Narrated al-Miswar (ra): Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) slaughtered (the Hady) before he had his head shaved and then he ordered his Companions to do the same.
.

Commentary : Obstruction with reference to the Hajj and ‘Umrah refers to being prevented and impeded from approaching The Holy Mosque in Makkah by an enemy, illness, or something else. If a Muslim intended to perform the Holy Pilgrimage or ‘Umrah; and then is detained from completing his Hajj or ‘Umrah; then he is a muhsar, which is a technical term used for someone facing a situation similar to what has been aforementioned and is obstructed from completing their pilgrimage.
In this hadeeth, there is a narrative/account of what the Messenger of Allah ﷺdid when he was prevented from completing the ‘Umrah of al-Hubaydeeyah, when the Prophet ﷺset out to perform the ‘Umrah in the sixth year after the Hijrah. However, the polytheists prevented him ﷺ from arriving in Makkah. As a result, he ﷺ abandoned this ‘Umrah, and after that ratified his accord with the people of Makkah, which is known as the Treaty of al-Hubaydeeyah.
al-Miswar ibn Makhramah (ra) reports that when the Prophet ﷺreleased himself from the state of Ihraam that he assumed for Hajj, he ﷺbegan to slaughter the hady - which is a name for the sacrificial animal - whether it be: a camel, cow, sheep, or goat - that is offered and slaughtered in the Sacred Precinct. Then, after slaughtering the hady, he ﷺshaved his noble head and ordered the Companions to do the same. Shaving the head or cutting the hair is the last rite of ‘Umrah, and it requires one to release themself from the state of Ihraam.
This hadeeth explains how the muhsar should release himself from the state of ihraam..

1821

Narrated ‘Abdullah ibn Abee Qataadah: My father set out (for Makkah) in the year of Al-Hudaybiyyah, and his companions assumed Ihraam, but he did not. At that time, the Prophet (ﷺ) was informed that an enemy wanted to attack him, so the Prophet (ﷺ) proceeded onwards. While my father was among his companions, some of them laughed among themselves. (My father said), "I looked up and saw an onager. I attacked, stabbed, and caught it. I then sought my companions' help, but they refused to help me. (Later) we all ate its meat. We were afraid that we might be left behind (separated) from the Prophet (ﷺ), so I went in search of the Prophet (ﷺ) and made my horse to run at a galloping speed at times and let it go slow at an ordinary speed at other times till I met a man from the tribe of Bani Ghifar at midnight. I asked him, "Where did you leave the Prophet (ﷺ) ?" He replied, "I left him at Ta'hun and he had the intention of having the midday rest at As-Suqya. I followed the trace and joined the Prophet (ﷺ) and said, 'O Allah's Messenger (ﷺ)! Your people (companions) send you their compliments, and (ask for) Allah's Blessings upon you. They are afraid lest they may be left behind; so please wait for them.' I added, 'O Allah's Messenger (ﷺ)! I hunted an onager and some of its meat is with me. The Prophet (ﷺ) told the people to eat it though all of them were in the state of Ihraam."
.

Commentary : There are legal rulings and etiquettes that the one who is in his state of Ihraam must observe until his acts of worship are completed in the most perfect manner according to the will of Allah, The Mighty and Majestic. One of these legal provisions is the prohibition of hunting wild game while in the state of Ihraam; as Allah, The Almighty says: {O you who have believed, do not kill game while you are in the state of Ihraam} [Quan 5:95]
In this hadeeth, ‘Abdullah ibn Abee Qataadah narrates that his father, AbooQadaadah al-Haarith ibn Rabee‘ee al-Ansaaree (ra) had set out with the Prophet ﷺand his Companions (ras) during the year of al-Hudaybiyyah, which was in the sixth year after Hijrah when they had intended to perform ‘Umrah. Al-Hudaybiyyah is a large village near Makkah, that borders the city. It was named after a well that was there before, and now there is a valley between it and Makkah about twenty-two kilometres on the way to Jeddah.
When news reached the Messenger of Allah ﷺthat an enemy from among the polytheists was intending to attack him ﷺ, The Prophet ﷺ sent AbooQataadah (ra) with a group of his companions (ras) so that he could gather information concerning this enemy. The Companions (ras) in this group were in the state of ihraam for ‘the Umrah, whereas AbooQataadah was not because they were anticipating an ambush, so he feared that he might have to fight and, if he was in this sanctified state, it would have prevented him from doing that [combat] to some extent. While he (ra) was among his companions, he saw them laughing amongst themselves; then after he looked up and saw an onager. Rather, their laughter was out of astonishment that he would rise up and hunt in their midst, despite not being exposed to it directly. Nor was their laughter an indication from them to urge AbooQataadah to hunt. So, when AbooQataadah (ra) caught sight of it, he rode his horse in pursuit of this game. He (ra) sought help from his companions with some of his matters related to the hunt, but they refused to help him because they knew that it was not permissible to hunt while in the state of ihraam.
Then, AbooQataadah reported that he pounced on the onager; then proceeded to stab it, and caused it to lie in its place, motionless. He requested of them to help him carry and transport the onager, but they refused. Then, however, they took part in eating from it; and after they ate, they had doubts on the permissibility of eating from it because: they were in the state of Ihraam for Hajj and doubted whether or not they had indirectly partaken in the hunting. So, they asked the Prophet ﷺabout the legal ruling of eating from it. His statement in the narration: “We feared that we would be cut off” means: ‘We will be cut off and separated from The Prophet ﷺ because he ﷺ had left before them. AbooQataadah set out to search for The Prophet ﷺ, when he rode his horse in a swift manner at times, and let it proceed along gently at other times. Then he met a man from tribe of Banee al-Ghifaar and proceeded to ask him the whereabouts of The Prophet ﷺ. The man told him that the Prophet ﷺ was at Ta‘han, which is a water spring about three miles from al-Suqyaa on the path to Makkah. After, he related that he ﷺ had intention to take a siesta at a place named al-Suqyaa, which is a connecting suburban town that lies between Makkah and al-Madeenah. So AbooQataadah (ra) met him ﷺthere and informed The Prophet ﷺ that his Companions (ras) had sent their salutations and asked him ﷺ to wait for them so that the enemy would not intercept them and separate them from him ﷺ. Shortly after, he (ra) told the Messenger of Allah ﷺ what had happened with regards to hunting the onager, which is permissible, and not prohibited in any religious rites, and that his companions ate from it with him while they were in the state of Ihraam for pilgrimage. The Prophet ﷺapproved their actions and told him that it was permissible for them to eat from the lawful game and directed those who were present to eat from what AbooQataadah brought along with him.
This hadeeth shows the permissibility of eating a wild donkey. And it explains that it is permissible for the pilgrims to eat from game which has been hunted, when the one who hunts, it is permitted to do so [i.e., not be in a state of ihraam], without the pilgrim helping him with anything.
It illustrates that we should exhibit kindness and act benevolently with friends and companions while traveling. And lastly, it shows the permissibility of sending salutations and the Islamic greeting of peace to those who are not present..

1823

Narrated AbooQataadah (ra): We were in the company of the Prophet (ﷺ) at a place called Al-Qaahah and some of us had assumed Ihraam while the others had not. I noticed that some of my companions were watching something, so I looked up and saw an onager. (I rode my horse and took the spear and whip) but my whip fell down (and I asked them to pick it up for me) but they said, "We will not help you by any means as we are in a state of Ihraam." So, I picked up the whip myself and attacked the onager from behind a hillock and slaughtered it and brought it to my companions. Some of them said, "Eat it." While some others said, "Do not eat it." So, I went to the Prophet (ﷺ) who was ahead of us and asked him about it, He replied, "Eat it as it is lawful.”
.

Commentary : There are legal rulings and etiquettes that the pilgrim must observe until his acts of worship are completed in the most perfect manner according to the will of Allah, The Mighty and Majestic. One of these legal provisions is the prohibition of hunting wild game while in the sacred state that one enters for the Holy Pilgrimage; as Allah, the Almighty says: {O you who have believed, do not kill game while you are in the state of Ihraam} [Quan 5:95]”.
In this hadeeth, AbooQataadah, al-Haarith ibn Rib’ee al-Ansaaree (ra) reports he and other people set out with the Messenger of Allah ﷺ for the ‘Umrah of al-Hudaybiyyah in the sixth year after Hijrah. However, on their way to Makkah, word had reached the Messenger of Allah ﷺthat an enemy from among the polytheists was intending to attack him. In response, the Prophet ﷺ sent AbooQataadah (ra) with a group of people so that he could gather information concerning this enemy. When they were at al-Qaahah, which is a place close to al-Madeenah, he noticed his companions looking at an onager. AbooQataadah (ra) and some of the other Companions (ras) were not in the state of Ihraam, while some of the others were. AbooQataadah (ra) hurriedly set out to hunt it, then his whip fell out of his grasp; so, he asked them to hand him his whip, but they refused because they were in the state of Ihraam at the time, but they did not offer any suggestion or assistance in killing the game, including any indication or means that would contribute to the act in any way, shape or form. AbooQataadah took the whip himself and came up to the donkey from behind a hillock - which is a mound that rises up from the ground - then attacked and slaughtered it, then carried it to his companions. His companions who were in the state of Ihraam disagreed over this; some of them thought it was permissible to eat from it, while others deemed it impermissible due to the fact they were in a state of ihraam and doubted whether or not they had indirectly partaken in the hunting. Thereupon, AbooQataadah (ra) went out seeking the Prophet ﷺ, since he ﷺ had left before them. He asked him ﷺ about the matter, to which he responded by stating that they could eat from it, because the meat is lawful for them to consume as long as they did not partake in the hunting in any shape or form.
This hadeeth shows the permissibility of eating a wild donkey. And it explains that it is permissible for the one in Inhraam to eat from game which has been hunted, when the one who hunts it, is permitted to do so [i.e., not be in a state of ihraam];without the one in the state of Ihraam helping him with anything..

1825

Narrated ‘Abdullah ibn ‘Abbaas (ra) from Al-Sa'b ibn Jath-thaamah Al-Laythee that the latter presented an onager to Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) while he was at Al-Abwaa or at Waddaan, and he (ﷺ)refused it. On noticing the signs of some unpleasant feeling of disappointment on his face, the Prophet (ﷺ) said to him, "I have only returned it because I am in the state of Ihraam."
.

Commentary : There are legal rulings and etiquettes that the pilgrim must observe until his acts of worship are completed in the most perfect manner according to the will of Allah, The Mighty and Majestic. One of these legal provisions is the prohibition of hunting wild game while in the sacred state that one enters for the Holy Pilgrimage; as Allah, the Almighty says: {O you who have believed, do not kill game while you are in the state of Ihraam} [Quan 5:95]”.
In this hadeeth, al-Sa‘b ibn Jath-thaamah (ra) narrates that the Prophet ﷺrefused some meat of a wild donkey that he had offered him ﷺwhile they were at al-Abwaa’ - or Waddaan - which are two places located between Makkah and about two hundred and fifty kilometres southwest from al-Madeenah.
The Prophet ﷺ explained to him as to why he did this by saying: “I have entered the state of ihraam, which serves as one of the many beautiful demonstrations of his noble character because he ﷺ said this when he noticed al-Sa‘b’s face change to one of sadness when he ﷺ rejected al-Sa’b’s offering. The Messenger of Allah ﷺ made it clear to him that he did not refuse it for any other reason other than because he was in the state of ihraam and did not eat slaughtered game while in that sacred mode of being.
The Prophet’s ﷺrefusal to accept the offering of onager from al-Sa‘b ibn Jaththaamah (ra) does not contradict his acceptance when he (ﷺ)ate from the wild donkey which AbooQataadah (ra) hunted. This is because the difference between these two situations is that AbooQataadah did not hunt the donkey for the Prophet (ﷺ), rather AbooQataadah (ra) hunted it for himself. Then his companions ate with him, and the Prophet ﷺ ate from it. As opposed to al-Sa‘b ibn Jatht-haamah (ra) who hunted the donkey for the Prophet ﷺ. And for that reason, the Messenger of Allah ﷺ refused to accept his offering or eat from it; because the one in state of Ihraam should not hunt while they are in the state of Ihraam, nor eat from game that he hunted, which would be forbidden or permissible for him under normal circumstances.
This hadeeth urges the one who refuses to accept a gift and the like to clarify and offer a legitimate excuse to the one presenting the gift as a means to soothe their heart.
It illustrates the noble character of our beloved Prophet ﷺ, and his ﷺ beautiful conduct that he exhibited towards his Companions (ras).
It shows the permissibility of eating a wild donkey. And lastly, it explains that it is permissible for the pilgrims to eat from game which has been hunted, when the one who hunts it, is permitted to do so [i.e., not be in a state of ihraam];without the one in Ihraam helping him with anything..

1826

Narrated ‘Abdulllah ibn ‘Umar (ra): Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) said, "It is not sinful of a person in state of Ihraam to kill five kinds of animals."
.

Commentary : Allah, The Mighty and Majestic, and His Messenger ﷺhave explained what is permissible for the person who is in the state of Ihraam to partake in, and what is prohibited to him. And all this has been transmitted to us by the noble and renowned Companions (ras).
In this hadeeth, The Prophet ﷺ states that there are five types of animals which are permissible for the one in Ihraam to kill in the Sanctuary of Makkah, and there is no sin, interdiction, or punishment for doing so. Although it is understood that the ruling which has been mentioned in this narration restricts it to five, it does not really let us know what that limitation encompasses, despite alluding to the number of animals which have been restricted. It is possible that the Prophet ﷺsaid it (i.e., the ruling itself) first, and afterwards indicated that only five take part in the legal ruling. These five types of animals have been mentioned in another narration reported in Saheeh al-Bukhaaree and Saheeh Muslim. And they are:
The crow, which is a black bird that is well known, and it pecks at the backs and eyes of camels, and steals people’s food.
The kite, which is a type of bird that snatches people’s food away.
The mouse, and what is intended here are house mice, which are vermin that cause damage, spread disease, and the like.
The scorpion, which is a small insect that has eight legs, and its eyes are on its back. It can sting and cause great pain, and some of its stings have proven fatal.
And the mordacious dog, which is any canine that frightens, wounds, and aggressively attacks people.

So, for these five types, there is no sin acquired by the person who is in the state of Ihraam if they were to kill them within the Sanctuary of Makkah, and permission has been given to kill them because they can bring harm or injury to the people.
He ﷺmentioned the rabid dog in order to warn the people of what harm it may cause to the body with regard to an encounter and struggle with the animal. The mordacious dog is any canine which frantically tears up its prey; and for this reason, a dog is called a kalb in Arabic - since in the Arabic language, the root letters k - l - b oftentimes connote the meaning of something or someone being ravenous, rabid, crazy, or frenzied, which are prominent characteristics of a rabid dog. And he ﷺ mentioned the scorpion in order to warn the people of what harm could happen to the body were it to be stung by it unexpectedly. Likewise, he ﷺ mentioned the kite and crow, which often lurk out in the open and clearly visible, as a means to warn others about the unanticipated damage or loss that could occur to one’s possessions. The Prophet ﷺ mentioned the mouse to warn against what damage and harm they cause to property, which oftentimes occurs out of sight. Or, it was todraw one’s attention to every type of animal which is closest to it in likeness, in order to serve as a warning against those kinds of animals that are above it with respect to harm or injury, while simultaneously indicating whatever creatures that may be similar to it. So, his wording concerning the kite and crow is also a warning against the falcon and the like. And for the mouse, it acts as an admonition against other vermin that causes harm. Similarly, for the scorpion, a warning against the snake. And lastly, for the rabid dog, a caution against predatory animals which are abovethem in severity and peril..

1830

Narrated ‘Abdullah (ra): While we were in the company of the Prophet (ﷺ) in a cave at Minaa, when the surah of “Wal-Mursalaat” was revealed, and he (ﷺ) recited it, and I heard and learned it directly from the Prophet’s (ﷺ) mouth while his (ﷺ) mouth was still moist, and his (ﷺ) saliva had not dried out. Suddenly, a snake sprang at us, and the Prophet (ﷺ) said (ordered us): "Kill it." We ran to kill it, but it escaped quickly. The Prophet (ﷺ) said, "It has escaped your evil and you too have escaped its evil."
.

Commentary : Allah, The Mighty and Majestic, and His Messenger ﷺhave explained what is permissible for the pilgrim to partake in, and what is prohibited to him. And all this has been transmitted to us by the noble Companions (ras).
In this hadeeth, ‘Abdullah ibn Mas‘ood (ra) reports that they were with the Prophet ﷺin a cave near Minaa; which indicates that they were in the state of Ihraam. Minaa is a valley near the Sacred Precinct of Makkah that the pilgrims descend into, in order to remain there on the eighth day of Thooo al-Hijjah (i.e., the first day of Hajj) and throw their pebbles at the three pillars (the jamaraat) there on the three days after ‘Eid (i.e., the eleventh, twelfth, and thirteenth of Thoo al-Hijjah). And while Ibn Mas’ood was with him, the surah al-Mursalaat was revealed to the Prophet ﷺ. He (ra) related that he heard and learned it directly from the Prophet’s ﷺ mouth while his ﷺ mouth was still moist, and his ﷺ saliva had not dried out. This is a metaphor for how fast they learned immediately right after they heard him ﷺreciting, and without any delay or hesitation.
Suddenly, a snake descended upon them unexpectedly and sprang towards them. Thereupon, the Prophet ﷺurged them to kill it. In another narration transmitted in Saheeh Muslim, it is reported: “that the Messenger of Allah ﷺ ordered a person who has assumed Ihraam to kill a snake near Minaa.” This confirms that they were wearing the garments that are worn when one is in a state of Ihraam. Upon hearing the order of the Prophet ﷺ, they hastened towards it - in compliance with the Messenger of Allah’s ﷺ command - so that they could kill it. But they were not able to seize it, and the snake was able to escape. The Prophet ﷺsaid to them that it was shielded from your viciousness, as you had been safeguarded from its. That is to say that: Allah preserved it from you all, just as He preserved you all from it. And it was not harmed by you, just as you were not harmed by it.
In this moment, the Prophet ﷺwas amicable in his speech and had removed whatever came to their minds; because there is no doubt that when the Companions (ras) hastened towards the serpent, and it slipped past them; something came to their minds and blamed themselves, thinking: “How did we not notice it, then do what the Prophet ﷺhad commanded us?! Thereupon, he ﷺexplained to them that it was shielded from your viciousness, and you too have been safeguarded from its viciousness.
This hadeeth explains the time and place when surah al-Mursalaat was revealed.
It highlights the permissibility of the one in Ihraam removing anything which poses a harm to himself or those around him.
And lastly, it shows the permissibility of killing a snake in the Holy Sanctuary..

1831

Narrated ‘Aaishah (raa): Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) called the lizard afuwaysiq, but I did not hear him ordering it to be killed."
.

Commentary : Islam commands us to be benevolent towards animals, and our religion has prohibited us from killing them in vain, or without some benefit. At the same time, however, it also protects the interests of the people from harm and damages.
In this hadeeth, the Mother of the Believers, ‘Aa’isha (raa), mentions that the Prophet ﷺcalled the desert gecko with a leprous complexion, a fuwaysiq. The desert gecko is a small, crawling reptile that looks similar to a crocodile that climbs up walls; and is known to the general public who speak Arabic as al-burs. The Arabic word, fuwaysiq, is the diminutive form for the Arabic word which connotes the meaning of: ‘a transgressor or immoral person’. It is an exaggerated diminution of something which is contemptible, censured, and noxious. The Prophet ﷺ has designated some creatures as ‘transgressors’ because they go out to people and bring detriment or harm to them, or to other animals; including forms of harm that cannot be avoided.
‘Aa’isha (raa) then reports that she never heard the Prophet ﷺorder for the desert gecko to be killed. There is no pretext for this however, as it is not necessary that just because she did not hear it, that it (i.e., the order) did not happen at all. Others have heard the order issued, as it has been transmitted in Saheeh al-Bukhaaree and Saheeh Muslim in the hadeeth narrated by Sa’d ibn Abee Waqqaas (ra), who relates that the Messenger of Allah ﷺ ordered for the geckos to be killed and called them noxious little creatures. So, it would have been killed both in regions outside the Sacred Precinct, as well as within the Sanctuary of Makkah.
This hadeeth shows the permissibility of killing harmful animals, even if it occurs within the Sanctuary of Makkah..

1834

Narrated Ibn ‘Abbaas (ra): On the Day of the Conquest of Makkah, the Prophet (ﷺ) said, "There is no more emigration (from Makkah), but Jihad and intentions, and whenever you are called for Jihad, you should go immediately. No doubt, Allah has made this place (Makkah) a sanctuary since the creation of the heavens and the earth and will remain a sanctuary till the Day of Resurrection as Allah has ordained its sanctity. Fighting was not permissible in it for anyone before me, and even for me it was allowed only for a portion of a day. So, it is a sanctuary with Allah's sanctity till the Day of Resurrection. Its thorns should not be uprooted, and its game should not be chased; and its luqatah (fallen things) should not be picked up except by one who would announce that publicly, and its vegetation (grass etc.) should not be cut." Al-`Abbaas said, "O Allah's Messenger (ﷺ)! Except theithkhir, (for it is used by their blacksmiths and for their domestic purposes)." So, the Prophet (ﷺ) said, "Except the ithkhir."
.

Commentary : The emigration from Makkah to al-Madeenah was necessary for the believers at the beginning of Islam; it came as a victory for the religion, and as a form of protection for the Muslims. Hence, the Prophet ﷺemigrated, along with his Companions (ras).
In this hadeeth, ‘Abdullah ibn ‘Abbaas (ra) narrates that on the Day of the Conquest of Makkah - which occurred in the eighth year after Hijrah - the Prophet ﷺhad related that there is no more emigration from Makkah to al-Madeenah after the conquest; and that is because, in the beginning, the believers were ordered to flee from the persecution and abuse of the disbelievers; for fear that they would turn away from their religion and return to one of disbelief. As for after the conquest of Makkah and emergence of Islam, there was not a reason for them to return for an emigration, because the believers became secure in themselves, worshipping their Lord as He wills, when He wills, and wheresoever He wills. However, in reality, the rule for emigration remains for those who have embraced Islam in the abode of disbelief and cannot practice or believe in their religion openly and are able to leave from there. The Prophet ﷺthen said: “...Aside from combat and intentions.” That is to say: ‘...aside from: the possibility that you may have to repel the polytheists in battle, and an upright intention for the good; by which you may attain the virtues that are shared in the concept of the emigration that was required, so that you could separateyourself from the false group, that blackness does not increase over their hearts, and to uplift the Word of Allah and proclaim His religion.’ This sentence includes a prophecy from The Prophet ﷺproclaiming that Makkah will always remain an abode of Islam forever, because he ﷺnegated the emigration there after its conquest. This indicates the city of Makkah will not return to an abode of disbelief again since the religious emigration is always from a land of disbelief to an abode of Islam.
Then, The Messenger of Allah ﷺsaid: “...whenever you are called upon, you must take heed and go.” Meaning: ‘Whenever the leader summons you to a battle to fight the disbelievers, then take heed and set out with him.’
Afterwards, he ﷺstates that the venerable city of Makkah was made sacrosanct by Allah on the day He created the heavens and earth; and its sanctification is an ancient matter which came from a previous set of laws; and not from what the Prophet ﷺbrought forth nor is pertinent to his revelation. It is possible that the meaning is: rather, He created the land of Makkah at the time when He created Makkah sacred. This sanctity will continue until the Day of Resurrection and remain eternal thereafter. It is reported on the authority of ‘Abdullah ibn Zayd (ra) that the Prophet ﷺ said: “Verily, Ibraaheem (peace be upon him) declared that Makkah was sacred, and made supplication for its people.” [Saheeh al-Bukhaaree and Saheeh Muslim]. It is possible that there is a connection between these two hadeeths because its sanctity was established on the day that Allah, The Almighty, created the heavens and earth; then its sacredness was concealed and maintained as such until the time of Ibraaheem (peace be upon him). Then, He made it appear and made it known to others, not that He initiated its sanctity at that moment. Another possible interpretation is that the consecration was attributed to Ibraaheem (peace be upon him) in as much as he conveyed it, because The Lawgiver of every law and ruling is Allah, The Almighty; and His Prophets convey them. Moreover, just as they are attributed to Allah, The Almighty with respect to Him being the Lawgiver; it is attributed to the messengers because the laws are heard from them and are conveyed and made clear by their tongues.
The Prophet ﷺ then relates that fighting is not permissible within the Sacred Precinct for anyone before him ﷺ. Allah, The Mighty and Majestic had only designated that for him except that it was only for an hour of the day. Thereafter, the sanctity of Makkah returned just as it was. So it is, and always will be a holy place with Allah’s sanctity until the Day of Resurrection. There is a reason explaining this exception which has been narrated in Saheeh al-Bukhaaree and Saheeh Muslim, and that is due to: “some people from the Khuzaa‘ah tribe had killed a man from the tribe of Banee Layth during the Year of the Conquest of Makkah as an act of retaliation for someone they had killed. This incident was then reported to the Messenger of Allah (ﷺ). Thereupon, he (ﷺ)mounted his camel and delivered an address, saying: ‘Verily, Allah, The Mighty and Majestic held back the elephant from Makkah, and made His Messenger and believers prevail over them.” That is to say: ‘Allah prevented and safeguarded Makkah from the elephant of Abrahah al-Habashee who brought it along to destroy the Ka’bah. And He granted His Messenger, Muhammad, and His Companions (ras) the power to triumph over their dominion and overcome their people.’ Then, he ﷺ elaborated on the sanctity of this city further by saying: “its thorns shall not be severed”, i.e., ‘...shall not be cut.’ The mention of thorns is an indication that something else which does not cause harm is more likely, as this is something which specifically brings about harm. With that said, it is permissible to cut or uproot it, as seen by analogy when we compare it to the permissibility of killing the five noxious types of animals, all of which are pernicious in one form or another, in the Sanctuary of Makkah. In a narration transmitted in Saheeh al-Bukhaaree and Saheeh Muslim, a different wording in the hadeeth can be seen as follows: “..its shrubbery shall not be cut.” So, their branches may not be broken or cut.
“...and its game shall not be startled or caused to flee”, meaning, that its game shall not be driven away from its place or be bothered, and it is not permissible to hunt them.
“...and items which are lost and found (i.e., luqatah) may not be picked up by anyone, except by one who would announce it publicly.” So, one cannot use or acquire something which has been lost or left behind by somebody in Makkah as one can doat places other than Makkah; except by someone who announces it publicly and declares that he has it in his possession until its owner comes and retrieves it; and lastly, that the individual does not pick it up take it for the sake of ownership. The luqatah is something, such as lost money, which a person finds on the road and its owner is not known.
“...and its lush herbage shall be cut or removed.” Thus, its plants, its trees - whether they be old or young, nor the short, lush, and moist herbage should not be cut or uprooted.
Then, al-‘Abbaas, the narrator’s father (ras), urged that the Prophet ﷺto permit them to cultivate and use ithkhir, which is a broad-leaved herbaceous plant that belongs to the Poaceae couch grass family. It has a fragrant, lemony scent; and its flowers are used as an infusion in drinks, such as tea.
“..for it is utilized by their qayn.” The Arabic word: qayn, that is mentioned in this hadeeth means blacksmiths; and in the past, they used the ithkhir when kindling the fire. It was useful for them in burning it, without the need of using firewood, which is a scarce commodity in the desert. People also used it for roofing their homes, as well as their graves. The idea here being that the ithkhir was used for their homes during their life and death. Then, The Prophet ﷺresponded to him regarding that and permitted them to cultivate and use the blessed plant.
This hadeeth shows that Allah, The Almighty glorifies and venerates the honourable city of Makkah. And fighting therein is prohibited. And it shows that Makkah was conquered by force, not by peace..

1836

Narrated Ibn Buhaynah (ra): The Prophet (ﷺ), while in the state of Ihraam, was cupped at the middle of his head at Lahaa Jamal.
.

Commentary : Allah, The Mighty and Majestic, and His Messenger ﷺhave explained what is permissible for the one who has assumed Ihraam to partake in, and what is prohibited to him. And all this have been transmitted to us by The Noble Companions (ras).
In this hadeeth, ‘Abdullah ibn Buhaynah (ra) reports that the Prophet ﷺgot himself cupped while he was dressed in the garments for the consecrated state one enters for Hajj or ‘Umrah. The cupping (i.e., hijaamah) was done at the middle of his ﷺnoble head. Cupping is one of the medical methods used in extracting bad blood from the body for treatment. The narrator’s statement: “at Lahaa Jamal” refers to a place along the route to Makkah and is about seven miles away from al-Madeenah.
This hadeeth highlights that the one in Ihraam is allowed to seek medical treatment from whatever disease or malady that may present itself in his body; with the hope that the permissible medicines and treatments will ward what is disliked or harmful from the body..

1837

Narrated Ibn ‘Abbaas (ra): The Prophet (ﷺ) marriedMaymoonah (raa) while he was in the state of Ihraam.
.

Commentary : Allah, The Mighty and Majestic, and His Messenger ﷺhave explained what is permissible for the one who is in the state of Ihraam to partake in, and what is prohibited to him. And all this have been transmitted to us by the noble Companions (ras).
In this hadeeth, ‘Abdullah ibn ‘Abbaas (ra) narrates that the Prophet ﷺmarried The Mother of the Believers, Maymoonah bint al-Haarith al-Hilaaliyyah (raa) while he ﷺwas in the state of Ihraam for ‘Umrah. This exemplifiesthe permissibility of marrying while in a state of Ihraam, whereas it has been proven by other reports that the Prophet ﷺforbade marriage while one being in a state of Ihraam. One of which has been transmitted in Saheeh Muslim, in a report narrated by ‘Uthmaan ibn ‘Affaan (ra) who states that the Prophet ﷺ said: “The one who is in the state of Ihraam may not marry, nor offer someone in marriage, nor seek a betrothal.” Also, Maymoonah (raa) herself had narrated that the Prophet ﷺ married her when it was permissible to do so, as transmitted in Saheeh Muslim. It has been said that: Maymoonah (raa) was more knowledgeable over the matter than anyone else and had reported on her status and how the matter was dealt with regarding that contract. For that reason, it is more befitting to accept her hadeeth more than the hadeeth of Ibn ‘Abbaas (ra); since she was the most knowledgeable about her status and that of the Prophet ﷺ, especially when we consider that she mentioned the location of where the contract and marriage had occurred.
It was said that the hadeeth of Ibn ‘Abbaas may be understood as saying that the Prophet ﷺmarried her (raa) within the sanctuary of Makkah or during a sacred month, which is permissible to do so. The Arabic word that often refers to the one who is within the sanctuary of Makkah or in any of the sacred months is the word: muhrim, even if the person is not in a state of Ihraam. This term is a common and well-known aspect of the language. And others offered different interpretations. .

1838

Narrated ‘Abdullah ibn ‘Umar (ra): A man stood up and asked, "O Allah's Messenger! What clothes may be worn in the state of Ihraam?" The Prophet (ﷺ) replied, "Do not wear long flowing shirts or trousers, or turbans, or a hooded cloak; but if somebody has no shoes, he can wear leather stockings provided they are cut short off the ankles, and also, do not wear anything perfumed with al-wars or saffron, and the woman in the state of Ihraam may not ear niqaab, or wear gloves."
.

Commentary : Allah The Mighty and Majestic, and His Messenger (ﷺ) have clarified what is permissible for the pilgrim to partake in, and what is prohibited to him. And all this has been transmitted to us by the noble Companions (ras).

In this hadeeth, ‘Abdullah ibn ‘Umar (ra) mentions that a man came to the Prophet (ﷺ)and asked him what garments should be worn while one is in the consecrated state (i.e., Ihraam) for Hajj or ‘Umrah. The Prophet (ﷺ)responded to him by mentioning which types of clothes are impermissible to be worn, because the items that are forbidden is limited, so they can be clarified well enough. As for things that are permissible in the state of Ihraam, they are more numerous than those that are restricted. For that reason, the Prophet ﷺdid not list or make a reference to that which is impermissible during the state of Ihraam when mentioning what is prohibited. It is as if he ﷺwanted to say to him, just avoid these things, and feel free to wear anything else.

The Messenger of Allah ﷺmentioned what was prohibited and began by saying: “Do not wear the long flowing shirt (i.e., qamees)” which is a garment that is tailor-made to go over the body and has sleeves. It is put on from above, so it goes over the two arms, and covers the body and private areas.

As for the trouser, it is a piece of clothing which mostly covers what is between the naval to the two knees. It surrounds each one of the legs separately and is worn on from the bottom part of the body, in which the feet enter first, and covers the private areas, and the surrounding area above it a bit.

The turban is a long piece of cloth that is wrapped around the head. As for the hooded cloak, in English, it is also known as a burnoose. It is a garment that surrounds the head and body. The Arabic term, burnos, that is used in this hadeeth is often used to refer to any type of garment to which a hood is attached to it.

The pilgrim also should not wear khuffs, which is worn over the feet as a covering, is made out of leather (these are most commonly known as leather socks) and differs from a pair of leather sandals (i.e., na’l) - as these do not cover the feet, nor the upper side of them. The Messenger of Allah ﷺsaid: “...except the one who does not own any sandals. He may wear the leather socks, on condition that he cuts them below the ankles.” With that said, if one wants to wear the khuffs - provided that he does not own a pair of sandals - then he must cut them so that they are lower than the point of the ankles; in order to bring them closer in appearance to sandals. For clarification, the ankle point being addressed here is where the protruding bones occur at the connection point between the lower leg and foot. These afore-mentioned things are prohibitions which are pertinent to men, and not women.

The Prophet ﷺthen added: “Do not wear anything which has been touched or perfumed by saffron or al-wars.” Saffron are pleasant-smelling plants which were used as a perfume, and dye in previous times. As for al-wars, they are yellowish, sweet-smelling plants from Yemen that possess a substance which is used to dye clothes. This prohibition is applicable to both men and women.

He ﷺthen said: “...and the woman who is in the consecrated state for pilgrimage shall not veil her face, nor wear gloves.” The niqaab is a veil which drops down over the face, or under the eyes, so that the woman may cover her face and open her eyes to the point that she can see. The gloves being discussed here refer to anything that women would wear on their hands, and covers the fingers, palms, and forearms.

What is meant here is that it is prohibited for women in Ihraam to wear a niqaab and gloves. As for anything other than the niqaab and gloves, which cover the face and hands, such as the khimaar (i.e., a veil that is worn by women that covers the whole face, including the eyes) and the like. A woman may cover her face and hands with khimaar in the presence of non-mahram men, regardless of whether they are near or opposite of them; as narrated by Al-Haakim in his work, al-Mustadrak, on the authority of ‘Asmaa’ bint Abee Bakr (raa) who relates that she used to cover her face while in a consecrated state for pilgrimage. The text in this hadeeth specifically forbids a woman from wearing a face veil or gloves, not from the act of covering the face and hands itself.

One benefit that we can conclude from this hadeeth is that it highlights that we should try in earnest to offer more information than that which is requested by the inquirer, so it serves his best benefit..

1839

Narrated by Ibn ‘Abbaas (ra): A man was crushed to death by his she-camel and was brought to Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) who said, "Give him a bath and shroud him, but do not cover his head, and do not bring any perfume near to him, as he will be resurrected reciting Talbiyah."
.

Commentary : The Day of Resurrection is the day of recompense for one’s deeds and intentions in this worldly abode, and the reward for them will equate to the deed. Allah, The Almighty, will resurrect every human in accordance with the belief or deeds they had when he died, and He will recompense them for it respectively.

In this hadeeth, ‘Abdullah ibn ‘Abbaas (ra) reports that a man on pilgrimage was crushed by his she-camel. That is to say that his neck was broken after he fell from on top of his mount. This occurred on the Day of ‘Arafah, on the Farewell Pilgrimage in the tenth year after Hijrah, as has been transmitted in a narration found in both Saheeh al-Bukhaaree and Saheeh Muslim. So, they brought him to the Prophet ﷺto ask him how to wash and shroud him. The Prophet ﷺ told them to wash and shroud him, which is a matter that all of the deceased have in common. Then, he ﷺmade special mention of two legal rulings which differ from the rest that are applicable to the rest of the deceased Muslims; and these exceptions are: that they do not cover his head, and that they do not place any perfume on him.

Then, the Prophet ﷺexplained that he will be resurrected on the Day of Resurrection as a pilgrim reciting the Talbiyah; i.e., that he will be raising his voice and reciting “LabbaykAllahummaLabbayk!” - “Here I am, O Lord, Here I am! - ; this is because the person will be resurrected as he was at death, the consecrated state of pilgrimage (i.e., ihraam) he was in prior did not cease at his death. As such, this is the legal ruling for every pilgrim who dies while in a state of Ihraam.

One benefit that we can derive from this hadeeth is that we should not adorn perfume or cover the heads of those who are in the state of Ihraam; as well as for those who have died while in a state of Ihraam..

1840

Narrated ‘Abdullah ibn Hunayn: `Abdullah ibn Al-Abbaas and Al-Miswar ibn Makhramah differed at Al-Abwaa; Ibn `Abbaas said that a person who is in state of Ihraam is allowed to wash his head; while Al-Miswar maintained that he should not do so. `Abdullah bin `Abbaas (ra) sent me to Aboo Ayyoob Al-Ansaaree (ra) and I found him bathing between the two wooden posts (of the well) and was screened with a sheet of cloth. I greeted him and he asked who I was. I replied, "I am `Abdullah bin Hunayn and I have been sent to you by Ibn `Abbaas to ask you how Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) used to wash his head while in the state of Ihraam." Aboo Ayyoob Al-Ansaaree caught hold of the sheet of cloth and lowered it till his head appeared before me, and then told somebody to pour water on his head. He poured water on his head, and then rubbed his head with his hands by bringing them from back to front and from front to back and said, "I saw the Prophet (ﷺ) doing like this."
.

Commentary : The Companions (ras) sometimes differed on some issues, however, they used to treat one another with respect when they disagreed over matters as the Prophet ﷺtaught them.

In this hadeeth, the Taabi’ee (i.e. one who comes from the generation after the Companions) ‘Abdullah ibn Hunayn reports that a disagreement arose between two renowned Companions - and two being regarded are: ‘Abdullah ibn ‘Abbaas and al-Miswar ibn Makhramah (ras) - on the permissibility of the ones in Ihraam washing their head while they were camped at al-Abwaa’, which is a region between Makkah and al-Madeenah, and is situated about 250 kms southwest of al-Madeenah, and it is the site where the Prophet’s ﷺmother is buried.

Ibn ‘Abbaas (ra) was of the opinion that it is permissible for a person in Ihraam to wash his head during Hajj or ‘Umrah. As for al-Miswar (ra), he was of the opinion that it was not, so they both elected to seek out Aboo Ayyoob al-Ansaaree (ra)for his counsel on the issue. They sent ‘Abdullah ibn Hunayn to him. He found him bathing between two posts; that is to say: between two posts of a well which has been built and encased on all of its sides, on which a beam was placed between the two posts and had a wheel pulley affixed to it.

Aboo Ayoob (ra) was concealed by a garment of some sort while he was bathing. ‘Abdullah greeted him, introduced himself, and asked him how the Messenger of Allah ﷺwashed his head while in the consecrated state for Ihraam. It is possible that the reason he asked him about the manner in which he ﷺ did it, and not whether he did it or not, is that he saw Aboo Ayoob taking a bath while he was in a state of Ihraam; therefore, he understood that it was permissible. However, he desired nothing more than to return with another benefit; hence, he asked Aboo Ayoob (raa) about how he ﷺ washed up. Aboo Ayoob (ra) answered his question by demonstrating the answer through his actions - which is more impactful than words - so, he placed his hand over the garment that he was screening himself with and brought it down and lowered it until his head appeared. Then, he requested someone to pour water over it, and said: “Pour it” to the person nearby. So, the individual poured the water over his head. Then, he moved both of his hands from the front, and turned them around in reverse over his head. That is to say, he moved both hands from the front of his head to the back, and then went back with them another time towards the front of his head. Then, he told ‘Abdullah ibn Hunayn that he saw the Prophet ﷺwash his head in this manner.

There is no doubt that for the one in Ihraam who had a night emission, it is incumbent upon him to perform a ghusl, which is a full body purification completed by washing over their entire body. However, it seemed that al-Miswar's (ra) dispute was perhaps because he considered concealing the head near water tantamount to covering the head with garments and the like, which is impermissible for the one in a state of Ihraam. Or, he may have feared that when the one in Ihraam washed his head that some hair would fall out; and the one who is in the consecrated state of Ihraam is prohibited from removing his hair. In any case, Aboo Ayoob (ra) explained the method of how the Prophet ﷺ washed his head while in a state of Ihraam, which is the observed Sunnah of the Messenger of Allah ﷺ.

Two benefits we can derive from this hadeeth is that it shows how the Companions (ras) returned to the evidence as testified in the Sunnah and left their own opinions and independent legal judgements over the matter. And that when the Companions (ras) disagreed over an issue, their evidence was not something that one of them said or contrived of if it was not supported with evidence which from the Quran or the Sunnah of the Prophet ﷺ..

1841

Narrated Ibn ‘Abbaas (ra): I heard the Prophet (ﷺ) delivering a sermon at `Arafaat saying, " Whoever cannot find a pair of sandals (i.e., na‘l), then let him wear khuffs, and whoever cannot find an Izaar, let him wear some trousers."
.

Commentary : Allah, The Mighty and Majestic, and His Messenger ﷺhave explained what is permissible for the pilgrim to partake in, and what is prohibited to him. All this has been transmitted to us by the Companions (ras).

In this hadeeth, ‘Abdullah ibn ‘Abbaas (ra) reports that he heard the Prophet ﷺdelivering a sermon at ‘Arafah during the Farewell Pilgrimage in the tenth year after Hijrah. ‘Arafah is a mountain and site where the pilgrims stay on the ninth day of Thoo al-Hijjah, and is approximately 23 kms east of Makkah, and outside its Sacred Precinct.

During his sermon, he ﷺsaid: “Whoever cannot find a pair of sandals (i.e., na‘l), then let him wear khuffs.” The sandal is what is worn on the foot when walking, and every part of the foot is protected from the ground and does not cover the foot for the most part. The khuff is what is worn over the foot, and is made out of a soft, thin leather, and are most commonly known as leather socks in English. They cover the ankles and more. The person in Ihraam may wear it after he cuts them below the ankles - for clarification, the ankle point being addressed here is where the protruding bones occur at the connection point between the lower leg and foot- as what has been transmitted in a narration reported by Ibn ‘Umar (ra) in Saheeh al-Bukhaaree and Saheeh Muslim.

The Prophet ﷺsaid: “And whoever cannot find an izaar, let him wear some trousers.” The izaar is a piece of cloth which is tightened around the waist and covers what is between the navel and knees. And trousers are a medium sized garment which mostly covers what is between the navel and knees. It surrounds each one of the legs separately and is worn on from the bottom part of the body, in which the feet enter first, and covers the private areas, and the surrounding area above it a bit. The Prophet ﷺ permitted the wearing of trousers for those who cannot find an izaar to wear. But, if he comes across an izaar or sandals, then it is not permissible for him to wear them.

One benefit that we can conclude from this hadeeth is learning that Islam grants ease and removes difficulties for those who are legally accountable for their actions..

1844

Narrated Al-Baraa (ra): The Prophet (ﷺ) assumedIhraam for ‘Umrah in the month of Thoo al-Qa'dah but the people of Makkah refused to admit him into Makkah till he agreed on the condition that he would not bring into Makkah any arms but sheathed.
.

Commentary : The Hajj and ‘Umrah are some of the greatest acts of worship for which the Messenger of Allah ﷺwas keen on, and there were many times in which he ﷺ performed ‘Umrah.

In this hadeeth, al-Baraa’ ibn ‘Aazib (ra) reports that the Prophet ﷺhad left to perform ‘Umrah in the month of Thoo al-Qa‘dah in the year of al-Hudaybiyah, which is the truce pact that occurred in the sixth year after Hijrah; when the polytheists denied the Messenger of Allah ﷺ and Muslims the ability to leave from there and enter Makkah to perform the ‘Umrah. The Prophet ﷺmade an agreement with them to allow him to return for ‘Umrah the following year. The Prophet’s concord with them mandated that he could enter the city to perform ‘Umrah the next year without carrying arms, and that they only enter with their swords sheathed in their scabbards as a sign for peace; due to them entering a treaty. This has been called the Made Up ‘Umrah and the ‘Umrah of the Judgment because he ﷺforced Quraysh to accept the terms of the treaty that was signed there, and not because it had been performed as a make-up for the ‘Umrah which was prevented in the previous year.

This hadeeth shows that it is permissible for the one in Ihraam to carry arms when necessary..

1471

Ibn ‘Umar reported that he divorced his wife during her menstruation in the Prophet's lifetime. So, ‘Umar ibn al-Khattāb asked the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) about that and the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) said: "Order him to take her back and keep her until she attains purity, then menstruates, then attains purity. Then, if he wishes he may keep her, and if he wishes he may divorce her before having intercourse with her. This is the ‘Iddah (waiting period) that Allah Almighty has ordered for the divorce of women." [Another version reads]: That he divorced his wife during her menstruation, once. So, the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) commanded him to take her back and keep her until she attains purity, then menstruates again, while still being with him, then to give her time until she attains purity from her menstruation. After that, if he wanted to divorce her, he could do so when she becomes pure before having sexual intercourse with her, as this is the ‘iddah that Allah commanded for the divorce of women. [Another version reads]: On being asked about this, ‘Abdullah said to someone: "If you divorced your wife once or twice, the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) commanded me to do this. However, if you have divorced her thrice, she became forbidden to you until she is married to another man, and you have disobeyed Allah regarding what He commanded you in divorcing your wife.".

Commentary : The legislated divorce is that one divorces his wife one time while being pure (of her menses) without having sexual intercourse with her during this period of purity. It is called Talāq Sunni (Sunnah-compliant divorce). As for the forbidden divorce, it is to divorce one's wife more than once in one utterance, or to divorce her during her menstruation, or during a period of purity in which he had sexual intercourse with her. This is called Talāq Bid‘i (Heretic divorce).
In this Hadīth, ‘Abdullah ibn ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him and his father) narrates that he divorced his wife - her name was Āminah bint Ghifār, and it was said: Āminah bint ‘Ammār, and there are other opinions as well - during her menstruation before attaining purity, and that was in the Prophet's lifetime. His father, ‘Umar ibn al-Khattāb, went to the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) and asked him about the ruling on this divorce that occurred during menstruation, whether it is permissible or not, and whether it counts or not. The Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) commanded him to order his son, ‘Abdullah, to take her back in marriage and keep her with him "until she attains purity" from the menstruation in which he divorced her, "then menstruates" again, "then attains purity" from the second menstruation. After attaining purity from the second menstruation, he could keep her as his wife if he wished or he could divorce her in the second period of purity before having intercourse with her. This state, namely the state of purity, is the time for starting "the ‘Iddah that Allah Almighty has commanded for the divorce," i.e., during which, "women", as Allah Almighty says: {O Prophet, when you [believers] divorce women, divorce them with concern to their waiting period.} [Surat at-Talāq: 1] That is to say, divorce them while receiving their ‘Iddah, i.e., at the time they could start the ‘Iddah, and the period of menstruation is not counted in the ‘Iddah. So, if one divorces during this time, his divorce does not occur in the state commanded by Allah, which is starting and entering the ‘Iddah, when the divorce occurs during the period of her purity not during the period of her menstruation. This is because, during the purity period, she can keep an accurate count of her ‘Iddah, which is three Qurū’ (menstrual cycles), and "qur’" is purity, and it was said: menstruation.
In another version, Muhammad ibn Rumh - one of the Hadīth narrators - added: Whenever ‘Abdullah ibn ‘Umar was asked about divorcing a woman during menstruation, he would say to the questioner: If you divorced your wife once or twice then take her back, as the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) commanded me to do so. However, if you divorced her thrice then this is an irrevocable divorce and you cannot take her back and she becomes forbidden for you "until she is married to another man," and he has sexual intercourse with her and then divorces her. After her ‘Iddah is over, she becomes lawful for you again to marry.
And by doing this, you disobeyed Allah and went against Him "regarding what He commanded you in divorcing your wife" during the purity state in which you had intercourse with her, as Allah Almighty says: {O Prophet, when you [believers] divorce women, divorce them with concern to their waiting period.} [Surat at-Talāq: 1]
This clarifies that the divorce counts, whether it is Sunni or Bid‘i. The fact that the Bid‘i divorce is forbidden does not entail that it does not occur. It only means that whoever does this deliberately is considered sinful, yet the divorce still counts.
In a version of Muslim, Anas ibn Sīrīn said to Ibn ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him and his father): "Was that divorce that you gave her when she was menstruating counted as such?" and you considered it one of the three divorces. "‘Abdullah ibn ‘Umar said: Why would I not count it? (It must be counted) even if I failed and acted foolishly," i.e, failed to fulfill an obligation or acted foolishly and did not fulfill it, or failed to take her back and acted foolishly. Would that be an excuse for him, or would his foolishness make it not count, or would his failure invalidate it?! It is a question of disapproval whose answer is supposed to be: Yes, it is counted, and his failure and foolishness do not prevent it from being counted.
The Hadīth indicates the keenness of Islam to restrict the circumference of divorce as much as possible, and if it happens, it does not cause harm to any of the spouses.
It also indicates that the husband alone has the right to Raj‘ah (taking the wife back) without the guardian..

1472

Ibn ‘Abbās reported: The triple divorce during the lifetime of the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) and that of Abu Bakr and two years of the caliphate of ‘Umar was counted as one. Then ‘Umar ibn al-Khattāb said: "Indeed, people have hastened to a matter regarding which they used to act with deliberation. So, if we would make them count (as three divorces)," and he did that..

Commentary : Allah Almighty has made divorce a kind of respite between the spouses when life between them becomes impossible. In Islam, divorce has certain criteria and results in a number of rights.
In this Hadīth, ‘Abdullah ibn ‘Abbās (may Allah be pleased with him) narrates: During the lifetime of the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) and that of Abu Bakr and two years of ‘Umar's caliphate, whoever triply divorced his wife in one session or in one time, would count as a single divorce. An example of this is saying: "You are divorced thrice," or saying: "You are divorced. You are divorced. You are divorced." Then the husband can take his wife back during the period of ‘Iddah (waiting period) without a new contract. If the ‘Iddah is over, he can take her back with a new contract. It is not counted as three divorces that would make his wife unlawful for him until she is married to another man. It is deemed to refer to what was most likely meant, which was the intent of confirmation, not for continuing the count. During the lifetime of ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him), people used this form frequently while most likely intending to continue the count not by way of confirmation. Hence, ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him) made it count as three divorces. He said: "Indeed, people have hastened to a matter regarding which they used to act with deliberation," i.e., they were entitled to three divorces to give themselves a chance to reconsider their affairs, as it might seem better for them to take their wives back. His saying: "So if we made them count," i.e., He consulted those who were with him from the Companions (may Allah be pleased with them) regarding the one who gave three divorces all at once to make such a divorce an irrevocable triple divorce as he uttered, to deter them from rushing into divorce. Thus, he enforced it on people after consulting the senior Companions and their agreement with him.
This is interpreted from him (may Allah be pleased with him) as a form of Ijtihād and laying down rules that would bring benefit to his subjects within the boundaries of Shariah, without making things too difficult or too easy..

1476

‘Ā’ishah reported: The Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) used to seek our permission on the day he had to stay with one of his wives (by turns) after the following verse was revealed: {You [O Prophet] may postpone [the turn of] whoever you wish [of your wives], and you may share your time with whoever of them you wish.} [Surat al-Ahzāb: 51] Mu‘ādhah said to her: What did you use to say to the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) when he asked your permission? She said: I used to say: Were it up to me, I would not give anyone preference over myself..

Commentary : The Prophet's wives loved him dearly to the extent that they used to compete to please him and show their love to him.
In this Hadīth, the Mother of the Believers ‘Ā’ishah (may Allah be pleased with her) reports that the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) used to ask permission from his wife, whose turn was due, to go to another one of his wives. The Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) had nine wives, and he used to allocate a day for each to stay with her overnight. This act of his seeking permission was after the revelation of the following verse: {You [O Prophet] may postpone [the turn of] whoever you wish [of your wives], and you may share your time with whoever of them you wish, and there is no blame on you if you call back any of those whose turn you have set aside. That is more likely that they will be content and not distressed, and that they will be satisfied with what you give them all. Allah knows what is in your hearts, and Allah is All-Knowing, Most Forbearing.} [Surat al-Ahzāb: 51] This verse means: O Messenger, you have the right to delay the turn of whoever you wish of your wives and not stay overnight with her, and you have the right to share your time with whoever you wish of them and stay overnight with her; and there is no blame on you if you call back any of those whom you have delayed. Giving you the choice and making things flexible for you are more likely to make your wives content and satisfied with what you give them all for knowing that you have not neglected duty and have not withheld a right, and Allah knows what is in your hearts - O men - of inclination to some women apart from others, as Allah is All-Knowing of His slaves' actions and nothing thereof is hidden from Him, and He is Most Forbearing and does not hasten to punish them hoping that they may return to Him in repentance.
The female Tābi‘i Mu‘ādhah al-‘Adawiyyah asked ‘Ā’ishah (may Allah be pleased with her): "What did you use to say to the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) when he asked for your permission?" ‘Ā’ishah (may Allah be pleased with her) replied that she used to say to the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him): "Were it up to me," i.e., if this act of seeking permission is in my hands, "I would not give anyone preference over myself," i.e., I would not give my day to another wife. This was due to her love to be close to the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) to serve him, enjoy intimacy with him, and benefit from him.
Such a competition between his wives was not for mere pleasure, intimacy, personal desires, and enjoyment, as is the case with some people. Instead, it was a competition for matters related to the Hereafter and for being close to the master of the first and the last, for expecting the descent of mercy and revelation upon him while being with her and so on.
The Hadīth clarifies one of the Prophet's exclusive rights, namely choosing whomever he wished from his wives whenever he wished.
It also points out some of the etiquettes between spouses and teaches them how a man should seek his wives' permission when sharing his time with them and how the woman should show him love and affection..

1478

Jābir ibn ‘Abdullah reported: Abu Bakr (may Allah be pleased with him) came and sought permission to see the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him). He found people sitting at his door and none amongst them had been granted permission, but it was granted to Abu Bakr and he went in. Then came ‘Umar and he sought permission and it was granted to him. He found the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) sitting sad and silent with his wives around him, and said: He said: I would say something that would make the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) laugh. So, he said: "O Messenger of Allah, I wish you had seen the daughter of Khārijah when she asked me for extra money, and I got up and slapped her on the neck. The Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) laughed and said: "They are around me as you see, asking for extra money." So, Abu Bakr got up and slapped ‘Ā’ishah on the neck, and ‘Umar got up and slapped Hafsah on the neck. Both of them did this saying: "Are you asking the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) what he does not have?!" They said: "By Allah, we would never ask the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) for something that he does not have." Then he retreated from them for a month or for twenty-nine days. Then, the following verse was revealed to him: {O Prophet, tell your wives} until the part that reads {for those who do good among you a great reward.} [Surat al-Azāb: 28-29] He said: So, he started with ‘Ā’ishah, saying: "O ‘Ā’ishah, I want to propound something to you but I wish you not to be hasty concerning it until you consult your parents." She said: "What is that, O Messenger of Allah?" So he recited the verse to her. She said: "Is it concerning you, O Messenger of Allah, that I should consult my parents?! Nay, I choose Allah, His Messenger, and the Final Abode; but I ask you not to tell any of your wives what I have said." He said: "None of them asks me except that I will inform her. Allah did not send me to be harsh, or cause harm, but He sent me to teach and make things easy.".

Commentary : The Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) was generous with his wives and provided for them from what Allah granted him. However, he used to spend often on the cause of Allah and on what would benefit people, leaving only a little for himself and his family. This led to some harm felt by his wives; however, Allah Almighty gave them the choice to either endure life patiently or get a divorce and be separated from him kindly.
In this Hadīth, Jābir ibn ‘Abdullah (may Allah be pleased with him and his father) narrates: Abu Bakr (may Allah be pleased with him) once came and sought permission to see the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) and found people sitting at his door and none among them was granted permission to see the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him). Then, the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) granted Abu Bakr (may Allah be pleased with him) permission and he entered. Then, ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him) came to the Prophet's house and sought permission to enter and he permitted him. On entering, ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him) found the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) sitting with his wives around him and he was intensely sad, so much so that he stopped talking. So, ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him) said to himself - and it was said: The speaker was Abu Bakr - (may Allah be pleased with him): "I should say something that would make the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) laugh." So, he said: "O Messenger of Allah, I wish you had seen," i.e., if you knew that my wife, the daughter of Khārijah, asked and requested from me an extra amount of money, more than the usual or more than needed, so I got up and "slapped her on the neck," i.e., hit her neck with my hand. So, the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) laughed out of the resemblance between his condition and that of ‘Umar. The Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) said: "They", referring to his wives, are sitting "around me as you see, asking for extra money" and requesting more money than the usual amount. When the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) said this, Abu Bakr (may Allah be pleased with him) got up and went to ‘Ā’ishah (may Allah be pleased with her) to slap her on the neck by way of discipline. ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him) also got up to slap his daughter Hafsah (may Allah be pleased with her) on the neck by way of discipline, and each of them was saying to his daughter: "Are you asking the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) for what he does not have?!" It was an expression of rebuke and reprimand for them because of their asking for an extra amount of money while the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) did not have it. "They said: By Allah, we would never ask the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him)," after this "something that he does not have." The Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) got angry because of this and he retreated from his wives for thirty or twenty-nine days without entering their houses or approaching them. Then, the following verses were revealed: {O Prophet, tell your wives, “If you seek the life of this world and its embellishments, then come, I will give you provision and release you graciously. But if you seek Allah and His Messenger and the Final Abode, then Allah has prepared for those who do good among you a great reward.”} [Surat al-Ahzāb: 28-29] The two verses mean: O Prophet, tell your wives when they ask you for an increase in sustenance and you have nothing to give them as an extra amount: If you seek the life of this world and its embellishments, then come I will give you provision that is given to the divorced women and release you in a way that involves no harm or damage. However, if you seek Allah's pleasure and the pleasure of His Messenger, and you seek Paradise in the Final Abode, then endure your conditions patiently, as Allah has prepared for those who do good among you, through patience and good treatment, a great reward.
The Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) started with ‘Ā’ishah (may Allah be pleased with her) in giving her the choice. He called her and informed her that he had something to propound to her and that he wished she would not hasten to give him a reply without consulting her parents. Perhaps this was out of fear for her because of her young age which entailed the desire for worldly embellishments and her not choosing the Hereafter. She asked the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) about that matter and he recited the verse to her, so she hastened to accept being with the Messenger of Allah, and she said: "Is it concerning you," i.e., being separated from you, or staying with you, or regarding your right, "O Messenger of Allah, that I should consult my parents?!" And she told him that she chose Allah, His Messenger, and the Final Abode. She also asked him (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) not to tell any of his wives about her reply out of her jealousy and keenness to have the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) all for herself and enjoy a great deal of his company. In response, he (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) said: "None of them asks me except that I will inform her," to help her make her choice. He justified this by saying that Allah did not send him to be harsh, i.e., causing someone to be in a difficult situation and "‘anat", meaning difficulty and sin as well, "or cause harm," i.e., seek others' mistakes. "But He sent me to teach" people goodness and make things easy. Facilitation here lies in the fact that if he informed them, his other wives would follow the example of ‘Ā’ishah (may Allah be pleased with her) and it would be easy for them to choose Allah Almighty, His Messenger (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him), and the Final Abode.
This Hadīth points out that asking permission is from the Prophet's guidance.
It also indicates that one can discipline one's child, even if he grew up.
It shows the ascetic life of the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) and his abstention from worldly life.
It also demonstrates how the Companions used to console the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) in his sadness.
It denotes the merit of Abu Bakr, ‘Umar, and ‘Ā’ishah (may Allah be pleased with them)..

1479

‘Umar ibn al-Khattāb reported: When the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) secluded himself from his wives, he ('Umar) said: I entered the mosque and found the people pelting the ground with pebbles and saying: The Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) divorced his wives, and that was before they were commanded with Hijāb. ‘Umar said: I said: I must find this out today. He said: I entered upon ‘Ā’ishah and said: O daughter of Abu Bakr, have you gone to the extent of giving trouble to the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him)?! She said: O Ibn al-Khattāb, stay out of my affairs and mind your receptacle. He said: So, I entered upon Hafsah bint ‘Umar and said to her: O Hafsah, have you gone to the extent of giving trouble to the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him)?! By Allah, you know that the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) does not love you, and had it not been for me, the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) would have divorced you. So, she wept bitterly. I said to her: Where is the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him)? She said: He is in his cabinet in the attic room. I went there and found Rabāh, the servant of the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him), sitting on the attic's doorstep with his legs dangling on carved wood, which is a trunk used by the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) to ascend and descend. I called out: O Rabāh, seek permission for me from the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him). Rabāh looked at the room then looked at me and said nothing. Then, I said: O Rabāh, seek permission for me from the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him). Rabāh looked at the room then looked at me and said nothing. Then, I raised my voice and said: O Rabāh, seek permission for me from the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him). I think the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) thought I had come for Hafsah's sake. By Allah, if the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) commands me to strike her neck, I will undoubtedly strike her neck. I raised my voice, and he signaled to me to ascend. I entered upon the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) while he was lying on a straw mat. I sat down and he drew up his lower garment over him and he had nothing else on him, and the mat had left marks on his side. I looked around in the cabinet of the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) and found only a handful of barley around one Sā‘ and an equal quantity of the leaves of mimosa flava placed in one side of the room, and a semi-tanned leather bag hanging. He said: Tears started falling from my eyes. He said: O Ibn al-Khattāb, what makes you weep? I said: O Prophet of Allah, how could I not weep when this straw mat has left marks on your side and I see nothing in your cabinet except what I have seen, while Caesar and Khosrau are enjoying fruits and rivers, whereas you are the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) and His chosen one and this is your cabinet?! He said: O Ibn al-Khattāb, does it not please you that the Hereafter is for us and the worldly life is for them? I said: Yes. He said: When I entered upon him, I saw signs of anger on his face, so I said: O Messenger of Allah, what trouble have the women caused you? If you had divorced them, verily, Allah is with you, His angels, Jibrīl (Gabriel), Mikā’īl (Michael), I, Abu Bakr, and the believers are with you. I rarely spoke - thanks to Allah - any words except that I hoped Allah would confirm the words I uttered, and this verse, Āyat at-Takhyīr (the Verse of Choice), was revealed: {Perhaps, if he were to divorce you all, his Lord would replace you with better wives.} [Surat at-Tahrīm: 5] {But if you insist on conspiring against him, then indeed Allah is his Protector, as well as Gabriel and the righteous believers, and moreover, the angels are his supporters.} [Surat at-Tahrīm: 4] ‘Ā’ishah bint Abi Bakr and Hafsah were cooperating against the rest of the Prophet's wives. I said: O Messenger of Allah, did you divorce them? He said: No. I said: O Messenger of Allah, when I entered the mosque, I found the Muslims pelting the ground with pebbles and saying: The Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) divorced his wives. Should I go down and tell them that you did not divorce them? He said: Yes, if you wish. I kept talking to him until there were no more signs of anger on his face and until he laughed and his teeth showed, and he had the most charming front teeth of all people. Then, the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) descended and I descended while catching hold of the trunk, but the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) went down as if he was walking on the ground without touching it with his hand. I said: O Messenger of Allah, you remained in your room for twenty-nine days. He said: The month consists of twenty-nine days. I, thus, stood at the door of the mosque and called out at the top of my voice: The Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) did not divorce his wives, and this verse was revealed: {Whenever they hear any news of security or fear, they spread it. If they referred it to the Messenger or to those in authority among them, those with sound judgment among them could know it.} [Surat an-Nisā’: 83] And it was I who drew correct conclusions and Allah Almighty revealed the Verse of Choice..

Commentary : Perhaps the Prophet's wives caused him trouble like women usually cause their husbands trouble, resulting from jealousy, vexation, and the like.
In this Hadīth, ‘Umar ibn al-Khattāb (may Allah be pleased with him) narrates that when the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) secluded himself from his wives and swore not to enter upon them, for he was angry with them, ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with them) entered the Prophet's mosque "and found the people pelting the ground with pebbles," i.e., moving them around and throwing them on the ground, which is something normally done by someone concerned and absorbed in thought. "And saying: The Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) divorced his wives," i.e. when they saw how the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) kept himself away from his wives, they thought that he had divorced them, so they said this. "And that was before they were commanded with Hijāb," i.e., women conceal themselves from men. This remark is questionable; rather, it is a clear mistake since Hijāb was enjoined at the time of the Prophet's marriage to Zaynab bint Jahsh (may Allah be pleased with her) in the fourth or fifth year, and Zaynab (may Allah be pleased with her) was among his wives who were given the choice; and the story of his seclusion from his wives and giving them the choice took place in the ninth year of Hijrah. The best thing said with this regard to: "that it was before they were commanded with Hijāb" is from the words of the narrator who, when seeing that 'Umar (may Allah be pleased with him) said he had entered upon 'Ā’ishah (may Allah be pleased with her), thought that this was before Hijāb, so he affirmed it. This could be responded by saying: Entering does not entail removing Hijāb (screen), for he could enter from the door, and she could still talk to him from behind the screen.
Then, ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him) reported that he said to himself: "I must find this out today," i.e., I must find out the truth about this, did the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) divorce them or not? So, ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him) entered upon ‘Ā’ishah (may Allah be pleased with her), the Prophet's wife and Abu Bakr's daughter, and said to her: "O daughter of Abu Bakr, have you gone to the extent of giving trouble to the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him)?!" blaming her for daring to infuriate the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him). ‘Ā’ishah (may Allah be pleased with her) said: "O Ibn al-Khattāb, stay out of my affairs," i.e., you are not entitled to admonish me "and mind your receptacle," i.e., rather, you should admonish the one who matters to you, referring to Hafsah bint ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with her). "‘Aybah" (receptacle): the container used for keeping clothes and precious belongings. A man's "‘aybah": his family and those close to him. Then, ‘Umar entered upon his daughter Hafsah and said to her what he had said to ‘Ā’ishah (may Allah be pleased with them) and added reprovingly: "By Allah, you know that the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) does not love you, and had it not been for me, the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) would have divorced you," deterring and frightening her with divorce and the fact that if it had not been for ‘Umar's special status with the Prophet, this would have occurred. Thereupon, Hafsah cried bitterly because of her sadness about being separated from the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) and expecting her father to be severely mad at her. Then, ‘Umar asked his daughter (may Allah be pleased with both of them) where the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) was. Hafsah (may Allah be pleased with her) said: "He is in his cabinet in the attic room." "Mashrubah" (attic room): is an elevated room for storing food and drink. On entering, 'Umar found Rabāh (may Allah be pleased with him), the Prophet's servant, "sitting on the attic's doorstep," i.e., on the doorsill "with his legs dangling," i.e., stretching and hanging them "on carved wood", which is a trunk that had stairs used by the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) to ascend to the room and descend from that place using it as a stair. ‘Umar, then, called out to Rabāh (may Allah be pleased with both of them) to seek permission for him to enter upon the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him). So, Rabāh looked inside the room, then, looked at ‘Umar and said nothing. This indirectly indicates that the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) had heard ‘Umar's voice; however, he expressed no approval or disapproval of permitting him. So, ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him) again sought permission from the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him), and Rabāh again looked at the room then looked at ‘Umar and said nothing. On the third time, ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him) raised his voice so the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) would hear him and he called out: "O Rabāh, seek permission for me from the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him). I think that the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) thought I had come for Hafsah's sake," i.e., to apologize for what she did and defend her. "By Allah, if the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) commands me to strike her neck, I will certainly strike her neck." This clarified why he sought permission, namely to console the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) and bring him out of his sadness and not for anything related to his daughter Hafsah (may Allah be pleased with her). Rabāh, thus, signaled with his head to ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him) after the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) had permitted him to ascend to him in his attic.
On entering upon the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him), ‘Umar saw him "lying on a straw mat," i.e., lying on his side on the straw mat. Another version in the two "Sahīh Collections" reads: "And he was on a straw mat with nothing between him and the mat," i.e., he was lying thereon without any bedding. "Hasīr" (straw mat): a mat made of palm leaf stalks or others things. 'Umar (may Allah be pleased with him) sat down, so the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) drew up his lower garment over his body to cover it more. "Izār" (lower garment): it is the garment used to cover the lower part of the body. The Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) was not wearing anything except this lower garment. "and the mat had left marks on his side," i.e., it left marks on his side as a result of sleeping on it. 'Umar (may Allah be pleased with him) looked around, exploring the room where the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) was staying and found nothing but a handful - i.e., a pile - of barley equal to one Sā '. Sā‘: it is four Mudds, and one Mudd is equal to an amount that could fill both hands. He found an equal amount of "the leaves of mimosa flava placed in one side of the room," i.e., in one of its sides and at a distance from the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him). It is said that "Qarazh" (mimosa flava) means: a kind of tree used in tanning leather. "And a semi-tanned leather bag hanging," which is leather that is not yet tanned. All this indirectly indicates the threadbareness of the place where the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) was staying and the straitened circumstances he was living in.
‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him) said: "Tears started falling from my eyes," i.e., tears started flowing by way of sympathy for the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him). The Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) asked him about the reason for his weeping, so ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him) replied: "O Prophet of Allah, how could I not weep when this straw mat has left marks on your side and I see nothing in your cabinet except what I see, while Caesar and Khosrau are enjoying fruits and rivers, whereas you are the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) and His chosen one and this is your cabinet?!" All this serves as an indirect reference to the bliss that the disbelievers enjoy compared to the conditions of the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him). What ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him) meant is that the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) and the Muslims are more entitled to this bliss than the disbelievers. Khosrau: it is the title of the Persians' king. Caesar: it is the title of the Romans' king. The Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) said: "O Ibn al-Khattāb, does it not please you that the Hereafter is for us and the worldly life is for them?" In this way, the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) explained to him the logic of the worldly pleasures and that of the Hereafter, as part of Allah's immutable rule regarding His slaves is to make the disbelievers enjoy the worldly pleasures. In contrast, His believing slaves will enjoy the enjoyments of the Hereafter, taking into consideration the contradiction between these two types of pleasures and the believers' eternal abidance in the bliss of Paradise and, on the contrary, the disbelievers' eternal abidance in Hellfire. ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him) said: "Yes" it pleases me, O Messenger of Allah. There were signs of anger on the Prophet's face that ‘Umar noticed the moment he entered, so, ‘Umar said to him: "O Messenger of Allah, what trouble have the women caused you?" He was trying to alleviate the Prophet's sadness and anger. In other words, no trouble will befall you, and you should not care about any of their affairs. "If you had divorced them, verily, Allah is with you, His angels, Jibrīl (Gabriel):" the angel entrusted with the revelation, "Mikā’īl (Michael):" the angel entrusted with the rain and plants, "I, Abu Bakr, and the believers are with you" also with our support and assistance in Da‘wah (call to Allah) and the divine message. ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him) reported that he rarely spoke - thanks be to Allah for this - words except that he hoped Allah would confirm the words he uttered, i.e., he was secretly asking Allah to confirm the soundness of his advice to the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) with Qur’an. 'Umar (may Allah be pleased with him) was then informed that the Verse of Choice was revealed to confirm his speech with the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him). It is the verse where the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) gave his wives the choice either to remain as his wives or to be divorced and released, as Allah Almighty says: {But if you insist on conspiring against him, then indeed Allah is his Protector, as well as Gabriel and the righteous believers, and moreover, the angels are his supporters. Perhaps, if he were to divorce you all, his Lord would replace you with better wives.} [Surat at-Tahrīm: 4-5] It is said: There is no choice in these verses and mentioning it here is a delusion. In Al-Bukhāri's version, it was reported that ‘Umar ibn al-Khattāb (may Allah be pleased with him) reported: "The Prophet's wives backed each other against him out of jealousy, so, I said to them: Perhaps, if he were to divorce you all, his Lord would replace you with better wives; and so this verse was revealed." The sound opinion here is what was proven in the two Sahīh Collections and others, namely that the Verse of Choice is the verse where Allah Almighty says: {O Prophet, tell your wives, “If you seek the life of this world and its embellishments, then come, I will give you provision and release you graciously. But if you seek Allah and His Messenger and the Final Abode, then Allah has prepared for those who do good among you a great reward.”} [Surat al-Ahzāb: 28-29] It is said: There is a missing "and" probably in his saying: "The Verse of Choice", and the correct view is: "This verse and the Verse of Choice were revealed".
He reported that 'Ā’ishah and Hafsah (may Allah be pleased with both of them) used to cooperate against the rest of the Prophet's wives, forming a team together. The cause behind their excessive jealousy was divulging his secret, which made him upset and angry. ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him), then, asked the Messenger of Allah (may Allah be pleased with him) if he had divorced his wives, trying to find out the truth about what people were saying in the mosque. The Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) negated divorcing his wives, and 'Umar (may Allah be pleased with him) informed him of how the people felt sad for the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) because of what was circulated about him divorcing his wives. 'Umar (may Allah be pleased with him), then asked for the Prophet's permission to go down to the people, inform them of the correct news, and clarify the truth for them to rejoice. The Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) agreed and said to him: "If you wish," i.e. if you like and want to do so.
‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him) reported that he kept talking to the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) until there were no more signs of anger on his face and his teeth showed from laughing. "And he had the most charming front teeth of all people." "Thaghr" (front teeth): the mouth and front teeth. Then, the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) descended from the attic where he had been staying in seclusion, and ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him) descended while catching hold of the trunk and resting on it. The Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) went down "as if he was walking on the ground without touching it with his hand," i.e., he did not need to rest on the trunk when coming down due to his strength. ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him) said: "O Messenger of Allah, you remained in your room for twenty-nine," i.e., there is one day left to complete a month, as the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) swore not to have intercourse with his wives for a month. Thereupon, the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) said: "The month consists of twenty-nine," i.e., this month was twenty-nine days. ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him) stood at the door of the mosque and called out at the top of his voice: "The Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) did not divorce his wives", telling and informing the Prophet's Companions that the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) did not divorce his wives contrary to what they had been saying, and this verse was revealed: {Whenever they hear any news of security or fear, they spread it. If they referred it to the Messenger or those in authority among them, those with sound judgment could know it.} [Surat an-Nisā’: 83] When the people said that the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) had divorced his wives based on no information from anyone and without verifying or checking this out, Allah Almighty blamed them because if they had referred this to the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him), he would have informed them of the truth about it, or they could have referred it to someone who could ask and find out the truth about it from the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him). ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him) said: "And it was I who drew correct conclusions," i.e., verified this matter and checked it out.
"And Allah Almighty revealed the Verse of Choice," as previously mentioned. In the two Sahīh Collections, it was mentioned that ‘Ā’ishah (may Allah be pleased with her) said: He started with me as the first woman. The Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) said: "I will mention something, but you should only hasten if you consult your parents. She said: Indeed, I know my parents would not order me to leave you." Al-Bukhāri's version reads: "Then, he gave all of his wives the choice, and they said the same as what ‘Ā’ishah had said."
In some narrations in the two Sahīh Collections, the following was reported: The Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) kept himself secluded from his wives because of the honey he used to drink in the house of Zaynab bint Jahsh. 'Ā’ishah (may Allah be pleased with her) said: "I agreed with Hafsah that the one upon whom the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) would enter should say: I can detect the smell of Maghāfīr in you, did you eat Maghāfīr - Maghāfīr: sweet gum that has a foul odor. When he entered upon one of them, she said that to him, and he said: No, but I drank honey in the house of Zaynab bint Jahsh, and I will not drink it again. Thereupon, this verse was revealed: {O Prophet, why do you prohibit [yourself from] what Allah has made lawful to you} to: {You both had better turn to Allah in repentance.} [Surat at-Tahrīm: 1-4] to ‘Ā’ishah and Hafsah, {And [remember] when the Prophet told one of his wives something in secret} [Surat at-Tahrīm: 3], as he said: No, but I drank honey." It is said: The reason is that the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) had sexual intercourse with his bondmaid Māriyah in the house of Hafsah (may Allah be pleased with her) and Hafsah (may Allah be pleased with her) learned about it. So, the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) ordered her not to inform ‘Ā’ishah (may Allah be pleased with her). However, Hafsah (may Allah be pleased with her) revealed the Prophet's secret to ‘Ā’ishah (may Allah be pleased with her). It is also said: The reason is the things they did as a whole that enraged the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) and not a specific incident.
The Hadīth shows the Prophet's good morals and how he would honor whoever smiled at him by smiling back at him.
It also indicates the manifest merit of ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him).
It points out how a man should advise his daughter and fix her manners towards her husband.
It also signifies that putting a lot of pressure on women is something dispraised.
It encourages favoring the Hereafter by performing acts of obedience, avoiding sins, and refraining from being preoccupied with the pursuit of worldly pleasures..

1480

Abu Is-hāq reported: I was with Al-Aswad ibn Yazīd sitting in the grand mosque, and Ash-Sha‘bi was with us, and he narrated the Hadīth of Fātimah bint Qays: The Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) entitled her to no housing or financial maintenance. Then, Al-Aswad took a handful of pebbles and threw it at him and said: Woe to you! How could you narrate this?! ‘Umar said: We must not abandon the Book of Allah and the Sunnah of our Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) on account of a woman's statement. We do not know whether she memorized or forgot. She is entitled to housing and financial maintenance. Allah Almighty says: {Do not force them out of their houses, nor should they leave unless they commit a clear shameful act.} [Surat at-Talāq: 1].

Commentary : Allah has prescribed divorce after sparing no effort in reconciliation between the spouses. He has clarified its rulings and consequences, and He has made it three incidents of divorce so that each of the spouses would reconsider his stance; otherwise, they should be separated after the third incident of divorce, and the woman becomes unlawful for him after that until she is married to another man.
This Hadīth is related to a story mentioned in the two Sahīh Collections and others about the female Companion Fātimah bint Qays (may Allah be pleased with her) who was triply divorced by her husband. The Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) commanded her to move to the house of Ibn' Umm Maktūm - who was her cousin and was blind - and spend her 'Iddah (waiting period) there. He made her not entitled to financial maintenance for her particular case, as she used to offend her husband's family verbally or because she was in a desolate area and it was feared that someone might assault her; hence, he moved her to the house of Ibn' Umm Maktūm, as he was blind and would not see her. Fātimah bint Qays kept on narrating this Hadīth of hers after the Prophet's death; however, a group of the Companions disapproved of it. The Tābi‘i Abu Is-hāq as-Sabī‘i narrates that he was with Al-Aswad ibn Yazīd an-Nakha‘i - one of the Tābi‘is - in the great mosque, i.e., the grand mosque, which refers to the mosque of Kūfah, while Ash-Sha‘bi - ‘Āmir ibn Sharāhīl one of the Tābi‘is - was narrating the Hadīth of Fātimah bint Qays in this mosque, i.e., giving a legal fatwa based on this Hadīth. In this Hadīth, it is stated that the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) did not make Fātimah entitled to housing or financial maintenance after being triply divorced. So, Al-Aswad took a handful of pebbles and threw them at him and said: "Woe to you!", i.e., may Allah afflict you with ruin and destruction. It was a common saying among the Arabs that was not intended as a supplication. "How could you narrate this?!" All this was meant to express Al-Aswad's disapproval of Ash-Sha‘bi's narration of this Hadīth. Then, he informed him that ‘Umar ibn al-Khattāb (may Allah be pleased with him) said: "We must not abandon the Book of Allah and the Sunnah of our Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) on account of a woman's statement," i.e., we do not rely on issuing a Fatwa (legal opinion) like this on the Hadīth of Fātimah, given the importance of such a Fatwa, because she might have memorized it in the wrong way or she might have forgotten. Perhaps what ‘Umar meant by the Prophet's Sunnah was what his rulings indicated of adhering to the Book of Allah not a specific Sunnah in this regard. ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him), then, supported his saying that the triply divorced woman is entitled to housing and financial maintenance in her ‘Iddah by the verse in which Allah Almighty says: {O Prophet, when you [believers] divorce women, divorce them with consideration to their waiting period and keep a precise count of the waiting period, and fear Allah, your Lord. Do not force them out of their houses, nor should they leave unless they commit a clear shameful act.} [Surat at-Talāq: 1] In other words: O people, fear Allah your Lord and beware of disobeying Him by transgressing His limit; do not force your divorced wives out of their houses, where you made them live before divorce, until their ‘Iddah is over. "Shameful act" here refers to recalcitrance and bad morals. It is said: It means indecency towards her husband's family. It is also said that it means: Unless they commit adultery.
The Hadīth of Fātimah bint Qays was refuted by a group of the Companions, including ‘Umar, ‘Ā’ishah, and others who knew the Sunnah better than Fātimah bint Qays. Some considered the apparent meaning of the Hadīth and, thus, made the triply divorced woman entitled to spend her 'Iddah wherever she chooses without being obliged to spend the night at her ex-husband's house.
The Hadīth shows how a scholar should be corrected, even in his gatherings of knowledge, if he is mistaken.
It also highlights the Companions' keenness on adhering to the Qur’an and the authentic Sunnah..

1480

‘Ubaydullah ibn ‘Abdullah ibn ‘Utbah reported: Abu ‘Amr ibn Hafs ibn al-Mughīrah set out along with ‘Ali ibn Abi Tālib to Yemen. He sent to his wife, Fātimah bint Qays, one pronouncement of divorce that was still left from her divorce. He commanded Al-Hārith ibn Hishām and ‘Ayyāsh ibn Abi Rabī‘ah to give her alimony. They said to her: By Allah, there is no alimony for you unless you are pregnant. Thereupon, she went to the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) and informed him of what they had said. He said: There is no alimony for you. She, then, asked his permission to move, and he permitted her. She said: O Messenger of Allah, where? He said: To the house of Ibn ’Umm Maktūm, as he was blind and she could take off her clothes in his presence and he would not see her. When her ‘Iddah (waiting period) was over, the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) gave her in marriage to Usāmah ibn Zayd. Marwān sent Qabīsah ibn Dhu’ayb to ask her about the Hadīth, and she narrated it to him, whereupon Marwān said: We have not heard this Hadīth except from a woman. We shall adopt a safe path that we have found people upon. On hearing what Marwān said, Fātimah said: The Qur’an is between me and you. Allah Almighty says: {Do not force them out of their houses.} [Surat at-Talāq: 1] She said: This is regarding revocable divorce. What happens after the three? Why do you say there is no alimony for her if she is not pregnant? Then, on what grounds do you restrain her?.

Commentary : Allah has prescribed divorce and clarified its rulings and consequences after sparing no effort in reconciliation between the spouses. He has made it three incidents of divorce so that each of the spouses would reconsider their stance; otherwise, they should be separated after the third incident of divorce, and the woman becomes unlawful for him after that until she is married to another man.
In this Hadīth, the Tābi‘i ‘Ubaydullah ibn ‘Abdullah ibn ‘Utbah reports that the Companion Abu ‘Amr ibn Hafs ibn al-Mughīrah (may Allah be pleased with him) set out on a journey along with ‘Ali ibn Abi Tālib (may Allah be pleased with him) to Yemen when the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) sent him there. Abu ‘Amr (may Allah be pleased with him) sent to his wife Fātimah bint Qays a pronouncement of divorce while traveling. He had previously divorced her twice and had taken her back, and this was the third incident that made the divorce irrevocable. Abu ‘Amr (may Allah be pleased with him) commanded Al-Hārith ibn Hishām and ‘Ayyāsh ibn Abi Rabī‘ah (may Allah be pleased with both of them) to give her alimony. Another version narrated by Muslim reads: "He sent his deputy to her with barley, " but Fātimah declined it because she found it inadequate and did not accept it. They said to her: "By Allah, there is no alimony for you" because you are irrevocably divorced, and alimony is not for someone in your case "unless you are pregnant". In the version of An-Nasā’i: "So, she sent to Al-Hārith and 'Ayyāsh asking them for the alimony that was appointed for her by her husband, and they said: By Allah, no alimony is due on us for her unless she is pregnant, and she is not entitled to live in our house except with our permission." Thereupon, Fātimah went to the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) and informed him of what they had said, namely that she was not entitled to alimony unless she was pregnant. The Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) approved of what they had said and said to her: "There is no alimony for you." She then sought the Prophet's permission to move from her house, where she was divorced, as she was afraid for herself. The Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) permitted her to move to the house of her cousin Ibn' Umm Maktūm as he was blind and would not see her when taking off her clothes. His permission for her to go out is justified by the fact that he permitted her to move for an excuse, namely her indecency towards her husband's relatives or her fear that she might be assaulted, as mentioned in the narrations. However, if there is no need, then it is impermissible for her to go out or move, and it is forbidden to move her. Allah Almighty says: {Do not force them out of their houses, nor should they leave unless they commit a clear shameful act.} [Surat at-Talāq: 1] "Shameful act" here refers to recalcitrance and bad morals. It is said: It means indecency towards her husband's family. It is also said that it means: Unless they commit adultery.
When her 'Iddah was over, the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) gave her in marriage to Usāmah ibn Zayd (may Allah be pleased with him and his father) for knowing that he was religious, virtuous, had good morals and noble traits.
At that time, Marwān ibn al-Hakam was the ruler of Madīnah. He sent Qabīsah ibn Dhu’ayb to Fātimah (may Allah be pleased with her) to ask about this Hadīth, and she narrated it to him. The reason why Marwān asked her was mentioned in the version of An-Nasā’i: "'Abdullah ibn' Amr ibn' Uthmān, being a young man in the emirate of Marwān, divorced the daughter of Sa‘īd ibn Zayd and her mother was Bint Qays al-Battah. So, her maternal aunt, Fātimah bint Qays, sent to her commanding her to move from the house of 'Abdullah ibn' Amr. When Marwān heard about that, he sent to the daughter of Sa‘īd, commanding her to return to her house and asking her why she moved from her house before completing her 'Iddah." She informed him of the Hadīth of Fātimah, thereupon, Marwān was sent to Fātimah to verify this Hadīth. After hearing her Hadīth, Marwān said: "We have not heard this Hadīth except from a woman," by way of disapproval, and before Marwān, ‘Umar ibn al-Khattāb and ‘Ā’ishah (may Allah be pleased with both of them) expressed their disapproval of Fātimah's Hadīth. Marwān said: "We shall adopt a safe path that we found people upon," i.e., what is reliable, strong, and authentic and what people held fast upon and adhered to and acted upon. In other words, we shall adopt the opinion that a woman must not leave her house except after her ‘Iddah is over and that there is no alimony for her. On hearing what Marwān said and how he prevented the irrevocably divorced woman from leaving her house under all circumstances, Fātimah (may Allah be pleased with her) said: The Qur’an is between me and you, Allah Almighty says: {Do not force them out of their houses.} [Surat at-Talāq: 1] Taking this as supporting evidence, she said: This prohibition, which is understood from the first part of the verse, addresses the husband who can take back his wife, i.e., the housing is for the divorced woman whose divorce is revocable, which accords with what Allah Almighty says: {Then when they have approached the end of their waiting period, either retain them honorably or part with them honorably.} [Surat at-Talāq: 2] She said: So, what happens after the three incidents of divorce? How do you prevent her from going out, then, you say: There is no alimony for her unless she is pregnant? Then, on what grounds do you restrain her? She said this as an objection to Marwān, who made the irrevocably divorced woman entitled to housing and prevented her from going out without giving her financial maintenance. To sum up, her objection was: If you do not make the alimony obligatory, how could you prevent her from going out if the alimony is the recompense of being restrained?!.

1481

‘Ā’ishah reported: It is no good for Fātimah to mention this. He said: She was referring to her statement: No housing or financial maintenance..

Commentary : Allah has prescribed divorce for spouses who choose separation after exerting their utmost in reconciliation between them. He has made it three incidents of divorce so that each of the two spouses would reconsider their stance. Otherwise, they would be separated after the third incident of divorce, and she becomes unlawful for him after this until she gets married to another man. Islam has also regulated the rights and duties between spouses after divorce.
In this Hadīth, Muhammad ibn al-Qāsim narrates that when the Mother of the Believers ‘Ā’ishah (may Allah be pleased with her) was informed of what Fātimah bint Qays had said, namely that her husband had divorced her thrice and the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) did not make her entitled to housing or financial maintenance during her ‘Iddah (waiting period), she said disapprovingly: "It is no good for Fātimah" bint Qays "to mention" and narrate "this" Hadīth to people because it contradicts the explicit texts of the Book of Allah Almighty and the Sunnah of His Messenger (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him).
A group of the Companions, including ‘Umar, ‘Ā’ishah and others, rejected the Hadīth of Fātimah bint Qays because it contradicts, in their opinion, the verse in which Allah Almighty says: {O Prophet, when you [believers] divorce women, divorce them with concern to their waiting period and keep an accurate count of the waiting period, and fear Allah, your Lord. Do not force them out of their houses, nor should they leave unless they commit a clear shameful act. Such are the limits ordained by Allah.} [Surat at-Talāq: 1] It is said: The Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) commanded her to leave her house and spend her 'Iddah in the house of Ibn' Umm Maktūm and did not make her entitled to financial maintenance only because of her special case, as she used to verbally offend her husband's family, or because she was in a desolate place and it was feared that her husband or anyone else might assault her. 'Ā’ishah (may Allah be pleased with her) censured her narration..

1482

Fātimah bint Qays reported that she said: "O Messenger of Allah, my husband divorced me thrice, and I am afraid that my house will be broken into." So, he commanded her, and she moved (to another house)..

Commentary : Allah has prescribed divorce for spouses who choose separation after exerting their utmost in attempting reconciliation between them. He has made it three divorces; so that each of the two spouses would reconsider their stance. Otherwise, they would be separated after the third divorce, and she becomes unlawful for him after this until she gets married to another man. Islam has also regulated the rights and duties between spouses after divorce. Allah Almighty has commanded the divorced woman - whether the divorce is revocable or irrevocable - to spend the ‘Iddah (waiting period) in her house. Allah Almighty says: {O Prophet, when you [believers] divorce women, divorce them with concern to their waiting period and keep an accurate count of the waiting period, and fear Allah, your Lord. Do not force them out of their houses, nor should they leave unless they commit a clear shameful act. Such are the limits ordained by Allah.} [Surat at-Talāq: 1]
In this Hadīth, Fātimah bint Qays (may Allah be pleased with her) narrates that she came to the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) and said: "O Messenger of Allah, my husband divorced me thrice," so the divorce was irrevocable and final. "And I am afraid that my house will be broken into" during her stay in his house for her ‘Iddah. "Iqtihām" (breaking into): entering quickly. This means: She was afraid that someone would enter upon her and harm her because she was in a desolate place. Thereupon, the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) commanded her to leave that place and she went to the house of her paternal cousin, Ibn ’Umm Maktūm, because he was blind, and she could take off her clothes without him seeing her. Since she did not spend her ‘Iddah in her husband's house, the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) did not make her entitled to habitation or financial sustenance during her ‘Iddah..

1483

Jābir ibn ‘Abdullah reported: My maternal aunt was divorced, and she wanted to harvest her date palm trees. A man rebuked her for going out, so she went to the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) who said: "Yes, go out and harvest your date palm trees, for you may give (some of it) in charity or do a good deed.".

Commentary : The Islamic Shariah has brought facilitation and goodness to people. It takes into consideration their conditions when carrying out the Shariah rulings to prevent them from falling into difficulty or distress.
In this Hadīth, Jābir ibn ‘Abdullah (may Allah be pleased with him and his father) narrates that his maternal aunt - it was said: her name is Asmā’ - was irrevocably divorced, as mentioned in the version of Abu Dāwūd: "My maternal aunt was divorced thrice." She wanted to go out, during her ‘Iddah (waiting period), to collect the fruits from her date palm trees; however, a man rebuked her and forbade her from going out until her ‘Iddah was over. She went to the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) to ask him. She informed him of what had happened and of her condition and her need for harvesting her date palm trees and asked him if it was permissible for her to go out of her house during her ‘Iddah due to this necessity. The Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessing be upon him) replied saying: "Yes," and the version of Abu Dāwūd reads: "Go out," and collect your fruits, for perhaps after collecting the fruit of your date palm trees you may give part of it in charity to the poor and the needy "or do a good deed." "Ma‘rūf" (good deed): a comprehensive name including every known act of obeying Allah and doing good to people. This is an explanation of permitting the act of going out, even though it came in the form of notifying and urging her to do good. Moreover, he permitted her to go out due to her need to look after her interests, her date palm trees, and her properties as understood from the apparent indication of the beginning of the Hadīth.
Perhaps the difference between charity and a good deed is that the former refers to obligatory charity, while the latter refers to voluntary charity. The Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) said this to her only because he knew that she was a charitable person, who used to do good deeds frequently, or he answered her with what would guide her to charity and voluntary charity, and this denotes obvious kindness and wisdom.
The Hadīth implies guiding the questioner to what is good for him in his religion and worldly matters and adding to the response what the questioner needs.
It also indicates the permissibility of going out for the divorced woman during her ‘Iddah for a necessity and for fulfilling her interests that she cannot dispense with.
It denotes the permissibility of being keen on preserving wealth and acquiring it to do good and use it in consoling others.
It also indicates that charity in dates is to be given at the time of their harvest, and gifting others therefrom.
It also includes giving an indirect reference to the dates' owner to give charity and reminding him of good deeds and beneficence..

1493

Sa‘īd ibn Jubayr reported: I was asked about the two who swore the oath of condemnation during the governance of Mus‘ab; should they be separated? I did not know what to say, so I went to Ibn ‘Umar's house in Makkah. I said to the servant: Seek permission for me. He said: He is taking a nap; but he heard my voice and said: Is this Ibn Jubayr? I said: Yes. He said: Come in. By Allah, you have not come at this time except for a need. I entered and found him lying on a saddlecloth and resting his head on a fibre-filled pillow. I said: O Abu ‘Abdur-Rahmān, should the two involved in a case of Li‘ān (oath of condemnation) be separated? He said: Glory be to Allah! Yes. The first one who asked about this was so-and-so, the son of so-and-so. He said: O Messenger of Allah, what if any of us found his wife committing adultery? What should he do? If he were to say anything, his statement would be a horrible matter, and if he were to remain silent, his silence about the matter would also be terrible. He said: The Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) kept silent and did not answer him. Later on, he came to him and said: I have been afflicted with what I asked you about. Thereupon, Allah Almighty revealed these verses of Surat an-Nūr: {As for those who accuse their wives [of adultery]} [Surat an-Nūr: 6] So, he recited them to him, admonished and reminded him, and informed him that the worldly punishment is less severe than the punishment of the Hereafter. He said: No, by the One Who sent you with the truth I did not lie about her. Then, he called her, admonished and reminded her and informed her that the worldly punishment is less severe than the punishment of the Hereafter. She said: No, by the One Who sent you with the truth, he is a liar. So, he started with the man who testified four times by Allah that he was truthful and the fifth time that the curse of Allah would be upon him if he were a liar. Then, the woman came next, and she testified four times by Allah that he was a liar and the fifth time that Allah's wrath would be upon her if he were truthful. Then, he separated the two of them..

Commentary : The noble Shariah has clarified the rulings of marriage between the man and the woman and has explained the rulings of the husband's accusation of his wife for committing adultery without evidence and the consequent practice of Li‘ān, besides other rulings of separation, to protect lineages, repel shame from the spouses, and ward off the legally prescribed punishment of Qadhf (false accusation of adultery).
In this Hadīth, the great Tābi‘i Sa‘īd ibn Jubayr tells us that he was asked about the ruling of the two involved in Li‘ān - when a husband accuses his wife of adultery and denies the attribution of her child to himself and the woman negates this, they are required to practice Li‘ān (oath of condemnation) - should they be separated? He did not know what to say and was not aware of the ruling in this regard, and this was during the governance of Mus‘ab ibn az-Zubayr, who was the ruler of Iraq. Mus‘ab did not separate the spouses who practiced Li‘ān, as clarified in another version of Muslim.
Sa‘īd said: "So, I went to the house of Ibn ‘Umar in Makkah" showing that it was a different house than that in Madīnah. It seems that it was the house of Ibn ‘Umar where he stayed when going to Makkah for Hajj or ‘Umrah, and it seems also that Sa‘īd traveled from Kūfah to Makkah. On reaching the house of Ibn ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him and his father), he asked the boy, Ibn ‘Umar's servant, to seek permission for him to enter. The servant informed him that Ibn ‘Umar was taking a nap, it was noontime and midday. Ibn ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him and his father) heard the voice of Ibn Jubayr and recognized him and asked: Is this Ibn Jubayr who is asking for permission? Ibn Jubayr replied: Yes, I am Sa‘īd ibn Jubayr. So, he permitted him to enter and said: "By Allah, you have not come at this time except for a need." This signifies the understanding and modesty of Ibn ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him and his father) and how he did not make things difficult for whoever needed him during his rest, knowing that the one who would come to him during his rest had only come for a necessity; hence, he should not be upset with him; rather, he should receive him with a cheerful face. Ibn Jubayr entered upon Ibn ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him and his father) and found him lying on a "saddlecloth," a cloth laid on an animal's back under the saddle, and he was resting his head on a pillow, which is a cushion, and it was filled with fiber, i.e., tree or palm cortex.
Then, Sa‘īd ibn Jubayr said: "O Abu ‘Abdur-Rahmān," which is the nickname of ‘Abdullah ibn ‘Umar, and he asked him: Should the two involved in a case of Li‘ān be separated? Ibn ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him and his father) said: "Glory be to Allah! Yes." Ibn ‘Umar glorified Allah to express his surprise that Sa‘īd ibn Jubayr was unaware of this famous ruling. Ibn ‘Umar then said: "The first one who asked about this," i.e., the first one who asked the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) about what you asked me about "was so-and-so the son of so-and-so," who was ‘Uwaymir al-‘Ajlāni as mentioned in another version in Sahīh Muslim Collection: "The Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) separated between the two members of Banu al-‘Ajlān." He asked: O Messenger of Allah, tell me about the ruling of one who found his wife committing adultery; what should he do in such a situation? If he spoke about what he had seen, "his statement would be a horrible matter" that people would find disgusting. It would be Qadhf (false accusation of adultery) that entails flogging as a legally prescribed punishment in case he brought no evidence. "And if he were to remain silent" and did not speak about what he had seen, his silence about the matter would also be horrible and an unbearable feeling of anger. Ibn ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him and his father) reported that the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) remained silent and did not answer the man's question, waiting for the revelation and considering this a serious issue. The Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) would hate questions about things that did not occur. This man who asked the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) came back after some time and said: O Messenger of Allah, "I have been afflicted by" the matter I had asked you about, i.e., I have been afflicted and tested in this regard, as I saw my wife committing adultery. Thereupon, Allah Almighty revealed verses of Surat an-Nūr: {As for those who accuse their wives [of adultery] but have no witnesses except themselves, then the evidence of one of them is to testify four times by Allah that he is telling the truth, and the fifth [oath] is that may Allah curse him if he is telling a lie. But she will be spared the punishment if she testifies four times by Allah that he is telling a lie, and the fifth [oath] is that may Allah’s wrath be upon her if he is telling the truth.} [Surat an-Nūr: 6-9] This means: That Men who accuse their wives without having witnesses besides their own selves to testify to the truthfulness of their accusation, each of them should testify four times by Allah: that he is telling the truth about accusing his wife of adultery, then, in the fifth testimony, he should add the supplication against himself of being worthy of curse if he was lying about his accusation, which makes her subject to the legal prescribed punishment of adultery. What spares her this punishment is to testify four times by Allah that he is lying about accusing her, then, in her fifth testimony, she should add the supplication against herself of being liable to Allah's wrath if he was telling the truth about what he accuses her of.
The Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) recited these verses to the man and admonished him in the hope that he might take back his accusation "and reminded him" to repent, telling him that the worldly punishment - which is the legally prescribed punishment of Qadhf - is less severe and much easier than the punishment of the Hereafter. However, the man said: "No" I shall not take back what I said because it is true, and he swore, saying: By the One Who sent you with the truth, I did not lie about her by accusing her of adultery and immorality. Then, the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) called the woman and admonished her to repent in case she had sinned. He reminded and informed her that the worldly punishment - which is the prescribed punishment of adultery, i.e., being stoned - is less severe and much easier than the punishment of the Hereafter. However, the woman swore that her husband was lying in his claim against her. Thereupon, the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) commanded both of them to swear the oath of condemnation. The Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) started with the man since Allah Almighty started with him in the verse. The man swore four times by Allah that he was telling the truth about what he accused her of, and in the fifth testimony, he invoked the curse upon himself if he was a liar. Then, it was the woman's turn. So, she swore four times by Allah that her husband was lying about his claim against her by accusing her of adultery and immorality, and in the fifth, she supplicated against herself invoking Allah's wrath upon her if her husband was truthful in what he said. So, none of them admitted the truthfulness of the other. Hence, the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) separated between them. One of the rulings of Li‘ān is that if each of the spouses insists on what he said, then, they should not be united after Li‘ān and their marriage is invalidated.
The Hadīth clarifies the ruling of Li‘ān and its manner.
It points out how the sinner should be admonished and reminded of repentance..

1495

‘Abdullah reported: It was Friday night, and we were in the mosque when a man from the Ansār (supporters) came and said: If a man found another man with his wife and he speaks about it, you will flog him; or if he kills, you will kill him; and if he remains silent, he will remain silent in anger. By Allah, I will surely ask the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) about it. On the next day, he came to the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) and asked him saying: If a man found another man with his wife and he speaks about it, you will flog him; or if he kills, you will kill him; or if he remains silent, he will remain silent in anger. He said: O Allah, judge; and he kept supplicating, so the verse of Li‘ān (oath of condemnation) was revealed: {As for those who accuse their wives [of adultery] but have no witnesses except themselves} [Surat an-Nūr: 6], these verses. This man, of all people, was afflicted with this. So, he came with his wife to the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) and swore the oath of condemnation. The man testified four times by Allah that he was from the truthful, then, the fifth time he invoked a curse that Allah's curse be upon him if he was from the liars. She went to invoke a curse, but the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) said to her: Stop. However, she refused and invoked a curse. After they had both left, he said: Perhaps she will give birth to a curly-haired black child, and she gave birth to a curly-haired black child..

Commentary : The Shariah has clarified the rulings of marriage between the man and the woman and has explained the rulings of the husband's accusation of his wife for committing adultery without evidence and the consequent practice of Li‘ān, besides other rulings of separation, to protect lineages, repel shame from the spouses, and ward off the legally prescribed punishment of Qadhf (false accusation of adultery).
In this Hadīth, ‘Abdullah ibn Mas‘ūd (may Allah be pleased with him) narrates that they were in the Prophet's mosque on Friday night when a man from the Ansār - the people of Madīnah - came. It was Hilāl ibn ’Umayyah, and it is said: ‘Uwaymir al-‘Ajlāni. He said: "If a man found another man with his wife," i.e., he saw her committing adultery with him. If "he speaks" about it, "you will flog him" inflicting on him the legally prescribed punishment of Qadhf for having no witnesses, and if "he kills" the adulterer, "you will kill him" by way of legal retribution. "And if he remains silent" and does nothing, "he will remain silent in anger," i.e., anger and hatred for her. It seems that the man's speech was before the revelation of the verses of Li‘ān and it also seems that it was a mere question posed by that man at that time, not a real incident that had already occurred. The Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) used to hate such questions as mentioned in the Hadīth of Sahl ibn Sa‘d in the two Sahīh Collections.
Then, this man swore to ask the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) about this matter. On the next day - the next morning - the man went to the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) asking about what was previously mentioned. Thereupon, the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) supplicated: "O Allah, judge," i.e., clarify to us the ruling in this regard, and he continued supplicating Allah Almighty to clarify this incident, so, the verses of Li‘ān were revealed. These are the verses in which Allah Almighty says: {As for those who accuse their wives [of adultery] but have no witnesses except themselves, then the evidence of one of them is to testify four times by Allah that he is telling the truth, and the fifth [oath] is that may Allah curse him if he is telling a lie. But she will be spared the punishment if she testifies four times by Allah that he is telling a lie, and the fifth [oath] is that may Allah’s wrath be upon her if he is telling the truth.} [Surat an-Nūr: 6-9] This means: Men who accuse their wives without having witnesses besides their own selves to testify to the truthfulness of their accusation, each of them should swear four times by Allah that he is telling the truth about accusing his wife of adultery. Then, in the fifth testimony, he should add the supplication against himself of being worthy of condemnation if he is lying about his accusation, which makes her subject to the legally prescribed punishment of adultery. What spares her of this punishment is to testify four times by Allah that he is lying about accusing her. Then, in her fifth testimony, she should add the supplication against herself of being liable for Allah's wrath if he is telling the truth about what he accuses her of.
Among all people, this man was afflicted by the occurrence of what he asked about to his wife. So, he accompanied his wife to the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him). They both swore the oath of condemnation, i.e., the man testified four times by Allah that he was telling the truth, and then, the fifth time, he invoked the curse of Allah upon himself if he was lying. This is because testimony in an adultery case is not complete except with four witnesses, but this case was witnessed by none except the husband; hence, he was assigned four testimonies so that each oath would replace a witness, as an oath could sometimes replace a witness like when someone is entitled to some right but has one witness only. In this case, the Shariah considers his oath in place of the witness. After completing the four testimonies that replace the four witnesses, nothing is left after the testimony of the four witnesses in adultery against the married person, as in this case, except stoning, which is death. There is nothing left after taking the oath of condemnation four times except the curse of Allah Almighty or His wrath, which also indicates death (ruin). The woman, then, went to swear the oath of condemnation, but the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) said to her: "Stop," a word meant here to deter her, i.e., refrain and take your time. However, she refused to stop or be dissuaded from completing Li‘ān. Hence, she took her part in Li‘ān. When the two parties swore the oath of condemnation and went away after finishing their testimonies, the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) said: "Perhaps she will give birth to" the baby in her womb, and he will be "a curly-haired black child," i.e., not straight-haired, which was the description of the one she was accused of committing adultery with. It is as if the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) most likely believed that she was lying, and the child she gave birth to was just as the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) had described.
The Hadīth clarifies that the ruling of Li‘ān, in principle, is to take place between the man and his wife if he accuses her of adultery and has no witness but himself.
It also points out that things must be judged according to what is apparent, whereas Allah Almighty is the One Who judges the intentions.
It explains how Li‘an must take place in the presence of the Imam or the judge and in the presence of an assembly of people.
It shows the condition that makes Li‘ān obligatory, which is the woman's denial of committing adultery because if she admits it, Li‘ān becomes impermissible and she becomes subject to the legally prescribed punishment.
It also signifies that it is Sunnah for the ruler to admonish the two persons involved in Li‘ān when intending to swear the oath of condemnation, which becomes confirmed after the fifth time..

1496

Muhammad ibn Sīrīn reported: I asked Anas ibn Mālik, knowing that he had knowledge of that, and he said: Hilāl ibn ’Umayyah accused his wife of committing adultery with Sharīk ibn Sahmā’, the brother of Al-Barā’ ibn Mālik from his mother's side. He was the first man who practiced Li‘ān (oath of condemnation) in Islam. He swore oaths of Li‘ān against his wife, so the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) said: "Watch her, if she gives birth to a white-complexioned child having straight hair and sore eyes, he is the son of Hilāl ibn ’Umayyah, but if she gives birth to a child with dark eyelids, curly hair, and thin shanks, then he is the son of Sharīk ibn Sahmā’." He (the narrator) said: I was informed that she gave birth to a child with dark eyelids, curly hair, and thin shanks..

1498

Abu Hurayrah reported: Sa‘d ibn ‘Ubādah al-Ansāri said: O Messenger of Allah, what if a man finds his wife with another man? Should he kill him? The Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) said: No. Sa‘d said: Yes, by the One Who honored you with the truth. Thereupon, the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) said: Listen to what your master is saying!.

1502

Abu Hurayrah reported that the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) said about the slave whose ownership is shared between two men and one of them emancipates him, he said: He should guarantee..

Commentary : The Shariah has protected all rights including the partners' rights. It has forbidden any kind of offense practiced by one partner against the other. This Hadīth clarifies that when two people own a slave jointly and one of them emancipates his share of that slave, this entails emancipating the rest of the slave. When the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) said: "He should guarantee," it meant that the emancipator should guarantee his partner's share of the slave whom he emancipated, i.e., he is financially responsible for securing the complete freedom of that slave. In the Two Sahīh Collections: "But if he has no money, the slave will be required to work to pay for his freedom, but must not be overburdened." So, it made it clear that if the emancipator is poor and has no money to free the rest of the slave, he remains in slavery and is required to work for his freedom and to pay for the share of the partner who did not emancipate him. However, he should not be assigned tasks that are hard for him or beyond his ability..

Book of Hadith

| Hadiths

Narrated al-Miswar (ra): Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) slaughtered (the Hady) before he had his head shaved and then he ordered his Companions to do the same.
.

Narrated ‘Abdulllah ibn ‘Umar (ra): Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) said, "It is not sinful of a person in state of Ihraam to kill five kinds of animals."
.

Narrated ‘Aaishah (raa): Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) called the lizard afuwaysiq, but I did not hear him ordering it to be killed."
.

Narrated Ibn Buhaynah (ra): The Prophet (ﷺ), while in the state of Ihraam, was cupped at the middle of his head at Lahaa Jamal.
.

Narrated Ibn ‘Abbaas (ra): The Prophet (ﷺ) marriedMaymoonah (raa) while he was in the state of Ihraam.
.

Narrated by Ibn ‘Abbaas (ra): A man was crushed to death by his she-camel and was brought to Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) who said, "Give him a bath and shroud him, but do not cover his head, and do not bring any perfume near to him, as he will be resurrected reciting Talbiyah."
.

Narrated Ibn ‘Abbaas (ra): I heard the Prophet (ﷺ) delivering a sermon at `Arafaat saying, " Whoever cannot find a pair of sandals (i.e., na‘l), then let him wear khuffs, and whoever cannot find an Izaar, let him wear some trousers."
.

Narrated Al-Baraa (ra): The Prophet (ﷺ) assumedIhraam for ‘Umrah in the month of Thoo al-Qa'dah but the people of Makkah refused to admit him into Makkah till he agreed on the condition that he would not bring into Makkah any arms but sheathed.
.

‘Ā’ishah reported: It is no good for Fātimah to mention this. He said: She was referring to her statement: No housing or financial maintenance..

Fātimah bint Qays reported that she said: "O Messenger of Allah, my husband divorced me thrice, and I am afraid that my house will be broken into." So, he commanded her, and she moved (to another house)..

Abu Hurayrah reported that the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) said about the slave whose ownership is shared between two men and one of them emancipates him, he said: He should guarantee..

Book of Hadith

| Hadiths

Narrated al-Miswar (ra): Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) slaughtered (the Hady) before he had his head shaved and then he ordered his Companions to do the same. .

Narrated ‘Abdulllah ibn ‘Umar (ra): Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) said, "It is not sinful of a person in state of Ihraam to kill five kinds of animals." .

Narrated ‘Aaishah (raa): Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) called the lizard afuwaysiq, but I did not hear him ordering it to be killed." .

Narrated Ibn Buhaynah (ra): The Prophet (ﷺ), while in the state of Ihraam, was cupped at the middle of his head at Lahaa Jamal. .

Narrated Ibn ‘Abbaas (ra): The Prophet (ﷺ) marriedMaymoonah (raa) while he was in the state of Ihraam. .

Narrated by Ibn ‘Abbaas (ra): A man was crushed to death by his she-camel and was brought to Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) who said, "Give him a bath and shroud him, but do not cover his head, and do not bring any perfume near to him, as he will be resurrected reciting Talbiyah." .

Narrated Ibn ‘Abbaas (ra): I heard the Prophet (ﷺ) delivering a sermon at `Arafaat saying, " Whoever cannot find a pair of sandals (i.e., na‘l), then let him wear khuffs, and whoever cannot find an Izaar, let him wear some trousers." .

Narrated Al-Baraa (ra): The Prophet (ﷺ) assumedIhraam for ‘Umrah in the month of Thoo al-Qa'dah but the people of Makkah refused to admit him into Makkah till he agreed on the condition that he would not bring into Makkah any arms but sheathed. .

‘Ā’ishah reported: It is no good for Fātimah to mention this. He said: She was referring to her statement: No housing or financial maintenance..

Fātimah bint Qays reported that she said: "O Messenger of Allah, my husband divorced me thrice, and I am afraid that my house will be broken into." So, he commanded her, and she moved (to another house)..

Abu Hurayrah reported that the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) said about the slave whose ownership is shared between two men and one of them emancipates him, he said: He should guarantee..

Narrated al-Miswar (ra): Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) slaughtered (the Hady) before he had his head shaved and then he ordered his Companions to do the same.
.

Narrated ‘Abdulllah ibn ‘Umar (ra): Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) said, "It is not sinful of a person in state of Ihraam to kill five kinds of animals."
.

Narrated ‘Aaishah (raa): Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) called the lizard afuwaysiq, but I did not hear him ordering it to be killed."
.

Narrated Ibn Buhaynah (ra): The Prophet (ﷺ), while in the state of Ihraam, was cupped at the middle of his head at Lahaa Jamal.
.

Narrated Ibn ‘Abbaas (ra): The Prophet (ﷺ) marriedMaymoonah (raa) while he was in the state of Ihraam.
.

Narrated by Ibn ‘Abbaas (ra): A man was crushed to death by his she-camel and was brought to Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) who said, "Give him a bath and shroud him, but do not cover his head, and do not bring any perfume near to him, as he will be resurrected reciting Talbiyah."
.

Narrated Ibn ‘Abbaas (ra): I heard the Prophet (ﷺ) delivering a sermon at `Arafaat saying, " Whoever cannot find a pair of sandals (i.e., na‘l), then let him wear khuffs, and whoever cannot find an Izaar, let him wear some trousers."
.

Narrated Al-Baraa (ra): The Prophet (ﷺ) assumedIhraam for ‘Umrah in the month of Thoo al-Qa'dah but the people of Makkah refused to admit him into Makkah till he agreed on the condition that he would not bring into Makkah any arms but sheathed.
.