| 2 Hadiths


Hadith
3101
Safiyyah(may Allah be pleased with her), the wife of the Prophet ﷺ, narrated that she came to visit Allah's Messenger ﷺ while he was in I‘tikaaf (i.e., spiritual retreat in the mosque to devote oneself exclusively to worship Allah during the last ten days of Ramadan). When she got up to return, Allah's Messenger ﷺgot up with her and accompanied her, and when he reached near the gate of the mosque close to the door (of the house) of Umm Salamah, the wife of the Prophet, two men from the Ansaar passed by them and greeted Allah's Messenger ﷺ and then went away. Allah's Messenger ﷺ addressed them saying, "Do not hurry! (She is my wife)."  They said, "Glorified be Allah! O Allah's Messenger ﷺ (You are far away from any suspicion)," and his saying was hard on them. Allah's Messenger ﷺ said, "Satan circulates in the mind of a person as blood does (in his body). I was afraid that Satan might put some (evil) thoughts in your minds."
.

Commentary :
Satan has always been the sworn enemy of human beings since the beginning of history. He entices and whispers to them to accuse others without evidence, and that is why the Prophet ﷺ used to warn his Companions (may Allah be pleased with them) against the (gravity of) satanic whisperings.
In this hadeeth, the Mother of the Believers, Safiyyah(may Allah be pleased with her)narrated that she came to visit Allah's Messenger ﷺ while he was observing I‘tikaaf (i.e., a retreat in the mosque to devote oneself exclusively to worship Allah) in the mosque during the last ten days of Ramadan. When she (may Allah be pleased with her) got up to return home, Allah's Messenger ﷺ got up with her and escorted her. When he ﷺ reached near the gate of the mosque close to the door (of the house) of Umm Salamah, the wife of the Prophet ﷺ, two men from the Ansaar passed by them and greeted Allah's Messenger ﷺ and then went away in a hurry, out of respect for the Prophet ﷺ when they (may Allah be pleased with them) saw him standing with one of his wives. The wording of the hadeeth suggests that they did not know that she was his wife. Allah's Messenger ﷺ addressed them saying, "Do not hurry! (She is my wife)."  They said, "Glorified be Allah! O Allah's Messenger ﷺ;” you are far above any suspicion. They were astonished by his saying, and it was hard on them that the Prophet ﷺ thought that they would even think ill of him! Allah's Messenger ﷺ said, "Satan circulates in the mind of a person as blood does (in his body). I was afraid that Satan might put some (evil) thoughts in your minds." He ﷺ informed them that he ﷺ feared that Satan should whisper to them and implant evil thoughts in their heads, driving them to think ill of the Prophet ﷺ, and this would have incurred their ruin. Therefore, he ﷺ hastened to inform them of the reality, edifying them and the following Muslim generations on the right thing to do, should any of them be in a similar situation.
The hadeeth underlines the permissibility of visiting a person observing I‘tikaaf in his place of seclusion.
It is inferred therefrom that one should eliminate all doubts and means that could lead others to think ill of him, by unveiling the truth to people at the proper time..

3104
Narrated `Abdullah: The Prophetﷺstood up and delivered a sermon and pointing to the house of `Aaishah (may Allah be pleased with her) (i.e. eastwards), he said thrice, "Affliction (will appear from) here," and "from where the horn of Satan comes out (i.e. from the East).
.

Commentary : The Prophet ﷺ would warn his nation of evil and tribulations and clarify to them some of their aspects so that the Muslims would be informed and able to avoid failing in those tribulations.

In this hadeeth, ‘Abdullah ibn ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him) reports that the Prophet ﷺ delivered a sermon one day, during which he ﷺ pointed eastwards – towards the direction of the lands of Persia and beyond or the lands of Najd, Rabee’ah and Mudar, as all of them are situated eastward of al-Madeenah. He ﷺ informed the Companions (may Allah be pleased with them) that tribulations would emerge from these lands, and he repeated his warning three times to emphasise it and ensure everyone could hear him.

His statement “from where the horn of Satan comes out” means that thence will be the base of his followers and supporters or dominion and strength. The False Messiah, the greatest affliction and tribulation that will befall humanity, will come out from the direction of these lands. It is said that the hadeeth refers to great tribulations and wars that afterwards emerged from Iraq like the Battle of the Camel, the battles of Siffeen and Harooraa, the afflictions of Banoo Umayyah and the khawaarij. All of those events emerged fromIraq and eastwards of Najd. It is reported on the authority of Ibn ‘Abbaas (may Allah be pleased with him): The Prophet ﷺ said, "Oh Allah, bless us in our Syria; O Allah, bless us in our Yemen." Those present said: "And in our Najd, O Messenger of Allah!" But he ﷺsaid, "O Allah, bless us in our Syria; O Allah, bless us in our Saa' and Mudd (measures representing food). O Allah bless us in our Shaam and Yemen." Those present said, "And in our Najd, O Messenger of Allah!" He ﷺ said, "There shall arise the horn of Satan, tribulations will emerge from there,andrepulsion is in the east." [ Reported by al-Tabaraanee].

The Prophet ﷺ in this hadeeth foretells some of the events that will take place in the future, which are considered from the unseen. The hadeeth serves as a warning against tribulations..

3107
Narrated `Isaa ibn Tahmaan: Anas (may Allah be pleased with him) brought out to us two worn-out footwear without hair and with pieces of straps. Later, Thaabit Al-Banaanee told me that Anas said that they were the shoes of the Prophet ﷺ.
.

Commentary : The Prophet ﷺ was ascetic in his life and totally detached from its pleasures, despite all the spoils and wealth Allah had granted him, as he was focused only on the Hereafter. He ﷺ set for us a great example in abstaining from worldly pleasures and sufficing with the minimum.

In this hadeeth, the Taab’iee ‘Isaa ibn Tahmaan reports that Anas ibn Maalik (may Allah be pleased with him) kept two old items of footwear (Arabic Na’l),i.e. a slingback that often does not cover the entire foot from above. One day, Anas showed them to people, and they were so old that the hair on them was worn out. They had front straps used to tighten the footwear to the foot. It was Thaabit al-Bunaanee who informed ‘Issaa ibn Tahmaan that they were the shoes of the Prophet ﷺ as he heard it directly from Anas – who was the servant of the Prophet ﷺ for ten years.

The hadeeth shows how the Companions (may Allah be pleased with them) were so keen on keeping the items of the Prophet ﷺ and would utilise them to teach people..

3108
Narrated Aboo Burdah:`Aaishah (may Allah be pleased with her) brought out to us a patched garment, and she said, "The soul of Allah's Messengerﷺwas taken away while he was wearing this."
According to the hadeeth from the way of Sulaymaan from Humayd, Aboo Burdah added, "Aaishah (may Allah be pleased with her)brought out to us a thick waist sheet like the ones made by the Yemenites, and also a garment of the type called Al- Mulabbadah."
.

Commentary : The Prophet ﷺ was ascetic in his life and totally detached from its pleasures, despite all the spoils and wealth Allah had granted him, as he was focused only on the Hereafter. He ﷺ set for us a great example in abstaining from worldly pleasures and sufficing with the minimum.

In this hadeeth, Aboo Burdah ibn Aboo Moosa al-Ash’aree reports that ‘Aaishah (may Allah be pleased with her), the Mother of the Believers, brought out a Kisaa Mulabbad i.e. a patched garment or a patched thick sheet. It is said that it is a garment that becomes thick from the middle, and it appearsthe term is only used in reference to garments made of wool. She (may Allah be pleased with her) told them that the Prophet ﷺ was wearing it at the time his blessed soul departed his noble body. The Prophet ﷺ used to wear with this garment a thick waist sheet made in Yemen to cover his private body parts and lower half. The reason the Prophet ﷺ wore these types of garments could be due to his humility and intent to abstain from living a soft life. It is possible that he ﷺ did it without intending it, since he would wear whatever was available for him.

The hadeeth shows how the Companions (may Allah be pleased with them) were so keen on keeping the relics of the Prophet ﷺ and benefitting from them in educating people. .

3110
Narrated `Alee ibn Al-Husayn: “When they reached Al-Madeenah after returning from Yazeed ibn Mu'aawaiyah after the martyrdom of al-Husayn ibn `Alee (may Allah bestow His Mercy upon him), Al-Miswar ibn Makhramah met him and said to him, "Do you have any need you may order me to satisfy?" `Alee said, "No." Al-Miswar said, Will you give me the sword of Allah's Messengerﷺfor I am afraid that people may take it from you by force? By Allah, if you give it to me, they will never be able to take it till I die." When `Alee ibn Aboo Taalib asked for the hand of the daughter of Aboo Jahal to be his wife besides Faatimah (may Allah be pleased with her), I heard Allah's Messengerﷺon his pulpit delivering a sermon in this connection before the people, and I had then attained my age of puberty. Allah's Messengerﷺsaid, "Faatimah is from me, and I am afraid she will be subjected to trials in her religion." The Prophetﷺthen mentioned one of his sons-in-law who was from the tribe of Banee ‘Abd Shams, and he praised him as a good son-in-law, saying, "Whatever he said was the truth, and he promised me and fulfilled his promise. I do not make that which is lawful forbidden, nor do I make that which is forbidden lawful, but by Allah, the daughter of Allah's Messengerﷺand the daughter of the enemy of Allah, (i.e. Aboo Jahl) can never get together.”.

Commentary : The Prophet ﷺ loved his daughter Faatimah (may Allah be pleased with her)ardently and wholeheartedly such that anything that would harm her was as if it harmed him personally.

In this hadeeth, ‘Alee ibn al-Husayn ibn ‘Alee, alias Zayn al-‘Aaabideen (may Allah be pleased with him), reports that after the martyrdom of al-Husayn ibn `Alee (may Allah be pleased with him), whose death was on the 10th of Muharram in the year 61 of Hijrah, he travelled along with members from the family of the Prophet ﷺ from Damascus –where Yazeed ibn Mu'aawaiyah was based – to al-Madeenah. There, al-Miswar ibn Muhramah embraced and welcomed ‘Alee ibn al-Husayn (may Allah be pleased with him) and asked him if there was anything that he needed so that he could fulfil it for him. ‘Alee ibn al-Husayn (may Allah be pleased with him) advised him that there was nothing that he needed. Then, he asked him to entrust him with the sword of the Prophet ﷺ to keep it safe for him, because he feared that others who did not know the true value of this sword would overpower him and take the sword from him by force. He swore to ‘Alee that if he kept the sword with him, neither Yazeed nor his supporters would be able to reach it except over his dead body.It is said that this sword could be the famous sword Thoo al-Faqaar.

The reason Miswar proposed to keep the swordwas only to protect it for ‘Alee ibn al-Husayn because at that time he was youngi.e.he feared people would overpower him and take it from him forcefully. His intent was to protect the sword of the Prophet ﷺ and keep it in safety for ‘Alee ibn al-Husayn (may Allah be pleased with him). It is said that he swore by Allah that hewould be able to protect it out of his confidence and trust in Allah that He would enable him to duly fulfil his promise.

Then, al-Miswar relates that ‘Alee ibn Abee Taalib (may Allah be pleased with him) asked for the hand of the daughter of Aboo Jahal to be his wife to have her as a co-wife with Faatimah (may Allah be pleased with her). After the news reached the Prophet ﷺ, he delivered a sermon on his pulpit in which he said that Faatimah was a part of him, and that he feared she would be subjected to trials in her religion because of jealousy. Then, he ﷺ mentioned one of his sons-in-law who was from the tribe of Banee ‘Abd Shams i.e. Al-‘Aas ibn al-Rabee’ ibn ‘Ad ‘Uzza ibn ‘Abd Shams who was the husband of his daughter Zaynab (may Allah be pleased with her) before Islam.He ﷺ praised him as a good son-in-law, saying, "Whatever he said was the truth, and he promised me and fulfilled his promise,” as he promised to send Zaynab to the Prophet ﷺ and he kept his promise. The Prophet ﷺ then added,“I do not make that which is lawful forbidden, nor do I make that which is forbidden lawful, but by Allah, the daughter of Allah's Messengerﷺand the daughter of the enemy of Allah, (i.e. Aboo Jahl) can never get together (as the wives of one man)” i.e. I do not say a word that contravenes the law of Allah but proceeding with this marriage proposal harms me (and yet I do not say that such marriage is unlawful). It is said that he ﷺ was referring to havingthe daughter of Aboo Jahl as a co-wife with Faatimah, which is to indicate that marrying the daughter of Aboo Jahl is lawful, but he disapproved his marriage to her because that would hurt the feelings of and harm Faatimah (may Allah be pleased with her), and the Prophet ﷺ mentioned that whatever harmed her harmed him. The Prophet ﷺpreserved his rank and the rank of his daughter by not allowing the daughter of the enemy of Allah to be her co-wife. He ﷺ even swore by Allah with confidence that the daughter of Allah's Messengerﷺand the daughter of the enemy of Allah, (i.e. Aboo Jahl) can never get together as the wives of one man. As such, this has become one of the forbidden marriages i.e. having the daughter of Allah's Messengerﷺand the daughter of the enemy of Allah (i.e. Aboo Jahl) as co-wives.

It is said that al-Miswar related the story of ‘Alee (may Allah be pleased with him) with the daughter of Aboo Jahl after requesting the sword for many reasons. One of which is that he wanted to say that as the Prophet ﷺ loved Faatimah (may Allah be pleased with her) so much, it is obligatory upon every believer to love her offspring.As the Prophet ﷺ was so considerate of her,gave importance toher feelings and wanted to ensure her happiness, he thuswanted to do the same, and ensure that which was in the best interestsof her grandson. Hence, he should be entrusted with the sword, as he would do all he could to serve ‘Alee ibn al-Husayn’s best interests.Another reason for narrating the story was to show that as the Prophet ﷺ swore by Allah while being confident that He would enable for his oath to be fulfilled, al-Miswar swore by Allah that he would protect the sword while being confident that Allah would enable him to protect it.

The hadeeth shows that it is forbidden to harm the Prophet ﷺ in any form and by any means. It shows the keen interest of the Companions to keep the items of the Prophet ﷺ and utilize them to teach and educate people. .

3111
Narrated Ibn Al-Hanafiyyah: If `Alee had spoken anything bad about `Uthmaan, then he would have mentioned the day when some persons came to him and complained about the Zakat officials of `Uthmaan. `Alee then said to me, "Go to `Uthmaan and say to him, 'This document contains the regulations of spending the alms of Allah's Messenger so order your Zakat officials to act according to it." I took the document to `Uthmaan, who said, "Take it away, for we are not in need of it." I returned to `Alee with it and informed him of that. He said, "Put it back in theplace from where you took it."
.

Commentary : This hadeeth clarifies the lofty mannerisms and good conduct of the Companions (may Allah be pleased with them) and their endeavours to avoid abusing each other or discussing things that would violate the honour of others.The reason for narrating this hadeeth as mentioned by Ibn Abee Shaybah in his work al-Musannaf is that Muhammad Ibn al-Hanafiyyah, the son of ‘Alee (may Allah be pleased with him) - al-Hanafiyyah was his mother’s name -was sitting with some people,and some of them started defaming ‘Uthmaan ibn Affaan (may Allah be pleased with him).He forbade them from doing that, so they asked him, “Did your father ‘Alee ever curse ‘Uthmaan?” He told them that he never cursed him, and if he had ever cursed or mentioned anything bad about him once, he would have done so on the day when some people came to him complaining about the Zakat collectors of ‘Uthmaan, whowere entrusted with the duty of collecting Zakat from people.‘Alee(may Allah be pleased with him) gave a written note to his son Muhammad and ordered him to go out to ‘Uthmaan (may Allah be pleased with him) and inform him that it contained a statement about the areas of spending the wealth of Zakat, as specified by the Prophet ﷺ; hence he could command the zakat collectors from his workers to act upon what was in it. Muhammad stated: I brought it to ‘Uthmaan, and he said, “Keep it away from us,” meaning, ‘take it away from us; we do not need it.’ This is because he was aware of what was in it.It was also said that he had something similar,which he ordered his workers to act upon. It is also possible that the charges against his Zakat collectors were not fully established before ‘Uthmaan.Alternatively, they may have been established, but political expedience required delaying the reprimand or criticising them regarding desirable acts and not obligatory ones.
When Muhammad returned to his father (may Allah be pleased with him) and told him what ‘Uthmaan(may Allah be pleased with him) had said, he commanded him to put the note back in the place from which he had taken it. He did not say anything more than that and did not say anything bad about ‘Uthmaan(may Allah be pleased with him) because this was the habit of the honourable Companions, that they used to think well of each other.
From the benefits that we can concludefrom this hadeeth isthat we should advise the rulers and clarify what happens from their representatives. It also expounds the virtue of ‘Alee(may Allah be pleased with him)..

3115
Narrated Jaabir ibn `Abdullah Al-Ansaaree: A man amongst us begot a boy whom he named Al-Qaasim. On that the Ansaar said, (to the man), "We will never call you Aboo-al-Qaasim and will never please you with this blessed title." So, he went to the Prophet and said, "O Allah's Messenger ﷺ! I have begotten a boy whom I named Al-Qaasim and the Ansaar said, 'We will never call you Aboo-al-Qaasim, nor will we please you with this title.' " The Prophet ﷺ said, "The Ansaar have done well. Name by my name, but do not name by my Kunya, for I am Qaasim.".

Commentary : Allah guidedthe Ansaar and inspired them to engage in everything that would help, revere and protect the rights of the Prophet ﷺ. One example of that is mentioned in this hadeeth, wherein Jaabir ibn ‘Abdullah(may Allah be pleased with him)reports that a child was born to a man from the Ansaar. He named him al-Qaasim, as he wished hisKunya (teknonym)to be Aboo al-Qaasim.However,the Ansaar objected and told him, “We will not call you Aboo Al-Qaasim” because that is the Kunya of the Prophet ﷺ, and we will not let you take this honour and be given the same teknonym of the Prophet ﷺ. The man went to the Prophet ﷺ and told him what had happened.So,the Prophet ﷺ remarked, “The Ansaar did well,” meaning, in upholding the honour and reverence of the Prophetﷺ, by preventing anyone from sharing his Kunya. Then, he ﷺdirected them to the alternative, saying, “Feel free to name after my name, however, avoid using my Kunya.” In other words, give your sons the name of Muhammad, but avoid using my Kunya (i.e. Aboo al-Qaasim).After, he ﷺ explained the reason and the cause of having his own Kunya: “I am Qaasim (distributor),” meaning: I grant everyone what he deserves, and in the hadeeth of Aboo Hurayrah (may Allah be pleased with him), according to al-Bukhaaree, “I place wealth where I am commanded to place,” i.e. I do not give anyone or withhold from giving anyone except by the permission of Allah; hence, whom I give little, then that is due to the decree of Allah, and whom I give more, then that is also due to the decree of Allah.
As can be noted, the Prophet ﷺ forbade people combining his name and histekonym (Kunya),i.e.Muhammad, Aboo al-Qaasim. It was said: the prohibition is against using his Kunya, irrespective of whether one is called Muhammad or not.And it was said: This prohibition is specific to his time ﷺ.
The hadeethindicates the permissibility of naming children with the names of the prophets, and the prophets and their names are clear of what contains or entails evil..

3117
Aboo Hurayrah(may Allah be pleased with him): Allah's Messengerﷺ said, "Neither do I give you (anything) nor withhold (anything) from you, but I am just a distributor (i.e.Qaasim), and I give as I am ordered."
.

Commentary : The Prophet ﷺreminded the hearts of his Companions of Allah in all their active and inactive states and clarified to them that he did not do anything apart from the command of Allah.As part of that, he explained to them that Allah, the Glorified, is the one who legislated how the wealth of booty and spoils, and other things be distributed, and clarified the places of their distribution.He ﷺused to say when distributing wealth amongst them, “I do not give to you and withhold from you,” which carries the meaning: I do not give anyone amongst you because of my heart being inclined to him, neither do I withhold from giving anyone due to my heart’s disinterest from him, rather, everything is from Allah, the Exalted. In reality, Allah is the Giver and Withholder.I only give you according to what Allah facilitates for me and according to what He has legislated.
His statement, “I am a Qaasim (distributor),” carries the meaning:I distribute amongst you by the command of Allah and place everything in terms of withholding and giving where I have been commanded to.I do not give anyone or withhold from anyone except by the permission of Allah. Hence, whom I gave little, that was by the decree of Allah, and whom I gave more, that was also by the decree of Allah.
From the benefits of this hadeeth is that it establishes the divine decree and predestination, and belief in that and that there is no one to impede what Allah has given, and there is no giver for what Allah withholds. It sends the message thatpeople deal in the wealth rightly and wrongly, depending on their intentions, while the distribution among the people as per the way of the Messenger of Allah ﷺis done by what Allah divinely decided and by His decree and legal command.
This hadeethis a message to every distributor after the Prophet ﷺ to act like the Prophetﷺ such that he distributes the wealth according to the command of Allah, and not according to desires and other interests.
It shows that sustenance and wealth are a trust from Allah, entrusted to the people..

3118
Narrated Khawla Al-Ansaariyyah (may Allah be pleased with her): I heard Allah's Messengerﷺsaying, "Some people spend Allah's wealth in an unjust manner; such people will be put in the Hellfire on the Day of Resurrection."
.

Commentary : Allah, the Sublime, has made wealth a means for the people by which the interests of their religion and worldly livesare fulfilled.One is meant to earn his income from lawful sources and spend it in a lawful manner.
In this hadeeth, the Prophet ﷺ warned the Zakat collectors and other workersagainst managing the wealth of Allah that they are entrusted with wrongfully. This is applicable to all aspects of wealth, including itsaccumulation, earning through forbidden means, and spending it in the wrong places. The attribution of wealth to Allah is intended to refer tothe war spoils and booty and the public treasuries of Muslims, which Allah made for their interests. This warning is addressing the Zakat collectors, as well as the rulers who take from it wrongfully, thus taking more than what they deserve in comparison to their official duties, giving to those who are not deserving, or something else which is deemed wrong.The Prophet ﷺsaid that these people deserve the Fire on the Day of Judgement, unless they repent, thus returning the wrongfully usurped wealth to their rightful owners.His statement, “For them is …” is indicative of swift punishment and its intense closeness to those who wrongfully deal with the [public] wealth.
This hadeeth clarifies that public wealth that is made to serve the public interests of Muslimsis not a grazing ground for those whom Allah has entrusted with leadership over it because they will be held accountable about it on the Day of Judgment.
The hadeeth contains a deterrent to government officials and leaders from taking from the wealth of Allah anything wrongfully or withholding it from its rightful owners..

3121
Narrated Aboo Hurayrah (may Allah be pleased with him): Allah's Messengerﷺsaid, "When Kosrae is ruined, there will be noKosrae after him; and when Caesar is ruined, there will will be no Caesar after him. By Him in Whose Hands my life is, you will spend their treasures in Allah's Cause."
.

Commentary : This hadeeth contains a sign among the signs of the truthfulness of hisﷺ prophethood.The Prophetﷺ informed his Companions that no king wouldassume the leadership of the Persians after the death of Kosrae in Iraq.It has been said that this meant in other lands that were under the control of the Persians.Likewise, he stated that Hercules, the Caesar of Rome during that time, would be the last of the kings of the Romans in the Levant.Kosrae is the title of every king who ruled the Persians, and Caesar is the title of every king that ruled the Romans.What the Prophet ﷺforetoldhad already happened,i.e.the kingdom of Kosrae was torn apart after his death; likewise, the kingdom of Hercules.It went into retreat after his death until Allah granted the Muslims victory over their lands and the Muslims spent their treasures in the path of Allah, just as the Prophet ﷺ promised them, and upon which he ﷺ took an oath.
The context of this hadeeth is that the people of Quraysh used to go to the Levant and Iraq as traders.When they entered Islam, they feared the prevention of these journeys due to their entrance into Islam.In response, the Prophet ﷺmentioned to them this news tocalm them down and console their hearts, as it was a glad tiding to them that those kingdoms would vanish from those two vast territories.
This hadeeth may appear problematic knowing that when Kosrae died, his son became the king and thereafter a group took control, and the same happened with the Caesar. However, the fact that removes this problematic understanding is that both the Kosrae and Caesar ruled over a stable kingdom.When both vanished, their kingdom entered a state of instability and kept on moving towards destruction and extinction, and it was not their equivalents who assumed power.This is the same stating about a sick person that he is dead.It means that he is close to death and his circumstances are leading to it.
Allah encircled the kingdoms of the Persians and Romans after these kingdoms ruled a vast amount of lands before the advent of Islam.When Allah sent his Prophetﷺ with Islam, the words of the Almighty were realised concerning them: {Indeed, the earth belongs to Allah, he causes to inherit it whom He wills of His servants, and the [best] outcome is for the righteous.}[Quran 7: 128]..

3124
Narrated Aboo Hurayrah:The Prophetﷺ said, "One of Allah’sProphets carried out a military expedition.He said to his followers, 'Anyone who has married a woman and wants to consummate the marriage, and has not done so yet, should not accompany me; nor should a man who has built a house but has not completed its roof; nor a man who has sheep or she-camels and is waiting for the birth of their young ones.' So, the prophet carried out the expedition and when he reached that town at the time or nearly at the time of the `Asr prayer, he said to the sun, 'O sun! You are under Allah's Order, and I am under Allah's Order O Allah! Stop it (i.e. the sun) from setting.' It was stopped till Allah made him victorious. Then he collected the booty, and the fire came to burn it, but it did not burn it. He said (to his men), 'Some of you have stolen something from the booty. Let one man from every tribe give me a pledge of allegiance by shaking hands with me.' (They did so and) the hand of a man got stuck over the hand of their prophet. Thereupon, the prophet said (to the man), 'The theft has been committed by your people. So, all the persons of your tribe should give me the pledge of allegiance by shaking hands with me.' The hands of two or three men got stuck over the hand of their prophet and he said, "You have committed the theft.' Then they brought a head of gold like the head of a cow and put it there, and the fire came and consumed the booty. The Prophetﷺadded: Then Allah saw our weakness and disability, so he made booty permissible for us to have."
.

Commentary : Allah, the Sublime, singled out every nation with its own legislations and injunctions and supported every prophet with miracles that were compatible with their era and that enforced their prophethood. He specifically granted the nation of Prophet Muhammad ﷺmany favours in relation to their legislations and injunctions compared to other previous nations.
In this hadeeth, the Prophet ﷺrelates to usthe story of one of the previous prophets. It has been saiditwas Yoosha’ ibn Noon (peace be upon him), as mentioned by al-Haakim in al-Mustadrak.The Prophetﷺ related that this Prophet (peace be upon him) had set out to invade the city of Jericho in Palestine.However, he demanded that three kinds of men not partake in this war:
First,a man who entered a marital contract with a woman and became able to have sexual intercourse with her but did not have intercourse with her yet would mean his heart is most likely attached to her;therefore, his mind would be occupied with his wife and distracted fromfighting and obedience. Additionally, intercourse wouldlessen his strength.
Second,a man who built a house and did not yet put up its roof,i.e. he did not complete the construction of his houseorlive in it yet.
Third,a man who bought pregnant sheep or camels which had not yet given birth.
The apparent reason he excluded them from going out with him to war wasthattheir hearts would have been attached, and their minds occupied thinking of how to complete the unfinished business they had left behind. As such, they could have become distracted from the war.
On their way, they approached the village at the late afternoon (‘Asr) prayer, or close to that time. The fighting was on a Friday, and there remained a remnant of the disbelievers fighting.It was almost sunset, and the nightfall before Saturday was almost entering. Yoosha’ (peace be upon him) feared that they (his soldiers) would lose the morale to fight because it was not permissible for them to fight during Saturdays.So, he addressed the sun and said to it, “You are commanded” to set, whereas “I am commanded” to fight, so he called on Allah Almighty to restrain the sun, so it would not setuntil they had finished fighting.Allah answered his prayer, and it was stopped,i.e. it was returned backwards, or it stopped, or its movement slowed down until Allah helped them to conquer the village.Then he collected the spoils -the wealth obtained by the Muslims after subjugating the disbelievers in battle. At that time, Allah would send the fire to the acquired booty,so that the fire would devour it. However, it did not devour it, as the devouring by fire of the booty and its burning were a sign of acceptance and non-occurrence of embezzlement.After seeing this, their prophet said to them, “There is embezzlement amongst you.” Embezzlement entails taking the spoils wrongfully; it is a betrayal.For the Prophet, peace be upon him, to discover who had embezzled and stolen the spoils, he requested that from each tribe aselected man of them take an oath of allegiance, by greeting him with his hand, so that he would know in which tribe among them the theft had occurred. When they taking the oaths of allegiance, a man’s hand got stuck with his hand, and this was a sign of a betrayal that had occurred from this tribe.He informed him that embezzlement had occurred within this tribe, and thus he told him, “Let your tribe take an oath of allegiance to me,” individually.While they were pledging allegiance to him, the hands of two or three individuals stuck to his, thus he, peace be upon him, remarked, “Embezzlement is found in you,” meaning, ‘You embezzled the booty.’Hence, he demanded that they return what they had taken, “So, they came with a head like the head of a cow made of gold,” which they had taken out of the spoils, “And they placed it” with the rest of the spoils offered for burning. “Thereafter, a fire came and devoured it [the booty]” because now it had become a complete booty that was free of embezzlement, hence, Allah, the Glorified, accepted it.
After completing the story, the Prophet ﷺsaid that Allah Almighty singled out his nation by making lawful for them the spoils; due to their inability and weakness, as a mercy to them, and due to the honour of our Prophet ﷺ, while He, the Glorified, did not make it lawful for anyone else who was before them.People may end up fighting only for the spoils, due to a lack of sincerity, but within this Muslim Nation, there is a prevalence of sincerity.
In the prophetic expression “for us” is glorification, as the Prophet ﷺincluded his honourable soul with those of his nation; while in his saying, “Allah saw our inability and our weakness,” there is an indication of our reality in the sight of Allah as possessing inability and weakness before Him, the Exalted.
Among other benefits of this hadeeth, we can also conclude that the trials of this world call the soul towards panic, love for survival and fear of death..

3129
Narrated `Abdullah ibn Al-Zubayr:When Al-Zubayr got up during the Battle of the Camel, he called me and I stood up beside him, and he said to me, "O my son! Today one will be killed either as an oppressor or as an oppressed one. I see that I will be killed as an oppressed one. My biggest worry is my debts. Do you think, if we pay the debts, there will be something left for us from our money?" Al-Zubayr added, "O my son! Sell our property and pay my debts." Al-Zubayr then willed one-third of his property and willed one-third of that portion to his sons; namely, `Abdullah's sons. He said, "One-third of the one third. If any property is left after the payment of the debts, one-third (of the one-third of what is left) is to be given to your sons." (Hishaam, a sub-narrator added, "Some of the sons of `Abdullah were equal in age to the sons of Al-Zubayr e.g. Khubayb and `Abbaad. `Abdullah had nine sons and nine daughters at that time." (The narrator `Abdullah added:) My father (Al-Zubayr) went on drawing my attention to his debts saying, "If you should fail to pay part of the debts, appeal to my Master to help you." By Allah! I could not understand what he meant till I asked, "O father! Who is your Master?" He replied, "Allah (is my Master)." By Allah, whenever I had any difficulty regarding his debts, I would say, "O Master of Al-Zubayr! Pay his debts on his behalf ." and Allah would (help me to) pay it. Al-Zubayr was martyred leaving no Dinar or Dirham but two pieces of land, one of which was (called) Al-Ghaabah, and eleven houses in Al-Madeenah, two in the city of al-Basrah, one in the city of Koofah and one in Egypt. In fact, the source of the debt which he owed was, that if somebody brought some money to deposit with him. Al-Zubayr would say, "No, (I won't keep it as a trust), but I take it as a debt, for I am afraid it might be lost." Al-Zubayr was never appointed governor or collector of the tax of Kharaaj or any other similar job, but he collected his wealth (from the war booty he gained) during the battles he took part in, in the company of the Prophetﷺ, Aboo Bakr, `Umar, and `Uthmaan(may Allah be pleased with them). (`Abdullah ibn Al-Zubayr added:) When I counted his debt, it turned to be two million and two hundred thousand. (The sub-narrator added:) Hakeem ibn Hizaam met `Abdullah ibn Zubayr and asked, "O my nephew! How much is the debt of my brother?" `Abdullah kept it as a secret and said, "One hundred thousand," Hakeem said, "By Allah! I do not think your property will cover it." On that `Abdullah said to him, "What if it is two million and two hundred thousand?" Hakeem said, "I do not think you can pay it; so if you are unable to pay all of it, I will help you." Az- Zubayr had already bought Al-Ghaabah for one hundred and seventy thousand. `Abdullah sold it for one million and six hundred thousand. Then he called the people saying, "Any person who has any money claim on Al-Zubayr should come to us in Al-Ghaabah." There came to him `Abdullah ibn Ja`far whom Al-Zubayr owed four hundred thousand. He said to `Abdullah ibn Al-Zubayr, "If you wish I will forgive you the debt." `Abdullah (ibn Al-Zubayr) said, "No." Then Ibn Ja`far said, "If you wish you can defer the payment if you should defer the payment of any debt." Ibn Al-Zubayr said, "No." `Abdullah ibn Ja`far said, "Give me a piece of the land." `Abdullah ibn Al-Zubayr said (to him), "Yours is the land extending from this place to this place." So, `Abdullah ibn Al-Zubayr sold some of the property (including the houses) and paid his debt perfectly, retaining four and a half shares from the land (i.e. Al-Ghaabah). He then went to Mu'aawiyyah while `Amr ibn `Uthmaan, Al-Munthir ibn Az- Zubayr and Ibn Zam`ah were sitting with him. Mu'aawiyyah asked, "At what price have you appraised Al- Ghaabah?" He said, "One hundred thousand for each share," Mu’aawiyyah asked, "How many shares have been left?" `Abdullah replied, "Four and a half shares." Al-Munthir ibn Al-Zubayr said, "I would like to buy one share for one hundred thousand." `Amr ibn `Uthmaan said, "I would like to buy one share for one hundred thousand." Ibn Zam`ah said, "I would like to buy one share for one hundred thousand." Mu’aawiyyah said, "How much is left now?" `Abdullah replied, "One share and a half." Mu’aawiyyah said, "I would like to buy it for one hundred and fifty thousand." `Abdullah also sold his part to Mu’aawiyyah six hundred thousand. When Ibn Al-Zubayr had paid all the debts. Al-Zubayr's sons said to him, "Distribute our inheritance among us." He said, "No, by Allah, I will not distribute it among you till I announce in four successive Hajj seasons, 'Would those who have money claims on Al-Zubayr come so that we may pay them their debt." So, he started to announce that in public in every Hajj season, and when four years had elapsed, he distributed the inheritance among the inheritors. Al-Zubayr had four wives, and after the one-third of his property was excluded (according to the will), each of his wives received one million and two hundred thousand. The total amount of his property was fifty million and two hundred thousand..

Commentary : The Companions(may Allah be pleased with them)would always put their trust in Allah as He ought to be relied upon in all aspects of their lives, and this was evident in their submitting of their affairs to Allah Almighty and not fearing poverty.They would take from the world what Allah had decreed for them with a contented soul without squabbling over it, and there was a blessing in their lives.
In this hadeeth, Abdullah ibnAl-Zubayr reports a conversation that occurred between him and his father, when Al-Zubayribn al-’Awwaam(may Allah be pleased with him) took his position during the Battle of the Camel (whichconsisted ofAl-Zubayribn al-’Awwaam and Talhah ibn ‘Ubaydullah(may Allah be pleased with them)and those who were with them on one side, while ‘Alee ibn Abee Taalib (may Allah be pleased with him)and his companions were on the other;it occurred at the gate of Basra 36 years after the murder of ‘Uthmaan (may Allah be pleased with him)).Al-Zubayribn Al-‘Awwaam called his son ‘Abdullahand told him that either an oppressor or an oppressed would be killed that day in battle. He said that because both parties were acting upon their respective interpretations, he told him that he thought he would be killed that day unjustly.Perhaps that was because he did not intend to fight. He wanted to instruct his son to pay off his debts, and he informed him that the greatest of his concern was these debts.He thought that his debts would not leave anything of his wealth. His concern was valid because his debt was solarge that he feared it might not be repaid. For that reason, he asked ‘Abdullah to sell his assets and property andthereby pay off his debts.Then, he bequeathed one-third of his wealth in absolute terms, then a third of one-third to the sons of ‘Abdullah ibnAl-Zubayr specifically.The sons of ‘Abdullah ibn Al-Zubayr were of the same age as the children of Al-Zubayr, buthe singled out Abdullah's children alone because they increased in number.Khubayb and ‘Abbaad were the two sons of ‘Abdullah ibnAl-Zubayr, and there were no other children besides them in those days;at the same time,Al-Zubayr had nine boys and nine girls on the day of his bequest.Al-Zubayr began instructing his son ‘Abdullah to pay off his debts first by saying, “My son, if you should fail to pay part of the debts, appeal to my Master to help you.”‘Abdullah did not know what Al-Zubayr meant by his master, so he asked him, “My dear father! Who is your master?” He replied, “Allah.”This statement emanates from his complete submission to Allah and reliance on Him, and having trust in Him, the Glorified. He was his Master, his Helper, and his Assister in his life and after his death. As such, ‘Abdullah ibnAl-Zubayr swore by Allah that whenever he fell into distress whilst repaying the debts, he sought Allah’s help and said: “O Master of Al-Zubayr, repay for him his debts,” and He would pay off his debts, meaning Allah, in positive response to his supplication.
What Al-Zubayr expected happened.He was killed in this battle, but he died while he had not left behind any dinar or dirham, rather he had left two lands, one of which was al-Ghaabah, a vast area of land in hilly areas of al-Madeenah, eleven houses in al-Madeenah, two houses in al-Basrah, a house in al-Koofah, and a house in Egypt, and these estates were sold to pay off Al-Zubayr's debts.
‘Abdullah ibnAl-Zubayr mentions the cause of his father's debts.He recalled that a man would come to him with his wealth and would give it to him for safe-keeping and as a trust kept with him.But Al-Zubayr would say, “I will not accept it as a deposit; instead, I will take it as a liable loan,”in case he were to lose it, as this would grant more confidence to the owner of the wealth, and better protect the chivalry of Al-Zubayr(may Allah be pleased with him).
Then, ‘Abdullah went on to mention the source of his father's wealth.Al-Zubayr(may Allah be pleased with him) never became a ruler, nor did he collect taxes, or anything that would be a reason for collecting money.He meant by this to explain that the large amount of his wealth was not attained from thosesources concerning which people are perceived negatively. He clarified that most of the wealth that he acquired was from his share in thewar spoils that he gathered after every battle in which accompanied the Prophet ﷺ, or partook with Aboo Bakr, ‘Umar, and ‘Uthmaan, (may Allah be pleased with them). In other words, the source of his wealth was from war spoils and booty, and what the Prophet ﷺ had bestowed upon him.Thus, Allah granted him blessing in his wealth due to its good origin.
Afterward, his son ‘Abdullah counted what he owed of debt and found it to be two thousand multiplied by a thousand and two hundred thousand, meaning: two million and two hundred thousand dirhams. Hakeem ibn Hizaam met ‘Abdullah ibnAl-Zubayr and asked him, “How much debt does your father owe?”He concealed the total amount of the debt from him, and he replied that the debt was one hundred thousand; he did not lie in his words, as it does not negate an excess of the hundred [thousand].He was truthful in some, while he concealed the other amount. It was said: He only said to him: “One hundred thousand” and concealed the rest, lest Hakeem ibn Hizaam would think negativelyabout Al-Zubayr due to the large amount hehad borrowed, or thinkhe lacked firmness, orthat ‘Abdullah would fail to repay the debt. In these ways he could end up perceivingthat he was a person in need. However, Hakeem said, “By Allah, I do not perceive that your wealth will be enough for this debt.”So ‘Abdullah revealed the full amount to him, saying, “Tell me what you think if the debt amountedto two million and two hundred thousand.” When ‘Abdullah saw that Hakeem had perceived the issue of one hundred thousand to be a huge amount, he was compelled to disclose to him of all the debts, and let him know that he was able to repay them. However, Hakeem replied, “I do not see you all being able to repay this amount, so if you cannot handle part of it, then feel free to request assistance from me.”
 ‘Abdullah managed to sell al-Ghaabah for one million and six hundred thousand dirhams. So he proclaimed among the people, “If anyone has a financial right due on Al-Zubayr, then let him come to us at al-Ghaabah.”‘Abdullah ibn Ja’far ibn Abee Taalib(may Allah be pleased with him) came to him as he had lent four hundred thousand to Al-Zubayr, and he said to Abdullah ibn al-Al-Zubayr, “If you wish, I can forsake the claim in support of you out of generosity and grace, so I will not claim back my debt.” ‘Abdullah ibn Al-Zubayr replied, “Do not forsake your debt.” Ibn Ja’far said, “If you wish, you can place it with that amount that you will repay later, if you are going to delay the repayments.”He was suggesting to be placedat the end of the list of people who were due repayment.‘Abdullah replied, “Do not suggest delays.” Ibn Ja’far answered, “In that case, cut for me a portion of the land to repay my debt.”Ibn Al-Zubayr estimated perfectly for him the land, and he sold part of al-Ghaabah and some houses that were not part of al-Ghaabah, and he was able to repay his father’s debt.
He repaid him in full, and there were four and half portions left unsold of al-Ghaabah.Afterwards, ‘Abdullah ibn al-Zubayr came to Mu’aawiyah ibn Abee Sufyaan in Damascus.‘Amr ibn ‘Uthmaan ibn ‘Affaan, his brother al-Munthiribn al-Zubayr ibn al-‘Awwaam, and Ibn Zam’ah were with him.Mu’aawiyah asked, “At how much was al-Ghaabah estimated?”He answered him, “Every portion out of the original sixteen portions was estimated at one hundred thousand.”He asked, “How many portions are left?”He answered, “Four and half portions.”Al-Munthir ibn al-Zubayr said, “I have bought one portion for one hundred thousand.”‘Amr ibn ‘Uthmaan said, “I have taken one portion for one hundred thousand.” Ibn Zam’ah said, “I have bought a portion for one hundred thousand.”Then Mu’aawiyah asked, “Now how much is left?”He answered, “One and half portions.”He said, “I have taken it for one hundred and fifty thousand.”After every creditor had received his financial due, ‘Abdullah ibn Ja’far sold his share to Mu’aawiyah for six hundred thousand, making a profit of two hundred thousand.
Once Ibn al-Zubayr had completed repaying the debts of his father, the children of al-Zubayr told him, “Now, divide between us our inheritance.”However, ‘Abdullah said, “By Allah, I will not distribute the inheritance between you yet, until I proclaim during the Hajj season for four years,“Attention everyone!If anyone is owed by al-Zubayr any money, let him come to us, we will repay his debt.”This does not entail stopping the rightful inheritor from getting his right,which is the distributed portion and the ability to transact in his portion.That is because ‘Abdullah ibn al-Zubayr was a custodian of the estates of al-Zubayr, and he dealt with what was in the interests of paying off the debts first.He assumed that there was a possibility of having remaining debts, whereas distribution to the inheritors only happens after paying off all debts due on the deceased.
The reason he singled out the proclamation for the period of four years is that most likely the distance between Makkah and other distant lands can be travelled during that period in two years, and he intended for the news to reach all parts of the territory and return to him, so he could thereby be assured that he had absolved himself from the responsibility of his father.
He kept on proclaiming every year during the Hajj season, when people from all the corners of the Islamic State assemble, “Attention everyone!Whoever is owed by al-Zubayr anything, please come to us and we will pay off what he is owed.”When four years passed, he distributed the inheritance between them.Al-Zubayr had four wives when he died; they were, Umm Khaalid, al-Rabaab, Zaynab, and ‘Aatikah bint Zayd. ‘Abdullah removed the third portion of the remaining bequeathed wealth which al-Zubayr had bequeathed for the poor people.Every wife got one million two hundred thousand. The total of his remaining wealth was five million and two hundred thousand.
This hadeeth shows that it was among the guidance of the Companions (may Allah be pleased with them) to bequeath at times of war, and to bequeath for the grandsons if there are those inheritors who would legally prevent the inheritance from reaching them.
It also shows that it is permissible to delay the distribution of inheritance until all the debts of the deceased are repaid and his bequests are fully executed.
The hadeeth shows that it is part of the guidance of the Companions(may Allah be pleased with them) for the inheritor as well as the executor [if he wishes] to buy from the left-behind estates if theyare sold.
Italso shows the generosity of ‘Abdullah ibn Ja’far, hence, he was known as the ‘sea of generosity’ and it expounds the virtue and grace of both Ja’far and Hakeem ibn Hizaam.
The hadeeth contains a prohibition from being in debt for the one who cannot repay it or wouldspend it wrongly.
It was part of the guidance of the Companions to proclaim concerning the debts of the one known to have taken loans, and that the proclamation should occur during important seasons, as they are the main assemblies of the people.
The hadeeth motivates and inspires us to have firm trust in and reliance on Allah, the Mighty and Majestic.
It also expounds the blessings of Allah, the Glorified, for the holy warrior and the one striving in His path in his wealth during his lifetime and death..

3134
Narrated Ibn `Umar (may Allah be pleased with him): Allah's Messengerﷺsent a militant mission (Sariyyah)towards Najd - and `Abdullah ibn `Umar was in this expedition. They gained a great number of camels as war booty. The share of each one of them was twelve or eleven camels, and they were given an extra camel each..

Commentary : The spoils of war arecounted and then distributed among the soldiers who have participated in the fight. The person who has the authority to distribute the spoils is the commander of the militaryoperation or the one whom hedelegates for this responsibility.
In this hadeeth, ‘Abdullah ibn ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him) narrates that the Prophet ﷺ sent an expeditiontowards Najd, which is a regionlocated in the middle of the Arabian Peninsula. This expedition is referred to in the hadeeth as Sariyyah, which is a division from the army that consists of no more than four hundred fighters, and ‘Abdullah ibn ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him) was a participant in this one.He reports that they acquired many camels and that the share of each one of them was eleven or twelve camels.The commander of the army gave everyone amongst them their share and granted them an extra camel from the spoils before their division. In a narration in Saheeh Muslim, it reads, “The Messenger of Allah gave us each an extra camel.”This extra share is called in Arabic Anfaal, and they are gifts from the spoils other than the share that is due to be divided so that he gave each one an extra amount above his share.That is because they did well in their fight; giving an additional amount is only for the one who does well in the war.
The reconciliation of the meaning between the two narrations - where in one it says the commander of the expedition was the one who gave them an extra reward from the spoils, and in the other that the Prophet ﷺ was the one who gave them above their allocated share - is that the commander of the expedition gave an extra reward from the spoils, while the Messenger of Allah ﷺ permitted him to so; thus it is allowed to attribute this act to each one of them in that respect.
Frome the benefits of this hadeeth is learning that ifa division from the army acquires spoils during the time it was separated from the army, then the acquired spoils are to be shared with the rest of the army.However, if it encamps in one town while the rest of the army is stationed in a different town, then it exclusively receives the spoils without sharing it with them.
This hadeeth establishesthe legitimacy of giving extra rewards from the spoils in order to motivate the fighters to do well in war..

3135
Narrated Ibn `Umar(may Allah be pleased with him): Allah's Messengerﷺused to give an extra share to some of the members of the Sariyyah he used to send, in addition to the shares they shared with the army in general.
.

Commentary : An-Nafl is the name given to the additional amount the ruler gives to some soldiers above the share of spoils they are entitled to receive, based on obtaining an interest that he perceives.
In this hadeeth, ‘Abdullah ibn ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him) reports that the Prophet ﷺ used to send a Sariyyah – which is a division of the army that does not exceed four hundred in number - and he ﷺ used to give to some of the soldiers of these military units gifts that were exclusive for them, besides the spoils that were distributed to the whole army in general. They would obtain their common share and the specifically rewarded additional share from the Messenger of Allah ﷺ.This was for wisdom and different reasons, such as if a man was particularly offensive against the enemy, or he ascended a fortress and opened it to the Muslims until they overtook it, or he attacked the leader of the enemy’s army and killed him, thus managing thereby to defeat the enemy.The Righteous Caliphs used to do that as well.It was said that he ﷺ used to give the Nafl from the Khums (one-fifth of the entire booty).
This hadeeth shows that it is permissible to take into account the people of power and strength in war and to exclusively allocate them a gift in excess of others..

3136
Narrated Aboo Moosa (may Allah be pleased with him): We got the news of the migration of the Prophetﷺwhile we were in Yemen, so we set out migrating to him. We were, I and my two brothers, I being the youngest, and one of my brothers was Aboo Burdah and the other was Aboo Ruhm. We were over fifty (or fifty-three or fifty -two) men from our people. We got on board a ship which took us to the Negus ofAbyssinia, and there we found Ja`far ibn Abee Taalib and his companions with al-Najaaishee. Ja`far said (to us), "Allah's Messengerﷺhas sent us here and ordered us to stay here, so you too, stay with us." We stayed with him till we all left (Ethiopia) and met the Prophetﷺat the time when he had conquered Khaybar. He gave us a share from its booty (or gave us from its booty). He gave only to those who had taken part in the Battle with him. but he did not give any share to any person who had not participated in Khaybar's conquest except the people of our ship, besides Ja`far and his companions, whom he gave a share as he did them (i.e. the people of the ship).
.

Commentary : The Prophet ﷺ had ordered some of his Companions to migrate to Abyssinia to escape in the interest of their religion and lives from the harm of the polytheists in Makkah. He ﷺ chose Abyssinia as a place to migrate to because its king, the Negus, was a just man, and among those who emigrated to it was Ja’far Ibn Abee Taalib (may Allah be pleased with him).That was before Allah ordered the Muslims to emigrate to al-Madeenah.
In this hadeeth, Aboo Moosaa al-Ash’aree (may Allah be pleased with him) reports that while he was in Yemen, he heard about the mission and migration of the Prophet ﷺ to al-Madeenah. He and others wanted to migrate to him in al-Madeenah, that is, he and his brothers Aboo Ruhm and Aboo Burdah, and with them, there were another fifty-two or fifty-three men from their people who had already reverted to Islam.When they boarded the ship from Yemen to reach Makkah, they were dropped off at Abyssinia, where they met Ja’far ibn Abee Taalib (may Allah be pleased with him) and those who were with him among the Muslim immigrants. They remained with them there until they all came to al-Madeenahafter the conquest of Khaybar in the seventh year of the migration.Khaybar was a town inhabited by Jews at a distance of 153 km from al-Madeenah.I was located to the north on the road to the Levant (al-Shaam).When they came, the Prophet ﷺ allocated for them their shares and gave them a portion of the booty acquired from the conquest of Khaybar. That was after he consulted with the campaigning Muslims concerning them, and they agreed, as the narration of al-Bayhaqee portrays.He did not grant anyone who had not witnessed the invasionanything except the passengers of the ship, namely Ja’far ibn Abee Taalib (may Allah be pleased with him) and those who were with him from among the emigrants from Makkah, and Aboo Moosa al-Ash’aree (may Allah be pleased with him) and those who had emigrated with him from amongst his people to Abyssinia.
This hadeeth expounds the merit and status of the early emigrants - such as Ja'far ibn Abee Taalib and Aboo Moosaa al-Ash'aree and those who were with them –and how they enjoyed two emigrations.
It shows that the ruler has the right to dispose of the wealth gained from the spoils and to exclusively allocate a part of it to the deputies of the Muslims and to those who have lost their wealth, as he ﷺgave to the people of the ship.
Itshows the suffering that the early Muslims endured with the Prophet ﷺ until they managed to convey the call of Allah to the people..

1471
Ibn ‘Umar reported that he divorced his wife during her menstruation in the Prophet's lifetime. So, ‘Umar ibn al-Khattāb asked the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) about that and the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) said: "Order him to take her back and keep her until she attains purity, then menstruates, then attains purity. Then, if he wishes he may keep her, and if he wishes he may divorce her before having intercourse with her. This is the ‘Iddah (waiting period) that Allah Almighty has ordered for the divorce of women." [Another version reads]: That he divorced his wife during her menstruation, once. So, the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) commanded him to take her back and keep her until she attains purity, then menstruates again, while still being with him, then to give her time until she attains purity from her menstruation. After that, if he wanted to divorce her, he could do so when she becomes pure before having sexual intercourse with her, as this is the ‘iddah that Allah commanded for the divorce of women. [Another version reads]: On being asked about this, ‘Abdullah said to someone: "If you divorced your wife once or twice, the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) commanded me to do this. However, if you have divorced her thrice, she became forbidden to you until she is married to another man, and you have disobeyed Allah regarding what He commanded you in divorcing your wife.".

Commentary : The legislated divorce is that one divorces his wife one time while being pure (of her menses) without having sexual intercourse with her during this period of purity. It is called Talāq Sunni (Sunnah-compliant divorce). As for the forbidden divorce, it is to divorce one's wife more than once in one utterance, or to divorce her during her menstruation, or during a period of purity in which he had sexual intercourse with her. This is called Talāq Bid‘i (Heretic divorce).
In this Hadīth, ‘Abdullah ibn ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him and his father) narrates that he divorced his wife - her name was Āminah bint Ghifār, and it was said: Āminah bint ‘Ammār, and there are other opinions as well - during her menstruation before attaining purity, and that was in the Prophet's lifetime. His father, ‘Umar ibn al-Khattāb, went to the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) and asked him about the ruling on this divorce that occurred during menstruation, whether it is permissible or not, and whether it counts or not. The Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) commanded him to order his son, ‘Abdullah, to take her back in marriage and keep her with him "until she attains purity" from the menstruation in which he divorced her, "then menstruates" again, "then attains purity" from the second menstruation. After attaining purity from the second menstruation, he could keep her as his wife if he wished or he could divorce her in the second period of purity before having intercourse with her. This state, namely the state of purity, is the time for starting "the ‘Iddah that Allah Almighty has commanded for the divorce," i.e., during which, "women", as Allah Almighty says: {O Prophet, when you [believers] divorce women, divorce them with concern to their waiting period.} [Surat at-Talāq: 1] That is to say, divorce them while receiving their ‘Iddah, i.e., at the time they could start the ‘Iddah, and the period of menstruation is not counted in the ‘Iddah. So, if one divorces during this time, his divorce does not occur in the state commanded by Allah, which is starting and entering the ‘Iddah, when the divorce occurs during the period of her purity not during the period of her menstruation. This is because, during the purity period, she can keep an accurate count of her ‘Iddah, which is three Qurū’ (menstrual cycles), and "qur’" is purity, and it was said: menstruation.
In another version, Muhammad ibn Rumh - one of the Hadīth narrators - added: Whenever ‘Abdullah ibn ‘Umar was asked about divorcing a woman during menstruation, he would say to the questioner: If you divorced your wife once or twice then take her back, as the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) commanded me to do so. However, if you divorced her thrice then this is an irrevocable divorce and you cannot take her back and she becomes forbidden for you "until she is married to another man," and he has sexual intercourse with her and then divorces her. After her ‘Iddah is over, she becomes lawful for you again to marry.
And by doing this, you disobeyed Allah and went against Him "regarding what He commanded you in divorcing your wife" during the purity state in which you had intercourse with her, as Allah Almighty says: {O Prophet, when you [believers] divorce women, divorce them with concern to their waiting period.} [Surat at-Talāq: 1]
This clarifies that the divorce counts, whether it is Sunni or Bid‘i. The fact that the Bid‘i divorce is forbidden does not entail that it does not occur. It only means that whoever does this deliberately is considered sinful, yet the divorce still counts.
In a version of Muslim, Anas ibn Sīrīn said to Ibn ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him and his father): "Was that divorce that you gave her when she was menstruating counted as such?" and you considered it one of the three divorces. "‘Abdullah ibn ‘Umar said: Why would I not count it? (It must be counted) even if I failed and acted foolishly," i.e, failed to fulfill an obligation or acted foolishly and did not fulfill it, or failed to take her back and acted foolishly. Would that be an excuse for him, or would his foolishness make it not count, or would his failure invalidate it?! It is a question of disapproval whose answer is supposed to be: Yes, it is counted, and his failure and foolishness do not prevent it from being counted.
The Hadīth indicates the keenness of Islam to restrict the circumference of divorce as much as possible, and if it happens, it does not cause harm to any of the spouses.
It also indicates that the husband alone has the right to Raj‘ah (taking the wife back) without the guardian..

1472
Ibn ‘Abbās reported: The triple divorce during the lifetime of the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) and that of Abu Bakr and two years of the caliphate of ‘Umar was counted as one. Then ‘Umar ibn al-Khattāb said: "Indeed, people have hastened to a matter regarding which they used to act with deliberation. So, if we would make them count (as three divorces)," and he did that..

Commentary : Allah Almighty has made divorce a kind of respite between the spouses when life between them becomes impossible. In Islam, divorce has certain criteria and results in a number of rights.
In this Hadīth, ‘Abdullah ibn ‘Abbās (may Allah be pleased with him) narrates: During the lifetime of the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) and that of Abu Bakr and two years of ‘Umar's caliphate, whoever triply divorced his wife in one session or in one time, would count as a single divorce. An example of this is saying: "You are divorced thrice," or saying: "You are divorced. You are divorced. You are divorced." Then the husband can take his wife back during the period of ‘Iddah (waiting period) without a new contract. If the ‘Iddah is over, he can take her back with a new contract. It is not counted as three divorces that would make his wife unlawful for him until she is married to another man. It is deemed to refer to what was most likely meant, which was the intent of confirmation, not for continuing the count. During the lifetime of ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him), people used this form frequently while most likely intending to continue the count not by way of confirmation. Hence, ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him) made it count as three divorces. He said: "Indeed, people have hastened to a matter regarding which they used to act with deliberation," i.e., they were entitled to three divorces to give themselves a chance to reconsider their affairs, as it might seem better for them to take their wives back. His saying: "So if we made them count," i.e., He consulted those who were with him from the Companions (may Allah be pleased with them) regarding the one who gave three divorces all at once to make such a divorce an irrevocable triple divorce as he uttered, to deter them from rushing into divorce. Thus, he enforced it on people after consulting the senior Companions and their agreement with him.
This is interpreted from him (may Allah be pleased with him) as a form of Ijtihād and laying down rules that would bring benefit to his subjects within the boundaries of Shariah, without making things too difficult or too easy..

1476
‘Ā’ishah reported: The Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) used to seek our permission on the day he had to stay with one of his wives (by turns) after the following verse was revealed: {You [O Prophet] may postpone [the turn of] whoever you wish [of your wives], and you may share your time with whoever of them you wish.} [Surat al-Ahzāb: 51] Mu‘ādhah said to her: What did you use to say to the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) when he asked your permission? She said: I used to say: Were it up to me, I would not give anyone preference over myself..

Commentary : The Prophet's wives loved him dearly to the extent that they used to compete to please him and show their love to him.
In this Hadīth, the Mother of the Believers ‘Ā’ishah (may Allah be pleased with her) reports that the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) used to ask permission from his wife, whose turn was due, to go to another one of his wives. The Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) had nine wives, and he used to allocate a day for each to stay with her overnight. This act of his seeking permission was after the revelation of the following verse: {You [O Prophet] may postpone [the turn of] whoever you wish [of your wives], and you may share your time with whoever of them you wish, and there is no blame on you if you call back any of those whose turn you have set aside. That is more likely that they will be content and not distressed, and that they will be satisfied with what you give them all. Allah knows what is in your hearts, and Allah is All-Knowing, Most Forbearing.} [Surat al-Ahzāb: 51] This verse means: O Messenger, you have the right to delay the turn of whoever you wish of your wives and not stay overnight with her, and you have the right to share your time with whoever you wish of them and stay overnight with her; and there is no blame on you if you call back any of those whom you have delayed. Giving you the choice and making things flexible for you are more likely to make your wives content and satisfied with what you give them all for knowing that you have not neglected duty and have not withheld a right, and Allah knows what is in your hearts - O men - of inclination to some women apart from others, as Allah is All-Knowing of His slaves' actions and nothing thereof is hidden from Him, and He is Most Forbearing and does not hasten to punish them hoping that they may return to Him in repentance.
The female Tābi‘i Mu‘ādhah al-‘Adawiyyah asked ‘Ā’ishah (may Allah be pleased with her): "What did you use to say to the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) when he asked for your permission?" ‘Ā’ishah (may Allah be pleased with her) replied that she used to say to the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him): "Were it up to me," i.e., if this act of seeking permission is in my hands, "I would not give anyone preference over myself," i.e., I would not give my day to another wife. This was due to her love to be close to the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) to serve him, enjoy intimacy with him, and benefit from him.
Such a competition between his wives was not for mere pleasure, intimacy, personal desires, and enjoyment, as is the case with some people. Instead, it was a competition for matters related to the Hereafter and for being close to the master of the first and the last, for expecting the descent of mercy and revelation upon him while being with her and so on.
The Hadīth clarifies one of the Prophet's exclusive rights, namely choosing whomever he wished from his wives whenever he wished.
It also points out some of the etiquettes between spouses and teaches them how a man should seek his wives' permission when sharing his time with them and how the woman should show him love and affection..

1478
Jābir ibn ‘Abdullah reported: Abu Bakr (may Allah be pleased with him) came and sought permission to see the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him). He found people sitting at his door and none amongst them had been granted permission, but it was granted to Abu Bakr and he went in. Then came ‘Umar and he sought permission and it was granted to him. He found the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) sitting sad and silent with his wives around him, and said: He said: I would say something that would make the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) laugh. So, he said: "O Messenger of Allah, I wish you had seen the daughter of Khārijah when she asked me for extra money, and I got up and slapped her on the neck. The Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) laughed and said: "They are around me as you see, asking for extra money." So, Abu Bakr got up and slapped ‘Ā’ishah on the neck, and ‘Umar got up and slapped Hafsah on the neck. Both of them did this saying: "Are you asking the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) what he does not have?!" They said: "By Allah, we would never ask the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) for something that he does not have." Then he retreated from them for a month or for twenty-nine days. Then, the following verse was revealed to him: {O Prophet, tell your wives} until the part that reads {for those who do good among you a great reward.} [Surat al-Azāb: 28-29] He said: So, he started with ‘Ā’ishah, saying: "O ‘Ā’ishah, I want to propound something to you but I wish you not to be hasty concerning it until you consult your parents." She said: "What is that, O Messenger of Allah?" So he recited the verse to her. She said: "Is it concerning you, O Messenger of Allah, that I should consult my parents?! Nay, I choose Allah, His Messenger, and the Final Abode; but I ask you not to tell any of your wives what I have said." He said: "None of them asks me except that I will inform her. Allah did not send me to be harsh, or cause harm, but He sent me to teach and make things easy.".

Commentary : The Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) was generous with his wives and provided for them from what Allah granted him. However, he used to spend often on the cause of Allah and on what would benefit people, leaving only a little for himself and his family. This led to some harm felt by his wives; however, Allah Almighty gave them the choice to either endure life patiently or get a divorce and be separated from him kindly.
In this Hadīth, Jābir ibn ‘Abdullah (may Allah be pleased with him and his father) narrates: Abu Bakr (may Allah be pleased with him) once came and sought permission to see the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) and found people sitting at his door and none among them was granted permission to see the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him). Then, the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) granted Abu Bakr (may Allah be pleased with him) permission and he entered. Then, ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him) came to the Prophet's house and sought permission to enter and he permitted him. On entering, ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him) found the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) sitting with his wives around him and he was intensely sad, so much so that he stopped talking. So, ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him) said to himself - and it was said: The speaker was Abu Bakr - (may Allah be pleased with him): "I should say something that would make the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) laugh." So, he said: "O Messenger of Allah, I wish you had seen," i.e., if you knew that my wife, the daughter of Khārijah, asked and requested from me an extra amount of money, more than the usual or more than needed, so I got up and "slapped her on the neck," i.e., hit her neck with my hand. So, the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) laughed out of the resemblance between his condition and that of ‘Umar. The Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) said: "They", referring to his wives, are sitting "around me as you see, asking for extra money" and requesting more money than the usual amount. When the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) said this, Abu Bakr (may Allah be pleased with him) got up and went to ‘Ā’ishah (may Allah be pleased with her) to slap her on the neck by way of discipline. ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him) also got up to slap his daughter Hafsah (may Allah be pleased with her) on the neck by way of discipline, and each of them was saying to his daughter: "Are you asking the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) for what he does not have?!" It was an expression of rebuke and reprimand for them because of their asking for an extra amount of money while the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) did not have it. "They said: By Allah, we would never ask the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him)," after this "something that he does not have." The Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) got angry because of this and he retreated from his wives for thirty or twenty-nine days without entering their houses or approaching them. Then, the following verses were revealed: {O Prophet, tell your wives, “If you seek the life of this world and its embellishments, then come, I will give you provision and release you graciously. But if you seek Allah and His Messenger and the Final Abode, then Allah has prepared for those who do good among you a great reward.”} [Surat al-Ahzāb: 28-29] The two verses mean: O Prophet, tell your wives when they ask you for an increase in sustenance and you have nothing to give them as an extra amount: If you seek the life of this world and its embellishments, then come I will give you provision that is given to the divorced women and release you in a way that involves no harm or damage. However, if you seek Allah's pleasure and the pleasure of His Messenger, and you seek Paradise in the Final Abode, then endure your conditions patiently, as Allah has prepared for those who do good among you, through patience and good treatment, a great reward.
The Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) started with ‘Ā’ishah (may Allah be pleased with her) in giving her the choice. He called her and informed her that he had something to propound to her and that he wished she would not hasten to give him a reply without consulting her parents. Perhaps this was out of fear for her because of her young age which entailed the desire for worldly embellishments and her not choosing the Hereafter. She asked the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) about that matter and he recited the verse to her, so she hastened to accept being with the Messenger of Allah, and she said: "Is it concerning you," i.e., being separated from you, or staying with you, or regarding your right, "O Messenger of Allah, that I should consult my parents?!" And she told him that she chose Allah, His Messenger, and the Final Abode. She also asked him (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) not to tell any of his wives about her reply out of her jealousy and keenness to have the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) all for herself and enjoy a great deal of his company. In response, he (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) said: "None of them asks me except that I will inform her," to help her make her choice. He justified this by saying that Allah did not send him to be harsh, i.e., causing someone to be in a difficult situation and "‘anat", meaning difficulty and sin as well, "or cause harm," i.e., seek others' mistakes. "But He sent me to teach" people goodness and make things easy. Facilitation here lies in the fact that if he informed them, his other wives would follow the example of ‘Ā’ishah (may Allah be pleased with her) and it would be easy for them to choose Allah Almighty, His Messenger (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him), and the Final Abode.
This Hadīth points out that asking permission is from the Prophet's guidance.
It also indicates that one can discipline one's child, even if he grew up.
It shows the ascetic life of the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) and his abstention from worldly life.
It also demonstrates how the Companions used to console the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) in his sadness.
It denotes the merit of Abu Bakr, ‘Umar, and ‘Ā’ishah (may Allah be pleased with them)..

1479
‘Umar ibn al-Khattāb reported: When the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) secluded himself from his wives, he ('Umar) said: I entered the mosque and found the people pelting the ground with pebbles and saying: The Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) divorced his wives, and that was before they were commanded with Hijāb. ‘Umar said: I said: I must find this out today. He said: I entered upon ‘Ā’ishah and said: O daughter of Abu Bakr, have you gone to the extent of giving trouble to the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him)?! She said: O Ibn al-Khattāb, stay out of my affairs and mind your receptacle. He said: So, I entered upon Hafsah bint ‘Umar and said to her: O Hafsah, have you gone to the extent of giving trouble to the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him)?! By Allah, you know that the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) does not love you, and had it not been for me, the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) would have divorced you. So, she wept bitterly. I said to her: Where is the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him)? She said: He is in his cabinet in the attic room. I went there and found Rabāh, the servant of the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him), sitting on the attic's doorstep with his legs dangling on carved wood, which is a trunk used by the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) to ascend and descend. I called out: O Rabāh, seek permission for me from the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him). Rabāh looked at the room then looked at me and said nothing. Then, I said: O Rabāh, seek permission for me from the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him). Rabāh looked at the room then looked at me and said nothing. Then, I raised my voice and said: O Rabāh, seek permission for me from the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him). I think the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) thought I had come for Hafsah's sake. By Allah, if the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) commands me to strike her neck, I will undoubtedly strike her neck. I raised my voice, and he signaled to me to ascend. I entered upon the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) while he was lying on a straw mat. I sat down and he drew up his lower garment over him and he had nothing else on him, and the mat had left marks on his side. I looked around in the cabinet of the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) and found only a handful of barley around one Sā‘ and an equal quantity of the leaves of mimosa flava placed in one side of the room, and a semi-tanned leather bag hanging. He said: Tears started falling from my eyes. He said: O Ibn al-Khattāb, what makes you weep? I said: O Prophet of Allah, how could I not weep when this straw mat has left marks on your side and I see nothing in your cabinet except what I have seen, while Caesar and Khosrau are enjoying fruits and rivers, whereas you are the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) and His chosen one and this is your cabinet?! He said: O Ibn al-Khattāb, does it not please you that the Hereafter is for us and the worldly life is for them? I said: Yes. He said: When I entered upon him, I saw signs of anger on his face, so I said: O Messenger of Allah, what trouble have the women caused you? If you had divorced them, verily, Allah is with you, His angels, Jibrīl (Gabriel), Mikā’īl (Michael), I, Abu Bakr, and the believers are with you. I rarely spoke - thanks to Allah - any words except that I hoped Allah would confirm the words I uttered, and this verse, Āyat at-Takhyīr (the Verse of Choice), was revealed: {Perhaps, if he were to divorce you all, his Lord would replace you with better wives.} [Surat at-Tahrīm: 5] {But if you insist on conspiring against him, then indeed Allah is his Protector, as well as Gabriel and the righteous believers, and moreover, the angels are his supporters.} [Surat at-Tahrīm: 4] ‘Ā’ishah bint Abi Bakr and Hafsah were cooperating against the rest of the Prophet's wives. I said: O Messenger of Allah, did you divorce them? He said: No. I said: O Messenger of Allah, when I entered the mosque, I found the Muslims pelting the ground with pebbles and saying: The Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) divorced his wives. Should I go down and tell them that you did not divorce them? He said: Yes, if you wish. I kept talking to him until there were no more signs of anger on his face and until he laughed and his teeth showed, and he had the most charming front teeth of all people. Then, the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) descended and I descended while catching hold of the trunk, but the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) went down as if he was walking on the ground without touching it with his hand. I said: O Messenger of Allah, you remained in your room for twenty-nine days. He said: The month consists of twenty-nine days. I, thus, stood at the door of the mosque and called out at the top of my voice: The Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) did not divorce his wives, and this verse was revealed: {Whenever they hear any news of security or fear, they spread it. If they referred it to the Messenger or to those in authority among them, those with sound judgment among them could know it.} [Surat an-Nisā’: 83] And it was I who drew correct conclusions and Allah Almighty revealed the Verse of Choice..

Commentary : Perhaps the Prophet's wives caused him trouble like women usually cause their husbands trouble, resulting from jealousy, vexation, and the like.
In this Hadīth, ‘Umar ibn al-Khattāb (may Allah be pleased with him) narrates that when the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) secluded himself from his wives and swore not to enter upon them, for he was angry with them, ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with them) entered the Prophet's mosque "and found the people pelting the ground with pebbles," i.e., moving them around and throwing them on the ground, which is something normally done by someone concerned and absorbed in thought. "And saying: The Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) divorced his wives," i.e. when they saw how the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) kept himself away from his wives, they thought that he had divorced them, so they said this. "And that was before they were commanded with Hijāb," i.e., women conceal themselves from men. This remark is questionable; rather, it is a clear mistake since Hijāb was enjoined at the time of the Prophet's marriage to Zaynab bint Jahsh (may Allah be pleased with her) in the fourth or fifth year, and Zaynab (may Allah be pleased with her) was among his wives who were given the choice; and the story of his seclusion from his wives and giving them the choice took place in the ninth year of Hijrah. The best thing said with this regard to: "that it was before they were commanded with Hijāb" is from the words of the narrator who, when seeing that 'Umar (may Allah be pleased with him) said he had entered upon 'Ā’ishah (may Allah be pleased with her), thought that this was before Hijāb, so he affirmed it. This could be responded by saying: Entering does not entail removing Hijāb (screen), for he could enter from the door, and she could still talk to him from behind the screen.
Then, ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him) reported that he said to himself: "I must find this out today," i.e., I must find out the truth about this, did the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) divorce them or not? So, ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him) entered upon ‘Ā’ishah (may Allah be pleased with her), the Prophet's wife and Abu Bakr's daughter, and said to her: "O daughter of Abu Bakr, have you gone to the extent of giving trouble to the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him)?!" blaming her for daring to infuriate the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him). ‘Ā’ishah (may Allah be pleased with her) said: "O Ibn al-Khattāb, stay out of my affairs," i.e., you are not entitled to admonish me "and mind your receptacle," i.e., rather, you should admonish the one who matters to you, referring to Hafsah bint ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with her). "‘Aybah" (receptacle): the container used for keeping clothes and precious belongings. A man's "‘aybah": his family and those close to him. Then, ‘Umar entered upon his daughter Hafsah and said to her what he had said to ‘Ā’ishah (may Allah be pleased with them) and added reprovingly: "By Allah, you know that the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) does not love you, and had it not been for me, the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) would have divorced you," deterring and frightening her with divorce and the fact that if it had not been for ‘Umar's special status with the Prophet, this would have occurred. Thereupon, Hafsah cried bitterly because of her sadness about being separated from the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) and expecting her father to be severely mad at her. Then, ‘Umar asked his daughter (may Allah be pleased with both of them) where the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) was. Hafsah (may Allah be pleased with her) said: "He is in his cabinet in the attic room." "Mashrubah" (attic room): is an elevated room for storing food and drink. On entering, 'Umar found Rabāh (may Allah be pleased with him), the Prophet's servant, "sitting on the attic's doorstep," i.e., on the doorsill "with his legs dangling," i.e., stretching and hanging them "on carved wood", which is a trunk that had stairs used by the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) to ascend to the room and descend from that place using it as a stair. ‘Umar, then, called out to Rabāh (may Allah be pleased with both of them) to seek permission for him to enter upon the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him). So, Rabāh looked inside the room, then, looked at ‘Umar and said nothing. This indirectly indicates that the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) had heard ‘Umar's voice; however, he expressed no approval or disapproval of permitting him. So, ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him) again sought permission from the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him), and Rabāh again looked at the room then looked at ‘Umar and said nothing. On the third time, ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him) raised his voice so the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) would hear him and he called out: "O Rabāh, seek permission for me from the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him). I think that the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) thought I had come for Hafsah's sake," i.e., to apologize for what she did and defend her. "By Allah, if the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) commands me to strike her neck, I will certainly strike her neck." This clarified why he sought permission, namely to console the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) and bring him out of his sadness and not for anything related to his daughter Hafsah (may Allah be pleased with her). Rabāh, thus, signaled with his head to ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him) after the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) had permitted him to ascend to him in his attic.
On entering upon the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him), ‘Umar saw him "lying on a straw mat," i.e., lying on his side on the straw mat. Another version in the two "Sahīh Collections" reads: "And he was on a straw mat with nothing between him and the mat," i.e., he was lying thereon without any bedding. "Hasīr" (straw mat): a mat made of palm leaf stalks or others things. 'Umar (may Allah be pleased with him) sat down, so the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) drew up his lower garment over his body to cover it more. "Izār" (lower garment): it is the garment used to cover the lower part of the body. The Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) was not wearing anything except this lower garment. "and the mat had left marks on his side," i.e., it left marks on his side as a result of sleeping on it. 'Umar (may Allah be pleased with him) looked around, exploring the room where the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) was staying and found nothing but a handful - i.e., a pile - of barley equal to one Sā '. Sā‘: it is four Mudds, and one Mudd is equal to an amount that could fill both hands. He found an equal amount of "the leaves of mimosa flava placed in one side of the room," i.e., in one of its sides and at a distance from the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him). It is said that "Qarazh" (mimosa flava) means: a kind of tree used in tanning leather. "And a semi-tanned leather bag hanging," which is leather that is not yet tanned. All this indirectly indicates the threadbareness of the place where the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) was staying and the straitened circumstances he was living in.
‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him) said: "Tears started falling from my eyes," i.e., tears started flowing by way of sympathy for the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him). The Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) asked him about the reason for his weeping, so ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him) replied: "O Prophet of Allah, how could I not weep when this straw mat has left marks on your side and I see nothing in your cabinet except what I see, while Caesar and Khosrau are enjoying fruits and rivers, whereas you are the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) and His chosen one and this is your cabinet?!" All this serves as an indirect reference to the bliss that the disbelievers enjoy compared to the conditions of the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him). What ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him) meant is that the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) and the Muslims are more entitled to this bliss than the disbelievers. Khosrau: it is the title of the Persians' king. Caesar: it is the title of the Romans' king. The Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) said: "O Ibn al-Khattāb, does it not please you that the Hereafter is for us and the worldly life is for them?" In this way, the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) explained to him the logic of the worldly pleasures and that of the Hereafter, as part of Allah's immutable rule regarding His slaves is to make the disbelievers enjoy the worldly pleasures. In contrast, His believing slaves will enjoy the enjoyments of the Hereafter, taking into consideration the contradiction between these two types of pleasures and the believers' eternal abidance in the bliss of Paradise and, on the contrary, the disbelievers' eternal abidance in Hellfire. ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him) said: "Yes" it pleases me, O Messenger of Allah. There were signs of anger on the Prophet's face that ‘Umar noticed the moment he entered, so, ‘Umar said to him: "O Messenger of Allah, what trouble have the women caused you?" He was trying to alleviate the Prophet's sadness and anger. In other words, no trouble will befall you, and you should not care about any of their affairs. "If you had divorced them, verily, Allah is with you, His angels, Jibrīl (Gabriel):" the angel entrusted with the revelation, "Mikā’īl (Michael):" the angel entrusted with the rain and plants, "I, Abu Bakr, and the believers are with you" also with our support and assistance in Da‘wah (call to Allah) and the divine message. ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him) reported that he rarely spoke - thanks be to Allah for this - words except that he hoped Allah would confirm the words he uttered, i.e., he was secretly asking Allah to confirm the soundness of his advice to the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) with Qur’an. 'Umar (may Allah be pleased with him) was then informed that the Verse of Choice was revealed to confirm his speech with the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him). It is the verse where the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) gave his wives the choice either to remain as his wives or to be divorced and released, as Allah Almighty says: {But if you insist on conspiring against him, then indeed Allah is his Protector, as well as Gabriel and the righteous believers, and moreover, the angels are his supporters. Perhaps, if he were to divorce you all, his Lord would replace you with better wives.} [Surat at-Tahrīm: 4-5] It is said: There is no choice in these verses and mentioning it here is a delusion. In Al-Bukhāri's version, it was reported that ‘Umar ibn al-Khattāb (may Allah be pleased with him) reported: "The Prophet's wives backed each other against him out of jealousy, so, I said to them: Perhaps, if he were to divorce you all, his Lord would replace you with better wives; and so this verse was revealed." The sound opinion here is what was proven in the two Sahīh Collections and others, namely that the Verse of Choice is the verse where Allah Almighty says: {O Prophet, tell your wives, “If you seek the life of this world and its embellishments, then come, I will give you provision and release you graciously. But if you seek Allah and His Messenger and the Final Abode, then Allah has prepared for those who do good among you a great reward.”} [Surat al-Ahzāb: 28-29] It is said: There is a missing "and" probably in his saying: "The Verse of Choice", and the correct view is: "This verse and the Verse of Choice were revealed".
He reported that 'Ā’ishah and Hafsah (may Allah be pleased with both of them) used to cooperate against the rest of the Prophet's wives, forming a team together. The cause behind their excessive jealousy was divulging his secret, which made him upset and angry. ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him), then, asked the Messenger of Allah (may Allah be pleased with him) if he had divorced his wives, trying to find out the truth about what people were saying in the mosque. The Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) negated divorcing his wives, and 'Umar (may Allah be pleased with him) informed him of how the people felt sad for the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) because of what was circulated about him divorcing his wives. 'Umar (may Allah be pleased with him), then asked for the Prophet's permission to go down to the people, inform them of the correct news, and clarify the truth for them to rejoice. The Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) agreed and said to him: "If you wish," i.e. if you like and want to do so.
‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him) reported that he kept talking to the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) until there were no more signs of anger on his face and his teeth showed from laughing. "And he had the most charming front teeth of all people." "Thaghr" (front teeth): the mouth and front teeth. Then, the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) descended from the attic where he had been staying in seclusion, and ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him) descended while catching hold of the trunk and resting on it. The Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) went down "as if he was walking on the ground without touching it with his hand," i.e., he did not need to rest on the trunk when coming down due to his strength. ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him) said: "O Messenger of Allah, you remained in your room for twenty-nine," i.e., there is one day left to complete a month, as the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) swore not to have intercourse with his wives for a month. Thereupon, the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) said: "The month consists of twenty-nine," i.e., this month was twenty-nine days. ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him) stood at the door of the mosque and called out at the top of his voice: "The Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) did not divorce his wives", telling and informing the Prophet's Companions that the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) did not divorce his wives contrary to what they had been saying, and this verse was revealed: {Whenever they hear any news of security or fear, they spread it. If they referred it to the Messenger or those in authority among them, those with sound judgment could know it.} [Surat an-Nisā’: 83] When the people said that the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) had divorced his wives based on no information from anyone and without verifying or checking this out, Allah Almighty blamed them because if they had referred this to the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him), he would have informed them of the truth about it, or they could have referred it to someone who could ask and find out the truth about it from the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him). ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him) said: "And it was I who drew correct conclusions," i.e., verified this matter and checked it out.
"And Allah Almighty revealed the Verse of Choice," as previously mentioned. In the two Sahīh Collections, it was mentioned that ‘Ā’ishah (may Allah be pleased with her) said: He started with me as the first woman. The Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) said: "I will mention something, but you should only hasten if you consult your parents. She said: Indeed, I know my parents would not order me to leave you." Al-Bukhāri's version reads: "Then, he gave all of his wives the choice, and they said the same as what ‘Ā’ishah had said."
In some narrations in the two Sahīh Collections, the following was reported: The Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) kept himself secluded from his wives because of the honey he used to drink in the house of Zaynab bint Jahsh. 'Ā’ishah (may Allah be pleased with her) said: "I agreed with Hafsah that the one upon whom the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) would enter should say: I can detect the smell of Maghāfīr in you, did you eat Maghāfīr - Maghāfīr: sweet gum that has a foul odor. When he entered upon one of them, she said that to him, and he said: No, but I drank honey in the house of Zaynab bint Jahsh, and I will not drink it again. Thereupon, this verse was revealed: {O Prophet, why do you prohibit [yourself from] what Allah has made lawful to you} to: {You both had better turn to Allah in repentance.} [Surat at-Tahrīm: 1-4] to ‘Ā’ishah and Hafsah, {And [remember] when the Prophet told one of his wives something in secret} [Surat at-Tahrīm: 3], as he said: No, but I drank honey." It is said: The reason is that the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) had sexual intercourse with his bondmaid Māriyah in the house of Hafsah (may Allah be pleased with her) and Hafsah (may Allah be pleased with her) learned about it. So, the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) ordered her not to inform ‘Ā’ishah (may Allah be pleased with her). However, Hafsah (may Allah be pleased with her) revealed the Prophet's secret to ‘Ā’ishah (may Allah be pleased with her). It is also said: The reason is the things they did as a whole that enraged the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) and not a specific incident.
The Hadīth shows the Prophet's good morals and how he would honor whoever smiled at him by smiling back at him.
It also indicates the manifest merit of ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him).
It points out how a man should advise his daughter and fix her manners towards her husband.
It also signifies that putting a lot of pressure on women is something dispraised.
It encourages favoring the Hereafter by performing acts of obedience, avoiding sins, and refraining from being preoccupied with the pursuit of worldly pleasures..

1480
Abu Is-hāq reported: I was with Al-Aswad ibn Yazīd sitting in the grand mosque, and Ash-Sha‘bi was with us, and he narrated the Hadīth of Fātimah bint Qays: The Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) entitled her to no housing or financial maintenance. Then, Al-Aswad took a handful of pebbles and threw it at him and said: Woe to you! How could you narrate this?! ‘Umar said: We must not abandon the Book of Allah and the Sunnah of our Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) on account of a woman's statement. We do not know whether she memorized or forgot. She is entitled to housing and financial maintenance. Allah Almighty says: {Do not force them out of their houses, nor should they leave unless they commit a clear shameful act.} [Surat at-Talāq: 1].

Commentary : Allah has prescribed divorce after sparing no effort in reconciliation between the spouses. He has clarified its rulings and consequences, and He has made it three incidents of divorce so that each of the spouses would reconsider his stance; otherwise, they should be separated after the third incident of divorce, and the woman becomes unlawful for him after that until she is married to another man.
This Hadīth is related to a story mentioned in the two Sahīh Collections and others about the female Companion Fātimah bint Qays (may Allah be pleased with her) who was triply divorced by her husband. The Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) commanded her to move to the house of Ibn' Umm Maktūm - who was her cousin and was blind - and spend her 'Iddah (waiting period) there. He made her not entitled to financial maintenance for her particular case, as she used to offend her husband's family verbally or because she was in a desolate area and it was feared that someone might assault her; hence, he moved her to the house of Ibn' Umm Maktūm, as he was blind and would not see her. Fātimah bint Qays kept on narrating this Hadīth of hers after the Prophet's death; however, a group of the Companions disapproved of it. The Tābi‘i Abu Is-hāq as-Sabī‘i narrates that he was with Al-Aswad ibn Yazīd an-Nakha‘i - one of the Tābi‘is - in the great mosque, i.e., the grand mosque, which refers to the mosque of Kūfah, while Ash-Sha‘bi - ‘Āmir ibn Sharāhīl one of the Tābi‘is - was narrating the Hadīth of Fātimah bint Qays in this mosque, i.e., giving a legal fatwa based on this Hadīth. In this Hadīth, it is stated that the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) did not make Fātimah entitled to housing or financial maintenance after being triply divorced. So, Al-Aswad took a handful of pebbles and threw them at him and said: "Woe to you!", i.e., may Allah afflict you with ruin and destruction. It was a common saying among the Arabs that was not intended as a supplication. "How could you narrate this?!" All this was meant to express Al-Aswad's disapproval of Ash-Sha‘bi's narration of this Hadīth. Then, he informed him that ‘Umar ibn al-Khattāb (may Allah be pleased with him) said: "We must not abandon the Book of Allah and the Sunnah of our Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) on account of a woman's statement," i.e., we do not rely on issuing a Fatwa (legal opinion) like this on the Hadīth of Fātimah, given the importance of such a Fatwa, because she might have memorized it in the wrong way or she might have forgotten. Perhaps what ‘Umar meant by the Prophet's Sunnah was what his rulings indicated of adhering to the Book of Allah not a specific Sunnah in this regard. ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him), then, supported his saying that the triply divorced woman is entitled to housing and financial maintenance in her ‘Iddah by the verse in which Allah Almighty says: {O Prophet, when you [believers] divorce women, divorce them with consideration to their waiting period and keep a precise count of the waiting period, and fear Allah, your Lord. Do not force them out of their houses, nor should they leave unless they commit a clear shameful act.} [Surat at-Talāq: 1] In other words: O people, fear Allah your Lord and beware of disobeying Him by transgressing His limit; do not force your divorced wives out of their houses, where you made them live before divorce, until their ‘Iddah is over. "Shameful act" here refers to recalcitrance and bad morals. It is said: It means indecency towards her husband's family. It is also said that it means: Unless they commit adultery.
The Hadīth of Fātimah bint Qays was refuted by a group of the Companions, including ‘Umar, ‘Ā’ishah, and others who knew the Sunnah better than Fātimah bint Qays. Some considered the apparent meaning of the Hadīth and, thus, made the triply divorced woman entitled to spend her 'Iddah wherever she chooses without being obliged to spend the night at her ex-husband's house.
The Hadīth shows how a scholar should be corrected, even in his gatherings of knowledge, if he is mistaken.
It also highlights the Companions' keenness on adhering to the Qur’an and the authentic Sunnah..

1480
‘Ubaydullah ibn ‘Abdullah ibn ‘Utbah reported: Abu ‘Amr ibn Hafs ibn al-Mughīrah set out along with ‘Ali ibn Abi Tālib to Yemen. He sent to his wife, Fātimah bint Qays, one pronouncement of divorce that was still left from her divorce. He commanded Al-Hārith ibn Hishām and ‘Ayyāsh ibn Abi Rabī‘ah to give her alimony. They said to her: By Allah, there is no alimony for you unless you are pregnant. Thereupon, she went to the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) and informed him of what they had said. He said: There is no alimony for you. She, then, asked his permission to move, and he permitted her. She said: O Messenger of Allah, where? He said: To the house of Ibn ’Umm Maktūm, as he was blind and she could take off her clothes in his presence and he would not see her. When her ‘Iddah (waiting period) was over, the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) gave her in marriage to Usāmah ibn Zayd. Marwān sent Qabīsah ibn Dhu’ayb to ask her about the Hadīth, and she narrated it to him, whereupon Marwān said: We have not heard this Hadīth except from a woman. We shall adopt a safe path that we have found people upon. On hearing what Marwān said, Fātimah said: The Qur’an is between me and you. Allah Almighty says: {Do not force them out of their houses.} [Surat at-Talāq: 1] She said: This is regarding revocable divorce. What happens after the three? Why do you say there is no alimony for her if she is not pregnant? Then, on what grounds do you restrain her?.

Commentary : Allah has prescribed divorce and clarified its rulings and consequences after sparing no effort in reconciliation between the spouses. He has made it three incidents of divorce so that each of the spouses would reconsider their stance; otherwise, they should be separated after the third incident of divorce, and the woman becomes unlawful for him after that until she is married to another man.
In this Hadīth, the Tābi‘i ‘Ubaydullah ibn ‘Abdullah ibn ‘Utbah reports that the Companion Abu ‘Amr ibn Hafs ibn al-Mughīrah (may Allah be pleased with him) set out on a journey along with ‘Ali ibn Abi Tālib (may Allah be pleased with him) to Yemen when the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) sent him there. Abu ‘Amr (may Allah be pleased with him) sent to his wife Fātimah bint Qays a pronouncement of divorce while traveling. He had previously divorced her twice and had taken her back, and this was the third incident that made the divorce irrevocable. Abu ‘Amr (may Allah be pleased with him) commanded Al-Hārith ibn Hishām and ‘Ayyāsh ibn Abi Rabī‘ah (may Allah be pleased with both of them) to give her alimony. Another version narrated by Muslim reads: "He sent his deputy to her with barley, " but Fātimah declined it because she found it inadequate and did not accept it. They said to her: "By Allah, there is no alimony for you" because you are irrevocably divorced, and alimony is not for someone in your case "unless you are pregnant". In the version of An-Nasā’i: "So, she sent to Al-Hārith and 'Ayyāsh asking them for the alimony that was appointed for her by her husband, and they said: By Allah, no alimony is due on us for her unless she is pregnant, and she is not entitled to live in our house except with our permission." Thereupon, Fātimah went to the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) and informed him of what they had said, namely that she was not entitled to alimony unless she was pregnant. The Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) approved of what they had said and said to her: "There is no alimony for you." She then sought the Prophet's permission to move from her house, where she was divorced, as she was afraid for herself. The Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) permitted her to move to the house of her cousin Ibn' Umm Maktūm as he was blind and would not see her when taking off her clothes. His permission for her to go out is justified by the fact that he permitted her to move for an excuse, namely her indecency towards her husband's relatives or her fear that she might be assaulted, as mentioned in the narrations. However, if there is no need, then it is impermissible for her to go out or move, and it is forbidden to move her. Allah Almighty says: {Do not force them out of their houses, nor should they leave unless they commit a clear shameful act.} [Surat at-Talāq: 1] "Shameful act" here refers to recalcitrance and bad morals. It is said: It means indecency towards her husband's family. It is also said that it means: Unless they commit adultery.
When her 'Iddah was over, the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) gave her in marriage to Usāmah ibn Zayd (may Allah be pleased with him and his father) for knowing that he was religious, virtuous, had good morals and noble traits.
At that time, Marwān ibn al-Hakam was the ruler of Madīnah. He sent Qabīsah ibn Dhu’ayb to Fātimah (may Allah be pleased with her) to ask about this Hadīth, and she narrated it to him. The reason why Marwān asked her was mentioned in the version of An-Nasā’i: "'Abdullah ibn' Amr ibn' Uthmān, being a young man in the emirate of Marwān, divorced the daughter of Sa‘īd ibn Zayd and her mother was Bint Qays al-Battah. So, her maternal aunt, Fātimah bint Qays, sent to her commanding her to move from the house of 'Abdullah ibn' Amr. When Marwān heard about that, he sent to the daughter of Sa‘īd, commanding her to return to her house and asking her why she moved from her house before completing her 'Iddah." She informed him of the Hadīth of Fātimah, thereupon, Marwān was sent to Fātimah to verify this Hadīth. After hearing her Hadīth, Marwān said: "We have not heard this Hadīth except from a woman," by way of disapproval, and before Marwān, ‘Umar ibn al-Khattāb and ‘Ā’ishah (may Allah be pleased with both of them) expressed their disapproval of Fātimah's Hadīth. Marwān said: "We shall adopt a safe path that we found people upon," i.e., what is reliable, strong, and authentic and what people held fast upon and adhered to and acted upon. In other words, we shall adopt the opinion that a woman must not leave her house except after her ‘Iddah is over and that there is no alimony for her. On hearing what Marwān said and how he prevented the irrevocably divorced woman from leaving her house under all circumstances, Fātimah (may Allah be pleased with her) said: The Qur’an is between me and you, Allah Almighty says: {Do not force them out of their houses.} [Surat at-Talāq: 1] Taking this as supporting evidence, she said: This prohibition, which is understood from the first part of the verse, addresses the husband who can take back his wife, i.e., the housing is for the divorced woman whose divorce is revocable, which accords with what Allah Almighty says: {Then when they have approached the end of their waiting period, either retain them honorably or part with them honorably.} [Surat at-Talāq: 2] She said: So, what happens after the three incidents of divorce? How do you prevent her from going out, then, you say: There is no alimony for her unless she is pregnant? Then, on what grounds do you restrain her? She said this as an objection to Marwān, who made the irrevocably divorced woman entitled to housing and prevented her from going out without giving her financial maintenance. To sum up, her objection was: If you do not make the alimony obligatory, how could you prevent her from going out if the alimony is the recompense of being restrained?!.

1481
‘Ā’ishah reported: It is no good for Fātimah to mention this. He said: She was referring to her statement: No housing or financial maintenance..

Commentary : Allah has prescribed divorce for spouses who choose separation after exerting their utmost in reconciliation between them. He has made it three incidents of divorce so that each of the two spouses would reconsider their stance. Otherwise, they would be separated after the third incident of divorce, and she becomes unlawful for him after this until she gets married to another man. Islam has also regulated the rights and duties between spouses after divorce.
In this Hadīth, Muhammad ibn al-Qāsim narrates that when the Mother of the Believers ‘Ā’ishah (may Allah be pleased with her) was informed of what Fātimah bint Qays had said, namely that her husband had divorced her thrice and the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) did not make her entitled to housing or financial maintenance during her ‘Iddah (waiting period), she said disapprovingly: "It is no good for Fātimah" bint Qays "to mention" and narrate "this" Hadīth to people because it contradicts the explicit texts of the Book of Allah Almighty and the Sunnah of His Messenger (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him).
A group of the Companions, including ‘Umar, ‘Ā’ishah and others, rejected the Hadīth of Fātimah bint Qays because it contradicts, in their opinion, the verse in which Allah Almighty says: {O Prophet, when you [believers] divorce women, divorce them with concern to their waiting period and keep an accurate count of the waiting period, and fear Allah, your Lord. Do not force them out of their houses, nor should they leave unless they commit a clear shameful act. Such are the limits ordained by Allah.} [Surat at-Talāq: 1] It is said: The Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) commanded her to leave her house and spend her 'Iddah in the house of Ibn' Umm Maktūm and did not make her entitled to financial maintenance only because of her special case, as she used to verbally offend her husband's family, or because she was in a desolate place and it was feared that her husband or anyone else might assault her. 'Ā’ishah (may Allah be pleased with her) censured her narration..

1482
Fātimah bint Qays reported that she said: "O Messenger of Allah, my husband divorced me thrice, and I am afraid that my house will be broken into." So, he commanded her, and she moved (to another house)..

Commentary : Allah has prescribed divorce for spouses who choose separation after exerting their utmost in attempting reconciliation between them. He has made it three divorces; so that each of the two spouses would reconsider their stance. Otherwise, they would be separated after the third divorce, and she becomes unlawful for him after this until she gets married to another man. Islam has also regulated the rights and duties between spouses after divorce. Allah Almighty has commanded the divorced woman - whether the divorce is revocable or irrevocable - to spend the ‘Iddah (waiting period) in her house. Allah Almighty says: {O Prophet, when you [believers] divorce women, divorce them with concern to their waiting period and keep an accurate count of the waiting period, and fear Allah, your Lord. Do not force them out of their houses, nor should they leave unless they commit a clear shameful act. Such are the limits ordained by Allah.} [Surat at-Talāq: 1]
In this Hadīth, Fātimah bint Qays (may Allah be pleased with her) narrates that she came to the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) and said: "O Messenger of Allah, my husband divorced me thrice," so the divorce was irrevocable and final. "And I am afraid that my house will be broken into" during her stay in his house for her ‘Iddah. "Iqtihām" (breaking into): entering quickly. This means: She was afraid that someone would enter upon her and harm her because she was in a desolate place. Thereupon, the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) commanded her to leave that place and she went to the house of her paternal cousin, Ibn ’Umm Maktūm, because he was blind, and she could take off her clothes without him seeing her. Since she did not spend her ‘Iddah in her husband's house, the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) did not make her entitled to habitation or financial sustenance during her ‘Iddah..

1483
Jābir ibn ‘Abdullah reported: My maternal aunt was divorced, and she wanted to harvest her date palm trees. A man rebuked her for going out, so she went to the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) who said: "Yes, go out and harvest your date palm trees, for you may give (some of it) in charity or do a good deed.".

Commentary : The Islamic Shariah has brought facilitation and goodness to people. It takes into consideration their conditions when carrying out the Shariah rulings to prevent them from falling into difficulty or distress.
In this Hadīth, Jābir ibn ‘Abdullah (may Allah be pleased with him and his father) narrates that his maternal aunt - it was said: her name is Asmā’ - was irrevocably divorced, as mentioned in the version of Abu Dāwūd: "My maternal aunt was divorced thrice." She wanted to go out, during her ‘Iddah (waiting period), to collect the fruits from her date palm trees; however, a man rebuked her and forbade her from going out until her ‘Iddah was over. She went to the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) to ask him. She informed him of what had happened and of her condition and her need for harvesting her date palm trees and asked him if it was permissible for her to go out of her house during her ‘Iddah due to this necessity. The Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessing be upon him) replied saying: "Yes," and the version of Abu Dāwūd reads: "Go out," and collect your fruits, for perhaps after collecting the fruit of your date palm trees you may give part of it in charity to the poor and the needy "or do a good deed." "Ma‘rūf" (good deed): a comprehensive name including every known act of obeying Allah and doing good to people. This is an explanation of permitting the act of going out, even though it came in the form of notifying and urging her to do good. Moreover, he permitted her to go out due to her need to look after her interests, her date palm trees, and her properties as understood from the apparent indication of the beginning of the Hadīth.
Perhaps the difference between charity and a good deed is that the former refers to obligatory charity, while the latter refers to voluntary charity. The Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) said this to her only because he knew that she was a charitable person, who used to do good deeds frequently, or he answered her with what would guide her to charity and voluntary charity, and this denotes obvious kindness and wisdom.
The Hadīth implies guiding the questioner to what is good for him in his religion and worldly matters and adding to the response what the questioner needs.
It also indicates the permissibility of going out for the divorced woman during her ‘Iddah for a necessity and for fulfilling her interests that she cannot dispense with.
It denotes the permissibility of being keen on preserving wealth and acquiring it to do good and use it in consoling others.
It also indicates that charity in dates is to be given at the time of their harvest, and gifting others therefrom.
It also includes giving an indirect reference to the dates' owner to give charity and reminding him of good deeds and beneficence..

1493
Sa‘īd ibn Jubayr reported: I was asked about the two who swore the oath of condemnation during the governance of Mus‘ab; should they be separated? I did not know what to say, so I went to Ibn ‘Umar's house in Makkah. I said to the servant: Seek permission for me. He said: He is taking a nap; but he heard my voice and said: Is this Ibn Jubayr? I said: Yes. He said: Come in. By Allah, you have not come at this time except for a need. I entered and found him lying on a saddlecloth and resting his head on a fibre-filled pillow. I said: O Abu ‘Abdur-Rahmān, should the two involved in a case of Li‘ān (oath of condemnation) be separated? He said: Glory be to Allah! Yes. The first one who asked about this was so-and-so, the son of so-and-so. He said: O Messenger of Allah, what if any of us found his wife committing adultery? What should he do? If he were to say anything, his statement would be a horrible matter, and if he were to remain silent, his silence about the matter would also be terrible. He said: The Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) kept silent and did not answer him. Later on, he came to him and said: I have been afflicted with what I asked you about. Thereupon, Allah Almighty revealed these verses of Surat an-Nūr: {As for those who accuse their wives [of adultery]} [Surat an-Nūr: 6] So, he recited them to him, admonished and reminded him, and informed him that the worldly punishment is less severe than the punishment of the Hereafter. He said: No, by the One Who sent you with the truth I did not lie about her. Then, he called her, admonished and reminded her and informed her that the worldly punishment is less severe than the punishment of the Hereafter. She said: No, by the One Who sent you with the truth, he is a liar. So, he started with the man who testified four times by Allah that he was truthful and the fifth time that the curse of Allah would be upon him if he were a liar. Then, the woman came next, and she testified four times by Allah that he was a liar and the fifth time that Allah's wrath would be upon her if he were truthful. Then, he separated the two of them..

Commentary : The noble Shariah has clarified the rulings of marriage between the man and the woman and has explained the rulings of the husband's accusation of his wife for committing adultery without evidence and the consequent practice of Li‘ān, besides other rulings of separation, to protect lineages, repel shame from the spouses, and ward off the legally prescribed punishment of Qadhf (false accusation of adultery).
In this Hadīth, the great Tābi‘i Sa‘īd ibn Jubayr tells us that he was asked about the ruling of the two involved in Li‘ān - when a husband accuses his wife of adultery and denies the attribution of her child to himself and the woman negates this, they are required to practice Li‘ān (oath of condemnation) - should they be separated? He did not know what to say and was not aware of the ruling in this regard, and this was during the governance of Mus‘ab ibn az-Zubayr, who was the ruler of Iraq. Mus‘ab did not separate the spouses who practiced Li‘ān, as clarified in another version of Muslim.
Sa‘īd said: "So, I went to the house of Ibn ‘Umar in Makkah" showing that it was a different house than that in Madīnah. It seems that it was the house of Ibn ‘Umar where he stayed when going to Makkah for Hajj or ‘Umrah, and it seems also that Sa‘īd traveled from Kūfah to Makkah. On reaching the house of Ibn ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him and his father), he asked the boy, Ibn ‘Umar's servant, to seek permission for him to enter. The servant informed him that Ibn ‘Umar was taking a nap, it was noontime and midday. Ibn ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him and his father) heard the voice of Ibn Jubayr and recognized him and asked: Is this Ibn Jubayr who is asking for permission? Ibn Jubayr replied: Yes, I am Sa‘īd ibn Jubayr. So, he permitted him to enter and said: "By Allah, you have not come at this time except for a need." This signifies the understanding and modesty of Ibn ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him and his father) and how he did not make things difficult for whoever needed him during his rest, knowing that the one who would come to him during his rest had only come for a necessity; hence, he should not be upset with him; rather, he should receive him with a cheerful face. Ibn Jubayr entered upon Ibn ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him and his father) and found him lying on a "saddlecloth," a cloth laid on an animal's back under the saddle, and he was resting his head on a pillow, which is a cushion, and it was filled with fiber, i.e., tree or palm cortex.
Then, Sa‘īd ibn Jubayr said: "O Abu ‘Abdur-Rahmān," which is the nickname of ‘Abdullah ibn ‘Umar, and he asked him: Should the two involved in a case of Li‘ān be separated? Ibn ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him and his father) said: "Glory be to Allah! Yes." Ibn ‘Umar glorified Allah to express his surprise that Sa‘īd ibn Jubayr was unaware of this famous ruling. Ibn ‘Umar then said: "The first one who asked about this," i.e., the first one who asked the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) about what you asked me about "was so-and-so the son of so-and-so," who was ‘Uwaymir al-‘Ajlāni as mentioned in another version in Sahīh Muslim Collection: "The Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) separated between the two members of Banu al-‘Ajlān." He asked: O Messenger of Allah, tell me about the ruling of one who found his wife committing adultery; what should he do in such a situation? If he spoke about what he had seen, "his statement would be a horrible matter" that people would find disgusting. It would be Qadhf (false accusation of adultery) that entails flogging as a legally prescribed punishment in case he brought no evidence. "And if he were to remain silent" and did not speak about what he had seen, his silence about the matter would also be horrible and an unbearable feeling of anger. Ibn ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him and his father) reported that the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) remained silent and did not answer the man's question, waiting for the revelation and considering this a serious issue. The Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) would hate questions about things that did not occur. This man who asked the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) came back after some time and said: O Messenger of Allah, "I have been afflicted by" the matter I had asked you about, i.e., I have been afflicted and tested in this regard, as I saw my wife committing adultery. Thereupon, Allah Almighty revealed verses of Surat an-Nūr: {As for those who accuse their wives [of adultery] but have no witnesses except themselves, then the evidence of one of them is to testify four times by Allah that he is telling the truth, and the fifth [oath] is that may Allah curse him if he is telling a lie. But she will be spared the punishment if she testifies four times by Allah that he is telling a lie, and the fifth [oath] is that may Allah’s wrath be upon her if he is telling the truth.} [Surat an-Nūr: 6-9] This means: That Men who accuse their wives without having witnesses besides their own selves to testify to the truthfulness of their accusation, each of them should testify four times by Allah: that he is telling the truth about accusing his wife of adultery, then, in the fifth testimony, he should add the supplication against himself of being worthy of curse if he was lying about his accusation, which makes her subject to the legal prescribed punishment of adultery. What spares her this punishment is to testify four times by Allah that he is lying about accusing her, then, in her fifth testimony, she should add the supplication against herself of being liable to Allah's wrath if he was telling the truth about what he accuses her of.
The Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) recited these verses to the man and admonished him in the hope that he might take back his accusation "and reminded him" to repent, telling him that the worldly punishment - which is the legally prescribed punishment of Qadhf - is less severe and much easier than the punishment of the Hereafter. However, the man said: "No" I shall not take back what I said because it is true, and he swore, saying: By the One Who sent you with the truth, I did not lie about her by accusing her of adultery and immorality. Then, the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) called the woman and admonished her to repent in case she had sinned. He reminded and informed her that the worldly punishment - which is the prescribed punishment of adultery, i.e., being stoned - is less severe and much easier than the punishment of the Hereafter. However, the woman swore that her husband was lying in his claim against her. Thereupon, the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) commanded both of them to swear the oath of condemnation. The Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) started with the man since Allah Almighty started with him in the verse. The man swore four times by Allah that he was telling the truth about what he accused her of, and in the fifth testimony, he invoked the curse upon himself if he was a liar. Then, it was the woman's turn. So, she swore four times by Allah that her husband was lying about his claim against her by accusing her of adultery and immorality, and in the fifth, she supplicated against herself invoking Allah's wrath upon her if her husband was truthful in what he said. So, none of them admitted the truthfulness of the other. Hence, the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) separated between them. One of the rulings of Li‘ān is that if each of the spouses insists on what he said, then, they should not be united after Li‘ān and their marriage is invalidated.
The Hadīth clarifies the ruling of Li‘ān and its manner.
It points out how the sinner should be admonished and reminded of repentance..

1495
‘Abdullah reported: It was Friday night, and we were in the mosque when a man from the Ansār (supporters) came and said: If a man found another man with his wife and he speaks about it, you will flog him; or if he kills, you will kill him; and if he remains silent, he will remain silent in anger. By Allah, I will surely ask the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) about it. On the next day, he came to the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) and asked him saying: If a man found another man with his wife and he speaks about it, you will flog him; or if he kills, you will kill him; or if he remains silent, he will remain silent in anger. He said: O Allah, judge; and he kept supplicating, so the verse of Li‘ān (oath of condemnation) was revealed: {As for those who accuse their wives [of adultery] but have no witnesses except themselves} [Surat an-Nūr: 6], these verses. This man, of all people, was afflicted with this. So, he came with his wife to the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) and swore the oath of condemnation. The man testified four times by Allah that he was from the truthful, then, the fifth time he invoked a curse that Allah's curse be upon him if he was from the liars. She went to invoke a curse, but the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) said to her: Stop. However, she refused and invoked a curse. After they had both left, he said: Perhaps she will give birth to a curly-haired black child, and she gave birth to a curly-haired black child..

Commentary : The Shariah has clarified the rulings of marriage between the man and the woman and has explained the rulings of the husband's accusation of his wife for committing adultery without evidence and the consequent practice of Li‘ān, besides other rulings of separation, to protect lineages, repel shame from the spouses, and ward off the legally prescribed punishment of Qadhf (false accusation of adultery).
In this Hadīth, ‘Abdullah ibn Mas‘ūd (may Allah be pleased with him) narrates that they were in the Prophet's mosque on Friday night when a man from the Ansār - the people of Madīnah - came. It was Hilāl ibn ’Umayyah, and it is said: ‘Uwaymir al-‘Ajlāni. He said: "If a man found another man with his wife," i.e., he saw her committing adultery with him. If "he speaks" about it, "you will flog him" inflicting on him the legally prescribed punishment of Qadhf for having no witnesses, and if "he kills" the adulterer, "you will kill him" by way of legal retribution. "And if he remains silent" and does nothing, "he will remain silent in anger," i.e., anger and hatred for her. It seems that the man's speech was before the revelation of the verses of Li‘ān and it also seems that it was a mere question posed by that man at that time, not a real incident that had already occurred. The Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) used to hate such questions as mentioned in the Hadīth of Sahl ibn Sa‘d in the two Sahīh Collections.
Then, this man swore to ask the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) about this matter. On the next day - the next morning - the man went to the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) asking about what was previously mentioned. Thereupon, the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) supplicated: "O Allah, judge," i.e., clarify to us the ruling in this regard, and he continued supplicating Allah Almighty to clarify this incident, so, the verses of Li‘ān were revealed. These are the verses in which Allah Almighty says: {As for those who accuse their wives [of adultery] but have no witnesses except themselves, then the evidence of one of them is to testify four times by Allah that he is telling the truth, and the fifth [oath] is that may Allah curse him if he is telling a lie. But she will be spared the punishment if she testifies four times by Allah that he is telling a lie, and the fifth [oath] is that may Allah’s wrath be upon her if he is telling the truth.} [Surat an-Nūr: 6-9] This means: Men who accuse their wives without having witnesses besides their own selves to testify to the truthfulness of their accusation, each of them should swear four times by Allah that he is telling the truth about accusing his wife of adultery. Then, in the fifth testimony, he should add the supplication against himself of being worthy of condemnation if he is lying about his accusation, which makes her subject to the legally prescribed punishment of adultery. What spares her of this punishment is to testify four times by Allah that he is lying about accusing her. Then, in her fifth testimony, she should add the supplication against herself of being liable for Allah's wrath if he is telling the truth about what he accuses her of.
Among all people, this man was afflicted by the occurrence of what he asked about to his wife. So, he accompanied his wife to the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him). They both swore the oath of condemnation, i.e., the man testified four times by Allah that he was telling the truth, and then, the fifth time, he invoked the curse of Allah upon himself if he was lying. This is because testimony in an adultery case is not complete except with four witnesses, but this case was witnessed by none except the husband; hence, he was assigned four testimonies so that each oath would replace a witness, as an oath could sometimes replace a witness like when someone is entitled to some right but has one witness only. In this case, the Shariah considers his oath in place of the witness. After completing the four testimonies that replace the four witnesses, nothing is left after the testimony of the four witnesses in adultery against the married person, as in this case, except stoning, which is death. There is nothing left after taking the oath of condemnation four times except the curse of Allah Almighty or His wrath, which also indicates death (ruin). The woman, then, went to swear the oath of condemnation, but the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) said to her: "Stop," a word meant here to deter her, i.e., refrain and take your time. However, she refused to stop or be dissuaded from completing Li‘ān. Hence, she took her part in Li‘ān. When the two parties swore the oath of condemnation and went away after finishing their testimonies, the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) said: "Perhaps she will give birth to" the baby in her womb, and he will be "a curly-haired black child," i.e., not straight-haired, which was the description of the one she was accused of committing adultery with. It is as if the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) most likely believed that she was lying, and the child she gave birth to was just as the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) had described.
The Hadīth clarifies that the ruling of Li‘ān, in principle, is to take place between the man and his wife if he accuses her of adultery and has no witness but himself.
It also points out that things must be judged according to what is apparent, whereas Allah Almighty is the One Who judges the intentions.
It explains how Li‘an must take place in the presence of the Imam or the judge and in the presence of an assembly of people.
It shows the condition that makes Li‘ān obligatory, which is the woman's denial of committing adultery because if she admits it, Li‘ān becomes impermissible and she becomes subject to the legally prescribed punishment.
It also signifies that it is Sunnah for the ruler to admonish the two persons involved in Li‘ān when intending to swear the oath of condemnation, which becomes confirmed after the fifth time..

1496
Muhammad ibn Sīrīn reported: I asked Anas ibn Mālik, knowing that he had knowledge of that, and he said: Hilāl ibn ’Umayyah accused his wife of committing adultery with Sharīk ibn Sahmā’, the brother of Al-Barā’ ibn Mālik from his mother's side. He was the first man who practiced Li‘ān (oath of condemnation) in Islam. He swore oaths of Li‘ān against his wife, so the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) said: "Watch her, if she gives birth to a white-complexioned child having straight hair and sore eyes, he is the son of Hilāl ibn ’Umayyah, but if she gives birth to a child with dark eyelids, curly hair, and thin shanks, then he is the son of Sharīk ibn Sahmā’." He (the narrator) said: I was informed that she gave birth to a child with dark eyelids, curly hair, and thin shanks..

Commentary : The Shariah has clarified the rulings of marriage between the man and the woman and has explained the rulings of the husband's accusation of his wife for committing adultery without evidence, and the consequent practice of Li‘ān, besides other rulings of separation, to protect lineages, repel guilt from the spouses, and ward off the legal prescribed punishment of Qadhf (false accusation of adultery).
In this Hadīth, the Tābi‘i Muhammad ibn Sīrīn narrates that he asked Anas ibn Mālik (may Allah be pleased with him) about an issue, thinking that he had knowledge of it, namely the issue of Li‘ān that occurs between spouses when the husband accuses his wife of adultery without having witnesses as evidence. Anas ibn Mālik (may Allah be pleased with him) informed him that Hilāl ibn ’Umayyah al-Wāqifi (may Allah be pleased with him) - one of the three who stayed behind and Allah accepted their repentance after the Battle of Tabūk - accused his wife of committing adultery with a man called Sharīk ibn Sahmā’, who was the brother of Al-Barā’ ibn Mālik, and Al-Barā’ was the brother of Anas ibn Mālik from his father.
Hilāl ibn ’Umayyah (may Allah be pleased with him) was the first man to practice Li‘ān in Islam. Li‘ān: It is when a man takes an oath four times that he is truthful about accusing his wife of adultery, and on the fifth time he swears that may Allah curse him if he is lying. Then, the woman proceeds and takes an oath four times that her husband is lying, and on the fifth time she swears that may Allah's wrath be upon her if he is telling the truth. Li‘ān took place between both of them and after they were gone, the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) said: "Watch her," i.e., look at the baby's features so we may know which of them is lying, as she got pregnant during that period. If the child is "a white-complexioned child having straight hair," i.e., has flowing hair and "sore eyes," i.e., his eyes are sore because of tears, redness, or any other reason, "then he is the son of Hilāl ibn ’Umayyah," i.e., his father is Hilāl because these are his features. "But if she gives birth to a child with dark eyelids," i.e., with black eyelids, "curly hair," i.e., with hair that is curved and twisted, and "thin shanks," i.e., with tiny and thin legs, then his father is Sharīk ibn Sahmā’. Anas (may Allah be pleased with him) reported that he was informed that the child resembled Sharīk ibn Sahmā’ whom she was accused of committing adultery with.
The Hadīth points out that the ruling of Li‘ān, in principle, is to take place between the man and his wife if he accuses her of adultery without having a witness but himself.
It also clarifies that Li‘ān should take place in the presence of the Imam or the judge and in the presence of an assembly of people..

1498
Abu Hurayrah reported: Sa‘d ibn ‘Ubādah al-Ansāri said: O Messenger of Allah, what if a man finds his wife with another man? Should he kill him? The Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) said: No. Sa‘d said: Yes, by the One Who honored you with the truth. Thereupon, the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) said: Listen to what your master is saying!.

Commentary : The Shariah has clarified the rulings of marriage between the man and the woman and has explained the rulings of the husband's accusation of his wife for committing adultery without evidence and the consequent practice of Li‘ān, besides other rulings of separation, to protect lineages, repel shame from the spouses, ward off the legally prescribed punishment of Qadhf (false accusation of adultery), and prevent strife and bloodshed.
In this Hadīth, Abu Hurayrah (may Allah be pleased with him) reports that Sa‘d ibn ‘Ubādah al-Ansāri (may Allah be pleased with him) came to the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) when the following verse was revealed: {As for those who accuse chaste women [of adultery] but fail to produce four witnesses.} [Surat an-Nūr: 4], as mentioned in Musnad Ahmad Collection from the Hadīth of ‘Abdullah ibn ‘Abbās (may Allah be pleased with him and his father), and he said: "O Messenger of Allah, what if," i.e., tell me and inform me what is the ruling? "A man finds his wife with another man, should he kill him?" That is to say, and the killer would, thus, be killed by way of legal retribution, or should he go bring four witnesses and he would, thus, escape after fulfilling his need? The Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) said: "No," i.e., he should not be killed; rather, witnesses should be brought, and the legally prescribed punishment should be inflicted on him; otherwise, the one who is drunk, angry, or jealous would dare to kill then claim that his wife was committing adultery and chaos would, thus, prevail. Sa‘d said: "Yes" and he swore to the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) by the God Who honored and privileged him by sending him with the truth and the Shariah that whoever sees this happening to his wife will be overcome by anger and jealousy and will, thus, strike him with the sword. This was not meant as an objection to the Prophet's words; rather, it was said out of jealousy and seeking the concession to kill the adulterer when caught red-handed. Thereupon, the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) said in wonder: "Listen to what your master is saying!" Master: the chief and leader, as Sa‘d was the master of the Khazraj from the Ansār. This means: Look at his jealousy! The end of Muslim's version reads: "Indeed, he is jealous, and I am more jealous than he is, and Allah is more jealous than I am," i.e., the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) lauded Sa‘d's feeling of jealousy and clarified that it is from the attributes of the honorable and the eminent. The explanation of the jealousy of Allah Almighty was mentioned in the two Sahīh Collections: "The jealousy of Allah is when the believer commits what Allah has prohibited."
Despite the great significance of this matter - a man seeing his wife with a strange man - and its gravity, a Muslim is required to abide by the commands of Allah Almighty and His prohibitions, even if they contradict his opinion and personal desires. Had this matter been left to the likes of what Sa‘d had said, the consequent evil would have been much graver and it would have paved the way for false accusations and other evil consequences.
The Hadīth shows that jealousy and chivalry must not prevent one from carrying out Allah's commands and executing His prescribed punishments.
It points out the necessity of having witnesses in adultery cases..

1502
Abu Hurayrah reported that the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) said about the slave whose ownership is shared between two men and one of them emancipates him, he said: He should guarantee..

Commentary : The Shariah has protected all rights including the partners' rights. It has forbidden any kind of offense practiced by one partner against the other. This Hadīth clarifies that when two people own a slave jointly and one of them emancipates his share of that slave, this entails emancipating the rest of the slave. When the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) said: "He should guarantee," it meant that the emancipator should guarantee his partner's share of the slave whom he emancipated, i.e., he is financially responsible for securing the complete freedom of that slave. In the Two Sahīh Collections: "But if he has no money, the slave will be required to work to pay for his freedom, but must not be overburdened." So, it made it clear that if the emancipator is poor and has no money to free the rest of the slave, he remains in slavery and is required to work for his freedom and to pay for the share of the partner who did not emancipate him. However, he should not be assigned tasks that are hard for him or beyond his ability..