| Hadiths

Bukhari Hadiths 1356
Muslim Hadiths 558

Hadith

1946

Narrated Jaabir ibn ‘Abdullah (may Allah be pleased with him):Allah's Messengerﷺwas on a journey once and saw a crowd of people, and a man was being shaded (by them). He asked, "What is the matter?" They said, "He (the man) is fasting." The Prophet ﷺsaid, "It is not an act of righteousness to fast on a journey."
.

Commentary :
Legal concessionshave been prescribed for those who are not able to abide by the original rulings pertaining to worshipful acts, as a manifestation ofthe divine mercy and kindness conferred by Allah, Exalted is He, on His servants. The status of those who opt for legal concessions must not be undermined, nor should they bereproached for it. Rather, opting for legal concessions in their proper context is held in the same regard as abiding by the original rulings in their proper context,as per the laws of Islam (i.e., none is deemed superior to the other).
In this hadeeth, Jaabir ibn ‘Abdullah Al-Ansaaree(may Allah be pleased with them) narrated that the Messenger of Allahﷺ was once on a journey, and he saw a crowd of people around a man shading him from the sun. The man was drained of energy because of thirst and fatigue. He ﷺasked, "What is the matter? (What happened to him?)" They explained that he was exhausted because he was fasting while traveling and did not avail himself of the legal concession in this regard. Thereupon, the Prophet ﷺinformed them that his actdid not conform with the due obedience andrighteousness to face such hardship, considering that Allah, Exalted is He,had granted legal concession for a traveler to refrain from fasting, whether it was obligatory of voluntary fasting. The legal concession in this regard was revealed in the Quran; Allah, Exalted is He, Says (what means): {…and whoever is ill or on a journey - then an equal number of other days. Allah intends for you ease and does not intend for you hardship.} [Quran 2:185]. The need to avail oneself of the legal concession and refrain from fasting is further emphasized if the traveler is performing Hajj or participating in Jihaad, because both require physical strength.
The permissibility of fasting while travelling as long as one finds the physical strength to endure ithas been deduced from the following hadeeth. Narrated Aboo Al-Dardaa’ (may Allah be pleased with him): “We set out with Allah's Messengerﷺon one of his journeys on a very hot day, and it was so hot that one had to put his hand over his head to protect himself from the burning sun. None of us was fasting except the Prophet ﷺ and Ibn Rawaahah (may Allah be pleased with him).” [Al-Bukhaaree and Muslim].
This hadeeth highlights that the Laws of Islam is founded on ease and facilitation. It also urges Muslims to take it easy on themselves with regard to worship and avail of the legal concessions granted to them by Allah, The Exalted.
.

1947

Narrated Anas ibn Maalik (may Allah be pleased with him):We used to travel with the Prophet ﷺand neither did the fasting persons criticize those who were not fasting, nor did those who were not fasting criticize the fasting ones.
.

Commentary :
Concessionsinworship have been prescribedfor those who are not able to abide by the original rulings,as a manifestation ofthe divine mercy and kindness conferred by Allah, Exalted is He, on His servants.
The status of those who opt for these legal concessions must not be undermined, nor should they be reproached for it. Rather, opting for legal concessions in their proper context is held in the same regardas abiding by the original rulings in their proper context as per the laws of Islam (i.e., none is held superior to the other).
In this hadeeth, Anas ibn Maalik (may Allah be pleased with him) related that they used to travel with the Prophet ﷺ and neither did the fasting persons criticize those who were not fasting, availing themselves of the legal concession, nor did those who were not fasting criticize the fasting ones, who chose to abide by the original ruling. Both options are prescribed for the traveler, to best suit the different conditions of people during travel. Whoever is able to fast should do so, and whoever is unable to fast should avail himself of the legal concession,and there is no harm in that.
The legal concession in this regard was revealed in the Quran; Allah, Exalted is He, Says (what means): {…and whoever is ill or on a journey - then an equal number of other days. Allah intends for you ease and does not intend for you hardship.} [Quran 2:185]. The need to avail oneself of the legal concession and refrain from fasting is further emphasized if the traveler is performing Hajj or participating in Jihaad, because both require physical strength.
This hadeeth instructs Muslims not to give in to anger or object to what is permissible and prescribed.
It is also deduced therefrom that the Companions (may Allah be pleased with them) were considerate with one another and knowledgeable of both legal concessions and original rulings.
It is also inferred thathavingknowledge of Laws of Islam provisions prevents disagreement among Muslims..

1949

Narrated Naafi‘ narrated that Ibn ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him)recited the ayah: "They had a choice either to fast or to feed a poor person for every day and said that the ayah was abrogated.
.

Commentary :
Fasting is one of the pillars of Islam, and the Quranand the Sunnah have clarified all its general provisions. The obligation of fasting in Islam has gone through gradual legislative stages, and the Companions (may Allah be pleased with them) reported to us the key features of these stages.
In this report, Naafi’,the freed slave of ‘AbdullahIbn ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him),from the Taabi‘oon, informed us that ‘Abdullah(may Allah be pleased with him)recited the words of Allah, Exalted is He, (which mean): {And upon those who are able [to fast, but with hardship] - a ransom [as substitute] of feeding a poor person [each day].} [Quran 2:184].However, he (may Allah be pleased with him) recited it as “feeding poor persons [each day],” in the plural rather than, “feeding a poor person [each day],”which is one of the approved ten modes of recitation confirmed by Tawaatur (i.e., by collectively contiguous narrations transmitted by a large group of trustworthy narrators, generation after generation, and it is absolutely impossible for them to agree on a lie). It means thatwhoever is unable to fastmust feed one poor person for each missed fast day. At the early legislative stages, it was prescribed for a Muslim to pay this ransom and refrain from fasting in Ramadan, even if he was physically able to fast. Then, Ibn ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him) clarified that the ayahabout the ransom was abrogated and the relevant ruling was abrogated as well, yet it remained in the Quran (its wording was not abrogated). The ruling was abrogated by the ayah that reads (what means): {So whoever sights [the new moon of] the month, let him fast it.} [Quran 2:185].Thus, whoever was able to fast became obliged to observe fasting during Ramadan.
On the other hand, Ibn ‘Abbaas (may Allah be pleased with them) held a different opinion in this regard. It has been narrated on the authority of ‘Ataa’ ibn Aboo Rabaah, from the Taabi‘oon, that he heard ‘Abdullah ibn ‘Abbaas (may Allah be pleased with them) reciting the ayahthat reads (what means): {And upon those who are able [to fast, but with hardship] - a ransom [as substitute] of feeding a poor person [each day].} [Quran 2:184]. Ibn ‘Abbaas said: “This ayah was not abrogated. It rather refers to the old people who cannot endure fasting; it is allowable for them to pay the prescribed ransom instead, feeding one poor person for each fast day.”
He (may Allah be pleased with him) held that the ruling pertaining to the ransom was not abrogated, but rather that it was applicable to old people who were unable to fast.
The hadeeth affirms the abrogation of some ayaat of the Quran.
.

1950

‘Aa’ishah(may Allah be pleased with her)said:
Sometimes I missed some fast days of Ramadan, but could not fast in lieu of them (i.e., make up for them) except in the month of Sha‘baan." Yahya, a sub-narrator said: "She (may Allah be pleased with her)used to be busy serving the Prophet ﷺ.”
.

Commentary :
Fasting is one of the pillars of Islam. The Quran and the Sunnah haveclarified all its general provisions. For instance, the Sunnah clarified that if a woman gets her period in Ramadan, it is incumbent on her to refrain from fastinguntil her periodends and she attains ritual purity.Furthermore, she is required to make up for the missed fast days later on. ‘Aa’ishah (may Allah be pleased with her)stated that she would sometimes miss out fast days of Ramadan due to menstruation or for other valid excusesand could not make up for them except in the month of Sha’baan of the following year.
Yahya ibnSa’eed Al-Ansaaree, one of the narrators of hadeeth,clarified that what was preventing her from making up for the missed fast days earlier was that she (may Allah be pleased with her) was busy with the service of the Prophet ﷺ,meaning that she (may Allah be pleased with her)keenly ensured that she could always fulfill the Prophet’s right to sexual enjoyment with her. This was the attitude of all the Prophet’s wives, being keen on keeping him happy and satisfied. They would even abstain from seeking his permission to observe fastingfor fear that he ﷺmight have wanted to engage in sexual intercourse with one of them on that day, but would give her the permission to fast, giving precedence to her wish over his desire and need.As for the month of Sha‘baan, he ﷺ used to observe fasting almost all month long,and therefore they would conveniently have the chance to make up for the missed fast days or feel free to ask for his permission to observe fasting,since there would be no other available time to make up for those fast days. This falls under the category of availing oneself of a legal concession orthe less strict scholarly view, because a woman is given the choice to make up for the missed fast days at any time during the year till the following Ramadan.
It is also deduced from the hadeeth that honoring and fulfilling the husband’s rights over his wife is given precedenceover other rights, time-bound religious obligations aside.
It also highlights the ease and facilitation fostered by Islamin making up for the missed fast days of Ramadanfor- an excuse which is acceptable in the Laws of Islam.
It is also inferred from the hadeeth that it is allowable for a Muslim to delay making up for the missed fast days of Ramadan for a valid excuse or for no excuse at all.
.

1952

‘Narrated Aa’ishah (may Allah be pleased with her):Allah's Messengerﷺsaid, "Whoever died and he ought to have fasted (the missed fast days of Ramadan) then his guardians must fast (i.e., make up for them) on his behalf."
.

Commentary :
Fasting is one of the pillars of Islam. The Quran and the Sunnah haveclarified all its general provisions, and the noble Companions(may Allah be pleased with them)have reported thatfor us.
In this hadeeth, the Prophet ﷺmade it clear that if a person dies before making up for the missed obligatory fasting, whether due to avow, expiation, or missed fast days of Ramadan,even though he was able to fast,, his guardian, i.e., any of his relatives, whether he\she was among his heirs or not, should make up for the missed obligatory fast days on his behalf, and it wouldbe sufficient in terms of clearing the dead person’s liability from the obligation in this regard.
However, if someone dies before making up for the missed obligatory fasting for a valid excuse, e.g., a disease that befell him until his death, he shall bear no sin for that and his guardians are not required to make up for the missed fast days, given the general indication of the ayah reading (that which means): {…and whoever is ill or on a journey - then an equal number of other days. Allah intends for you ease and does not intend for you hardship and [wants] for you to complete the period and to glorify Allah for that [to] which He has guided you; and perhaps you will be grateful.} [Quran 2:185].
In this ayah, Allah, Exalted is He, enjoins upon the person to make up for the missed fast days on other days. If a sick person dies before recovery, he is cleared from the obligation of making up for the missed fast days and the ransom (feeding a poor person for each missed fast day), because feeding these poor people is an alternative to fasting. If fasting is no longer deemed obligatory, the same goes for feeding as well.
However, if someone does not make up for the missed fast days out of neglect, without having a valid excuse, and dies, it is not incumbent on his guardians to make up for the missed fast days, and it is not valid if they did, because the prescribed time window for making up for the missed fasting has expired.
This hadeeth alsoteaches us keenness in fulfilling the rights of Allah, Exalted is He, over us, and urges us to maintain ties of kinship.
.

1953

Narrated Ibn ‘Abbaas (may Allah be pleased with him): A man cameto the Prophet ﷺand said, "O Allah's Messenger!My mother died and she ought to have fasted one month (for her missed Ramadan). Shall I fast on her behalf?" The Prophet ﷺreplied in the affirmative and said, "The debt owed to Allah is more deserving (of being paid off)."
In another narration a woman is reported to have said, "My sister died..." Narrated Ibn `Abbas: A woman said to the Prophet ﷺ: “My mother died and she had vowed to fast but she did not fast.” In another narration Ibn ‘Abbaas is reported to have said, "A woman said to the Prophet ﷺ, "My mother died while she ought to have fasted for fifteen days."
.

Commentary :
Fasting is one of the pillars of Islam.The Quran and the Sunnah haveclarified all its general provisions, and the noble Companions (may Allah be pleased with them)have reported that for us.
In this hadeeth, ‘AbdullahNarrated Ibn ‘Abbaas (may Allah be pleased with him) that a man came to the Prophet ﷺand told him that his mother had died before making up for a missed month of fasting, whether it was the obligatory fasting of Ramadan, or an obligatory fasting due to a vow or expiation.He asked if it would be sufficient for him to make up for the missed fasting on her behalf? (Will it clear her liability from this obligation?) The Prophet ﷺ repliedin the affirmative and instructed him tomake up for the missed fasting on her behalf, upon which her liability would be cleared.Afterwards, he ﷺ drew an analogy between the repayment of the dead person’s debts andhow this clears his liability, andthe repayment of the debts owed to Allah, Exalted is He, i.e., the missed fasting. He ﷺ added: “The debt owed to Allah, Exalted is He, is more deserving of being repaid,” and it is more deserving of being repaid and more likelyto be accepted.
Some versions of the hadeeth, like the one cited in Saheeh Muslim, state that a woman came to the Prophet ﷺ asking him the same regarding her mother. It is possible that these were two different incidents.
If a person dies before making up for missed obligatory fasting, and he was able to make up for it, but did not until death befell him, his guardian, i.e., any of his relatives (whether he\she was among his heirs or not), may make up for the missed obligatory fast days on his behalf.This would be sufficient in terms of clearing the dead person’s liability from the obligation.Otherwise, he may feed a poor person for each missed fast day instead.
However, if someone dies before making up for the missed obligatory fasting for a valid excuse, e.g., a disease that befell him until his death, he shall bear no sin for that, and his guardians are not required to make up for the missed fast days, given the general indication of the ayah’s wording, which reads (what means): {…and whoever is ill or on a journey - then an equal number of other days.} [Quran 2:185]. In this ayah, Allah, Exalted is He,stated thatit is obligatory on such a person to make up for the missed fast days on other days. If a sick person dies before attaining recovery, his liability is cleared from the obligation of making up for the missed fast days and the ransom (feeding a poor person for each missed fast day), because feeding poor people here is an alternative to fasting. If fasting is no longer deemed obligatory, the same goes for feeding the poor as well.
The hadeeth encourages us to show keenness in fulfilling the rights of Allah, Exalted is He, over us, and in showing the enjoined dutifulness towards parents after their death.
The permissibility of acting upon Qiyaas (i.e., legal analogy) is also inferred from the hadeeth.
.

1955

Narrated ‘Abdullah ibn Aboo Awfaa(may Allah be pleased with him):We were once in the company of the Prophet ﷺ on a journey and he ﷺwas fasting. When the sun set, he ﷺaddressed somebody: "O so-and-so, get up and mix some Saweeq with water (i.e., prepare barley beverage\ liquid meal) for us." He replied, "O Allah's Messenger! Will you wait till it is evening?" The Prophet ﷺsaid, "Get down and mix Saweeq with water for us." He replied, "O Allah's Messenger ﷺ! If you wait till the evening!" The Prophet ﷺ said again, "Get down and mix Saweeq with water for us." He replied, “It is still daytime!” The Prophet ﷺsaid again, "Get down and mix Saweeq with water for us." He finally got down and mixed Saweeq for them. The Prophet ﷺ drank it and then said, "When you see night falling from this side, i.e., indicating sunset, a fasting person should (hasten to) break his fast.".

Commentary :
It is known that all good lies in following the guidance of the Prophet ﷺ and sheer evil lies in introducing religious innovations.Being one of the loftiest worshipful acts and best means to draw closer to Allah, Exalted is He, it is incumbent upon a Muslim to follow the guidance of the Prophet ﷺ regarding fasting, and he ﷺ urged the fasting people to hasten in breaking their fasts.
In this hadeeth, ‘Abdullah ibn Aboo Awfaa(may Allah be pleased with him) narrated that they went once on a journey with the Prophet ﷺwhen he was fasting. After sunset, heﷺ commanded a man to mix some Saweeq with water(i.e., prepare a liquid meal bymixing roasted barley flour with milk or water), for them to break their fast.The man thought that it was early to break the fast then, and therefore said to the Prophet ﷺ: “O Messenger of Allah! If you wait till the evening,”meaning to wait longer to ensure that the time of sunset had come. However, the Prophet ﷺ repeated his command twice and the man gave him the same answer! On the third time, the man said to the Prophet ﷺ: “It is still daytime!” He thought that the sun had not yet set because he could still see daylightand assumed that the fast day had not ended yet.It is possible that he saw strongdaylight due to the clear sky, so he thought that the sun had not set, or perhaps he assumed that the sunlight was merely blocked by a mountain or clouds or the like. Had he understood that sunset had already taken place,he would not have been reluctant to comply with the Prophet’s ﷺcommand, which would have constituted disobedience. Rather, he merely wanted to investigate the matter further to be on the safe side and ensure that he had abided by the relevant Laws of Islamruling. On the fourth time, the man did as he was ordered by the Prophet ﷺ, whodrank the barley meal and then instructed people that whenever the sun sets and they can see night falling from the east, marking the end of the day and the beginning of the night, a fasting person should break his fast.
A fasting person is urged to hasten to break his fast directly after sunset so as not to increasedaytime at the expense of nighttime, and because it is more convenient and kinder for the fasting person, andimplies availing oneself of the relevant legal concession and expressing more gratitude to Allah for His blessings.
It is deduced from the hadeeth that it is allowable toreminda scholar of what he might have forgotten, and the practice of refrainingfrom doing so after the third time.
It is also inferred that it is permissible to observe fasting while travelling, and that it is betterand more virtuous than refrainment from fasting, as long as it does not cause apparent hardship for the fasting person.
In addition, it is deduced from the hadeeth that a religious command has more (authoritative) weight than sensory judgment (and conclusions), and that the Laws of Islam must be given precedence over intellectual judgment..

1957

Sahl ibn Sa‘d(may Allah be pleased with him) narrated that Allah's Messenger ﷺ said, "People will remain on the right path as long as they hasten to break their fast.".

1959

Aboo Usaamah narrated on the authority of Hishaam ibn ‘Urwah narrating on the authority of Faatimah (may Allah be pleased with her) that Asmaa’ bint Aboo Bakr (may Allah be pleased with them) said, "We broke our fast during the lifetime of the Prophet ﷺ on a cloudy day and then the sun appeared." Hishaam was asked, "Were they ordered to fast in lieu of that day?" He replied, "It had to be made up for (i.e., making up for it is inevitable)." Ma‘mar said, "I heard Hishaam saying, "I do not know whether they fasted in lieu of that day or not.".

1960

Al-Rubay‘ bint Mu‘awwidh (may Allah be pleased with her) narrated:
"The Prophet ﷺ sent a messenger to the village of the Ansaar in the morning of the Day of ‘Aashooraa’ (10th of Muharram) to announce: 'Whoever has eaten something should not eat but complete the fast, and whoever is observing fast should complete it.' She (may Allah be pleased with her) further said, "Since then we used to fast on that day regularly and also make our boys fast. We used to make toys of wool for the boys and if anyone of them cried for food, he was given those toys till it was time to break the fast.".

Commentary :
The Day of ‘Aashooraa’ is a blessed day, on which Allah, Exalted is He, saved His Prophet Moosaa from Pharaoh and his army. The Messenger of Allah ﷺ fasted it, and commanded Muslims to fast as well, to express their gratitude to Allah, Exalted is He.
In this hadeeth, Al-Rubay‘ bint Mu‘awwidh (may Allah be pleased with her)related that the Prophet ﷺ once sent his messengers on the morning of the Day of ‘Aashooraa’, the tenth of Muharram, to the villages of Al-Madeenah. They called out to the people, “Whoever has eaten something should not eat, but complete the fast, and whoever is observing fast should complete it.”
Then, she (may Allah be pleased with her) stated that since then they used to fast on the Day of ‘Aashooraa’ regularly and also made their young boys fast. They used to make them toys of dyed wool and if anyone of them cried for food, he was given those toys to be distracted by them till it was time to break the fast, to encourage and train young children in performing worshipful acts.
It has been reported in Saheeh Al-Bukhaaree and Saheeh Muslim that the Prophet ﷺ deemed fasting on the Day of ‘Aashooraa’ optional after the obligatory fasting ofRamadan was prescribed. It was narrated on the authority of Ibn ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him) that he ﷺ said: “That was a day on which the people of pre-Islamic days used to observe fast. So, heamongst you who likes to observe fast should do so, and he who does not like it should abandon it.” [Al-Bukhaaree and Muslim].
He ﷺ commanded them to fast on it as a voluntary act of worship.
The merits of this blessed day have been reported in many texts of the Sunnah. For instance, it has been narrated that fasting it expiates the sins committed in the previous year, as narrated on the authority of Aboo Qataadah (may Allah be pleased with him) and recorded in Saheeh Muslim.
The permissibility of training young children in fasting can be inferred from the hadeeth.
It is also deduced therefrom that when any of the Companions (may Allah be pleased with them) says, “We used to do such-and-such during the lifetime of the Prophet ﷺ,” such a report is considered Marfoo‘ (i.e., a Hadeeth that is directly attributed to the Prophet ﷺ), because the fact that he ﷺ did not disapprove their act serves as a tacit approval of it on his part, otherwise he ﷺ would have forbidden them from such an act.
.

1968

Aboo Juhayfah (may Allah be pleased with him) narrated:
The Prophet ﷺ established a bond of brotherhood between Salmaan and Aboo Al-Dardaa’ (may Allah be pleased with them). Salmaan once paid a visit to his brother Aboo Al-Dardaa’ and found his wife, Umm Al-Dardaa’, dressed in shabby clothes. He inquired about her state, and she replied, “Your brother Aboo Al-Dardaa’ is not interested in (the luxuries of) this worldly life!” In the meantime, Aboo Al-Dardaa’ came and prepared a meal for Salmaan, who requested Aboo Al- Dardaa’ to eat (with him), but he said, "I am fasting." Thereupon, Salmaan said, “I am not going to eat unless you eat with me!” So, Aboo Al-Dardaa’ ate (with Salmaan). When it was night and (a part of the night passed), Aboo Al-Dardaa’ got up (to offer night prayer), but Salmaan told him to sleep and Aboo Al-Dardaa’ complied. After sometime, Aboo Al-Dardaa’ again got up but Salmaan told him to sleep longer. When it was the last hours of the night, Salmaan told him to get up then, and both of them offered night prayer. Salmaan told Aboo Al-Dardaa’ (may Allah be pleased with them), "Your Lord has a right on you, your self has a right on you, and your family has a right on you; give everyone who has a right over you his due right!" Aboo Al-Dardaa’ went to the Prophet ﷺ and reported to him the whole story. The Prophet ﷺ said, "Salmaan has spoken the truth.".

Commentary :
Allah, Exalted is He, did not enjoin Muslims to devote their lives exclusively to worship; monasticism is not prescribed in Islam, contrary to the Christians who invented monasticism and added it to their religion.
In this hadeeth, Aboo Juhayfah,Wahab ibn ‘Abdullah Al-Suwaa’i (may Allah be pleased with him)narrated that the Prophet ﷺ established a bond of brotherhood between Salmaan Al-Faarsi and Aboo Al-Dardaa’ ‘Umayr ibn Qays Al-Ansaaree(may Allah be pleased with them). It is noteworthy that this was a different kind of brotherhood bond than the one that was first established by the Prophet ﷺ between the emigrants and Al-Ansaar after the migration to Al-Madeenah, which entitled brothers to inherit from each other at first and was abrogated later on. Rather, it was more of a moral bond. One day, Salmaan Al-Faarisi visited his brother Aboo Al-Dardaa’ (may Allah be pleased with them) and found his wife Umm Al-Dardaa’, Khayrah bint Aboo Hadrid Al-Aslameeyyah (may Allah be pleased with her) wearing shabby clothes, of the type usually worn by women while carrying out the household chores, instead of wearing fancy clothes and beautifying herself for her husband. Salmaan inquired about her state and she replied, “Your brother Aboo Al-Dardaa’ is not interested in (the luxuries of) this worldly life!” Her statement was meant as a euphemism for his refrainment from approaching her; she felt bashful to say it explicitly. This visit took place before the obligation of Hijaab was prescribed for Muslim women. Afterward, Aboo Al-Dardaa’ came and prepared some food for Salmaan, who asked Aboo Al-Dardaa’ to join him and eat with him, but he informed him that he was fasting. However, Salmaan insisted that he should join him and said: “I am not going to eat unless you eat with me!” Therefore, Aboo Al-Dardaa’ ate with Salmaan, whose aim was to forbid Aboo Al-Dardaa’ from overburdening himself with worship to the extent of harming his wife! Aboo Al-Dardaa’ complied and ate with Salmaan (may Allah be pleased with them).
Salmaan spent the night with them. When a part of the night passed, Aboo Al-Dardaa’ got up to offer night prayers, but Salmaan commanded him to sleep and Aboo Al-Dardaa’ complied. After sometime, Aboo Al-Dardaa’ got up again but Salmaan commanded him to sleep longer. When it got to the last hours of the night, Salmaan told him to get up then, and both of them offered night prayer. Salmaan advised Aboo Al-Dardaa’ (may Allah be pleased with them) and clarified to him that Allah, Exalted is He, had a right over him, his body and health had rights over him, and his family and children had rights over him; such as showing kindness and intimacy to his wife, tending to the needs of his wife and children, and teaching them what benefits them in this worldly life and the Hereafter. He then commanded Aboo Al-Daraa’ to give everyone who had a right over him his due right.
Later on, Aboo Al-Dardaa’ went to the Prophet ﷺ and reported to him the whole story. The Prophet ﷺ said, "Salmaan has spoken the truth."
This hadeeth serves as evidence for the fact that a person should not overburden himself with fasting and night prayer (beyond his abilities), but should rather pray and perform night prayer moderately to attain the desired benefit (gain reward) and avoid fatigue, difficulty, and hardship.
It is also deduced from the hadeeth that it is permissible to establish bonds of brotherhood between Muslims, and that it is allowable to visit one’s friends and brothers in faith and spend the night in their houses.
The permissibility of talking to a non-Mahram (marriageable) woman for a valid need and offering advice to one’s fellow Muslim brothers can also be inferred from the hadeeth.
The hadeeth also highlights the virtues of performing night prayer in the last hours of the night.
Furthermore, it is also deduced therefrom that it recommended acts may be deemed forbidden for someone if it is feared that they may cause boredom and tedium, and lead him to neglect the enjoined fulfillment of the rights due over him.
The hadeeth underlines that it is disliked to overburden oneself with worship.
It is also deduced from the hadeeth that it is allowable to break a voluntary fast for a need and interest.
It is also inferred therefrom that it is permissible for a woman to beautify herself for her husband.
Finally, the hadeeth also highlights the merits of Salmaan Al-Faarisi (may Allah be pleased with him), since the Prophet ﷺ approved his act and stated that he spoke the truth.
.

1969

‘Aa’ishah (may Allah be pleased with her) said:
Allah's Messenger ﷺ used to fast till one would say that he would never stop fasting (on that month), and he would refrain from fasting till one would say that he would never fast (on that month). I never saw Allah's Messenger ﷺ fasting for a whole month except the month of Ramadan, and did not see him fast in any month more than he fasted in the month of Sha‘baan..

Commentary :
Perseverance in performing righteous deeds regularly leads a servant of Allah to attain divine mercy and deliverance from the Hellfire. The Prophet ﷺ was the optimal role model in this regard. He ﷺ persevered in performing acts of worship and acts of obedience regularly; one of such acts was voluntary fasting, which is not bound to a specific time.
In this hadeeth, ‘Aa’ishah (may Allah be pleased with her) informed us that the Prophet ﷺ sometimes observed fasting most of a month, so much that they thought that he ﷺ was going to fast the whole month, and sometimes refrained from fasting on a month so much that they thought that he ﷺ was not going to observe fasting on that month at all. He ﷺ did not fast an entire month except Ramadan, because it is obligatory, and it was mentioned in the hadeeth to emphasize this fact. The only month he ﷺ fasted in full was Ramadan, so that voluntary fasting in any other month would not be mistakenly believed to be obligatory. He ﷺ observed fasting most of Sha‘baan, but did not fast it in full lest people should mistakenly assume that it was obligatory, and to distinguish it from the obligatory fasting ofRamadan. He ﷺ often fastedin Sha‘baan in particular because deeds are presented to Allah, Exalted is He, in the month of Sha‘baan, and he ﷺ loved to have his deeds presented to Him while he ﷺ was fasting.
Furthermore, people often neglect that month, being in between two significant months, i.e., Rajab and Ramadan, as stated in a hadeeth cited by Al-Nasaa’i and Ahmad.
It is deduced from the hadeeth that the voluntary acts of worship are not bound to specific times, but may be performed at any time based on the willingness and ability of the doers.
The hadeeth also highlights the virtues of Sha’baan, and encourages Muslims to fast during it more often. It is also deduced from the hadeeth that it is allowable to observe voluntary fasting on only one or a few days each month. .

1973

Humayd narrated that he asked Anas (may Allah be pleased with him) about the fasting of the Prophet ﷺ. He (may Allah be pleased with him) said "Whenever I liked to see the Prophet ﷺ fasting in any given month, I could see that, and whenever I liked to see him not fasting, I could see that too, and if I liked to see him praying in any given night, I could see that, and if I liked to see him sleeping, I could see that, too." Anas (may Allah be pleased with him) further said, "I never touched silk or velvet softer than the hand of Allah's Messenger ﷺ and never smelled musk or perfumed smoke more pleasant than the smell of the Messenger ﷺ.".

Commentary :
Perseverance in performing righteous deeds regularly leads a servant of Allah to attain divine mercy and deliverance from the Hellfire. The Prophet ﷺ was the optimal role model in this regard. He ﷺ preserved in performing worshipful acts and acts of obedience regularly, and among such acts were voluntary fasting and night prayer.
Humayd, from the Taabi‘oon (Followers), informed us in this hadeeth that he asked Anas ibn Maalik (may Allah be pleased with him) about the fasting of the Prophet ﷺ, and he replied that whenever he wished to see the Prophet ﷺ observing fasting or refraining from it on any given day of the month, he could, and whenever he wished to see him performing night prayers or sleeping at any given time of the night, he could. This means that he ﷺ used to observe fasting often on some days of the month and refrain from fasting on others, and used to divide his night between sleep to get rest (i.e., fulfill the rights of his body over him) and worship (i.e., fulfill the rights of Allah, Exalted is He, over him).
Afterward, Anas (may Allah be pleased with him)described some of the distinct physical qualities of the Prophet ﷺ. He said that he never touched silk or velvet softer than the hand of Allah's Messenger ﷺ and never smelled musk or perfumed smoke (i.e., ‘Abeer, which is a blend of beautiful and sweet scents) more pleasant than his smell. He ﷺ was endowed with the most perfect moral and physical qualities, and Allah, Exalted is He, singled him out for these distinct qualities so that his perfected outward appearance would mirror and further refine his perfected inner character.
It is deduced from the hadeeth that the Prophet ﷺ adhered to moderation in worship; he ﷺ did not observe fasting all year long, nor did he pray all night long, so as not to overburden himself and his nation with worship, lest they should follow his example in this regard,which would be unfair to them (i.e., since they cannot stand what he ﷺ could).
The hadeeth also highlights some distinct physical qualities of the Prophet ﷺ and that he ﷺ was endowed with a pleasant outward appearance (and good looks).
The hadeeth encourages Muslims to perform night prayer and observe voluntary fasting.
.

1982

Anas (may Allah be pleased with him) said:
The Prophet ﷺ paid a visit to Umm Sulaym once and she placed before him dates and ghee. The Prophet ﷺsaid, "Put the ghee and dates in their respective containers for I am fasting." Then, he ﷺ stood somewhere in her house and offered voluntary prayer and then invoked Allah, Exalted is He, to bless Umm Sulaym and her family with all that is good. Then Umm Sulaym said, "O Allah's Messenger ﷺ! I have a special request (today)." He ﷺ said, "What is it?" She replied, "(Please invoke Allah for) your servant Anas." Thereupon, he ﷺ did not leave anything good in the worldly life or the Hereafter which he did not invoke (Allah to bestow) on me and said, “O Allah! Bless him (i.e., Anas) with abundant wealth and offspring!”
Anas (may Allah be pleased with him) added: “Therefore, I was one of the richest among the Ansaar and my daughter Umaynah told me that when Al-Hajjaaj came to Basrah, more than 120 of my offspring had been buried..

Commentary :
The Prophet ﷺ used to honor his Companions (may Allah be pleased with them) and visit them from time to time, to check on their conditions and supplicate Allah, Exalted is He, to bless them and their families and bestow upon them all that is good, as stated in this hadeeth.
Narrated Anas ibn Maalik (may Allah be pleased with him) that the Prophet ﷺ once visited his mother Umm Sulaym (may Allah be pleased with them) and that she served him some dates and ghee to show hospitality to him. However, he ﷺ apologized and informed her that he was observing voluntary fasting, and asked her to put the dates and ghee back in their containers. Afterwards, he ﷺstood somewhere in her house, offered a two-Rak‘ah voluntary prayer and then invoked Allah, Exalted is He, to bless her and her family with all that is good. The Companions (may Allah be pleased with them) often asked the Prophet ﷺ to pray in their homes and supplicate Allah, Exalted is He, for them. Then, Umm Sulaym (may Allah be pleased with her) informed the Prophet ﷺ that she had a special request. He ﷺ inquired about her request and she told him that she wanted him to supplicate Allah, Exalted is He, in favor of her son Anas, who was the Prophet’s ﷺservant. Thereupon, he ﷺ supplicated Allah, Exalted is He, to bless him with abundant wealth and offspring.
The version of the hadeeth cited in Saheeh Muslim reads: “He ﷺ he invoked blessings for me (that I should be blessed with) all that is good and this was what he ﷺ (said) at the end of what be supplicated for me: “O Allah, grant him wealth and progeny, and confer blessings (upon him) in (each one) of them.’” [Muslim].
The Prophet’s ﷺsupplication was answered as indicated by the words of Anas (may Allah be pleased with him) when he said: “I was one of the richest people from the Ansaar and my daughter Umaynah told me that when Al-Hajjaaj ibn Yusuf Al-Thaqfi came to Basrah, in 75 A.H., more than 120 of my descendants (i.e., the children of my sons and daughters) had been buried.” Anas (may Allah be pleased with him) was about eighty years old at that time, and he died in 93 A.H. when he was nearly a hundred years old!
It is inferred from the hadeeth that being blessed with abundant wealth and offspring could be an aspect of the goodness, blessing, and prosperity conferred upon a servant of Allah, Exalted is He. He ﷺ would not have supplicated Allah for Anas (may Allah be pleased with him) except with what was good for him with regards to his religiosity and worldly affairs.
It is also deduced from the hadeeth that it is allowable to supplicate Allah, Exalted is He, for abundant wealth and offspring.
The hadeeth also highlights the Prophet’s ﷺhumbleness and kindness towards his Companions (may Allah be pleased with them), and it is deduced therefrom that a ruler may visit the ruled to check on their conditions.
The hadeeth also emphasizes the merits of Anas (may Allah be pleased with him).
Among other lessons inferred from the hadeeth are the following: putting one’s child before oneself (i.e., Umm Sulaym asked the Prophet ﷺ to supplicate Allah for Anas rather than herself), and kindness in presenting requests. It is also deduced that the death of a great number of his descendants does not contradict the fact that the Prophet’s ﷺsupplications to bless him with abundant offspring was answered.
The hadeeth also emphasizes the permissibility of showing hospitality to guests and honoring them.
It is also inferred therefrom that it is allowable to turn down a gift as long as it would not cause hardship for the gift-giver, and that he should explain the reason to him.
The hadeeth urges Muslims to preserve food and refrain from wasting.
It also shows that if a guest will not eat from the food served to him by the host, he should considerately supplicate Allah, Exalted is He, in his favor to make him feel better.
Finally, it also encourages Muslims to supplicate Allah, Exalted is He, for all that is good in the worldly life and the Hereafter, because all good lies in the Hands of Allah, Exalted is He, and to proclaim and celebrateHis blessings bestowed upon us..

1983

Mutarrif narrated on the authority of ‘Imraan ibn Husayn (may Allah be pleased with him):
That the Prophet ﷺ asked him (‘Imraan) or asked a man and ‘Imraan was listening, "O Aboo so-and-so! Have you fasted the last days of this month?" (The narrator thought that he ﷺ said, "the month of Ramadan"). The man replied, "No, O Allah's Messenger ﷺ!" The Prophet ﷺ said to him, "When you finish your fasting (of Ramadan) fast two days (in Shawwaal)." Through another chain of narration, ‘Imraan said, "The Prophet ﷺ said, ‘(Have you fasted) the last days of Sha‘baan?’".

Commentary :
The Prophet ﷺ used to fast more often in the month of Sha’baan, and he ﷺ urged his Companions (may Allah be pleased with them) to fast during it.
In this hadeeth the Companion ‘Imraan ibn Husayn (may Allah be pleased with him) related that the Prophet ﷺ asked him once - or he asked another man while ‘Imraan was listening. Mutarrif ibn ‘Abdullah ibn Al-Shikhkheer, one of the narrators of the hadeeth, it was unsure. He ﷺ said: "O Aboo so-and-so! Have you fasted the last days of this month?" The Arabic word used in the hadeeth is ‘Sarar’ meaning the last days of the month, and the word linguistically denotes the concealment of the moon during these days, i.e., the twenty-eighth, twenty-ninth, and thirtieth nights (if the month is thirty days). It has also been said that the word refers to the three ‘white’ days in the middle of the month, namely, the thirteenth, fourteenth, and fifteenth of the lunar month.
He ﷺ commanded him to make up for those fast days after ‘Eid Al-Fitr and the end of the Ramadan fast, to observe the acts of worship he habitually performed, because the most endeared deed to Allah, Exalted is He, is the one performed regularly.
Aboo Al-Nu’maan Muhammad ibn Al-Fadhl Al-Sadoosi (the narrator of the hadeeth) said: “I think he said: ‘He ﷺ meant Ramadan.’” However, the mention of Ramadan here is a mistake in the narration because it is incumbent on Muslims to fast duringRamadan. It could also be in reference to the time when he ﷺ made that statement and not the fasting that the addressee did not observe, conforming to the version of the hadeeth cited in Saheeh Muslim reading: “Fast for two days instead of (one fast) when you have completed (the fast of) Ramadan.” The question was about fasting on the last days of Sha‘baan. If the intended meaning of the hadeeth’s wording is the last days of the month, this means that this hadeeth seemingly contradicts the authentic hadeeth reported about the prohibition of fasting one or two days before Ramadan. This can be explained by the assumption that this man habitually fasted the last days of the lunar month, and abstained from fasting them merely for fear of the reported prohibition of fasting one or two days before Ramadan. Therefore, the Prophet ﷺ made it clear to him that the prohibition in this regard does not apply to habitual or vowed fasting on these days, but rather that what is prohibited is singling them out for fasting.
It is deduced from this hadeeth that it is permissible to make up for missed voluntary fasting.
The hadeeth also shows that the Prophet ﷺ used to advise his Companions (may Allah be pleased with them) and urge them to perform acts of obedience..

1510

Abu Hurayrah (may Allah be pleased with him) reported that the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) said: "No son can repay a father unless he finds him a slave and buys him and emancipates him." Another version reads: "No son can repay his father.".

Commentary : The right that children owe to their parents is great, and being dutiful to them in Islam is among the greatest means of drawing closer to Allah, as Allah has made dutifulness to them one of the broadest ways of reaching Paradise. Allah has also made not obeying them among the major sins and misdeeds that lead their perpetrators to disgracing punishment.
In this Hadīth, the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) clarifies that the child, whether male or female, cannot repay his father - the mother is included and so are the grandparents who are the same as the parents - and fulfill his right in full for his kindness towards him except when he finds his father a slave, buys him with his own money, and emancipates him and sets him free. In other words, the son seeks to reach him by buying him, and it is well known that he only buys him to free him from slavery, not to have him as his own slave or to be the master of his father. So, nothing fulfills the father's right over his son, no matter what the son does, except this act. This is because Islam came when slavery and serfdom were widespread and a common habit of the Arabs, and there were bondmaids and slaves in every house.
It was said: If a man took possession of his father, the latter would be free by mere possession and [there is] no need to say: I set him free. Similarly, if he took possession of his mother, she would be free by mere possession and [there is] no need to say: I set her free.
The Hadīth encourages children to be dutiful and kind to their parents.
It also denotes the merit of emancipating slaves..

1513

Abu Hurayrah reported: The Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) forbade the Hasāh sale (throwing pebble sale) and the Gharar sale (uncertainty sale)..

Commentary : During the pre-Islamic era of ignorance, there prevailed types of transactions that involved massive oppression and injustice. When Islam came, it established fair sales and forbade whatever involved oppression. Hence, it forbade what involved fraud and ambiguity to stop disagreement and dispute among people, which is one of the Shariah-approved objectives.
In this Hadīth, Abu Hurayrah (may Allah be pleased with him) narrates that the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) forbade the Hasāh sale, which was one of the sales practiced by the people of Jāhiliyyah. If the seller or the buyer threw a pebble, that would be a sign of finalizing the sale. It had three forms: First: The seller says to the buyer: I would sell you of these garments that on which the pebble I throw falls; or: I would sell you a piece of this land from here to the part that this pebble reaches. Second: Considering the act of throwing the pebble itself a sale by saying: If you throw the pebble at this garment, it will be sold to you at such-and-such. Third: Saying: You have the option to either accept or reject the sale until I throw this pebble. It was said: It means saying: Throw the pebble and whatever number comes out, I will be entitled to an equal number of dinars or dirhams. All these are forms of invalid sales that entail doing injustice to one of the two parties of the sale.
The Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) also forbade the Gharar sale. Gharar means danger, delusion, and deceit. This is a generalization after a specification, as it includes any sale that involves any kind of deceit, or that which is ambiguous or cannot be fulfilled. One of the rationales behind forbidding this sale is the fact that it is a waste of money, for one may not be able to get the sold item, which means that he spent his money in vain.
The Hadīth prohibits deception and fraud in sales.
It warns against consuming people's properties wrongfully.
It also points out that the object of a sale transaction must be something known and must have a known price..

1519

Abu Hurayrah (may Allah be pleased with him) reported that the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) said: Do not go out to meet what is being brought for trade. Whoever goes out to meet it and buys something thereof, when its master comes to the market, he will have the option..

Commentary : Selling and buying have rulings and etiquettes in Islam that a Muslim must adhere to fulfill justice in transactions and enjoy the pleasures of this worldly life and the Hereafter.
In this Hadīth, the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) forbids merchants from going out and receiving those people who transport commodities from one country to another. They must not receive them before arriving and being acquainted with the prices of commodities in such a country because this might harm the seller as they might buy from him at a lower price than its known price, which would result in harming the owner of the commodity by underestimating its price. Hence, the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) commanded the one who goes out to meet it and buys something thereof, and does not comply with the prohibition. So when "its master," i.e., the owner of the commodity, comes to the market, he will have the option either to effect the sale or take back his goods, for perhaps he did him injustice and wronged him regarding its price compared to its price in this country.
The Hadīth encourages truthfulness and transparency and the avoidance of deceit in commercial transactions.
It shows the Prophet's keenness on whatever brings goodness to his Ummah and his kindness towards them even when it comes to worldly interests..

1525

Ibn ‘Abbās reported that the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) said: Whoever buys food should not sell it until he measures it. I said to Ibn ‘Abbās: Why? He said: Do you not see them transacting with gold, whereas the food is deferred?.

Commentary : Allah Almighty has prescribed in sale what maintains people's rights, keeps them away from conflicts and quarrels, and repels harm from them.
In this Hadīth, the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) advises us saying that whoever buys food and wants to resell it, he "should not sell it" until he takes it after being measured and weighed. This is an indirect reference that the buyer should receive it and it becomes in his possession and knows its amount in a way that negates ambiguity. This is related to what is sold by measure as in this case, so it must be first measured until he receives it in full, then, he may sell it afterward. It is not lawful for him to sell it before measuring it, as it could be subject to excess or deficiency, which entails doing injustice and harm either to the seller or the buyer. Thereupon, Tāwūs ibn Kaysān - from the Tābi‘is - asked Ibn ‘Abbās (may Allah be pleased with him and his father): "Why?" i.e., why did the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) stipulate this condition? Ibn ‘Abbās (may Allah be pleased with him and his father) said: "Do you not see them transacting with gold, whereas the food is deferred?" In other words, the seller used to take the price in gold dinars, and then he would delay the delivery of food to the buyer. Therefore, the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) stipulated that the buyer should not resell it until he receives it and it becomes in his possession. Another Hadīth in the two Sahīh Collections clarified that what he meant by that is to transfer the food to another place or to the markets where it is sold in order not to be monopolized or manipulate its price. So, he made it clear that the right thing is to transfer it to the markets, which are known to people, where food is sold and to take possession of it, since Qabd (taking possession) is a condition, and transferring it as mentioned fulfills this condition.
Moreover, in the two Sahīh Collections, the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) forbade reselling the food after buying it until he receives it in full, i.e., he should not adopt any procedure or dispose of it by selling it again unless he first takes what he has purchased and it becomes in his full possession. Only then, he can resell it. This guarantees preventing any harm to the seller, the buyer, or the dwellers of this country that could result in disputes and conflicts between people and, thus, inflict harm upon them.
The Hadīth shows the Prophet's keenness on whatever brings goodness to his Ummah and his kindness towards them even when it comes to worldly interests.
It highlights the prohibition of adopting sale methods that lead to the monopoly of goods and the rise in prices, or that cause harm to the parties involved in the sale transaction..

1530

Jābir ibn ‘Abdullāh reported: The Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) forbade selling a heap of dried dates, whose measure is unknown, for a specified amount of dried dates..

Commentary : The rulings of sale transactions in Islam revolve around honesty and the absence of uncertainty among the parties involved in the sale. The sold item must be known to both parties, in terms of type, quantity, and quality, in such a way that removes any ambiguity. The Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) forbade certain kinds of sales that involve Jahālah (ambiguity), Gharar (uncertainty), and Riba (usury).
This Hadīth clarifies some of these forbidden kinds of sales. Jābir ibn ‘Abdullah (may Allah be pleased with him and his father) narrates that the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him): "Forbade selling a heap of dried dates, whose measure is unknown," "Subrah" (heap): food that is collected in a pile and whose weight and quantity are unknown. This applies to all types of food; however, he mentioned here one type in particular, namely the dried dates, because it is their staple food; otherwise, the mentioned prohibition includes all types of measured food. In Muslim's version, he did not mention his saying: "of dried dates" at the end of the Hadīth, which indicates the inclusion of all types of food sold without knowing its amount in exchange for a known amount of its like. "For a specified amount of dried dates," i.e., he forbade selling an unknown amount for a known amount of the same type, like dried dates for dried dates, wheat for wheat, and barley for barley, as this involves ambiguity regarding the unmeasured food from one aspect besides involving Riba al-Fadl (usury of surplus) from another aspect, bearing in mind that ignorance about the equality between the sold and purchased items is like knowing that there is a surplus between them, which is clear Riba. If the items subject to Riba rulings are the same, then, they must be the same in measure and hand to hand. However, if they are of different types, then, there is nothing wrong with the surplus between them like in the case of selling dried dates for wheat, or barley for corn, and the same applies to selling for cash, gold, or silver.
The Hadīth clarifies how the Shariah regulates the process of selling and buying to avoid the occurrence of disputes..

1536

Jābir reported: The Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) forbade leasing land and selling it ahead for years, and selling fruits before ripening..

Commentary : In the pre-Islamic era of ignorance, there prevailed types of sale that brimmed with oppression and injustice. When Islam came, it established fair sales and forbade everything involving oppression. Hence, it forbade cheating in sale transactions. Putting an end to disputes and conflicts between the seller and the buyer is one of the objectives of the Shariah.
In this Hadīth, Jābir ibn ‘Abdullah (may Allah be pleased with him and his father) reports that the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) forbade "leasing land", which is renting it. The forbidden lease is that which is in return for some of its produce, which means that the rent agreed upon between the owner and the lessee is an amount specified from the beginning of the fruits produced by this land, which may or may not produce this amount. In this case, the one who cultivates it will not be capable of fulfilling his contract. However, there is nothing wrong with leasing land in return for gold, silver, or cash, as in the two Sahīh Collections, Hanzhalah ibn Qays reported: "That he asked Rāfi‘ ibn Khadīj about leasing land, and he said: The Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) forbade leasing land. He said: I said: Even in return for gold and silver? He said: If it is in return for gold and silver, there is no harm in it." Also in the two Sahīh Collections, Ibn ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him and his father) reported: "The Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) agreed with the people of Khaybar to work and cultivate in return for half of the fruits or crops produced." Therefore, the owner is allowed to lease it in return for a standard percentage of what is cultivated therein, like one-fourth or one-third of its produce.
He also forbade "selling it in advance for years." A version of Muslim reads: "Selling fruits in advance for years," which is selling the fruits of trees and palm trees for two years or more, knowing that such fruits have not been created yet. This is a Gharar sale (uncertain sale) because it involves selling something non-existent, ambiguous, undeliverable, and not owned by the contractor. So, it is a sale that involves a great deal of uncertainty and ambiguity.
The Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) also forbade "selling fruits before ripening," i.e., appearing to be ripe when it becomes colorful and its fruit appears and it becomes red or yellow, which is a sign of its good condition and safety from blight, and it becomes suitable for eating and selling.
The Hadīth shows the prohibition of every sale that involves ambiguity..

1536

Jābir ibn ‘Abdullāh reported: The Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) forbade taking of rent or share of land..

Commentary : In the pre-Islamic era of ignorance, there prevailed types of sales that brimmed with oppression and injustice. When Islam came, it established fair sales and forbade whatever involved oppression. Hence, it forbade whatever involved fraud, uncertainty, and ambiguity to put an end to disputes and conflicts among people, which is one of the Shariah-approved objectives.
During the time of the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him), people used to lease their cultivated lands with contracts that either included an ambiguous rent or entailed injustice to the tenant. Hence, the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) forbade taking rent or share of the land to prevent such contracts. The rent or share here means: The rent agreed upon between the owner, and the lessee is an amount specified from the beginning of the fruits produced by this land, and the land may produce this amount and may not, in which case the one who cultivates it will not be capable of fulfilling his contract. Hence, this was forbidden so they would not deceive the other or wrongfully consume his brother's property.
As for leasing in return for gold, silver, or cash, there is nothing wrong with it, as in the two Sahīh Collections - the wording is that of Muslim - Hanzhalah ibn Qays reported: "That he asked Rāfi‘ ibn Khadīj about leasing land, and he said: The Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) forbade leasing land. He said: I said: Even in return for gold and silver? He said: If it is in return for gold and silver, there is no harm in it." Also in the two Sahīh Collections, Ibn ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him and his father) reported: "The Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) agreed with the people of Khaybar to work and cultivate in return for half of the fruits or crops produced." Therefore, the owner is allowed to lease it in return for a standard percentage of what is cultivated therein, like one-fourth or one-third of its produce..

1536

Jābir reported: The Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) forbade the sale of produce several years in advance. Another version reads: Selling fruits years in advance..

Commentary : Islam cares about protecting people's properties and is keen on not wasting them. It has clarified the manner of dealing with fixed assets and cash and how to manage selling and buying in such a way that guarantees the absence of uncertainty between the transactors and the removal of ambiguity from the sold item.
In this Hadīth, Jābir ibn ‘Abdullah (may Allah be pleased with him and his father) narrates that the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) forbade the sale of selling in advance, or selling fruits years in advance, which is selling the fruits of trees and palm trees for two years or more, knowing that such fruits have not been created yet. This is a Gharar sale (a sale of uncertainty) because it involves selling something non-existent, ambiguous, undeliverable, and not owned by the contractor. So, it is a sale that involves a great deal of uncertainty and ambiguity.
One of the rationales behind this prohibition is the waste of money involved as the sold item might not be achieved, and he would have, thus, spent his money in vain.
The Hadīth shows the Prophet's keenness to establish financial relations among people based on sound grounds to protect the rights of all parties involved..

1536

Jābir reported: The Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) forbade selling the white land (uncultivated land) for two or three years..

Commentary : Islam cares about protecting people's property and is keen on not wasting them. It has clarified the manner of dealing with fixed assets and cash and how to manage selling and buying in such a way that guarantees the absence of uncertainty between the transactors and the removal of ambiguity from the sold item.
In this Hadīth, Jābir ibn ‘Abdullah (may Allah be pleased with him and his father) narrates that the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) forbade selling the white land, which is the land that has no trees or plants. What is meant by selling it here is its "Kirā’" (leasing), which means taking a share of the fruits as a rent for the land. It was called "sale" because it refers to selling a benefit. His saying: "Two or three years" indicates that the land may not yield a product during one of the contract years. Hence, its cultivator will need to fulfill his contract. For this reason, the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) made the original state of the land dominant in the contract so that none of them would deceive the other or consume his brother's property wrongfully.
As for leasing in return for gold, silver, or cash, there is nothing wrong with that, for in the two Sahīh Collections - the wording is that of Muslim - Hanzhalah ibn Qays reported: "That he asked Rāfi‘ ibn Khadīj about leasing land, and he said: The Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) forbade leasing land. He said: I said: Even in return for gold and silver? He said: If it is in return for gold and silver, there is no harm with that."
The Prohibition in this Hadīth is from uncertainty in leasing land in return for something ambiguous or not guaranteed of its fruits and how the transaction should be transparent and known to avoid discord and wasting people's properties..

1541

Abu Hurayrah reported: the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) gave a concession for the sale of ‘Arāyā (unpicked ripe dates for dry dates) by estimation when they are less than - or he said: equal to - five Wasqs (a standard measure)..

Commentary : In the pre-Islamic era of ignorance, there were types of Riba-based sales. When Islam came, it rectified and refined such sale transactions and established the fair sale, which is free from Riba (usury). It forbade all types of sales that involve a possibility of Riba and that involve injustice.
In this Hadīth, Abu Hurayrah (may Allah be pleased with him) reports that the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) "gave a concession," i.e., allowed and permitted, "the sale of ‘Arāyā": A type of sale that takes the following form: Buying fresh dates after becoming ripe on the date palms for dry dates. So, the fruits on the date palm are given to the needy to eat therefrom whenever they like. What is on the date palms is estimated and dry dates are taken in exchange. It was called the ‘Arāya sale because the owner of the date palm gives it to a needy person, i.e., he strips it of its fruits for his sake. However, the Shariah set a condition that this should be done "by estimation," i.e., with a similar number of dried dates for the unpicked fruits. This is because some people would witness the season of ripe dates and wish to feed their children therefrom while having no date palms or money. Hence, the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) wanted to show kindness to them. He also stipulated that this should be of a measure or weight less than "five Wasqs", and the "Wasq" is a standard measure that is equal to sixty Sā‘s, i.e. (130.5kg) one hundred thirty kilograms and a half. Therefore, five Wasqs are equal to almost (653kg) six hundred fifty-three kilograms.
This means: The Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) granted them a concession regarding this kind of sale with this amount only because it could be mistakenly thought to be Riba, as the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) forbade selling fruits for fruits of the same type, which is called a Muzābanah sale (selling something definite for an indefinite amount of its kind). It is as if the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) made for them the exception of the ‘Arāya sale from Muzābanah and restricted it to five Wasqs to avoid the possibility of Riba.
His saying: "Or equal to five Wasqs" refers to the doubt that one of the Hadīth narrators had, and he was Dāwūd ibn al-Husayn, as he did not remember whether it was five Wasqs or less than five Wasqs.
The Hadīth clarifies the concession granted regarding one of the sale transactions out of alleviation and facilitation for the Ummah.
It also points out that the specified amount in the ‘Arāya sale transactions is five Wasqs..

1547

Ibn ‘Umar reported: We did not see anything wrong with Khibr until last year when Rāfi‘ claimed that the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) forbade it. [Another version reads]: So, we abandoned it on account of that. [Another version reads]: Rāfi‘ has forbidden us from benefitting from our land..

1547

Hanzhalah ibn Qays al-Ansāri reported: I asked Rāfi‘ ibn Khadīj about leasing land in return for gold and silver, he replied: "There is no harm in it. At the time of the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) the people used to lease lands in return for the yield of what grows on the banks of large rivers and the beginnings of water streams or the yield of certain parts of the land. Some of the harvest would be destroyed and some would remain safe. This was the only system the people had for renting lands, and thus, he forbade it. If the rent is something known and guaranteed, there is no harm in it.".

Commentary : During the pre-Islamic era of ignorance, there prevailed types of transactions that involved massive oppression and injustice. When Islam came, it established fair sales and forbade whatever involved oppression. Hence, it forbade what entailed fraud, uncertainty, and ambiguity to stop discord and dispute among people, which is one of the Shariah-approved objectives. At the time of the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him), people used to lease lands in return for a share of the yield as rent. The Tābi‘i Hanzhalah ibn Qays al-Ansāri asked the Companion Rāfi‘ ibn Khadīj (may Allah be pleased with him) about leasing it, i.e., renting it in return for gold and silver, which are meant here to refer to the dinar and dirham. This is a question about leasing land in return for gold and silver instead of leasing it in return for part of the yield. Rāfi‘ (may Allah be pleased with him) replied that there is no objection to leasing land in return for gold and silver, and he said: "At the time of the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) the people used to lease lands in return for the yield of what grows on the banks of large rivers," which are the watercourses coming from the wide river. It was said: What grows on the banks of the watercourse, and it was said: What grows around the brooklets. "And the beginnings of water streams," which are the beginnings of small rivers, "or the yield of certain parts of the land," i.e., types of the cultivated crops. This means: the owner allocates to himself the parts that would yield the best fruits or the finest crops, and the rest is for the tenant.
Rāfi‘ said: "Some of the harvest would be destroyed and some would remain safe," i.e., either the harvest of the owner or that of the tenant is destroyed, so one of them is wronged. "This was the only system the people had for renting lands, and thus, he forbade it," i.e., the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) prohibited this kind of rent given the Jahālah (ambiguity) that it involved, and Jahālah is Gharar (uncertainty). If the rent, however, is something known and guaranteed, i.e., a known rent in cash, then there is no objection to leasing the land in return for such rent.
The Hadīth points out the permissibility of leasing land in return for a known amount of cash money..

1548

Rāfi‘ ibn Khadīj reported: At the time of the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him), we used to lease land based on Muhāqalah so that we would lease it in return for one-third or one-quarter of the yield or a specified amount of food. One day, a man from among my paternal uncles came and said: The Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) has forbidden us from something beneficial for us, but obedience to Allah and His Messenger is more beneficial for us. He has forbidden us to lease land based on Muhāqalah and to lease it in return for one-third or one-quarter of the yield and for a specified amount of food. He commanded the landowner to cultivate it or to give it to someone else to cultivate. He disliked leasing it or anything else. [Another version reads]: We used to lease land based on Muhāqalah, leasing it in return for one-third or one-quarter of the yield..

Commentary : In the pre-Islamic era of ignorance, there prevailed types of sale that brimmed with oppression and injustice. When Islam came, it established fair sales and forbade whatever involved oppression. Hence, it forbade whatever involved fraud, uncertainty, and ambiguity to end disputes and conflicts among people, which is one of the Shariah-approved objectives.
In this Hadīth, Rāfi‘ ibn Khadīj (may Allah be pleased with him) reports that they used to lease land based on Muhāqalah during the time of the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him). There are different opinions regarding the meaning of Muhāqalah. It is said: It means leasing the land in return for wheat, as interpreted in some versions, which is called Muhārathah by the cultivators. It is said: It means the cultivation of land in return for a known share of its produce, like one-third, one-fourth, or the like as mentioned in this Hadīth. It is said: It means selling food in its ears in return for wheat grains. It is said: It means selling crops before fully growing. His saying: "And for a specified amount of food," i.e., by taking a specified share of the fruits as a rent for the land, and all this entails ambiguity in the contract between the owner and the lessee. Then, Rāfi '(may Allah be pleased with him) reported that things continued in this way until one day, one of his paternal uncles - it is said: His uncle Zhahīr ibn Rāfi '- came and informed them that the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) forbade them from something beneficial for them, referring to Muhāqalah, which was what they obtained in return for using the land so that they would benefit and the worker would benefit as well. However, this benefit, in fact, is a partial benefit, and perhaps it will not be safe from harm, as its fruits might be ruined, which would lead to the loss of the right of one of them. "But obedience to Allah and His Messenger is more beneficial for us," i.e., obeying Allah and His Messenger (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) to what he guides us is more beneficial for us than this assumed benefit of Kirā’ and Muzāra‘ah that we used to practice. In fact, responding to the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) is better and more beneficial for their religion and worldly life. One of their ways of practicing Muhāqalah was leasing land in return for one-third or one-fourth of its yield or a specified amount of food, i.e., by taking a share of the fruits as a rent for the land. So, the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) commanded the landowner to cultivate it himself or give it to someone to cultivate. The Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) disliked "leasing it or anything else," i.e., anything related to leasing. It is said: This was during the early days of emigration out of compassion for them; they had either to cultivate it or to let it be cultivated by others from their emigrant brothers. Then, he (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) granted a concession for leasing. It was reported that there is no harm in leasing in return for gold, silver, or cash, as in the two Sahīh Collections, Hanzhalah ibn Qays reported: "That he asked Rāfi‘ ibn Khadīj about leasing land, and he said: The Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) forbade leasing land. He said: I said: Even in return for gold and silver? He said: If it is in return for gold and silver, there is no harm in it." Also in the two Sahīh Collections, Ibn ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him and his father) reported: "The Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) agreed with the people of Khaybar to work and cultivate in return for half of the fruits or crops produced." Therefore, it is permissible for the owner to rent it in return for a standard percentage of what is cultivated therein, like one-fourth or one-third of its produce. The prohibition refers to whatever involves risk, ambiguity, and uncertainty. The most famous among such transactions was where the landowner used to specify for himself part of the land and what it produced.
The Hadīth highlights the fact that Allah Almighty and His Messenger (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) never forbid benefits and interests; rather, they forbid evil consequences and whatever leads to them..

1549

‘Abdullah ibn as-Sā’ib reported: We entered upon ‘Abdullah ibn Ma‘qil and asked him about Muzāra‘ah (sharecropping). He said: Thābit claimed that the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) forbade Muzāra‘ah and commanded Mu’ājarah (leasing land for rent), and he said: There is no harm in it..

Commentary : In the pre-Islamic era of ignorance, there prevailed types of sales that brimmed with oppression and injustice. When Islam came, it established fair sales and forbade whatever involved oppression. Hence, it forbade whatever involved fraud, uncertainty, and ambiguity to end disputes and conflicts among people, which is one of the Shariah-approved objectives.
In this Hadīth, Thābit ibn ad-Dahhāk (may Allah be pleased with him) reports that the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) forbade Muzāra‘ah, which is leasing the land in return for part of it and working on the land for part of its fruit production. The prohibition here refers to whatever involves risk, ambiguity, and uncertainty, and the most famous among such transactions was the one where the landowner used to specify for himself part of the land and what it produced. However, apart from this, it is permissible for the owner to lease it for a standard percentage of what is cultivated therein, like one-fourth or one-third of its produce, as it is mentioned in the two Sahīh Collections that Ibn ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him and his father) reported: "The Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) agreed with the people of Khaybar to work and cultivate in return for half of the fruits or crops produced."
The Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) commanded and made it permissible for them to practice Mu’ājarah instead of Muzāra‘ah and it means taking a known rent in gold, silver, or cash because this kind of lease is the farthest from uncertainty and ambiguity. In the two Sahīh Collections, Hanzhalah ibn Qays reported: "That he asked Rāfi‘ ibn Khadīj about leasing land, and he said: The Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) forbade leasing land. He said: I said: Even in return for gold and silver? He said: If it is in return for gold and silver, there is no harm in it.".

1551

Ibn ‘Umar reported: 'Umar ibn al-Khattāb expelled the Jews and the Christians from the land of Hijāz, and when the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) conquered Khaybar, he wanted to expel the Jews from that place, for when the land was conquered, it came to belong to Allah, His Messenger, and the Muslims. Hence, he wanted to expel the Jews from it. However, the Jews asked the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) to leave them there on condition that they should do all its work and have half the produce. The Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) said to them: We shall leave you there on that condition for as long as we wish. So, they stayed there until ‘Umar expelled them to Taymā’ and Arīhā’..

Commentary : Some of the Jewish tribes were living in Madīnah, and they kept betraying Muslims and breaching their covenants with the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) during his lifetime and with his Companions after his death. So, some of them made covenants with them, whereas others declared war against them.
In this Hadīth, ‘Abdullah ibn ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him and his father) reports that the Caliph ‘Umar ibn al-Khattāb (may Allah be pleased with him) expelled the Jews and the Christians, i.e., he deported them from the land of Hijāz, namely Makkah and Madīnah and their surroundings.
Ibn ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him and his father) reports that when the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) gained victory over the people of Khaybar and overcame them in the seventh year of Hijrah, and it was a village inhabited by the Jews almost 168 kilometers away from Madīnah from the direction of the Levant, he (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) wanted to expel the Jews from it, for when the land of Khaybar was conquered by Muslims, it became a possession of Allah, His Messenger, and Muslims. This clearly shows that the land was no longer owned by the Jews after being conquered by Muslims; rather, the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) distributed it among the victorious Muslims and it became among their possessions. What is meant by it being a possession of Allah and His Messenger is that some of its shares were given to the Muslims' public treasury.
On knowing that the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) wanted to deport them from Khaybar, the Jews asked him to allow them to stay in it and leave them on condition that they would work therein in the trees and the land in return for half of its fruits, whereas the other half would be for him, and he (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) agreed to the condition they stipulated for themselves. His saying: "For as long as we wish", was an exception made by the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) to the condition of their stay. It means that if Muslims wanted to expel you from that place, you would have to leave, as the Jews were not entitled to anything if Muslims had a different opinion. The agreement was concluded on such terms, and the Jews remained in Khaybar and stayed therein during the time of the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) and during the caliphate of Abu Bakr as-Siddīq (may Allah be pleased with him) until 'Umar ibn al-Khattāb (may Allah be pleased with him) became the caliph. During his time, Muslims were of the opinion of expelling the Jews from the Peninsula, and this acted as an invalidation of the contract between the Muslims and the Jews, and 'Umar (may Allah be pleased with him) expelled them from that place to Taymā' and Arīhā'.
Taymā’ is a place on the way of Madīnah and Tabūk city toward the Levant. Historically and geographically, it is located northwest of the Arabian Peninsula. It is almost 264 kilometres away to the east of Tabūk city and nearly 420 kilometres away to the north of Madīnah, whereas Arīhā’ was a village in the Levant.
The reason why ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him) expelled the Jews was narrated in Al-Bukhāri Collection where ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him) said: ‘Abdullah ibn ‘Umar went to his property there and was attacked at night, and his hands and feet were injured, and as we have no enemies there except them, they are our enemies and the ones whom we suspect, and I have made up my mind to exile them. So, he exiled them and gave them the price of the fruits they were entitled to in the form of money, camels, and goods, including saddles, ropes, etc. In the two Sahīh Collections, the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) said: "Expel the polytheists from Arabia."
The Hadīth shows that agricultural land is leased to the landowner for a known portion of its fruits, whereas the rest goes to its cultivator.
It points out that a Muslim ruler has the right to conclude treaties, make whatever exceptions he wants, and revoke such treaties based on the agreed-upon conditions, provided that all this is for the benefit of Muslims.
It highlights the fact that dealing with the People of the Book should be for what brings benefit, not harm, to the Muslim Ummah, along with being careful and taking precautions against them..

Book of Hadith

| Hadiths

Narrated Anas ibn Maalik (may Allah be pleased with him):We used to travel with the Prophet ﷺand neither did the fasting persons criticize those who were not fasting, nor did those who were not fasting criticize the fasting ones. .

Narrated Naafi‘ narrated that Ibn ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him)recited the ayah: "They had a choice either to fast or to feed a poor person for every day and said that the ayah was abrogated. .

‘Narrated Aa’ishah (may Allah be pleased with her):Allah's Messengerﷺsaid, "Whoever died and he ought to have fasted (the missed fast days of Ramadan) then his guardians must fast (i.e., make up for them) on his behalf." .

Sahl ibn Sa‘d(may Allah be pleased with him) narrated that Allah's Messenger ﷺ said, "People will remain on the right path as long as they hasten to break their fast.".

Abu Hurayrah (may Allah be pleased with him) reported that the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) said: "No son can repay a father unless he finds him a slave and buys him and emancipates him." Another version reads: "No son can repay his father.".

Abu Hurayrah reported: The Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) forbade the Hasāh sale (throwing pebble sale) and the Gharar sale (uncertainty sale)..

Ibn ‘Abbās reported that the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) said: Whoever buys food should not sell it until he measures it. I said to Ibn ‘Abbās: Why? He said: Do you not see them transacting with gold, whereas the food is deferred?.

Jābir ibn ‘Abdullāh reported: The Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) forbade selling a heap of dried dates, whose measure is unknown, for a specified amount of dried dates..

Jābir reported: The Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) forbade leasing land and selling it ahead for years, and selling fruits before ripening..

Jābir ibn ‘Abdullāh reported: The Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) forbade taking of rent or share of land..

Jābir reported: The Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) forbade the sale of produce several years in advance. Another version reads: Selling fruits years in advance..

Jābir reported: The Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) forbade selling the white land (uncultivated land) for two or three years..

Abu Hurayrah reported: the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) gave a concession for the sale of ‘Arāyā (unpicked ripe dates for dry dates) by estimation when they are less than - or he said: equal to - five Wasqs (a standard measure)..

Narrated Anas ibn Maalik (may Allah be pleased with him):We used to travel with the Prophet ﷺand neither did the fasting persons criticize those who were not fasting, nor did those who were not fasting criticize the fasting ones.
.

Narrated Naafi‘ narrated that Ibn ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him)recited the ayah: "They had a choice either to fast or to feed a poor person for every day and said that the ayah was abrogated.
.

‘Narrated Aa’ishah (may Allah be pleased with her):Allah's Messengerﷺsaid, "Whoever died and he ought to have fasted (the missed fast days of Ramadan) then his guardians must fast (i.e., make up for them) on his behalf."
.