| 2 Hadiths


Hadith
3008
Jaabir ibn ‘Abdullaah(may Allah be pleased with him) narrated:
When it was the day (of the Battle) of Badr, prisoners of war were brought including Al-Abbaas who was undressed. The Prophetﷺ looked for a shirt for him. It was found that the shirt of ‘Abdullaah ibn Ubayy would do, so the Prophetﷺ let him wear it. That was the reason why the Prophetﷺ took off and gave his own shirt to ‘Abdullaah. The narrator adds, "He had done the Prophetﷺsome favor for which the Prophet ﷺ liked to reward him.”.

Commentary :
The Prophet ﷺ was considerate of people’s different conditions, rewarded their acts of kindness in kind, and did not repay evil in kind.
‘Abdullaah ibn Ubaiyy ibn Salool was the leader of hypocrites in Al-Madeenah who inwardly nursed enmity towards the Prophet ﷺ and Muslims (while proclaiming otherwise). However, this did not dishearten the Prophet ﷺ to reward him for some good things he did.
In this hadeeth, Jaabir ibn ‘Abdullah narrated that Al-‘Abbaas ibn ‘Abd Al-Muttalib(may Allah be pleased with them)was taken prisoner by the Muslims in the Battle of Badr, which took place between the Muslims and the disbelievers (of Quraysh) from Makkah in 2 A.H. and was brought to the Prophet ﷺ while being undressed. Heﷺ looked for a shirt for him and could not find any except that of ‘Abdullaah ibn Ubayy, so the Prophetﷺ let him wear it. As a reward, the Prophetﷺ took off and gave his own shirt to ‘Abdullaah’s son after his death to be shrouded in it. He ﷺ did so to reward his favor to Al-‘Abbaas(may Allah be pleased with him), and he ﷺ also led his funeral prayer, and came to his grave as requested by his son ‘Abdullaah ibn ‘Abdullaah ibn Ubayy(may Allah be pleased with him). It was also said that the Prophet ﷺ did so for the sake of his son, ‘Abdullaah ibn ‘Abdullaah ibn Ubayy(may Allah be pleased with him), out of the Prophet’s compassion for all Muslims and to console his son ‘Abdullaah, who was a righteous man, and also to win the hearts of the Khazraj tribe, for he was their chief.
It is deduced from the hadeeth that Muslims should treat their prisoners of war kindly and provide them with the needed clothes.
It is also inferred therefrom that it is permissible to reward favors to one’s relatives if they were done for his own sake and not at the request of such relatives.
It is also deduced that the reward of favors may be given to a person during his lifetime or after his death..

3010
AbooHurayrah(may Allah be pleased with him) narrated that the Prophetﷺ said, "Allah, Exalted is He, wonders at those people who will enter Paradise in chains!”
.

Commentary :
Allah, Exalted is He, conferred His grace, mercy, and generosity on His servants, and promised Paradise to those who embrace Islam, sincerely believe in and obey Him. It is odd that there should be people who reject Islam at first yet may be compelled (by circumstances) to embrace it, and afterwards become good and sincere Muslims, earn the pleasure of Allah, Exalted is He, and enter Paradise!
In this hadeeth, the Prophet ﷺ stated that Allah, Exalted is He, wonders at those people who will enter Paradise in chains! This means that such people would be taken prisoners by Muslims and chained. After being edified on Islam and learning that it is the true religion of Allah, Exalted is He, they would willingly embrace Islam, and thus would be admitted to Paradise. It was also said that they may be compelled (by circumstances) to embrace Islam and this would be the reason for their entering Paradise. Another possible meaning is that the hadeeth refers to the Muslims taken prisoner by the disbelievers who died in such a state or got killed by them and were resurrected in such a state. He ﷺ referred to their resurrection (in the very state in which they died) with the reference to entering Paradise because it is authentically reported that they shall enter it after their resurrection.
The hadeeth affirms the divine attribute of ‘wondering’ with respect to Allah, Exalted is He, in a manner that befits Him. We are enjoined to affirm such divine attributes exactly as the Prophet ﷺ affirmed them, without Tahreef (i.e., distortion), Takyeef (i.e., trying to describe "how" an Attribute is, e.g., to say: How is Allah's Face?), Tashbeeh and Tamtheel (i.e., likening Allah to His creation), or Ta‘teel (i.e., denial)..

3012
Al-Sa‘b ibn Jaththaamah(may Allah be pleased with him) narrated that the Prophetﷺpassed by me at a place called Al-Abwaa’ or Waddaan andwas asked whether it was permissible to attack the pagan warriors at night with the probability of exposing their women and children to danger. The Prophetﷺreplied, "They (i.e., women and children) are from them (i.e., pagans)." I also heard the Prophetﷺ saying, "The institution of Himaa (i.e., preserves and protected areas) is invalid except what belonged to Allah, Exalted is He, and His Messenger ﷺ.”
.

Commentary :
This hadeeth establishes various rules and principles, including that what is essential to performing a religious obligation may not be neglected or avoided. Muslims sometimes needed to attack their enemies at night, availing themselves of the element of surprise to achieve victory.These night attacksare deemed allowable, despite the fact thatthey may result in accidently killing non-combatants, such as women and children.These types of people generally may not be killed on the battlefield as per the Islamic law. The Prophet ﷺ gave permission for night attacks, as narrated by Al-Sa‘b ibn Jaththaamah(may Allah be pleased with him). The Prophetﷺpassed by him at a place called Al-Abwaa’ or Waddaan, places in Makkah; the first is 200 km from Makkah and 170 km from Al-Madeenah, and the distance between the two places is about 8 miles. He (may Allah be pleased with him) asked the Prophet ﷺ whether it was permissible to attack the pagan warriors at night with the probability of exposing their women and children to danger, for Muslims would not be able to identify women and children at night. The Prophetﷺreplied, "They (i.e., women and children) are from them (i.e., pagans)." It means that Muslims bear no sin for accidently killing or harming non-combatants if they were mixed with the combatants.In such cases there may be no other way to target the combatants without killing or harming the non-combatants. It goes without saying that the hadeeth does not mean that Muslims are allowed to target non-combatants (women and children) deliberately, because the Prophet ﷺ forbade killing women and children (on the battlefield). However, when the necessity warrants it, it is inevitable.
In the version of the hadeeth recorded by Ahmad, Al-Zuhree stated that the Prophet ﷺ forbade such an act afterward, referring to his prohibition during the Battle of Hunayn, meaning that he ﷺstrictly forbade killing women and children in war (at that battle) after it was deemed allowable (in the specified situation).
Al-Sa‘b ibn Jathaamah(may Allah be pleased with him) also said that he heard the Prophetﷺ saying, "The institution of Himaa (i.e., preserves and protected areas) is invalid except what belonged to Allah, Exalted is He, and His Messenger ﷺ.” The Himaa refers to the preserves and protected areas to which people and cattle are denied access to allow the grass therein to grow, and afterward they would be allocated by the ruler for grazing the animals given as part of the Zakaah funds, for instance. It is impermissible for anyone to declare such preserves and protected areas as Himaa except with the permission of Allah, Exalted is He, and His Messenger ﷺ, and his deputies who must act in accordance with the permission of Allah, Exalted is He, and His Messenger ﷺ, within the scope of need and for the benefit of Muslims.
The Prophet ﷺ allocated a Himaafor the horses kept for Jihaad purposes and for the camels given in Zakaah. ‘Umar ibn Al-Khattaab(may Allah be pleased with him)also allocated a Himaa for the camels given in Zakaah and horses used in Allah’s Cause. The Imaam or ruler may do what he believes to be in the interests of keeping the horses (used for Jihaad purposes) strong, provided that it would not make things hard for people and be at the expense of public pastures. This proves that the use of (public) lands is determined by the rulers only..

3014
‘Abdullaah(may Allah be pleased with him) narrated:
During some of the Ghazawaat (i.e., battles) of the Prophetﷺa woman was found killed. Allah's Messenger ﷺdisapproved the killing of women and children.
.

Commentary :
Allah, Exalted is He, did not legislate fighting against the disbelievers as a means of retaliation or oppression. Rather, Jihaadwas legislated to subdue the forces of polytheism and tyranny that prevent people from embracing Tawheed (i.e., Islamic monotheism), attaining deliverance from the punishment of Allah, Exalted is He, and earning His pleasure. This makes fighting a manifestation of mercy, not punishment, and for this reason the Prophet ﷺ forbade the killing of women and young boys, as shown in this hadeeth. ‘Abdullaah ibn ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him) narrated that during one of battles of the Prophetﷺ,a woman was found killed. Allah's Messenger ﷺdisapproved the deliberate killing of women and children, because they do not fight against Muslims, and the purpose of fighting is subduing the combatants to convey the message of Islam, the true religion of Allah, to all people.
It is noteworthy that if women and children are mixed with the disbelieving fighters and combatants and there is no way to get to them except by killing these women and children, Muslims bear no sin for that, because this would be accidental and not deliberate. It is also allowable for Muslim fighters to kill the combatant women and children who partake in fighting against them.
It is deduced from the hadeeth that Muslims should target and kill the combatant men in the disbelievers’ army.
It is inferred therefrom that Islam laid down the guidelines and rules governing matters of war, and considerately took into account the rights of the non-combatant women and children, and those who take the same ruling.
.

3017
‘Ikrimah narrated that ‘Alee (may Allah be pleased with them)burnt some people and this news reached Ibn ‘Abbaas(may Allah be pleased with them), who said, "Had I been in his place I would not have burnt them, as the Prophetﷺ said, 'Do not punish (anybody) with Allah's Punishment.' No doubt, I would have killed them, for the Prophetﷺsaid, 'If somebody (a Muslim) discards his religion (i.e., apostatize), kill him.’”.

Commentary :
Allah, Exalted is He, decreed that burning with fire as a punishment should be exclusive to Him.
In this hadeeth, ‘Ikrimah narrated that ‘Alee (may Allah be pleased with them) burnt some people, the Saba’eeyyah (i.e., the followers of ‘Abdullah ibn Saba’) whoapostatized and claimed that ‘Alee (may Allah be pleased with him) was their Lord! Verily, Allah, Exalted is He, is far Above their false claims. ‘Alee (may Allah be pleased with him) gathered them and burnt them by fire to emphasize the gravity and heinousness of such a crime, and severely punish them for such false claims and Shirk (i.e., associating patterners with Allah). This was a specific incident and the punishment was decided based on the Ijtihaad (i.e., scholarly reasoning) of ‘Alee (may Allah be pleased with him).Some Companions (may Allah be pleased with them) disapproved of it including Ibn ‘Abbaas(may Allah be pleased with them). When this news reached him, he said, "Had I been in his place, I would not have burnt them, as the Prophetﷺ said, 'Do not punish (anybody) with Allah's Punishment (i.e., burning with fire),'” which is exclusive to Allah, Exalted is He, and stated that he would have settled for killing them, for the Prophetﷺsaid, “If somebody (a Muslim) discards his religion (i.e., apostatizes), kill him.” This means that if a Muslim apostatizes and gives up Islam, he should be killed for apostasy, provided that the due conditions are met, and only the Imaam or ruler is entitled to execute this punishment.
It was also said that the prohibition of burning with fire as a punishment does not mean that it is impermissible but is rather meant as a manifestation of the enjoined humbleness. The permissibility is evidenced by the fact that the Prophet ﷺpierced the eyes of the shepherds from ‘Uraynah tribe with fire (branding their eyes with heated iron in retribution for doing the same to their victims), as authentically reported in Saheeh Al-Bukhaaree and Saheeh Muslim.
The hadeeth highlights the virtues of Ibn ‘Abbaas(may Allah be pleased with them) and his vast knowledge and understanding of the Prophet’s statements.
The hadeeth also underlines the becoming etiquette towards thoseholding dissenting opinions.
It is deduced from the hadeeth that burning with fire as a punishment is prohibited..

3019
AbooHurayrahh(may Allah be pleased with him) narrated:
I heard Allah's Messenger ﷺ saying, "An ant bit a Prophet of Allah once, and he ordered that the place of the ants be burnt. So, Allah, Exalted is He, inspired to him, 'It is because one ant bit you that you burnt a nation amongst the nations that glorify Allah?".

Commentary :
Islam preaches mercy to all Allah’s Creation: human beings, Jinn, animals, and birds. It enjoins Muslims to show mercy to all creatures and forbids them from vainly killing living beings for no real benefit. Moreover, it fosters people’s interests and protects them from loss and harm. This is why Allah, Exalted is He, admonished one of His Prophets for burning the place of the ants because one ant had bitten him. The Prophetﷺ said, "An ant bit a Prophet of Allah once, and he ordered that the place of the ants be burnt. So, Allah, Exalted is He, inspired to him, 'It is because one ant bit you that you burnt a nation amongst the nations that glorify Allah?’" This means that he ordered a whole nation that glorified Allah, Exalted is He, to be burnt because of one ant that had bitten him!
It should be noted that Allah, Exalted is He, admonished this Prophet for doing Khilaaf Al-Awlaa (i.e., an undesirable, yet permissible act that is not the best choice from a number of alternatives, contradicting that which is most appropriate and what is religiously superior under ordinary circumstances). This means that it would have been better for him to punish only the ant that had bitten him, and were he to do so, Allah, Exalted is He, would not have admonished him. However, He admonished him for exceeding the proper limits and burning the whole colony of ants!
It is deduced from the hadeeth that the punishment must be in proportion to the crime committed and must not be executed on anyone other than the perpetrator.
The hadeeth also highlights the gravity of burning living beings with fire..

3024
SaalimAboo Al-Nadr (the freed slave of ‘Umar ibn 'Ubaydullaah) said:
I was ‘Umar's clerk. Once ‘Abdullaah ibn AbeeAwfaa wrote a letter to ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with them) when he proceeded to Al-Harooriyah. I read in it that Allah's Messenger ﷺ in one of his military expeditions against the enemy, waited till the sun declined and then he got up amongst the people saying, "O people! Do not wish to meet the enemy, and ask Allah for safety, but when you face the enemy, be patient, and remember that Paradise is under the shades of swords." Then he ﷺ said, "O Allah, the Revealer of the Holy Book, the Mover of the clouds, and the Defeater of the clans (i.e., in the Battle of the Trench), defeat them, and grant us victory over them."
.

Commentary :
Wellbeing is one of the great blessings for which a person should constantly ask Allah, Exalted is He.
In this hadeeth, SaalimAboo Al-Nadr (the freed slave of ‘Umar ibn 'Ubaydullaah), who was ‘Umar's clerk, narrated that he once read a letter from ‘Abdullaah ibn AbeeAwfaa to ‘Umar ibn ‘Ubaydullah(may Allah be pleased with them) when he was proceeding to Al-Harooriyah. ‘Abdullaah ibn AbeeAwfaa(may Allah be pleased with him) was the commander of the army sent to fight against the Khawaarij (Kharijites), also known as Al-Harooriyah, during the reign of ‘Alee ibn AbooTaalib(may Allah be pleased with him). Al-Harooriyah was a name given to a deviant sect of the Kharijites attributed to Harooraa, a town near Kufa, where the Kharijites first gathered. The letter read that the Prophet ﷺ, in one of his military expeditions against the enemy, waited till the sun declined, avoiding the extreme heat of the sun, and then he got up amongst the Muslim fighters saying, "O people! Do not wish to meet the enemy,” and the prohibition in this regard is because one does not know what he would do, and whether or not he would survive, and because people’s abilities to patiently endure calamities vary, and also because wellbeing and safety are the ultimate attainments. He ﷺ also forbade Muslims from wishing to meet the enemy because it can involve arrogance, reliance on one’s personal abilities, and placing one’s trust in the effectiveness of the available means or material power (rather than relying on Allah, Exalted is He). Moreover, it implies underestimation of the enemy and belittling their power, which is contrary to the enjoined precaution and prudence. He ﷺ added, “and ask Allah for safety and wellbeing,” which is a general and all-inclusive term that incorporates protection from all harms and evils befalling a person’s body, property, family and loved ones in the worldly life and Hereafter. The Prophet ﷺ urged Muslims to ask Allah, Exalted is He, specifically for wellbeing on that occasion because a person is (more) vulnerable to injuries and adversities during wartime. He ﷺ added, “but when you face the enemy, be patient,” because it is incumbent on Muslims to adhere to patience and endurance during wartime as long as it is within their capacity, and those who keenly adhere to patience are rewarded with victory. The Prophet ﷺ also said: “and remember that Paradise is under the shades of swords."  This means that meeting the enemies of Islam and Muslims and fighting against them is one of the keymeans of entering Paradise. Afterward, he ﷺ implored Allah, Exalted is He, for victory. He ﷺ said, "O Allah, the Revealer of the Holy Book,” meaning the Quran, “the Mover of the clouds,” meaning the One who causes the rain to descend, the wind to blow, and the like, “and the Defeater of the clans (i.e., in the Battle of the Trench),” meaning the disbelievers from various clans who joined forces in the Battle of the Trench to eradicate Islam and the Muslims. Allah, Exalted is He, defeated them with a strong wind, and the Muslims did not even have to fight them off, “defeat them, and grant us victory over them.” In this statement, the Prophet ﷺreferred to what is mentioned the Quran, in the ayah that reads (what means): {Fight them; Allah will punish them by your hands and will disgrace them and give you victory over them and satisfy the breasts of a believing people.} [Quran 9:14]. He ﷺ also mentioned the moving of the clouds, in reference to Allah’s Power in causing the wind to blow and the clouds to move as He wills and causing rain whenever He wills. This indicates Allah’s Power in aiding the Muslim fighters by causing their movement, i.e., striving and fighting against the disbelievers, and putting the disbelievers’ movement to a halt and safeguarding Muslims from their harm; his mention of Allah’s Power in causing rain also indicates His bestowal of victory over their enemies, killing them, and taking spoils of war. All the while,withholding rain resemblesthe Muslims’ defeat and failure to kill their enemies or obtain spoils of war. He ﷺ also made mention of defeating the ‘clans,’imploring Allah, Exalted is He, to bestow His grace in that battle as He did in the Battle of the Trench, and reminding Muslims to rely solely on Allah, Exalted is He, and to believe that nothing comes to pass except by His will.
The hadeeth forbids Muslims from wishing for meeting the enemy and going to war, and this is different from aspiring to martyrdom.
It is deduced from the hadeeth that when Muslims meet their enemies, it is incumbent on them to adhere to patience.
It is also inferred therefrom that it is allowable to supplicate Allah, Exalted is He, to defeat and destroy the disbelievers.
.

3029
Narrated AbooHurayrah (may Allah be pleased with him):
Allah's Messenger ﷺ said: "War is deceit"..

Commentary :
A person may be allowed to do at a time of war what isn’t generally allowed in other situations, including: resorting to deceit, meaning Tawriyyah (i.e., indirect speech; when a speaker says something that has an apparent meaning that the listener would understand, and another hidden meaning, and the speaker’s intention is this hidden meaning, except that he concealed it with that apparent and immediate meaning that first comes to the listener’s mind) and lying, if needed, because war is deceit, as the Prophet ﷺ described it,as narrated by AbooHurayrah(may Allah be pleased with him).
It was also said that it is allowable to resort to deceit at times of war whenever possible, to realize significant benefits for Muslims. When Muslims exhaust all means of deceit at times of war, they should then opt for fighting. It was also said that when one is deceived once at time of war, it incurs his destruction for good, and there is no way back from it.
It is deduced from the hadeeth that it is allowable for a Muslim to tell a lie and speak contrary to the truth to display strength and motivate his fellows with the aim of demoralizing the enemy or lie to their enemies to deceive them. It was narrated on the authority of Asmaa’ bintYazeed(may Allah be pleased with her)that the Prophet ﷺ said: “It is not lawful to lie except in three cases: a man tells his wife something (untrue) to please her, to lie during war, and to lie in order to bring peace between disputing people.”.

3035
Jareer(may Allah be pleased with him) narrated:
Allah's Messenger ﷺdid not screen himself from me since my embracing Islam, and whenever he ﷺ saw me, he would receive me with a smile. Once I told him that I could not sit firm on horses. He ﷺ stroke me on the chest with his hand and said, "O Allah! Make him firm and make him a guiding and a rightly guided man."
.

Commentary :
The hadeeth highlights the merits of Jareer ibn ‘Abdullaah(may Allah be pleased with him). He (may Allah be pleased with him)narrated that the Prophet ﷺdid not screen himself from him since he embraced Islam, meaning that he ﷺ did not deny him access to his house or gatherings, even though he (may Allah be pleased with him) was a young man. Whenever he (may Allah be pleased with him) requested permission to enter his house, he ﷺ granted him permission and he ﷺ always met him with a smile, and this reflects the Prophet’s kindness towards his Companions (may Allah be pleased with them). Jareer(may Allah be pleased with him)was held in high regard by his people, and therefore the Prophet ﷺ respected that, and held him in high regard as well. Jareer(may Allah be pleased with him) once complained to the Prophet ﷺ that he would fall down from his horse or feared to fall down from it when it ran. He (may Allah be pleased with him) said: “Once I told him that I could not sit firmly on horses. He ﷺ stroked me on the chest with his hand and said, "O Allah! Make him firm and make him a guiding and a rightly guided man.” Henceforth, Jareer(may Allah be pleased with him) did not fall down from his horse. Another version recorded by Al-Bukhaaree reads, “… and make him guided and a source of guidance (to others).”
It is deduced from the hadeeth that the Companions (may Allah be pleased with them) always hastened to inform the Prophet ﷺ of all their affairs, seeking his advice and supplication.
It is also inferred therefrom that meeting people with a smile is part of the Prophets’ considerate attitude towards people; it indicates humbleness and fosters mutual affection.
The hadeeth highlights the virtues of chivalry and horse riding, being essential skills for every noble man and chief.
It is inferred from the hadeeth that there is no harm for a scholar or Imaam (i.e., ruler) to touch the person to whom he is referring whether he is the addressee or otherwise.
The hadeeth underlines amethod to win people’s hearts..

3039
Al-Baraa’ ibn ‘Aazib(may Allah be pleased with him) narrated:
The Prophetﷺ appointed ‘Abdullaah ibn Jubayr as the commander of the infantry men (archers), who were fifty on the day (of the battle) of Uhud. He ﷺ instructed them, "Stick to your place, and do not leave it even if you see birds snatching us, till I send for you; and if you see that we have defeated the disbelievers and made them flee, even then you should not leave your place till I send for you." Then the disbelievers were defeated. By Allah, I saw the women fleeing lifting up their clothes revealing their leg-bangles and their legs. So, the Companions of ‘Abdullaah ibn Jubayr said, "The spoils of war! O people, the spoils of war! Your companions have become victorious, what are you waiting for now?" ‘Abdullaah ibn Jubayr(may Allah be pleased with him) said, "Have you forgotten what Allah's Messenger ﷺ said to you?" They replied, "By Allah! We will go to the people (i.e., the enemy) and collect our share from the spoils of war." But when they went to them, they were forced to turn back defeated. At that time Allah's Messenger ﷺin their rear was calling them back. Only twelve men remained with the Prophetﷺ and the disbelievers martyred seventy men from us. On the day (of the battle) of Badr, the Prophetﷺ and his Companions (may Allah be pleased with them) had caused the Pagans to lose 140 men, seventy of whom were captured and seventy were killed. Then AbooSufyaan asked thrice, "Is Muhammad present amongst these people?" The Prophetﷺ ordered his Companions (may Allah be pleased with them) not to answer him. Then he asked thrice, "Is the son of AbooQuhaafah present amongst these people?" He asked again thrice, "Is the son of Al-Khattaab present amongst these people?" He then returned to his companions and said, "As for these (men), they have been killed." ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him) could not control himself and said (to AbooSufyaan), "You told a lie, by Allah! O enemy of Allah! All those you have mentioned are alive and sound, and the thing which will make you unhappy is still there." AbooSufyaan said, "Our victory today is a counterbalance to yours in the Battle of Badr, and in war (the victory) is always undecided and is shared in turns by the belligerents, and you will find some of your (killed) men mutilated, but I did not urge my men to do so, yet I do not feel sorry for their deed" After that he started reciting cheerfully, "O Hubal, be high! On that the Prophetﷺ said (to his companions), "Why do not you answer him back?" They said, "O Allah's Messenger ﷺ What shall we say?" He ﷺ said, "Say, Allah is Higher and more Sublime." (Then) AbooSufyaan said, "We have the (idol) Al-‘Uzzaa, and you have no ‘Uzzaa." The Prophet ﷺ said (to his Companions), "Why do not you answer him back?" They asked, "O Allah's Messenger ﷺ!What shall we say?" He ﷺ said, "Says Allah, Exalted is He, is our Helper and you have no helper.”
.

Commentary :
Uhud is one of the mountains of Al-Madeenah, four kilometers from the Prophet’s Mosque, where the Battle of Uhud took place in Shawwal 3 A.H. between the Muslims and Quraysh.
In this hadeeth, Al-Baraa’ ibn ‘Aazib(may Allah be pleased with him) narrated that the Prophet ﷺ appointed ‘Abdullaah ibn Jubayr(may Allah be pleased with him) as the commander of the archers, who were fifty, at the Battle of Uhud. He ﷺ instructed them, "Stick to your place, and do not leave it even if you see birds snatching us,” meaning that even if we got killed and birds started eating our flesh, do not leave your posts, “till I send for you; and if you see that we have defeated the disbelievers and made them flee, even then you should not leave your place till I send for you." This was a stern warning against disobeying the Prophet’s command, to emphasize the gravity of the situation, and the importance of guarding Muslims from the top of the mountain lest the disbelievers should seize the opportunity and defeat them.
The battle started and the disbelievers were defeated. Al-Baraa’ (may Allah be pleased with him) even said: “By Allah, I saw the women,” meaning with the disbelievers, “fleeing,” in a hurry so much that they were, “lifting up their clothes revealing their leg-bangles and their legs.”
On seeing that, the companions of ‘Abdullaah ibn Jubayr(may Allah be pleased with him), the very men whom the Prophet ﷺ sternly warned against leaving their places, said, "The spoils of war! O people, the spoils of war! Your companions have become victorious, what are you waiting for now?" They noticed that the defeated soldiers were trying to take their properties and flee (and therefore hastened to take the spoils of war). ‘Abdullaah ibn Jubayr(may Allah be pleased with him) reminded them of the Prophet’s command and warning against leaving their place, but they still insisted on leaving and taking the spoils of war. When they reached the spoils of war, they were confused and did know where to go, as a punishment for their disobedience to the Prophet’s command andwere forced to turn back defeated. At that time Allah's Messenger ﷺ wasin their rear, calling them back. Only twelve men remained with the Prophetﷺ, and it was also said fourteen, including: Aboo Bakr, ‘Umar, ‘Alee, ‘Abd Al-Rahmaan ibn ‘Awf, Sa‘d ibn AbeeWaqqaas, Talhah ibn ‘Ubaydullaah, Al-Zubayr ibn Al-‘Awwaam, Aboo ‘Ubaydah ibn Al-Jaraah(may Allah be pleased with them), from the emigrants; Al-Hubaab ibn Al-Munthir, AbooDujaanah, ‘Aasim ibn Thaabit ibn Abee Al-Aflah, Al-Haarith ibn Al-Summah, Usayd ibn Hudayr, and Sa‘d ibn Mu‘aadh(may Allah be pleased with them), from the Ansaar, and Sahl ibn Hunayf(may Allah be pleased with him) was also said to be among them.
The disbelievers killed seventy Muslim men including Hamzah ibn ‘Abd Al-Muttallib(may Allah be pleased with him), the Prophet’s uncle, and he was killed at the hands of Wahshee, the slave of Jubayr ibn Mut‘im. On the day (of the battle) of Badr, the Prophetﷺ and his Companions (may Allah be pleased with them) had caused the pagans to lose 140 of their men, seventy of whom were captured, and seventy of whom were killed.
After the battle ended, AbooSufyaan, who was a disbeliever then, asked thrice, "Is Muhammad present amongst these people?" The Prophetﷺ ordered his Companions (may Allah be pleased with them) not to answer him. Then he asked thrice, "Is the son of AbooQuhaafah present amongst these people?" He asked again thrice, "Is the son of Al-Khattaab present amongst these people?" He then returned to his companions and said, "As for these (men), they have been killed." ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him) could not control himself and said (to AbooSufyaan), "You have lied, by Allah! O enemy of Allah! All those you have mentioned are alive and sound, and the thing which will make you unhappy is still there." ‘Umar’s response despite the Prophet’s command was motivated by his zeal for the Prophet ﷺ lest the disbelievers believe that he ﷺ was killed and his Companions (may Allah be pleased with them) were weak, yet it did not actually imply disobedience; his act was rather rewardable, since the Prophet ﷺ commanded the Companions (may Allah be pleased with them) afterward to answer AbooSufyaan. The Prophet’s second command constituted a tacit approval of ‘Umar’s response, because it served the best interests of Muslims. Thereupon, AbooSufyaan said, "Our victory today is a counterbalance to yours in the Battle of Badr, and in war (the victory) is always undecided and is shared in turns by the belligerents, and you will find some of your (killed) men mutilated,” by the breaking of their noses, the splitting open of their stomachs, and the like, all of which is prohibited in Islam as delineated in the Islamic etiquette of war. AbooSufyaan stated that he did not disapprove of his soldiers’ acts and the mutilation of Muslims’ dead bodies, being their enemies. Afterward, he started reciting some rhymingRajaz verses (i.e., poetic verses composed in a meter used in classical Arabic poetry called Rajaz) cheerfully, "O Hubal, be high!” Hubal was the name of the idol placed inside the Ka‘bah and was worshipped by the pagans of Makkah. On that the Prophetﷺ commanded his Companions (may Allah be pleased with them) to answer back and say, "Say, Allah is Higher and more Sublime." The Prophet ﷺ commanded them to respond to AbooSufyaan because he ﷺwas commissioned to raise the word of Allah (i.e., His religion) high and proclaim it. When AbooSufyaan said what he said, he ﷺ could not remain silent and had to raise the word of Allah high and proclaim it. In the response, the Prophet ﷺ emphasized that Muslims believe that Allah, Exalted is He, is Greater and Higher than all these idols worshipped by the pagans.
(Then) AbooSufyaan said, "We have the (idol) Al-‘Uzzaa, and you have no ‘Uzzaa." Al-‘Uzzaa was the name of one of their idols, and it was also said that it was the name of a tree worshipped by the people of Ghatafaan. The Arabic word ‘Uzzaa denotes glory and pride, suggesting that the pagans had a god that was their source of glory and pride, unlike Muslims. Thereupon, the Prophet ﷺ commanded Muslims to respond by saying, Says Allah, Exalted is He, is our Helper and you have no helper.” Meaning that Allah, Exalted is He, is the ultimate source of help and He bestows upon the believers victory and support, and deserts the disbelievers whose idols cannot avail them anything nor grant them support. AbooSufyaan could not say anything more and remained silent. The Prophet ﷺ did not answer back to him personally,and his refined status was vastly superior to AbooSufyaan’s; instead,he commanded the Companions (may Allah be pleased with them) to answer to him.
The hadeeth highlights the gravity of disobeying the Prophet’s commands, for it incurs loss and defeat.
It also underlines that when Muslims disobey Allah, Exalted is He, and His Messenger ﷺ, they would be the same as the non-Muslims and in the event of a confrontation between the two parties, the ones who avail themselves of the worldly material means (numerical superiority, arms, and strength) win (i.e., Muslims will be deprived of the support of Allah, Exalted is He).
It is inferred from the hadeeth that Muslims are required to avail themselves of the worldly material means leading to victory,and also duly rely on Allah, Exalted is He.
It is deduced therefrom that soldiers are enjoined to obey their commander, for disobeying his commands is one of the key reasons for defeat and loss.
The hadeeth highlights the virtues of Aboo Bakr and ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with them), and their special status in the Prophet’s heart.
.

3040
Anas (may Allah be pleased with him) narrated:
Allah's Messenger ﷺ was the (most handsome), most generous and the bravest of all people. Once the people of Al-Madeenah got frightened, having heard an uproar at night. So, the Prophetﷺ met the people while he was riding an unsaddled horse belonging to AbooTalhah(may Allah be pleased with him) and carrying his sword (slung over his shoulder). He ﷺ said (to them), "Do not get scared, do not get scared." Then he ﷺ added, "I found it (i.e., a horse that was) very fast.”.

Commentary :
Courage is a praiseworthy quality and the Prophet ﷺwas characterized by outstanding courage, reflected in many incidents throughout his lifetime.
In this hadeeth, Anas ibn Maalik (may Allah be pleased with him) narrated that the Prophet ﷺ was the most handsome person and had the best moral character; he ﷺ was the most generous and the bravest of all people; he ﷺ never fled from the battlefield, and steadfastly faced his enemies. Anas (may Allah be pleased with him) listed only these three qualities, because they are consideredfrom the key human virtues. Anas (may Allah be pleased with him) related an incident that reflected the Prophet’s remarkable courage. Once the people of Al-Madeenah got frightened, having heard an uproar at night. Frightened, they headed towards the source of the sound, and the Prophetﷺ met the people while he was riding an unsaddled horse belonging to AbooTalhah(may Allah be pleased with him) and carrying his sword (slung over his shoulder). He ﷺ had gone and investigated the matter and was on his way back when he ﷺ met them. He ﷺ said to them, to calm them down, "Do not get scared, do not get scared." Then he ﷺ added, "I found it (i.e., a horse that was) very fast.”
It was said that the horse in reference was awfully slow, but when the Prophet ﷺ rode it, it became very fast, by the blessing of the Prophet ﷺ. In the hadeeth, the Prophet ﷺ likened the fast horse to the sea; the Arabic word used in the hadeeth is Bahr, meaning sea, to indicate its speed and the rider’s comfort as smooth as a boat ride.
The hadeeth underlines the noble qualities with which Allah, Exalted is He, endowed His Messenger ﷺ.
It is deduced from the hadeeth that it is allowable for a Muslim to go alone to (investigate dangerous situations and) spy on the enemy as long as it is not certain that it would incur his destruction.
It is deduced that it is allowable to ride a horse without a saddle.
It is also inferred therefrom that it is permissible to borrow a horse to ride it to partake in Jihaad.
The hadeeth urges Muslims to bear glad tidings to people after the reasons of their fear are eliminated. .

3045
AbooHurayrah(may Allah be pleased with him) reported:
Allah's Messenger ﷺ sent ten men on a military expedition to spy on the enemies under the leadership of ‘Aasim ibn Thaabit Al-Ansaaree, the grandfather of ‘Aasim ibn ‘Umar Al-Khattaab(may Allah be pleased with them). They proceeded till they reached Had’ah, a place between ‘Usfaan, and Makkah, and their news reached a branch of the tribe of Hudhayl called BaneeLihyaan. About two-hundred men, who were all archers, hurried to follow their tracks till they found the place where they had eaten dates that they had brought with them from Al-Madeenah. They said, "These are the dates of Yathrib (i.e., Al-Madeenah), "and continued following their tracks. When ‘Aasim and his companions (may Allah be pleased with them) saw their pursuers, they went up a high place and the disbelievers circled them. The disbelievers said to them, "Come down and surrender, and we promise and guarantee you that we will not kill any one of you." ‘Aasim ibn Thaabit(may Allah be pleased with him), the leader of the military expedition, said, "By Allah! I will not come down to be under the protection of disbelievers. O Allah! Convey our news to Your Prophet ﷺ. Then the disbelievers threw arrows at them till they were martyred ‘Aasim along with six other men, and three men came down accepting their promise and convention, and they were Khubayb Al-Ansaaree and Ibn Dathinah and another man. So, when the disbelievers captured them, they undid the strings of their bows and tied them. Then, the third (of the captives) said, "This is the first betrayal. By Allah! I will not go with you. No doubt these, namely the martyred, have set a good example to us." So, they dragged him and tried to compel him to accompany them, but as he refused, they killed him. They took Khubayb and Ibn Dathinah with them and sold them (as slaves) in Makkah (and all that took place) after the battle of Badr. Khubaybwas bought by the sons of Al-Haarith ibn ‘Aamir ibn Nawfal ibn ‘Abd Manaaf. It was Khubayb who had killed Al-Haarith ibn ‘Aamir on the day (of the battle of) Badr. So, Khubayb remained a prisoner with those people. Al-Zuhree narrated: ‘Ubaydullaah ibn ‘Iyyaad said that the daughter of Al-Haarith had told him, "When those people gathered (to kill Khubayb) he borrowed a razor from me to shave his pubes and I gave it to him. Then he took a son of mine while I was unaware when he came upon him. I saw him placing my son on his thigh and the razor was in his hand. I got scared so much that Khubayb noticed the agitation on my face and said, 'Are you afraid that I will kill him? No, I will never do so.' By Allah, I never saw a prisoner better than Khubayb. By Allah, one day I saw him eating of a bunch of grapes in his hand while he was chained in irons, and there was no fruit at that time in Makkah." The daughter of Al-Haarith used to say, "It was a boon Allah, Exalted is He, bestowed upon Khubayb." When they took him out of the Sanctuary (of Makkah) to kill him outside its boundaries, Khubayb requested them to let him offer a two Rak‘ah prayer. They allowed him and he offered two Rak‘ahs and then said, "Had not I been afraid that you would think that I was afraid (of being killed), I would have prolonged the prayer. O Allah, kill them all with no exception." (He (may Allah be pleased with him) then recited the poetic verse, "I am being martyred as a Muslim; I do not mind how I am killed in Allah's Cause, for my killing is for Allah's Sake; and if Allah wishes, He will bless the amputated parts of a torn body." Then the son of Al-Haarith killed him. So, it was Khubayb(may Allah be pleased with him) who set the tradition for any Muslim sentenced to death in captivity, to offer a two Rak‘ah prayer (before being killed). Allah fulfilled the invocation of ‘Aasim ibn Thaabit on that very day on which he was martyred. The Prophetﷺinformed his Companions (may Allah be pleased with them) of their news and what had happened to them. Later on, when some disbelievers from Quraysh were informed that ‘Aasim had been killed, they sent some people to fetch a part of his body (i.e., his head) by which he would be recognized. (That was because) ‘Aasim had killed one of their chiefs on the day (of the battle) of Badr. So, a swarm of wasps, resembling a shady cloud, were sent to hover over ‘Aasim and protect him from their messenger and thus they could not cut off anything from his flesh.

حَدَّثَنَا أَبُو الْيَمَانِ، أَخْبَرَنَا شُعَيْبٌ، عَنِ الزُّهْرِيِّ، قَالَ أَخْبَرَنِي عَمْرُو بْنُ أَبِي.

Commentary :
The battle of Al-Rajee‘ took place in Safar 4 A.H., and it was named after a well located between Makkah and ‘Usfaan, closer to the latter. It was a village about 80 miles (128 km) from northern Makkah on the way to Al-Madeenah.
In this hadeeth, AbooHurayrah(may Allah be pleased with him) reported that the Prophet ﷺ dispatched ten men on a military expedition. The Arabic word used in the hadeeth is Raht, which denotes a number of men below ten, and it has also been said that it was below forty. A military expedition consisted of maximum 400 men (soldiers). Their task, under the leadership of ‘Aasim ibn Thaabit Al-Ansaaree, the grandfather of ‘Aasim ibn ‘Umar Al-Khattaab on his mother’s side (may Allah be pleased with them), was to spy on the Muslims’ enemies. They proceeded till they reached Had’ah, a place between ‘Usfaan and Makkah, 7 miles away from ‘Usfaan, and their news reached a branch of the tribe of Hudhayl called BaneeLihyaan, meaning that the people of this branch knew of the military expedition. Therefore, about two-hundred men (from BaneeLihyaan), who were all archers, hurried to follow their tracks till they found the place where they had eaten dates that they had brought with them from Al-Madeenah. They said, "These are the dates of Yathrib (i.e., the old name of Al-Madeenah),” and continued following their tracks. When ‘Aasim and his companions (may Allah be pleased with them) saw their pursuers, they went up to a high place and the disbelievers circled them. During the siege, the disbelievers promised them security and guaranteed that they would not kill any one of them if they surrendered. ‘Aasim ibn Thaabit(may Allah be pleased with him), the leader of the military expedition, said, "By Allah! I will not come down to be under the protection of disbelievers,” because he (may Allah be pleased with him) knew that he could not trust them. He (may Allah be pleased with him) invoked Allah, Exalted is He, saying: “O Allah! Convey our news to Your Prophet ﷺ.” Since ‘Aasim and his companions (may Allah be pleased with them) defiantly refused to surrender, the disbelievers shot arrows at them till they were martyred. ‘Aasimand six other men (may Allah be pleased with them) were killed, and three men came down, accepting the promise of security, and they were Khubayb ibn ‘Adiyy Al-Ansaaree, Zayd ibn Al-Dathinah Al-Ansaaree and another man (may Allah be pleased with them); it was said that his name was ‘Abdullaah ibn Taariq. When the disbelievers captured them, they undid the strings of their bows and tied them. Then, the third man (of the captives, i.e., ‘Abdullaah ibn Taariq) said, "This is the first betrayal. By Allah! I will not go with you. No doubt these, namely the martyrs, have set a good example to us." So, they dragged him and tried to compel him to accompany them, but as he refused, they killed him. They took Khubayb and Ibn Dathinah with them and sold them (as slaves) in Makkah. All this took place after the battle of Badr, explaining why the disbelievers sought revenge. Khubayb was bought by one of the sons of Al-Haarith ibn ‘Aamir ibn Nawfal ibn ‘Abd Manaaf, named ‘Uqbah, AbooSirwa‘ah and his half-brother Hujayr ibn Abee ‘Ihaab (on his mother’s side). It was Khubayb who had killed Al-Haarith ibn ‘Aamir on the day of Badr. So, Khubayb remained a prisoner with the sons of Al-Haarith, and Sawfaan ibn Umayyah bought Ibn Al-Dathinah and killed him in Makkah.
‘Ubaydullaah ibn ‘Iyyaad, one of the hadeeth’s narrators, said that Zaynab bint Al-Haarith told him of what happened to Khubayb. She said that when Banee Al-Haarith gathered (to kill Khubayb), he borrowed a razor from her to shave, and she gave it to him. Her son came near Khubayb(may Allah be pleased with him) while she was unaware. She saw him placing her son on his thigh, and the razor was in his hand. She got scared so much that Khubayb noticed the agitation on her face and comforted her, saying, “Are you afraid that I will kill him? No, I will never do so.”
She also made mention of some Karaamaat (i.e.,supernatural abilities or events bestowed by Allah, Exalted is He, upon a righteous person which contradict universal norms and human standards) that happened to Khubayb(may Allah be pleased with him). She said: “By Allah, I never saw a prisoner better than Khubayb. By Allah, one day I saw him eating of a bunch of grapes in his hand while he was chained in irons, and there was no fruit at that time in Makkah.” She used to say, "It was a blessing that Allah, Exalted is He, bestowed upon Khubayb." This was one of the manifest Karaamaat conferred by Allah, Exalted is He, on him.
When they took him out of the Sanctuary (of Makkah) to kill him outside its boundaries, Khubayb(may Allah be pleased with him) requested them to let him offer a two Rak‘ah prayer. They allowed him and he offered two Rak‘ahs and then said, "Had not I been afraid that you would think that I was scared (of being killed), I would have prolonged the prayer. O Allah, kill them all with no exception,” meaning eradicate them all. He (may Allah be pleased with him) then recited the poetic verse, "I am being martyred as a Muslim; I do not mind how I am killed in Allah's Cause, for my killing is for Allah's Sake; and if Allah wishes, He will bless the amputated parts of a torn body."
He (may Allah be pleased with him) meant that he cared less about death, since he was being killed in Allah’s Cause, and Allah, Exalted is He, would bless his torn body, if He willed it. Then the son of Al-Haarith killed him in Al-Tan‘eem and crucified him. It was Khubayb(may Allah be pleased with him) who set the tradition for any Muslim sentenced to death in captivity, to offer a two Rak‘ah prayer (before being killed).
Allah, Exalted is He, answered the invocation of ‘Aasim ibn Thaabit(may Allah be pleased with him) on that very day on which he was martyred; the Prophetﷺinformed his Companions (may Allah be pleased with them) of their news and what had happened to them. ‘Aasim(may Allah be pleased with him) had killed one of the chiefs of Quraysh named ‘Uqbah ibn AbeeMu‘ayt in the Battle of Badr. When the news of ‘Aasim’s death reached the people of Quraysh, they sent some people to fetch a part of his body (i.e., his head) by which he could be recognized, to verify the news. A swarm of wasps, resembling a shady cloud, were sent to hover over ‘Aasim’s dead body and protect him from their messenger, and thus the disbelievers of Quraysh could not cut off anything from his flesh.
The hadeeth highlights a sign of the Prophethood of Muhammad ﷺ.
It also underlines that Allah, Exalted is He, protects and preserves His believing servants both during life and after death, and that attaining martyrdom does not indicate the destruction and defeat of Muslims, but is rather an honor, and an indication of their merits.
It is deduced from the hadeeth that betrayal is unbecoming of a true Muslim, even with those who betray him.
The hadeeth underlines the virtues of ‘Aasim ibn Thaabit Al-Ansaaree and Khubayb ibn ‘Adiyy(may Allah be pleased with them).
The hadeeth affirms the bestowal of Karaamaat on the allies and righteous servants of Allah, Exalted is He, and that He answers their supplications.
.

3051
Salamah ibn Al-Akwa‘ (may Allah be pleased with him) narrated:
A disbelieving spy came to the Prophetﷺwhile he was on a journey. The spy sat with the companions of the Prophetﷺ and started talking and then went away. The Prophetﷺsaid (to his companions), 'Chase and kill him.' So, I killed him. The Prophetﷺ then gave him the belongings of the killed spy (in addition to his share of the spoils of war).
.

Commentary :
Betraying Muslims and spying on them are among the worst sins and misdeeds, especially at times of war.
In this hadeeth, Salamah ibn Al-Akwa‘ (may Allah be pleased with him) narrated that a disbelieving spy came to the Prophetﷺwhile he was on a journey. It was said that this took place during the battle of Hawaazin in 8 A.H., as recorded by Muslim. The Arabic word used in the hadeeth for spy is ‘Ayn, lit. an eye, because a spy’s job is mostly related to vision.
The version of the hadeeth complied by Muslim stated that the spy came riding a red camel. He made it kneel down, extracted a strip of leather from its girth and tethered the camel with it. Then he began to eat with the people and look (curiously around). He ate with the Companions (may Allah be pleased with them) and talked with them so that he would not look suspicious. He started looking around and collecting the needed information. He learned that the Muslims were in a poor condition,in that some of them were on foot and had no riding animals. All of a sudden, he left hurriedly; he went to his camel, untethered it, made it kneel down, mounted it and urged the beast which ran off with him. The Prophetﷺsaid (to his Companions), “Chase and kill him.“ This was because leaving him unharmed would harm the Muslims, as he would convey information to the enemy and expose the Muslims’ weak points. This is contrary to messengers sent by the enemy; they may not be harmed as per the Islamic law, because they are bearers of peace and links of communication, and this reflects the beauty and graciousness of Islam.
Salamah ibn Al-Akwa‘ (may Allah be pleased with him) chased and killed the spy. The Prophet ﷺ gave him all the spy’s belongings, arms, clothes, and riding animal.
It is deduced from the hadeeth that it is allowable to kill awar spy if he comes to the Muslim lands and he is not given security.
It is also inferred therefrom that the spoils of war taken from a killed spy belong to the one who kills him
.

3059
Aslam, the freed slave of ‘Umar ibn Al-Khattaab, (may Allah be pleased with them) narrated that ‘Umar appointed a freed slave of his, called Hunayy, manager of the Himaa (i.e., preserves, protected areas, pasture devoted for grazing the animals of the Zakaah or other specified animals). He (may Allah be pleased with him) said to him, "O Hunayy! Do not oppress the Muslims and ward off their curse (invocations against you) for the invocation of the oppressed is responded to (by Allah); and allow the shepherd having a few camels and those having a few sheep (to graze their animals), and take care not to allow the livestock of ‘Abd Al-Rahmaan ibn ‘Awf and the livestock of (‘Uthmaan) ibn ‘Affaan, for if their livestock should perish, then they have their farms and gardens, while those who own a few camels and those who own a few sheep, if their livestock should perish, would bring their dependents to me and appeal for help saying, 'O Commander of the Believers! O Commander of the Believers!' Would I then neglect them? (No, of course). So, I find it easier to let them have water and grass rather than to give them gold and silver (from the Muslims' treasury). By Allah, these people think that I have been unjust to them. This is their land, and during the pre-Islamic period, they fought for it and they embraced Islam (willingly) while it was in their possession. By Him in Whose Hand my life is! Were it not for the animals (in my custody) which I give to be ridden for striving in Allah's Cause, I would not have turned even a span of their land into a Himaa.”
.

Commentary :
‘Umar ibn Al-Khattaab(may Allah be pleased with him) was an exemplary and just ruler and is still referred to as theepitome of justice and mindfulness of Allah, Exalted is He, regarding Muslims’ funds entrusted to him, and the duty of governing Muslims’ religious and worldly affairs.
In this hadeeth, the Taabi‘ee (Follower) Aslam, the freed slave of ‘Umar ibn Al-Khattaab, narrated that ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him) appointed a freed slave of his, called Hunayy, as the manager of the Himaa (i.e., preserves, protected areas, pasture devoted for grazing the animals of the Zakaah or other specified animals), allocated for grazing the animals (camels, horses, and other animals) of Zakaah that belonged to the Muslim Treasury, and no other animals were allowed to graze therein. ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him) had declared this pasture as Himaa. He (may Allah be pleased with him) said to him, "O Hunayy! Do not oppress the Muslims, and ward off their curse (invocations against you), for the invocation of the oppressed is responded to (by Allah),” as there is no veil between it and Allah, “and allow the shepherd having a few camels” below thirty, “and those having a few sheep (to graze their animals), and take care not to allow the livestock of ‘Abd Al-Rahmaan ibn ‘Awf and the livestock of (‘Uthmaan) ibn ‘Affaan,” because they were rich and owned much livestock. He (may Allah be pleased with him) did not mean that their livestock must be denied access to the Himaa in all cases, but rather when the pasture could only accommodate the livestock of one of the two parties. In this case, the owners of fewerlivestock should be given priority. This was because if the livestock of ‘Abd Al-Rahmaan ibn ‘Awf and the livestock of ‘Uthmaan ibn ‘Affaanwere denied access to the Himaa, they had their farms and gardens, while those who owned fewer camels and sheep, if their livestock were denied access, they would bring their dependents and appeal for help saying, 'O Commander of the Believers! O Commander of the Believers!' He (may Allah be pleased with him) would not let them down and would have to compensate them by paying them gold and silver to satisfy their needs. He (may Allah be pleased with him) said: “So, I find it easier to let them have water and grass rather than to give them gold and silver (from the Muslims' Treasury).” ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him) added: “By Allah, these people,” meaning the owners of few camels and sheep in Al-Madeenah, “think that I have been unjust to them. This is their land, and during the pre-Islamic period, they fought for it, and they embraced Islam (willingly) while it was in their possession.” This is contrary to the situation of those who embraced Islam after conquests and their lands were seized as spoils of war and Fay’ (i.e., war-gains taken by Muslims from the disbelievers without fighting), because their lands and properties were seized by force. It was acceptable for ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him) to do as he did because this protected pasture was uncultivated and deserted, and he (may Allah be pleased with him) declared it Himaa, for the benefit of all Muslims.
‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him) said: “By Him in Whose Hand my life is! Were it not for the animals (in my custody) which I give to be ridden for striving in Allah's Cause,” meaning the camels and horses used for Jihaad purposes, “I would not have turned even a span of their land into a Himaa,” declaring any area as protected pasture and denying Muslims access to it.
The hadeeth underlines ‘Umar’s strength, good judgment, and compassion for Muslims.
The hadeeth warns against the supplication of theoppressed person against the oppressor.
It is deduced from the hadeeth that the pasture must not be allocated for the livestock of rich owners rather than those of the poor ones.
It is also inferred therefrom that the Imaam (i.e., ruler) may investigate different alternatives and opt for what serves the best interests of people.
It is also deduced that the Imaam should give precedence to the interests of the poor people over those of the rich.
.

3060
Hudhayfah(may Allah be pleased with him) narrated:
The Prophetﷺsaid (to us), "List the names of those people who have announced that they are Muslims." So, we listed one thousand and five hundred men. Then we wondered, "Should we be afraid (of disbelievers) although we are one thousand and five hundred in number?" No doubt, we witnessed ourselves being afflicted with such bad trials that one would have to offer the prayer alone in fear.
Al-A‘mash narrated:
"We (listed the Muslims and) found them five hundred." And AbooMu‘aawiyah said, "Between six hundred to seven hundred."
.

Commentary :
In this hadeeth, Hudhayfah ibn Al-Yamaan(may Allah be pleased with him) stated that the Prophet ﷺ commanded to make a list of the Muslims’ names at that time. It was said that this took place during the time of theHudaybiyah Treaty, and the Prophet ﷺ wanted to know the number of Muslims; should any unfortunate event happen and the Muslims had to fight, he ﷺ would know the number of Muslims and who was able to fight. The number was one thousand and five hundred men. Another version of the hadeeth reads: “five hundred,” and a third version reads: “between six hundred and seven hundred.” The Companions (may Allah be pleased with them) wondered, "Should we be afraid (of disbelievers) although we are one thousand and five hundred in number?" It seems that they(may Allah be pleased with them) could not believe the large number of Muslims at that time and believed that it was inconceivable that such a large number of men should be defeated. The version compiled by Muslim reads: “We said, ‘O Messenger of Allah, do you entertain any fear concerning us and we are (at this time) between six hundred and seven hundred (in strength).’” He ﷺ remarked: “You do not perceive; you may be put to some trials.” He (may Allah be pleased with him) said: ”We actually suffered trials so much so that some of our men were forced to offer their prayers in concealment.” This means that such confidence due to numerical superioritywas eliminated when Muslims were afflicted with fear and Fitnah (i.e., dissension and civil strife) after the Prophet’s death, so much so that some used to pray individually out of fear, despite the enormous number of Muslims at that time! Perhaps this referred to the Fitnah that took place after the Prophet’s death when some Muslims used to hide and perform the prayers in secret, fearing prominence and getting caught up in such Fitnah and wars. It was said that this was a reference to the late period of ‘Uthmaan’s reign during the tenure of some governors of Kufa, like Al-Waleed ibn ‘Uqbah, who used to delay the obligatory prayers or failed to establish them as enjoined. During this period, some devout Muslims (who were earnestly mindful of Allah, Exalted is He), used to perform the prayers in secret and then join the (delayed) congregational prayers with the governor, lest it should lead to Fitnah.
The hadeeth highlights a sign of the prophethood of Muhammad ﷺ; he foretold a future event that happened afterward, and Muslims were actually afflicted with worse situations after the lifetime of Hudhayfah(may Allah be pleased with him), during the reigns of Al-Hajjaaj and others.
Many narrations were reported with different numbers. To reconcile between the different narrations, it was said that there may have been several lists of Muslims’ names that were made on various occasions. It is also possible that the narrations mean that the number of Muslims was a total of one thousand and five hundred, including men, women, slaves, and boys, and between six and seven hundred men, and five hundred soldiers in particular. It is also possible that what is meant is that the number of Muslims was five hundred fighters from the people of Al-Madeenah in particular; six hundred to seven hundred fighters and non-fighters; and a thousand and five hundred Muslims including those living in the surrounding towns and villages.
It is deduced that it is allowable for the Imaam (i.e., ruler) to count the number of the ruled when needed to defend and protect the Muslims.
It is inferred that it is allowable to make a register of the soldiers’ names.
It is also deduced from the hadeeth that Allah, Exalted is He, afflicts His servants with punishments for their unwarranted confidence due to numerical superiority. .

1471
Ibn ‘Umar reported that he divorced his wife during her menstruation in the Prophet's lifetime. So, ‘Umar ibn al-Khattāb asked the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) about that and the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) said: "Order him to take her back and keep her until she attains purity, then menstruates, then attains purity. Then, if he wishes he may keep her, and if he wishes he may divorce her before having intercourse with her. This is the ‘Iddah (waiting period) that Allah Almighty has ordered for the divorce of women." [Another version reads]: That he divorced his wife during her menstruation, once. So, the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) commanded him to take her back and keep her until she attains purity, then menstruates again, while still being with him, then to give her time until she attains purity from her menstruation. After that, if he wanted to divorce her, he could do so when she becomes pure before having sexual intercourse with her, as this is the ‘iddah that Allah commanded for the divorce of women. [Another version reads]: On being asked about this, ‘Abdullah said to someone: "If you divorced your wife once or twice, the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) commanded me to do this. However, if you have divorced her thrice, she became forbidden to you until she is married to another man, and you have disobeyed Allah regarding what He commanded you in divorcing your wife.".

Commentary : The legislated divorce is that one divorces his wife one time while being pure (of her menses) without having sexual intercourse with her during this period of purity. It is called Talāq Sunni (Sunnah-compliant divorce). As for the forbidden divorce, it is to divorce one's wife more than once in one utterance, or to divorce her during her menstruation, or during a period of purity in which he had sexual intercourse with her. This is called Talāq Bid‘i (Heretic divorce).
In this Hadīth, ‘Abdullah ibn ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him and his father) narrates that he divorced his wife - her name was Āminah bint Ghifār, and it was said: Āminah bint ‘Ammār, and there are other opinions as well - during her menstruation before attaining purity, and that was in the Prophet's lifetime. His father, ‘Umar ibn al-Khattāb, went to the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) and asked him about the ruling on this divorce that occurred during menstruation, whether it is permissible or not, and whether it counts or not. The Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) commanded him to order his son, ‘Abdullah, to take her back in marriage and keep her with him "until she attains purity" from the menstruation in which he divorced her, "then menstruates" again, "then attains purity" from the second menstruation. After attaining purity from the second menstruation, he could keep her as his wife if he wished or he could divorce her in the second period of purity before having intercourse with her. This state, namely the state of purity, is the time for starting "the ‘Iddah that Allah Almighty has commanded for the divorce," i.e., during which, "women", as Allah Almighty says: {O Prophet, when you [believers] divorce women, divorce them with concern to their waiting period.} [Surat at-Talāq: 1] That is to say, divorce them while receiving their ‘Iddah, i.e., at the time they could start the ‘Iddah, and the period of menstruation is not counted in the ‘Iddah. So, if one divorces during this time, his divorce does not occur in the state commanded by Allah, which is starting and entering the ‘Iddah, when the divorce occurs during the period of her purity not during the period of her menstruation. This is because, during the purity period, she can keep an accurate count of her ‘Iddah, which is three Qurū’ (menstrual cycles), and "qur’" is purity, and it was said: menstruation.
In another version, Muhammad ibn Rumh - one of the Hadīth narrators - added: Whenever ‘Abdullah ibn ‘Umar was asked about divorcing a woman during menstruation, he would say to the questioner: If you divorced your wife once or twice then take her back, as the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) commanded me to do so. However, if you divorced her thrice then this is an irrevocable divorce and you cannot take her back and she becomes forbidden for you "until she is married to another man," and he has sexual intercourse with her and then divorces her. After her ‘Iddah is over, she becomes lawful for you again to marry.
And by doing this, you disobeyed Allah and went against Him "regarding what He commanded you in divorcing your wife" during the purity state in which you had intercourse with her, as Allah Almighty says: {O Prophet, when you [believers] divorce women, divorce them with concern to their waiting period.} [Surat at-Talāq: 1]
This clarifies that the divorce counts, whether it is Sunni or Bid‘i. The fact that the Bid‘i divorce is forbidden does not entail that it does not occur. It only means that whoever does this deliberately is considered sinful, yet the divorce still counts.
In a version of Muslim, Anas ibn Sīrīn said to Ibn ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him and his father): "Was that divorce that you gave her when she was menstruating counted as such?" and you considered it one of the three divorces. "‘Abdullah ibn ‘Umar said: Why would I not count it? (It must be counted) even if I failed and acted foolishly," i.e, failed to fulfill an obligation or acted foolishly and did not fulfill it, or failed to take her back and acted foolishly. Would that be an excuse for him, or would his foolishness make it not count, or would his failure invalidate it?! It is a question of disapproval whose answer is supposed to be: Yes, it is counted, and his failure and foolishness do not prevent it from being counted.
The Hadīth indicates the keenness of Islam to restrict the circumference of divorce as much as possible, and if it happens, it does not cause harm to any of the spouses.
It also indicates that the husband alone has the right to Raj‘ah (taking the wife back) without the guardian..

1472
Ibn ‘Abbās reported: The triple divorce during the lifetime of the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) and that of Abu Bakr and two years of the caliphate of ‘Umar was counted as one. Then ‘Umar ibn al-Khattāb said: "Indeed, people have hastened to a matter regarding which they used to act with deliberation. So, if we would make them count (as three divorces)," and he did that..

Commentary : Allah Almighty has made divorce a kind of respite between the spouses when life between them becomes impossible. In Islam, divorce has certain criteria and results in a number of rights.
In this Hadīth, ‘Abdullah ibn ‘Abbās (may Allah be pleased with him) narrates: During the lifetime of the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) and that of Abu Bakr and two years of ‘Umar's caliphate, whoever triply divorced his wife in one session or in one time, would count as a single divorce. An example of this is saying: "You are divorced thrice," or saying: "You are divorced. You are divorced. You are divorced." Then the husband can take his wife back during the period of ‘Iddah (waiting period) without a new contract. If the ‘Iddah is over, he can take her back with a new contract. It is not counted as three divorces that would make his wife unlawful for him until she is married to another man. It is deemed to refer to what was most likely meant, which was the intent of confirmation, not for continuing the count. During the lifetime of ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him), people used this form frequently while most likely intending to continue the count not by way of confirmation. Hence, ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him) made it count as three divorces. He said: "Indeed, people have hastened to a matter regarding which they used to act with deliberation," i.e., they were entitled to three divorces to give themselves a chance to reconsider their affairs, as it might seem better for them to take their wives back. His saying: "So if we made them count," i.e., He consulted those who were with him from the Companions (may Allah be pleased with them) regarding the one who gave three divorces all at once to make such a divorce an irrevocable triple divorce as he uttered, to deter them from rushing into divorce. Thus, he enforced it on people after consulting the senior Companions and their agreement with him.
This is interpreted from him (may Allah be pleased with him) as a form of Ijtihād and laying down rules that would bring benefit to his subjects within the boundaries of Shariah, without making things too difficult or too easy..

1476
‘Ā’ishah reported: The Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) used to seek our permission on the day he had to stay with one of his wives (by turns) after the following verse was revealed: {You [O Prophet] may postpone [the turn of] whoever you wish [of your wives], and you may share your time with whoever of them you wish.} [Surat al-Ahzāb: 51] Mu‘ādhah said to her: What did you use to say to the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) when he asked your permission? She said: I used to say: Were it up to me, I would not give anyone preference over myself..

Commentary : The Prophet's wives loved him dearly to the extent that they used to compete to please him and show their love to him.
In this Hadīth, the Mother of the Believers ‘Ā’ishah (may Allah be pleased with her) reports that the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) used to ask permission from his wife, whose turn was due, to go to another one of his wives. The Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) had nine wives, and he used to allocate a day for each to stay with her overnight. This act of his seeking permission was after the revelation of the following verse: {You [O Prophet] may postpone [the turn of] whoever you wish [of your wives], and you may share your time with whoever of them you wish, and there is no blame on you if you call back any of those whose turn you have set aside. That is more likely that they will be content and not distressed, and that they will be satisfied with what you give them all. Allah knows what is in your hearts, and Allah is All-Knowing, Most Forbearing.} [Surat al-Ahzāb: 51] This verse means: O Messenger, you have the right to delay the turn of whoever you wish of your wives and not stay overnight with her, and you have the right to share your time with whoever you wish of them and stay overnight with her; and there is no blame on you if you call back any of those whom you have delayed. Giving you the choice and making things flexible for you are more likely to make your wives content and satisfied with what you give them all for knowing that you have not neglected duty and have not withheld a right, and Allah knows what is in your hearts - O men - of inclination to some women apart from others, as Allah is All-Knowing of His slaves' actions and nothing thereof is hidden from Him, and He is Most Forbearing and does not hasten to punish them hoping that they may return to Him in repentance.
The female Tābi‘i Mu‘ādhah al-‘Adawiyyah asked ‘Ā’ishah (may Allah be pleased with her): "What did you use to say to the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) when he asked for your permission?" ‘Ā’ishah (may Allah be pleased with her) replied that she used to say to the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him): "Were it up to me," i.e., if this act of seeking permission is in my hands, "I would not give anyone preference over myself," i.e., I would not give my day to another wife. This was due to her love to be close to the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) to serve him, enjoy intimacy with him, and benefit from him.
Such a competition between his wives was not for mere pleasure, intimacy, personal desires, and enjoyment, as is the case with some people. Instead, it was a competition for matters related to the Hereafter and for being close to the master of the first and the last, for expecting the descent of mercy and revelation upon him while being with her and so on.
The Hadīth clarifies one of the Prophet's exclusive rights, namely choosing whomever he wished from his wives whenever he wished.
It also points out some of the etiquettes between spouses and teaches them how a man should seek his wives' permission when sharing his time with them and how the woman should show him love and affection..

1478
Jābir ibn ‘Abdullah reported: Abu Bakr (may Allah be pleased with him) came and sought permission to see the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him). He found people sitting at his door and none amongst them had been granted permission, but it was granted to Abu Bakr and he went in. Then came ‘Umar and he sought permission and it was granted to him. He found the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) sitting sad and silent with his wives around him, and said: He said: I would say something that would make the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) laugh. So, he said: "O Messenger of Allah, I wish you had seen the daughter of Khārijah when she asked me for extra money, and I got up and slapped her on the neck. The Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) laughed and said: "They are around me as you see, asking for extra money." So, Abu Bakr got up and slapped ‘Ā’ishah on the neck, and ‘Umar got up and slapped Hafsah on the neck. Both of them did this saying: "Are you asking the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) what he does not have?!" They said: "By Allah, we would never ask the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) for something that he does not have." Then he retreated from them for a month or for twenty-nine days. Then, the following verse was revealed to him: {O Prophet, tell your wives} until the part that reads {for those who do good among you a great reward.} [Surat al-Azāb: 28-29] He said: So, he started with ‘Ā’ishah, saying: "O ‘Ā’ishah, I want to propound something to you but I wish you not to be hasty concerning it until you consult your parents." She said: "What is that, O Messenger of Allah?" So he recited the verse to her. She said: "Is it concerning you, O Messenger of Allah, that I should consult my parents?! Nay, I choose Allah, His Messenger, and the Final Abode; but I ask you not to tell any of your wives what I have said." He said: "None of them asks me except that I will inform her. Allah did not send me to be harsh, or cause harm, but He sent me to teach and make things easy.".

Commentary : The Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) was generous with his wives and provided for them from what Allah granted him. However, he used to spend often on the cause of Allah and on what would benefit people, leaving only a little for himself and his family. This led to some harm felt by his wives; however, Allah Almighty gave them the choice to either endure life patiently or get a divorce and be separated from him kindly.
In this Hadīth, Jābir ibn ‘Abdullah (may Allah be pleased with him and his father) narrates: Abu Bakr (may Allah be pleased with him) once came and sought permission to see the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) and found people sitting at his door and none among them was granted permission to see the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him). Then, the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) granted Abu Bakr (may Allah be pleased with him) permission and he entered. Then, ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him) came to the Prophet's house and sought permission to enter and he permitted him. On entering, ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him) found the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) sitting with his wives around him and he was intensely sad, so much so that he stopped talking. So, ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him) said to himself - and it was said: The speaker was Abu Bakr - (may Allah be pleased with him): "I should say something that would make the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) laugh." So, he said: "O Messenger of Allah, I wish you had seen," i.e., if you knew that my wife, the daughter of Khārijah, asked and requested from me an extra amount of money, more than the usual or more than needed, so I got up and "slapped her on the neck," i.e., hit her neck with my hand. So, the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) laughed out of the resemblance between his condition and that of ‘Umar. The Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) said: "They", referring to his wives, are sitting "around me as you see, asking for extra money" and requesting more money than the usual amount. When the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) said this, Abu Bakr (may Allah be pleased with him) got up and went to ‘Ā’ishah (may Allah be pleased with her) to slap her on the neck by way of discipline. ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him) also got up to slap his daughter Hafsah (may Allah be pleased with her) on the neck by way of discipline, and each of them was saying to his daughter: "Are you asking the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) for what he does not have?!" It was an expression of rebuke and reprimand for them because of their asking for an extra amount of money while the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) did not have it. "They said: By Allah, we would never ask the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him)," after this "something that he does not have." The Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) got angry because of this and he retreated from his wives for thirty or twenty-nine days without entering their houses or approaching them. Then, the following verses were revealed: {O Prophet, tell your wives, “If you seek the life of this world and its embellishments, then come, I will give you provision and release you graciously. But if you seek Allah and His Messenger and the Final Abode, then Allah has prepared for those who do good among you a great reward.”} [Surat al-Ahzāb: 28-29] The two verses mean: O Prophet, tell your wives when they ask you for an increase in sustenance and you have nothing to give them as an extra amount: If you seek the life of this world and its embellishments, then come I will give you provision that is given to the divorced women and release you in a way that involves no harm or damage. However, if you seek Allah's pleasure and the pleasure of His Messenger, and you seek Paradise in the Final Abode, then endure your conditions patiently, as Allah has prepared for those who do good among you, through patience and good treatment, a great reward.
The Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) started with ‘Ā’ishah (may Allah be pleased with her) in giving her the choice. He called her and informed her that he had something to propound to her and that he wished she would not hasten to give him a reply without consulting her parents. Perhaps this was out of fear for her because of her young age which entailed the desire for worldly embellishments and her not choosing the Hereafter. She asked the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) about that matter and he recited the verse to her, so she hastened to accept being with the Messenger of Allah, and she said: "Is it concerning you," i.e., being separated from you, or staying with you, or regarding your right, "O Messenger of Allah, that I should consult my parents?!" And she told him that she chose Allah, His Messenger, and the Final Abode. She also asked him (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) not to tell any of his wives about her reply out of her jealousy and keenness to have the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) all for herself and enjoy a great deal of his company. In response, he (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) said: "None of them asks me except that I will inform her," to help her make her choice. He justified this by saying that Allah did not send him to be harsh, i.e., causing someone to be in a difficult situation and "‘anat", meaning difficulty and sin as well, "or cause harm," i.e., seek others' mistakes. "But He sent me to teach" people goodness and make things easy. Facilitation here lies in the fact that if he informed them, his other wives would follow the example of ‘Ā’ishah (may Allah be pleased with her) and it would be easy for them to choose Allah Almighty, His Messenger (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him), and the Final Abode.
This Hadīth points out that asking permission is from the Prophet's guidance.
It also indicates that one can discipline one's child, even if he grew up.
It shows the ascetic life of the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) and his abstention from worldly life.
It also demonstrates how the Companions used to console the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) in his sadness.
It denotes the merit of Abu Bakr, ‘Umar, and ‘Ā’ishah (may Allah be pleased with them)..

1479
‘Umar ibn al-Khattāb reported: When the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) secluded himself from his wives, he ('Umar) said: I entered the mosque and found the people pelting the ground with pebbles and saying: The Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) divorced his wives, and that was before they were commanded with Hijāb. ‘Umar said: I said: I must find this out today. He said: I entered upon ‘Ā’ishah and said: O daughter of Abu Bakr, have you gone to the extent of giving trouble to the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him)?! She said: O Ibn al-Khattāb, stay out of my affairs and mind your receptacle. He said: So, I entered upon Hafsah bint ‘Umar and said to her: O Hafsah, have you gone to the extent of giving trouble to the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him)?! By Allah, you know that the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) does not love you, and had it not been for me, the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) would have divorced you. So, she wept bitterly. I said to her: Where is the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him)? She said: He is in his cabinet in the attic room. I went there and found Rabāh, the servant of the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him), sitting on the attic's doorstep with his legs dangling on carved wood, which is a trunk used by the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) to ascend and descend. I called out: O Rabāh, seek permission for me from the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him). Rabāh looked at the room then looked at me and said nothing. Then, I said: O Rabāh, seek permission for me from the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him). Rabāh looked at the room then looked at me and said nothing. Then, I raised my voice and said: O Rabāh, seek permission for me from the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him). I think the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) thought I had come for Hafsah's sake. By Allah, if the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) commands me to strike her neck, I will undoubtedly strike her neck. I raised my voice, and he signaled to me to ascend. I entered upon the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) while he was lying on a straw mat. I sat down and he drew up his lower garment over him and he had nothing else on him, and the mat had left marks on his side. I looked around in the cabinet of the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) and found only a handful of barley around one Sā‘ and an equal quantity of the leaves of mimosa flava placed in one side of the room, and a semi-tanned leather bag hanging. He said: Tears started falling from my eyes. He said: O Ibn al-Khattāb, what makes you weep? I said: O Prophet of Allah, how could I not weep when this straw mat has left marks on your side and I see nothing in your cabinet except what I have seen, while Caesar and Khosrau are enjoying fruits and rivers, whereas you are the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) and His chosen one and this is your cabinet?! He said: O Ibn al-Khattāb, does it not please you that the Hereafter is for us and the worldly life is for them? I said: Yes. He said: When I entered upon him, I saw signs of anger on his face, so I said: O Messenger of Allah, what trouble have the women caused you? If you had divorced them, verily, Allah is with you, His angels, Jibrīl (Gabriel), Mikā’īl (Michael), I, Abu Bakr, and the believers are with you. I rarely spoke - thanks to Allah - any words except that I hoped Allah would confirm the words I uttered, and this verse, Āyat at-Takhyīr (the Verse of Choice), was revealed: {Perhaps, if he were to divorce you all, his Lord would replace you with better wives.} [Surat at-Tahrīm: 5] {But if you insist on conspiring against him, then indeed Allah is his Protector, as well as Gabriel and the righteous believers, and moreover, the angels are his supporters.} [Surat at-Tahrīm: 4] ‘Ā’ishah bint Abi Bakr and Hafsah were cooperating against the rest of the Prophet's wives. I said: O Messenger of Allah, did you divorce them? He said: No. I said: O Messenger of Allah, when I entered the mosque, I found the Muslims pelting the ground with pebbles and saying: The Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) divorced his wives. Should I go down and tell them that you did not divorce them? He said: Yes, if you wish. I kept talking to him until there were no more signs of anger on his face and until he laughed and his teeth showed, and he had the most charming front teeth of all people. Then, the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) descended and I descended while catching hold of the trunk, but the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) went down as if he was walking on the ground without touching it with his hand. I said: O Messenger of Allah, you remained in your room for twenty-nine days. He said: The month consists of twenty-nine days. I, thus, stood at the door of the mosque and called out at the top of my voice: The Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) did not divorce his wives, and this verse was revealed: {Whenever they hear any news of security or fear, they spread it. If they referred it to the Messenger or to those in authority among them, those with sound judgment among them could know it.} [Surat an-Nisā’: 83] And it was I who drew correct conclusions and Allah Almighty revealed the Verse of Choice..

Commentary : Perhaps the Prophet's wives caused him trouble like women usually cause their husbands trouble, resulting from jealousy, vexation, and the like.
In this Hadīth, ‘Umar ibn al-Khattāb (may Allah be pleased with him) narrates that when the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) secluded himself from his wives and swore not to enter upon them, for he was angry with them, ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with them) entered the Prophet's mosque "and found the people pelting the ground with pebbles," i.e., moving them around and throwing them on the ground, which is something normally done by someone concerned and absorbed in thought. "And saying: The Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) divorced his wives," i.e. when they saw how the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) kept himself away from his wives, they thought that he had divorced them, so they said this. "And that was before they were commanded with Hijāb," i.e., women conceal themselves from men. This remark is questionable; rather, it is a clear mistake since Hijāb was enjoined at the time of the Prophet's marriage to Zaynab bint Jahsh (may Allah be pleased with her) in the fourth or fifth year, and Zaynab (may Allah be pleased with her) was among his wives who were given the choice; and the story of his seclusion from his wives and giving them the choice took place in the ninth year of Hijrah. The best thing said with this regard to: "that it was before they were commanded with Hijāb" is from the words of the narrator who, when seeing that 'Umar (may Allah be pleased with him) said he had entered upon 'Ā’ishah (may Allah be pleased with her), thought that this was before Hijāb, so he affirmed it. This could be responded by saying: Entering does not entail removing Hijāb (screen), for he could enter from the door, and she could still talk to him from behind the screen.
Then, ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him) reported that he said to himself: "I must find this out today," i.e., I must find out the truth about this, did the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) divorce them or not? So, ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him) entered upon ‘Ā’ishah (may Allah be pleased with her), the Prophet's wife and Abu Bakr's daughter, and said to her: "O daughter of Abu Bakr, have you gone to the extent of giving trouble to the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him)?!" blaming her for daring to infuriate the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him). ‘Ā’ishah (may Allah be pleased with her) said: "O Ibn al-Khattāb, stay out of my affairs," i.e., you are not entitled to admonish me "and mind your receptacle," i.e., rather, you should admonish the one who matters to you, referring to Hafsah bint ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with her). "‘Aybah" (receptacle): the container used for keeping clothes and precious belongings. A man's "‘aybah": his family and those close to him. Then, ‘Umar entered upon his daughter Hafsah and said to her what he had said to ‘Ā’ishah (may Allah be pleased with them) and added reprovingly: "By Allah, you know that the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) does not love you, and had it not been for me, the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) would have divorced you," deterring and frightening her with divorce and the fact that if it had not been for ‘Umar's special status with the Prophet, this would have occurred. Thereupon, Hafsah cried bitterly because of her sadness about being separated from the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) and expecting her father to be severely mad at her. Then, ‘Umar asked his daughter (may Allah be pleased with both of them) where the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) was. Hafsah (may Allah be pleased with her) said: "He is in his cabinet in the attic room." "Mashrubah" (attic room): is an elevated room for storing food and drink. On entering, 'Umar found Rabāh (may Allah be pleased with him), the Prophet's servant, "sitting on the attic's doorstep," i.e., on the doorsill "with his legs dangling," i.e., stretching and hanging them "on carved wood", which is a trunk that had stairs used by the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) to ascend to the room and descend from that place using it as a stair. ‘Umar, then, called out to Rabāh (may Allah be pleased with both of them) to seek permission for him to enter upon the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him). So, Rabāh looked inside the room, then, looked at ‘Umar and said nothing. This indirectly indicates that the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) had heard ‘Umar's voice; however, he expressed no approval or disapproval of permitting him. So, ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him) again sought permission from the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him), and Rabāh again looked at the room then looked at ‘Umar and said nothing. On the third time, ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him) raised his voice so the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) would hear him and he called out: "O Rabāh, seek permission for me from the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him). I think that the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) thought I had come for Hafsah's sake," i.e., to apologize for what she did and defend her. "By Allah, if the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) commands me to strike her neck, I will certainly strike her neck." This clarified why he sought permission, namely to console the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) and bring him out of his sadness and not for anything related to his daughter Hafsah (may Allah be pleased with her). Rabāh, thus, signaled with his head to ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him) after the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) had permitted him to ascend to him in his attic.
On entering upon the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him), ‘Umar saw him "lying on a straw mat," i.e., lying on his side on the straw mat. Another version in the two "Sahīh Collections" reads: "And he was on a straw mat with nothing between him and the mat," i.e., he was lying thereon without any bedding. "Hasīr" (straw mat): a mat made of palm leaf stalks or others things. 'Umar (may Allah be pleased with him) sat down, so the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) drew up his lower garment over his body to cover it more. "Izār" (lower garment): it is the garment used to cover the lower part of the body. The Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) was not wearing anything except this lower garment. "and the mat had left marks on his side," i.e., it left marks on his side as a result of sleeping on it. 'Umar (may Allah be pleased with him) looked around, exploring the room where the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) was staying and found nothing but a handful - i.e., a pile - of barley equal to one Sā '. Sā‘: it is four Mudds, and one Mudd is equal to an amount that could fill both hands. He found an equal amount of "the leaves of mimosa flava placed in one side of the room," i.e., in one of its sides and at a distance from the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him). It is said that "Qarazh" (mimosa flava) means: a kind of tree used in tanning leather. "And a semi-tanned leather bag hanging," which is leather that is not yet tanned. All this indirectly indicates the threadbareness of the place where the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) was staying and the straitened circumstances he was living in.
‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him) said: "Tears started falling from my eyes," i.e., tears started flowing by way of sympathy for the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him). The Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) asked him about the reason for his weeping, so ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him) replied: "O Prophet of Allah, how could I not weep when this straw mat has left marks on your side and I see nothing in your cabinet except what I see, while Caesar and Khosrau are enjoying fruits and rivers, whereas you are the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) and His chosen one and this is your cabinet?!" All this serves as an indirect reference to the bliss that the disbelievers enjoy compared to the conditions of the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him). What ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him) meant is that the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) and the Muslims are more entitled to this bliss than the disbelievers. Khosrau: it is the title of the Persians' king. Caesar: it is the title of the Romans' king. The Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) said: "O Ibn al-Khattāb, does it not please you that the Hereafter is for us and the worldly life is for them?" In this way, the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) explained to him the logic of the worldly pleasures and that of the Hereafter, as part of Allah's immutable rule regarding His slaves is to make the disbelievers enjoy the worldly pleasures. In contrast, His believing slaves will enjoy the enjoyments of the Hereafter, taking into consideration the contradiction between these two types of pleasures and the believers' eternal abidance in the bliss of Paradise and, on the contrary, the disbelievers' eternal abidance in Hellfire. ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him) said: "Yes" it pleases me, O Messenger of Allah. There were signs of anger on the Prophet's face that ‘Umar noticed the moment he entered, so, ‘Umar said to him: "O Messenger of Allah, what trouble have the women caused you?" He was trying to alleviate the Prophet's sadness and anger. In other words, no trouble will befall you, and you should not care about any of their affairs. "If you had divorced them, verily, Allah is with you, His angels, Jibrīl (Gabriel):" the angel entrusted with the revelation, "Mikā’īl (Michael):" the angel entrusted with the rain and plants, "I, Abu Bakr, and the believers are with you" also with our support and assistance in Da‘wah (call to Allah) and the divine message. ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him) reported that he rarely spoke - thanks be to Allah for this - words except that he hoped Allah would confirm the words he uttered, i.e., he was secretly asking Allah to confirm the soundness of his advice to the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) with Qur’an. 'Umar (may Allah be pleased with him) was then informed that the Verse of Choice was revealed to confirm his speech with the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him). It is the verse where the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) gave his wives the choice either to remain as his wives or to be divorced and released, as Allah Almighty says: {But if you insist on conspiring against him, then indeed Allah is his Protector, as well as Gabriel and the righteous believers, and moreover, the angels are his supporters. Perhaps, if he were to divorce you all, his Lord would replace you with better wives.} [Surat at-Tahrīm: 4-5] It is said: There is no choice in these verses and mentioning it here is a delusion. In Al-Bukhāri's version, it was reported that ‘Umar ibn al-Khattāb (may Allah be pleased with him) reported: "The Prophet's wives backed each other against him out of jealousy, so, I said to them: Perhaps, if he were to divorce you all, his Lord would replace you with better wives; and so this verse was revealed." The sound opinion here is what was proven in the two Sahīh Collections and others, namely that the Verse of Choice is the verse where Allah Almighty says: {O Prophet, tell your wives, “If you seek the life of this world and its embellishments, then come, I will give you provision and release you graciously. But if you seek Allah and His Messenger and the Final Abode, then Allah has prepared for those who do good among you a great reward.”} [Surat al-Ahzāb: 28-29] It is said: There is a missing "and" probably in his saying: "The Verse of Choice", and the correct view is: "This verse and the Verse of Choice were revealed".
He reported that 'Ā’ishah and Hafsah (may Allah be pleased with both of them) used to cooperate against the rest of the Prophet's wives, forming a team together. The cause behind their excessive jealousy was divulging his secret, which made him upset and angry. ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him), then, asked the Messenger of Allah (may Allah be pleased with him) if he had divorced his wives, trying to find out the truth about what people were saying in the mosque. The Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) negated divorcing his wives, and 'Umar (may Allah be pleased with him) informed him of how the people felt sad for the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) because of what was circulated about him divorcing his wives. 'Umar (may Allah be pleased with him), then asked for the Prophet's permission to go down to the people, inform them of the correct news, and clarify the truth for them to rejoice. The Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) agreed and said to him: "If you wish," i.e. if you like and want to do so.
‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him) reported that he kept talking to the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) until there were no more signs of anger on his face and his teeth showed from laughing. "And he had the most charming front teeth of all people." "Thaghr" (front teeth): the mouth and front teeth. Then, the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) descended from the attic where he had been staying in seclusion, and ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him) descended while catching hold of the trunk and resting on it. The Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) went down "as if he was walking on the ground without touching it with his hand," i.e., he did not need to rest on the trunk when coming down due to his strength. ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him) said: "O Messenger of Allah, you remained in your room for twenty-nine," i.e., there is one day left to complete a month, as the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) swore not to have intercourse with his wives for a month. Thereupon, the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) said: "The month consists of twenty-nine," i.e., this month was twenty-nine days. ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him) stood at the door of the mosque and called out at the top of his voice: "The Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) did not divorce his wives", telling and informing the Prophet's Companions that the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) did not divorce his wives contrary to what they had been saying, and this verse was revealed: {Whenever they hear any news of security or fear, they spread it. If they referred it to the Messenger or those in authority among them, those with sound judgment could know it.} [Surat an-Nisā’: 83] When the people said that the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) had divorced his wives based on no information from anyone and without verifying or checking this out, Allah Almighty blamed them because if they had referred this to the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him), he would have informed them of the truth about it, or they could have referred it to someone who could ask and find out the truth about it from the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him). ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him) said: "And it was I who drew correct conclusions," i.e., verified this matter and checked it out.
"And Allah Almighty revealed the Verse of Choice," as previously mentioned. In the two Sahīh Collections, it was mentioned that ‘Ā’ishah (may Allah be pleased with her) said: He started with me as the first woman. The Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) said: "I will mention something, but you should only hasten if you consult your parents. She said: Indeed, I know my parents would not order me to leave you." Al-Bukhāri's version reads: "Then, he gave all of his wives the choice, and they said the same as what ‘Ā’ishah had said."
In some narrations in the two Sahīh Collections, the following was reported: The Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) kept himself secluded from his wives because of the honey he used to drink in the house of Zaynab bint Jahsh. 'Ā’ishah (may Allah be pleased with her) said: "I agreed with Hafsah that the one upon whom the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) would enter should say: I can detect the smell of Maghāfīr in you, did you eat Maghāfīr - Maghāfīr: sweet gum that has a foul odor. When he entered upon one of them, she said that to him, and he said: No, but I drank honey in the house of Zaynab bint Jahsh, and I will not drink it again. Thereupon, this verse was revealed: {O Prophet, why do you prohibit [yourself from] what Allah has made lawful to you} to: {You both had better turn to Allah in repentance.} [Surat at-Tahrīm: 1-4] to ‘Ā’ishah and Hafsah, {And [remember] when the Prophet told one of his wives something in secret} [Surat at-Tahrīm: 3], as he said: No, but I drank honey." It is said: The reason is that the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) had sexual intercourse with his bondmaid Māriyah in the house of Hafsah (may Allah be pleased with her) and Hafsah (may Allah be pleased with her) learned about it. So, the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) ordered her not to inform ‘Ā’ishah (may Allah be pleased with her). However, Hafsah (may Allah be pleased with her) revealed the Prophet's secret to ‘Ā’ishah (may Allah be pleased with her). It is also said: The reason is the things they did as a whole that enraged the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) and not a specific incident.
The Hadīth shows the Prophet's good morals and how he would honor whoever smiled at him by smiling back at him.
It also indicates the manifest merit of ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him).
It points out how a man should advise his daughter and fix her manners towards her husband.
It also signifies that putting a lot of pressure on women is something dispraised.
It encourages favoring the Hereafter by performing acts of obedience, avoiding sins, and refraining from being preoccupied with the pursuit of worldly pleasures..

1480
Abu Is-hāq reported: I was with Al-Aswad ibn Yazīd sitting in the grand mosque, and Ash-Sha‘bi was with us, and he narrated the Hadīth of Fātimah bint Qays: The Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) entitled her to no housing or financial maintenance. Then, Al-Aswad took a handful of pebbles and threw it at him and said: Woe to you! How could you narrate this?! ‘Umar said: We must not abandon the Book of Allah and the Sunnah of our Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) on account of a woman's statement. We do not know whether she memorized or forgot. She is entitled to housing and financial maintenance. Allah Almighty says: {Do not force them out of their houses, nor should they leave unless they commit a clear shameful act.} [Surat at-Talāq: 1].

Commentary : Allah has prescribed divorce after sparing no effort in reconciliation between the spouses. He has clarified its rulings and consequences, and He has made it three incidents of divorce so that each of the spouses would reconsider his stance; otherwise, they should be separated after the third incident of divorce, and the woman becomes unlawful for him after that until she is married to another man.
This Hadīth is related to a story mentioned in the two Sahīh Collections and others about the female Companion Fātimah bint Qays (may Allah be pleased with her) who was triply divorced by her husband. The Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) commanded her to move to the house of Ibn' Umm Maktūm - who was her cousin and was blind - and spend her 'Iddah (waiting period) there. He made her not entitled to financial maintenance for her particular case, as she used to offend her husband's family verbally or because she was in a desolate area and it was feared that someone might assault her; hence, he moved her to the house of Ibn' Umm Maktūm, as he was blind and would not see her. Fātimah bint Qays kept on narrating this Hadīth of hers after the Prophet's death; however, a group of the Companions disapproved of it. The Tābi‘i Abu Is-hāq as-Sabī‘i narrates that he was with Al-Aswad ibn Yazīd an-Nakha‘i - one of the Tābi‘is - in the great mosque, i.e., the grand mosque, which refers to the mosque of Kūfah, while Ash-Sha‘bi - ‘Āmir ibn Sharāhīl one of the Tābi‘is - was narrating the Hadīth of Fātimah bint Qays in this mosque, i.e., giving a legal fatwa based on this Hadīth. In this Hadīth, it is stated that the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) did not make Fātimah entitled to housing or financial maintenance after being triply divorced. So, Al-Aswad took a handful of pebbles and threw them at him and said: "Woe to you!", i.e., may Allah afflict you with ruin and destruction. It was a common saying among the Arabs that was not intended as a supplication. "How could you narrate this?!" All this was meant to express Al-Aswad's disapproval of Ash-Sha‘bi's narration of this Hadīth. Then, he informed him that ‘Umar ibn al-Khattāb (may Allah be pleased with him) said: "We must not abandon the Book of Allah and the Sunnah of our Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) on account of a woman's statement," i.e., we do not rely on issuing a Fatwa (legal opinion) like this on the Hadīth of Fātimah, given the importance of such a Fatwa, because she might have memorized it in the wrong way or she might have forgotten. Perhaps what ‘Umar meant by the Prophet's Sunnah was what his rulings indicated of adhering to the Book of Allah not a specific Sunnah in this regard. ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him), then, supported his saying that the triply divorced woman is entitled to housing and financial maintenance in her ‘Iddah by the verse in which Allah Almighty says: {O Prophet, when you [believers] divorce women, divorce them with consideration to their waiting period and keep a precise count of the waiting period, and fear Allah, your Lord. Do not force them out of their houses, nor should they leave unless they commit a clear shameful act.} [Surat at-Talāq: 1] In other words: O people, fear Allah your Lord and beware of disobeying Him by transgressing His limit; do not force your divorced wives out of their houses, where you made them live before divorce, until their ‘Iddah is over. "Shameful act" here refers to recalcitrance and bad morals. It is said: It means indecency towards her husband's family. It is also said that it means: Unless they commit adultery.
The Hadīth of Fātimah bint Qays was refuted by a group of the Companions, including ‘Umar, ‘Ā’ishah, and others who knew the Sunnah better than Fātimah bint Qays. Some considered the apparent meaning of the Hadīth and, thus, made the triply divorced woman entitled to spend her 'Iddah wherever she chooses without being obliged to spend the night at her ex-husband's house.
The Hadīth shows how a scholar should be corrected, even in his gatherings of knowledge, if he is mistaken.
It also highlights the Companions' keenness on adhering to the Qur’an and the authentic Sunnah..

1480
‘Ubaydullah ibn ‘Abdullah ibn ‘Utbah reported: Abu ‘Amr ibn Hafs ibn al-Mughīrah set out along with ‘Ali ibn Abi Tālib to Yemen. He sent to his wife, Fātimah bint Qays, one pronouncement of divorce that was still left from her divorce. He commanded Al-Hārith ibn Hishām and ‘Ayyāsh ibn Abi Rabī‘ah to give her alimony. They said to her: By Allah, there is no alimony for you unless you are pregnant. Thereupon, she went to the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) and informed him of what they had said. He said: There is no alimony for you. She, then, asked his permission to move, and he permitted her. She said: O Messenger of Allah, where? He said: To the house of Ibn ’Umm Maktūm, as he was blind and she could take off her clothes in his presence and he would not see her. When her ‘Iddah (waiting period) was over, the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) gave her in marriage to Usāmah ibn Zayd. Marwān sent Qabīsah ibn Dhu’ayb to ask her about the Hadīth, and she narrated it to him, whereupon Marwān said: We have not heard this Hadīth except from a woman. We shall adopt a safe path that we have found people upon. On hearing what Marwān said, Fātimah said: The Qur’an is between me and you. Allah Almighty says: {Do not force them out of their houses.} [Surat at-Talāq: 1] She said: This is regarding revocable divorce. What happens after the three? Why do you say there is no alimony for her if she is not pregnant? Then, on what grounds do you restrain her?.

Commentary : Allah has prescribed divorce and clarified its rulings and consequences after sparing no effort in reconciliation between the spouses. He has made it three incidents of divorce so that each of the spouses would reconsider their stance; otherwise, they should be separated after the third incident of divorce, and the woman becomes unlawful for him after that until she is married to another man.
In this Hadīth, the Tābi‘i ‘Ubaydullah ibn ‘Abdullah ibn ‘Utbah reports that the Companion Abu ‘Amr ibn Hafs ibn al-Mughīrah (may Allah be pleased with him) set out on a journey along with ‘Ali ibn Abi Tālib (may Allah be pleased with him) to Yemen when the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) sent him there. Abu ‘Amr (may Allah be pleased with him) sent to his wife Fātimah bint Qays a pronouncement of divorce while traveling. He had previously divorced her twice and had taken her back, and this was the third incident that made the divorce irrevocable. Abu ‘Amr (may Allah be pleased with him) commanded Al-Hārith ibn Hishām and ‘Ayyāsh ibn Abi Rabī‘ah (may Allah be pleased with both of them) to give her alimony. Another version narrated by Muslim reads: "He sent his deputy to her with barley, " but Fātimah declined it because she found it inadequate and did not accept it. They said to her: "By Allah, there is no alimony for you" because you are irrevocably divorced, and alimony is not for someone in your case "unless you are pregnant". In the version of An-Nasā’i: "So, she sent to Al-Hārith and 'Ayyāsh asking them for the alimony that was appointed for her by her husband, and they said: By Allah, no alimony is due on us for her unless she is pregnant, and she is not entitled to live in our house except with our permission." Thereupon, Fātimah went to the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) and informed him of what they had said, namely that she was not entitled to alimony unless she was pregnant. The Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) approved of what they had said and said to her: "There is no alimony for you." She then sought the Prophet's permission to move from her house, where she was divorced, as she was afraid for herself. The Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) permitted her to move to the house of her cousin Ibn' Umm Maktūm as he was blind and would not see her when taking off her clothes. His permission for her to go out is justified by the fact that he permitted her to move for an excuse, namely her indecency towards her husband's relatives or her fear that she might be assaulted, as mentioned in the narrations. However, if there is no need, then it is impermissible for her to go out or move, and it is forbidden to move her. Allah Almighty says: {Do not force them out of their houses, nor should they leave unless they commit a clear shameful act.} [Surat at-Talāq: 1] "Shameful act" here refers to recalcitrance and bad morals. It is said: It means indecency towards her husband's family. It is also said that it means: Unless they commit adultery.
When her 'Iddah was over, the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) gave her in marriage to Usāmah ibn Zayd (may Allah be pleased with him and his father) for knowing that he was religious, virtuous, had good morals and noble traits.
At that time, Marwān ibn al-Hakam was the ruler of Madīnah. He sent Qabīsah ibn Dhu’ayb to Fātimah (may Allah be pleased with her) to ask about this Hadīth, and she narrated it to him. The reason why Marwān asked her was mentioned in the version of An-Nasā’i: "'Abdullah ibn' Amr ibn' Uthmān, being a young man in the emirate of Marwān, divorced the daughter of Sa‘īd ibn Zayd and her mother was Bint Qays al-Battah. So, her maternal aunt, Fātimah bint Qays, sent to her commanding her to move from the house of 'Abdullah ibn' Amr. When Marwān heard about that, he sent to the daughter of Sa‘īd, commanding her to return to her house and asking her why she moved from her house before completing her 'Iddah." She informed him of the Hadīth of Fātimah, thereupon, Marwān was sent to Fātimah to verify this Hadīth. After hearing her Hadīth, Marwān said: "We have not heard this Hadīth except from a woman," by way of disapproval, and before Marwān, ‘Umar ibn al-Khattāb and ‘Ā’ishah (may Allah be pleased with both of them) expressed their disapproval of Fātimah's Hadīth. Marwān said: "We shall adopt a safe path that we found people upon," i.e., what is reliable, strong, and authentic and what people held fast upon and adhered to and acted upon. In other words, we shall adopt the opinion that a woman must not leave her house except after her ‘Iddah is over and that there is no alimony for her. On hearing what Marwān said and how he prevented the irrevocably divorced woman from leaving her house under all circumstances, Fātimah (may Allah be pleased with her) said: The Qur’an is between me and you, Allah Almighty says: {Do not force them out of their houses.} [Surat at-Talāq: 1] Taking this as supporting evidence, she said: This prohibition, which is understood from the first part of the verse, addresses the husband who can take back his wife, i.e., the housing is for the divorced woman whose divorce is revocable, which accords with what Allah Almighty says: {Then when they have approached the end of their waiting period, either retain them honorably or part with them honorably.} [Surat at-Talāq: 2] She said: So, what happens after the three incidents of divorce? How do you prevent her from going out, then, you say: There is no alimony for her unless she is pregnant? Then, on what grounds do you restrain her? She said this as an objection to Marwān, who made the irrevocably divorced woman entitled to housing and prevented her from going out without giving her financial maintenance. To sum up, her objection was: If you do not make the alimony obligatory, how could you prevent her from going out if the alimony is the recompense of being restrained?!.

1481
‘Ā’ishah reported: It is no good for Fātimah to mention this. He said: She was referring to her statement: No housing or financial maintenance..

Commentary : Allah has prescribed divorce for spouses who choose separation after exerting their utmost in reconciliation between them. He has made it three incidents of divorce so that each of the two spouses would reconsider their stance. Otherwise, they would be separated after the third incident of divorce, and she becomes unlawful for him after this until she gets married to another man. Islam has also regulated the rights and duties between spouses after divorce.
In this Hadīth, Muhammad ibn al-Qāsim narrates that when the Mother of the Believers ‘Ā’ishah (may Allah be pleased with her) was informed of what Fātimah bint Qays had said, namely that her husband had divorced her thrice and the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) did not make her entitled to housing or financial maintenance during her ‘Iddah (waiting period), she said disapprovingly: "It is no good for Fātimah" bint Qays "to mention" and narrate "this" Hadīth to people because it contradicts the explicit texts of the Book of Allah Almighty and the Sunnah of His Messenger (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him).
A group of the Companions, including ‘Umar, ‘Ā’ishah and others, rejected the Hadīth of Fātimah bint Qays because it contradicts, in their opinion, the verse in which Allah Almighty says: {O Prophet, when you [believers] divorce women, divorce them with concern to their waiting period and keep an accurate count of the waiting period, and fear Allah, your Lord. Do not force them out of their houses, nor should they leave unless they commit a clear shameful act. Such are the limits ordained by Allah.} [Surat at-Talāq: 1] It is said: The Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) commanded her to leave her house and spend her 'Iddah in the house of Ibn' Umm Maktūm and did not make her entitled to financial maintenance only because of her special case, as she used to verbally offend her husband's family, or because she was in a desolate place and it was feared that her husband or anyone else might assault her. 'Ā’ishah (may Allah be pleased with her) censured her narration..

1482
Fātimah bint Qays reported that she said: "O Messenger of Allah, my husband divorced me thrice, and I am afraid that my house will be broken into." So, he commanded her, and she moved (to another house)..

Commentary : Allah has prescribed divorce for spouses who choose separation after exerting their utmost in attempting reconciliation between them. He has made it three divorces; so that each of the two spouses would reconsider their stance. Otherwise, they would be separated after the third divorce, and she becomes unlawful for him after this until she gets married to another man. Islam has also regulated the rights and duties between spouses after divorce. Allah Almighty has commanded the divorced woman - whether the divorce is revocable or irrevocable - to spend the ‘Iddah (waiting period) in her house. Allah Almighty says: {O Prophet, when you [believers] divorce women, divorce them with concern to their waiting period and keep an accurate count of the waiting period, and fear Allah, your Lord. Do not force them out of their houses, nor should they leave unless they commit a clear shameful act. Such are the limits ordained by Allah.} [Surat at-Talāq: 1]
In this Hadīth, Fātimah bint Qays (may Allah be pleased with her) narrates that she came to the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) and said: "O Messenger of Allah, my husband divorced me thrice," so the divorce was irrevocable and final. "And I am afraid that my house will be broken into" during her stay in his house for her ‘Iddah. "Iqtihām" (breaking into): entering quickly. This means: She was afraid that someone would enter upon her and harm her because she was in a desolate place. Thereupon, the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) commanded her to leave that place and she went to the house of her paternal cousin, Ibn ’Umm Maktūm, because he was blind, and she could take off her clothes without him seeing her. Since she did not spend her ‘Iddah in her husband's house, the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) did not make her entitled to habitation or financial sustenance during her ‘Iddah..

1483
Jābir ibn ‘Abdullah reported: My maternal aunt was divorced, and she wanted to harvest her date palm trees. A man rebuked her for going out, so she went to the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) who said: "Yes, go out and harvest your date palm trees, for you may give (some of it) in charity or do a good deed.".

Commentary : The Islamic Shariah has brought facilitation and goodness to people. It takes into consideration their conditions when carrying out the Shariah rulings to prevent them from falling into difficulty or distress.
In this Hadīth, Jābir ibn ‘Abdullah (may Allah be pleased with him and his father) narrates that his maternal aunt - it was said: her name is Asmā’ - was irrevocably divorced, as mentioned in the version of Abu Dāwūd: "My maternal aunt was divorced thrice." She wanted to go out, during her ‘Iddah (waiting period), to collect the fruits from her date palm trees; however, a man rebuked her and forbade her from going out until her ‘Iddah was over. She went to the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) to ask him. She informed him of what had happened and of her condition and her need for harvesting her date palm trees and asked him if it was permissible for her to go out of her house during her ‘Iddah due to this necessity. The Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessing be upon him) replied saying: "Yes," and the version of Abu Dāwūd reads: "Go out," and collect your fruits, for perhaps after collecting the fruit of your date palm trees you may give part of it in charity to the poor and the needy "or do a good deed." "Ma‘rūf" (good deed): a comprehensive name including every known act of obeying Allah and doing good to people. This is an explanation of permitting the act of going out, even though it came in the form of notifying and urging her to do good. Moreover, he permitted her to go out due to her need to look after her interests, her date palm trees, and her properties as understood from the apparent indication of the beginning of the Hadīth.
Perhaps the difference between charity and a good deed is that the former refers to obligatory charity, while the latter refers to voluntary charity. The Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) said this to her only because he knew that she was a charitable person, who used to do good deeds frequently, or he answered her with what would guide her to charity and voluntary charity, and this denotes obvious kindness and wisdom.
The Hadīth implies guiding the questioner to what is good for him in his religion and worldly matters and adding to the response what the questioner needs.
It also indicates the permissibility of going out for the divorced woman during her ‘Iddah for a necessity and for fulfilling her interests that she cannot dispense with.
It denotes the permissibility of being keen on preserving wealth and acquiring it to do good and use it in consoling others.
It also indicates that charity in dates is to be given at the time of their harvest, and gifting others therefrom.
It also includes giving an indirect reference to the dates' owner to give charity and reminding him of good deeds and beneficence..

1493
Sa‘īd ibn Jubayr reported: I was asked about the two who swore the oath of condemnation during the governance of Mus‘ab; should they be separated? I did not know what to say, so I went to Ibn ‘Umar's house in Makkah. I said to the servant: Seek permission for me. He said: He is taking a nap; but he heard my voice and said: Is this Ibn Jubayr? I said: Yes. He said: Come in. By Allah, you have not come at this time except for a need. I entered and found him lying on a saddlecloth and resting his head on a fibre-filled pillow. I said: O Abu ‘Abdur-Rahmān, should the two involved in a case of Li‘ān (oath of condemnation) be separated? He said: Glory be to Allah! Yes. The first one who asked about this was so-and-so, the son of so-and-so. He said: O Messenger of Allah, what if any of us found his wife committing adultery? What should he do? If he were to say anything, his statement would be a horrible matter, and if he were to remain silent, his silence about the matter would also be terrible. He said: The Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) kept silent and did not answer him. Later on, he came to him and said: I have been afflicted with what I asked you about. Thereupon, Allah Almighty revealed these verses of Surat an-Nūr: {As for those who accuse their wives [of adultery]} [Surat an-Nūr: 6] So, he recited them to him, admonished and reminded him, and informed him that the worldly punishment is less severe than the punishment of the Hereafter. He said: No, by the One Who sent you with the truth I did not lie about her. Then, he called her, admonished and reminded her and informed her that the worldly punishment is less severe than the punishment of the Hereafter. She said: No, by the One Who sent you with the truth, he is a liar. So, he started with the man who testified four times by Allah that he was truthful and the fifth time that the curse of Allah would be upon him if he were a liar. Then, the woman came next, and she testified four times by Allah that he was a liar and the fifth time that Allah's wrath would be upon her if he were truthful. Then, he separated the two of them..

Commentary : The noble Shariah has clarified the rulings of marriage between the man and the woman and has explained the rulings of the husband's accusation of his wife for committing adultery without evidence and the consequent practice of Li‘ān, besides other rulings of separation, to protect lineages, repel shame from the spouses, and ward off the legally prescribed punishment of Qadhf (false accusation of adultery).
In this Hadīth, the great Tābi‘i Sa‘īd ibn Jubayr tells us that he was asked about the ruling of the two involved in Li‘ān - when a husband accuses his wife of adultery and denies the attribution of her child to himself and the woman negates this, they are required to practice Li‘ān (oath of condemnation) - should they be separated? He did not know what to say and was not aware of the ruling in this regard, and this was during the governance of Mus‘ab ibn az-Zubayr, who was the ruler of Iraq. Mus‘ab did not separate the spouses who practiced Li‘ān, as clarified in another version of Muslim.
Sa‘īd said: "So, I went to the house of Ibn ‘Umar in Makkah" showing that it was a different house than that in Madīnah. It seems that it was the house of Ibn ‘Umar where he stayed when going to Makkah for Hajj or ‘Umrah, and it seems also that Sa‘īd traveled from Kūfah to Makkah. On reaching the house of Ibn ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him and his father), he asked the boy, Ibn ‘Umar's servant, to seek permission for him to enter. The servant informed him that Ibn ‘Umar was taking a nap, it was noontime and midday. Ibn ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him and his father) heard the voice of Ibn Jubayr and recognized him and asked: Is this Ibn Jubayr who is asking for permission? Ibn Jubayr replied: Yes, I am Sa‘īd ibn Jubayr. So, he permitted him to enter and said: "By Allah, you have not come at this time except for a need." This signifies the understanding and modesty of Ibn ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him and his father) and how he did not make things difficult for whoever needed him during his rest, knowing that the one who would come to him during his rest had only come for a necessity; hence, he should not be upset with him; rather, he should receive him with a cheerful face. Ibn Jubayr entered upon Ibn ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him and his father) and found him lying on a "saddlecloth," a cloth laid on an animal's back under the saddle, and he was resting his head on a pillow, which is a cushion, and it was filled with fiber, i.e., tree or palm cortex.
Then, Sa‘īd ibn Jubayr said: "O Abu ‘Abdur-Rahmān," which is the nickname of ‘Abdullah ibn ‘Umar, and he asked him: Should the two involved in a case of Li‘ān be separated? Ibn ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him and his father) said: "Glory be to Allah! Yes." Ibn ‘Umar glorified Allah to express his surprise that Sa‘īd ibn Jubayr was unaware of this famous ruling. Ibn ‘Umar then said: "The first one who asked about this," i.e., the first one who asked the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) about what you asked me about "was so-and-so the son of so-and-so," who was ‘Uwaymir al-‘Ajlāni as mentioned in another version in Sahīh Muslim Collection: "The Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) separated between the two members of Banu al-‘Ajlān." He asked: O Messenger of Allah, tell me about the ruling of one who found his wife committing adultery; what should he do in such a situation? If he spoke about what he had seen, "his statement would be a horrible matter" that people would find disgusting. It would be Qadhf (false accusation of adultery) that entails flogging as a legally prescribed punishment in case he brought no evidence. "And if he were to remain silent" and did not speak about what he had seen, his silence about the matter would also be horrible and an unbearable feeling of anger. Ibn ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him and his father) reported that the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) remained silent and did not answer the man's question, waiting for the revelation and considering this a serious issue. The Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) would hate questions about things that did not occur. This man who asked the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) came back after some time and said: O Messenger of Allah, "I have been afflicted by" the matter I had asked you about, i.e., I have been afflicted and tested in this regard, as I saw my wife committing adultery. Thereupon, Allah Almighty revealed verses of Surat an-Nūr: {As for those who accuse their wives [of adultery] but have no witnesses except themselves, then the evidence of one of them is to testify four times by Allah that he is telling the truth, and the fifth [oath] is that may Allah curse him if he is telling a lie. But she will be spared the punishment if she testifies four times by Allah that he is telling a lie, and the fifth [oath] is that may Allah’s wrath be upon her if he is telling the truth.} [Surat an-Nūr: 6-9] This means: That Men who accuse their wives without having witnesses besides their own selves to testify to the truthfulness of their accusation, each of them should testify four times by Allah: that he is telling the truth about accusing his wife of adultery, then, in the fifth testimony, he should add the supplication against himself of being worthy of curse if he was lying about his accusation, which makes her subject to the legal prescribed punishment of adultery. What spares her this punishment is to testify four times by Allah that he is lying about accusing her, then, in her fifth testimony, she should add the supplication against herself of being liable to Allah's wrath if he was telling the truth about what he accuses her of.
The Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) recited these verses to the man and admonished him in the hope that he might take back his accusation "and reminded him" to repent, telling him that the worldly punishment - which is the legally prescribed punishment of Qadhf - is less severe and much easier than the punishment of the Hereafter. However, the man said: "No" I shall not take back what I said because it is true, and he swore, saying: By the One Who sent you with the truth, I did not lie about her by accusing her of adultery and immorality. Then, the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) called the woman and admonished her to repent in case she had sinned. He reminded and informed her that the worldly punishment - which is the prescribed punishment of adultery, i.e., being stoned - is less severe and much easier than the punishment of the Hereafter. However, the woman swore that her husband was lying in his claim against her. Thereupon, the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) commanded both of them to swear the oath of condemnation. The Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) started with the man since Allah Almighty started with him in the verse. The man swore four times by Allah that he was telling the truth about what he accused her of, and in the fifth testimony, he invoked the curse upon himself if he was a liar. Then, it was the woman's turn. So, she swore four times by Allah that her husband was lying about his claim against her by accusing her of adultery and immorality, and in the fifth, she supplicated against herself invoking Allah's wrath upon her if her husband was truthful in what he said. So, none of them admitted the truthfulness of the other. Hence, the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) separated between them. One of the rulings of Li‘ān is that if each of the spouses insists on what he said, then, they should not be united after Li‘ān and their marriage is invalidated.
The Hadīth clarifies the ruling of Li‘ān and its manner.
It points out how the sinner should be admonished and reminded of repentance..

1495
‘Abdullah reported: It was Friday night, and we were in the mosque when a man from the Ansār (supporters) came and said: If a man found another man with his wife and he speaks about it, you will flog him; or if he kills, you will kill him; and if he remains silent, he will remain silent in anger. By Allah, I will surely ask the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) about it. On the next day, he came to the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) and asked him saying: If a man found another man with his wife and he speaks about it, you will flog him; or if he kills, you will kill him; or if he remains silent, he will remain silent in anger. He said: O Allah, judge; and he kept supplicating, so the verse of Li‘ān (oath of condemnation) was revealed: {As for those who accuse their wives [of adultery] but have no witnesses except themselves} [Surat an-Nūr: 6], these verses. This man, of all people, was afflicted with this. So, he came with his wife to the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) and swore the oath of condemnation. The man testified four times by Allah that he was from the truthful, then, the fifth time he invoked a curse that Allah's curse be upon him if he was from the liars. She went to invoke a curse, but the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) said to her: Stop. However, she refused and invoked a curse. After they had both left, he said: Perhaps she will give birth to a curly-haired black child, and she gave birth to a curly-haired black child..

Commentary : The Shariah has clarified the rulings of marriage between the man and the woman and has explained the rulings of the husband's accusation of his wife for committing adultery without evidence and the consequent practice of Li‘ān, besides other rulings of separation, to protect lineages, repel shame from the spouses, and ward off the legally prescribed punishment of Qadhf (false accusation of adultery).
In this Hadīth, ‘Abdullah ibn Mas‘ūd (may Allah be pleased with him) narrates that they were in the Prophet's mosque on Friday night when a man from the Ansār - the people of Madīnah - came. It was Hilāl ibn ’Umayyah, and it is said: ‘Uwaymir al-‘Ajlāni. He said: "If a man found another man with his wife," i.e., he saw her committing adultery with him. If "he speaks" about it, "you will flog him" inflicting on him the legally prescribed punishment of Qadhf for having no witnesses, and if "he kills" the adulterer, "you will kill him" by way of legal retribution. "And if he remains silent" and does nothing, "he will remain silent in anger," i.e., anger and hatred for her. It seems that the man's speech was before the revelation of the verses of Li‘ān and it also seems that it was a mere question posed by that man at that time, not a real incident that had already occurred. The Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) used to hate such questions as mentioned in the Hadīth of Sahl ibn Sa‘d in the two Sahīh Collections.
Then, this man swore to ask the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) about this matter. On the next day - the next morning - the man went to the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) asking about what was previously mentioned. Thereupon, the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) supplicated: "O Allah, judge," i.e., clarify to us the ruling in this regard, and he continued supplicating Allah Almighty to clarify this incident, so, the verses of Li‘ān were revealed. These are the verses in which Allah Almighty says: {As for those who accuse their wives [of adultery] but have no witnesses except themselves, then the evidence of one of them is to testify four times by Allah that he is telling the truth, and the fifth [oath] is that may Allah curse him if he is telling a lie. But she will be spared the punishment if she testifies four times by Allah that he is telling a lie, and the fifth [oath] is that may Allah’s wrath be upon her if he is telling the truth.} [Surat an-Nūr: 6-9] This means: Men who accuse their wives without having witnesses besides their own selves to testify to the truthfulness of their accusation, each of them should swear four times by Allah that he is telling the truth about accusing his wife of adultery. Then, in the fifth testimony, he should add the supplication against himself of being worthy of condemnation if he is lying about his accusation, which makes her subject to the legally prescribed punishment of adultery. What spares her of this punishment is to testify four times by Allah that he is lying about accusing her. Then, in her fifth testimony, she should add the supplication against herself of being liable for Allah's wrath if he is telling the truth about what he accuses her of.
Among all people, this man was afflicted by the occurrence of what he asked about to his wife. So, he accompanied his wife to the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him). They both swore the oath of condemnation, i.e., the man testified four times by Allah that he was telling the truth, and then, the fifth time, he invoked the curse of Allah upon himself if he was lying. This is because testimony in an adultery case is not complete except with four witnesses, but this case was witnessed by none except the husband; hence, he was assigned four testimonies so that each oath would replace a witness, as an oath could sometimes replace a witness like when someone is entitled to some right but has one witness only. In this case, the Shariah considers his oath in place of the witness. After completing the four testimonies that replace the four witnesses, nothing is left after the testimony of the four witnesses in adultery against the married person, as in this case, except stoning, which is death. There is nothing left after taking the oath of condemnation four times except the curse of Allah Almighty or His wrath, which also indicates death (ruin). The woman, then, went to swear the oath of condemnation, but the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) said to her: "Stop," a word meant here to deter her, i.e., refrain and take your time. However, she refused to stop or be dissuaded from completing Li‘ān. Hence, she took her part in Li‘ān. When the two parties swore the oath of condemnation and went away after finishing their testimonies, the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) said: "Perhaps she will give birth to" the baby in her womb, and he will be "a curly-haired black child," i.e., not straight-haired, which was the description of the one she was accused of committing adultery with. It is as if the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) most likely believed that she was lying, and the child she gave birth to was just as the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) had described.
The Hadīth clarifies that the ruling of Li‘ān, in principle, is to take place between the man and his wife if he accuses her of adultery and has no witness but himself.
It also points out that things must be judged according to what is apparent, whereas Allah Almighty is the One Who judges the intentions.
It explains how Li‘an must take place in the presence of the Imam or the judge and in the presence of an assembly of people.
It shows the condition that makes Li‘ān obligatory, which is the woman's denial of committing adultery because if she admits it, Li‘ān becomes impermissible and she becomes subject to the legally prescribed punishment.
It also signifies that it is Sunnah for the ruler to admonish the two persons involved in Li‘ān when intending to swear the oath of condemnation, which becomes confirmed after the fifth time..

1496
Muhammad ibn Sīrīn reported: I asked Anas ibn Mālik, knowing that he had knowledge of that, and he said: Hilāl ibn ’Umayyah accused his wife of committing adultery with Sharīk ibn Sahmā’, the brother of Al-Barā’ ibn Mālik from his mother's side. He was the first man who practiced Li‘ān (oath of condemnation) in Islam. He swore oaths of Li‘ān against his wife, so the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) said: "Watch her, if she gives birth to a white-complexioned child having straight hair and sore eyes, he is the son of Hilāl ibn ’Umayyah, but if she gives birth to a child with dark eyelids, curly hair, and thin shanks, then he is the son of Sharīk ibn Sahmā’." He (the narrator) said: I was informed that she gave birth to a child with dark eyelids, curly hair, and thin shanks..

Commentary : The Shariah has clarified the rulings of marriage between the man and the woman and has explained the rulings of the husband's accusation of his wife for committing adultery without evidence, and the consequent practice of Li‘ān, besides other rulings of separation, to protect lineages, repel guilt from the spouses, and ward off the legal prescribed punishment of Qadhf (false accusation of adultery).
In this Hadīth, the Tābi‘i Muhammad ibn Sīrīn narrates that he asked Anas ibn Mālik (may Allah be pleased with him) about an issue, thinking that he had knowledge of it, namely the issue of Li‘ān that occurs between spouses when the husband accuses his wife of adultery without having witnesses as evidence. Anas ibn Mālik (may Allah be pleased with him) informed him that Hilāl ibn ’Umayyah al-Wāqifi (may Allah be pleased with him) - one of the three who stayed behind and Allah accepted their repentance after the Battle of Tabūk - accused his wife of committing adultery with a man called Sharīk ibn Sahmā’, who was the brother of Al-Barā’ ibn Mālik, and Al-Barā’ was the brother of Anas ibn Mālik from his father.
Hilāl ibn ’Umayyah (may Allah be pleased with him) was the first man to practice Li‘ān in Islam. Li‘ān: It is when a man takes an oath four times that he is truthful about accusing his wife of adultery, and on the fifth time he swears that may Allah curse him if he is lying. Then, the woman proceeds and takes an oath four times that her husband is lying, and on the fifth time she swears that may Allah's wrath be upon her if he is telling the truth. Li‘ān took place between both of them and after they were gone, the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) said: "Watch her," i.e., look at the baby's features so we may know which of them is lying, as she got pregnant during that period. If the child is "a white-complexioned child having straight hair," i.e., has flowing hair and "sore eyes," i.e., his eyes are sore because of tears, redness, or any other reason, "then he is the son of Hilāl ibn ’Umayyah," i.e., his father is Hilāl because these are his features. "But if she gives birth to a child with dark eyelids," i.e., with black eyelids, "curly hair," i.e., with hair that is curved and twisted, and "thin shanks," i.e., with tiny and thin legs, then his father is Sharīk ibn Sahmā’. Anas (may Allah be pleased with him) reported that he was informed that the child resembled Sharīk ibn Sahmā’ whom she was accused of committing adultery with.
The Hadīth points out that the ruling of Li‘ān, in principle, is to take place between the man and his wife if he accuses her of adultery without having a witness but himself.
It also clarifies that Li‘ān should take place in the presence of the Imam or the judge and in the presence of an assembly of people..

1498
Abu Hurayrah reported: Sa‘d ibn ‘Ubādah al-Ansāri said: O Messenger of Allah, what if a man finds his wife with another man? Should he kill him? The Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) said: No. Sa‘d said: Yes, by the One Who honored you with the truth. Thereupon, the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) said: Listen to what your master is saying!.

Commentary : The Shariah has clarified the rulings of marriage between the man and the woman and has explained the rulings of the husband's accusation of his wife for committing adultery without evidence and the consequent practice of Li‘ān, besides other rulings of separation, to protect lineages, repel shame from the spouses, ward off the legally prescribed punishment of Qadhf (false accusation of adultery), and prevent strife and bloodshed.
In this Hadīth, Abu Hurayrah (may Allah be pleased with him) reports that Sa‘d ibn ‘Ubādah al-Ansāri (may Allah be pleased with him) came to the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) when the following verse was revealed: {As for those who accuse chaste women [of adultery] but fail to produce four witnesses.} [Surat an-Nūr: 4], as mentioned in Musnad Ahmad Collection from the Hadīth of ‘Abdullah ibn ‘Abbās (may Allah be pleased with him and his father), and he said: "O Messenger of Allah, what if," i.e., tell me and inform me what is the ruling? "A man finds his wife with another man, should he kill him?" That is to say, and the killer would, thus, be killed by way of legal retribution, or should he go bring four witnesses and he would, thus, escape after fulfilling his need? The Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) said: "No," i.e., he should not be killed; rather, witnesses should be brought, and the legally prescribed punishment should be inflicted on him; otherwise, the one who is drunk, angry, or jealous would dare to kill then claim that his wife was committing adultery and chaos would, thus, prevail. Sa‘d said: "Yes" and he swore to the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) by the God Who honored and privileged him by sending him with the truth and the Shariah that whoever sees this happening to his wife will be overcome by anger and jealousy and will, thus, strike him with the sword. This was not meant as an objection to the Prophet's words; rather, it was said out of jealousy and seeking the concession to kill the adulterer when caught red-handed. Thereupon, the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) said in wonder: "Listen to what your master is saying!" Master: the chief and leader, as Sa‘d was the master of the Khazraj from the Ansār. This means: Look at his jealousy! The end of Muslim's version reads: "Indeed, he is jealous, and I am more jealous than he is, and Allah is more jealous than I am," i.e., the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) lauded Sa‘d's feeling of jealousy and clarified that it is from the attributes of the honorable and the eminent. The explanation of the jealousy of Allah Almighty was mentioned in the two Sahīh Collections: "The jealousy of Allah is when the believer commits what Allah has prohibited."
Despite the great significance of this matter - a man seeing his wife with a strange man - and its gravity, a Muslim is required to abide by the commands of Allah Almighty and His prohibitions, even if they contradict his opinion and personal desires. Had this matter been left to the likes of what Sa‘d had said, the consequent evil would have been much graver and it would have paved the way for false accusations and other evil consequences.
The Hadīth shows that jealousy and chivalry must not prevent one from carrying out Allah's commands and executing His prescribed punishments.
It points out the necessity of having witnesses in adultery cases..

1502
Abu Hurayrah reported that the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) said about the slave whose ownership is shared between two men and one of them emancipates him, he said: He should guarantee..

Commentary : The Shariah has protected all rights including the partners' rights. It has forbidden any kind of offense practiced by one partner against the other. This Hadīth clarifies that when two people own a slave jointly and one of them emancipates his share of that slave, this entails emancipating the rest of the slave. When the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) said: "He should guarantee," it meant that the emancipator should guarantee his partner's share of the slave whom he emancipated, i.e., he is financially responsible for securing the complete freedom of that slave. In the Two Sahīh Collections: "But if he has no money, the slave will be required to work to pay for his freedom, but must not be overburdened." So, it made it clear that if the emancipator is poor and has no money to free the rest of the slave, he remains in slavery and is required to work for his freedom and to pay for the share of the partner who did not emancipate him. However, he should not be assigned tasks that are hard for him or beyond his ability..