logo

| 2 Hadiths

Hadith
89
It was narrated that ‘Umar said: I and an Ansari neighbour of mine in [the neighbourhood of] Banu Umayyah ibn Zayd in ‘Awali al-Madinah used to take turns to go down to the Messenger of Allah (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him). He would go down one day, and I would go down one day; if I went down, I would bring the news of the day, revelation and other events, and if he went down he would do the same. My Ansari friend went down one day when it was his turn, then he knocked loudly at my door and said: Is he there? I was startled and came out to him, and he said: Something serious has happened! I went to Hafsah and found her weeping. I said: Has the Messenger of Allah (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) divorced you? She said: I do not know. Then I went to the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) and said, whilst standing there: Have you divorced your wives? He said: “No.” So I said: Allahu akbar..

Commentary : The Sahabah were keenly interested in hearing what the Messenger of Allah (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) said, and were very eager to listen to him at all times. But sometimes they had to go and attend to their affairs and their livelihood. So they would take turns to go to the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him), but there were others who stayed close to the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) for several years.
In this hadith, ‘Umar ibn al-Khattab (may Allah be pleased with him) narrates that he and an Ansari neighbour of his – whose name was  ‘Itban ibn Malik (may Allah be pleased with him) – lived in the neighbourhood of the tribe of Banu Umayyah ibn Zayd, whose houses were located in ‘Awali al-Madinah (the heights of Madinah); this refers to villages near the city of the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him), on higher ground to the east of Madinah. The closest part of al-‘Awali to Madinah was two or three miles away from the city, and the furthest part was eight miles away. They used to take turns to go down to the Messenger of Allah (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him); ‘Umar would go down one day, and ‘Itban would go down another day. That was due to their work circumstances, as it was not possible for each of them to go down to the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) and learn from him on a daily basis.
Then ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him) narrated that his friend went down to the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) one day, and when he came back from Madinah, he knocked loudly on ‘Umar’s door, which was not something that he usually did, and he asked whether ‘Umar was in the house or not. When ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him) heard that, he was startled and was afraid that something bad had happened. So he came out, and his friend said to him: Something serious has happened; the Messenger of Allah (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) has divorced his wives. So ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him) went down to Madinah, to his daughter Hafsah (may Allah be pleased with her), the wife of the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him). He found her weeping, so he asked her: Has the Messenger of Allah (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) divorced you? She said: I do not know. Then he went to the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) and asked him, as he was standing and had not sat down: Have you divorced your wives? He said: No, so ‘Umar said takbir – “Allahu akbar.” Thus his mind was put at rest; he was overwhelmed with joy and happiness, so he said takbir out of great joy.
This hadith highlights the interest of the Sahabah (may Allah be pleased with them) in hearing news of the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) in particular, and of the Muslims in general, especially news of divine revelation and what it brought of teachings and rulings.
It indicates that it is encouraged to seek knowledge and be keen to attend gatherings of knowledge, no matter what the circumstances.
It indicates that the wise person does not hasten to ask about an issue until he understands what the issue is.
It also indicates that the seeker of knowledge may pay attention to his livelihood and that which will enable him to continue seeking knowledge..

90
It was narrated that Abu Mas‘ud al-Ansari said: A man said: O Messenger of Allah, I can hardly keep up with the prayers, because So-and-so makes them too lengthy for us.
I had never seen the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) more angry in giving exhortation that he was on that day. He said: “O people, you are putting others off. Whoever leads the people in prayer, let him make it brief, for among them are the sick, the physically weak, and those with needs.”.

Commentary : Prayer is an act of worship which requires presence of mind and ease of movement. Hence the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) explained the rulings on prayer and the related rulings on leading prayer and making it brief and easy for the people.
In this hadith, Abu Mas‘ud al-Ansari (may Allah be pleased with him) narrates that a man complained to the Messenger of Allah (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) that he was not able to keep up with the prayer, because the imam made it so lengthy. There is a difference of scholarly opinion concerning what was meant by the man’s words, “I can hardly keep up with the prayers, because So-and-so makes them too lengthy for us.” It was said that the wording may indicate that he was a man who was sick or physically weak, so if the imam made the standing too long, then as soon as he reached the positions of bowing or prostrating, he would feel too weak to keep up with him, so he would hardly be able to bow or prostrate with him. Or it was said: rather it is explained by what al-Bukhari narrated, [that the man said]: I join the prayer late. In that case the meaning would be: I can hardly catch up with the prayer in congregation, and sometimes I come late, because he makes it so lengthy, so I do not catch up with the congregation, even though he makes it too long.
The Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) got very angry, and the reason why he showed such anger was that he wanted his Companions to pay attention to what he was going to tell them, so that the one who did that would not repeat it. Therefore he exhorted them when he was very angry, telling them that those who made the prayer too long were putting people off, and making people dislike praying. The reason why he addressed everyone, and did not mention by name the one who was making the prayer lengthy, was out of kindness and gentleness, as was his usual approach. He did not address any rebuke or discipline specifically to the one who deserved it, so that that one would not be embarrassed and feel ashamed in front of people.
Then he instructed the one who led people in prayer to make the prayer shorter, because among the congregation were those who were sick, physically weak and had needs. He mentioned these three types, because they include all types of reasons why the prayer should be made brief, for the reasons which dictate making the prayer brief include either physical well-being or other matters. So in the first case, it is either because of something inherent, namely physical weakness, or something temporary, namely sickness.
The Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) wanted to show kindness and make things easy for his ummah. He did not prohibit making prayers lengthy because doing so is not permissible; rather the one who wants to offer supererogatory prayers by himself may make the prayer lengthy.
This hadith is a rebuke to those who make the prayers lengthy if those praying behind him are not happy with that.
It highlights the kindness of the Lawgiver and how he made things easy for his ummah.
It also indicates that one may show anger when seeing something that is not appropriate with regard to matters of religion..

91
It was narrated from Zayd ibn Khalid al-Juhani that a man asked the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) about lost property, and he said: “Learn what kind of string it is tied with, or what kind of vessel it is in, or what kind of leather bag it is in. Then announce that to the people for a year, and after that make use of it. Then if its owner comes, give it to him.” He asked: What about a stray camel? He got so angry that his cheeks turned red, or his face turned red, and said: “What has it to do with you? It has its water and its feet, and it is able to find water and graze from the trees. Let it be until its owner finds it.” He said: What about a lost sheep? He said: “It is for you, or for your brother, or for the wolf.”.

Commentary : One of the greatest objectives of sharia is preservation of people’s wealth and protecting it from plunder, theft and loss, or anyone hoping to keep it when it is lost.
In this hadith, Zayd ibn Khalid al-Juhani narrates that a man asked the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) about lost property, which is property that has been lost in the street and its owner is not known. The Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) advised the one who finds a lost item to learn all its distinguishing characteristics, such as the shape and colour of the vessel and string. The “leather bag” referred to here is something that was used to keep money in; it may be made of leather, cloth or other material. The string is something that was used to tie vessels with. All of this is by way of learning its characteristics. Then he should announce to the people that he has this lost item, and continue to announce it for a whole year, in an attempt to return it to its owner, then after one year he may make use of it. If he does find its owner during that year, then he should give it to him. If the owner comes after a year has passed, and describes its distinguishing characteristics, such as its shape, colour, type of vessel, and so on, and he still has it, then he should give it to him; if he has disposed of it, he is liable for it, and he should give its owner its value and price.
Then the man asked the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) about the ruling on a stray camel, and he responded by saying that it is not to be taken, because it has all that it needs to survive, namely strong and solid feet to walk on, and the ability to store and keep water, in its belly and hump. Moreover, it can find vegetation and water around it, even after a number of days, and it can store the water in its belly and remain hydrated.
It was said that the only reason the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) got angry when he was asked about a stray camel is the lack of knowledge and poor understanding on the part of the questioner, as he failed to understand the matter being discussed, and he did not pay attention to it. Thus he made an incorrect analogy, because lost property refers to items that may be dropped by the owner, so he does not know where they went, whereas a stray camel is not like that, because it may graze for several days, then go back to the place that it knows, or its owner may come and take it.
Then the man asked the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) about the ruling on lost sheep, and he answered by saying that the one who finds it may take it. The words “It is for you or your brother” mean: either you will take it, or someone else will do so, otherwise it will be food for the wolf, if it is left.
In this hadith, the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) enjoined the announcing of lost property for one year, whereas in the hadith of Ubayy that was narrated by al-Bukhari, it says: The Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) enjoined announcing it for three years. We may reconcile these two reports by interpreting the hadith of Ubayy ibn Ka‘b as referring to being more careful and prudent, not disposing of lost property, and exercising a high level of restraint in not making use of it, whilst this hadith and similar reports may be interpreted as referring to the minimum that is required, or cases where the one who finds something needs it, whereas Ubayy had no need of the lost property that he found.
This hadith also highlights how Islam pays attention to all aspects of life that may concern a person and be part of his life, whether by his choice or otherwise..

92
It was narrated that Abu Musa said: The Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) was asked about things he disliked, and when he was asked too many such questions, he got angry, then he said to the people: “Ask me whatever you want.” A man said: Who is my father? He said: “Your father is Hudhafah.” Another man stood up and said: Who is my father, O Messenger of Allah? He said: “Your father is Salim, the freed slave of Shaybah.”  When ‘Umar saw the expression on his face, he said: O Messenger of Allah, we repent to Allah (may He be glorified and exalted)..

Commentary : Islam enjoins doing whatever one is able to do, and completely avoiding that which is forbidden according to Islamic teachings. It enjoins us to stop at what Allah and His Messenger have enjoined upon us, and not to go beyond that or ask too many questions about matters the knowledge of which is of no benefit.
In this hadith, Abu Musa al-Ash‘ari (may Allah be pleased with him) tells us that the Messenger of Allah (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) was asked about things that he did not like to be asked about, because they were of no benefit in either religious or worldly terms, or because the answer could be harmful to the questioner or to someone else. When the people asked too many such questions, he said to them: “Ask me whatever you want.” Then he was asked by two men who wanted to confirm whether their attribution to their fathers was correct, and he replied that that was indeed the case. When ‘Umar saw anger on the Prophet’s face, he realized that these questions should not be asked, so he turned to the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him), seeking to assuage his anger, and said: O Messenger of Allah, we repent to Allah from asking these questions which have upset you. That was because these questions were something that the Messenger of Allah (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) did not like, and because too many of these questions could be a cause of something being made haram or obligatory, or something being made too strict. And that is proven in the revelation, as Allah (may He be exalted) says: {O you who have believed, do not ask about things which, if they are shown to you, will distress you} [al-Ma’idah 5:101]. This does not mean that one should not ask about things that one needs to know of religious matters; rather it is advice to be content with the commands and prohibitions of Allah, and not to concern oneself with questions for which there is no need.
This hadith indicates that it is the right of the knowledgeable person to express anger with the questioner if he asks a question that could lead to negative consequences, or that is not appropriate to the topic under discussion.
It also indicates that it is not allowed to ask too many questions or to persist in asking questions, and that nothing should be asked except what is needed.
And it highlights the virtue of ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him) and how alert he was..

94
It was narrated from Anas, from the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) that when he gave the greeting of salaam, he gave it three times, and when he said something he would repeat it three times..

Commentary : The Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) was very keen to teach and educate his ummah, and he used various educational methods to communicate information soundly. In this hadith, he teaches us the etiquette of speaking and greeting. ‘Abdullah ibn ‘Umar ibn al-Khattab (may Allah be pleased with him) narrated that when the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) greeted someone with salaam, he would greet him three times, and perhaps this refers to his practice when greeting a large number of people who would not all hear a greeting given once, or it was his practice to make sure that they heard the second and third greetings if he thought that the first one had not been heard, or he would repeat the salaam because he wanted to seek permission to enter, if the first salaam was not heard or responded to. But if he passed by a gathering and greeted everyone present, or he came to a house and gave the greeting of salaam and they responded, then there was no point in repeating it. It may be that when he came to some people, he would give the greeting of salaam by way of seeking permission to enter, then when he entered the house, he would greet them with salaam, then when he got up to leave the gathering he would say salaam to bid farewell, which is like a supplication (dua).
If he uttered a sentence, he would repeat it three times, so that those who were present would understand it and comprehend its meaning, because repetition was most effective in helping people to remember and making the pronunciation clear, so that there would be no room for misinterpretation, especially if there was the fear that his words might not be understood or heard, or if he wanted to convey the message when he was teaching, rebuking or exhorting. This is one of the basic principles of teaching in Islam, because repeating something three times is sufficient to make the meaning clear and leave no excuse for anybody. The Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) used to always do that in his actions too, so that his ummah could emulate him and so as to be an example for others..

95
It was narrated from Anas from the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) that when he said something, he would repeat it three times so that it could be understood, and when he came to some people, he would greet them with salaam three times..

Commentary : The Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) was as Allah described him: {There has certainly come to you a Messenger from among yourselves. Grievous to him is what you suffer; [he is] concerned over you and to the believers is kind and merciful} [at-Tawbah 9:128]. One example of that is his keenness to teach them and make sure they understood the matters of their religion. In this hadith, Anas (may Allah be pleased with him) narrates that the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) used to repeat his words three times when he wanted to exhort them, so that those who were present would understand it and comprehend its meaning, because repetition was most effective in helping people to remember and making the pronunciation clear, so that there would be no room for misinterpretation, especially if there was the fear that his words might not be understood or heard, or if he wanted to convey the message when he was teaching, rebuking or exhorting. This is one of the basic principles of teaching in Islam, because repeating something three times is sufficient to make the meaning clear and leave no excuse for anybody.
When the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) came to people, he would greet them with salaam three times, and perhaps this refers to his practice when greeting a large number of people who would not all hear a greeting given once, or it was his practice to make sure that they heard the second and third greeting if he thought that the first one had not been heard, or he would repeat the salaam because he wanted to seek permission to enter, if the first salaam was not heard or responded to. But if he passed by a gathering and greeted everyone present, or he came to a house and gave the greeting of salaam and they responded, then there was no point in repeating it. It may be that when he came to some people, he would give the greeting of salaam by way of seeking permission to enter, then when he entered the house, he would greet them with salaam, then when he got up to leave the gathering he would say salaam to bid farewell, which is like a supplication (dua).  .

97
It was narrated that Abu Musa said: The Messenger of Allah (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) said: “There are three who will have a double reward: a man from among the People of the Book who believed in his Prophet and believed in Muhammad (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him); a slave who does his duty to Allah and to his master; and a man who has a slave woman whom he disciplines and disciplines well, and he teaches her and teaches her well, then he manumits her and marries her. He will have a double reward.” Then ‘Amir said: We are giving this report to you without you making any great effort. People used to travel to Madinah to seek a report less important than this..

Commentary : Allah’s bounty to His slaves is immense, which includes His generosity in multiplying the rewards for deeds. The Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) used to urge the people to do acts of worship and all kinds of righteous deeds by highlighting the rewards for righteous deeds and mentioning different types thereof.
In this hadith, the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) states that three types of people will have a double reward. The first is a man of the People of the Book, a Jew or Christian, who believed in his Prophet who was sent to him previously, namely Musa or ‘Isa (peace be upon them), and he believed in Muhammad when his call reached him. He will have two rewards: a reward for believing in Musa or ‘Isa, and a reward for believing in Muhammad (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him). If he enters Islam and becomes a good Muslim, then every good deed that he did before that will be recorded for him. This is proven in the verses in which Allah (may He be exalted) says: {Those to whom We gave the Scripture before it - they are believers in it, And when it is recited to them, they say, “We have believed in it; indeed, it is the truth from our Lord. Indeed we were, [even] before it, Muslims [submitting to Allah].” Those will be given their reward twice} [al-Qasas 28:52-54].
The second is a slave who does his duty to Allah, so he worships Allah (may He be exalted), and he does what is obligatory upon him of prayer, fasting and so on. And he also does what his master requires him to do, in the best manner. He will also have two rewards: a reward for worshipping Allah (may He be exalted) and a reward for obeying his master, showing forbearance for the pain of enslavement, and submitting and accepting his duties as a slave.
The third is a man who has a slave woman with whom he has intercourse because he owns her, and he disciplines her without violence or beating; rather he does so with kindness and gentleness, and he educates her and takes good care of her, teaching her the pillars and rulings of Islam, then he manumits her and marries her, giving her the rights of a free woman. He will have two rewards: a reward for teaching her and manumitting her, and a reward for marrying her. Whoever does that is far removed from arrogance, and is very humble, keeping away from showing off by marrying a woman of noble lineage and high status.
The words “We are giving this report to you without you making any great effort. People used to travel to Madinah to seek a report less important than this” are addressed to a man from Khorasan who asked ‘Amir al-Sha‘bi about a man who manumits his slave woman then marries her, and he responded by narrating this hadith.
This hadith highlights the great bounty and generosity of Allah to those who obey Him.
It indicates that whoever does well in two aspects of any act of righteousness will have a double reward, for Allah multiplies the reward for whomever He wills.
It highlights the virtue of teaching a slave woman and treating her kindly.
It highlights the fact that the early generations used to travel to distant lands to seek a single hadith or to learn about a single issue of knowledge..

98
It was narrated that Ibn ‘Abbas said: I bear witness that the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him – or ‘Ata’ said: I bear witness that Ibn ‘Abbas said: The Messenger of Allah (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) – went out, accompanied by Bilal, because he thought that he had not been heard [by the women], and he exhorted them and instructed them to give charity. So the women began to give their earrings and rings, and Bilal collected them in the edge of his garment..

Commentary : The Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) used to seek appropriate occasions to exhort his companions from time to time, at times when they had energy and it was thought that they would listen and understand, and on Islamic occasions and Eids. He would address the women in particular, as in this hadith, in which ‘Abdullah ibn ‘Abbas (may Allah be pleased with him) narrates that the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) went out, accompanied by Bilal, and exhorted his companions. Then it occurred to him that his voice might not have reached the women, because they were sitting behind the men in the prayer-place on Eid al-Fitr. So he went through the rows of men until he came to the women, then he exhorted them, reminded them about Paradise and Hell, and instructed them to give charity. The women responded to the Messenger of Allah (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) and gave their earrings and rings in charity, and Bilal collected them in the edge of his garment. He collected this jewellery and charitable gifts so that they could be given and distributed among the poor and needy who were entitled to them, and be spent on other causes as prescribed in Islamic teachings.
What is meant by the words “or ‘Ata’ said: I bear witness that Ibn ‘Abbas said” is that the narrator was not sure whether the phrase “I bear witness” reflected the words of Ibn ‘Abbaas testifying about the action of the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him), or the words of ‘Ata’ testifying about the words of Ibn ‘Abbas. Rather he said “I bear witness” to emphasize and confirm that the incident definitely took place.
This hadith indicates that one should be keen to teach all people, men and women.
It highlights the virtue of the women among the Sahabah (may Allah be pleased with them) and how quickly they responded to the exhortation and command of the Messenger of Allah (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him). .

99
It was narrated from Abu Hurayrah that he said: It was said: O Messenger of Allah, who will be most blessed with your intercession on the Day of Resurrection? The Messenger of Allah (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) said: “I thought, O Abu Hurayrah, that no one would ask me about this hadith before you, because of what I have seen of your keenness to learn hadith. Those who will be most blessed with my intercession on the Day of Resurrection will be those who say La ilaha illa Allah with sincerity, from the heart.”.

Commentary : The Sahabah (may Allah be pleased with them) were always keen to ask the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) about the most important actions that would benefit them the most and save them in the hereafter. One aspect of that was their keenness to attain his intercession, as we see in this hadith, in which Abu Hurayrah (may Allah be pleased with him) narrates that the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) was asked who would be most blessed with his intercession on the Day of Resurrection. The one who asked this question was Abu Hurayrah (may Allah be pleased with him). The Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) responded that those who would be most blessed with his intercession on the Day of Resurrection would be those who said La ilaha illa Allah, believing in the meaning of this phrase, acting in accordance with it, showing sincerity in faith by keeping away from shirk and showing sincerity in obedience by not showing off. The fact that the sincere believer will be more blessed with the Prophet’s intercession than others is due to the fact that superiority in this regard depends on the level of sincerity that one attains. So he [the one who attains a higher level of sincerity] will be more blessed than the one who does not attain this high and perfect level of sincerity. Many people will attain the blessing of the Prophet’s intercession, but the sincere believer will attain a greater blessing in that regard. The Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) will intercede for people to be given relief from the terror of standing [on the Day of Resurrection], and he will intercede for some of the disbelievers to have their punishment reduced, as is soundly narrated concerning Abu Talib, the maternal uncle of the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him). He will also intercede for some of the believers to be brought forth from the Fire after having entered it; for some of them not to enter it even though they deserve to do so; for some of them to enter Paradise without being brought to account; and for some of them to be raised in status therein. So they will have in common the fact that they are all blessed with his intercession, but the one who will be most blessed with it is the sincere believer.
The Prophet’s words to Abu Hurayrah (may Allah be pleased with him), “I thought, O Abu Hurayrah, that no one would ask me about this hadith before you, because of what I have seen of your keenness to learn hadith”, affirms the status and mature thinking of Abu Hurayrah (may Allah be pleased with him), and that his questions were the type of question that is desirable and will benefit the questioner and others with regard to both religious and worldly matters; they were not the type of question that is forbidden.
This hadith indicates that it is encouraged to be keen to acquire knowledge and goodness, for such keenness will prompt a person to research issues that are not clear and to learn about subtle matters, and that will bring benefit and reward, and a reward like those who act upon such knowledge, until the Day of Resurrection.
It also shows that a scholar should be able to analyze and understand the character of the one who is learning from him, and he should point out his good qualities to him, so that it will motivate him to strive harder.
It indicates that it is appropriate for a scholar to keep quiet about some issues of knowledge if he is not asked about them, until he is asked, and that is not to be regarded as concealing or withholding knowledge, because the seeker of knowledge should initiate questions, unless it becomes essential for the scholar to explain some issues, in which case he should not keep quiet.
This hadith affirms that our Prophet Muhammad (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) will intercede for people.
It also highlights the virtue of Abu Hurayrah (may Allah be pleased with him) and his keenness to seek knowledge. .

100
It was narrated that ‘Abdullah ibn ‘Amr ibn  al-‘As said: I heard the Messenger of Allah (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) saying: “Allah will not take knowledge away by snatching it from people; rather He will take knowledge away through the death of the scholars until, when no knowledgeable people are left, the people will follow ignorant leaders who will be asked questions and will issue fatwas without knowledge; thus they will go astray and lead others astray.”.

Commentary : Allah has made knowledge a beacon that guides to His path, and without knowledge the people will lose their way. True knowledge prevents one from falling into error.
In this hadith, the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) tells us that Allah will not take knowledge away from people by removing it from the hearts of the scholars and erasing it; rather He will take knowledge away through the death of the scholars. Thus knowledge will be lost, and there will be no one among those who are left to take the place of the scholars who have passed away. Every time a scholar passes away, the knowledge that he had will be lost, until Allah will have left no knowledgeable person, as all the people of true knowledge will have died, then ignorant people will reach academic positions for which they are not qualified, such as teaching, issuing fatwas, and so on. But the people will regard them as scholars and ask them questions, so they will issue fatwas without knowledge, because of their ignorance. They will regard as permissible that which is forbidden, and regard as forbidden that which is permissible. They themselves will go astray from the truth, and they will lead astray those of the common folk who follow them and accept their fatwas. Books and essays are not sufficient without scholars, because they cannot be understood in a proper manner without them.
In this hadith, we are urged to seek knowledge and memorize it, for it will not be taken away except when the scholars die.
It is also a warning against appointing ignorant people to positions of leadership, and it warns those in authority not to appoint ignorant people to positions of religious authority.
It also highlights the fact that the position of issuing fatwas is a true position of leadership, and criticizes those who issue fatwas without knowledge. .

101
It was narrated that Abu Sa‘id al-Khudri said: The women said to the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him): The men are taking all your time, so allocate a day for us. So he allocated a day for them, when he met with them, exhorted them and instructed them. Among the things that he said to them was: “There is no woman among you who sends ahead three of her children, but they will be a shield for her against the Fire.” A woman said: Or two [of her children]? He said: “Or two.”.

Commentary : Allah (may He be glorified and exalted) has promised an immense reward to those who bear with patience the calamities that befall them.
In this hadith, the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) gives glad tidings to women who are faced with the loss of a child of the immense reward that results from this calamity. They had asked him to set aside a day for them on which he could exhort them and speak to them, and they said to him: The men are taking all your time, meaning: they prevent us from being able to sit with you and listen to you. So the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) set aside a day for them, when he exhorted them and reminded them of the reward for bearing calamity with patience. He told them that there is no woman, three of whose children die during her lifetime, but this calamity will be a shield for her, a barrier that will protect her from the Fire. A woman said: What about one who loses two of her children; will she have the same reward as one who loses three? And the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) said, “Or two.” So if two of a woman’s children die during her lifetime, that calamity will be a shield for her that will protect her from entering the Fire.
The report of Abu Hurayrah that was narrated by al-Bukhaari explains that what is meant here is three children who do not reach puberty; that reward is on condition that they did not reach the age of accountability at which sins begin to be recorded. The ruling here stipulates that the reward comes only in the case where the children did not reach puberty, because parents’ hearts are more compassionate and more attached to a small child, in a way that is not applicable in the case of a child who has reached adulthood, because in the case of a child who has reached adulthood, in most cases he has invariably gone against his parents.
And it was said that the ruling stipulated the condition of three children at first, because three comes under the heading of many. A believer may be afflicted with the loss of one child, but his faith is strong enough to enable him to bear the calamity with patience, but he may not be able to bear it if it happens again. Hence the one who goes through repeated calamities and bears them with patience is more deserving of great reward. A child is one of the greatest joys that a person may have in life, to the extent that he would willingly sacrifice himself for his child. This is what is usually the case with people, and even with animals, hence the Messenger of Allah (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) referred to the worst type of calamity, and urged people to bear it with patience and perseverance.
This hadith was addressed to the women, but it is applicable to all Muslims, as al-Bukhaari narrated from Abu Hurayrah (may Allah be pleased with him) that the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) said: “No Muslim who loses three of his children in death will ever enter the Fire, except in fulfilment of the oath.” This includes both men and women.
This hadith is indicative of a great reward for the one who loses his children, if he bears it with patience and does not say anything reprehensible.
It indicates that women may ask about religious matters.
It also indicates that the children of the Muslims [who died before reaching puberty] are in Paradise, because if Allah (may He be glorified) has mercy on their parents and admits them to Paradise because of their mercy and compassion towards their children, then it is more appropriate that the children will also receive His mercy..

102
It was narrated that Abu Hurayrah said: Three who have not reached puberty..

Commentary : Children are a blessing from Allah (may He be glorified), and parents feel great love for them, to the extent that they may be a trial for their parents. But death is something that is decreed for all people, and Allah has ordained an immense reward for parents who bear with patience the loss of their children.
This hadith, which was narrated by Abu Hurayrah (may Allah be pleased with him), is part of – and completes – the report of Abu Sa‘id al-Khudri (may Allah be pleased with him) which was narrated in Sahih al-Bukhari. In it, it says that the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) exhorted the women and said to them: “There is no woman among you who sends ahead three of her children, but they will be a shield for her against the Fire.” A woman said: Or two [of her children]? He said: “Or two.” Abu Hurayrah (may Allah be pleased with her) added: “Three who have not reached the age of puberty.” Thus he narrated that the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) said to the women: Whoever loses three of her children in childhood, before they reach the age of accountability, when no sins have been recorded against them, this calamity will be a shield for her, a barrier that will protect her from the Fire. A woman said: What about one who loses two of her children; will she have the same reward as one who loses three? And the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) said, “Or two.” So if two of a woman’s children die during her lifetime, that calamity will be a shield for her that will protect her from entering the Fire. This ruling applies only to children who have not reached the age of puberty, because parents’ hearts are more compassionate and more attached to a small child, in a way that is not applicable in the case of a child who has reached adulthood, because in the case of a child who has reached adulthood, in most cases he has invariably gone against his parents.
And it was said that the ruling stipulated the condition of three children at first, because three comes under the heading of many. A believer may be afflicted with the loss of one child, but his faith is strong enough to enable him to bear the calamity with patience, but he may not be able to bear it if it happens again. Hence the one who goes through repeated calamities and bears them with patience is more deserving of great reward. A child is one of the greatest joys that a person may have in life, to the extent that he would willingly sacrifice himself for his child. This is what is usually the case with people, and even with animals, hence the Messenger of Allah (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) referred to the worst type of calamity, and urged people to bear it with patience and perseverance.
This hadith was addressed to the women; however, al-Bukhaari narrated from Abu Hurayrah (may Allah be pleased with him) that the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) said: “No Muslim who loses three of his children in death will ever enter the Fire, except in fulfilment of the oath.” This includes both men and women..

103
It was narrated from Ibn Abi Mulaykah that if ‘A’ishah, the wife of the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him), heard something that she was not aware of, she would ask questions about it until she understood it. The Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) said: “Whoever is brought to account will be punished.” ‘A’ishah said: I said: O Messenger of Allah, but doesn’t Allah say, {He will be judged with an easy account} [al-Inshiqaq 84:8]? He said: “That refers to the presentation of accounts, but whoever is subjected to a detailed review of his account will be doomed.”.

Commentary : The Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) was the ultimate reference for clarifying anything that was not clear in people’s minds regarding their religion, and the Sahabah (may Allah be pleased with them) were keen to refer to him with regard to any issues they faced and did not understand.
In this hadith, ‘Abdullah ibn Abi Mulaikah narrated that ‘A’ishah, the wife of the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) did not hear anything that she did not understand but she would ask the one who said it for clarification, or she would ask the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) about it, so that she could verify it and determine how correct or otherwise it was. This was a sign of her intelligence and smartness, that she would not believe everything she heard when she could check everything with the Messenger of Allah (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him).
Then ‘A’ishah (may Allah be pleased with her) narrated that the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) said: “Whoever is brought to account will be punished.” So ‘A’ishah (may Allah be pleased with him) compared what the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) said with the words of Allah (may He be exalted): {He will be judged with an easy account} [al-Inshiqaq 84:8]. The wording of the hadith is general in meaning, and indicates that anyone who is brought to account will be punished, whereas the wording of the verse indicates that some people will not be punished. The Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) responded to her by saying: “That refers to the presentation of accounts, but whoever is subjected to a detailed review of his account will be doomed.” The Prophet’s response explained the true meaning of the verse, that the easy reckoning is something else, namely the presentation of accounts, which refers to showing deeds or making them known, in which Allah will remind a person of what sins he committed, then He will pardon them, so that he will realize how gracious Allah was to him when He concealed his sins in the previous world and pardoned him for them in the hereafter. On the other hand, whoever is subjected to a detailed review of his account will be doomed, and what is meant is that falling short is something that most people do, so whoever is subjected to a detailed discussion of his account and is not pardoned will be doomed and will enter Hell.
The reckoning on the Day of Resurrection is of two types: the presentation of accounts and rebuke, which is an easy reckoning in which there is no punishment, and a detailed review of the account, which is a difficult and hard reckoning, which will not be without punishment, because it will involve examining the individual’s sins in detail, covering all of his sins, and no sin will be left without being pointed out and discussed.
This hadith highlights the virtue of ‘A’ishah (may Allah be pleased with her) and her eagerness to learn and verify facts.
It is also an affirmation of the reckoning, presentation of accounts, and punishment on the Day of Resurrection, and that the reckoning will vary from one person to another.
It indicates that it is permissible to debate and compare what the Sunnah says and what the Qur’an says.
It indicates that the seeker of knowledge has the right to ask about what he does not understand, and to raise the issue with his teacher.
It indicates that scholars or knowledgeable people should welcome any questions that are referred to them, and answer the questions of one who is seeking to understand, as the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) did..

104
It was narrated from Abu Shurayh that he said to ‘Amr ibn Sa‘id – when he was sending the expeditions to Makkah – Give me permission, O governor, to tell you about something that I heard from the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) in a speech on the morning of the day of the conquest [of Makkah]. My ears heard it, my heart understood it and my eyes saw him when he said it. He praised and glorified Allah, then he said: “It is Allah Who made Makkah sacred; people did not make it sacred. It is not permissible for anyone who believes in Allah and the Last Day to shed blood in it, or to cut down trees in it. If anyone uses as an excuse the fact that the Messenger of Allah (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) fought in it, then say: Allah gave permission to His Messenger but He did not give permission to you. Rather I was only given permission [to fight] in it for part of a day, then its sanctity is restored today as it was yesterday. Let those who are present convey to those who are absent.” It was said to Abu Shurayh: What did ‘Amr say to you? He said: I have more knowledge of that than you, O Abu Shurayh. The Haram does not offer protection to a sinner, or to a fugitive who killed someone, or a fugitive who committed theft..

Commentary : Conveying Islamic knowledge is something required of the scholars and knowledgeable people, and it is more obligatory at times of tribulation and hardship, so that they may explain to the people what is true and what is false, and explain to them the path of guidance.
In this hadith, Abu Shurayh al-Khuza‘i (may Allah be pleased with him) – the well-known Sahabi who was one of the wise men of Madinah – narrates that he asked ‘Amr ibn Sa‘id, the governor of Madinah appointed by Yazid ibn Mu‘awiyah at that time, to give him permission to tell him something that he had heard from the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him). ‘Amr ibn Sa‘id was sending troops to Makkah to fight ‘Abdullah ibn az-Zubayr (may Allah be pleased with him) for having refused to swear allegiance to Yazid ibn Mu‘awiyah and having fortified himself in the Haram. Abu Shurayh (may Allah be pleased with him) asked him to let him narrate to him a hadith that he had heard from the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him), affirming that he had heard it with his own ears, understood it and memorized it, indicating that it was still as fresh in his mind as when he had heard it from the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him), without any intermediary, and he had not forgotten it. The Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) had spoken this hadith on the morning of the conquest of Makkah in 8 AH. When he referred to a speech that the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) had given, he was referring to words that the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) addressed to the people, in which he explained that it was Allah (may He be exalted) Himself who had made Makkah sacred in His Book, where He said: {Al-Masjid-al-Haram (at Makkah) which We have made (open) to (all) men, the dweller in it and the visitor from the country are equal there (as regards its sanctity and pilgrimage (Hajj and Umrah))} [al-Hajj 22:25] and {[Say, O Muhammad], “I have only been commanded to worship the Lord of this city, who made it sacred”} [al-Naml 27:91]. So it is not permissible for anyone who believes in Allah and the Last Day to shed blood in it, by fighting or otherwise, or to cut down its trees. If anyone regards it as permissible to fight in Makkah, quoting as evidence for that the fact that the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) fought therein on the day of the conquest, the response to that is that Allah gave permission to His Messenger (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) to fight in it on that day for a brief part of the day. What is meant is that it was a limited time, a certain part of the day of the conquest, and He did not give permission to you and it is not permissible for you to ever fight in it. Then its sanctity was restored as it had been.
Then the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) instructed his companions who were listening to this speech of his to convey it to those who came after them, whether at the time of the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) or afterwards, so that they would be careful and would not have the audacity to transgress against that which Allah (may He be glorified and exalted) had made sacred, especially for one who wanted to shed blood and prepared himself for that, as in the case of ‘Amr ibn Sa‘id. This is what prompted Abu Shurayh (may Allah be pleased with him) to narrate this hadith to him, as instructed by the Messenger of Allah (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him).
Abu Shurayh was asked: How did ‘Amr respond to you? And he replied: He said to me: I know better than you, O Abu Shurayh, that the sanctuary of Makkah does not protect a sinner from the hadd punishment being carried out on him, and it does not protect a fugitive who has committed murder and seeks sanctuary in Makkah so that he will not be punished. The phrase “committed theft” means that there is no protection for a fugitive who committed theft; a variant reading suggests that there is no protection for one who spread heretical ideas. ‘Amr’s response consists of words that appear sound, but were aimed at justifying his wrong actions, because the Sahabi was denouncing him for waging war on Makkah, but he responded that Makkah did not prevent the carrying out of retaliatory punishments (qisas). Ibn az-Zubayr had not committed any sin that deserved such punishment, so this was not a valid response to the words of Abu Shurayh, because he did not differ with him with regard to the issue of someone who committed a sin that incurred a hadd punishment outside the Haram zone then sought refuge in the Haram zone and whether it was permissible to carry out the hadd punishment on him within the Haram zone or not. Rather what Abu Shurayh objected to was the sending of troops to Makkah, violating its sanctity and waging war on it. He presented his argument well, but ‘Amr’s response was not straightforward; rather he gave a response that had nothing to do with the question, because in his answer he referred to a man who had committed an action that incurred a hadd punishment outside the Haram zone, and whether entering the Haram zone would protect him or not. This may be regarded as going off topic and showing stubbornness when debating, because he was a governor who had instructions from the caliph, so he tried hard to find a justification for his actions by presenting any argument he could.
This hadith indicates that one should transmit knowledge and spread the Sunnah and Islamic rulings.
It indicates that one should be gentle when objecting, especially when speaking to those in authority and discussing issues that are contrary to their aims, because that makes it more likely that they will accept one’s argument.
It indicates that one should offer sincere advice to those in authority, and not be dishonest or harsh with them, if one feels confident that that will not lead to trouble.
It indicates that what is halal and haram is determined by Allah (may He be exalted), and it has nothing to do with people. In all matters, whether they pertain to this world or the hereafter, reference should be made to the religious texts, and that can only be known from the actions, words and approval of the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him).
It highlights the great and honourable status of Makkah, may Allah increase it in honour and greatness.
It indicates that it is prescribed to make analogies with the actions of the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him), except in matters which were specifically and exclusively for him.
It indicates that there are some matters which apply exclusively to the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) and not to anyone else.
It also highlights the virtue of Abu Shurayh, because he followed the command of the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) to convey teachings from him..

105
It was narrated from Abu Bakrah that it was mentioned that the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) said: “… for your blood and your wealth” – Muhammad [ibn Sirin] said: And I think he said – “and your honour are sacred to you, as sacred as this day of yours, in this month of yours. O people, let those of you who are present convey to those who are absent.” – Muhammad [ibn Sirin] used to say: The Messenger of Allah (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) spoke the truth, and that is what indeed happened. – “O people, have I conveyed the message?” [He said that] twice..

Commentary : 1536.

1510
Abu Hurayrah (may Allah be pleased with him) reported that the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) said: "No son can repay a father unless he finds him a slave and buys him and emancipates him." Another version reads: "No son can repay his father.".

Commentary : The right that children owe to their parents is great, and being dutiful to them in Islam is among the greatest means of drawing closer to Allah, as Allah has made dutifulness to them one of the broadest ways of reaching Paradise. Allah has also made not obeying them among the major sins and misdeeds that lead their perpetrators to disgracing punishment.
In this Hadīth, the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) clarifies that the child, whether male or female, cannot repay his father - the mother is included and so are the grandparents who are the same as the parents - and fulfill his right in full for his kindness towards him except when he finds his father a slave, buys him with his own money, and emancipates him and sets him free. In other words, the son seeks to reach him by buying him, and it is well known that he only buys him to free him from slavery, not to have him as his own slave or to be the master of his father. So, nothing fulfills the father's right over his son, no matter what the son does, except this act. This is because Islam came when slavery and serfdom were widespread and a common habit of the Arabs, and there were bondmaids and slaves in every house.
It was said: If a man took possession of his father, the latter would be free by mere possession and [there is] no need to say: I set him free. Similarly, if he took possession of his mother, she would be free by mere possession and [there is] no need to say: I set her free.
The Hadīth encourages children to be dutiful and kind to their parents.
It also denotes the merit of emancipating slaves..

1513
Abu Hurayrah reported: The Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) forbade the Hasāh sale (throwing pebble sale) and the Gharar sale (uncertainty sale)..

Commentary : During the pre-Islamic era of ignorance, there prevailed types of transactions that involved massive oppression and injustice. When Islam came, it established fair sales and forbade whatever involved oppression. Hence, it forbade what involved fraud and ambiguity to stop disagreement and dispute among people, which is one of the Shariah-approved objectives.
In this Hadīth, Abu Hurayrah (may Allah be pleased with him) narrates that the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) forbade the Hasāh sale, which was one of the sales practiced by the people of Jāhiliyyah. If the seller or the buyer threw a pebble, that would be a sign of finalizing the sale. It had three forms: First: The seller says to the buyer: I would sell you of these garments that on which the pebble I throw falls; or: I would sell you a piece of this land from here to the part that this pebble reaches. Second: Considering the act of throwing the pebble itself a sale by saying: If you throw the pebble at this garment, it will be sold to you at such-and-such. Third: Saying: You have the option to either accept or reject the sale until I throw this pebble. It was said: It means saying: Throw the pebble and whatever number comes out, I will be entitled to an equal number of dinars or dirhams. All these are forms of invalid sales that entail doing injustice to one of the two parties of the sale.
The Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) also forbade the Gharar sale. Gharar means danger, delusion, and deceit. This is a generalization after a specification, as it includes any sale that involves any kind of deceit, or that which is ambiguous or cannot be fulfilled. One of the rationales behind forbidding this sale is the fact that it is a waste of money, for one may not be able to get the sold item, which means that he spent his money in vain.
The Hadīth prohibits deception and fraud in sales.
It warns against consuming people's properties wrongfully.
It also points out that the object of a sale transaction must be something known and must have a known price..

1519
Abu Hurayrah (may Allah be pleased with him) reported that the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) said: Do not go out to meet what is being brought for trade. Whoever goes out to meet it and buys something thereof, when its master comes to the market, he will have the option..

Commentary : Selling and buying have rulings and etiquettes in Islam that a Muslim must adhere to fulfill justice in transactions and enjoy the pleasures of this worldly life and the Hereafter.
In this Hadīth, the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) forbids merchants from going out and receiving those people who transport commodities from one country to another. They must not receive them before arriving and being acquainted with the prices of commodities in such a country because this might harm the seller as they might buy from him at a lower price than its known price, which would result in harming the owner of the commodity by underestimating its price. Hence, the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) commanded the one who goes out to meet it and buys something thereof, and does not comply with the prohibition. So when "its master," i.e., the owner of the commodity, comes to the market, he will have the option either to effect the sale or take back his goods, for perhaps he did him injustice and wronged him regarding its price compared to its price in this country.
The Hadīth encourages truthfulness and transparency and the avoidance of deceit in commercial transactions.
It shows the Prophet's keenness on whatever brings goodness to his Ummah and his kindness towards them even when it comes to worldly interests..

1525
Ibn ‘Abbās reported that the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) said: Whoever buys food should not sell it until he measures it. I said to Ibn ‘Abbās: Why? He said: Do you not see them transacting with gold, whereas the food is deferred?.

Commentary : Allah Almighty has prescribed in sale what maintains people's rights, keeps them away from conflicts and quarrels, and repels harm from them.
In this Hadīth, the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) advises us saying that whoever buys food and wants to resell it, he "should not sell it" until he takes it after being measured and weighed. This is an indirect reference that the buyer should receive it and it becomes in his possession and knows its amount in a way that negates ambiguity. This is related to what is sold by measure as in this case, so it must be first measured until he receives it in full, then, he may sell it afterward. It is not lawful for him to sell it before measuring it, as it could be subject to excess or deficiency, which entails doing injustice and harm either to the seller or the buyer. Thereupon, Tāwūs ibn Kaysān - from the Tābi‘is - asked Ibn ‘Abbās (may Allah be pleased with him and his father): "Why?" i.e., why did the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) stipulate this condition? Ibn ‘Abbās (may Allah be pleased with him and his father) said: "Do you not see them transacting with gold, whereas the food is deferred?" In other words, the seller used to take the price in gold dinars, and then he would delay the delivery of food to the buyer. Therefore, the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) stipulated that the buyer should not resell it until he receives it and it becomes in his possession. Another Hadīth in the two Sahīh Collections clarified that what he meant by that is to transfer the food to another place or to the markets where it is sold in order not to be monopolized or manipulate its price. So, he made it clear that the right thing is to transfer it to the markets, which are known to people, where food is sold and to take possession of it, since Qabd (taking possession) is a condition, and transferring it as mentioned fulfills this condition.
Moreover, in the two Sahīh Collections, the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) forbade reselling the food after buying it until he receives it in full, i.e., he should not adopt any procedure or dispose of it by selling it again unless he first takes what he has purchased and it becomes in his full possession. Only then, he can resell it. This guarantees preventing any harm to the seller, the buyer, or the dwellers of this country that could result in disputes and conflicts between people and, thus, inflict harm upon them.
The Hadīth shows the Prophet's keenness on whatever brings goodness to his Ummah and his kindness towards them even when it comes to worldly interests.
It highlights the prohibition of adopting sale methods that lead to the monopoly of goods and the rise in prices, or that cause harm to the parties involved in the sale transaction..

1530
Jābir ibn ‘Abdullāh reported: The Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) forbade selling a heap of dried dates, whose measure is unknown, for a specified amount of dried dates..

Commentary : The rulings of sale transactions in Islam revolve around honesty and the absence of uncertainty among the parties involved in the sale. The sold item must be known to both parties, in terms of type, quantity, and quality, in such a way that removes any ambiguity. The Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) forbade certain kinds of sales that involve Jahālah (ambiguity), Gharar (uncertainty), and Riba (usury).
This Hadīth clarifies some of these forbidden kinds of sales. Jābir ibn ‘Abdullah (may Allah be pleased with him and his father) narrates that the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him): "Forbade selling a heap of dried dates, whose measure is unknown," "Subrah" (heap): food that is collected in a pile and whose weight and quantity are unknown. This applies to all types of food; however, he mentioned here one type in particular, namely the dried dates, because it is their staple food; otherwise, the mentioned prohibition includes all types of measured food. In Muslim's version, he did not mention his saying: "of dried dates" at the end of the Hadīth, which indicates the inclusion of all types of food sold without knowing its amount in exchange for a known amount of its like. "For a specified amount of dried dates," i.e., he forbade selling an unknown amount for a known amount of the same type, like dried dates for dried dates, wheat for wheat, and barley for barley, as this involves ambiguity regarding the unmeasured food from one aspect besides involving Riba al-Fadl (usury of surplus) from another aspect, bearing in mind that ignorance about the equality between the sold and purchased items is like knowing that there is a surplus between them, which is clear Riba. If the items subject to Riba rulings are the same, then, they must be the same in measure and hand to hand. However, if they are of different types, then, there is nothing wrong with the surplus between them like in the case of selling dried dates for wheat, or barley for corn, and the same applies to selling for cash, gold, or silver.
The Hadīth clarifies how the Shariah regulates the process of selling and buying to avoid the occurrence of disputes..

1536
Jābir reported: The Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) forbade leasing land and selling it ahead for years, and selling fruits before ripening..

Commentary : In the pre-Islamic era of ignorance, there prevailed types of sale that brimmed with oppression and injustice. When Islam came, it established fair sales and forbade everything involving oppression. Hence, it forbade cheating in sale transactions. Putting an end to disputes and conflicts between the seller and the buyer is one of the objectives of the Shariah.
In this Hadīth, Jābir ibn ‘Abdullah (may Allah be pleased with him and his father) reports that the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) forbade "leasing land", which is renting it. The forbidden lease is that which is in return for some of its produce, which means that the rent agreed upon between the owner and the lessee is an amount specified from the beginning of the fruits produced by this land, which may or may not produce this amount. In this case, the one who cultivates it will not be capable of fulfilling his contract. However, there is nothing wrong with leasing land in return for gold, silver, or cash, as in the two Sahīh Collections, Hanzhalah ibn Qays reported: "That he asked Rāfi‘ ibn Khadīj about leasing land, and he said: The Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) forbade leasing land. He said: I said: Even in return for gold and silver? He said: If it is in return for gold and silver, there is no harm in it." Also in the two Sahīh Collections, Ibn ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him and his father) reported: "The Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) agreed with the people of Khaybar to work and cultivate in return for half of the fruits or crops produced." Therefore, the owner is allowed to lease it in return for a standard percentage of what is cultivated therein, like one-fourth or one-third of its produce.
He also forbade "selling it in advance for years." A version of Muslim reads: "Selling fruits in advance for years," which is selling the fruits of trees and palm trees for two years or more, knowing that such fruits have not been created yet. This is a Gharar sale (uncertain sale) because it involves selling something non-existent, ambiguous, undeliverable, and not owned by the contractor. So, it is a sale that involves a great deal of uncertainty and ambiguity.
The Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) also forbade "selling fruits before ripening," i.e., appearing to be ripe when it becomes colorful and its fruit appears and it becomes red or yellow, which is a sign of its good condition and safety from blight, and it becomes suitable for eating and selling.
The Hadīth shows the prohibition of every sale that involves ambiguity..

1536
Jābir ibn ‘Abdullāh reported: The Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) forbade taking of rent or share of land..

Commentary : In the pre-Islamic era of ignorance, there prevailed types of sales that brimmed with oppression and injustice. When Islam came, it established fair sales and forbade whatever involved oppression. Hence, it forbade whatever involved fraud, uncertainty, and ambiguity to put an end to disputes and conflicts among people, which is one of the Shariah-approved objectives.
During the time of the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him), people used to lease their cultivated lands with contracts that either included an ambiguous rent or entailed injustice to the tenant. Hence, the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) forbade taking rent or share of the land to prevent such contracts. The rent or share here means: The rent agreed upon between the owner, and the lessee is an amount specified from the beginning of the fruits produced by this land, and the land may produce this amount and may not, in which case the one who cultivates it will not be capable of fulfilling his contract. Hence, this was forbidden so they would not deceive the other or wrongfully consume his brother's property.
As for leasing in return for gold, silver, or cash, there is nothing wrong with it, as in the two Sahīh Collections - the wording is that of Muslim - Hanzhalah ibn Qays reported: "That he asked Rāfi‘ ibn Khadīj about leasing land, and he said: The Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) forbade leasing land. He said: I said: Even in return for gold and silver? He said: If it is in return for gold and silver, there is no harm in it." Also in the two Sahīh Collections, Ibn ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him and his father) reported: "The Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) agreed with the people of Khaybar to work and cultivate in return for half of the fruits or crops produced." Therefore, the owner is allowed to lease it in return for a standard percentage of what is cultivated therein, like one-fourth or one-third of its produce..

1536
Jābir reported: The Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) forbade the sale of produce several years in advance. Another version reads: Selling fruits years in advance..

Commentary : Islam cares about protecting people's properties and is keen on not wasting them. It has clarified the manner of dealing with fixed assets and cash and how to manage selling and buying in such a way that guarantees the absence of uncertainty between the transactors and the removal of ambiguity from the sold item.
In this Hadīth, Jābir ibn ‘Abdullah (may Allah be pleased with him and his father) narrates that the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) forbade the sale of selling in advance, or selling fruits years in advance, which is selling the fruits of trees and palm trees for two years or more, knowing that such fruits have not been created yet. This is a Gharar sale (a sale of uncertainty) because it involves selling something non-existent, ambiguous, undeliverable, and not owned by the contractor. So, it is a sale that involves a great deal of uncertainty and ambiguity.
One of the rationales behind this prohibition is the waste of money involved as the sold item might not be achieved, and he would have, thus, spent his money in vain.
The Hadīth shows the Prophet's keenness to establish financial relations among people based on sound grounds to protect the rights of all parties involved..

1536
Jābir reported: The Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) forbade selling the white land (uncultivated land) for two or three years..

Commentary : Islam cares about protecting people's property and is keen on not wasting them. It has clarified the manner of dealing with fixed assets and cash and how to manage selling and buying in such a way that guarantees the absence of uncertainty between the transactors and the removal of ambiguity from the sold item.
In this Hadīth, Jābir ibn ‘Abdullah (may Allah be pleased with him and his father) narrates that the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) forbade selling the white land, which is the land that has no trees or plants. What is meant by selling it here is its "Kirā’" (leasing), which means taking a share of the fruits as a rent for the land. It was called "sale" because it refers to selling a benefit. His saying: "Two or three years" indicates that the land may not yield a product during one of the contract years. Hence, its cultivator will need to fulfill his contract. For this reason, the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) made the original state of the land dominant in the contract so that none of them would deceive the other or consume his brother's property wrongfully.
As for leasing in return for gold, silver, or cash, there is nothing wrong with that, for in the two Sahīh Collections - the wording is that of Muslim - Hanzhalah ibn Qays reported: "That he asked Rāfi‘ ibn Khadīj about leasing land, and he said: The Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) forbade leasing land. He said: I said: Even in return for gold and silver? He said: If it is in return for gold and silver, there is no harm with that."
The Prohibition in this Hadīth is from uncertainty in leasing land in return for something ambiguous or not guaranteed of its fruits and how the transaction should be transparent and known to avoid discord and wasting people's properties..

1541
Abu Hurayrah reported: the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) gave a concession for the sale of ‘Arāyā (unpicked ripe dates for dry dates) by estimation when they are less than - or he said: equal to - five Wasqs (a standard measure)..

Commentary : In the pre-Islamic era of ignorance, there were types of Riba-based sales. When Islam came, it rectified and refined such sale transactions and established the fair sale, which is free from Riba (usury). It forbade all types of sales that involve a possibility of Riba and that involve injustice.
In this Hadīth, Abu Hurayrah (may Allah be pleased with him) reports that the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) "gave a concession," i.e., allowed and permitted, "the sale of ‘Arāyā": A type of sale that takes the following form: Buying fresh dates after becoming ripe on the date palms for dry dates. So, the fruits on the date palm are given to the needy to eat therefrom whenever they like. What is on the date palms is estimated and dry dates are taken in exchange. It was called the ‘Arāya sale because the owner of the date palm gives it to a needy person, i.e., he strips it of its fruits for his sake. However, the Shariah set a condition that this should be done "by estimation," i.e., with a similar number of dried dates for the unpicked fruits. This is because some people would witness the season of ripe dates and wish to feed their children therefrom while having no date palms or money. Hence, the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) wanted to show kindness to them. He also stipulated that this should be of a measure or weight less than "five Wasqs", and the "Wasq" is a standard measure that is equal to sixty Sā‘s, i.e. (130.5kg) one hundred thirty kilograms and a half. Therefore, five Wasqs are equal to almost (653kg) six hundred fifty-three kilograms.
This means: The Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) granted them a concession regarding this kind of sale with this amount only because it could be mistakenly thought to be Riba, as the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) forbade selling fruits for fruits of the same type, which is called a Muzābanah sale (selling something definite for an indefinite amount of its kind). It is as if the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) made for them the exception of the ‘Arāya sale from Muzābanah and restricted it to five Wasqs to avoid the possibility of Riba.
His saying: "Or equal to five Wasqs" refers to the doubt that one of the Hadīth narrators had, and he was Dāwūd ibn al-Husayn, as he did not remember whether it was five Wasqs or less than five Wasqs.
The Hadīth clarifies the concession granted regarding one of the sale transactions out of alleviation and facilitation for the Ummah.
It also points out that the specified amount in the ‘Arāya sale transactions is five Wasqs..

1547
Ibn ‘Umar reported: We did not see anything wrong with Khibr until last year when Rāfi‘ claimed that the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) forbade it. [Another version reads]: So, we abandoned it on account of that. [Another version reads]: Rāfi‘ has forbidden us from benefitting from our land..

Commentary : In the pre-Islamic era of ignorance, there prevailed types of sale that brimmed with oppression and injustice. When Islam came, it established fair sales and forbade whatever involved oppression. Hence, it forbade whatever involved fraud, uncertainty, and ambiguity to put an end to disputes and conflicts among people, which is one of the Shariah-approved objectives.
In this Hadīth, ‘Abdullah ibn ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him and his father) reports that they used to see nothing wrong with Khibr, i.e., they used to practice Mukhābarah (sharecropping), which is leasing the land in return for part of its produce, and the seed or sowing part is from the worker (the lessee). Things continued this way until the year preceding that year when Ibn ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him and his father) was narrating this Hadīth. A version of Muslim reads: "Ibn ‘Umar used to rent his farms during the time of the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him), and during the rule of Abu Bakr, ‘Umar, ‘Uthmān, and the early days of Mu‘āwiyah's caliphate until it was conveyed to him at the end of Mu‘āwiyah's caliphate." As Rāfi‘ ibn Khadīj (may Allah be pleased with him) reported that the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) forbade Mukhābarah. Thereupon, Ibn ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him and his father) refrained from Mukhābarah on account of what was narrated by Rāfi‘ (may Allah be pleased with him) from the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him).
In another version, Ibn ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him and his father) said: "Rāfi‘ has, indeed, forbidden us from benefitting from our land," i.e., Rāfi‘ ibn Khadīj (may Allah be pleased with him) forbade us from benefitting from our land through Mukhābarah.
Ibn ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him and his father) did not ask Rafi‘ for details about what was meant by the prohibition. In the two Sahīh Collections, Hanzhalah ibn Qays reported: "That he asked Rāfi‘ ibn Khadīj about leasing land, and he said: The Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) forbade leasing land. He said: I said: Even in return for gold and silver? He said: If it is in return for gold and silver, there is no harm in it." Also in the two Sahīh Collections, Ibn ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him and his father) reported: "The Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) agreed with the people of Khaybar to work and cultivate in return for half of the fruits or crops produced." Therefore, it is permissible for the owner to rent it in return for a standard percentage of what is cultivated therein, like one-fourth or one-third of its produce. The prohibition refers to whatever involves risk, ambiguity, and uncertainty. The most famous among such transactions was where the landowner used to specify for himself part of the land and what it produces..

1547
Hanzhalah ibn Qays al-Ansāri reported: I asked Rāfi‘ ibn Khadīj about leasing land in return for gold and silver, he replied: "There is no harm in it. At the time of the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) the people used to lease lands in return for the yield of what grows on the banks of large rivers and the beginnings of water streams or the yield of certain parts of the land. Some of the harvest would be destroyed and some would remain safe. This was the only system the people had for renting lands, and thus, he forbade it. If the rent is something known and guaranteed, there is no harm in it.".

Commentary : During the pre-Islamic era of ignorance, there prevailed types of transactions that involved massive oppression and injustice. When Islam came, it established fair sales and forbade whatever involved oppression. Hence, it forbade what entailed fraud, uncertainty, and ambiguity to stop discord and dispute among people, which is one of the Shariah-approved objectives. At the time of the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him), people used to lease lands in return for a share of the yield as rent. The Tābi‘i Hanzhalah ibn Qays al-Ansāri asked the Companion Rāfi‘ ibn Khadīj (may Allah be pleased with him) about leasing it, i.e., renting it in return for gold and silver, which are meant here to refer to the dinar and dirham. This is a question about leasing land in return for gold and silver instead of leasing it in return for part of the yield. Rāfi‘ (may Allah be pleased with him) replied that there is no objection to leasing land in return for gold and silver, and he said: "At the time of the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) the people used to lease lands in return for the yield of what grows on the banks of large rivers," which are the watercourses coming from the wide river. It was said: What grows on the banks of the watercourse, and it was said: What grows around the brooklets. "And the beginnings of water streams," which are the beginnings of small rivers, "or the yield of certain parts of the land," i.e., types of the cultivated crops. This means: the owner allocates to himself the parts that would yield the best fruits or the finest crops, and the rest is for the tenant.
Rāfi‘ said: "Some of the harvest would be destroyed and some would remain safe," i.e., either the harvest of the owner or that of the tenant is destroyed, so one of them is wronged. "This was the only system the people had for renting lands, and thus, he forbade it," i.e., the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) prohibited this kind of rent given the Jahālah (ambiguity) that it involved, and Jahālah is Gharar (uncertainty). If the rent, however, is something known and guaranteed, i.e., a known rent in cash, then there is no objection to leasing the land in return for such rent.
The Hadīth points out the permissibility of leasing land in return for a known amount of cash money..

1548
Rāfi‘ ibn Khadīj reported: At the time of the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him), we used to lease land based on Muhāqalah so that we would lease it in return for one-third or one-quarter of the yield or a specified amount of food. One day, a man from among my paternal uncles came and said: The Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) has forbidden us from something beneficial for us, but obedience to Allah and His Messenger is more beneficial for us. He has forbidden us to lease land based on Muhāqalah and to lease it in return for one-third or one-quarter of the yield and for a specified amount of food. He commanded the landowner to cultivate it or to give it to someone else to cultivate. He disliked leasing it or anything else. [Another version reads]: We used to lease land based on Muhāqalah, leasing it in return for one-third or one-quarter of the yield..

Commentary : In the pre-Islamic era of ignorance, there prevailed types of sale that brimmed with oppression and injustice. When Islam came, it established fair sales and forbade whatever involved oppression. Hence, it forbade whatever involved fraud, uncertainty, and ambiguity to end disputes and conflicts among people, which is one of the Shariah-approved objectives.
In this Hadīth, Rāfi‘ ibn Khadīj (may Allah be pleased with him) reports that they used to lease land based on Muhāqalah during the time of the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him). There are different opinions regarding the meaning of Muhāqalah. It is said: It means leasing the land in return for wheat, as interpreted in some versions, which is called Muhārathah by the cultivators. It is said: It means the cultivation of land in return for a known share of its produce, like one-third, one-fourth, or the like as mentioned in this Hadīth. It is said: It means selling food in its ears in return for wheat grains. It is said: It means selling crops before fully growing. His saying: "And for a specified amount of food," i.e., by taking a specified share of the fruits as a rent for the land, and all this entails ambiguity in the contract between the owner and the lessee. Then, Rāfi '(may Allah be pleased with him) reported that things continued in this way until one day, one of his paternal uncles - it is said: His uncle Zhahīr ibn Rāfi '- came and informed them that the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) forbade them from something beneficial for them, referring to Muhāqalah, which was what they obtained in return for using the land so that they would benefit and the worker would benefit as well. However, this benefit, in fact, is a partial benefit, and perhaps it will not be safe from harm, as its fruits might be ruined, which would lead to the loss of the right of one of them. "But obedience to Allah and His Messenger is more beneficial for us," i.e., obeying Allah and His Messenger (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) to what he guides us is more beneficial for us than this assumed benefit of Kirā’ and Muzāra‘ah that we used to practice. In fact, responding to the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) is better and more beneficial for their religion and worldly life. One of their ways of practicing Muhāqalah was leasing land in return for one-third or one-fourth of its yield or a specified amount of food, i.e., by taking a share of the fruits as a rent for the land. So, the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) commanded the landowner to cultivate it himself or give it to someone to cultivate. The Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) disliked "leasing it or anything else," i.e., anything related to leasing. It is said: This was during the early days of emigration out of compassion for them; they had either to cultivate it or to let it be cultivated by others from their emigrant brothers. Then, he (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) granted a concession for leasing. It was reported that there is no harm in leasing in return for gold, silver, or cash, as in the two Sahīh Collections, Hanzhalah ibn Qays reported: "That he asked Rāfi‘ ibn Khadīj about leasing land, and he said: The Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) forbade leasing land. He said: I said: Even in return for gold and silver? He said: If it is in return for gold and silver, there is no harm in it." Also in the two Sahīh Collections, Ibn ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him and his father) reported: "The Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) agreed with the people of Khaybar to work and cultivate in return for half of the fruits or crops produced." Therefore, it is permissible for the owner to rent it in return for a standard percentage of what is cultivated therein, like one-fourth or one-third of its produce. The prohibition refers to whatever involves risk, ambiguity, and uncertainty. The most famous among such transactions was where the landowner used to specify for himself part of the land and what it produced.
The Hadīth highlights the fact that Allah Almighty and His Messenger (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) never forbid benefits and interests; rather, they forbid evil consequences and whatever leads to them..

1549
‘Abdullah ibn as-Sā’ib reported: We entered upon ‘Abdullah ibn Ma‘qil and asked him about Muzāra‘ah (sharecropping). He said: Thābit claimed that the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) forbade Muzāra‘ah and commanded Mu’ājarah (leasing land for rent), and he said: There is no harm in it..

Commentary : In the pre-Islamic era of ignorance, there prevailed types of sales that brimmed with oppression and injustice. When Islam came, it established fair sales and forbade whatever involved oppression. Hence, it forbade whatever involved fraud, uncertainty, and ambiguity to end disputes and conflicts among people, which is one of the Shariah-approved objectives.
In this Hadīth, Thābit ibn ad-Dahhāk (may Allah be pleased with him) reports that the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) forbade Muzāra‘ah, which is leasing the land in return for part of it and working on the land for part of its fruit production. The prohibition here refers to whatever involves risk, ambiguity, and uncertainty, and the most famous among such transactions was the one where the landowner used to specify for himself part of the land and what it produced. However, apart from this, it is permissible for the owner to lease it for a standard percentage of what is cultivated therein, like one-fourth or one-third of its produce, as it is mentioned in the two Sahīh Collections that Ibn ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him and his father) reported: "The Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) agreed with the people of Khaybar to work and cultivate in return for half of the fruits or crops produced."
The Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) commanded and made it permissible for them to practice Mu’ājarah instead of Muzāra‘ah and it means taking a known rent in gold, silver, or cash because this kind of lease is the farthest from uncertainty and ambiguity. In the two Sahīh Collections, Hanzhalah ibn Qays reported: "That he asked Rāfi‘ ibn Khadīj about leasing land, and he said: The Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) forbade leasing land. He said: I said: Even in return for gold and silver? He said: If it is in return for gold and silver, there is no harm in it.".

1551
Ibn ‘Umar reported: 'Umar ibn al-Khattāb expelled the Jews and the Christians from the land of Hijāz, and when the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) conquered Khaybar, he wanted to expel the Jews from that place, for when the land was conquered, it came to belong to Allah, His Messenger, and the Muslims. Hence, he wanted to expel the Jews from it. However, the Jews asked the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) to leave them there on condition that they should do all its work and have half the produce. The Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) said to them: We shall leave you there on that condition for as long as we wish. So, they stayed there until ‘Umar expelled them to Taymā’ and Arīhā’..

Commentary : Some of the Jewish tribes were living in Madīnah, and they kept betraying Muslims and breaching their covenants with the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) during his lifetime and with his Companions after his death. So, some of them made covenants with them, whereas others declared war against them.
In this Hadīth, ‘Abdullah ibn ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him and his father) reports that the Caliph ‘Umar ibn al-Khattāb (may Allah be pleased with him) expelled the Jews and the Christians, i.e., he deported them from the land of Hijāz, namely Makkah and Madīnah and their surroundings.
Ibn ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him and his father) reports that when the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) gained victory over the people of Khaybar and overcame them in the seventh year of Hijrah, and it was a village inhabited by the Jews almost 168 kilometers away from Madīnah from the direction of the Levant, he (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) wanted to expel the Jews from it, for when the land of Khaybar was conquered by Muslims, it became a possession of Allah, His Messenger, and Muslims. This clearly shows that the land was no longer owned by the Jews after being conquered by Muslims; rather, the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) distributed it among the victorious Muslims and it became among their possessions. What is meant by it being a possession of Allah and His Messenger is that some of its shares were given to the Muslims' public treasury.
On knowing that the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) wanted to deport them from Khaybar, the Jews asked him to allow them to stay in it and leave them on condition that they would work therein in the trees and the land in return for half of its fruits, whereas the other half would be for him, and he (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) agreed to the condition they stipulated for themselves. His saying: "For as long as we wish", was an exception made by the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) to the condition of their stay. It means that if Muslims wanted to expel you from that place, you would have to leave, as the Jews were not entitled to anything if Muslims had a different opinion. The agreement was concluded on such terms, and the Jews remained in Khaybar and stayed therein during the time of the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) and during the caliphate of Abu Bakr as-Siddīq (may Allah be pleased with him) until 'Umar ibn al-Khattāb (may Allah be pleased with him) became the caliph. During his time, Muslims were of the opinion of expelling the Jews from the Peninsula, and this acted as an invalidation of the contract between the Muslims and the Jews, and 'Umar (may Allah be pleased with him) expelled them from that place to Taymā' and Arīhā'.
Taymā’ is a place on the way of Madīnah and Tabūk city toward the Levant. Historically and geographically, it is located northwest of the Arabian Peninsula. It is almost 264 kilometres away to the east of Tabūk city and nearly 420 kilometres away to the north of Madīnah, whereas Arīhā’ was a village in the Levant.
The reason why ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him) expelled the Jews was narrated in Al-Bukhāri Collection where ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him) said: ‘Abdullah ibn ‘Umar went to his property there and was attacked at night, and his hands and feet were injured, and as we have no enemies there except them, they are our enemies and the ones whom we suspect, and I have made up my mind to exile them. So, he exiled them and gave them the price of the fruits they were entitled to in the form of money, camels, and goods, including saddles, ropes, etc. In the two Sahīh Collections, the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) said: "Expel the polytheists from Arabia."
The Hadīth shows that agricultural land is leased to the landowner for a known portion of its fruits, whereas the rest goes to its cultivator.
It points out that a Muslim ruler has the right to conclude treaties, make whatever exceptions he wants, and revoke such treaties based on the agreed-upon conditions, provided that all this is for the benefit of Muslims.
It highlights the fact that dealing with the People of the Book should be for what brings benefit, not harm, to the Muslim Ummah, along with being careful and taking precautions against them..