| 2 Hadiths


Hadith
1446
Narrated Umm ‘Attiyyah (may Allah be pleased with her): A sheep was sent to me (in charity) and I sent some of it to `Aishah (may Allah be pleased with her). The Prophetﷺ asked `Aishah for something to eat. `Aisha replied that there was nothing except what Nusaybah Al-Ansaariyyah had sent of that sheep. The Prophet ﷺ said to her, "Bring it as it has reached its place.".

Commentary : One of the special characteristics that the Prophet ﷺand his noble family had was that they would eat from food that was offered as a gift, and not from what was given as alms.
In this hadeeth, Umm ʿAṭṭiyyah al-Ansaariyyah- whose name is Nusaybah - reports that a sheep was sent as a form of charity to her. The sender was the Prophet ﷺ as mentioned in a narration reported in Saheeh Muslim, where said: “The Messenger of Allah ﷺ sent me a sheep from the alms. I sent some of it to A’ishah”, meaning: as a gift to her, and not as alms. So, when the Messenger of Allah ﷺ came to ‘A’ishah (may Allah be pleased with her) and asked her about the food, she said: ‘No, it was nothing except what Nusaybah had sent from this sheep.’ To which, he ﷺresponded, ‘Bring it here; for it has reached its proper place.’ Then, he ﷺ explained that when it was charity, it was permissible for her to dispose of it to the poor by way of sale or gift; for the validity of it being in his possession [could be established.] So, when Nusaybah (may Allah be pleased with her) gifted it to ‘A’ishah (may Allah be pleased with her) some of the sheep - it was judged for her with the ruling of a gift. Thus, It shifted from the meaning of charity from being in the possession of the giver, and transferred to the meaning of a lawful gift for the Prophet ﷺ.
He ﷺ would only eat what came as a gift, and not what was offered as charity, as a form of honour and etiquette because gifts bring hearts closer and make people love each other, and it is permissible to be rewarded the sender of the gift with something similar or better than it so that no one has favour over the other and no one feels humiliated. All this is not possible with charity, because it is the filth of the people in which they purge the wealth of its impurity.
One benefit that we can conclude from this hadeeth is it shows that things that are forbidden for known reasons become lawfulif those reasons are removed..

1448
Narrated Anas (may Allah be pleased with him): Abu Bakr (may Allah be pleased with him) wrote to me what Allah had instructed His Messenger ﷺ to do regarding the one who had to pay one Bint Makhaad (i.e., one year-old she-camel) as Zakat, and he did not have it but had gotten a Bint Laboon (two-year-old she-camel). He wrote that it could be accepted from him as Zakat, and the collector of Zakat would return him 20 Dirhams or two sheep; and if the Zakat payer had not a Bint Makhaad, but he had Ibn Laboon (a two-year-old he-camel) then it could be accepted as his Zakat, but he would not be paid anything .

Commentary : Zakat is one of the five pillars of Islam that Allah has dictated upon those whose savings exceed the specified threshold. It is taken from the wealthy and given to the poor (i.e., all those who are eligible to receive it according to the Quran). Allah and His Messenger ﷺ explained all the rulings and details pertaining to this obligatory act of worship to protect the wealthy ones from injustice and protect the rights of those who are in need.
In this hadeeth, Anas ibn Maalik (may Allah be pleased with him) reports that Abu Bakr (may Allah be pleased with him) wrote him a letter in which he explained the due zakat on livestock that Allah has ordered His Messenger ﷺ to take. This letter was penned when Anas was appointed to collect the zakat from people in al-Bahrayn, which is a region that includes today the kingdom of Bahrain as well as Al-Ihsaa’ and al-Qateef in the eastern parts of Saudi Arabia. The letter explained that for every 25-35 camels, the zakat collector should take one she-camel that has completed the age of one lunar year. If no she-camel that meets this criterial is available, then a she-camel that has competed the age of two lunar years instead and pay the zakat payer 20 Dirhams of pure silver or two sheep, aged between two to three years to make up the age difference between the camels. The reason 20 Dirhams or two sheep were specified is to avert any possible disputes between people.
(If the Zakat payer had not a Bint Makhaad): This could mean either that the zakat payer (i) does not have one at all, (ii) does not have one that is not sick since sickness disqualifies the she-camel, (iii) or does not have an average she-camel to give, and only has a top-notch she camel i.e., the zakat payer is not obliged to give a top-notch she-camel. If any of the aforementioned three scenarios happened, the zakat payer is allowed to give, in lieu, a he-camel that completed the age of two years even if its value is lower without having to pay the difference in value.  
From the benefits of this hadeeth is learning that it is permissible to take zakat in a form other than silver and gold. This is obvious in the statement: “the collector of Zakat would return him 20 Dirhams or two sheep” because the two sheep are non-monetary items.
It shows that Islam is a religion that is well structured and organised in all its legislations and rulings, and it treats people with justice and never transgresses the rights of others. .

1450
Narrated Anas (may Allah be pleased with him) that Abu Bakr (may Allah be pleased with him) wrote for him, zakat regulations which Allah's Messenger ﷺ had made compulsory, and wrote that one should neither collect various portions (of the livestock) nor divide the livestock into various portions in order to avoid paying zakat..

Commentary : Zakat is one of the five pillars of Islam that Allah has dictated upon those whose savings exceed the specified threshold. It is taken from the wealthy and given to the poor (i.e., all those who are eligible to receive it according to the Quran). Allah and His Messenger explained all the rulings and details pertaining to this obligatory act of worship to protect the wealthy ones from injustice and protect the rights of those who are in need.
In this hadeeth, Anas ibn Maalik (may Allah be pleased with him) reports that Abu Bakr (may Allah be pleased with him) wrote him a letter in which he explained the due zakat on livestock that Allah’s Messenger made compulsory upon Muslims. This letter was penned after Abu Bakr appointed Anas to collect the zakat from the people in al-Bahrayn, which is a region that includes, today, the kingdom of Bahrain, as well as Al-Ihsaa and al-Qateef in the eastern parts of Saudi Arabia.
It is possible that the meaning of this part of the letter is that it is impermissible for livestock owners to combine their livestock into one group to evade the zakat or reduce the due zakat. The example of this is three persons that each one of them has 40 sheep. As they know that each one will have to pay one sheep, they agreed to put their sheep together so they can only give one sheep instead of three. This is because a person who has 40 to 120 sheep gives only one sheep. Likewise, it is not permissible to divide the livestock into various portions in order to avoid paying zakat. The example of this is two partners that have 200 sheep, on which it is obligatory to pay 3 sheep. However, to reduce the zakat, they divide the sheep between them so that each one takes 100 sheep and thus be required to pay one sheep. This is also not allowed because it is a trick intended to reduce the zakat.
It is also possible that this statement is intended to instruct the zakat collector not to combine the property of different people in one group to make the total of which meet the minimum on which zakat is payable and thus take zakat from them. Likewise, it instructs him not to divide the property of partners to calculate the zakat on each one individually to increase the zakat. 
As it can be noted, the instruction mentioned in this hadeeth is meant to address both the zakat collector and property owners. Neither the zakat collector should fear that the zakat he is collecting will decrease nor the property owner should fear that his zakat is increased.
From the benefits of this hadeeth is that it shows the impermissibility of resorting to tricks to evade paying the zakat or to take it from those whose property does not meet the conditions of zakat. 
This hadeeth shows that those who play tricks to avoid an obligation should be treated according to the opposite of his intent.
It shows that partnership in livestock is permissible, and that from the purposes of religion is to have the orders of Allah executed and His obligations are fulfilled, and not working to increase the collected zakat.
It shows that Islam is a religion that is well structured and organised in all its legislations and rulings, and it treats people with justice and never transgresses the rights of others.

1451
Narrated Anas (may Allah be pleased with him): Abu Bakr (may Allah be pleased with him) wrote to me what Allah's Messenger ﷺ has made compulsory regarding zakat. It reads: If the property of two persons is mixed, but they are not partners, its zakat is to be paid as a whole, and then they can settle the differences. .

Commentary : Zakat is one of the five pillars of Islam that Allah has dictated upon those whose savings exceed the specified threshold. It is taken from the wealthy and given to the poor (i.e., all those who are eligible to receive it according to the Quran). Allah and His Messenger explained all the rulings and details pertaining to this obligatory act of worship to protect the wealthy ones from injustice and protect the rights of those who are in need.
In this hadeeth, Anas ibn Maalik (may Allah be pleased with him) reports that Abu Bakr (may Allah be pleased with him) wrote him a letter in which he explained the due zakat on livestock that Allah’s Messenger made compulsory upon Muslims. This letter was penned after Abu Bakr appointed Anas to collect the zakat from the people in al-Bahrayn, which is a region that includes, today, the kingdom of Bahrain, as well as Al-Ihsaa and al-Qateef in the eastern parts of Saudi Arabia.
In this part of the letter, Abu Bakr explains how partners pay the zakat on their joint property, whether the share of each partner is from the same kind as fruits and grains, or livestock like camels, cows, and sheep. The zakat collector should take the due zakat from the total without considering the share of each partner. If two persons, each one of them has his own livestock, but they share the same pasture where they let their livestock gaze together, and both help each other in managing them. However, none of them relinquishes his ownership of the livestock and each one is able to recognize his own livestock. In this case, the zakat collector will consider the total number of heads regardless of the fact that they are two separate ownerships. Then, the zakat of which will be calculated based on the total, and each one of them will give only what is due on his own livestock. For example, if the total number of heads is 123 sheep, and two third of which are owned by X and one third is owned by Y, the zakat collector will take only one sheep based on the total number of heads. Afterwards, X and Y should reconcile the accounts. In this case, Y should pay X the value of the extra one third he paid. If the subjects of zakat were grains, fruits and the like, then Y should give X the extra one third in grain and fruits.
This hadeeth shows that persons who mix their belongings and property are treated as partners i.e., their property are treated as one property and the zakat will be calculated according to the total of it. After the zakat is taken, they can settle their accounts.
This hadeeth shows that it is permissible for people to let their livestock mix and gaze in a shared pasture.
It highlights the importance of zakat and the keen interest of the Prophet ﷺ to explain its rulings in detail..

1452
Narrated Aboo Sa’eed al-Khudree (may Allah be pleased with him): A Nomad asked Allah's Messenger ﷺ about the emigration. The Prophet ﷺ said, "May Allah have mercy on you! The matter of emigration is very hard. Have you got camels? Do you pay their Zakat?" The Arab nomad said, "Yes, I have camels and I pay their Zakat." The Prophet ﷺ said, Work beyond the villages and towns, and Allah will not decrease (waste) any of your good deeds.".

Commentary : At the beginning of Islam, it was obligatory upon Muslims to emigrate to al-Madeenah to flee the lands of disbelief, protect their religion, and support the Prophet ﷺ and spread the message of Islam. The best of believers were those who emigrated to him ﷺ and fulfilled the rights of emigration. However, there were some Muslims who could not emigrate due to valid excuses; therefore, Allah facilitated for them another path for good deeds.
In this hadeeth, Aboo Sa’eed al-Khudree (may Allah be pleased with him) reports that a nomad, which is the term used to refer to Arabs who lived in deserts, asked the Prophet ﷺ to give him the pledge to emigrate to al-Madeenah i.e., to leave his family and homeland and relocate to al-Madeenah to be in the company of the Prophet ﷺ. However, the Prophet ﷺ feared that he would not manage or be able to fulfill its rights; thus, gives it up. For this reason, he ﷺ said to him: “Wayhak” (lit. woe to you), an Arabic phrase used to show compassion and concern for the addressee and explained to him that fulfilling the rights of emigration is too difficult and only a few can fulfill them. It seems the Prophet ﷺ could notice the inability of the man to handle it; thus, he declined his request. Then, he ﷺ asked him if he had any camels that he pays its zakat. The man’s answer was positive and upon which the Prophet ﷺ guided him to do good deeds in his homeland for wherever he would be, his good deeds would benefit him and his reward would not be decreased. It is as if the Prophet ﷺ wanted to say to him: It does not matter where you reside so long as you are fulfilling the obligation that Allah imposed upon you and your family. Allah will not decrease the reward of your good deeds, regardless of your residence.
It has been said that this incident occurred after the conquest of Makkah on which he ﷺ said: “there is no emigration after the conquest [of Makkah].” It was said that emigration was only obligatory upon the Muslims who lived in Makkah. As for the Muslims living in other areas, it was only recommended and liked. It was said: Emigration was obligatory upon the Muslims who lived in rural areas and not upon the people of the desert. It was said that emigration was only obligatory if some of the residents of the town entered Islam while the rest remained on their disbelief. This is so that the Muslims would not be subject to the rulings pertaining to disbelievers. If everyone in the town entered Islam, then emigration is no longer obligatory.
This hadeeth highlights the merit of emigration and emigrants, and shows the virtue of paying zakat on camels and the hastening to do good deeds..

1454
Narrated Anas (may Allah be pleased with him): When Aboo Bakr (may Allah be pleased with him) sent me to (collect the Zakat from) al-Bahrayn, he wrote to me the following: “By the Name of Allah, the Beneficent, the Merciful. These are the orders for compulsory alms (Zakat) which Allah's Messenger ﷺ had made obligatory for every Muslim, and which Allah had ordered His Messenger to observe: Whoever amongst the Muslims is asked to pay Zakat accordingly, he should pay it (to the Zakat collector) and whoever is asked more than that (what is specified in this order) he should not pay it; for twenty-four camels or less, one ewe is to be paid as Zakat; for every five camels, one sheep is to be paid, and if there are between twenty-five to thirty-five camels, a one year old she-camel (Bint Makhaad) is to be paid; and if they are between thirty-six to forty-five (camels), one two-years old she-camel (Bint Laboon) is to be paid; and if they are between forty-six to sixty (camels), one three years old she-camel (Hiqqah) is to be paid; and if the number is between sixty-one to seventy-five (camels), one four-years old she-camel (Jadha’ah) is to be paid; and if the number is between seventy-six to ninety (camels), two she-camels aged 2 years (Bint Laboons) are to be paid; and if they are from ninety-one to one-hundred and twenty (camels), two three years old she-camel (Hiqqahs) are to be paid; and if they are over one-hundred and-twenty (camels), for every forty (over one-hundred-and-twenty) one two years she-came (Bint Laboon) is to be paid, and for every fifty camels (over one-hundred-and-twenty) one three years  she-camel (Hiqqah) is to be paid; and whoever has got only four camels, has to pay nothing as Zakat, but if the owner of these four camels wants to give something, he can. If the number of camels increases to five, the owner has to pay one sheep as Zakat. As regards the Zakat for the (flock) of sheep; if they are between forty and one-hundred-and-twenty sheep, one sheep is to be paid; and if they are between one-hundred-and-twenty to two hundred (sheep), two sheep are to be paid; and if they are between two-hundred to three-hundred (sheep), three sheep are to be paid; and for over three-hundred sheep, for every extra hundred sheep, one sheep is to be paid as Zakat. And if somebody has got less than forty sheep, no Zakat is required, but if he wants to give, he can. For silver, the Zakat is one-fortieth of the lot (i.e. 2.5%), and if it is less than one-hundred Dirhams, Zakat is not required, but if the owner wants to pay, he can.'..

Commentary : Zakat is one of the five pillars of Islam that Allah has dictated upon those whose savings exceed the specified threshold. It is taken from the wealthy and given to the poor (i.e., all those who are eligible to receive it according to the Quran). Allah and His Messenger explained all the rulings and details pertaining to this obligatory act of worship to protect the wealthy ones from injustice and protect the rights of those who are in need.
In this hadeeth, Anas ibn Maalik (may Allah be pleased with him) reports that Abu Bakr (may Allah be pleased with him) wrote him a letter in which he explained the due zakat on livestock that Allah’s Messenger made compulsory upon Muslims. This letter was penned after Abu Bakr appointed Anas ibn Maalik (may Allah be pleased with him) to collect the zakat from the people in al-Bahrayn, which is a region that includes, today, the kingdom of Bahrain as well as Al-Ihsaa and al-Qateef in the eastern parts of Saudi Arabia. The reason Aboo Bakr penned this letter to Anas (may Allah be pleased with them) is to use it as reference and consult to calculate the zakat [on livestock] and identify those who are obliged to pay it.
He started the letter with the Basmalah and then explained that the obligatory alms (zakat) are that which the Messenger of Allah ﷺ made obligatory for Muslims and which Allah has ordered His Messenger to collect from the Muslims whose savings exceed a set threshold. This prelude was necessary to clarify that the calculations mentioned afterwards in the letter are not of Aboo Bakr. He explained to Anas from whom he should take zakat and that if the zakat demanded, he should pay it, and whoever is demanded to pay more than the required zakat, then they are not obliged to pay that which is above the zakat, and they may decline the request. The calculation of zakat, according to this letter, is as follows:
Camels:(i) From 5 to 24, one ewe on every five camels;(ii) from 25 to 35, one she-camel that completed one year in age, or in its absence one, one she-camel that completed two years in age and has not yet completed three years in age and in this case the zakat collector should pay the zakat payer 20 dirhams or two sheep to compensate him for the difference. In the event where the zakat payer has no she-camel that completed two years in age and has not yet completed three years but has instead a male-camel who completed 2 years in age and did not complete 3 years in age as yet, the zakat collector should take it without taking anything else from the zakat payer, according to the report recorded in Saheeh al-Bukhaaree; (iii) from 36 to 45, the zakat is one she-camel that completed the age of two years i.e., this she-camel is called in Arabic Bint Laboon (lit. daughter of a milky camel) and the reason it is called as such is that its mother gave birth to more than one thus it started to have milk. As for the male-camel, he is referred to as Ibn Laboon;(iv) from 46 to 60, one she-camel that completed the age of three years and it is called in Arabic Hiqqah because by this age it can be mounted, carry luggage, and is capable of mating; (v) from 61 to 75, one she-camel that completed four years in age and it is called in Arabic Jadh’ah because of the falling of her milk teeth, (vi) from 76 to 90, two she-camels that completed the age of two years, (vii) from 91 to 120: two she-camels that completed the age of threeyears (viii) and over 120, the zakat is one she-camel that completed the age of three years on every forty camels and one three-year-old on every fifty camels i.e., for 121 to 129, three she-camels aged two years, and for 130 to 139, one she-camel aged three years and two she-camels aged two years, for 140 to 149, two she-camels aged three years and one she-camel aged two years, for 150-159, three she-camels aged three years, for 160 to 169, four she-camels aged two years, for 170 to 179, three she-camels aged two years and one she-camel aged three years, for 180-189, two she-camels aged two years and two she-camels aged three years, for 190-199, three she-camels aged three years and one she-camel aged two years, for 200 to 209, four she-camels aged three years or five she-camels aged two years, and so forth. The same calculation is used for whatever is more than 209, so as the zakat on each fifty camels will be one she-camel aged three years, and on each forty camels will be one she-camel aged two years.
The letter specifies the zakat due on camels if they are less than 24. If the number is less than five, there is no zakat due, and if the number is five, the zakat is only one sheep, and so forth until the number reaches 24 as explained above.
Sheep: Below 40 sheep, there is no zakat. From 40 to 120, one ewe, from 121 to 200, two ewes, from 200 to 300, three ewes and over 300, one ewe on every hundred sheep.

Zakat on livestock is only limited to animals that gaze for the most part of the year. As for the livestock that are foddered are not eligible for the zakat mentioned in the above calculations. They are subject to zakat according to the calculations made for property and merchandises. There is no zakat on sheep if they are less than forty heads except their owner wishes to pay zakat on them voluntarily.
Silver: Zakat is obligatory on silver, and it is given by paying 2.5 %, i.e., a quarter of a tenth, if it reaches the set threshold, which is about 295 grams [and one lunar year has passed over possessing it]. The threshold of silver is mentioned in the part of the letter where it reads: “For silver, the Zakat is one-fortieth of the lot (i.e., 2.5%), and if its value is less than two-hundred Dirhams, Zakat is not required, but if the owner wants to pay, he can.” The part where it says, “if it is less than one-hundred Dirhams, Zakat is not required,” may give the impression that if it is above 190 and less than 200 Dirhams, zakat is required. However, this is a wrong assumption, because 190 is specifically mentioned since the number is counted in tens, and 200 is the following count; thus, it was mentioned to indicate that no zakat is required if it is less than 200 Dirhams. This is supported by the hadeeth recorded in Saheeh al-Bukhaaree and Saheeh Muslim on the authority of Aboo Sa’eed al-Khudree (may Allah be pleased with him) that the Prophet ﷺ said: “There is no zakat to pay on less than five awaaq (plural of Uwqiyyah) of silver, but the owner wants to pay, he can.” And it is known that one Uwqiyyah equals forty Dirhams.
The intended meaning of the part “but the owner wants to pay, he can” is that the owner can voluntarily give away part of it as he is not required to do so, and in this case, it will be accepted and taken from him. This indicates that if the owner wants willingly and happily to give more and better than what he is required to pay, it will be accepted and taken from him.
From the benefits of this hadeeth are learning the zakat payable on camels, sheep, and silver, and that zakat on tangible property to be paid to the Imaam (i.e. ruler of Muslims).
The hadeeth shows that Islam is a religion that is well-structured and systemised in its rulings and obligations. It does not oppress or does injustice to anyone and does not transgress the rights of others.
It highlights the significance of zakat in Islam and the keen interest of the Prophet ﷺ to give a detailed account of its rulings, and it shows that zakat is not waived on the number of livestock that falls between each two thresholds..

1455
Narrated Anas (may Allah be pleased with him): Abu Bakr (may Allah be pleased with him) wrote to me what Allah's Messenger ﷺ has made compulsory regarding zakat. It reads: Neither an old nor a one-eyed animal, nor a ram may be taken as Zakat except if the Zakat collector wishes (to take it)..

Commentary : Zakat is one of the obligations that Allah has imposed upon those whose savings exceed the specified threshold. It is taken from the wealthy and given to the poor (i.e., all those who are eligible to receive it according to the Quran). Allah and His Messenger ﷺexplained all the rulings and details pertaining to this obligatory act of worship to protect the wealthy ones from injustice and protect the rights of those who are in need.
In this hadeeth, Anas ibn Maalik (may Allah be pleased with him) reports that Abu Bakr (may Allah be pleased with him) wrote him a letter in which he explained the due zakat on livestock that Allah’s Messenger made compulsory upon Muslims. This letter was penned after Abu Bakr delegated Anas ibn Maalik (may Allah be pleased with them) to collect the zakat from the people in al-Bahrayn, which is a region that includes, today, the kingdom of Bahrain as well as Al-Ihsaa and al-Qateef in the eastern parts of Saudi Arabia.
According to this letter - as it is mentioned in this hadeeth – the following type of sheep cannot be accepted as zakat: (i) old sheep whose teeth has fallen, (ii) sheep whose one of its eyes is blind, (iii) sheep that have health problems and defects that would disqualify it as a sacrificial animal (i.e., Udhiyyah) such as limping, fatigue or sick sheep, (iv) rams (i.e., male-sheep and male-goats) except of the zakat collector agrees to take it because of it has much meat or fat.
This hadeeth states that it is impermissible to take out defected or undesired property as zakat, and that the zakat collector has the authority to accept or decline zakat that does not meet the criteria that religion has specified. .

1456
Narrated Abu Hurayrah (may Allah be pleased with him): Abu Bakr (may Allah be pleased with him) said, "By Allah! If they (pay me the Zakat and) withhold even a young (female) goat which they used to pay during the lifetime of Allah's Messenger ﷺ, I will fight with them for it." `Umar (may Allah be pleased with him) said, "It was nothing but Allah Who opened Abu Bakr's heart towards the decision to fight, and I came to know that his decision was right.".

Commentary : The Imaam (ruler) and Caliph is the one responsible for managing the affairs of the Muslim nation, including the collection of zakat. Not only has he the authority to force people to pay their zakat, but also to fight with those who refuse to pay it.
This hadeeth is a part of a long story that is mentioned in another hadeeth wherein Abu Hurayrah (may Allah be pleased with him) reports that after the passing of the Prophet ﷺ and Abu Bakr (may Allah be pleased with him) assuming the position of the Caliph of Muslims, some Arabs apostatized and others refused to pay the zakat. Following those events, Abu Bakr (may Allah be pleased with him) decided to dispatch military campaigns to fight with them and force them to pay the zakat. However, ‘Umar ibn al-Khataab (may Allah be pleased with him) felt uneasy about it and could not entertain the idea of fighting and shedding the blood of people who testify that there is no god worthy of worship. So, he said to Abu Bakr: 'O Abu Bakr, how can you fight the people when the Messenger of Allah ﷺ said: I have been commanded to fight the people until they say (there is none worthy of worship except Allah). Whoever says it, his life and his property are safe from me, except for its right, and their reckoning will be with Allah?' However, Abu Bakr (may Allah be pleased with him) informed him that they have to pay the zakat and that it is as obligatory as the [five daily] prayers. He explained to ‘Umar that they have to fulfill the obligation of zakat and denying it is akin to denying the five daily prayers. He (may Allah be pleased with him) said: “I will surely fight those who separate prayer and zakat, for zakat is what is due on wealth.” Then, he swore by Allah that if anyone withholds from him a small-she-goat that they used to give to the Messenger of Allah ﷺ he will fight them. In a different version of the hadeeth, it reads a robe instead of a she-goat, which he said it to signify the seriousness of the matter. He wanted to make it clear that he would fight whoever withholds anything, regardless how trivial it is, they used to pay to the Prophet ﷺ. This is because the obligation of zakat is from what is known from Islam by necessity, and whoever denies or rejects something known from Islam by necessity will be fought. Zakat is a right due on wealth and refusing to pay it means denying one of the fundamental rights of Islam. If a person refuses to pay it, he should be fought just like how a person who denies the five daily prayers should be fought. Upon hearing the justification of Abu Bakr (may Allah be pleased with him), ‘Umar became convinced and supported his decision of fighting them, and that it is the correct ruling that is established in the Quran and the Sunnah.
This hadeeth highlights the sound judgment and understanding of Abu Bakr (may Allah be pleased with him), and his courage and firmness in the truth, and the objectivity of ‘Umar (may Alah be pleased with him) and his aptness to accept the truth once he knows it..

1460
Narrated Abu Dhar (may Allah be pleased with him): I went to the Prophet ﷺ and he said: “By Allah in Whose Hands my life is (or probably said, 'By Allah, except Whom none has the right to be worshipped) If any man has camels, cattle, or sheep on which he does not pay what is due, they will be produced as large and fat as can be on the Day of Resurrection and will trample him with their hoofs and gore him with their horns. As often as the last of them pass him the first of them will be brought back to him until judgment is pronounced among mankind.”.

Commentary : Zakat is one of the obligations that Allah has imposed upon those whose savings exceed the specified threshold. It is taken from the wealthy and given to the poor (i.e., all those who are eligible to receive it according to the Quran). Whoever thanks Allah, Exalted be He, by fulfilling this obligation and paying his zakat to those who deserve it will be given a reward that is complete; and whoever fails to fulfill this obligation will earn nothing but loss and failure in this life and the Hereafter.
In this hadeeth, Abu Dhar (may Allah be pleased with him) reports that he visited the Prophet ﷺ one day, and he heard him ﷺ swears by Allah, Exalted be He, the One in His Hand all souls, or, 'by Allah, except Whom none has the right to be worshipped’ that whoever does not pay zakat on livestock (such as camels, cows, and sheep), they will be produced as large and fat as can be on the Day of Resurrection, because the condition of cattle varies i.e., they could be fat, fatigue, small or large, and then those with hoofs (i.e., camels) will trample him and those with horns will gore him to cause his as much pain as possible. They will be subject to this punishment while the creation is standing in the land of resurrection, and it will continue until the reckoning of the people is over.
From the benefits of this hadeeth is that not thanking Allah’s blessings and failing to fulfill His right in them will make us subject to punishment and hardship on the Day of Judgment.
The hadeeth indicates that Allah, Exalted be He, will resurrect the camels, cows and sheep whose zakat was withheld to punish their owners with them.
It shows the great punishment that is made for those who withhold zakat, and that some sinners will be subject to a special punishment on the Day of Judgment before the reckoning of the people is over..

1461
Narrated Anas in Maalik (may Allah be pleased with him): "Abu Talhah (may Allah be pleased with him) had more property of date-palm trees gardens than any other amongst the Ansaar in al-Madeenah and the most beloved of them to him was Bayruhaa’ garden, which was in front of the Mosque of the Prophet ﷺ. Allah's Messenger ﷺ used to go there and used to drink from its fresh water." Anas added, "When these ayaat were revealed: --{By no means shall you attain righteousness unless You spend (in charity) of that which you love.} (Quran 3.92) Abu Talhah said to Allah's Messenger: 'O Allah's Messenger! Allah, the Blessed, the Superior says: {By no means shall you attain righteousness, unless you spend (in charity) of that which you love.} And no doubt, Bayruhaa’ garden is the most beloved of all my property to me. I want to give it in charity in Allah's Cause and I expect its reward from Allah. So, spend it wherever Allah makes you think it better.' The Prophet ﷺ  said, 'Well done! This is a profitable property. This is a profitable property. O Abu Talhah! I have heard what you have said, and I think it would be proper if you spend it on your Kith and kin.' Abu Talhah said, I will do so, O Allah's Messenger.' Then Abu Talhah distributed that garden amongst his relatives and his cousins." [According to the report from the route of] Yahya ibn Yahya and Isma’eel narrated from Maalik, it reads: property that brings about reward and benefits to its owner“..

Commentary : Giving away in charity money that is precious to the heart only for the pleasure of Allah is evidence on the sincerity of the person, the truthfulness of his faith, and a means to attain the good in this life and the Hereafter.
In this hadeeth, Anas ibn Maalik (may Allah be pleased with him) reports that Abu Talhah – whose name is Zayd ibn Sahl al-Ansaaree – (may Allah be pleased with him) was the wealthiest man amongst the Ansaar and he had plenty of date-palm trees. The most precious and beloved property to him was the Bayruhaa’ garden in al-Madeenah, opposite to the Mosque of the Prophet. The garden had a fresh water source that the Prophet ﷺ used to attend to drink from. Anas (may Allah be pleased with him) adds that after the ayah {By no means shall you attain righteousness unless You spend (in charity) of that which you love} was revealed, Abu Talhah (may Allah be pleased with him) went to the Prophet ﷺ and recited the ayah to him. Then, he explained that the most beloved property to his heart was the garden of Bayruhaa’ and that he is giving it away in charity for the sake of Allah while hoping for its reward and good outcome from Allah, Exalted be He, and that he is leaving the decision of where and how to spend it to the Prophet ﷺ so, he can do with it what Allah orders him. The Prophet ﷺ rejoiced and exclaimed his awe of the good initiative of Aboo Talhah, and informed him that this is indeed a profitable property [in terms of Allah’s reward]. In another version, it reads: property that brings about reward and benefits to its owner. It has been said, it means, property that gives its owner reward day and night.
The Prophet ﷺ instructed him to spend it on his relative so he divided it between them. The reason the Prophet ﷺ advised him to do so is that giving charity to relatives gives the person the reward of charity and the reward of joining kinship.
The meaning of the ayah: {By no means shall you attain righteousness unless You spend (in charity) of that which you love} is that you will not attain all the good or attain Allah’s mercy, pleasure, and Paradise until you spend from the money that you favour and love. This includes intangible forms of wealth such as using one’s social status to help people and exerting efforts to do good deeds and putting the life at the service of Allah.
This hadeeth directs us to consult the people of virtue and merit on how to give charity and do good deeds. It shows that a pious person may be described as wealthy or acknowledge his wealth without that being a defect in his piety.
It shows that when the value of charity is high the giver ought to be praised and highlights the merit of Abu Talhah (may Allah be pleased with him).
It shows that giving charity to close relatives who are in need is more rewarding and takes priority. .

1462
Narrated Aboo Sa’eed al-Khudree (may Allah be pleased with him): On `Eid al Fitr or `Eid al-Adha, Allah's Messenger ﷺ went out to the Musalla. After finishing the prayer, he ﷺ delivered the sermon and ordered the people to give alms. He said, "O people! Give alms." Then he ﷺ went towards the women and said: "O women! Give alms, for I have seen that the majority of the dwellers of Hell-Fire were you (women)." The women asked, "O Allah's Messenger! What is the reason for it?" He ﷺ replied, "O women! You curse frequently and are ungrateful to your husbands. I have not seen anyone more deficient in intelligence and religion who can make a cautious wise man irrational than you." Then he ﷺ left. When he ﷺ reached his house, Zaynab, the wife of Ibn Mas`ood, came and asked permission to enter. The Prophet ﷺ was informed of her visit so it was said, "O Allah's Messenger! It is Zaynab." He ﷺ asked, 'Which Zaynab?" The reply was that she was the wife of Ibn Mas'ood. He said, "Yes, allow her to enter." And she was admitted. Then she said, "O Prophet of Allah! Today you ordered people to give alms and I had an ornament and intended to give it as alms, but Ibn Mas`ood said that he and his children deserved it more than anybody else." The Prophet ﷺreplied, "Ibn Mas`ood had spoken the truth. Your husband and your children have more right to it than anybody else.".

Commentary : Zakat, which Allah has made obligatory, charity, which Allah has encouraged and made optional, are two great deeds that can help us attain safety in this life and the Hereafter. He who has indulged in sins and disobedience should give charity to purify himself from his sins, hoping from Allah, Exalted be He, His blessings and goodness. The Prophet ﷺ would encourage people so often to give charity and explain its virtue and who are most deserving of it.
In this hadeeth, Abu Sa’eed al-Khudree (may Allah be pleased with him) reports that the Prophet ﷺ went to the Musalla to offer the Eid prayer on ‘Eid al-Fitr or ‘Eid al-Adhah. The Musalla is a spacious outdoor area, and the location of the Musalla of the Prophet ﷺ was in a known area in al-Madeenah, that is 1000 arms away from the gate of his Mosque. After he ﷺ finished the ‘Eid prayer, he ﷺ addressed the attendees and preached to them about what would benefit them in their worldly life and the Hereafter. The preaching sermon should be short and not lengthy. He ﷺ exhorted to give in charity and then walked to the Musalla of women to exhort and preach them since they were segregated from men and may not have heard his first preach. Or, it is possible that he went to them to give them a special reminder. He reminded them of Paradise and Hellfire and addressed all of them in his speech by saying: O women! Then, he ﷺ ordered them to give away in charity, and explained that he saw during the ascending journey - or in other events – that most of the dwellers of Hellfire were from women. This makes the reason he ordered them to give away in charity is that giving charity increases the scale of good deeds and extinguishes the Lord’s anger. In other words, he ﷺ directed them to a good deed that would save them from Hellfire, hoping that Allah will have mercy on them because of their charity. The women asked the Prophet ﷺ about the reason that made them most of the people in Hellfire. He clarified that it is because of their excessive verbal abuse and cursing or invoking against others to be expelled from Allah’s mercy. The other reason he ﷺ offered was that women are often ungrateful to their husbands i.e., a woman would deny that her husband was ever kind to her whenever she is upset with him or sees from him something not of her liking even if it was a trivial matter. This part of the hadeeth sends women a strong warning against verbal abuse and cursing and warns them against denying the favors and kind treatment of their husbands. Then, he ﷺ described them of being deficient in intelligence and religion and that their influence is so strong such that it can even lure a resolve and sensible man. The latter is used in the form of exaggeration to highlight their strong influence over men to show that if they are determined to do something they would keep argue with men until they do it, regardless of it being right or wrong.
Their deficiency in intellect and religion is explained in the authentic hadeeth in Saheeh al-Bukhaaree, which reads:”They asked, “What is the deficiency of our religion and our intelligence, messenger of God?” He replied, “Is not the testimony of a woman equivalent to half the testimony of a man?” They said, “Yes.” Remarking that that pertained to the deficiency of her intelligence, he asked, “Is it not the case that when she menstruates, she neither prays nor fasts?” When they replied, “Yes,” he said, “That pertains to the deficiency of her religion.” The mention of their deficiency of religion and intellect is not to blame them, it is intended to warn men from falling for their temptations, and not as a derogatory remark or to blame them, because it is beyond their power and a part of their innate nature that Allah has created.
After, the Prophet ﷺ left to his house. Zaynab, the wife of ‘Abdullah ibn Mas’ood followed him to his house and asked his permission to enter. The one who informed the Prophet ﷺ of her visit and request to enter upon him was Bilaal ibn Rabaah (may Allah be pleased with him). He ﷺ allowed her to enter after he learned who she was. She informed him ﷺ that her husband, ‘Abdullah ibn Mas’ood (may Allah be pleased with him), objected when she wanted to giveaway in charity some of her jewelry, and explained that he and their children are more deserving of her charity. The Prophet ﷺ supported the view of Ibn Mas’ood and confirmed that her poor husband and children are more deserving of her charity. He ﷺ, according to the hadeeth recorded in Saheeh al-Bukhaaree and Saheeh Muslim, further added: “She will have two rewards, the reward for charity and the reward for upholding ties of kinship.”
From the benefits that we could learn from this hadeeth is knowing that cursing and ungratefulness between spouses are admonished.
It shows that the word “kufr” (translation: denying and ungratefulness) can be used to refer to sins that do not take people outside the fold of Islam to highlight its seriousness.
It teaches us that giving a harsh advice could be a way to rid of a quality that is condemned, and encourages us to give charity, particularly to poor and needy relatives, and that charity keeps us away from Allah’s punishment.
It shows that a student can discuss the opinion of his teacher about aspects that he does not understand.
It depicts to us the great character of the Prophet ﷺ, his tolerance, compassion, and kindness. .

1463
Narrated Aboo Hurayrah (may Allah be pleased with him): Allah's Messenger ﷺ said, "The Muslim does not have to pay zakat on his horse or slave.".

Commentary : Zakat is one of the obligations that Allah has imposed upon those whose savings exceed the specified threshold. It is taken from the wealthy and given to the poor (i.e., all those who are eligible to receive it according to the Quran). Allah, Exalted be He, and His Messenger ﷺ detailed all the rulings pertaining to this obligatory act of worship to protect the rights of the poor and needy and save the wealthy from injustice.
In this hadeeth, the Prophet ﷺ explains that horses and slaves are not subject to zakat, if horses are used for personal use to ride on them and slaves are for service. This means, if they were intended for trade then they will be subject to zakat if they reach the threshold, and one lunar year has passed over their possession. The same ruling applies to whatever property people have for their sole personal use, and not for savings or trade such as vehicles and equipment.
This hadeeth shows the mercy of Allah when He exempted His believing servants from paying zakat on horses and slaves..

1465
Narrated ‘Ataa’ ibn Yasaar: I heard Aboo Sa’eed al-Khudree (may Allah be pleased with him) say: “Once the Prophet ﷺ sat on a pulpit, and we sat around him. Then he ﷺ said, "The things I am afraid of most for your sake (concerning what will befall you after me) is the pleasures and flowers of the world and its beauties which will be made available to you." Somebody said, "O Allah's Messenger! Can the good bring forth evil?" The Prophet ﷺremained silent for a while. It was said to that person, "What is wrong with you? You are talking to the Prophet ﷺ while he is not talking to you." Then we noticed that he ﷺ was receiving revelation. Then the Prophet ﷺ wiped off his sweat and said, "Where is the questioner?" It seemed as if the Prophet ﷺ liked his question. Then he ﷺ said, "Good never brings forth evil. Indeed, it is like what grows in spring which either kills or makes the animals sick, except if an animal eats its full from the fresh vegetation and then faces the sun, and then defecates and urinates, and grazes again. No doubt this wealth is sweet and green. Blessed is the wealth of a Muslim from which he gives to the poor, the orphans and to needy travelers. (Or the Prophet said something similar to it) No doubt, whoever takes it illegally will be like the one who eats but is never satisfied, and his wealth will be a witness against him on the Day of Resurrection.".

Commentary : Allah has willed and predestined with His divine wisdom that this life be a place of tests and trials. Some people fall into its temptation and compete to attain its pleasures, while others realize its reality; thus, they endeavor to attain that which Allah has made for His believing servants in the Hereafter and never be misguided by worldly temptation.
In this hadeeth, Aboo Sa’eed al-Khudree (may Allah be pleased with him) reports that the Prophet ﷺ sat on the pulpit of his Mosque one day and his Companions gathered around him. He ﷺ then expressed his concern about his nation after this worldly life presents its pleasures and flower to them. The intended meaning of pleasures and beauty here is money and wealth, and he ﷺlikened wealth to flowers because flowers wilt and wither quickly to say that worldly pleasures change and wither quickly too.
One man asked the Messenger of Allah ﷺ how could that which is good brings forth or causes evil! The Prophet ﷺ remained silent for a while and his Companions realised that his silence was because of receiving revelation. After receiving the divine revelation, he ﷺ wiped the sweat of his face because whenever he received revelation, sweat would drop from his forehead. Then, he ﷺ asked about the questioner. It was as if he ﷺ approved the question and commended him for asking such a question. The Prophet ﷺ explained that the good do not bring forth evil – that is to say, when wealth is acquired from lawful sources and is managed and used as Allah orders, it will be considered from the kind of good that only bring forth nothing but goodness. The example of this is Islam; it is all good and brings forth nothing but good. However, there are other kinds of goodness that are not entirely good which could bring forth evil such as money. It is considered good, but it may bring forth evil if earned from unlawful sources or spent unwisely, etc. The same applies to all lawful work that is considered good but becomes evil when it is sought through forbidden means, or the money earned from it is unlawful.
Then, the Prophet ﷺ gave two examples to explain his statement and help his Companions understand how wealth is good, but it can bring forth evil as much as it can bring forth good. The first example was about the plants that grow in spring to explain how the good can turn into evil, and it has been said that spring here refers to the banks of a water-stream. He ﷺ said that what grows in spring or on the banks of a water-stream is good, but some of it still can cause great harm to the livestock that graze it, such as when a sheep consumes a large quantity of grains such that it causes its sickness. The meaning of this example is that it is harmful for a person to focus on acquiring as much wealth as possible to the extent it becomes all he cares about and then spends it in his own pleasure. It is the same as food and drinks; when one eats and drinks more than his need, it will make him feel unwell and comfortless. This example is addressing those who are keen on acquiring wealth and collecting money who withhold the rights of others his wealth (i.e., he does not pay zakat on it or use it to in lawful means). The reason of mentioning spring is that good plants and grass grow in it, which the livestock enjoy so much that they overeat and thus fall sick or causes their death.
The exception made in the example is about the livestock that only eat green plants moderately without exaggeration thus do not become sick because of it. This example is given to demonstrate the case of that which is good and only brings forth that which is good when dealt with appropriately. In this example, the Prophet ﷺ describes the case where livestock consume only good and fresh vegetations and that after they are full, they would roam around under the sunlight to benefit from the warmth. As a result, they would defecate easily, keeping the beneficial elements of the food and defecating that which is harmful. This example is given to describe the person who is moderate in his endeavours to collect and earn lawful money and use it for lawful causes.
Then, the Prophet ﷺ explains that money is desired and loved so much such that people are naturally keen on collecting it just like how we desire and like fruits and fresh vegetables that look nice and taste delicious. If a person pays zakat on his wealth, which he earns from lawful sources, and spends [some of] it on those who are poor and needy, orphans and wayfarers who do not have enough money during his journey, then his wealth will testify in his favour on the Day of Judgment. As for those who earned their wealth unlawfully, Allah will take away the barakah from it and deprive its owner from contentment so that he never feels he has enough even if he is given all the treasures of this world. He will be like a person who eats without ever being satiated, no matter how much food he consumes. On the Day of Judgment, the wealth of this kind of person will testify against him and expose his extravagance, unlawful spending, and strong keen on collecting it.
From the benefits of this hadeeth is learning that the Imaam sits on the pulpit while people sit around him listening to his preaching.
This hadeeth teaches us that we should give examples to clarify meanings so people can easily understand the intended message.
It shows that earning money from unlawful sources are devoid of Allah’s blessings and barakah, and the scholar should warn who listen to him about the temptation of money and similar temptations and explain to them how people may fall into such temptation.
It encourages us to be moderate in spending and collecting money, give away in charity, and avoid withholding our money from good causes.
It highlights that the Sunnah is a divinely inspired, and that one can object or blame someone for asking a question when feared that the question is inappropriate,.

1466
Narrated Zaynab, the wife of `Abdullah ibn Mas’ood, said, "I was in the Mosque and saw the Prophet ﷺ saying, 'O women! Give alms even from your ornaments.'" Zaynab used to provide for `Abdullah and those orphans who were under her protection. So, she said to `Abdullah, "Will you ask Allah's Messenger ﷺ whether it will be sufficient for me to spend part of the Zakat on you and the orphans who are under my protection?" He replied "Will you yourself ask Allah's Messenger ﷺ? Zaynab added: So, I went to the Prophet ﷺ and I saw there a woman from the Ansaar who was standing at the door (of the Prophet ﷺ with a similar problem as mine. Bilaal passed by us, and we asked him, 'Ask the Prophet ﷺ whether it is permissible for me to spend (the Zakat) on my husband and the orphans under my protection.' And we requested Bilaal not to inform the Prophet ﷺ about us. So, Bilaal went inside and asked the Prophet ﷺ regarding our problem. The Prophet ﷺ asked, "Who are those two?" Bilaal replied that she was Zaynab. The Prophet ﷺ said, "Which Zaynab?" Bilal said, "The wife of `Abdullah (ibn Mas`ood)." The Prophet ﷺ said, "Yes, (it is sufficient for her) and she will receive a double reward (for that): One for helping relatives, and the other for giving Zakat.".

Commentary : The Prophet ﷺ encouraged giving away in charity, explaining that the most rewarding type of charity is that which we give to our poor and needy relatives. This is because it reinforces solidarity and help those who are in need, let alone it fulfills the joining of kinship.
In this hadeeth, Zaynab the daughter of Mu’aawiyyah – or the daughter of Abee Mu’aawiyyah – the wife of ‘Abdullah ibn Mas’ood (may Allah be pleased with both of them) reports that she saw the Prophet ﷺ in the Mosque and heard him saying to the women: “give alms even from your ornaments” i.e., give away in charity if it was from the ornaments that you beautify yourselves with. At that time, Zaynab was spending on her husband, ‘Abdullah ibn Ma’sood and the orphans who were under her care.  It was said the orphans were her nephews i.e., the children of her brother and sister. She asked her husband, Abudllah ibn Mas’ood, to ask Allah’s Messenger ﷺ whether her spending on him, who was a poor man, and her relative orphans would suffice as a charity. However, ‘Abdullah ibn Mas’ood (may Allah be pleased with him) excused himself from this and asked her to ask the Prophet ﷺ directly. The reason he did not like to do it was because of his reverence to the Prophet ﷺ and it was said that asking such a question would make him look like as if he greedy, given the circumstances (i.e., she was spending on him) at that time.
So, she headed to the house of the Prophet ﷺ where she found a woman from the Ansaar waiting outside. The woman had the same inquiry about the charity given to relatives. It has been said that this woman was Zaynab, the wife of ‘Uqbah ibn ‘Amr al-Ansaaree, alias Aboo Mas’ood. She added that while they were outside, Bilaal passed by, so we asked him to pass her question to the Prophet ﷺ about whether spending on her husband and the orphans who were under her care is sufficient and accepted. It has been said that this spending refers to the obligatory spending while others said it refers to the optional spending. If it is the former, then it is understood to refer to that which is not binding upon the giver to give to his relatives. Then, she and the other woman asked not to disclose our names to the Prophet ﷺ i.e., do not say that so and so is asking such and such but rather say there are two women asking such and such. Or it is to say, do not disclose our names if he ﷺ inquired about them, which is not really intended literally since it is obligatory to answer the Prophet ﷺ if he ﷺ inquired about their identity. They only wanted to ensure they would avoid showing off or liked to exercise the best option. After, Bilaal (may Allah be pleased with him) entered upon the Prophet ﷺ and presented their question to him ﷺ. The Prophet ﷺ asked Bilaal about the name of both women and to which Bilaal (may Allah be pleased with him) said, they are named Zaynab. Thereupon, he ﷺ asked about their identity so Bilaal said that it was Zaynab, the wife of ‘Abdullah ibn Mas’ood (may Allah be pleased with him). He only mentioned one of them as he sufficed by mentioning the one who is older and more virtuous. According to the report mentioned in Sunan al-Nasaa’iee, the name of the other Zaynab was also mentioned, as it reads: Zaynab al-Ansaariyyah. Obviously, Bilaal clarified who they were because it is obligatory to answer the question of the Prophet ﷺ immediately. To which, the Prophet ﷺ explained that it is sufficient and that the wife may give charity to her husband and children, and as a result she will receive two rewards, one for joining kinship and one for charity.
From the benefits that can be concluded from this hadeeth is that spending on relatives and kinship is encouraged and gives us two rewards. It shows that it is permissible for the wife to give away in charity whatever she likes from her own property without the permission of her husband since women gave away in charity their earrings and jewellery.
It establishes the permissibility for the Imaam to preach to women and men speaking with foreign women when there is a valid need, and no temptation is anticipated. This is given based on the act that Bilaal conversed with the two Zaynabs while the Prophet ﷺ was aware of it and he ﷺ did not object..

1467
Narrated Umm Salamah (may Allah be pleased with her): I asked: "O Allah's Messenger ﷺ! Shall I receive a reward if I spend for the sustenance of Aboo Salamah's offspring, and in fact they are also my sons?" The Prophet ﷺ replied, "Spend on them and you will get a reward for what you spend on them.".

Commentary : The Prophet ﷺ encouraged giving away in charity, explaining that the most rewarding charity is that which we give to our poor and needy relatives. This is because it reinforces solidarity and help those who are in need, let alone it fulfills the joining of kinship.
In this hadeeth, the Mother of the Believers, Umm Salamah (may Allah be pleased with her), whose name is Hind bint Abee Umayyah, the wife of the Prophet ﷺ, asked the Prophet ﷺ whether she will be rewarded for spending on her children from Aboo Salamah ibn ‘Abd al-Asad who was her [first] husband and then died, and afterwards the Prophet ﷺ married her. Her children were, ‘Umar, Muhammad, Zaynab and Durrah; they were orphans without any source of income. She wanted to say that they are my children and I take care of their financial needs out of my compassion and feeling of responsibility towards them as their mother, not to mention they have more right in my charity than anyone else i.e., because they are orphans and needy, let alone her own children. She was concerned that she would not be rewarded for this good deed since it is driven by her feelings of motherhood. However, the Prophet ﷺ informed her that she will be rewarded for everything she would spend on them.
From the benefits of this hadeeth is that we are rewarded for spending on own children and others, even if this is what our innate nature necessitates. .

1510
Abu Hurayrah (may Allah be pleased with him) reported that the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) said: "No son can repay a father unless he finds him a slave and buys him and emancipates him." Another version reads: "No son can repay his father.".

Commentary : The right that children owe to their parents is great, and being dutiful to them in Islam is among the greatest means of drawing closer to Allah, as Allah has made dutifulness to them one of the broadest ways of reaching Paradise. Allah has also made not obeying them among the major sins and misdeeds that lead their perpetrators to disgracing punishment.
In this Hadīth, the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) clarifies that the child, whether male or female, cannot repay his father - the mother is included and so are the grandparents who are the same as the parents - and fulfill his right in full for his kindness towards him except when he finds his father a slave, buys him with his own money, and emancipates him and sets him free. In other words, the son seeks to reach him by buying him, and it is well known that he only buys him to free him from slavery, not to have him as his own slave or to be the master of his father. So, nothing fulfills the father's right over his son, no matter what the son does, except this act. This is because Islam came when slavery and serfdom were widespread and a common habit of the Arabs, and there were bondmaids and slaves in every house.
It was said: If a man took possession of his father, the latter would be free by mere possession and [there is] no need to say: I set him free. Similarly, if he took possession of his mother, she would be free by mere possession and [there is] no need to say: I set her free.
The Hadīth encourages children to be dutiful and kind to their parents.
It also denotes the merit of emancipating slaves..

1513
Abu Hurayrah reported: The Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) forbade the Hasāh sale (throwing pebble sale) and the Gharar sale (uncertainty sale)..

Commentary : During the pre-Islamic era of ignorance, there prevailed types of transactions that involved massive oppression and injustice. When Islam came, it established fair sales and forbade whatever involved oppression. Hence, it forbade what involved fraud and ambiguity to stop disagreement and dispute among people, which is one of the Shariah-approved objectives.
In this Hadīth, Abu Hurayrah (may Allah be pleased with him) narrates that the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) forbade the Hasāh sale, which was one of the sales practiced by the people of Jāhiliyyah. If the seller or the buyer threw a pebble, that would be a sign of finalizing the sale. It had three forms: First: The seller says to the buyer: I would sell you of these garments that on which the pebble I throw falls; or: I would sell you a piece of this land from here to the part that this pebble reaches. Second: Considering the act of throwing the pebble itself a sale by saying: If you throw the pebble at this garment, it will be sold to you at such-and-such. Third: Saying: You have the option to either accept or reject the sale until I throw this pebble. It was said: It means saying: Throw the pebble and whatever number comes out, I will be entitled to an equal number of dinars or dirhams. All these are forms of invalid sales that entail doing injustice to one of the two parties of the sale.
The Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) also forbade the Gharar sale. Gharar means danger, delusion, and deceit. This is a generalization after a specification, as it includes any sale that involves any kind of deceit, or that which is ambiguous or cannot be fulfilled. One of the rationales behind forbidding this sale is the fact that it is a waste of money, for one may not be able to get the sold item, which means that he spent his money in vain.
The Hadīth prohibits deception and fraud in sales.
It warns against consuming people's properties wrongfully.
It also points out that the object of a sale transaction must be something known and must have a known price..

1519
Abu Hurayrah (may Allah be pleased with him) reported that the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) said: Do not go out to meet what is being brought for trade. Whoever goes out to meet it and buys something thereof, when its master comes to the market, he will have the option..

Commentary : Selling and buying have rulings and etiquettes in Islam that a Muslim must adhere to fulfill justice in transactions and enjoy the pleasures of this worldly life and the Hereafter.
In this Hadīth, the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) forbids merchants from going out and receiving those people who transport commodities from one country to another. They must not receive them before arriving and being acquainted with the prices of commodities in such a country because this might harm the seller as they might buy from him at a lower price than its known price, which would result in harming the owner of the commodity by underestimating its price. Hence, the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) commanded the one who goes out to meet it and buys something thereof, and does not comply with the prohibition. So when "its master," i.e., the owner of the commodity, comes to the market, he will have the option either to effect the sale or take back his goods, for perhaps he did him injustice and wronged him regarding its price compared to its price in this country.
The Hadīth encourages truthfulness and transparency and the avoidance of deceit in commercial transactions.
It shows the Prophet's keenness on whatever brings goodness to his Ummah and his kindness towards them even when it comes to worldly interests..

1525
Ibn ‘Abbās reported that the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) said: Whoever buys food should not sell it until he measures it. I said to Ibn ‘Abbās: Why? He said: Do you not see them transacting with gold, whereas the food is deferred?.

Commentary : Allah Almighty has prescribed in sale what maintains people's rights, keeps them away from conflicts and quarrels, and repels harm from them.
In this Hadīth, the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) advises us saying that whoever buys food and wants to resell it, he "should not sell it" until he takes it after being measured and weighed. This is an indirect reference that the buyer should receive it and it becomes in his possession and knows its amount in a way that negates ambiguity. This is related to what is sold by measure as in this case, so it must be first measured until he receives it in full, then, he may sell it afterward. It is not lawful for him to sell it before measuring it, as it could be subject to excess or deficiency, which entails doing injustice and harm either to the seller or the buyer. Thereupon, Tāwūs ibn Kaysān - from the Tābi‘is - asked Ibn ‘Abbās (may Allah be pleased with him and his father): "Why?" i.e., why did the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) stipulate this condition? Ibn ‘Abbās (may Allah be pleased with him and his father) said: "Do you not see them transacting with gold, whereas the food is deferred?" In other words, the seller used to take the price in gold dinars, and then he would delay the delivery of food to the buyer. Therefore, the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) stipulated that the buyer should not resell it until he receives it and it becomes in his possession. Another Hadīth in the two Sahīh Collections clarified that what he meant by that is to transfer the food to another place or to the markets where it is sold in order not to be monopolized or manipulate its price. So, he made it clear that the right thing is to transfer it to the markets, which are known to people, where food is sold and to take possession of it, since Qabd (taking possession) is a condition, and transferring it as mentioned fulfills this condition.
Moreover, in the two Sahīh Collections, the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) forbade reselling the food after buying it until he receives it in full, i.e., he should not adopt any procedure or dispose of it by selling it again unless he first takes what he has purchased and it becomes in his full possession. Only then, he can resell it. This guarantees preventing any harm to the seller, the buyer, or the dwellers of this country that could result in disputes and conflicts between people and, thus, inflict harm upon them.
The Hadīth shows the Prophet's keenness on whatever brings goodness to his Ummah and his kindness towards them even when it comes to worldly interests.
It highlights the prohibition of adopting sale methods that lead to the monopoly of goods and the rise in prices, or that cause harm to the parties involved in the sale transaction..

1530
Jābir ibn ‘Abdullāh reported: The Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) forbade selling a heap of dried dates, whose measure is unknown, for a specified amount of dried dates..

Commentary : The rulings of sale transactions in Islam revolve around honesty and the absence of uncertainty among the parties involved in the sale. The sold item must be known to both parties, in terms of type, quantity, and quality, in such a way that removes any ambiguity. The Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) forbade certain kinds of sales that involve Jahālah (ambiguity), Gharar (uncertainty), and Riba (usury).
This Hadīth clarifies some of these forbidden kinds of sales. Jābir ibn ‘Abdullah (may Allah be pleased with him and his father) narrates that the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him): "Forbade selling a heap of dried dates, whose measure is unknown," "Subrah" (heap): food that is collected in a pile and whose weight and quantity are unknown. This applies to all types of food; however, he mentioned here one type in particular, namely the dried dates, because it is their staple food; otherwise, the mentioned prohibition includes all types of measured food. In Muslim's version, he did not mention his saying: "of dried dates" at the end of the Hadīth, which indicates the inclusion of all types of food sold without knowing its amount in exchange for a known amount of its like. "For a specified amount of dried dates," i.e., he forbade selling an unknown amount for a known amount of the same type, like dried dates for dried dates, wheat for wheat, and barley for barley, as this involves ambiguity regarding the unmeasured food from one aspect besides involving Riba al-Fadl (usury of surplus) from another aspect, bearing in mind that ignorance about the equality between the sold and purchased items is like knowing that there is a surplus between them, which is clear Riba. If the items subject to Riba rulings are the same, then, they must be the same in measure and hand to hand. However, if they are of different types, then, there is nothing wrong with the surplus between them like in the case of selling dried dates for wheat, or barley for corn, and the same applies to selling for cash, gold, or silver.
The Hadīth clarifies how the Shariah regulates the process of selling and buying to avoid the occurrence of disputes..

1536
Jābir reported: The Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) forbade leasing land and selling it ahead for years, and selling fruits before ripening..

Commentary : In the pre-Islamic era of ignorance, there prevailed types of sale that brimmed with oppression and injustice. When Islam came, it established fair sales and forbade everything involving oppression. Hence, it forbade cheating in sale transactions. Putting an end to disputes and conflicts between the seller and the buyer is one of the objectives of the Shariah.
In this Hadīth, Jābir ibn ‘Abdullah (may Allah be pleased with him and his father) reports that the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) forbade "leasing land", which is renting it. The forbidden lease is that which is in return for some of its produce, which means that the rent agreed upon between the owner and the lessee is an amount specified from the beginning of the fruits produced by this land, which may or may not produce this amount. In this case, the one who cultivates it will not be capable of fulfilling his contract. However, there is nothing wrong with leasing land in return for gold, silver, or cash, as in the two Sahīh Collections, Hanzhalah ibn Qays reported: "That he asked Rāfi‘ ibn Khadīj about leasing land, and he said: The Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) forbade leasing land. He said: I said: Even in return for gold and silver? He said: If it is in return for gold and silver, there is no harm in it." Also in the two Sahīh Collections, Ibn ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him and his father) reported: "The Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) agreed with the people of Khaybar to work and cultivate in return for half of the fruits or crops produced." Therefore, the owner is allowed to lease it in return for a standard percentage of what is cultivated therein, like one-fourth or one-third of its produce.
He also forbade "selling it in advance for years." A version of Muslim reads: "Selling fruits in advance for years," which is selling the fruits of trees and palm trees for two years or more, knowing that such fruits have not been created yet. This is a Gharar sale (uncertain sale) because it involves selling something non-existent, ambiguous, undeliverable, and not owned by the contractor. So, it is a sale that involves a great deal of uncertainty and ambiguity.
The Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) also forbade "selling fruits before ripening," i.e., appearing to be ripe when it becomes colorful and its fruit appears and it becomes red or yellow, which is a sign of its good condition and safety from blight, and it becomes suitable for eating and selling.
The Hadīth shows the prohibition of every sale that involves ambiguity..

1536
Jābir ibn ‘Abdullāh reported: The Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) forbade taking of rent or share of land..

Commentary : In the pre-Islamic era of ignorance, there prevailed types of sales that brimmed with oppression and injustice. When Islam came, it established fair sales and forbade whatever involved oppression. Hence, it forbade whatever involved fraud, uncertainty, and ambiguity to put an end to disputes and conflicts among people, which is one of the Shariah-approved objectives.
During the time of the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him), people used to lease their cultivated lands with contracts that either included an ambiguous rent or entailed injustice to the tenant. Hence, the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) forbade taking rent or share of the land to prevent such contracts. The rent or share here means: The rent agreed upon between the owner, and the lessee is an amount specified from the beginning of the fruits produced by this land, and the land may produce this amount and may not, in which case the one who cultivates it will not be capable of fulfilling his contract. Hence, this was forbidden so they would not deceive the other or wrongfully consume his brother's property.
As for leasing in return for gold, silver, or cash, there is nothing wrong with it, as in the two Sahīh Collections - the wording is that of Muslim - Hanzhalah ibn Qays reported: "That he asked Rāfi‘ ibn Khadīj about leasing land, and he said: The Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) forbade leasing land. He said: I said: Even in return for gold and silver? He said: If it is in return for gold and silver, there is no harm in it." Also in the two Sahīh Collections, Ibn ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him and his father) reported: "The Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) agreed with the people of Khaybar to work and cultivate in return for half of the fruits or crops produced." Therefore, the owner is allowed to lease it in return for a standard percentage of what is cultivated therein, like one-fourth or one-third of its produce..

1536
Jābir reported: The Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) forbade the sale of produce several years in advance. Another version reads: Selling fruits years in advance..

Commentary : Islam cares about protecting people's properties and is keen on not wasting them. It has clarified the manner of dealing with fixed assets and cash and how to manage selling and buying in such a way that guarantees the absence of uncertainty between the transactors and the removal of ambiguity from the sold item.
In this Hadīth, Jābir ibn ‘Abdullah (may Allah be pleased with him and his father) narrates that the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) forbade the sale of selling in advance, or selling fruits years in advance, which is selling the fruits of trees and palm trees for two years or more, knowing that such fruits have not been created yet. This is a Gharar sale (a sale of uncertainty) because it involves selling something non-existent, ambiguous, undeliverable, and not owned by the contractor. So, it is a sale that involves a great deal of uncertainty and ambiguity.
One of the rationales behind this prohibition is the waste of money involved as the sold item might not be achieved, and he would have, thus, spent his money in vain.
The Hadīth shows the Prophet's keenness to establish financial relations among people based on sound grounds to protect the rights of all parties involved..

1536
Jābir reported: The Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) forbade selling the white land (uncultivated land) for two or three years..

Commentary : Islam cares about protecting people's property and is keen on not wasting them. It has clarified the manner of dealing with fixed assets and cash and how to manage selling and buying in such a way that guarantees the absence of uncertainty between the transactors and the removal of ambiguity from the sold item.
In this Hadīth, Jābir ibn ‘Abdullah (may Allah be pleased with him and his father) narrates that the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) forbade selling the white land, which is the land that has no trees or plants. What is meant by selling it here is its "Kirā’" (leasing), which means taking a share of the fruits as a rent for the land. It was called "sale" because it refers to selling a benefit. His saying: "Two or three years" indicates that the land may not yield a product during one of the contract years. Hence, its cultivator will need to fulfill his contract. For this reason, the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) made the original state of the land dominant in the contract so that none of them would deceive the other or consume his brother's property wrongfully.
As for leasing in return for gold, silver, or cash, there is nothing wrong with that, for in the two Sahīh Collections - the wording is that of Muslim - Hanzhalah ibn Qays reported: "That he asked Rāfi‘ ibn Khadīj about leasing land, and he said: The Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) forbade leasing land. He said: I said: Even in return for gold and silver? He said: If it is in return for gold and silver, there is no harm with that."
The Prohibition in this Hadīth is from uncertainty in leasing land in return for something ambiguous or not guaranteed of its fruits and how the transaction should be transparent and known to avoid discord and wasting people's properties..

1541
Abu Hurayrah reported: the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) gave a concession for the sale of ‘Arāyā (unpicked ripe dates for dry dates) by estimation when they are less than - or he said: equal to - five Wasqs (a standard measure)..

Commentary : In the pre-Islamic era of ignorance, there were types of Riba-based sales. When Islam came, it rectified and refined such sale transactions and established the fair sale, which is free from Riba (usury). It forbade all types of sales that involve a possibility of Riba and that involve injustice.
In this Hadīth, Abu Hurayrah (may Allah be pleased with him) reports that the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) "gave a concession," i.e., allowed and permitted, "the sale of ‘Arāyā": A type of sale that takes the following form: Buying fresh dates after becoming ripe on the date palms for dry dates. So, the fruits on the date palm are given to the needy to eat therefrom whenever they like. What is on the date palms is estimated and dry dates are taken in exchange. It was called the ‘Arāya sale because the owner of the date palm gives it to a needy person, i.e., he strips it of its fruits for his sake. However, the Shariah set a condition that this should be done "by estimation," i.e., with a similar number of dried dates for the unpicked fruits. This is because some people would witness the season of ripe dates and wish to feed their children therefrom while having no date palms or money. Hence, the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) wanted to show kindness to them. He also stipulated that this should be of a measure or weight less than "five Wasqs", and the "Wasq" is a standard measure that is equal to sixty Sā‘s, i.e. (130.5kg) one hundred thirty kilograms and a half. Therefore, five Wasqs are equal to almost (653kg) six hundred fifty-three kilograms.
This means: The Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) granted them a concession regarding this kind of sale with this amount only because it could be mistakenly thought to be Riba, as the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) forbade selling fruits for fruits of the same type, which is called a Muzābanah sale (selling something definite for an indefinite amount of its kind). It is as if the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) made for them the exception of the ‘Arāya sale from Muzābanah and restricted it to five Wasqs to avoid the possibility of Riba.
His saying: "Or equal to five Wasqs" refers to the doubt that one of the Hadīth narrators had, and he was Dāwūd ibn al-Husayn, as he did not remember whether it was five Wasqs or less than five Wasqs.
The Hadīth clarifies the concession granted regarding one of the sale transactions out of alleviation and facilitation for the Ummah.
It also points out that the specified amount in the ‘Arāya sale transactions is five Wasqs..

1547
Ibn ‘Umar reported: We did not see anything wrong with Khibr until last year when Rāfi‘ claimed that the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) forbade it. [Another version reads]: So, we abandoned it on account of that. [Another version reads]: Rāfi‘ has forbidden us from benefitting from our land..

Commentary : In the pre-Islamic era of ignorance, there prevailed types of sale that brimmed with oppression and injustice. When Islam came, it established fair sales and forbade whatever involved oppression. Hence, it forbade whatever involved fraud, uncertainty, and ambiguity to put an end to disputes and conflicts among people, which is one of the Shariah-approved objectives.
In this Hadīth, ‘Abdullah ibn ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him and his father) reports that they used to see nothing wrong with Khibr, i.e., they used to practice Mukhābarah (sharecropping), which is leasing the land in return for part of its produce, and the seed or sowing part is from the worker (the lessee). Things continued this way until the year preceding that year when Ibn ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him and his father) was narrating this Hadīth. A version of Muslim reads: "Ibn ‘Umar used to rent his farms during the time of the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him), and during the rule of Abu Bakr, ‘Umar, ‘Uthmān, and the early days of Mu‘āwiyah's caliphate until it was conveyed to him at the end of Mu‘āwiyah's caliphate." As Rāfi‘ ibn Khadīj (may Allah be pleased with him) reported that the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) forbade Mukhābarah. Thereupon, Ibn ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him and his father) refrained from Mukhābarah on account of what was narrated by Rāfi‘ (may Allah be pleased with him) from the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him).
In another version, Ibn ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him and his father) said: "Rāfi‘ has, indeed, forbidden us from benefitting from our land," i.e., Rāfi‘ ibn Khadīj (may Allah be pleased with him) forbade us from benefitting from our land through Mukhābarah.
Ibn ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him and his father) did not ask Rafi‘ for details about what was meant by the prohibition. In the two Sahīh Collections, Hanzhalah ibn Qays reported: "That he asked Rāfi‘ ibn Khadīj about leasing land, and he said: The Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) forbade leasing land. He said: I said: Even in return for gold and silver? He said: If it is in return for gold and silver, there is no harm in it." Also in the two Sahīh Collections, Ibn ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him and his father) reported: "The Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) agreed with the people of Khaybar to work and cultivate in return for half of the fruits or crops produced." Therefore, it is permissible for the owner to rent it in return for a standard percentage of what is cultivated therein, like one-fourth or one-third of its produce. The prohibition refers to whatever involves risk, ambiguity, and uncertainty. The most famous among such transactions was where the landowner used to specify for himself part of the land and what it produces..

1547
Hanzhalah ibn Qays al-Ansāri reported: I asked Rāfi‘ ibn Khadīj about leasing land in return for gold and silver, he replied: "There is no harm in it. At the time of the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) the people used to lease lands in return for the yield of what grows on the banks of large rivers and the beginnings of water streams or the yield of certain parts of the land. Some of the harvest would be destroyed and some would remain safe. This was the only system the people had for renting lands, and thus, he forbade it. If the rent is something known and guaranteed, there is no harm in it.".

Commentary : During the pre-Islamic era of ignorance, there prevailed types of transactions that involved massive oppression and injustice. When Islam came, it established fair sales and forbade whatever involved oppression. Hence, it forbade what entailed fraud, uncertainty, and ambiguity to stop discord and dispute among people, which is one of the Shariah-approved objectives. At the time of the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him), people used to lease lands in return for a share of the yield as rent. The Tābi‘i Hanzhalah ibn Qays al-Ansāri asked the Companion Rāfi‘ ibn Khadīj (may Allah be pleased with him) about leasing it, i.e., renting it in return for gold and silver, which are meant here to refer to the dinar and dirham. This is a question about leasing land in return for gold and silver instead of leasing it in return for part of the yield. Rāfi‘ (may Allah be pleased with him) replied that there is no objection to leasing land in return for gold and silver, and he said: "At the time of the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) the people used to lease lands in return for the yield of what grows on the banks of large rivers," which are the watercourses coming from the wide river. It was said: What grows on the banks of the watercourse, and it was said: What grows around the brooklets. "And the beginnings of water streams," which are the beginnings of small rivers, "or the yield of certain parts of the land," i.e., types of the cultivated crops. This means: the owner allocates to himself the parts that would yield the best fruits or the finest crops, and the rest is for the tenant.
Rāfi‘ said: "Some of the harvest would be destroyed and some would remain safe," i.e., either the harvest of the owner or that of the tenant is destroyed, so one of them is wronged. "This was the only system the people had for renting lands, and thus, he forbade it," i.e., the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) prohibited this kind of rent given the Jahālah (ambiguity) that it involved, and Jahālah is Gharar (uncertainty). If the rent, however, is something known and guaranteed, i.e., a known rent in cash, then there is no objection to leasing the land in return for such rent.
The Hadīth points out the permissibility of leasing land in return for a known amount of cash money..

1548
Rāfi‘ ibn Khadīj reported: At the time of the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him), we used to lease land based on Muhāqalah so that we would lease it in return for one-third or one-quarter of the yield or a specified amount of food. One day, a man from among my paternal uncles came and said: The Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) has forbidden us from something beneficial for us, but obedience to Allah and His Messenger is more beneficial for us. He has forbidden us to lease land based on Muhāqalah and to lease it in return for one-third or one-quarter of the yield and for a specified amount of food. He commanded the landowner to cultivate it or to give it to someone else to cultivate. He disliked leasing it or anything else. [Another version reads]: We used to lease land based on Muhāqalah, leasing it in return for one-third or one-quarter of the yield..

Commentary : In the pre-Islamic era of ignorance, there prevailed types of sale that brimmed with oppression and injustice. When Islam came, it established fair sales and forbade whatever involved oppression. Hence, it forbade whatever involved fraud, uncertainty, and ambiguity to end disputes and conflicts among people, which is one of the Shariah-approved objectives.
In this Hadīth, Rāfi‘ ibn Khadīj (may Allah be pleased with him) reports that they used to lease land based on Muhāqalah during the time of the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him). There are different opinions regarding the meaning of Muhāqalah. It is said: It means leasing the land in return for wheat, as interpreted in some versions, which is called Muhārathah by the cultivators. It is said: It means the cultivation of land in return for a known share of its produce, like one-third, one-fourth, or the like as mentioned in this Hadīth. It is said: It means selling food in its ears in return for wheat grains. It is said: It means selling crops before fully growing. His saying: "And for a specified amount of food," i.e., by taking a specified share of the fruits as a rent for the land, and all this entails ambiguity in the contract between the owner and the lessee. Then, Rāfi '(may Allah be pleased with him) reported that things continued in this way until one day, one of his paternal uncles - it is said: His uncle Zhahīr ibn Rāfi '- came and informed them that the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) forbade them from something beneficial for them, referring to Muhāqalah, which was what they obtained in return for using the land so that they would benefit and the worker would benefit as well. However, this benefit, in fact, is a partial benefit, and perhaps it will not be safe from harm, as its fruits might be ruined, which would lead to the loss of the right of one of them. "But obedience to Allah and His Messenger is more beneficial for us," i.e., obeying Allah and His Messenger (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) to what he guides us is more beneficial for us than this assumed benefit of Kirā’ and Muzāra‘ah that we used to practice. In fact, responding to the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) is better and more beneficial for their religion and worldly life. One of their ways of practicing Muhāqalah was leasing land in return for one-third or one-fourth of its yield or a specified amount of food, i.e., by taking a share of the fruits as a rent for the land. So, the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) commanded the landowner to cultivate it himself or give it to someone to cultivate. The Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) disliked "leasing it or anything else," i.e., anything related to leasing. It is said: This was during the early days of emigration out of compassion for them; they had either to cultivate it or to let it be cultivated by others from their emigrant brothers. Then, he (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) granted a concession for leasing. It was reported that there is no harm in leasing in return for gold, silver, or cash, as in the two Sahīh Collections, Hanzhalah ibn Qays reported: "That he asked Rāfi‘ ibn Khadīj about leasing land, and he said: The Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) forbade leasing land. He said: I said: Even in return for gold and silver? He said: If it is in return for gold and silver, there is no harm in it." Also in the two Sahīh Collections, Ibn ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him and his father) reported: "The Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) agreed with the people of Khaybar to work and cultivate in return for half of the fruits or crops produced." Therefore, it is permissible for the owner to rent it in return for a standard percentage of what is cultivated therein, like one-fourth or one-third of its produce. The prohibition refers to whatever involves risk, ambiguity, and uncertainty. The most famous among such transactions was where the landowner used to specify for himself part of the land and what it produced.
The Hadīth highlights the fact that Allah Almighty and His Messenger (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) never forbid benefits and interests; rather, they forbid evil consequences and whatever leads to them..

1549
‘Abdullah ibn as-Sā’ib reported: We entered upon ‘Abdullah ibn Ma‘qil and asked him about Muzāra‘ah (sharecropping). He said: Thābit claimed that the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) forbade Muzāra‘ah and commanded Mu’ājarah (leasing land for rent), and he said: There is no harm in it..

Commentary : In the pre-Islamic era of ignorance, there prevailed types of sales that brimmed with oppression and injustice. When Islam came, it established fair sales and forbade whatever involved oppression. Hence, it forbade whatever involved fraud, uncertainty, and ambiguity to end disputes and conflicts among people, which is one of the Shariah-approved objectives.
In this Hadīth, Thābit ibn ad-Dahhāk (may Allah be pleased with him) reports that the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) forbade Muzāra‘ah, which is leasing the land in return for part of it and working on the land for part of its fruit production. The prohibition here refers to whatever involves risk, ambiguity, and uncertainty, and the most famous among such transactions was the one where the landowner used to specify for himself part of the land and what it produced. However, apart from this, it is permissible for the owner to lease it for a standard percentage of what is cultivated therein, like one-fourth or one-third of its produce, as it is mentioned in the two Sahīh Collections that Ibn ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him and his father) reported: "The Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) agreed with the people of Khaybar to work and cultivate in return for half of the fruits or crops produced."
The Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) commanded and made it permissible for them to practice Mu’ājarah instead of Muzāra‘ah and it means taking a known rent in gold, silver, or cash because this kind of lease is the farthest from uncertainty and ambiguity. In the two Sahīh Collections, Hanzhalah ibn Qays reported: "That he asked Rāfi‘ ibn Khadīj about leasing land, and he said: The Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) forbade leasing land. He said: I said: Even in return for gold and silver? He said: If it is in return for gold and silver, there is no harm in it.".

1551
Ibn ‘Umar reported: 'Umar ibn al-Khattāb expelled the Jews and the Christians from the land of Hijāz, and when the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) conquered Khaybar, he wanted to expel the Jews from that place, for when the land was conquered, it came to belong to Allah, His Messenger, and the Muslims. Hence, he wanted to expel the Jews from it. However, the Jews asked the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) to leave them there on condition that they should do all its work and have half the produce. The Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) said to them: We shall leave you there on that condition for as long as we wish. So, they stayed there until ‘Umar expelled them to Taymā’ and Arīhā’..

Commentary : Some of the Jewish tribes were living in Madīnah, and they kept betraying Muslims and breaching their covenants with the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) during his lifetime and with his Companions after his death. So, some of them made covenants with them, whereas others declared war against them.
In this Hadīth, ‘Abdullah ibn ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him and his father) reports that the Caliph ‘Umar ibn al-Khattāb (may Allah be pleased with him) expelled the Jews and the Christians, i.e., he deported them from the land of Hijāz, namely Makkah and Madīnah and their surroundings.
Ibn ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him and his father) reports that when the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) gained victory over the people of Khaybar and overcame them in the seventh year of Hijrah, and it was a village inhabited by the Jews almost 168 kilometers away from Madīnah from the direction of the Levant, he (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) wanted to expel the Jews from it, for when the land of Khaybar was conquered by Muslims, it became a possession of Allah, His Messenger, and Muslims. This clearly shows that the land was no longer owned by the Jews after being conquered by Muslims; rather, the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) distributed it among the victorious Muslims and it became among their possessions. What is meant by it being a possession of Allah and His Messenger is that some of its shares were given to the Muslims' public treasury.
On knowing that the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) wanted to deport them from Khaybar, the Jews asked him to allow them to stay in it and leave them on condition that they would work therein in the trees and the land in return for half of its fruits, whereas the other half would be for him, and he (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) agreed to the condition they stipulated for themselves. His saying: "For as long as we wish", was an exception made by the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) to the condition of their stay. It means that if Muslims wanted to expel you from that place, you would have to leave, as the Jews were not entitled to anything if Muslims had a different opinion. The agreement was concluded on such terms, and the Jews remained in Khaybar and stayed therein during the time of the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) and during the caliphate of Abu Bakr as-Siddīq (may Allah be pleased with him) until 'Umar ibn al-Khattāb (may Allah be pleased with him) became the caliph. During his time, Muslims were of the opinion of expelling the Jews from the Peninsula, and this acted as an invalidation of the contract between the Muslims and the Jews, and 'Umar (may Allah be pleased with him) expelled them from that place to Taymā' and Arīhā'.
Taymā’ is a place on the way of Madīnah and Tabūk city toward the Levant. Historically and geographically, it is located northwest of the Arabian Peninsula. It is almost 264 kilometres away to the east of Tabūk city and nearly 420 kilometres away to the north of Madīnah, whereas Arīhā’ was a village in the Levant.
The reason why ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him) expelled the Jews was narrated in Al-Bukhāri Collection where ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him) said: ‘Abdullah ibn ‘Umar went to his property there and was attacked at night, and his hands and feet were injured, and as we have no enemies there except them, they are our enemies and the ones whom we suspect, and I have made up my mind to exile them. So, he exiled them and gave them the price of the fruits they were entitled to in the form of money, camels, and goods, including saddles, ropes, etc. In the two Sahīh Collections, the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) said: "Expel the polytheists from Arabia."
The Hadīth shows that agricultural land is leased to the landowner for a known portion of its fruits, whereas the rest goes to its cultivator.
It points out that a Muslim ruler has the right to conclude treaties, make whatever exceptions he wants, and revoke such treaties based on the agreed-upon conditions, provided that all this is for the benefit of Muslims.
It highlights the fact that dealing with the People of the Book should be for what brings benefit, not harm, to the Muslim Ummah, along with being careful and taking precautions against them..