logo

| 2 Hadiths

Hadith
2587
 ‘Aamir narrated:
I heard Al-Nu‘maan ibn Basheer (may Allah be pleased with him) on the pulpit saying, "My father gave me a gift but ‘Amrah bint Rawaahah (my mother) said that she would not agree to it unless he made Allah's Messengerﷺ as a witness to it. So, my father went to Allah's Messengerﷺ and said, 'I have given a gift to my son from ‘Amrah bint Rawaahah, but she ordered me to make you as a witness to it, O Allah's Messengerﷺ!' Allah's Messenger ﷺ asked, 'Have you given (the like of it) to everyone of your children?' He replied in the negative. Allah's Messengerﷺ said, ‘Fear Allah, and be just to all your children (i.e., treat them all on an equal footing).' My father then returned and took back his gift."
.

Commentary :
Every guardian is enjoined to be fair and treat those under his care on an equal footing. A father is a guardian and he is responsible for those under his care, i.e., his wife and children, and establishing the enjoined equality between them entails that he should not favor any of his children over the others in terms of gift-giving, giving some and denying the others.
In this hadeeth, Al-Nu‘maan ibn Basheer Al-Ansaaree (may Allah be pleased with him) related that his father Basheer gave him a gift, which was a male servant. His mother Umm Al-Nu‘maan had asked his father for that servant, as recorded in Saheeh Al-Bukhaaree and Saheeh Muslim. ‘Amrah bint Rawaahah, his mother, (may Allah be pleased with her) said to her husband that she would not agree to such a gift unless he made Allah's Messengerﷺ as a witness to it, aiming to make it binding. So, Basheer (may Allah be pleased with him) went to Allah's Messengerﷺ and related to him the matter and that his wife ordered him to make the Prophet ﷺ as a witness to it. He ﷺ asked him, “Have you given (the like of it) to everyone of your children?” He (may Allah be pleased with him) replied in the negative. Allah's Messengerﷺ said, 'Fear Allah, and be just to all your children (i.e., treat them all on an equal footing).' The aim of such a command was to foster mutual accord and affection between siblings, eliminating the causes of discord and hatred, and helping them show the enjoined dutifulness towards their father. Basheer (may Allah be pleased with him) obeyed the Prophet’s ﷺcommand, returned, and took back his gift to establish equality between all his children.
The hadeeth urges parents to establish equality between children in terms of gift-giving.
.

2590
Asmaa’ (may Allah be pleased with her) narrated:
Once I said, "O Allah's Messengerﷺ! I have no property except what has been given to me by Al-Zubayr (i.e., her husband). May I give in charity therefrom?" The Prophet ﷺ said, "Give in charity and do not withhold it; otherwise Allah, Exalted is He, will withhold it back from you . "
.

Commentary : A wife is entrusted with her husband’s wealth and she shall be held accountable by Allah, Exalted is He, for it. It is incumbent on her to preserve his wealth, take care of it, take from it what she needs only (without excess or waste), and spend from it reasonably.
In this hadeeth Asmaa’ bint Aboo Bakr Al-Siddeeq (may Allah be pleased with them) relates that she once said to the Prophet ﷺ, "O Allah's Messengerﷺ! I have no property except what has been given to me by Al-Zubayr ibn Al-‘Awwaam (i.e., her husband),” meaning he gave her to spend therefrom on the household needs. She (may Allah be pleased with her) added: “May I give in charity therefrom?" The Prophet ﷺ said, "Give in charity and do not withhold it; otherwise Allah, Exalted is He, will withhold it back from you.” The Prophet’s ﷺstatement means, ‘Do not withhold wealth, but rather spend in charity, for withholding wealth may be a cause for being deprived of having it blessed and increased by Allah, Exalted is He. Another version of the hadeeth recorded by Al-Bukhaaree and Muslim reads: “Spend according to your means,” meaning spend therefrom reasonably as long as you afford it, even if you can only give very little in charity, and do not hoard wealth and refrain from spending in charity, fearing that your wealth might be exhausted, lest you would be deprived of a blessed Rizq (i.e., provisions).
The Prophet ﷺ may have commanded her to do so and did not ask her to seek her husband’s permission because he ﷺ knew of the leniency of Al-Zubayr (may Allah be pleased with him) for which he was known. It is allowable for a wife to spend reasonably from her husband’s wealth (without his knowledge) as long as she knows that he would approve of such disposal of his wealth, that he would not dislike such an act, that she habitually does so and he approves of it, or when she spends in charity small amounts that do not affect the affordability of supporting their dependents, and she would not exceed the proper limits nor aim to waste his wealth. It was narrated on the authority of ‘Aa’ishah (may Allah be pleased with her) that the Prophet ﷺ said: “When a woman gives some of the food in her house (in charity without her husband’s prior knowledge), not wasting it, she will have her reward for what she has given and her husband will have his for what he earned. The same applies to a storekeeper; in no respect does the one diminishe the reward of the other.” [Al-Bukhaaree and Muslim].
It is deduced from the hadeeth that spending in charity is a reason for having one’s wealth blessed and increased, and that generosity begets abundant Rizq (i.e., provisions).
It is also inferred therefrom that stinginess and withholding from giving (charity), especially the obligatory Zakaah, incurs the loss and ruin of wealth.
.

2592
Kurayb, the free slave of Ibn ‘Abbaas (may Allah be pleased with them), narrated that Maymoonah bint Al-Haarith (may Allah be pleased with her) told him that she manumitted a slave-girl without taking the permission of the Prophet ﷺ. On the day when it was her turn to be with the Prophet ﷺ, she said, "Do you know, O Allah's Messengerﷺ, that I have manumitted my slave-girl?" He ﷺ said, "Have you really?" She (may Allah be pleased with her) replied in the affirmative. He ﷺ said, "You would have got more reward if you had given her (i.e., the slave-girl) to one of your maternal uncles."
.

Commentary :
Spending in charity is one of the best acts of righteousness, and there are numerous channels of giving and spending in charity.Some should be given precedence over the others depending on the situation and circumstances. Charity offered to one’s relatives is better and more rewardable.
In this hadeeth, the Mother of the Believers Maymoonah (may Allah be pleased with her) related that she manumitted a slave-girl without taking the permission of the Prophet ﷺ. She (may Allah be pleased with her) owned this slave-girl, and being a sane adult, her disposal of her own property is valid as per the laws of Islam with no need for her husband’s prior consent. On the other hand, she (may Allah be pleased with her) had known that the Prophet ﷺ would not disapprove of her disposal, and that he ﷺ would even like such act, which did not constitute a violation of the proper conduct of a woman towards her husband in Islam.
On the day when it was her turn to spend the night with the Prophet ﷺ, she said, "Do you know, O Allah's Messengerﷺ,that I have manumitted my slave-girl?" He ﷺ said, "Have you really?" She (may Allah be pleased with her) replied in the affirmative. He ﷺ said, "You would have got more reward if you had given her (i.e., the slave-girl) to one of your maternal uncles,” meaning that it would have been better and more rewardable to give this slave-girl to her maternal uncles to serve them, since they needed a servant, than manumitting her. Her maternal relatives belonged to Banee Hilaal and her mother’s name was Hind bint ‘Awf ibn Zuhayr Al-Haarith (may Allah be pleased with them).
The hadeeth urges Muslims to uphold ties of kinship, and underlines the abundant reward designated for such a worshipful act..

2606
Narrated Aboo Hurayrah (may Allah be pleased with him)
Allah's Messengerﷺ owed a man some debt (and that man demanded it very harshly). The Companions (may Allah be pleased with them) wanted to harm him, but the Prophet ﷺ said to them, "Leave him (unharmed); one who has a right is entitled to speak (i.e., claim his right)." He ﷺ then added, "Buy (a camel) of the same age and give it to him." They (may Allah be pleased with them) said, "We cannot get except a camel of an older age than that of his." He ﷺ said, "Buy it and give it to him, as the best amongst you is he who pays back his debt in the most handsome way.”
.

Commentary :
The Prophet ﷺ was a merciful teacher, a gentle educator, and a kind mentor. Whenever he ﷺ witnessed someone’s mistake, he ﷺ would not harshly reprimand, rebuke, or alienate the doer, and whenever he ﷺ witnessed something right, he ﷺ would praise and laud it, and reward the doer handsomely.
In this hadeeth, It was narrated on the authority of Aboo Hurayrah (may Allah be pleased with him) that Allah's Messengerﷺ owed a man some debt (and that man demanded it very harshly). The creditor was discourteous and impolite in demanding the repayment of the debt, as reported in the version of the hadeeth recorded in Saheeh Al-Bukhaaree and Saheeh Muslim. The Companions (may Allah be pleased with them) wanted to harm him verbally or physically, but they refrained from doing so out of politeness towards the Prophet ﷺ, and he said to them, "Leave him (unharmed);” and this mirrored the Prophet’s ﷺgood moral character, kindness, and endurance of people’s harshness despite his ability to retaliate against him, “the one who has a right is entitled to speak (i.e., claim his right)." This means that Allah, Exalted is He, deems it allowable for a person to claim his rights, be he a creditor, landlord, or worker, provided that he does not infringe upon people’s rights. The unpaid debt was a camel. The Prophet ﷺ then added, "Buy (a camel) of the same age and give it to him." The Companions (may Allah be pleased with them) could not get except an older, better, and more valuable camel than that of the man. The Prophet ﷺ commanded them to give it to him to repay the debt handsomely. He ﷺ explained the reason for giving him an older, better, and more valuable camel by saying, "the best amongst you is he who pays back his debt in the most handsome way.”
This means that the best of people is the one who is the kindest to others, and fulfills people’s rights, by the repayment of debts or other rights.
It is deduced from the hadeeth that one may delegate another person to repay his debts.
It is also inferred therefrom that one may loan an animal to someone.
It also deduced that whoever owes a debt or is liable to any other financial rights, should repay the debts or fulfill them handsomely.
It is also inferred that a debtor should endure the harshness of a creditor when claiming his rights..

2613
Narrated Ibn ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him):
Once the Prophet ﷺ went to the house of Faatimah (may Allah be pleased with her) but did not enter it. ‘Alee (may Allah be pleased with him) came and she told him about that. When ‘Alee asked the Prophet ﷺ about it, he ﷺ said, "I saw a (multicolored) decorated curtain on her door. I am not interested in worldly pleasures." ‘Alee went to Faatimah (may Allah be pleased with them) and told her about it. Faatimah said, "I am ready to dispense with it in the way he ﷺ suggests." The Prophet ﷺ ordered her to send it to such-and-such needy people.
.

Commentary : The Prophet ﷺ was led the most ascetic life and renounced the worldly pleasures, because he ﷺ knew well the essence and true nature of the fleeting worldly life. This worldly life is a short-lived phase during which a Muslim should perform as many worshipful acts and good deeds as possible, to taste eternal bliss in Paradise. The Prophet ﷺ keenly instilled these meanings within the hearts and minds of his family and Companions (may Allah be pleased with them).
In this hadeeth, ‘Abadullaah Narrated Ibn ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him) that the Prophet ﷺ went once to the house of Faatimah (may Allah be pleased with her) but did not enter it. ‘Alee (may Allah be pleased with him) came and found her concerned and distressed. He (may Allah be pleased with him) asked her about it and she (may Allah be pleased with her) told him of what the Prophet ﷺ did. When ‘Alee asked the Prophet ﷺ about it, he ﷺ informed him of the reason for not entering their house: that they had a (multicolored) decorated curtain on the door. The Prophet ﷺ disliked the use of such a curtain merely because it contradicts the lauded asceticism; it is neither unlawful nor disliked to use curtains on the doors as per the laws of Islam. However, the Prophet ﷺ merely disliked it because it was multicolored and decorated, i.e., luxurious, and he ﷺ renounced such worldly pleasures. He ﷺ remarked: “I am not interested in worldly pleasures," meaning that he ﷺ did not like or pursue such worldly luxuries. He ﷺ only sought after the Hereafter, and disliked for his own beloved daughter what he ﷺ disliked for himself, namely, enjoying such luxuries and pleasures in the worldly life.
 ‘Alee went to Faatimah (may Allah be pleased with them) and told her about it. Faatimah (may Allah be pleased with her) said, "I am ready to dispense with it in the way he ﷺ suggests." The Prophet ﷺ ordered her to send it to such-and-such needy people, to use it or avail themselves of its price.
.

2614
‘Alee (may Allah be pleased with him) narrated:
The Prophet ﷺ gave me a silken dress as a gift and I wore it. When I saw the signs of anger on his face, I cut it into pieces and distributed it among my womenfolk.”
.

Commentary : Islamic teaching regarding dress code and adornment is clearly defined in the Book of Allah, Exalted is He, and the Sunnah of His Prophet ﷺ. The Islamic Laws of Islam has set general guidelines that must be taken into account regarding men’s and women’s clothing.
In this hadeeth, ‘Alee ibn Aboo Taalib (may Allah be pleased with him) narrated that the Prophet ﷺgave him a silken garment as a gift. The Arabic word used in the hadeeth is Hullah, which was a suit of two garments (woven with silk stripes). The Prophet ﷺ had forbidden men from wearing silk. When he ﷺ saw ‘Alee (may Allah be pleased with him) wearing it, anger was written all over his face! When he (may Allah be pleased with him) saw the signs of anger on his face, he cut it into pieces and distributed it among his womenfolk, because he (may Allah be pleased with him) did not take another wife besides Faatimah (may Allah be pleased with her) during the lifetime of the Prophet ﷺ.
This was further clarified by the version recorded in Saheeh Muslim reading: “Divide it among the Faatimahs (i.e., your womenfolk) to make head covers,” meaning Faatimah, the daughter of the Prophet ﷺ, Faatimah bint Asad, the mother of ‘Alee ibn Aboo Taalib, and Faatimah bint Hamzah ibn ‘Abd Al-Muttalib (may Allah be pleased with them).
It is inferred from the hadeeth that it is allowable to give gifts from one’s property even if it is prohibited or disliked to wear such a gift, because the owner is entitled to dispose of it by means of sale or gift to whomever he wishes from those who are allowed to wear or use it, like women and young boys in this case.
.

2615
Narrated Anas (may Allah be pleased with him):
A Jubbah (i.e., cloak) made of thick silken cloth was presented to the Prophet ﷺ, and he used to forbid people to wear silk. So, people were pleased to see it. The Prophet ﷺsaid, "By Him in Whose Hands Muhammad's soul is, the handkerchiefs of Sa‘d ibn Mu‘aadh in Paradise are better than this." Anas (may Allah be pleased with him) added, "The present was sent to the Prophet ﷺ by Ukaydir (a Christian) from Dawmah..

Commentary : The Prophet ﷺ led the most ascetic life and was the keenest in renouncing worldly pleasures, and he ﷺ used to instill these values within his Companions (may Allah be pleased with him), ensuring that their hearts were fixated on and attached to the Hereafter and the eternal bliss prepared by Allah, Exalted is He, for them in Paradise.
In this hadeeth, Narrated Anas (may Allah be pleased with him) that Ukaydir (a Christian Arab ruler) of Dawmah Al-Jandal, a town near Tabook, northern Saudi Arabia, gifted the Prophet ﷺ a Jubbah. This ruler was seized by Khaalid ibn Al-Waleed (may Allah be pleased with him) when he was sent by the Prophet ﷺto Tabook in 9 A.H. He (may Allah be pleased with him) killed this Christian ruler’s brother and took him prisoner. The Prophet ﷺ released him on the condition of paying the Jizyah (i.e., head tax on non-Muslim citizens living under the protection of Muslim rule). This ruler gifted the Prophet ﷺ a Jubbah (i.e., cloak) made of thick silken cloth, and it captured the admiration of people. The Prophet ﷺ used to forbid people to wear silk. Since people were pleased to see it, the Prophet ﷺsaid, "By Him in Whose Hands Muhammad's soul is,” a wording that was often used by the Prophet ﷺ when making an oath, “the handkerchiefs of Sa‘d ibn Mu‘aadh in Paradise are better than this." This is a reference to Sa‘d’s least valuable possessions in Paradise, because handkerchiefs – used to clean the hands and remove impurities - are the least possessions a person will be given therein. The least valuable possessions of Sa‘d in Paradise shall be better than this silken Jubbah that they admired much, because the bliss in Paradise will be like what no eyes have ever seen, no ears have ever heard of, and which has never crossed your hearts or minds. Allah, Exalted is He, Says (what means): {And no soul knows what has been hidden for them of comfort for eyes as reward for what they used to do.} [Quran 32:17].
The hadeeth highlights the virtues of Sa‘d ibn Mu‘aadh (may Allah be pleased with him) and proves that he shall be admitted to Paradise.
It is also deduced from the hadeeth that the Prophet ﷺ used to accept gifts from non-Muslims..

2617
Narrated Anas ibn Maalik (may Allah be pleased with him):
A Jewess brought a poisoned (cooked) sheep for the Prophet ﷺwho ate from it. She was brought to the Prophet ﷺ and he was asked, "Shall we kill her?" He ﷺ said, "No." I continued to see the effect of the poison on the palate of the mouth of Allah's Messengerﷺ.
.

Commentary :
The Prophet ﷺ was the humblest of all people, and a manifestation of his good moral character was that he ﷺ accepted the gifts offered to him from anyone, even small gifts and even if the gift-giver was a non-Muslim, to win his heart and encourage him to embrace Islam. The Jews took advantage of that when they knew of his graciousness, and tried to kill him by serving him poisonous food.
In this hadeeth, Anas ibn Maalik (may Allah be pleased with him) stated that a Jewish woman, named Zaynab bint Al-Haarith, who was married to Salaam ibn Mishkam, gifted the Messenger of Allah ﷺ a poisoned sheep after the battle of Khyber. She cooked the meat for the Prophet ﷺ and put poison in it. The Prophet ﷺ ate from it, but Allah, Exalted is He, protected him from the immediate effects of the poison and he ﷺ did not die. However, the effect of the poison remained in his body. Anas (may Allah be pleased with him) said: “Icontinued to see the effect of the poison on the palate of the mouth of Allah's Messenger ﷺ.” It seems that the effect of the poison remained visible, in that some black marks or the like could be seen on palate of the mouth of Allah's Messenger ﷺ. This woman was brought to the Prophet ﷺ. The version of the hadeeth recorded in Saheeh Muslim reads: “(When the effects of this poison were felt by him) she was brought to the Prophet ﷺ and he asked her about that, whereupon she said: “I had determined to kill you.” Thereupon he ﷺ said: ‘Allah will never give you the power to do it.’ (It is possible that this was ‘Alee’s statement).”
The Companions (may Allah be pleased with him) asked the Messenger of Allah ﷺ permission to kill her, but he ﷺ refused to have her killed on the spot. This is why he ﷺ forbade them from killing her. However, it was authentically reported that she was killed as narrated in Sunan Aboo Daawood. The Prophet ﷺ killed her, or gave her to the guardians of the blood (i.e., ‘Asabah, or blood male relatives from the father's side) of Bishr ibn Al-Baraa’ ibn Ma’roor, who had eaten from it and died; his guardians had the woman killed in Qisaas (i.e., retribution). To reconcile between the two versions of the hadeeth, it could be said that the Prophet ﷺ did not kill her upon knowing of the poison she put in the sheep and refused the companions’ request to kill her, but when Bishr ibn Al-Baraa’ died of this poison, he ﷺ handed her over to his guardians, and they killed her by virtue of Qisaas (i.e., retribution). It is authentically reported that he ﷺ did not kill her immediately and it is also authentically reported that he ﷺ killed her afterward.
The hadeeth highlights the divine protection bestowed upon the Prophet ﷺ; Allah, Exalted is He, Says (what means): {And Allah will protect you from the people.} [Quran 5:67].
It also underlines a miracle with which the Messenger of Allah ﷺ was aided, as Allah, Exalted is He, delivered him from the poison that killed others.
It is deduced from the hadeeth that it is allowable to accept gifts from non-Muslims.
.

2618
‘Abd Al-Rahmaan ibn Abee Bakr (may Allah be pleased with them) narrated:
We were one-hundred and thirty persons accompanying the Prophet ﷺ who asked us whether anyone of us had food. There was a man who had about a Saa‘ of wheat which was mixed with water then. A tall pagan with long matted unkempt hair came driving sheep. The Prophet ﷺ asked him, "Will you sell us (a sheep) or give it as a present?" He said, "I will sell you (a sheep)." The Prophet ﷺbought a sheep and it was slaughtered. He ﷺ ordered that its liver and other abdominal organs be roasted. By Allah, the Prophet ﷺ gave every person of the one-hundred-and-thirty a piece of that; he gave all those of them who were present; and kept the shares of those who were absent. He ﷺthen put its meat in two huge basins and all of them ate to their fill, and even then, more food was left in the two basins which were carried on the camel (or said something like it).
.

Commentary :
Allah, Exalted is He, supported His Prophet ﷺ with miracles, and imparted His blessings through him. An example of such a blessing was increasing small quantities of food to suffice large groups of people, by the blessing of the Prophet ﷺ.
In this hadeeth, ‘Abd Al-Rahmaan ibn Abee Bakr (may Allah be pleased with them) narrated that there were one-hundred and thirty people accompanying the Prophet ﷺ,who asked them whether anyone of them had food. There was a man who had about a Saa‘ of wheat which was mixed with water. A tall pagan with long matted unkempt hair pagan came driving sheep. The Prophet ﷺ asked him, "Will you sell us (a sheep) or give it as a present?" He said, "I will sell you (a sheep)." The Prophet ﷺ bought a sheep and it was slaughtered and cooked. He ﷺ ordered that its liver and other abdominal organs be roasted. ‘Abd Al-Rahmaan (may Allah be pleased with him) swore by Allah, Exalted is He, that the Prophet ﷺ gave every person of the one-hundred-and-thirty a piece of that liver; he gave all those of them who were present; and kept the shares of those who were absent! He ﷺordered the meat to be put in two huge wooden basins and all of them ate to their fill, and even then, more food was left in the two basins which were carried on the camel, and this was a miracle performed by the Prophet ﷺ.
It is deduced from the hadeeth that it is allowable to buy from non-Muslims and accept their gifts.
It is also inferred therefrom that Muslims are urged to share their food whenever necessary.
It is also deduced that a person may swear to confirm his statement, even if he is truthful.
It is also inferred therefrom that it is allowable to buy things from an unknown person until one comes to know of that which entails caution or makes it incumbent to refrain from engaging in business transactions with him, such as usurpation, theft, or their like.
.

2620
Asmaa’ bint Aboo Bakr (may Allah be pleased with her) narrated:
My mother came to me during the lifetime of Allah's Messengerﷺ and she was a pagan. I said to Allah's Messenger (seeking his verdict), "My mother has come to me and she desires to receive a reward from me, shall I keep good relations with her?" The Prophet ﷺ said, “Yes, keep good relation with her.”
.

Commentary : Upholding ties of kinship and dutifulness towards parents are among the good manners preached by Islam and instilled in the hearts of Muslims. The enjoined dutifulness and upholding of kinship ties are not exclusive to Muslims, and are also required for non-Muslim relations, especially close relatives such as the parents, siblings, etc.
In this hadeeth, Asmaa’ bint Abee Bakr (may Allah be pleased with her) stated that her mother, Qutaylah bint Al-‘Uzzaa, who was a pagan,came to her during the lifetime of Allah's Messenger ﷺ. Another version of the hadeeth recorded in Saheeh Al-Bukhaaree and Saheeh Muslim reads: “My mother who was a polytheist came to me when he (the Prophet) ﷺ entered into treaty with Quraysh,” meaning in the period between Al-Hudaybiyah Peace Treaty and the conquest of Makkah. Asmaa’ (may Allah be pleased with her) was then married to Al-Zubayr ibn Al-‘Awwaam (may Allah be pleased with him). She (may Allah be pleased with her) sent to Allah's Messenger (seeking his verdict) and told him that her mother wanted to maintain good relations with her and win her heart, since she offered her gifts and aspired to receive a reward or something else from her, but that her mother was not inclined to Islam. She (may Allah be pleased with her) asked the Prophet ﷺ as to whether she should keep good relations with her, despite the fact that she held onto disbelief. The Prophet ﷺ said, “Yes, keep good relations with her,” meaning uphold ties of kinship with her despite her disbelief.
It is deduced from the hadeeth that it is allowable for a Muslim person to uphold ties of kinship with his non-Muslim relatives.
The hadeeth underlines the merits of Asmaa’ bint Aboo Bakr (may Allah be pleased with them), who keenly sought the Prophet’sﷺ verdict beforehand, and mindfully asked about the relevant religious ruling before acting..

2622
Narrated Ibn ‘Abbaas (may Allah be pleased with him):
The Prophet ﷺ said, "The bad example is not for us. He who takes back his present is like a dog that swallows back its vomit."
.

Commentary :
Taking back gifts is a reprehensible act and awful behavior that contradicts chivalry, and does not conform with a good moral character or sound human nature. Therefore, the Prophet ﷺ warned against it and likened such a deed to the ugliest and most heinous act to alienate Muslims from it.
In this hadeeth, the Prophet ﷺ stated that it is unbecoming of Muslims to approve of or do such an act; he ﷺ said, "The bad example is not for us. He who takes back his present is like a dog that swallows back its vomit.” In this hadeeth, he ﷺ likened the gift-giver who takes back his gift to a dog that swallows its vomit. The statement underlines that the believers should not do such a reprehensible act, in which we resemble animals. This simile is rarely used in the Laws of Islam texts, which indicates the gravity and heinousness of such act. The Prophet ﷺ likened it to vomit rather than any other impurity to reflect how disgusting and repugnant that is; it is quite revolting for a person to swallow his vomit, and one should detest and find it equally revolting to take back his gifts.
.

2624
‘Abdullah ibn ‘Ubaydullaah ibn Abee Maleekah narrated that the tribe of Suhayb, the freed slave of Ibn Jud‘aan, laid claim to two houses and a room that they claimed that the Prophet ﷺ had given to Suhayb. Marwaan said: "Who will testify as witness on your behalf?" They said: "Ibn ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him).” So, they called him, and he corroborated their claim that the Prophet ﷺ gave Suhayb two houses and a room. Marwaan based his judgment on Ibn ‘Umar's testimony.".

Commentary :
The settlement of people’s disputes is a great role and Islam has strictly regulated the judiciary process and sternly warns against the gravity of passing judgments and rulings without knowledge or acting on one’s sinful desires. Hence, a ruler is enjoined to be substantive (and firm) when settling disputes and adjudicating allegations.
In this hadeeth, the Taabi’ee (a Muslim who saw at least one of the Companions) ‘Abdullah ibn ‘Ubaydullaah ibn Abee Maleekah narrated regarding the tribe of Suhayb ibn Sinaan Al-Roomee (may Allah be pleased with him), the freed slave of ‘Abdullah ibn Jud‘aan who had bought and freed him. The tribe of Suhayb (may Allah be pleased with him) laid claim to two houses and a room that they claimed that the Prophet ﷺ had given to Suhayb (may Allah be pleased with him). A house referred to a roofed building and it translates into Bayt in Arabic because it the place where one spends the night (as denoted by the Arabic term); a room is one section of a house. The tribe of Suhayb referred to his children and descendants: Hamzah, Sa‘d, Saalih, Sayfee, ‘Abbaad, ‘Uthmaan, Habeeb, and Muhammad. They claimed these two houses and room and argued that the Prophet ﷺ had given them to their father (may Allah be pleased with him), and that they had inherited them from him. Marwaan ibn Al-Hakam, the governor of Al-Madeenah appointed by Mu‘aawiyah (may Allah be pleased with him), requested that they should provide substantial proofs to support their claim. He said, "Who will testify as witness on your behalf?" It is possible that two of them referred the dispute to the governor and the rest of them gave their consent to it. Marwaan addressed the two claimants, as suggested by the wording of the Arabic text, and they said: "Ibn ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him).” Marwaan called for Ibn ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him) to testify, and he corroborated their claim that the Prophet ﷺ had given Suhayb (may Allah be pleased with him) the two houses and a room. The wording of the Arabic text indicates that Ibn ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him) took an oath affirming their claim. Thereupon, Marwaan based his judgment on Ibn ‘Umar's testimony, and gave them the two houses and room. It was also said that he passed his judgment and verdict based on Ibn ‘Umar’s testimony and their oath.
.

2625
Jaabir (may Allah be pleased with him) narrated:
The Prophet ﷺgave a verdict that a lifelong gift belongs to the one to whom it was given.
.

Commentary :
Islam urged interdependence, solidarity, and cooperation between people. The enjoined interdependence and solidarity take many forms, such as Zakaah, charity, and gifts, one of which is lifelong gifts.
In this hadeeth, Jaabir (may Allah be pleased with him) narrated that the Prophet ﷺ gave a verdict that a lifelong gift belongs to the one to whom it was given. An example of a lifelong gift is when someone says to another, “My house is now yours as long as I should live,” or “You may reside in my house until I die.” This gift is binding as per the laws of Islam and it is impermissible for the gift-giver to take it back and annul the gift. This is the case when the gift-giver offers the recipient the gift without stipulating any conditions that it should be returned to him after a specified period of time. For example, a person might say, ‘I gift you my house as long as you should live,” or “throughout your life,” or any similar wording indicating the same meaning. Such wordings are indicative of lifelong gifts. The gifted property becomes the property of the beneficiary or receiver and his or her heirs afterward, according to the verdict of the Prophet ﷺ. In the same vein, the Prophet ﷺ said: “If anyone gives a life-tenancy it goes to the one to whom it is given, both during his lifetime and after his death, and to his descendants (heirs).” [Muslim].
.

2626
It was narrated on the authority of Aboo Hurayrah (may Allah be pleased with him) that the Prophet ﷺ said, "The ‘Umraee (i.e., lifelong gift) is permissible." ‘Ataa’ said, "Jaabir (may Allah be pleased with him) narrated the same to me on the authority of the Prophet ﷺ.”
.

Commentary :
Islam has urged interdependence, solidarity, and cooperation between people. The enjoined interdependence and solidarity take many forms, such as Zakaah, charity, and gifts, one of which is lifelong gifts.
This hadeeth highlights the permissibility of lifelong gifts.  An example of such gifts is when someone says to another, “My house is now yours as long as I should live,” or “You may reside in my house until I die.” This gift is binding as per the laws of Islam, and it is impermissible for the gift-giver to take it back and annul the gift. This is the case when the gift-giver offers the recipient the gift without stipulating any conditions that it should be returned to him after a specified period of time. For example, a person might say, ‘I gift you my house as long as you should live,” or “throughout your life,” or any similar wording indicating the same meaning. Such wordings are indicative of lifelong gifts. The gifted property becomes the property of the beneficiary or receipt and his or her heirs afterward, according to the verdict of the Prophet ﷺ. In the same vein, the Prophet ﷺ said: “If anyone gives a life-tenancy it goes to the one to whom it is given, both during his lifetime and after his death, and to his descendants (heirs).” [Muslim].

.

2628
Ayman narrated:
I went to ‘Aa’ishah (may Allah be pleased with her) and she was wearing a coarse dress costing five Dirhams. ‘Aa’ishah (may Allah be pleased with her) said, "Look up and see my slave-girl who refuses to wear it in the house though during the lifetime of Allah's MessengerﷺI had a similar dress which no woman desiring to appear elegant (before her husband) failed to borrow from me."
.

Commentary : The Companions (may Allah be pleased with him) devoted their good deeds exclusively to Allah, Exalted is He, aspiring to His rewards only rather than worldly gains. Thus, Allah, Exalted is He, caused them to be the means to perfect the divine light of guidance bestowed upon humanity through the Prophet ﷺ, and rewarded them by conferring upon them abundant wealth and blessings.
In this hadeeth, Ayman Al-Habashee Al-Makhzoomee narrated that he went to ‘Aa’ishah (may Allah be pleased with her) while she was wearing a coarse dress costing five Dirhams. The Arabic word used in the hadeeth is Qitr, which referred to a reddish coarse cotton dress from Yemen. It was also said that Qitr meant a dress made of a coarse fabric or cotton in particular. Another saying was that the name Qitr was derived from a village in Bahrain called Qatar. The point is that such a dress was coarse, and its price was about five Dirhams (of silver). ‘Aa’ishah (may Allah be pleased with her) disapprovingly said, “Look up and see my slave-girl who refuses to wear it in the house,” meaning that she looked down on such an inexpensive dress in the house. She (may Allah be pleased with her) then described the changed conditions in comparison to her past life conditions during the lifetime of the Prophet ﷺ. She added that during the lifetime of Allah's Messenger ﷺ she had a similar dress that the women of Al-Madeenah admired so much that no woman desiring to appear elegant (before her husband in their wedding) failed to borrow from her, since people were less fortunate and had smaller properties, and therefore perceived such inexpensive dress as elegant and expensive at that time.
This underlines the changed life conditions and the riches acquired by Muslims after the conquests. Women used to borrow such a coarse dress to beautify themselves for their husbands in weddings, but ‘Aa’ishah’s slave-girl refused to wear such a dress in the house!
It is deduced from the hadeeth that it is allowable to lend and borrow clothes, and the same goes for other precious jewelry and jewels for a bride and others.
It is also inferred therefrom that a woman may wear elegant dresses inside her home and what some servants may wear.
It also highlights the humbleness of ‘Aa’ishah (may Allah be pleased with her) and the fact that she renounced worldly pleasures at times when she (may Allah be pleased with her) was given wealth.
.

1510
Abu Hurayrah (may Allah be pleased with him) reported that the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) said: "No son can repay a father unless he finds him a slave and buys him and emancipates him." Another version reads: "No son can repay his father.".

Commentary : The right that children owe to their parents is great, and being dutiful to them in Islam is among the greatest means of drawing closer to Allah, as Allah has made dutifulness to them one of the broadest ways of reaching Paradise. Allah has also made not obeying them among the major sins and misdeeds that lead their perpetrators to disgracing punishment.
In this Hadīth, the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) clarifies that the child, whether male or female, cannot repay his father - the mother is included and so are the grandparents who are the same as the parents - and fulfill his right in full for his kindness towards him except when he finds his father a slave, buys him with his own money, and emancipates him and sets him free. In other words, the son seeks to reach him by buying him, and it is well known that he only buys him to free him from slavery, not to have him as his own slave or to be the master of his father. So, nothing fulfills the father's right over his son, no matter what the son does, except this act. This is because Islam came when slavery and serfdom were widespread and a common habit of the Arabs, and there were bondmaids and slaves in every house.
It was said: If a man took possession of his father, the latter would be free by mere possession and [there is] no need to say: I set him free. Similarly, if he took possession of his mother, she would be free by mere possession and [there is] no need to say: I set her free.
The Hadīth encourages children to be dutiful and kind to their parents.
It also denotes the merit of emancipating slaves..

1513
Abu Hurayrah reported: The Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) forbade the Hasāh sale (throwing pebble sale) and the Gharar sale (uncertainty sale)..

Commentary : During the pre-Islamic era of ignorance, there prevailed types of transactions that involved massive oppression and injustice. When Islam came, it established fair sales and forbade whatever involved oppression. Hence, it forbade what involved fraud and ambiguity to stop disagreement and dispute among people, which is one of the Shariah-approved objectives.
In this Hadīth, Abu Hurayrah (may Allah be pleased with him) narrates that the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) forbade the Hasāh sale, which was one of the sales practiced by the people of Jāhiliyyah. If the seller or the buyer threw a pebble, that would be a sign of finalizing the sale. It had three forms: First: The seller says to the buyer: I would sell you of these garments that on which the pebble I throw falls; or: I would sell you a piece of this land from here to the part that this pebble reaches. Second: Considering the act of throwing the pebble itself a sale by saying: If you throw the pebble at this garment, it will be sold to you at such-and-such. Third: Saying: You have the option to either accept or reject the sale until I throw this pebble. It was said: It means saying: Throw the pebble and whatever number comes out, I will be entitled to an equal number of dinars or dirhams. All these are forms of invalid sales that entail doing injustice to one of the two parties of the sale.
The Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) also forbade the Gharar sale. Gharar means danger, delusion, and deceit. This is a generalization after a specification, as it includes any sale that involves any kind of deceit, or that which is ambiguous or cannot be fulfilled. One of the rationales behind forbidding this sale is the fact that it is a waste of money, for one may not be able to get the sold item, which means that he spent his money in vain.
The Hadīth prohibits deception and fraud in sales.
It warns against consuming people's properties wrongfully.
It also points out that the object of a sale transaction must be something known and must have a known price..

1519
Abu Hurayrah (may Allah be pleased with him) reported that the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) said: Do not go out to meet what is being brought for trade. Whoever goes out to meet it and buys something thereof, when its master comes to the market, he will have the option..

Commentary : Selling and buying have rulings and etiquettes in Islam that a Muslim must adhere to fulfill justice in transactions and enjoy the pleasures of this worldly life and the Hereafter.
In this Hadīth, the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) forbids merchants from going out and receiving those people who transport commodities from one country to another. They must not receive them before arriving and being acquainted with the prices of commodities in such a country because this might harm the seller as they might buy from him at a lower price than its known price, which would result in harming the owner of the commodity by underestimating its price. Hence, the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) commanded the one who goes out to meet it and buys something thereof, and does not comply with the prohibition. So when "its master," i.e., the owner of the commodity, comes to the market, he will have the option either to effect the sale or take back his goods, for perhaps he did him injustice and wronged him regarding its price compared to its price in this country.
The Hadīth encourages truthfulness and transparency and the avoidance of deceit in commercial transactions.
It shows the Prophet's keenness on whatever brings goodness to his Ummah and his kindness towards them even when it comes to worldly interests..

1525
Ibn ‘Abbās reported that the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) said: Whoever buys food should not sell it until he measures it. I said to Ibn ‘Abbās: Why? He said: Do you not see them transacting with gold, whereas the food is deferred?.

Commentary : Allah Almighty has prescribed in sale what maintains people's rights, keeps them away from conflicts and quarrels, and repels harm from them.
In this Hadīth, the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) advises us saying that whoever buys food and wants to resell it, he "should not sell it" until he takes it after being measured and weighed. This is an indirect reference that the buyer should receive it and it becomes in his possession and knows its amount in a way that negates ambiguity. This is related to what is sold by measure as in this case, so it must be first measured until he receives it in full, then, he may sell it afterward. It is not lawful for him to sell it before measuring it, as it could be subject to excess or deficiency, which entails doing injustice and harm either to the seller or the buyer. Thereupon, Tāwūs ibn Kaysān - from the Tābi‘is - asked Ibn ‘Abbās (may Allah be pleased with him and his father): "Why?" i.e., why did the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) stipulate this condition? Ibn ‘Abbās (may Allah be pleased with him and his father) said: "Do you not see them transacting with gold, whereas the food is deferred?" In other words, the seller used to take the price in gold dinars, and then he would delay the delivery of food to the buyer. Therefore, the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) stipulated that the buyer should not resell it until he receives it and it becomes in his possession. Another Hadīth in the two Sahīh Collections clarified that what he meant by that is to transfer the food to another place or to the markets where it is sold in order not to be monopolized or manipulate its price. So, he made it clear that the right thing is to transfer it to the markets, which are known to people, where food is sold and to take possession of it, since Qabd (taking possession) is a condition, and transferring it as mentioned fulfills this condition.
Moreover, in the two Sahīh Collections, the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) forbade reselling the food after buying it until he receives it in full, i.e., he should not adopt any procedure or dispose of it by selling it again unless he first takes what he has purchased and it becomes in his full possession. Only then, he can resell it. This guarantees preventing any harm to the seller, the buyer, or the dwellers of this country that could result in disputes and conflicts between people and, thus, inflict harm upon them.
The Hadīth shows the Prophet's keenness on whatever brings goodness to his Ummah and his kindness towards them even when it comes to worldly interests.
It highlights the prohibition of adopting sale methods that lead to the monopoly of goods and the rise in prices, or that cause harm to the parties involved in the sale transaction..

1530
Jābir ibn ‘Abdullāh reported: The Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) forbade selling a heap of dried dates, whose measure is unknown, for a specified amount of dried dates..

Commentary : The rulings of sale transactions in Islam revolve around honesty and the absence of uncertainty among the parties involved in the sale. The sold item must be known to both parties, in terms of type, quantity, and quality, in such a way that removes any ambiguity. The Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) forbade certain kinds of sales that involve Jahālah (ambiguity), Gharar (uncertainty), and Riba (usury).
This Hadīth clarifies some of these forbidden kinds of sales. Jābir ibn ‘Abdullah (may Allah be pleased with him and his father) narrates that the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him): "Forbade selling a heap of dried dates, whose measure is unknown," "Subrah" (heap): food that is collected in a pile and whose weight and quantity are unknown. This applies to all types of food; however, he mentioned here one type in particular, namely the dried dates, because it is their staple food; otherwise, the mentioned prohibition includes all types of measured food. In Muslim's version, he did not mention his saying: "of dried dates" at the end of the Hadīth, which indicates the inclusion of all types of food sold without knowing its amount in exchange for a known amount of its like. "For a specified amount of dried dates," i.e., he forbade selling an unknown amount for a known amount of the same type, like dried dates for dried dates, wheat for wheat, and barley for barley, as this involves ambiguity regarding the unmeasured food from one aspect besides involving Riba al-Fadl (usury of surplus) from another aspect, bearing in mind that ignorance about the equality between the sold and purchased items is like knowing that there is a surplus between them, which is clear Riba. If the items subject to Riba rulings are the same, then, they must be the same in measure and hand to hand. However, if they are of different types, then, there is nothing wrong with the surplus between them like in the case of selling dried dates for wheat, or barley for corn, and the same applies to selling for cash, gold, or silver.
The Hadīth clarifies how the Shariah regulates the process of selling and buying to avoid the occurrence of disputes..

1536
Jābir reported: The Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) forbade leasing land and selling it ahead for years, and selling fruits before ripening..

Commentary : In the pre-Islamic era of ignorance, there prevailed types of sale that brimmed with oppression and injustice. When Islam came, it established fair sales and forbade everything involving oppression. Hence, it forbade cheating in sale transactions. Putting an end to disputes and conflicts between the seller and the buyer is one of the objectives of the Shariah.
In this Hadīth, Jābir ibn ‘Abdullah (may Allah be pleased with him and his father) reports that the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) forbade "leasing land", which is renting it. The forbidden lease is that which is in return for some of its produce, which means that the rent agreed upon between the owner and the lessee is an amount specified from the beginning of the fruits produced by this land, which may or may not produce this amount. In this case, the one who cultivates it will not be capable of fulfilling his contract. However, there is nothing wrong with leasing land in return for gold, silver, or cash, as in the two Sahīh Collections, Hanzhalah ibn Qays reported: "That he asked Rāfi‘ ibn Khadīj about leasing land, and he said: The Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) forbade leasing land. He said: I said: Even in return for gold and silver? He said: If it is in return for gold and silver, there is no harm in it." Also in the two Sahīh Collections, Ibn ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him and his father) reported: "The Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) agreed with the people of Khaybar to work and cultivate in return for half of the fruits or crops produced." Therefore, the owner is allowed to lease it in return for a standard percentage of what is cultivated therein, like one-fourth or one-third of its produce.
He also forbade "selling it in advance for years." A version of Muslim reads: "Selling fruits in advance for years," which is selling the fruits of trees and palm trees for two years or more, knowing that such fruits have not been created yet. This is a Gharar sale (uncertain sale) because it involves selling something non-existent, ambiguous, undeliverable, and not owned by the contractor. So, it is a sale that involves a great deal of uncertainty and ambiguity.
The Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) also forbade "selling fruits before ripening," i.e., appearing to be ripe when it becomes colorful and its fruit appears and it becomes red or yellow, which is a sign of its good condition and safety from blight, and it becomes suitable for eating and selling.
The Hadīth shows the prohibition of every sale that involves ambiguity..

1536
Jābir ibn ‘Abdullāh reported: The Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) forbade taking of rent or share of land..

Commentary : In the pre-Islamic era of ignorance, there prevailed types of sales that brimmed with oppression and injustice. When Islam came, it established fair sales and forbade whatever involved oppression. Hence, it forbade whatever involved fraud, uncertainty, and ambiguity to put an end to disputes and conflicts among people, which is one of the Shariah-approved objectives.
During the time of the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him), people used to lease their cultivated lands with contracts that either included an ambiguous rent or entailed injustice to the tenant. Hence, the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) forbade taking rent or share of the land to prevent such contracts. The rent or share here means: The rent agreed upon between the owner, and the lessee is an amount specified from the beginning of the fruits produced by this land, and the land may produce this amount and may not, in which case the one who cultivates it will not be capable of fulfilling his contract. Hence, this was forbidden so they would not deceive the other or wrongfully consume his brother's property.
As for leasing in return for gold, silver, or cash, there is nothing wrong with it, as in the two Sahīh Collections - the wording is that of Muslim - Hanzhalah ibn Qays reported: "That he asked Rāfi‘ ibn Khadīj about leasing land, and he said: The Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) forbade leasing land. He said: I said: Even in return for gold and silver? He said: If it is in return for gold and silver, there is no harm in it." Also in the two Sahīh Collections, Ibn ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him and his father) reported: "The Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) agreed with the people of Khaybar to work and cultivate in return for half of the fruits or crops produced." Therefore, the owner is allowed to lease it in return for a standard percentage of what is cultivated therein, like one-fourth or one-third of its produce..

1536
Jābir reported: The Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) forbade the sale of produce several years in advance. Another version reads: Selling fruits years in advance..

Commentary : Islam cares about protecting people's properties and is keen on not wasting them. It has clarified the manner of dealing with fixed assets and cash and how to manage selling and buying in such a way that guarantees the absence of uncertainty between the transactors and the removal of ambiguity from the sold item.
In this Hadīth, Jābir ibn ‘Abdullah (may Allah be pleased with him and his father) narrates that the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) forbade the sale of selling in advance, or selling fruits years in advance, which is selling the fruits of trees and palm trees for two years or more, knowing that such fruits have not been created yet. This is a Gharar sale (a sale of uncertainty) because it involves selling something non-existent, ambiguous, undeliverable, and not owned by the contractor. So, it is a sale that involves a great deal of uncertainty and ambiguity.
One of the rationales behind this prohibition is the waste of money involved as the sold item might not be achieved, and he would have, thus, spent his money in vain.
The Hadīth shows the Prophet's keenness to establish financial relations among people based on sound grounds to protect the rights of all parties involved..

1536
Jābir reported: The Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) forbade selling the white land (uncultivated land) for two or three years..

Commentary : Islam cares about protecting people's property and is keen on not wasting them. It has clarified the manner of dealing with fixed assets and cash and how to manage selling and buying in such a way that guarantees the absence of uncertainty between the transactors and the removal of ambiguity from the sold item.
In this Hadīth, Jābir ibn ‘Abdullah (may Allah be pleased with him and his father) narrates that the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) forbade selling the white land, which is the land that has no trees or plants. What is meant by selling it here is its "Kirā’" (leasing), which means taking a share of the fruits as a rent for the land. It was called "sale" because it refers to selling a benefit. His saying: "Two or three years" indicates that the land may not yield a product during one of the contract years. Hence, its cultivator will need to fulfill his contract. For this reason, the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) made the original state of the land dominant in the contract so that none of them would deceive the other or consume his brother's property wrongfully.
As for leasing in return for gold, silver, or cash, there is nothing wrong with that, for in the two Sahīh Collections - the wording is that of Muslim - Hanzhalah ibn Qays reported: "That he asked Rāfi‘ ibn Khadīj about leasing land, and he said: The Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) forbade leasing land. He said: I said: Even in return for gold and silver? He said: If it is in return for gold and silver, there is no harm with that."
The Prohibition in this Hadīth is from uncertainty in leasing land in return for something ambiguous or not guaranteed of its fruits and how the transaction should be transparent and known to avoid discord and wasting people's properties..

1541
Abu Hurayrah reported: the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) gave a concession for the sale of ‘Arāyā (unpicked ripe dates for dry dates) by estimation when they are less than - or he said: equal to - five Wasqs (a standard measure)..

Commentary : In the pre-Islamic era of ignorance, there were types of Riba-based sales. When Islam came, it rectified and refined such sale transactions and established the fair sale, which is free from Riba (usury). It forbade all types of sales that involve a possibility of Riba and that involve injustice.
In this Hadīth, Abu Hurayrah (may Allah be pleased with him) reports that the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) "gave a concession," i.e., allowed and permitted, "the sale of ‘Arāyā": A type of sale that takes the following form: Buying fresh dates after becoming ripe on the date palms for dry dates. So, the fruits on the date palm are given to the needy to eat therefrom whenever they like. What is on the date palms is estimated and dry dates are taken in exchange. It was called the ‘Arāya sale because the owner of the date palm gives it to a needy person, i.e., he strips it of its fruits for his sake. However, the Shariah set a condition that this should be done "by estimation," i.e., with a similar number of dried dates for the unpicked fruits. This is because some people would witness the season of ripe dates and wish to feed their children therefrom while having no date palms or money. Hence, the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) wanted to show kindness to them. He also stipulated that this should be of a measure or weight less than "five Wasqs", and the "Wasq" is a standard measure that is equal to sixty Sā‘s, i.e. (130.5kg) one hundred thirty kilograms and a half. Therefore, five Wasqs are equal to almost (653kg) six hundred fifty-three kilograms.
This means: The Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) granted them a concession regarding this kind of sale with this amount only because it could be mistakenly thought to be Riba, as the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) forbade selling fruits for fruits of the same type, which is called a Muzābanah sale (selling something definite for an indefinite amount of its kind). It is as if the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) made for them the exception of the ‘Arāya sale from Muzābanah and restricted it to five Wasqs to avoid the possibility of Riba.
His saying: "Or equal to five Wasqs" refers to the doubt that one of the Hadīth narrators had, and he was Dāwūd ibn al-Husayn, as he did not remember whether it was five Wasqs or less than five Wasqs.
The Hadīth clarifies the concession granted regarding one of the sale transactions out of alleviation and facilitation for the Ummah.
It also points out that the specified amount in the ‘Arāya sale transactions is five Wasqs..

1547
Ibn ‘Umar reported: We did not see anything wrong with Khibr until last year when Rāfi‘ claimed that the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) forbade it. [Another version reads]: So, we abandoned it on account of that. [Another version reads]: Rāfi‘ has forbidden us from benefitting from our land..

Commentary : In the pre-Islamic era of ignorance, there prevailed types of sale that brimmed with oppression and injustice. When Islam came, it established fair sales and forbade whatever involved oppression. Hence, it forbade whatever involved fraud, uncertainty, and ambiguity to put an end to disputes and conflicts among people, which is one of the Shariah-approved objectives.
In this Hadīth, ‘Abdullah ibn ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him and his father) reports that they used to see nothing wrong with Khibr, i.e., they used to practice Mukhābarah (sharecropping), which is leasing the land in return for part of its produce, and the seed or sowing part is from the worker (the lessee). Things continued this way until the year preceding that year when Ibn ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him and his father) was narrating this Hadīth. A version of Muslim reads: "Ibn ‘Umar used to rent his farms during the time of the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him), and during the rule of Abu Bakr, ‘Umar, ‘Uthmān, and the early days of Mu‘āwiyah's caliphate until it was conveyed to him at the end of Mu‘āwiyah's caliphate." As Rāfi‘ ibn Khadīj (may Allah be pleased with him) reported that the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) forbade Mukhābarah. Thereupon, Ibn ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him and his father) refrained from Mukhābarah on account of what was narrated by Rāfi‘ (may Allah be pleased with him) from the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him).
In another version, Ibn ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him and his father) said: "Rāfi‘ has, indeed, forbidden us from benefitting from our land," i.e., Rāfi‘ ibn Khadīj (may Allah be pleased with him) forbade us from benefitting from our land through Mukhābarah.
Ibn ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him and his father) did not ask Rafi‘ for details about what was meant by the prohibition. In the two Sahīh Collections, Hanzhalah ibn Qays reported: "That he asked Rāfi‘ ibn Khadīj about leasing land, and he said: The Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) forbade leasing land. He said: I said: Even in return for gold and silver? He said: If it is in return for gold and silver, there is no harm in it." Also in the two Sahīh Collections, Ibn ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him and his father) reported: "The Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) agreed with the people of Khaybar to work and cultivate in return for half of the fruits or crops produced." Therefore, it is permissible for the owner to rent it in return for a standard percentage of what is cultivated therein, like one-fourth or one-third of its produce. The prohibition refers to whatever involves risk, ambiguity, and uncertainty. The most famous among such transactions was where the landowner used to specify for himself part of the land and what it produces..

1547
Hanzhalah ibn Qays al-Ansāri reported: I asked Rāfi‘ ibn Khadīj about leasing land in return for gold and silver, he replied: "There is no harm in it. At the time of the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) the people used to lease lands in return for the yield of what grows on the banks of large rivers and the beginnings of water streams or the yield of certain parts of the land. Some of the harvest would be destroyed and some would remain safe. This was the only system the people had for renting lands, and thus, he forbade it. If the rent is something known and guaranteed, there is no harm in it.".

Commentary : During the pre-Islamic era of ignorance, there prevailed types of transactions that involved massive oppression and injustice. When Islam came, it established fair sales and forbade whatever involved oppression. Hence, it forbade what entailed fraud, uncertainty, and ambiguity to stop discord and dispute among people, which is one of the Shariah-approved objectives. At the time of the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him), people used to lease lands in return for a share of the yield as rent. The Tābi‘i Hanzhalah ibn Qays al-Ansāri asked the Companion Rāfi‘ ibn Khadīj (may Allah be pleased with him) about leasing it, i.e., renting it in return for gold and silver, which are meant here to refer to the dinar and dirham. This is a question about leasing land in return for gold and silver instead of leasing it in return for part of the yield. Rāfi‘ (may Allah be pleased with him) replied that there is no objection to leasing land in return for gold and silver, and he said: "At the time of the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) the people used to lease lands in return for the yield of what grows on the banks of large rivers," which are the watercourses coming from the wide river. It was said: What grows on the banks of the watercourse, and it was said: What grows around the brooklets. "And the beginnings of water streams," which are the beginnings of small rivers, "or the yield of certain parts of the land," i.e., types of the cultivated crops. This means: the owner allocates to himself the parts that would yield the best fruits or the finest crops, and the rest is for the tenant.
Rāfi‘ said: "Some of the harvest would be destroyed and some would remain safe," i.e., either the harvest of the owner or that of the tenant is destroyed, so one of them is wronged. "This was the only system the people had for renting lands, and thus, he forbade it," i.e., the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) prohibited this kind of rent given the Jahālah (ambiguity) that it involved, and Jahālah is Gharar (uncertainty). If the rent, however, is something known and guaranteed, i.e., a known rent in cash, then there is no objection to leasing the land in return for such rent.
The Hadīth points out the permissibility of leasing land in return for a known amount of cash money..

1548
Rāfi‘ ibn Khadīj reported: At the time of the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him), we used to lease land based on Muhāqalah so that we would lease it in return for one-third or one-quarter of the yield or a specified amount of food. One day, a man from among my paternal uncles came and said: The Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) has forbidden us from something beneficial for us, but obedience to Allah and His Messenger is more beneficial for us. He has forbidden us to lease land based on Muhāqalah and to lease it in return for one-third or one-quarter of the yield and for a specified amount of food. He commanded the landowner to cultivate it or to give it to someone else to cultivate. He disliked leasing it or anything else. [Another version reads]: We used to lease land based on Muhāqalah, leasing it in return for one-third or one-quarter of the yield..

Commentary : In the pre-Islamic era of ignorance, there prevailed types of sale that brimmed with oppression and injustice. When Islam came, it established fair sales and forbade whatever involved oppression. Hence, it forbade whatever involved fraud, uncertainty, and ambiguity to end disputes and conflicts among people, which is one of the Shariah-approved objectives.
In this Hadīth, Rāfi‘ ibn Khadīj (may Allah be pleased with him) reports that they used to lease land based on Muhāqalah during the time of the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him). There are different opinions regarding the meaning of Muhāqalah. It is said: It means leasing the land in return for wheat, as interpreted in some versions, which is called Muhārathah by the cultivators. It is said: It means the cultivation of land in return for a known share of its produce, like one-third, one-fourth, or the like as mentioned in this Hadīth. It is said: It means selling food in its ears in return for wheat grains. It is said: It means selling crops before fully growing. His saying: "And for a specified amount of food," i.e., by taking a specified share of the fruits as a rent for the land, and all this entails ambiguity in the contract between the owner and the lessee. Then, Rāfi '(may Allah be pleased with him) reported that things continued in this way until one day, one of his paternal uncles - it is said: His uncle Zhahīr ibn Rāfi '- came and informed them that the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) forbade them from something beneficial for them, referring to Muhāqalah, which was what they obtained in return for using the land so that they would benefit and the worker would benefit as well. However, this benefit, in fact, is a partial benefit, and perhaps it will not be safe from harm, as its fruits might be ruined, which would lead to the loss of the right of one of them. "But obedience to Allah and His Messenger is more beneficial for us," i.e., obeying Allah and His Messenger (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) to what he guides us is more beneficial for us than this assumed benefit of Kirā’ and Muzāra‘ah that we used to practice. In fact, responding to the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) is better and more beneficial for their religion and worldly life. One of their ways of practicing Muhāqalah was leasing land in return for one-third or one-fourth of its yield or a specified amount of food, i.e., by taking a share of the fruits as a rent for the land. So, the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) commanded the landowner to cultivate it himself or give it to someone to cultivate. The Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) disliked "leasing it or anything else," i.e., anything related to leasing. It is said: This was during the early days of emigration out of compassion for them; they had either to cultivate it or to let it be cultivated by others from their emigrant brothers. Then, he (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) granted a concession for leasing. It was reported that there is no harm in leasing in return for gold, silver, or cash, as in the two Sahīh Collections, Hanzhalah ibn Qays reported: "That he asked Rāfi‘ ibn Khadīj about leasing land, and he said: The Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) forbade leasing land. He said: I said: Even in return for gold and silver? He said: If it is in return for gold and silver, there is no harm in it." Also in the two Sahīh Collections, Ibn ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him and his father) reported: "The Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) agreed with the people of Khaybar to work and cultivate in return for half of the fruits or crops produced." Therefore, it is permissible for the owner to rent it in return for a standard percentage of what is cultivated therein, like one-fourth or one-third of its produce. The prohibition refers to whatever involves risk, ambiguity, and uncertainty. The most famous among such transactions was where the landowner used to specify for himself part of the land and what it produced.
The Hadīth highlights the fact that Allah Almighty and His Messenger (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) never forbid benefits and interests; rather, they forbid evil consequences and whatever leads to them..

1549
‘Abdullah ibn as-Sā’ib reported: We entered upon ‘Abdullah ibn Ma‘qil and asked him about Muzāra‘ah (sharecropping). He said: Thābit claimed that the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) forbade Muzāra‘ah and commanded Mu’ājarah (leasing land for rent), and he said: There is no harm in it..

Commentary : In the pre-Islamic era of ignorance, there prevailed types of sales that brimmed with oppression and injustice. When Islam came, it established fair sales and forbade whatever involved oppression. Hence, it forbade whatever involved fraud, uncertainty, and ambiguity to end disputes and conflicts among people, which is one of the Shariah-approved objectives.
In this Hadīth, Thābit ibn ad-Dahhāk (may Allah be pleased with him) reports that the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) forbade Muzāra‘ah, which is leasing the land in return for part of it and working on the land for part of its fruit production. The prohibition here refers to whatever involves risk, ambiguity, and uncertainty, and the most famous among such transactions was the one where the landowner used to specify for himself part of the land and what it produced. However, apart from this, it is permissible for the owner to lease it for a standard percentage of what is cultivated therein, like one-fourth or one-third of its produce, as it is mentioned in the two Sahīh Collections that Ibn ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him and his father) reported: "The Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) agreed with the people of Khaybar to work and cultivate in return for half of the fruits or crops produced."
The Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) commanded and made it permissible for them to practice Mu’ājarah instead of Muzāra‘ah and it means taking a known rent in gold, silver, or cash because this kind of lease is the farthest from uncertainty and ambiguity. In the two Sahīh Collections, Hanzhalah ibn Qays reported: "That he asked Rāfi‘ ibn Khadīj about leasing land, and he said: The Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) forbade leasing land. He said: I said: Even in return for gold and silver? He said: If it is in return for gold and silver, there is no harm in it.".

1551
Ibn ‘Umar reported: 'Umar ibn al-Khattāb expelled the Jews and the Christians from the land of Hijāz, and when the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) conquered Khaybar, he wanted to expel the Jews from that place, for when the land was conquered, it came to belong to Allah, His Messenger, and the Muslims. Hence, he wanted to expel the Jews from it. However, the Jews asked the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) to leave them there on condition that they should do all its work and have half the produce. The Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) said to them: We shall leave you there on that condition for as long as we wish. So, they stayed there until ‘Umar expelled them to Taymā’ and Arīhā’..

Commentary : Some of the Jewish tribes were living in Madīnah, and they kept betraying Muslims and breaching their covenants with the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) during his lifetime and with his Companions after his death. So, some of them made covenants with them, whereas others declared war against them.
In this Hadīth, ‘Abdullah ibn ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him and his father) reports that the Caliph ‘Umar ibn al-Khattāb (may Allah be pleased with him) expelled the Jews and the Christians, i.e., he deported them from the land of Hijāz, namely Makkah and Madīnah and their surroundings.
Ibn ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him and his father) reports that when the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) gained victory over the people of Khaybar and overcame them in the seventh year of Hijrah, and it was a village inhabited by the Jews almost 168 kilometers away from Madīnah from the direction of the Levant, he (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) wanted to expel the Jews from it, for when the land of Khaybar was conquered by Muslims, it became a possession of Allah, His Messenger, and Muslims. This clearly shows that the land was no longer owned by the Jews after being conquered by Muslims; rather, the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) distributed it among the victorious Muslims and it became among their possessions. What is meant by it being a possession of Allah and His Messenger is that some of its shares were given to the Muslims' public treasury.
On knowing that the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) wanted to deport them from Khaybar, the Jews asked him to allow them to stay in it and leave them on condition that they would work therein in the trees and the land in return for half of its fruits, whereas the other half would be for him, and he (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) agreed to the condition they stipulated for themselves. His saying: "For as long as we wish", was an exception made by the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) to the condition of their stay. It means that if Muslims wanted to expel you from that place, you would have to leave, as the Jews were not entitled to anything if Muslims had a different opinion. The agreement was concluded on such terms, and the Jews remained in Khaybar and stayed therein during the time of the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) and during the caliphate of Abu Bakr as-Siddīq (may Allah be pleased with him) until 'Umar ibn al-Khattāb (may Allah be pleased with him) became the caliph. During his time, Muslims were of the opinion of expelling the Jews from the Peninsula, and this acted as an invalidation of the contract between the Muslims and the Jews, and 'Umar (may Allah be pleased with him) expelled them from that place to Taymā' and Arīhā'.
Taymā’ is a place on the way of Madīnah and Tabūk city toward the Levant. Historically and geographically, it is located northwest of the Arabian Peninsula. It is almost 264 kilometres away to the east of Tabūk city and nearly 420 kilometres away to the north of Madīnah, whereas Arīhā’ was a village in the Levant.
The reason why ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him) expelled the Jews was narrated in Al-Bukhāri Collection where ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him) said: ‘Abdullah ibn ‘Umar went to his property there and was attacked at night, and his hands and feet were injured, and as we have no enemies there except them, they are our enemies and the ones whom we suspect, and I have made up my mind to exile them. So, he exiled them and gave them the price of the fruits they were entitled to in the form of money, camels, and goods, including saddles, ropes, etc. In the two Sahīh Collections, the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) said: "Expel the polytheists from Arabia."
The Hadīth shows that agricultural land is leased to the landowner for a known portion of its fruits, whereas the rest goes to its cultivator.
It points out that a Muslim ruler has the right to conclude treaties, make whatever exceptions he wants, and revoke such treaties based on the agreed-upon conditions, provided that all this is for the benefit of Muslims.
It highlights the fact that dealing with the People of the Book should be for what brings benefit, not harm, to the Muslim Ummah, along with being careful and taking precautions against them..