scriptures) are worth the whole worldly life! He (may Allah be pleased with him) rebuked them for it since Allah, Exalted is He, blessed Muslims with the Quran in which He imparted to them adequate knowledge that suffices them, and they do not need to ask the People of the Scriptures about anything!
Ibn ‘Abbaas (may Allah be pleased with them) added: "Is not the knowledge revealed to you sufficient to you, and you do not need to ask them about anything?” His statement, “By Allah, I have never seen any one of them asking about what has been revealed to you,” means that they did not perceive Muslims as worthy of their questions, despite their trustworthiness and competence (i.e., since Muslims are endowed with the ultimate divine knowledge in the Quran). He (may Allah be pleased with him) meant to say, ‘How could you trust them with answering your questions, although Allah, Exalted is He, informed you in the Quran of their lies, distortion of the previous Scriptures,and even attributing lies to Him?” It is also possible that the People of the Scriptures did not have prescribed religious celebrations and therefore did not need to ask about them!
.

2687
Umm Al-‘Alaa’ (may Allah be pleased with her) narrated that when the Ansaar drew lots as to whom of the emigrants should dwell with whom of the Ansaar, the name of ‘Uthmaan ibn Madh‘oon came out (to be in their lot). Umm Al-‘Alaa’ (may Allah be pleased with her) further said, "‘Uthmaan stayed with us, and we nursed him when he got sick, but he died. We shrouded him in his clothes, and Allah's Messenger ﷺ came to our house and I said, (addressing the dead ‘Uthmaan), 'O Aboo Al-Saa’ib! May Allah be merciful to you. I testify that Allah, Exalted is He, has blessed you.' The Prophet ﷺ said to me, "How do you know that Allah has blessed him?" I replied, 'I do not know, O Allah's Messengerﷺ! May my parents be sacrificed for you!' Allah's Messengerﷺ said, 'As regards ‘Uthmaan, by Allah, he has died and I really wish him every good, yet, by Allah, although I am Allah's Messenger, I do not know what will be done to him!' Thereupon, Umm Al-‘Alaa’ added, 'By Allah, I shall never attest the piety of anybody afterward! What Allah's Messenger ﷺ said made me sad." Umm Al-‘Alaa’ (may Allah be pleased with her) further said, "Once, I slept and saw in a dream, a flowing stream for ‘Uthmaan. So, I went to Allah's Messengerﷺ and told him of it, he ﷺ said, 'That is (the symbol of) his good deeds."
.

Commentary :
The Prophet ﷺ keenly instilled within his Companions (may Allah be pleased with them) the mindfulness of Allah, Exalted is He, and refrainment from making assumptions about people’s fate in the Hereafter, as to whether they would be admitted to Paradise or thrown into Hellfire. Human beings must not play God, judge and pass sentences on people as they wish. Rather, we are enjoined to judge people according to what is apparent, and bear in mind that only Allah, Exalted is He, knows their true inward characters and what is hidden in their hearts (and He shall reward or punish them accordingly).
This hadeeth emphasizes this meaning. Umm Al-‘Alaa’ (may Allah be pleased with her) was a woman from the Ansaar who had given the Bay‘ah (i.e., pledge of allegiance) to the Prophet, making a covenant with him to adhere to Islam and refrain from associating partners with Allah and from committing immoral acts.She narrated that when the Ansaar drew lots as to whom of the emigrants should dwell with whom of the Ansaar, the name of ‘Uthmaan ibn Madh‘oon came out (to be in their lot). The emigrants had no place to live in Al-Madeenah and were hosted by their fellow Muslim brothers from the Ansaar. Umm Al-‘Alaa’ (may Allah be pleased with her) further said, "‘Uthmaan stayed with us, and we nursed him when he got sick, but he died. We shrouded him in his clothes, and Allah's Messenger ﷺ came to our house and I said, (addressing the dead ‘Uthmaan), 'O Aboo Al-Saa’ib,’ which was his nickname, ‘May Allah be merciful to you. I testify that Allah, Exalted is He, has blessed you.'” Another version of the hadeeth, compiled in Musnad Ahmad, on the authority of Ibn ‘Abbaas (may Allah be pleased with them), reads: “Congratulations on entering Paradise!” She (may Allah be pleased with her) decisively judged him as one of the people of Paradise, based on her knowledge of his devotion in worship and other good qualities. According to the version recorded by Ahmad, the Prophet ﷺ gave her a disapproving look, because she had decisively judged ‘Uthmaan (may Allah be pleased with him) as one of the People of Paradise, which implies impoliteness with Allah, Exalted is He, by claiming the knowledge of the unseen that is exclusive to Him! None knows the ultimate fate of people in the Hereafter except Allah, Exalted is He. Thereupon, the Prophet ﷺ said to her, edifying her on that meaning, "How do you know that Allah has blessed him?" She (may Allah be pleased with her) replied, 'I do not know, O Allah's Messengerﷺ! May my parents be sacrificed for you!' The Prophet ﷺ said, 'As regards ‘Uthmaan, by Allah, he has died and I really wish him every good, yet, by Allah, although I am Allah's Messenger, I do not know what will be done to him!' In the version reported by Al-Bukhaaree, the Prophet ﷺ said: “… although I am Allah's Messenger, I do not know what will be done to me,” meaning that he ﷺ did not know with certainty what shall happen to him in the Hereafter except for what Allah, Exalted is He, had informed him of.
Umm Al-‘Alaa’ (may Allah be pleased with her) said, 'By Allah, I shall never attest the piety of anybody afterward,” meaning that she would never decisively attest the righteousness of any person and that he would enter Paradise expect those who were named by the Prophet ﷺ among the people of Paradise. What she did and what the Prophet ﷺ said made her sad. Umm Al-‘Alaa’ (may Allah be pleased with her) further said, "Once, I slept and saw in a dream, a flowing stream for ‘Uthmaan. So, I went to Allah's Messengerﷺ and told him of it, and he ﷺ said, 'That is (the symbol of) his good deeds.‘ He ﷺ interpreted the flowing stream in the vision as to refer to his good deeds, because all people’s good deeds come to an end by their death except the one who dies while partaking in Jihaad as Muraabit (i.e., a guard at frontier outposts in support of Allah's Cause); his good deeds continue to grow and increase unto the Day of Judgment. ‘Uthmaan (may Allah be pleased with him) died as an emigrate for the sake of Allah, fleeing religious persecution to worship his Lord freely, and Muraabit in support of the Cause of Allah, Exalted is He.
It has been reported on the authority of the Prophet ﷺthat which urges Muslims to testify to the righteousness and piety of a dead person and mention his good qualities and deeds, provided that one should not decisively state that such a person shall be in Paradise or Hellfire. It was narrated on the authority of ‘Umar ibn Al-Khattaab (may Allah be pleased with him), and recorded by Al-Bukhaaree, that the Prophet ﷺ said: “If four people testify to the righteousness of a (dead) Muslim, Allah, Exalted is He, will grant him Paradise." The Companions (may Allah be pleased with them) (eagerly) asked, "If three people testify to his righteousness (will he earn the same reward)?" He ﷺ replied, "Even three." They further asked, "What about two?" He ﷺ replied, "Even two."
The hadeeth aims to edify Muslims on the relevant prohibition; we are enjoined to refrain from playing God and decisively judging anyone’s fate in the Hereafter without knowledge. This is because only Allah, Exalted is He, will hold people accountable on the Day of Resurrection and shall reward or punish them accordingly. Moreover, we do not have knowledge of a dead person’s inward character and what he had harbored in his heart. Rather, we are enjoined to settle for testifying to the dead person’s righteousness by saying, ‘I think that (s)he was a good and righteous person, and only Allah, Exalted is He, knows best,’ or the like. 
.

2691
Narrated Anas (may Allah be pleased with him):
It was said to the Prophet ﷺ, "Would you, please, go to ‘Abdullah ibn Ubayy?" So, the Prophet ﷺwent to him, riding a donkey, and Muslims accompanied him, walking on salty barren land. When the Prophet ﷺreached ‘Abdullah ibn Ubayy, the latter said, "Keep away from me! By Allah, the bad smell of your donkey has harmed me." On that, a man from the Ansaar said (to ‘Abdullah), "By Allah! The smell of the Prophet’s donkey is better than your smell." Thereupon, a man from ‘Abdullah's tribe got angry for ‘Abdullah's sake, and the two men verbally abused each other which caused their friends to get angry and agitated, and the two groups started fighting with palm branches, shoes, and hands. We were informed that the following ayah was revealed (in this regard). Allah, Exalted is He, Says (what means): {And if two factions among the believers should fight, then reconcile between the two.} [Quran 49:9]
.

Commentary :
‘Abdullah ibn Ubayy ibn Salool was one of the leaders and chiefs of the Khazraj tribe. When he was invited to embrace Islam, he converted outwardly only, but harbored disbelief. He was the head of the hypocrites in Al-Madeenah, and nursed hostility against the Prophet ﷺ and Muslims.
In this hadeeth, Narrated Anas (may Allah be pleased with him) that it was said to the Prophet ﷺ, "Would you, please, visit ‘Abdullah ibn Ubayy?" They were asking the Prophet ﷺ to go to ‘Abdullah ibn Ubayy to invite him to Islam, and this took place upon his arrival to Al-Madeenah. TheProphet ﷺwent to him, riding a donkey, and Muslims accompanied him, walking on salty barren land. When the Prophet ﷺreached ‘Abdullah ibn Ubayy, the latter said, "Keep away from me! By Allah, the bad smell of your donkey has harmed me." On that, a man from the Ansaar said (to ‘Abdullah), "By Allah! The smell of the Prophet’s donkey is better than your smell." This Companion (may Allah be pleased with him) retorted to ‘Abadullaah, defending the Prophet ﷺ. Thereupon, a man from ‘Abdullah's tribe got angry for ‘Abdullah's sake, and the two men verbally abused each other, which caused their friends to get angry and agitated,” meaning that the Companions (may Allah be pleased with him) got angry for the sake of the Prophet ﷺ and the friends of Ibn Salool got angry for his sake. The two groups started fighting with palm branches, shoes, and hands. A version of the hadeeth compiled by Al-Bukhaaree and Muslim, reads: “The Prophet ﷺ continued to calm them until they kept silent.” He ﷺ continued to calm them until they stopped fighting. Anas (may Allah be pleased with him) added: “We were informed that the following ayah was revealed (in this regard). Allah, Exalted is He, Says (what means): {And if two factions among the believers should fight, then reconcile between the two.} [Quran 49:9].”
It was argued that this ayah talked specifically about the believers, whereas the incident related in this hadeeth was between the Prophet ﷺ and Ibn Salool before his conversion to Islam. In response, it was said that some of Ibn Salool’s friends and men were believers. It was also said that the statement of Anas (may Allah be pleased with him), ‘We were informed,” indicates that that incident was not the actual reason for which this ayah was revealed, and Anas (may Allah be pleased with him) did not explicitly say so. His saying, ‘We were informed,’ does not necessitate that the ayah was revealed on that particular occasion; the chapter in which the concerned ayah is included was revealed in 9 A.H., when the delegations of the Arab tribes came to Al-Madeenah. It is also said that the ayah about the reconciliation between the disputing groups of the believers was revealed earlier than the rest of the chapter, and this would eliminate any problematic aspect.
The hadeeth highlights the unmatched forbearance of the Prophet ﷺ and his endurance of people’s harm.
It also underlines how the believers revered the Prophet ﷺ.
.

2692
Umm Kulthoom bint ‘Uqbah (may Allah be pleased with her) narrated that she heard Allah's Messengerﷺ saying, "He who makes peace between disputing people by inventing good information or saying good things, is not a liar (i.e., he does not bear a sin for it).”
.

Commentary :
The Islamic Laws of Islam urges Muslims to reconcile and make peace between disputing people, even if it had to be achieved through lies, considering the benefits it involvesregarding quarrels and disputing people, by quelling the spirit of enmity and settling their disputes.
In this hadeeth, the Messenger of Allah ﷺ stated that the blameworthy lying, about which stern warnings are reported and for which a punishment is designated as per the laws of Islam does not apply to the situations when a person says what is contrary to the truth to reconcile between disputing people, as encouraged by the enjoined sincerity towards  one’s fellow Muslims. Rather, he ﷺ described such an act as ‘good;’ he ﷺ said: “…inventing good information or saying good things,” meaning that such a person tries to reconcile between the disputing people by saying to one of them, for example, ‘Your friend is praising you and saying good things about you,’ which is untrue.  There is no sin in making this up for the purpose of reconciling between them. A person may need to tell some lies with good intentions to make peace between disputing people.
It is noteworthy that this is allowable provided that it does not involve nor entail denying a person his due rights or helping one take what he is not entitled to take.
The same ruling applies to lying at times of war, meaning to say what helps Muslims appear strong and undermine their enemies’ resolve, even if it is untrue. The same also goes for lying to one’s wife, verbally expressing his affection for her beyond his actual feelings for her to retain her love, ensure the stability of their marriage, and refine her conduct.
It should be noted that the hadeeth does not suggest that these false statements that are contrary to the reality are not labelled as lies as per the laws of Islam; a lie is a lie regardless of the purpose. Rather, it means that a person bears no sin for making up such lies in those specified situations, as a legal concession, enduring the lesser evil to realize the greater good.
The hadeeth urges Muslims to reconcile between disputing people and make peace between them.
.

2697
 ‘Narrated Aa’ishah (may Allah be pleased with her) that Allah's Messengerﷺ said, "If somebody innovates something which has no basis in our religion, such innovation is rejected."
.

Commentary :
Allah, Exalted is He, has completed and perfected the religion of Islam, and has bestowed His perfect grace on His servants, and therefore it is incumbent on Muslims to keenly seek to conform with the will of Allah, Exalted is He, and His Messenger ﷺ (i.e., by compliance with the provisions of Islam), to the best of their abilities, and refrain from introducing religious innovations that have no basis in the Laws of Islam.
Whoever introduces a religious innovation and invents something which has no basis in Islam, such a religious innovation will be rejected. In this hadeeth, the Prophet ﷺ informed us that if anyone introduces a religious innovation that has no basis in the Quran and the Sunnah, does not fall under the heading of a Laws of Islam provision stated therein, or contravenes the provisions of Islam, such an innovation will be rejected, meaning that such an unprescribed act will be declared null and void, and shall not be accepted by Allah, Exalted is He.
This is one of the fundamental principles of Islam, and this hadeeth is one of the examples of the Prophet’s eloquent, aphoristic speech. In this hadeeth, he ﷺ explicitly rejected all religious innovations and unprescribed acts and sayings that have no basis in Islam.
The hadeeth commands Muslims to follow the Sunnah of the Prophet ﷺ and abide by it, and forbids them from introducing any religious innovation.
It is deduced from the hadeeth that the criterion for declaring a given act a religious innovation is having no basis in the Quran or the Sunnah.

.

2699
Al-Baraa’ (may Allah be pleased with him) said:
When the Prophet ﷺ intended to perform ‘Umrah in the month of Dhul-Qi‘dah, the people of Makkah did not let him enter Makkah till he ﷺ settled the matter with them by promising to stay therein for three days only. When the document of the treaty was written, the following was mentioned: 'These are the terms on which Muhammad, Allah's Messengerﷺ agreed (to make peace).' They said, "We will not agree to this, for if we believed that you are Allah's Messenger, we would not prevent you from entering Makkah, but you are Muhammad ibn ‘Abdullah." The Prophet ﷺ said, "I am Allah's Messengerand also Muhammad ibn ‘Abdullah." Then he ﷺ said to ‘Alee (may Allah be pleased with him), "Rub off (the words) 'Allah's Messenger,” but ‘Alee (may Allah be pleased with him) said, "No, by Allah, I will never rub off your name." So, Allah's Messengerﷺtook the document (, rubbed it himself) and wrote instead, 'This is what Muhammad ibn ‘Abdullah has agreed upon: No arms will be brought into Makkah except in their cases, and nobody from the people of Makkah will be allowed to go with him, i.e., the Prophet ﷺeven if he wished to follow him and he (the Prophet ﷺwill not prevent any of his Companions from staying in Makkah if they want to stay.' When the Prophet ﷺ entered Makkah and the specified period expired, the Makkahns went to ‘Alee (may Allah be pleased with him) and said, "Tell your Friend, i.e., the Prophet ﷺ, to leave Makkah; the (agreed-upon) period has passed." So, the Prophet ﷺwent out of Makkah. The daughter of Hamzah ran after them, i.e., the Prophet ﷺand his Companions (may Allah be pleased with them), calling, "O Uncle! O Uncle!" ‘Alee received her and led her by the hand and said to Faatimah (may Allah be pleased with them), "Take your uncle's daughter." Zayd and Ja‘far quarreled about her. ‘Alee (may Allah be pleased with him) said, "I have more right to her as she is my uncle's daughter." Ja‘far (may Allah be pleased with him) said, "She is my uncle's daughter, and her maternal aunt is my wife." Zayd (may Allah be pleased with him) said, "She is my brother's daughter." The Prophet ﷺ judged that she should be placed under the care of her maternal aunt, and said that the maternal aunt was like the mother. He ﷺ then said to ‘Alee (may Allah be pleased with him), "You are from me and I am from you", said to Ja‘far (may Allah be pleased with him), "You resemble me both in terms of moral character and outward appearance", and said to Zayd (may Allah be pleased with him), "You are our brother (in faith) and our freed slave."
.

Commentary :
The Prophet ﷺ endured grievous harm at the hands of the polytheists, who denied him access to the Sacred House. He ﷺ endured their persecution until Allah, Exalted is He, blessed him with triumph over them, and the days proved that he ﷺ was supported by the divine revelation and attested his discretion during the conclusion of the Treay of Al-Hudaybiyah.
In this hadeeth, Al-Baraa’ ibn ‘Aazib (may Allah be pleased with him), narrated that the Prophet ﷺ and his Companions (may Allah be pleased with them) departed Al-Madeenah, and headed towards Makkah with the intention of performing ‘Umrah in the month of Dhul-Qi‘dah, in 6 A.H. However,the people of Makkah did not let them enter Makkah till heﷺmade an agreement with them to stay therein for three days only and return to Al-Madeenah, provided that he ﷺ should come back on the following year to perform ‘Umrah. This treaty became known as the Treay of Al-Hudaybiyah, and it was named after a big village that was given the name of a well located in that area; it is currently located on the outskirts of Makkah.
When the document of treaty was written, the following was mentioned: 'These are the terms,” of the treaty, “on which Muhammad, Allah's Messengerﷺ agreed (to make peace).” They said, "We will not agree to this, for if we believed that you are Allah's Messenger, we would not prevent you (from entering Makkah), but you are Muhammad ibn ‘Abdullah." They said to the Prophet ﷺ, ‘Had we believed in you and you religion, we would not have denied you access to the Sacred House, but we only know you as Muhammad ibn ‘Abdullah,’ (by the name given to him by his father). Thereupon, the Prophet ﷺ said, "I am Allah's Messengerand also Muhammad ibn ‘Abdullah," meaning that he ﷺ did not mind writing down either of them. Then he ﷺ said to ‘Alee (may Allah be pleased with him), who was writing down the terms of the treaty, to rub off (the words) 'Allah's Messenger,’ from the document, but ‘Alee (may Allah be pleased with him) refused. It should be noted that he (may Allah be pleased with him) did not mean to disobey the Prophet’s command, but rather expressed his disapproval of erasing his title out of reverence for the Prophet ﷺ and to defiantly support him against the polytheists. The Prophet ﷺtook the document, erased it himself, after ‘Alee (may Allah be pleased with him) pointed to its place, because he ﷺ was illiterate. He ﷺ then commanded ‘Alee (may Allah be pleased with him) to write down instead, 'This is what Muhammad ibn ‘Abdullah has agreed upon.’ The terms included that no arms may be brought into Makkah by Muslims except those kept in their own cases, and nobody from the people of Makkah would be allowed to go with the Prophet ﷺeven if he wished to follow him (and embrace Islam). On the contrary, the Prophet ﷺwould not prevent any of his Companions from staying in Makkah if they wanted! According to this treaty, the Prophet ﷺ and his Companions returned to Al-Madeenah, after ending their state of Ihraam (i.e., ritual state of consecration) as authentically reported in other narrations. They came back on the following year to perform ‘Umrah, which became known as ‘Umrat Al-Qadhaa’. After the period specified by the terms of the treaty i.e., three days, ended the Makkans went to ‘Alee (may Allah be pleased with him) and asked him to ask the Prophet ﷺ, to leave, as the (agreed-upon) period has passed. When the Prophet ﷺwent out of Makkah, the daughter of Hamzah, Umaamah - it was also said that she was named Faatimah - ran after them, i.e., the Prophet ﷺand his Companions (may Allah be pleased with them), wanting to go with them to Al-Madeenah. ‘Alee received her, led her by the hand, since she was still young, and said to Faatimah, his wife and the Prophet’s daughter, "Take your uncle's daughter." Faatimah (may Allah be pleased with her) held her, but Zayd and Ja‘far (may Allah be pleased with them) quarreled about her; each wanted to take care of her. Zayd (may Allah be pleased with him) claimed her because she was his brother's daughter, since the Prophet ﷺ had established the bond of brotherhood between him and Hamzah (may Allah be pleased with them). ‘Alee (may Allah be pleased with him) claimed her because she was his paternal cousin, his uncle's daughter, and Ja‘far (may Allah be pleased with him) claimed her because she was his uncle's daughter, and her maternal aunt, i.e., Asmaa’ bint ‘Umays (may Allah be pleased with her), was his wife. The Prophet ﷺ judged that she should be given to her maternal aunt, and said that the maternal aunt was like the mother, meaning as far as the right to the custody of a child is concerned, and also in terms of maternal affection and care. He ﷺ then said to ‘Alee (may Allah be pleased with him), "You are from me and I am from you", in terms of blood relations, love, seniority in Islam, and the like of his many great merits. He ﷺ said to Ja‘far (may Allah be pleased with him), "You resemble me both in terms of moral character and outward appearance", and said to Zayd (may Allah be pleased with him), "You are our brother (in faith) and our freed slave.” The bond of Al-Walaa’ (lit., loyalty, meaning to maintain a relationship of patronage without bondage with one’s manumitter) was as strong as the blood bond. The Prophet ﷺ made these statements toconciliate ‘Alee and Zayd (may Allah be pleased with them) for not granting them custody over Hamzah’s daughter, and to highlight that he ﷺ did not place her under Ja‘far’s care for his own sake, but rather because he was married to the girl’s maternal aunt (who was more entitled to the custody).
It was said that this hadeeth is one of the main Laws of Islam texts about the right to custody, which essentially means the care for a young child who is below the age of distinction and cannot live independently, providing him or her with a good upbringing, and guarding him or her against whatever may incur destruction and loss on him or her.
It is deduced from the hadeeth that it is allowable to conclude peace treaties with non-Muslims, conduct political and military agreements with them for the benefit of Muslims.
It is also inferred therefrom that a maternal aunt is entitled to custody over a child.
It also highlights the merits of ‘Alee, Ja‘far, and Zayd (may Allah be pleased with them)..

2701
Narrated Ibn ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him) that Allah's Messengerﷺ set out to perform ‘Umrah but the pagans of Quraysh prevented him from reaching the Ka‘bah. So, he ﷺ slaughtered his animal sacrifice, got his head shaved at Al-Hudaybiyah, and agreed with them that he ﷺ would perform ‘Umrah on the following year, would not carry weapons except swords, and would not stay in Makkah except for the period they allowed. So, the Prophet ﷺperformed ‘Umrah in the following year and entered Makkah according to the treaty, and when he ﷺ stayed for three days, the pagans ordered him to depart, and he ﷺ did.
.

Commentary :
The polytheists (of Quraysh) persecuted and abused the Messenger of Allah ﷺ and his Companions (may Allah be pleased with them), yet he ﷺ honored his agreements and covenants with them.
In this hadeeth, ‘AbdullahNarrated Ibn ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him) that the Prophet ﷺ headed towards Makkah in 6 A.H. to perform ‘Umrah, but the polytheists of Makkah denied him access to the Sacred House. They blocked his way in a place called Al-Hudaybiyah, a village that was named after a well located in that area, currently situated on the outskirts of Makkah. The Prophet ﷺ and the Companions (may Allah be pleased with them) ended their Ihraam (i.e., ritual state of consecration), slaughtered their animal sacrifices in Al-Hudaybiyah, and concluded a peace treaty with the polytheists of Makkah. They agreed to allow Muslims to perform ‘Umrah on the following year, and stipulated a truce between Muslims and the people of Quraysh, and that no arms may be carried by Muslims except their swords, which should be kept in their own cases, and that they must not stay in Makkah beyond the period specified by them. The Prophet ﷺ performed ‘Umrah on the following year, and entered Makkah, in compliance with the terms of the treaty. After spending three days in Makkah, the polytheists commanded the Prophet ﷺ to leave and he did.
It is deduced from the hadeeth that if a person is prevented from performing ‘Umrah, he should end his Ihraam.
It is also inferred from the hadeeth that it is allowable to conclude a peace treaty with the disbelievers and conduct political and military agreements with them for the benefit of Muslims.
It is also deduced that Muslims must abide by their agreements and covenants with the non-Muslims.
.

2703
Narrated Anas (may Allah be pleased with him) that Al-Rabee‘, the daughter of Al-Nadhr, broke the front tooth of a girl, and the relatives of Al-Rabee‘ requested the girl's relatives to accept the Arsh (i.e., restitution, money paid in compensation for bodily injury, wounds, harm … etc.) and forgive her, but they refused. So, they went to the Prophet ﷺ who ordered them to establish retaliation. Anas ibn Al-Nadhr (may Allah be pleased with him) asked, "O Allah’s Messenger! Will the front tooth of Al-Rabee‘ be broken? No, by Him Who has sent you with the Truth, her tooth will not be broken!" The Prophet ﷺ said, "O Anas! Allah, Exalted is He, ordains Qisaas (i.e., retribution)." Afterward, the relatives of the girl agreed and forgave Al-Rabee‘. The Prophet ﷺsaid, "There are some servants of Allah were they to swear by Allah, Exalted is He, (that something would happen), He will certainly make it happen.” Anas (may Allah be pleased with him) added, "They agreed and accepted the Arsh."
.

Commentary :
The Islamic Laws of Islam specified the penalties designated for causing bodily injury and harm, and gave the victim the choice between taking retribution by afflicting an equal bodily injury on the offender, or pardoning and forgiving him.
In this hadeeth, Narrated Anas ibn Maalik (may Allah be pleased with him) that Al-Rabee‘, the daughter of Al-Nadhr (may Allah be pleased with her) broke the front tooth of a girl, and the relatives of Al-Rabee‘ requested the girl's relatives to accept the Arsh (i.e., restitution, money paid in compensation for bodily injury, wounds, harm … etc.) and forgive (the offender), but they refused. Arsh Al-‘Ayb refers to the compensation for a defect that is payable by the seller to the buyer if the latter discovered a defect in the purchased commodity. In the context of offence and criminal injuries, the Arsh is similar in essence, because it compensates for the physical defect (damage) caused. The girl’s relatives refused to accept the Arsh and forgive Al-Rabee‘. They went to the Prophet ﷺ, and referred their dispute to him, and he ﷺ ordered them to establish equivalent retribution. Her brother, Anas ibn Al-Nadhr (may Allah be pleased with him) asked, "O Allah’s Messenger! Will the front tooth of Al-Rabee‘ be broken? No, by Him Who has sent you with the Truth, her tooth will not be broken!" The Prophet ﷺ said, "O Anas! Allah, Exalted is He, ordains Qisaas (i.e., retribution)." This entailed that the front tooth of Al-Rabee‘ would be broken. It is noteworthy that his statement was not an objection to the Prophet’s judgment or the relevant Laws of Islam provision, but he (may Allah be pleased with him) rather wanted the Prophet ﷺ to intercede with them, or it was said before he (may Allah be pleased with him) came to know that Allah, Exalted is He, particularly ordains Qisaas in such situations, and he had thought that they were given the choice between the Qisaas or the Diyyah (i.e., blood money).
Afterward, the relatives of the girl agreed, forgave her, and accepted the Arsh. The Prophet ﷺsaid, "There are some servants of Allah were they to swear by Allah, Exalted is He, (that something would happen), He will certainly make it happen,” because he (may Allah be pleased with him) made such an oath aspiring to the grace of Allah, Exalted is He, who knew of his sincerity and keenness, and therefore made what he desired come true. Were these obedient servants and close allies of Allah, Exalted is He, to swear by His name that something should happen, He would certainly make it come to pass.
It is deduced from the hadeeth that it is allowable for the harmed person to pardon the offender, give up his right to the Qisaas, and accept the prescribed compensation.
The hadeeth highlights the merits of Anas ibn Al-Nadhr (may Allah be pleased with him)..

2704
Al-Hasan Al-Basree said:
By Allah, Al-Hasan ibn ‘Alee led large battalions like mountains against Mu‘aawiyah (may Allah be pleased with them). ‘Amr ibn Al-‘Aas said (to Mu‘aawiyah) (may Allah be pleased with them), "I surely see battalions which will not turn back before killing their opponents." Mu‘aawiyah (may Allah be pleased with him) who was really the best of the two men, said to him, "O ‘Amr! If these killed those and those killed these, who would be left with me for the public jobs to manage people’s affairs? Who would be left to care for their women; who would be left to care for their children?" Then Mu‘aawiyah (may Allah be pleased with him) sent two men from Quraysh, who belonged to the tribe of ‘Abd Shams called ‘Abd Al-Rahmaan ibn Sumurah and ‘Abdullah ibn ‘Aamir ibn Kurayz to Al-Hasan (may Allah be pleased with him) and said to them, "Go to this man (i.e. Al-Hasan) and negotiate peace with him and talk and appeal to him." So, they went to Al-Hasan and talked and appealed to him to accept peace. Al-Hasan (may Allah be pleased with him) said, "We, the offspring of ‘Abd Al-Muttalib, have got wealth, and people have indulged in killing and corruption (and only money will appease them)." They said to Al-Hasan (may Allah be pleased with him), "Mu‘aawiyah offers you such-and-such, appeals to you, and entreats you to accept peace." Al-Hasan (may Allah be pleased with him) said to them, "But who will be responsible for what you have said?" They said, "We will be responsible for it." So, whatever Al-Hasan (may Allah be pleased with him) asked they said, "We will be responsible for it for you." So, Al-Hasan concluded a peace treaty with Mu‘aawiyah (may Allah be pleased with them). Al-Hasan (Al-Basree) said: “I heard Aboo Bakr (may Allah be pleased with him) saying, ‘I saw Allah's Messengerﷺon the pulpit and Al-Hasan ibn ‘Alee (may Allah be pleased with them) was by his side. The Prophet ﷺ was looking once at the people and once at Al-Hasan ibn ‘Alee saying, 'This son of mine is a Saiyid (i.e., a noble leader) and may Allah, Exalted is He, make peace between two big groups of Muslims through him.’”.

Commentary :
Reconciliation between disputing Muslims is a religious obligation required of whoever is able to do so. Al-Hasan ibn ‘Alee ibn Abee Taalib (may Allah be pleased with them) gave us the greatest and finest example of sacrificing his own rights for the sake of reconciliation between the disputing Muslims during the Fitnah (i.e., civil strife) between the Companions (may Allah be pleased with them).
In this hadeeth, Al-Hasan Al-Basree swore by the name of Allah, Exalted is He, that Al-Hasan ibn ‘Alee (may Allah be pleased with them) led large battalions, as big as mountains, against Mu‘aawiyah (may Allah be pleased with him). This could also be a metaphor for strength and power. The battalions led by Al-Hasan ibn ‘Alee (may Allah be pleased with them) were supposed to fight the army of Mu‘aawiyah (may Allah be pleased with him) in fulfillment of the purposes that ‘Alee ibn Abee Taalib (may Allah be pleased with him) sought to achieve during his reign by fighting the people of Shaam under the leadership of Mu‘aawiyah (may Allah be pleased with him). After ‘Alee (may Allah be pleased with him) was killed, his son, Al-Hasan (may Allah be pleased with him), led the battalions and marched to realize the objectives after which his late father sought.
‘Amr ibn Al-‘Aas said to Mu‘aawiyah, urging him to fight Al-Hasan (may Allah be pleased with them), "I surely see battalions,” of brave soldiers, “which will not turn back before killing their opponents." The Arabic word used in the narration is Aqraan, lit. peers or counterparts, and it refers to rivals who have equal courage and military power. The narration goes on, “Mu‘aawiyah (may Allah be pleased with him) who was really the best of the two men said to him, ‘O ‘Amr! If these killed those and those killed these, who would be left with me for the public jobs to manage people’s affairs? Who would be left to care for their women; who would be left to care for their children?’” He (may Allah be pleased with him) meant that the death of their (husbands and) fathers would mean their loss. Al-Hasan Al-Basree’s saying, “who was really the best of the two men,” means that Mu‘aawiyah (may Allah be pleased with him) was better than ‘Amr (may Allah be pleased with him) in this situation because ‘Amr had a much more intense dispute with Al-Hasan and was determined to fight him, whereas Mu‘aawiyah wanted to make peace to prevent bloodshed and preserve Muslims’ lives.
Therefore, Mu‘aawiyah (may Allah be pleased with him) sent two men from Quraysh, who belonged to the tribe of ‘Abd Shams called ‘Abd Al-Rahmaan ibn Sumurah (may Allah be pleased with him) and ‘Abdullah ibn ‘Aamir ibn Kurayz, who was said to have seen the Prophet ﷺ, to Al-Hasan (may Allah be pleased with him) saying to them, "Go to this man (i.e. Al-Hasan) and negotiate peace with him," so that bloodshed could be averted, “and talk and appeal to him,” meaning ask him to give up his right to the caliphate and pass the reins to Mu‘aawiyah (may Allah be pleased with him) instead, and give him whatever he may ask for in return. So, they went to Al-Hasan (may Allah be pleased with him) and talked and appealed to him to accept peace. Al-Hasan (may Allah be pleased with him) said to the two messengers, "We, the offspring of ‘Abd Al-Muttalib, have got wealth,” meaning that the offspring of ‘Abd Al-Muttalib have always been noble and innately generous towards their family and freed slaves, and have always assumed leadership of their people until it became a habit for them, “and people have indulged in killing and corruption (and only money will appease them)." He (may Allah be pleased with him) wanted to eliminate the causes of strife and conflict, and give the money to those whose evil urges and corruption would not be curbed except with it.
They said to Al-Hasan (may Allah be pleased with him), "Mu‘aawiyah offers you such-and-such,” i.e., money, sustenance, and clothes, “and appeals to you and entreats you to accept peace." Al-Hasan (may Allah be pleased with him) said to them, "But who will be responsible for what you have said?" They stated that they would be responsible for it, and would ensure the compliance with the terms that he would stipulate to make peace between Muslims. Whatever Al-Hasan (may Allah be pleased with him) asked they said, "We will be responsible for it for you." So, Al-Hasan concluded a peace treaty with Mu‘aawiyah (may Allah be pleased with them), putting the best interests of Islam and Muslims before his own.
Al-Hasan Al-Basree related that Aboo Bakrah Nufay‘ ibn Al-Haarith Al-Thaqfee (may Allah be pleased with him) saw Allah's Messengerﷺon the pulpit and Al-Hasan ibn ‘Alee (may Allah be pleased with them) was by his side. The Prophet ﷺ was looking once at people and once at his young grandson, Al-Hasan ibn ‘Alee (may Allah be pleased with them), saying, 'This son of mine is a Saiyid (i.e., a noble leader) and may Allah, Exalted is He, make peace between two big groups of Muslims through him.’ The Prophet ﷺ foretold the conflict between Mu‘aawiyah and Al-Hasan (may Allah be pleased with them) over the caliphate, for it did not take them out of the fold of Islam. This year was called the year of Jamaa‘ah (unity), since Muslims were united again and there was an end to the conflict and civil strife.
The hadeeth highlights a sign of prophethood.
It also underlines the merits of Al-Hasan ibn ‘Alee (may Allah be pleased with them).
It is deduced from the hadeeth that it is allowable to make peace with an opponent with money to satisfy the rights of those to whom they are due.
It is also inferred therefrom that messengers should be allowed to convey their messages freely, and must not be harmed.
It is also deduced that the imamate of a less eligible ruler over a more eligible one is valid.
It is also inferred that the leadership of people is earned by those who benefit people, because the Prophet ﷺ conditioned leadership on making peace between disputing people.
.

2705
‘Aa’ishah (may Allah be pleased with him) narrated:
Once Allah's Messengerﷺ heard the loud voices of some opponents quarreling at the door. One of them was appealing to the other to deduct his debt and asking him to be lenient but the other was saying, "By Allah, I will not do so." Allah's Messengerﷺ went out to them and said, "Who is the one who was swearing by Allah that he would not do a good deed?" That man said, "I am that person, O Allah's Messengerﷺ! I will give my opponent whatever he wishes."
.

Commentary :
A creditor is urged to be lenient towards the debtor (in claiming the repayment), and such leniency counts as an act of kindness and a good deed for him. No Muslim should miss out on this (rewardable) good deed and deny himself such reward. Highlighting this meaning, the Mother of the Believers ‘Narrated Aa’ishah (may Allah be pleased with her) that once Allah's Messengerﷺ heard the loud voices of some opponents quarreling at the door. A debtor was asking a creditor to deduct part of the debt and show him some leniency in claiming the repayment, but the creditor refused. He said, "By Allah, I will not do so,” meaning that he would not fulfill his request by reducing the debt or showing him leniency in claiming its repayment. When Allah's Messengerﷺ heard him swear by Allah, Exalted is He, not to do so, he ﷺ went out to them and said, "Who is the one who was swearing by Allah that he would not do a good deed?" The Arabic word used in the hadeeth is Muta’alee, which denotes placing much emphasis on one’s oath. The Prophet ﷺ rebuked such a person for refraining from doing a good deed by fulfilling this debtor’s request. That man said, "I am that person, O Allah's Messengerﷺ! I will give my opponent whatever he wishes,” meaning that he was willing to give him whatever he wanted, reducing the debt or showing more leniency in claiming its repayment and giving him respite until he was able to repay.
The hadeeth urges creditors to show kindness to debtors by writing off part of the debt.
It also warns against making oaths not to perform good deeds.
It highlights the Companions’ reverence for the Prophet ﷺ and their keenness to hasten to his obedience.
It also underlines how the Companions (may Allah be pleased with them) quickly understood what the Prophet ﷺ wanted, their swift compliance with his commands and prohibitions, and their keenness to perform good deeds.
It also encourages the forgiveness and pardon of the verbal abuses between quarrelers and disrespectfully raising one’s voice before the ruler.
It is also inferred therefrom that a debtor is allowed to ask the creditor to write off part of the debt.
It is also deduced that one may intercede with people to whom rights are due in favor of others, and that they are urged to accept the intercession in what is good and permissible.
It is also inferred from the hadeeth that a ruler may interfere personally to make peace between disputing people..

2708
‘Urwah ibn Al-Zubayr narrated that Al-Zubayr (may Allah be pleased with him) told me that he quarreled once with a man from the Ansaar, who had participated in (the battle of) Badr, in front of Allah's Messengerﷺ about a water stream which both of them used for irrigation. Allah's Messengerﷺ said to Al-Zubayr (may Allah be pleased with him), "O Zubayr! Irrigate (your garden) first, and then let the water flow to your neighbor." The man from the Ansaar became angry and said, "O Allah's Messengerﷺ! Is it because he is your cousin?" On that the complexion of Allah's Messengerﷺ changed (because of anger) and he said (to Al-Zubayr), "Irrigate (your garden) and then withhold the water till it reaches the walls (surrounding the palms)." So, Allah's Messengerﷺ gave Al-Zubayr his full right. Before that, heﷺ had given a generous judgment beneficial for both Al-Zubayr and the man from the Ansaar, but when the latter irritated Allah's Messengerﷺ, he gave Al-Zubayr his full right according to the essence of Laws of Islam provisions. Al-Zubayr (may Allah be pleased with him) said, "By Allah, I think the following ayah was revealed concerning that case (which means): {But no, by your Lord, they will not [truly] believe until they make you, [O Muhammad], judge concerning that over which they dispute among themselves and then find within themselves no discomfort from what you have judged and submit in [full, willing] submission.} [Quran 4:65]

.

Commentary :
The Prophet ﷺ was the Imaam, ruler, and judge of Muslims,and adjudicated and settled the disputes between them.
In this hadeeth, Al-Zubayr ibn Al-‘Awwaam (may Allah be pleased with him) narrated that he once quarreled with a man from the Ansaar who had participated in (the battle of) Badr. The man referred the dispute - over a water stream in Al-Harrah that was used by both of them for irrigation - to Allah's Messengerﷺ. Al-Harrah was an open area with black stones,on the outskirts of Al-Madeenah. They both used to irrigate their gardens from this water stream; the water would run through Al-Zubayr’s garden first and then the other man’s. Al-Zubayr (may Allah be pleased with him) used to block the water until he had irrigated his garden, and then allow it to flow and reach his neighbor’s garden. The Prophet ﷺ commanded Al-Zubayr to reasonably irrigate his garden first, and then let the water flow to his neighbor’s garden, but the man from the Ansaar became angry and said, "O Allah's Messengerﷺ! Is it because he is your cousin?" He was referring to the fact that Al-Zubayr was the son of Safiyyah bint ‘Abd Al-Muttalib (may Allah be pleased with them) and suggested that the Prophet ﷺ judged in his favor because he was his relative! Thereupon, the complexion of Allah's Messengerﷺ changed, because of anger which was written all over his face, given this man’s disrespect for the Messenger of Allah ﷺ and his heinous accusation. It should be noted that it was a mere slip of the tongue on part of the man (may Allah be pleased with him). He ﷺ said (to Al-Zubayr), "Irrigate (your garden) and then withhold the water till it reaches the walls (surrounding the palms),” meaning until he (may Allah be pleased with him) had finished irrigating the whole garden. Thus, Allah's Messengerﷺ gave Al-Zubayr his full right.
Before that, Allah's Messengerﷺ had given a generous judgment that was beneficial for both Al-Zubayr and the man from the Ansaar, out of courtesy, and to settle their dispute peacefully, suggesting that Al-Zubayr should irrigate his garden by taking the least amount of water sufficient for irrigation and then allow it to flow to his neighbor’s garden. However, when the man refused and irritated Allah's Messengerﷺ, he gave Al-Zubayr his full right according to the relevant Laws of Islam provisions. It goes without saying that the Prophet ﷺ did not let his anger drive him to undermine this man’s rights or give Al-Zubayr more than what he was entitled to at the expense of his neighbor.
Al-Zubayr (may Allah be pleased with him) said, "By Allah, I think the following ayah was revealed concerning that case (which means): {But no, by your Lord, they will not [truly] believe until they make you, [O Muhammad], judge concerning that over which they dispute among themselves and then find within themselves no discomfort from what you have judged and submit in [full, willing] submission.} [Quran 4:65].
In the ayah, Allah, Exalted is He, swears by His name that no one truly believes unless he accepts the Prophet ﷺ as judge to settle all disputes and would be perfectly content with his judgment, hasten to comply with it and submissively adhere to it. This serves as a reprimand from Allah, Exalted is He, to those who do not seek the judgment of His Messenger ﷺ, negating (the perfection of) their faith until they should be content with his judgment.
It is deduced from the hadeeth that a ruler may pass his judgment based on what he believes to be the truth based on clear evidence, after urging the litigants to opt for reconciliation and the refusal of any of them.
The hadeeth urges Muslims to follow the example of the Prophet ﷺ at times of anger and contentment, and in all situations.It encourages a believer to restrain his anger, keep it in check, refrain from allowing it to drive him to infringe on the rights of others and wrong them, and rather to opt for forgiveness and pardon.
The hadeeth also urges Muslims to seek reconciliation and commands them to do so.
It is inferred therefrom that a ruler may give each litigant his right in full if the litigants refuse to reconcile or accept his proposal of a possible middle way.
It also rebukes whoever disrespects the ruler and governor and punish him accordingly without wronging him.

.

2710
 ‘Abdullah ibn Ka‘b narrated that Ka‘b ibn Maalik (may Allah be pleased with him) told him that during the lifetime of Allah's Messengerﷺ, he demanded his debt from Ibn Abee Hadrad (may Allah be pleased with him) in the Mosque. Their voices grew louder till Allah's Messengerﷺ heard them while he was in his house. So, he ﷺ lifted the curtain of his room and called on Ka‘b ibn Maalik (may Allah be pleased with him) saying, "O Ka‘b!" He (may Allah be pleased with him) replied, "Labbayka (i.e., I am at your service), Allah's Messengerﷺ.”He ﷺ beckoned to him with his hand suggesting that he deduct half the debt. Ka‘b (may Allah be pleased with him) said, "I will do, O Allah's Messengerﷺ!” He ﷺ then said (to Ibn Abee Hadrad), "Get up and pay him the rest."
.

Commentary :
The Islamic Laws of Islamdecreed that a debtor should keenly repay his debts in full and honor his commitments, and also enjoins the creditor to be kind and lenient towards the debtor.
In this hadeeth, Ka‘b ibn Maalik (may Allah be pleased with him)said that during the lifetime of the Prophet ﷺ, he demanded the repayment of his debt from Ibn Abee Hadrad (may Allah be pleased with him) in the Prophet’s Mosque. Their voices grew louder during their discussion till Allah's Messengerﷺ heard them while he was in his house. Therefore, he ﷺ lifted the curtain of his room and called onKa‘b ibn Maalik (may Allah be pleased with him) saying, "O Ka‘b!" He (may Allah be pleased with him) replied, "Labbayka (i.e., I am at your service), Allah's Messengerﷺ.”He ﷺ beckoned to him with his hand suggesting that he deduct half the debt owed by Ibn Abee Hadrad (may Allah be pleased with him). In compliance with the Prophet’s command, Ka‘b (may Allah be pleased with him) wrote off half the debt. It was not a judgment issued by the Prophet ﷺ for Ka‘b to give up his right to half of the debt, but rather aimed to urge him to show kindness and lenience towards the debtor, and he (may Allah be pleased with him) was not required to do so. He ﷺ then said (to Ibn Abee Hadrad), "Get up and pay him the rest,” meaning the other half of the debt.
The hadeeth highlights the virtue of reconciliation and mediation between the disputing people.
It is deduced from the hadeeth that it is allowable to adjudicate disputes over debts and all financial rights in the mosque and issue the apt judgment.
It is also inferred therefrom that it is permissible for a debtor to ask the creditor to write off part of the debt.
It is also deduced that one may intercede with those to whom rights are due in favor of others, and that they are urged to accept this intercession in what is good and permissible.
It is also inferred from the hadeeth that a ruler may interfere personally to make peace between disputing people..

2711
Marwaan and Al-Miswar ibn Makhramah (may Allah be pleased with them) narrated on the authority of the Companions of Allah's Messengerﷺ that when Suhayl ibn ‘Amr agreed to Al- Hudaybiyah Treaty, one of the terms he stipulated then, was that the Prophet ﷺ should return to them (i.e., the pagans of Quraysh) anyone coming to him from their side, even if he was already a Muslim; and would not interfere between them and that person. Muslims did not like this condition and were very indignant by it! Suhayl did not agree (to conclude the treaty) except with that condition. So, the Prophet ﷺ agreed to that condition and returned Aboo Jandal (may Allah be pleased with him) to his father Suhayl ibn ‘Amr. Thenceforward, the Prophet ﷺreturned everyone in that period (of truce) even if he was a Muslim. During that period some believing women emigrated including Umm Kulthoom bint ‘Uqbah ibn Abee Mu‘ayt (may Allah be pleased with her) who came to Allah's Messengerﷺ and was a young lady then. Her relative came to the Prophet ﷺand asked him to return her, but the Prophet ﷺ did not return her to them for Allah, Exalted is He, had revealed the following ayah regarding women. He Says (what means): {O you who have believed, when the believing women come to you as emigrants, examine them. Allah is most knowing as to their faith. And if you know them to be believers, then do not return them to the disbelievers; they are not lawful [wives] for them, nor are they lawful [husbands] for them.} [Quran 60:10]
‘Urwah narrated that ‘Aa’ishah (may Allah be pleased with her)  that the Prophet ﷺ used to examine the believing women who migrated to him in accordance with these ayaat. Allah, Exalted is He, Says (what means): {O you who have believed, when the believing women come to you as emigrants, examine them. Allah is most knowing as to their faith. And if you know them to be believers, then do not return them to the disbelievers; they are not lawful [wives] for them, nor are they lawful [husbands] for them. But give the disbelievers what they have spent. And there is no blame upon you if you marry them when you have given them their due compensation. And hold not to marriage bonds with disbelieving women, but ask for what you have spent and let them ask for what they have spent. That is the judgement of Allah; He judges between you. And Allah is Knowing and Wise. * And if you have lost any of your wives to the disbelievers and you subsequently obtain [something], then give those whose wives have gone the equivalent of what they had spent. And fear Allah, in whom you are believers. * O Prophet, when the believing women come to you pledging to you that they will not associate anything with Allah, nor will they steal, nor will they commit unlawful sexual intercourse, nor will they kill their children, nor will they bring forth a slander they have invented between their arms and legs, nor will they disobey you in what is right - then accept their pledge and ask forgiveness for them of Allah. Indeed, Allah is Forgiving and Merciful.} [Quran 60:10-12] ‘Urwah narrated that ‘Aa’ishah (may Allah be pleased with her) said: “If any of the believing women accepted the condition (assigned in the above-mentioned ayaat), Allah's Messenger ﷺ would say to her, "I have accepted your Bay‘ah (i.e., pledge of allegiance)." "He ﷺ would only say that orally, for, by Allah, his hand never touched, any lady during that process. He ﷺ did not receive their Bay‘ah except by saying, "I have accepted your Bay‘ah for that.".

Commentary :
The Prophet ﷺ was the keenest to honor his covenants or agreements with others, even those made with the polytheists.
In this hadeeth, the Companions (may Allah be pleased with him) narrated that Suhayl ibn ‘Amr, who was one of the leaders of Quraysh and their preacher - he embraced Islam the same year Makkah was conquered - was the representative of the disbelievers of Quraysh at the Treaty of Al-Hudaybiyah in 6 A.H. One of the terms he stipulated then was that the Prophet ﷺ should return to them (i.e., the pagans of Quraysh) anyone coming to him from their side, even if he was already a Muslim, and would not interfere between them and that person. This meant that if any of the people of Quraysh wanted to embrace Islam and join the Muslims, the Prophet ﷺ was bound to return him to the disbelievers, who would kill him if they wished or do whatever they wanted!  Muslims disliked this condition and were very indignant about it! It was very difficult for them to accept such a condition, especially since they were in a strong position and apparently had the right to decline such an unfair condition. However, Suhayl did not agree (to concluding the treaty) except with that condition. So, the Prophet ﷺ agreed to it and returned those who wanted to join the Muslims, one of whom was Aboo Jandal (may Allah be pleased with him), the son of Suhayl ibn ‘Amr, after he (Aboo Jandal) came from Makkah to Al-Hudaybiyah. Thenceforward, the Prophet ﷺreturned whoever came to him during that specified period (of the truce) even if he was a Muslim, in compliance with the agreed-upon term. During that period, some believing women emigrated, including Umm Kulthoom bint ‘Uqbah ibn Abee Mu‘ayt (may Allah be pleased with her), who came to Allah's Messengerﷺ and was a young lady then, meaning that she had recently reached puberty. Her relative came to the Prophet ﷺand asked him to return her, but the Prophet ﷺ did not return her to them, for Allah, Exalted is He, had revealed the following ayah regarding women. He Says (what means): {O you who have believed, when the believing women come to you as emigrants, examine them. Allah is most knowing as to their faith. And if you know them to be believers, then do not return them to the disbelievers; they are not lawful [wives] for them, nor are they lawful [husbands] for them.} [Quran 60:10]. Testing them here meant asking them to take an oath and consider the indicative signs that they most likely had embraced Islam, to verify the sincerity of their faith.
It was also said that the meaning of their examination is to ask them to swear an oath that they did not leave their people to escape their hated husbands, merely sought migration to a different land, or to obtain some worldly gains, and ensure that they came only out of their love for Allah, Exalted is He, and His Messenger ﷺ.
The Mother of the Believers ‘Narrated Aa’ishah (may Allah be pleased with her) that the Prophet ﷺ used to examine the believing women who migrated to him in accordance with these ayaat. Allah, Exalted is He, Says (what means): {O you who have believed, when the believing women come to you as emigrants, examine them. Allah is most knowing as to their faith. And if you know them to be believers, then do not return them to the disbelievers; they are not lawful [wives] for them, nor are they lawful [husbands] for them. But give the disbelievers what they have spent. And there is no blame upon you if you marry them when you have given them their due compensation. And hold not to marriage bonds with disbelieving women, but ask for what you have spent and let them ask for what they have spent. That is the judgement of Allah; He judges between you. And Allah is Knowing and Wise. * And if you have lost any of your wives to the disbelievers and you subsequently obtain [something], then give those whose wives have gone the equivalent of what they had spent. And fear Allah, in whom you are believers. * O Prophet, when the believing women come to you pledging to you that they will not associate anything with Allah, nor will they steal, nor will they commit unlawful sexual intercourse, nor will they kill their children, nor will they bring forth a slander they have invented between their arms and legs, nor will they disobey you in what is right - then accept their pledge and ask forgiveness for them of Allah. Indeed, Allah is Forgiving and Merciful.} [Quran 60:10-12]. The ayaat referred to their pledge of allegiance to refrain from associating partners with Allah, Exalted is He, stealing, committing Fornication (i.e., illicit sexual intercourse), or falsely attributing their illegitimate children to their husbands. It was also said that His Saying {between their arms,} means their tongues, and {and legs,} means their private parts. They had also to pledge not to disobey the Prophet ﷺ in whatever is lawful and good. It was said that this referred particularly to wailing over the dead, and it was also said that it referred to staying alone with non-Mahram men. Another opinion suggested that it referred to all the known rights of Allah, Exalted is He, over His servants.
Afterward, ‘Narrated Aa’ishah (may Allah be pleased with her) that whoever from among the believing women accepted these conditions, Allah's Messenger ﷺ said to her, "I have accepted your Bay‘ah (i.e., pledge of allegiance)." She (may Allah be pleased with her) swore by Allah that the Prophet’s hand never touched any lady during that process. It was done verbally since the Prophet ﷺ only shook the hands of men who gave him the Bay‘ah.
.

2721
 ‘Uqbah ibn ‘Aamir (may Allah be pleased with him) narrated that the Prophet ﷺ said, "From among all the conditions which you have to fulfill, the conditions which make it lawful for you to have sexual relations (i.e., stipulated in marriage contracts) have the greatest right to be fulfilled."
.

Commentary :
The believers are Islamically bound by their own conditions, and it is incumbent on a Muslim to comply with every condition that conforms with the Book of Allah, Exalted is He, and the Sunnah of His Prophet ﷺ, and does not conflict with them.
In this hadeeth, the Prophet ﷺ informed us that the first and foremost of these conditions, and the most deserving of fulfillment is the one by means of which sexual intercourse is deemed lawful. This means the conditions stipulated in marriage contracts whereby it becomes lawful for a man to engage in sexual intercourse with his wife. This is why such conditions were declared the most deserving of fulfillment (considering the solemnity of the marriage bond).
It is noteworthy that such conditions must not contradict the essence and implications of the marriage contract to begin with. Rather, they must be within the scope of what a marriage contract entails and aims to fulfill, such as stipulating fostering kindness, providing for one’s wife, providing her with clothes and accommodation within what is reasonably and customarily acceptable, fulfilling her rights over him, establishing justice among co-wives,  or stipulating that she must not leave his home without his permission, that she must not disobey him, observe voluntary fasting without his permission, or does not allow anyone access to his home without his permission, dispose of his wealth and belongings except in a manner acceptable to him, and the like. However, this does not apply to the conditions that conflict with the very essence and implications of marriage, such as stipulating that the wife must not take a dower or that a husband is not required to provide for her and the like; such conditions must be broken. These conditions are invalid and if they are cancelled, the marriage contract would be valid, for the Prophet ﷺ said: “Every condition that is not in the Book of Allah is invalid, even if there are one hundred conditions. The Book of Allah is more deserving of being followed and the conditions of Allah, Exalted is He, are more binding.” [Al-Bukhaaree and Muslim].
The hadeeth urges the fulfillment of marital rights..

1160
Mu‘ādhah al-‘Adawiyyah reported: I asked ‘Ā’ishah, the wife of the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him): “Did the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) used to fast three days of each month?" She said: 'Yes.' I said to her: "Which days of the month did he use to fast?" She said: "It did not matter to him which days of the month he fasted.".

Commentary : People would ask the Prophet's wives about his custom regarding matters unclear to them or those they liked to learn about.
In this Hadīth, the Tābi‘i Mu‘ādhah al-‘Adawiyyah informs that she asked ‘Ā’ishah, the Mother of the Believers, (may Allah be pleased with her): "Did the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) use to fast three days of each month?" The Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) urged the observance of fasting for three days every month, as narrated in the Two Sahīh Collections. In response to her, ‘Ā’ishah (may Allah be pleased with her) said: 'Yes', he used to fast them, and this was the minimum he would fast in a month. Then, Mu‘ādhah al-‘Adawiyyah asked for the specification of these days; whether they were at the start, middle, or end of the month, and whether they were successive or separated? ‘Ā’ishah (may Allah be pleased with her) told her that the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) did not care about fixing these days; rather, she would find him fasting at the start of the month and at its middle and at its end. It was said: He (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) probably did not observe three specific days in a persistent manner, lest it might be thought they were specified.
In a Hadīth narrated by Abu Dāwūd, ‘Abdullāh ibn Mas‘ūd (may Allah be pleased with him) reported: The Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) used to fast - meaning at the Ghurrah of each month - three days, i.e., the start of the month. The Ghurrah of something is its beginning. It was also said: He meant the white days in the middle of the month during which the moon becomes full, namely the 13th, 14th, and 15th days. This is because Ghurrah also refers to whiteness. So, the Companion ‘Abdullāh ibn Mas‘ūd, who reported the Hadīth, probably mentioned the usual practice based on his knowledge of the Prophet's conditions and that he used to fast these days. Also, ‘Ā’ishah (may Allah be pleased with her), as narrated in the Two Sahīh Collections, reported that the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) would fast so often outside Ramadan until it was said: He does not cease fasting. And he would refrain from fasting until it was said: He does not fast. Nonetheless, he used to fast on certain days, like the days at the start of the month and its middle, as well as on Mondays and Thursdays.
The bottom line is that there were numerous conditions for the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) regarding fasting. Every Companion reported what he knew about the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him), or what he saw, or what was suitable in a certain situation; all the reports about the Prophet's fasting are authentic, which falls under permissibility and flexibility for those who want to fast as they wish while being keen to adhere to the Prophet's Sunnah and keep away from the days in which fasting is prohibited.
In the Hadīth: Demonstrating the practice of the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) as he used to fast often and diligently.

1162
Abu Qatādah al-Ansāri (may Allah be pleased with him) reported: The Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) was asked about his fasting. He said: . The Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) got angry. Thereupon, ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him) said: "We are pleased with Allah as a Lord, with Islam as a religion, with Muhammad as a Messenger, and with our pledge of allegiance as a pledge of allegiance." He said: He was asked about fasting of Ad-Dahr (all days), and he said: May he not fast or break his fast, or he has not fasted or broken his fast. He said: He was asked about fasting for two days and not fasting for one day, and he said: Who could bear that?! He said: He was asked about fasting one day and not fasting for two days, and he said: I wish that Allah had given us the strength for that. He said: He was asked about fasting one day and not fasting for one day, and he said: That is the fasting of my brother David (Dāwūd) (peace be upon him). He said: He was asked about fasting on Monday, and he said: That is the day on which I was born and the day on which I was sent (as a Prophet), or the revelation was sent down to me on that day. He said: And he said: Fasting three days every month and from Ramadan to the next Ramadan is (equivalent to) the fasting of Ad-Dahr (all days). He said: He was asked about fasting on the day of ‘Arafah, and he said: It expiates the past year and the coming one. He said: He was asked about fasting on the day of ‘Āshūrā’, and he said: It expiates the past year..

Commentary : The Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) liked that a Muslim should perform the deeds he can bear and do regularly. People used to ask about his guidance (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) regarding matters confusing and unclear to them, or about things they would like to know, so that they could follow his example and attain success.
In this Hadīth, Abu Qatādah al-Ansāri (may Allah be pleased with him) relates that the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) was asked about his fasting, meaning: the fasting of the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him). In the version by Ahmed, it is mentioned that the questioner was a Bedouin, an Arab living in the desert. He (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) got angry and the effect of anger became manifest on his face, due to this man's statement and question. He probably got angry because he disliked the question, as he would need to answer it and feared that his answer would lead to some evil, namely that the questioner might think it to be obligatory or too little, or he might restrict himself to it while his condition allowed for more than that. As for the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him), he restricted himself to it due to his preoccupation with the interests and rights of Muslims, and the rights of his wives and guests and those who came to him, lest his example might be followed by anyone, and this would cause harm to some people. The questioner should have said: How much should I fast? Or: How should I fast? Thus, he would pose the question regarding himself, to which he would give him an answer based on his condition, as he gave answers to others on the basis of their respective conditions. Moreover, the Prophet's fasting did not follow one pattern. Rather, it would differ with the difference of conditions. He would sometimes fast often and at other times less often, and a situation like that makes it hard to answer the question.
When ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him) noticed the Prophet's anger, he - out of politeness and respect towards the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) and as an apology and appeasement to him, and out of pity towards the questioner - said: "We are pleased with Allah as a Lord, with Islam as a religion, with Muhammad as a Messenger," i.e., we are pleased with His planning and predestination for us, and we have taken Him as our God and Deity, apart from anyone else. And we are pleased with Islam as a religion, as we have chosen it from among all religions and entered it being content and submissive, and we did not seek a religion other than Islam. And we are pleased with Muhammad (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) as a Messenger. We are pleased with all he brought from Allah Almighty and accepted that with submission and delight, and we believed what he said, obeyed his commands, and shunned his prohibitions, and we loved, followed, and supported him.
"and with our pledge of allegiance as a pledge of allegiance," which refers to the pledge of allegiance over Hijrah and Jihad. This shows complete faith and submission to Allah and to His Messenger and religion.
When the Prophet's anger subsided, ‘Umar asked him - as related in another version by Muslim - in a more accurate and rational manner that was closer to the truth. He posed his question in a general way that would benefit all people. He asked him about fasting for all days, which is the fasting for all the days of the year consecutively, and about the state of he who observes such fasts, as to whether it is commendable or dispraised. Thereupon, the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) said: "May he not fast or break his fast;" or he said: "He has not fasted or broken his fast." The meaning: He does not struggle against the severity of hunger and thirst because he gets used to fasting and so it becomes easier for him, and he does not need the patience over the effort upon which the reward is conditional. Hence, he becomes like one who did not fast. And since he does not gain the comfort and pleasure felt by those who break their fast, it is as if he did not break his fast. It was said: This means supplication against him, by way of deterring him. It may also be an informative statement, meaning that it is as if this person did not break the fast because he ate nothing, and he did not observe the fast because his fast was not prescribed by the Lawgiver.
Then, he asked him about a person fasting for two days and not fasting for one day. Thus, the days he fasts are double the days he does not fast, which makes this act of worship more common than the usual way of life. Thereupon, the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) said: "Who could bear that?!", i.e., who can do that being able to continue fasting while discharging his other duties of the day?! He seemed to have disliked it, for it mostly goes beyond people's capacity, and so it is not encouraged by an easy and tolerant religion. It was said: It indicates that the reason for prohibition is weakness, which means: If anyone can bear it, there is nothing wrong with that.
Then, he asked him about a person fasting one day and not fasting for two days. Thus, the days he does not fast are double the days he fasts, and he continues to do that for all his life. The Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) replied to him, saying: I wish that Allah had given us the strength for that. He seemed to have approved of this type of fasting and hoped to observe it. It was said: That his wish pertains to others in his Ummah, for the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) would bear it and more than that, and it is authentically reported that he (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) used to observe continuous fasts. It was said: This means that because of his preoccupation with his wives, guests, activities, and people, the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) did not observe this amount of fasting on a continuous basis. This is not because of his weakness to bear fasting, or his lack of patience over abstinence from eating for this period.
Then, he asked him about a person who fasts one day and does not fast for one day, and who takes that as a habit. In response, the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) said: "That is the fasting of my brother David (Dāwūd) (peace be upon him)." This indirectly indicates that the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) encouraged this fasting, for it is very moderate and it takes the two aspects of worship and habit into the best consideration, and it is one of the most beloved fasts to Allah Almighty, as related in the Two Sahīh Collections. This is because it is not ongoing fasting nor ongoing abandonment of fasting.
Then, he asked him about the reason behind fasting on Monday. Thereupon, the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) said: "That is the day on which I was born and a day on which I was commissioned (as a Prophet)," i.e., the day of the beginning of my prophethood; so, it is the day most worthy of being fasted. Or he said: "the revelation was sent down to me therein;" the revelation began to come down on it.
Then, the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) said that fasting three days every month - which applies to specification, like the fasting of the white days: the 13th, 14th, and 15th days; or to generality, like fasting three days at the beginning of the month, its middle, or at its end, successively or sporadically - and the fasting of Ramadan every year is equivalent to the fasting of all days. That is, Allah, out of His grace and generosity, multiplies the reward for every act of goodness and worship, involving words or deeds, tenfold. So, a good deed is multiplied to ten similar good deeds. Likewise, the fasting of one day is recorded as fasting of ten days. Accordingly, if a person fasts three days, it is as if he fasts thirty days, which is a whole month. Thus, by fasting three days every month, it is as if he fasts the entire year, in addition to the obligatory fasting in the month of Ramadan.
And he asked him about fasting on the day of ‘Arafah. In response, the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) said that whoever fasts it, Allah forgives for him the sins of two years: the past year and the coming year. This fasting is to be observed by non-pilgrims, for it is disliked for a pilgrim to fast on the day of ‘Arafah. This is because fasting on this day will make the pilgrim too weak to stand and supplicate. As for non-pilgrims, they are addressed by this Hadīth to the relevant merit and attainment of rewards from Allah Almighty. The day of ‘Arafah is the ninth day of Dhul-Hijjah. It was called as such because it comprises one of the pillars of Hajj, namely standing at ‘Arafah in Makkah.
Then, he asked him about the fasting of the day of ‘Āshūrā’, which is the tenth day of the month of Muharram. This is the day in which Allah saved Moses (peace be upon him) and his people from Pharaoh. So, Moses fasted it in gratitude to Allah for His favor in destroying the oppressors. In response, he (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) said that Allah forgives by fasting this day the sins of the past year.
This expiation includes minor sins, not the major ones. As for major sins, they can only be expiated by repentance or mercy from Allah, or it is hoped the major sins will be alleviated. It was said: The expiation for the coming year is that He will preserve him from committing sins in it. It was also said: that He will give him an amount of mercy and reward that expiates for the past year and the next one if it comes and he commits sins therein.
These questions by ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him) point to his proper understanding. He first calmed the anger of the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) and then asked him about certain types of fasting that comprise all that a Muslim can observe, and he knew their rulings, while demonstrating which of them are valid and which are not and pointing out the merit of some of them. Meanwhile, he taught us all of that. So, whoever wishes can observe the valid fast and choose what is more suitable for himself and his ability.
The Hadīth points out the merit of fasting on Monday.
It also points out the merit of fasting on the day of ‘Āshūrā’.
It also shows the merit of fasting on the day of ‘Arafah.
And it demonstrates the merit of fasting during the month of Ramadan.
The Hadīth points out that Allah is Kind to His servants, and He facilitates things for them and removes hardships and restrictions from them.
The Hadīth prohibits fasting for all days.
And it forbids overburdening oneself in worship with things beyond one's capacity..

1163
Abu Hurayrah (may Allah be pleased with him) reported in a Marfū‘ Hadīth: He [i.e., the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him)] was asked: "Which prayer is the most excellent after the obligatory prayer? And which fasting is the most excellent after the month of Ramadan?" He said: "The most excellent prayer after the obligatory prayer is prayer in the middle of the night, and the most excellent fasting after the month of Ramadan is fasting Allah's month of Al-Muharram.".

Commentary : Prayer and fasting are among the pillars of Islam. Allah determined the obligatory prayer as five prayers during the day and night and determined the obligatory fasting as the fasting of the month of Ramadan. But, if anyone wants to perform these two forms of worship on a voluntary basis, the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) specified its meritorious times during which the servant obtains the best reward.
In this Hadīth, Abu Hurayrah (may Allah be pleased with him) relates that the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) was asked about the best times and conditions for offering prayer and observing fast voluntarily. So, someone asked him: What are the best prayers after performing the five obligatory prayers, which must be offered? These are the best forms of worship whereby a servant can seek closeness to Allah Almighty before thinking about supererogatory and additional worship, in case he wants to offer that voluntarily. In a clarifying and demonstrating reply, the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) said: "The most excellent prayer after the obligatory prayer is prayer in the middle of the night." This is because prayer during the night is more likely to be free from Riyā’ (show-off) and closer to sincerity, and the praying person can offer it in a focused and carefree manner away from daytime preoccupations. Plus, this is more helpful in remembering the Qur’an and not forgetting some of the verses. The middle of the night means: the last third of the night.
And he was asked about the most excellent fasting after the obligatory fasting of Ramadan, and he replied that the most excellent fasting after the month of Ramadan is fasting Allah's month of Al-Muharram, which is one of the sacred months within which Allah prohibited fighting. The month is attributed to Allah by way of extolment. It is the first month in the Hijri calendar, which is a reason for him to start it with the doing of good and receive it with worship. This is one of the best deeds, just as the first part of the day is received with Dhikr. So, it is hoped that this expiates for the rest of the year, akin to the merit of Dhikr in the early part of the day. It is also probable that since fighting was prohibited during Muharram, seizing its time for fasting was a good opportunity because the times during which fighting is permissible may entail that the believer does not fast, for fasting causes weakness.
The Hadīth points out the merit of prayer in the middle of the night.
It demonstrates the merit of fasting during the month of Muharram.
It also indicates that supererogatory and voluntary worship can be offered after performing the obligations..

1164
Abu Ayyūb al-Ansāri (may Allah be pleased with him) reported: The Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) said: "If anyone fasts Ramadan and then follows it with six days in Shawwāl, it will be like a perpetual fast.".

Commentary : The Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) used to fast some days every month on a voluntary basis, and he urged his Companions to do the same. He also urged the fasting of some days within the months of the year, given their abundant reward.
In this Hadīth, he directed the Muslims to fast six days in Shawwāl, after Ramadan, and pointed out that if anyone fasts the entire Ramadan and then fasts six days in Shawwāl, successive or sporadic - for fasting them successively or sporadically falls under the adherence to the Sunnah - he will obtain a reward equivalent to fasting the entire year. This stems from the great bounty of Allah towards His Muslim servants, as He multiplies the reward for them. This is explained by the verse that reads: {Whoever comes with a good deed will be rewarded tenfold.} [Surat al-An‘ām: 160] The month of Ramadan is equivalent to ten months, and fasting six days after Eid al-Fitr completes the year.
The Hadīth points out the merit of fasting six days in the month of Shawwāl..

1166
Abu Hurayrah (may Allah be pleased with him) reported: The Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) said: "I was shown Laylat al-Qadr, and then some members of my family woke me up, and I was caused to forget it. So, seek it in the remaining ten days." [And in a version]: I forgot it..

Commentary : Laylat al-Qadr is a great night whose status Allah points out in Surat al-Qadr. In this night the Qur’an was revealed; worship in it is better than worship in a thousand months; the angels descend in it with the permission of Allah; and it contains safety, security, and peace. It is known to occur, but its time is unknown. Several versions are reported from the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) regarding the specification of Laylat al-Qadr. This Hadīth is one of those versions, and in it the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) said: "I was shown Laylat al-Qadr," i.e., I was made aware of the specification of Laylat al-Qadr and on which night it occurs, but "some members of my family woke me up." This indicates that the Prophet's sighting of it was in a dream. However, his dreams (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) and the dreams of the prophets (peace be upon them) were divine revelations. This does not denote that he did not learn about it during wakefulness. As the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) was caused to forget it, he said: "So, seek it in the remaining ten days," i.e., try to find it in the remaining ten days, which are the last ten days of the month of Ramadan as a whole. Other versions in the Two Sahīh Collections state that it occurs on odd-numbered days within the last ten days of Ramadan. The Prophet's statement: "seek it" denotes encouragement to try to find it. This should be done by engaging in worship, supplication, and pious acts.
This Hadīth mentions that the reason behind the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) forgetting Laylat al-Qadr was that some members of his household awakened him. And it is mentioned in a Hadīth in the Sahīh Al-Bukhāri Collection, reported by ‘Ubādah ibn as-Sāmit (may Allah be pleased with him), that the reason behind that was a dispute and conflict between two men. And also in a Hadīth in the Sahīh Muslim Collection, reported by Abu Sa‘īd al-Khudri (may Allah be pleased with him), with the wording: "There came two men contending with each other and along with them was the devil." To reconcile these two Hadīths, this may either be taken to denote plurality; thus, the vision in the Hadīth of Abu Hurayrah (may Allah be pleased with him) was a dream. The forgetfulness happened because of awakening, and the vision in the Hadīth reported by others happened during wakefulness, while the forgetfulness occurred because of the mentioned dispute. Or it may be taken to suggest the occurring of the two stories, in which case the forgetfulness happened twice for two reasons. Or this may probably mean: Some members of my family awakened me, and I heard the dispute between the two men and got up to mediate between them. So, I was caused to forget it, due to my preoccupation with the two men.
The Hadīth indicates that the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) was subject to forgetfulness, in what Allah willed.
It points out that Laylat al-Qadr lies in the last ten days of Ramadan.
It urges us to seek Laylat al-Qadr..

1168
‘Abdullāh ibn ’Unays reported: The Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) said: "I was shown Laylat al-Qadr and then I was caused to forget it. I saw myself prostrating in water and mud on its morning." He said: We had rain during the twenty-third night. So, the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) led us in prayer and left, and indeed the trace of water and mud was on his forehead and nose. He said: ‘Abdullāh ibn ’Unays used to say: The twenty-third..

Commentary : There is no doubt that the greatest month in the sight of Allah is the month of Ramadan, and the greatest night is Laylat al-Qadr. Therefore, the Companions (may Allah be pleased with them) diligently tried to specify it. So, numerous Hadīths were reported on determining this night.
In this Hadīth, ‘Abdullāh ibn ’Unays (may Allah be pleased with him) relates that the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) said: "I was shown Laylat al-Qadr and then I was caused to forget it," i.e., I came to know on which day it occurs. Then, this knowledge was taken away from me. Jibrīl (Gabriel) (peace be upon him) informed him of its specific time in that year. The Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) saw in a dream - and the dreams of the prophets are true and truth, and constitute revelation from Allah Almighty - that its sign is that he (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) was prostrating in water and mud. Then, ‘Abdullāh ibn ’Unays (may Allah be pleased with him) related that it rained on the twenty-third night. The Prophet's vision of himself prostrating in water and mud came true. He led them in Qiyām al-Layl and departed after the prayer as the trace of water and mud was on his forehead and nose due to prostrating over them. This was confirmation of the Prophet's dream. The roof of his mosque was made of palm leaf stalks. Based on this Hadīth, ‘Abdullāh ibn ’Unays (may Allah be pleased with him) used to determine Laylat al-Qadr to be the twenty-third night every year. Several Hadīths are reported specifying the time of Laylat al-Qadr. The scholars had a lot to say on reconciling these Hadīths or favoring some above others. This includes: that Laylat al-Qadr moves every year within the last ten days of Ramadan. It was called Laylat al-Qadr because of its high status and rank, or because the pious deeds performed therein are of great significance. Out of Allah's wisdom, He concealed it from people for them to diligently seek it within the nights, and thus, they will engage more in worship, which brings benefits to them.
The Hadīth mentions prostration on water and mud.
It states that the dreams of the prophets are true.
It urges us to seek Laylat al-Qadr and utilize it for the performance of righteous deeds, given the increased merit and reward therein.
It affirms prostration on the forehead and nose..

1170
Abu Hurayrah (may Allah be pleased with him) reported: We were talking about Laylat al-Qadr in the presence of the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him), who said: "Who amongst you remembers when the moon rose and it was like a half of plate?".

Commentary : Laylat al-Qadr is a great night. Allah points out its status in Surat al-Qadr. The Qur’an was revealed therein. Worship in it is better than worship in a thousand months. The angels descend in it with the permission of Allah, and it contains safety, security, and peace. It is known to occur, but its time is unknown. Several versions are reported from the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) regarding the specification of Laylat al-Qadr or the nature of its night.
This Hadīth is one of those versions, and it identifies one of the characteristics of Laylat al-Qadr. Abu Hurayrah (may Allah be pleased with him) relates that they talked to one another about Laylat al-Qadr and its status and significance, the merit of performing Qiyām al-Layl therein, and its signs which were mentioned by the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him). Thereupon, the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) said: "Who amongst you remembers when the moon rose, and it was like a half of plate?" He likened the moon to half of a food plate. The meaning: Who amongst you remembers the night in which half of the moon appeared like half of a food plate? This was the sign of Laylat al-Qadr in this month known to them and in that year, or the sign of Laylat al-Qadr in all years. This indicates that Laylat al-Qadr can be seen and verified by whomever Allah wills..

1175
‘Ā’ishah (may Allah be pleased with her) reported: The Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) would strive more in the last ten days than he would strive in other than them..

Commentary : The Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) was most keen on attaining rewards, and he was good at utilizing the virtuous times, including the last ten days of Ramadan, which are the best nights of the year, and they contain Laylat al-Qadr (the Night of Decree), which is better than a thousand months.
In this Hadīth, the Mother of the Believers ‘Ā’ishah (may Allah be pleased with her) relates that when the last ten days of Ramadan came - starting from the night of the 21th day until the end of the month - the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) would strive more in them than he would strive at other times, i.e., more than his diligence in other nights. This is due to the significance and merit of those nights and in pursuit of Laylat al-Qadr. He would engage more in righteous deeds and worship, draw close to Allah Almighty, retire in his praying place, and keep away from women. This is demonstrated by another version in the Two Sahīh Collections: "When the ten days came, he would pray all night, wake up his family, show diligence, and tie up his lower garment firmly."
The Hadīth demonstrates keenness to engage diligently in worship during the last ten days of Ramadan.
It indicates that one should strive to have the best possible ending of Ramadan..

1176
‘Ā’ishah (may Allah be pleased with her) reported: I never saw the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) fasting during the ten days..

Commentary : The month of Dhul-Hijjah is one of the sacred months. It includes the ten days at its beginning, during which righteous deeds are greatly meritorious. They include the day of ‘Arafah, the ninth day. And they include the day of Eid al-Ad'ha, the tenth day. A number of Hadīths are reported on their merit.
In this Hadīth, the Mother of the Believers ‘Ā’ishah (may Allah be pleased with her) reports that she did not see the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) fasting during the first ten days of Dhul-Hijjah. In another version narrated by Muslim, she said: "He did not fast the ten days." The ten days here refer to the nine days from the beginning of Dhul-Hijjah, for fasting on the day of Eid is forbidden.
This Hadīth indicates that it is disliked fasting the ten days; whereas other Hadīths point to the merit of performing pious deeds - which include fasting - in those ten days. It is authentically narrated in the Sahīh Al-Bukhāri Collection that the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) said: "There are no deeds on any day better than deeds in these," i.e., the first ten days of Dhul-Hijjah. It is probable that the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) did not observe fasting on these days because he would sometimes abandon certain deeds, though he would like to perform them, for fear that they might be ordained upon his Ummah. The merit of fasting the day of ‘Arafah by non-pilgrims is mentioned in a Hadīth narrated by Muslim: "Fasting the day of ‘Arafah, I expect from Allah that it expiates the sins of the preceding year and the next one.".

1184
‘Abdullāh ibn ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him) reported: I heard the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) proclaim Talbiyah with his hair matted, saying: "Labbayka allahumma labbayk, labbayka la sharīka laka labbayk, inna al-hamda wa an-ni‘mata laka wa al-mulk, la sharīka lak." (Here I am at Your service, O Allah, here I am at Your service, here I am at Your service. You have no partner; the praise, the favor, and the dominion belong to You. You have no partner). He would not say anything more than these words. ‘Abdullāh ibn ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him) used to say: The Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) would offer two Rak‘ahs in Dhul-Hulayfah, and when his she-camel stood upright with him on its back near the mosque of Dhul-Hulayfah, he proclaimed Talbiyah with these words. ‘Abdullāh ibn ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him) used to say: ‘Umar ibn al-Khattāb (may Allah be pleased with him) used to proclaim Talbiyah like the Talbiyah of the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) with these words and would say: Labbayka allahumma labbayk, labbayka wa sa‘dayk, wa al-khayr fi yadayk, labbayka wa ar-raghba’ ilayka wa al-‘amal (Here I am at Your service, O Allah, here I am at Your service. Here I am at Your service, in bliss. Good is in Your Hands. Here I am at Your service; things are sought of You, and deeds are done for Your sake)..

Commentary : This Hadīth demonstrates the manner of the Prophet's Talbiyah upon assuming Ihrām for Hajj. ‘Abdullāh ibn ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him) mentions that the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) "proclaimed Talbiyah," i.e., he said Talbiyah in a loud voice, "with his hair matted," i.e., he put something like glue in his hair to prevent it from drooping or to keep insects away. The Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) used to say in his Talbiyah: "Labbayka allahumma labbayk" (Here I am at Your service, O Allah, here I am at Your service), i.e., I repeat my response to You in complying with Your command to perform Hajj; so, I respond to Your command time and again. "labbayka la sharīka laka labbayk" (Here I am at Your service; You have no partner), i.e., You alone are Sovereign in Your dominion, without any opponent or partner. "inna al-hamda wa an-ni‘mata laka" (the praise, the favor... belong to You), i.e., praise, gratitude, and laudation are due to You alone, and every favor comes from You, and You are the Giver of it. "wa al-mulk, la sharīka lak" (and the dominion belongs to You; You have no partner). He mentioned the dominion after the praise and favor to generalize the causes of obedience and demonstrate the aspects of submission and worship. Then, he followed that with the words "la sharīka lak" (You have no partner) to dispel any resemblance to Him and affirm that He alone is the Possessor of the dominion, the praise, and the favor. The Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) would not say anything beyond these words in his Talbiyah and the assumption of Ihrām. It is said: The wisdom behind Talbiyah is to note Allah's honor to His servants as they come to His House after a call from Him.
Then, ‘Abdullāh ibn ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him) says that the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) offered two Rak‘ahs in the mosque of Dhul-Hulayfah. This refers to the Zhuhr prayer performed in a shortened form, as related in a Hadīth narrated by Muslim and reported by Ibn ‘Abbās. Dhul-Hulayfah is a place lying outside Madīnah, on the way to Makkah. Dhul-Hulayfah is located 6 or 7 miles, nearly 9 or 10km, away from Madīnah. It is the Miqāt of the people of Madīnah and the non-residents who pass by it. It is known today among the ordinary people as Abiyār ‘Ali or Ābār ‘Ali. It lies about 420km away from Makkah. On the day he arrived in Dhul-Hulayfah, the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) performed the ‘Asr prayer therein as two Rak‘ahs. Then, he performed the Maghrib, ‘Ishā’, Fajr, and Zhuhr prayers there. Thus, he offered five prayers there and stayed for a day and night. "and when his she-camel stood upright with him on its back near the mosque of Dhul-Hulayfah," i.e., he rode his she-camel, and it stood up in preparation for moving, "he proclaimed Talbiyah with these words," i.e., the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) raised his voice as he said this supplication mentioned earlier.
Then, ‘Abdullāh ibn ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him) relates that ‘Umar ibn al-Khattāb (may Allah be pleased with him) would assume Ihrām and raise his voice as the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) used to do and say: "Labbayka allahumma labbayk, labbayka wa sa‘dayk" (Here I am at Your service, O Allah, here I am at Your service. Here I am at Your service, in bliss), i.e., bliss after bliss, and I repeat that time and time again. "Wa al-Khayr fi yadayk" (Good is in Your Hands); good comes from You alone. "Labbayka wa ar-raghba’ ilayka wa al-‘amal." (Here I am at Your service; things are sought from You, and deeds are done for Your sake), i.e., things are sought from You and asked of You.
This addition was from the words of ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him). Other additions to Talbiyah are reported from some of the Companions, who added them by way of increasing what is good. It is narrated in the Two Sahīh Collections that the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) would not criticize the Talbiyah proclaimed by any of his Companions..

1185
Ibn ‘Abbās (may Allah be pleased with him) reported: The polytheists used to say: "Labbayk la sharika lak" (Here I am at Your service; there is no partner with You.) He said: The Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) would say: "Woe to you! Enough, enough." They would say: "illa sharika howa lak; tamlikuhu wa ma malak" (Except a partner with You, whom You possess and all what he possesses." They would say that while performing Tawāf around the House!.

Commentary : Talbiyah for Hajj among the Muslims involves proclamation of the Tawhīd of Allah, sincere devotion to Him, and keeping away from Shirk. As for the polytheists, they used to proclaim Talbiyah for Hajj with Shirk.
In this Hadīth, ‘Abdullāh ibn ‘Abbās (may Allah be pleased with him) reports that the polytheists used to say while performing Tawāf around the Ka‘bah: "Labbayk, there is no partner with You." So, they would commence the Talbiyah with Tawhīd. Since the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) knew what they would add after that, he would say to them when they pronounced Talbiyah with Tawhīd: "Woe to you!" i.e., you will be in ruin and destruction for what you add to the Talbiyah. "Enough, enough!" i.e., your statement of Tawhīd is sufficient. Limit your Talbiyah to it and do not add the subsequent words: "illa sharika howa lak; tamlikuhu wa ma malak" (Except a partner with You, whom You possess and all what he possesses." By the partner, they meant their idols. This phrase in Arabic (tamlikuhu wa ma malak) has two potential meanings: First: You possess him and what is in his possession. Second: You possess him and he possesses nothing. They acknowledge that he is not worthy of any worship, for he is capable of nothing for himself or others, and that indeed the Sovereign is Allah. Nonetheless, they associate him with Allah in worship, out of ignorance or stubbornness, transgression, and arrogance! Allah Almighty says: {They have taken besides Him other gods who can create nothing but are themselves created. Nor do they have the power to harm or benefit themselves, nor do they have the power to cause death, give life or resurrect the dead.} [Surat al-Furqān: 3]
Moreover, Ibn ‘Abbās (may Allah be pleased with him) says that they used to say that while performing Tawāf around the Sacred House of Allah by way of seeking closeness to Allah Almighty through false words, which are rejected..

1186
Sālim reported: When Ibn ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him) was told that Ihrām should start from Al-Baydā’, he would say: Al-Baydā’ about which you tell a lie about the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him)! The Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) did not proclaim Talbiyah except at the tree when his camel stood up with him on its back..

Commentary : The Companions (may Allah be pleased with them) learned the rituals of Hajj from the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) during the Farewell Hajj, as he enjoined them to do, and they passed them on to those who came after them.
In this Hadīth, Sālim ibn ‘Abdullāh ibn ‘Umar mentions that when his father ‘Abdullāh (may Allah be pleased with him) was told that raising one's voice with Talbiyah in Hajj or ‘Umrah should start from Al-Baydā’, he would deny that and say: "Al-Baydā’ about which you tell a lie about the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him)!" i.e., you allege that the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) started his Talbiyah in his Hajj when he reached Al-Baydā’. You are mistaken in this. He attributed lying to them, for they said something contrary to reality. This does not mean intentional lying. Indeed, the Arabs tend to say to one who made an error: You lied. Al-Baydā’ is a place near Dhul-Hulayfah from the direction of Makkah. It was called Baydā’ for the absence of landmarks therein such as buildings and the like. What is meant here is the elevated and high place opposite Dhul-Hulayfah from the direction of Makkah.
Then, Ibn ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him) explained what is right to them, namely that the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) did not raise his voice with Talbiyah "except at the tree" located near the mosque of Dhul-Hulayfah, which is a village situated 6 or 7 miles (nearly 10km) away from Madīnah, and it is the Miqāt for the people of Madīnah and the non-residents who pass by it. This happened when he set out for the Farewell Hajj. He raised his voice with Talbiyah as he rode his camel and made it stand up to leave, after he had assumed Ihrām at that location.
The difference between the Companions (may Allah be pleased with them) over the places from which the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) proclaimed Talbiyah is probably caused by the fact that each of them talked about what he saw. The Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) left Madīnah for Hajj. When he prayed in the mosque of Dhul-Hulayfah, he proclaimed Talbiyah for Hajj, which some people heard and memorized from him. Then, he rode his she-camel, and it stood up, he proclaimed the Talbiyah, of which some people became aware, for they were coming in groups. So, they heard him and said: Indeed, the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) proclaimed the Talbiyah when his she-camel stood up with him on its back. Then, the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) proceeded, and when he ascended the elevated place of Al-Baydā’, he proclaimed the Talbiyah, which some people became cognizant of and said: Indeed, he proclaimed the Talbiyah when he ascended the elevated place of Al-Baydā’. So, each of them transmitted what he had heard. This shows that the difference arose over the starting of the Talbiyah and the assumption of Ihrām from the Miqāt. This confusion is cleared up by a Hadīth narrated by Abu Dāwūd, in which Ibn ‘Abbās (may Allah be pleased with him) said: "By Allah, he proclaimed the Talbiyah in his place of prayer, proclaimed the Talbiyah when his she-camel stood up with him on its back, and proclaimed the Talbiyah when he ascended the elevated place of Al-Baydā’.".

1195
Ibn ‘Abbās (may Allah be pleased with him) reported that Zayd ibn Arqam came, and ‘Abdullāh ibn ‘Abbās said to him, reminding him: "How did you tell me about the meat of the game presented as a gift to the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) while he was in a state of Ihrām?" He said that he said: "He was presented with a slice of the meat of the game, and he refused it, saying: "Indeed, we will not eat it; we are in a state of Ihrām.".

Commentary : Hajj is one of the pillars of Islam, and it is an act of worship for those who can find a way to it. During it, some permissible things become forbidden for those who assume Ihrām for Hajj. One of these is that Allah Almighty says: {But hunting land animals is forbidden to you as long as you are on pilgrimage.} [Surat al-Mā’idah: 96]
In this Hadīth, the Tābi‘i Tāwūs ibn Kaysān al-Yamāni relates that Zayd ibn Arqam (may Allah be pleased with him) came from Kufa to ‘Abdullāh ibn ‘Abbās (may Allah be pleased with him), and Ibn ‘Abbās asked him to relate to him what he had previously told him about the Prophet's action when some meat from a hunted land animal was presented to him as a gift while he was in a state of Ihrām for Hajj. In other words, did the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) accept it and eat therefrom or refuse it? So, Zayd ibn Arqam (may Allah be pleased with him) told him that when the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) was presented with some meat and he knew that it was part of a hunted land animal, he refused the gift and did not accept it from the person who offered it to him. Then, the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) clarified to the man who presented the gift that he refused it because he was in a state of Ihrām, and a Muhrim may not eat from hunted land animals.
In a Hadīth in the Two Sahīh Collections, Abu Qatādah (may Allah be pleased with him) reported that the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) ate from his game while being in a state of Ihrām. However, Abu Qatādah was not in a state of Ihrām when he hunted this animal from which the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) ate. Reconciling the two Hadīths, the scholars said that he refused the first gift because the man hunted it for his sake, whereas he deemed the second game lawful because no role was played by a Muhrim in its hunt, and he did not hunt it for his sake. So, if a non-Muhrim hunts an animal for himself and then presents part of it to a Muhrim, there is nothing wrong with that, and the Muhrim may eat from it.
The Hadīth demonstrates the Prophet's guidance upon refusing a gift, and that he would mention the reason for refusing it. This stems from his good manners (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him)..

1197
Mu‘ādh ibn ‘Abdur-Rahmān ibn ‘Uthmān at-Taymi reported: We were with Talhah ibn ‘Ubaydullāh as we were in a state of Ihrām. A bird was presented to him as a gift. Meanwhile, Talhah was sleeping. Some of us ate and some of us refrained. When Talhah woke up, he agreed with those who ate it and said: "We ate it along with the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him).".

Commentary : Hajj is one of the pillars of Islam, and it is an act of worship for those who can find a way to it. During it, some permissible things become forbidden for those who assume Ihrām for Hajj.
In this Hadīth, the Tābi‘i ‘Abdur-Rahmān ibn ‘Uthmān at-Taymi says that they were one day with the Companion Talhah ibn ‘Ubaydullah (may Allah be pleased with him) as the people were in a state of Ihrām for Hajj or ‘Umrah. Meanwhile, a grilled or cooked bird was gifted to Talhah (may Allah be pleased with him), and it probably was a hunted bird. Talhah was reclining, asleep. So, he did not know about the bird gifted to him, and the ruling on eating therefrom was not clear to those in the state of Ihrām. Therefore, the people fell under two categories; some of them ate from this bird, and others feared and refrained from eating from the gifted bird thinking that a Muhrim may not eat from it. "When Talhah woke up, he agreed with those who ate it," i.e., he described their action as right, by words or deeds. Clarifying the reason behind his approval of those who ate, Talhah said: We ate the like of that along with the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) while we were in a state of Ihrām. So, eat from what was gifted to me.
In the Two Sahīh Collections, Ibn ‘Abbās reported: As-Sa‘b ibn Jaththāmah al-Laythi presented to the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) the meat of a zebra while he was in Al-Abwā’ or Waddān (they are two places). The Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) declined to eat therefrom. Upon noticing the unpleasant feeling on his face, he said to him: "Indeed, we only declined it because we are in a state of Ihrām."
Reconciling between the two Hadīths, it is to be said that the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) permitted the bird for them because the Muhrims played no role in hunting it. This is also explicitly mentioned in a Hadīth in the Two Sahīh Collections, in which Abu Qatādah (may Allah be pleased with him) reported that he hunted a zebra, and when they asked the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him), he said to them: "Did anyone of you command him or point to him with something?" They said: 'No.' So, he said: "Then, eat what is remaining of its meat."
As for declining the meat of the hunted animal from As-Sa‘b ibn Jaththāmah, this is because he hunted it for the Prophet's sake, and he (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) was in a state of Ihrām, and a Muhrim may not eat from the meat of a prey which was hunted for him. Had he not been in a state of Ihrām, he would have accepted it and eaten it.
The Hadīth shows how the Companions used to explain the rulings of the religion to the contemporary Tābi‘is..

1202
Ibn ‘Abbās reported: The Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) got himself cupped and paid the cupper his wage, and he put medicine in his nose..

Commentary : Allah Almighty has made good things lawful for His slaves and made unlawful for them anything evil and impure concerning food, drink, gains, trade, etc. The Shariah has also urged Muslims to have self-esteem and to elevate themselves from lowly things.
In this Hadīth, ‘Abdullāh ibn ‘Abbās (may Allah be pleased with him) mentions that the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) "got himself cupped," i.e., he asked someone to cup him. Cupping is to extract some blood from the body by pricking the area of pain and then absorbing and extracting this blood after collecting it by means of a cup, which is an instrument resembling a funnel. Cupping provides treatment for a variety of pains. The Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) paid the person who cupped him his wage for that. This is part of the Prophet's actual acts of Sunnah. If it was prohibited to give a wage to a cupper, he would not pay this cupper a wage. The scholars took the Hadīths prohibiting the earning by a cupper and stating that it is impure to denote purification and exaltation above lowly earnings and to urge noble manners and lofty matters. Or perhaps the prohibition was in the early days of Islam, and it was subsequently abolished. So, when he paid the cupper his wage, he abrogated the previous ruling.
Then, Ibn ‘Abbās (may Allah be pleased with him) mentioned another medicine which the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) used, saying: "and he put medicine in his nose." To use it, a person lies down and places something below his shoulders to raise them, and then he puts drops of the medicine into his nose, so that they can reach his brain. Then, the illness comes out with sneezing.
The Hadīth demonstrates the Prophet's use of medicine and his pursuit of the proper means of treatment.
It mentions that the cupper took a wage for cupping..