| 2 Hadiths


Hadith
3101
Safiyyah(may Allah be pleased with her), the wife of the Prophet ﷺ, narrated that she came to visit Allah's Messenger ﷺ while he was in I‘tikaaf (i.e., spiritual retreat in the mosque to devote oneself exclusively to worship Allah during the last ten days of Ramadan). When she got up to return, Allah's Messenger ﷺgot up with her and accompanied her, and when he reached near the gate of the mosque close to the door (of the house) of Umm Salamah, the wife of the Prophet, two men from the Ansaar passed by them and greeted Allah's Messenger ﷺ and then went away. Allah's Messenger ﷺ addressed them saying, "Do not hurry! (She is my wife)."  They said, "Glorified be Allah! O Allah's Messenger ﷺ (You are far away from any suspicion)," and his saying was hard on them. Allah's Messenger ﷺ said, "Satan circulates in the mind of a person as blood does (in his body). I was afraid that Satan might put some (evil) thoughts in your minds."
.

Commentary :
Satan has always been the sworn enemy of human beings since the beginning of history. He entices and whispers to them to accuse others without evidence, and that is why the Prophet ﷺ used to warn his Companions (may Allah be pleased with them) against the (gravity of) satanic whisperings.
In this hadeeth, the Mother of the Believers, Safiyyah(may Allah be pleased with her)narrated that she came to visit Allah's Messenger ﷺ while he was observing I‘tikaaf (i.e., a retreat in the mosque to devote oneself exclusively to worship Allah) in the mosque during the last ten days of Ramadan. When she (may Allah be pleased with her) got up to return home, Allah's Messenger ﷺ got up with her and escorted her. When he ﷺ reached near the gate of the mosque close to the door (of the house) of Umm Salamah, the wife of the Prophet ﷺ, two men from the Ansaar passed by them and greeted Allah's Messenger ﷺ and then went away in a hurry, out of respect for the Prophet ﷺ when they (may Allah be pleased with them) saw him standing with one of his wives. The wording of the hadeeth suggests that they did not know that she was his wife. Allah's Messenger ﷺ addressed them saying, "Do not hurry! (She is my wife)."  They said, "Glorified be Allah! O Allah's Messenger ﷺ;” you are far above any suspicion. They were astonished by his saying, and it was hard on them that the Prophet ﷺ thought that they would even think ill of him! Allah's Messenger ﷺ said, "Satan circulates in the mind of a person as blood does (in his body). I was afraid that Satan might put some (evil) thoughts in your minds." He ﷺ informed them that he ﷺ feared that Satan should whisper to them and implant evil thoughts in their heads, driving them to think ill of the Prophet ﷺ, and this would have incurred their ruin. Therefore, he ﷺ hastened to inform them of the reality, edifying them and the following Muslim generations on the right thing to do, should any of them be in a similar situation.
The hadeeth underlines the permissibility of visiting a person observing I‘tikaaf in his place of seclusion.
It is inferred therefrom that one should eliminate all doubts and means that could lead others to think ill of him, by unveiling the truth to people at the proper time..

3104
Narrated `Abdullah: The Prophetﷺstood up and delivered a sermon and pointing to the house of `Aaishah (may Allah be pleased with her) (i.e. eastwards), he said thrice, "Affliction (will appear from) here," and "from where the horn of Satan comes out (i.e. from the East).
.

Commentary : The Prophet ﷺ would warn his nation of evil and tribulations and clarify to them some of their aspects so that the Muslims would be informed and able to avoid failing in those tribulations.

In this hadeeth, ‘Abdullah ibn ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him) reports that the Prophet ﷺ delivered a sermon one day, during which he ﷺ pointed eastwards – towards the direction of the lands of Persia and beyond or the lands of Najd, Rabee’ah and Mudar, as all of them are situated eastward of al-Madeenah. He ﷺ informed the Companions (may Allah be pleased with them) that tribulations would emerge from these lands, and he repeated his warning three times to emphasise it and ensure everyone could hear him.

His statement “from where the horn of Satan comes out” means that thence will be the base of his followers and supporters or dominion and strength. The False Messiah, the greatest affliction and tribulation that will befall humanity, will come out from the direction of these lands. It is said that the hadeeth refers to great tribulations and wars that afterwards emerged from Iraq like the Battle of the Camel, the battles of Siffeen and Harooraa, the afflictions of Banoo Umayyah and the khawaarij. All of those events emerged fromIraq and eastwards of Najd. It is reported on the authority of Ibn ‘Abbaas (may Allah be pleased with him): The Prophet ﷺ said, "Oh Allah, bless us in our Syria; O Allah, bless us in our Yemen." Those present said: "And in our Najd, O Messenger of Allah!" But he ﷺsaid, "O Allah, bless us in our Syria; O Allah, bless us in our Saa' and Mudd (measures representing food). O Allah bless us in our Shaam and Yemen." Those present said, "And in our Najd, O Messenger of Allah!" He ﷺ said, "There shall arise the horn of Satan, tribulations will emerge from there,andrepulsion is in the east." [ Reported by al-Tabaraanee].

The Prophet ﷺ in this hadeeth foretells some of the events that will take place in the future, which are considered from the unseen. The hadeeth serves as a warning against tribulations..

3107
Narrated `Isaa ibn Tahmaan: Anas (may Allah be pleased with him) brought out to us two worn-out footwear without hair and with pieces of straps. Later, Thaabit Al-Banaanee told me that Anas said that they were the shoes of the Prophet ﷺ.
.

Commentary : The Prophet ﷺ was ascetic in his life and totally detached from its pleasures, despite all the spoils and wealth Allah had granted him, as he was focused only on the Hereafter. He ﷺ set for us a great example in abstaining from worldly pleasures and sufficing with the minimum.

In this hadeeth, the Taab’iee ‘Isaa ibn Tahmaan reports that Anas ibn Maalik (may Allah be pleased with him) kept two old items of footwear (Arabic Na’l),i.e. a slingback that often does not cover the entire foot from above. One day, Anas showed them to people, and they were so old that the hair on them was worn out. They had front straps used to tighten the footwear to the foot. It was Thaabit al-Bunaanee who informed ‘Issaa ibn Tahmaan that they were the shoes of the Prophet ﷺ as he heard it directly from Anas – who was the servant of the Prophet ﷺ for ten years.

The hadeeth shows how the Companions (may Allah be pleased with them) were so keen on keeping the items of the Prophet ﷺ and would utilise them to teach people..

3108
Narrated Aboo Burdah:`Aaishah (may Allah be pleased with her) brought out to us a patched garment, and she said, "The soul of Allah's Messengerﷺwas taken away while he was wearing this."
According to the hadeeth from the way of Sulaymaan from Humayd, Aboo Burdah added, "Aaishah (may Allah be pleased with her)brought out to us a thick waist sheet like the ones made by the Yemenites, and also a garment of the type called Al- Mulabbadah."
.

Commentary : The Prophet ﷺ was ascetic in his life and totally detached from its pleasures, despite all the spoils and wealth Allah had granted him, as he was focused only on the Hereafter. He ﷺ set for us a great example in abstaining from worldly pleasures and sufficing with the minimum.

In this hadeeth, Aboo Burdah ibn Aboo Moosa al-Ash’aree reports that ‘Aaishah (may Allah be pleased with her), the Mother of the Believers, brought out a Kisaa Mulabbad i.e. a patched garment or a patched thick sheet. It is said that it is a garment that becomes thick from the middle, and it appearsthe term is only used in reference to garments made of wool. She (may Allah be pleased with her) told them that the Prophet ﷺ was wearing it at the time his blessed soul departed his noble body. The Prophet ﷺ used to wear with this garment a thick waist sheet made in Yemen to cover his private body parts and lower half. The reason the Prophet ﷺ wore these types of garments could be due to his humility and intent to abstain from living a soft life. It is possible that he ﷺ did it without intending it, since he would wear whatever was available for him.

The hadeeth shows how the Companions (may Allah be pleased with them) were so keen on keeping the relics of the Prophet ﷺ and benefitting from them in educating people. .

3110
Narrated `Alee ibn Al-Husayn: “When they reached Al-Madeenah after returning from Yazeed ibn Mu'aawaiyah after the martyrdom of al-Husayn ibn `Alee (may Allah bestow His Mercy upon him), Al-Miswar ibn Makhramah met him and said to him, "Do you have any need you may order me to satisfy?" `Alee said, "No." Al-Miswar said, Will you give me the sword of Allah's Messengerﷺfor I am afraid that people may take it from you by force? By Allah, if you give it to me, they will never be able to take it till I die." When `Alee ibn Aboo Taalib asked for the hand of the daughter of Aboo Jahal to be his wife besides Faatimah (may Allah be pleased with her), I heard Allah's Messengerﷺon his pulpit delivering a sermon in this connection before the people, and I had then attained my age of puberty. Allah's Messengerﷺsaid, "Faatimah is from me, and I am afraid she will be subjected to trials in her religion." The Prophetﷺthen mentioned one of his sons-in-law who was from the tribe of Banee ‘Abd Shams, and he praised him as a good son-in-law, saying, "Whatever he said was the truth, and he promised me and fulfilled his promise. I do not make that which is lawful forbidden, nor do I make that which is forbidden lawful, but by Allah, the daughter of Allah's Messengerﷺand the daughter of the enemy of Allah, (i.e. Aboo Jahl) can never get together.”.

Commentary : The Prophet ﷺ loved his daughter Faatimah (may Allah be pleased with her)ardently and wholeheartedly such that anything that would harm her was as if it harmed him personally.

In this hadeeth, ‘Alee ibn al-Husayn ibn ‘Alee, alias Zayn al-‘Aaabideen (may Allah be pleased with him), reports that after the martyrdom of al-Husayn ibn `Alee (may Allah be pleased with him), whose death was on the 10th of Muharram in the year 61 of Hijrah, he travelled along with members from the family of the Prophet ﷺ from Damascus –where Yazeed ibn Mu'aawaiyah was based – to al-Madeenah. There, al-Miswar ibn Muhramah embraced and welcomed ‘Alee ibn al-Husayn (may Allah be pleased with him) and asked him if there was anything that he needed so that he could fulfil it for him. ‘Alee ibn al-Husayn (may Allah be pleased with him) advised him that there was nothing that he needed. Then, he asked him to entrust him with the sword of the Prophet ﷺ to keep it safe for him, because he feared that others who did not know the true value of this sword would overpower him and take the sword from him by force. He swore to ‘Alee that if he kept the sword with him, neither Yazeed nor his supporters would be able to reach it except over his dead body.It is said that this sword could be the famous sword Thoo al-Faqaar.

The reason Miswar proposed to keep the swordwas only to protect it for ‘Alee ibn al-Husayn because at that time he was youngi.e.he feared people would overpower him and take it from him forcefully. His intent was to protect the sword of the Prophet ﷺ and keep it in safety for ‘Alee ibn al-Husayn (may Allah be pleased with him). It is said that he swore by Allah that hewould be able to protect it out of his confidence and trust in Allah that He would enable him to duly fulfil his promise.

Then, al-Miswar relates that ‘Alee ibn Abee Taalib (may Allah be pleased with him) asked for the hand of the daughter of Aboo Jahal to be his wife to have her as a co-wife with Faatimah (may Allah be pleased with her). After the news reached the Prophet ﷺ, he delivered a sermon on his pulpit in which he said that Faatimah was a part of him, and that he feared she would be subjected to trials in her religion because of jealousy. Then, he ﷺ mentioned one of his sons-in-law who was from the tribe of Banee ‘Abd Shams i.e. Al-‘Aas ibn al-Rabee’ ibn ‘Ad ‘Uzza ibn ‘Abd Shams who was the husband of his daughter Zaynab (may Allah be pleased with her) before Islam.He ﷺ praised him as a good son-in-law, saying, "Whatever he said was the truth, and he promised me and fulfilled his promise,” as he promised to send Zaynab to the Prophet ﷺ and he kept his promise. The Prophet ﷺ then added,“I do not make that which is lawful forbidden, nor do I make that which is forbidden lawful, but by Allah, the daughter of Allah's Messengerﷺand the daughter of the enemy of Allah, (i.e. Aboo Jahl) can never get together (as the wives of one man)” i.e. I do not say a word that contravenes the law of Allah but proceeding with this marriage proposal harms me (and yet I do not say that such marriage is unlawful). It is said that he ﷺ was referring to havingthe daughter of Aboo Jahl as a co-wife with Faatimah, which is to indicate that marrying the daughter of Aboo Jahl is lawful, but he disapproved his marriage to her because that would hurt the feelings of and harm Faatimah (may Allah be pleased with her), and the Prophet ﷺ mentioned that whatever harmed her harmed him. The Prophet ﷺpreserved his rank and the rank of his daughter by not allowing the daughter of the enemy of Allah to be her co-wife. He ﷺ even swore by Allah with confidence that the daughter of Allah's Messengerﷺand the daughter of the enemy of Allah, (i.e. Aboo Jahl) can never get together as the wives of one man. As such, this has become one of the forbidden marriages i.e. having the daughter of Allah's Messengerﷺand the daughter of the enemy of Allah (i.e. Aboo Jahl) as co-wives.

It is said that al-Miswar related the story of ‘Alee (may Allah be pleased with him) with the daughter of Aboo Jahl after requesting the sword for many reasons. One of which is that he wanted to say that as the Prophet ﷺ loved Faatimah (may Allah be pleased with her) so much, it is obligatory upon every believer to love her offspring.As the Prophet ﷺ was so considerate of her,gave importance toher feelings and wanted to ensure her happiness, he thuswanted to do the same, and ensure that which was in the best interestsof her grandson. Hence, he should be entrusted with the sword, as he would do all he could to serve ‘Alee ibn al-Husayn’s best interests.Another reason for narrating the story was to show that as the Prophet ﷺ swore by Allah while being confident that He would enable for his oath to be fulfilled, al-Miswar swore by Allah that he would protect the sword while being confident that Allah would enable him to protect it.

The hadeeth shows that it is forbidden to harm the Prophet ﷺ in any form and by any means. It shows the keen interest of the Companions to keep the items of the Prophet ﷺ and utilize them to teach and educate people. .

3111
Narrated Ibn Al-Hanafiyyah: If `Alee had spoken anything bad about `Uthmaan, then he would have mentioned the day when some persons came to him and complained about the Zakat officials of `Uthmaan. `Alee then said to me, "Go to `Uthmaan and say to him, 'This document contains the regulations of spending the alms of Allah's Messenger so order your Zakat officials to act according to it." I took the document to `Uthmaan, who said, "Take it away, for we are not in need of it." I returned to `Alee with it and informed him of that. He said, "Put it back in theplace from where you took it."
.

Commentary : This hadeeth clarifies the lofty mannerisms and good conduct of the Companions (may Allah be pleased with them) and their endeavours to avoid abusing each other or discussing things that would violate the honour of others.The reason for narrating this hadeeth as mentioned by Ibn Abee Shaybah in his work al-Musannaf is that Muhammad Ibn al-Hanafiyyah, the son of ‘Alee (may Allah be pleased with him) - al-Hanafiyyah was his mother’s name -was sitting with some people,and some of them started defaming ‘Uthmaan ibn Affaan (may Allah be pleased with him).He forbade them from doing that, so they asked him, “Did your father ‘Alee ever curse ‘Uthmaan?” He told them that he never cursed him, and if he had ever cursed or mentioned anything bad about him once, he would have done so on the day when some people came to him complaining about the Zakat collectors of ‘Uthmaan, whowere entrusted with the duty of collecting Zakat from people.‘Alee(may Allah be pleased with him) gave a written note to his son Muhammad and ordered him to go out to ‘Uthmaan (may Allah be pleased with him) and inform him that it contained a statement about the areas of spending the wealth of Zakat, as specified by the Prophet ﷺ; hence he could command the zakat collectors from his workers to act upon what was in it. Muhammad stated: I brought it to ‘Uthmaan, and he said, “Keep it away from us,” meaning, ‘take it away from us; we do not need it.’ This is because he was aware of what was in it.It was also said that he had something similar,which he ordered his workers to act upon. It is also possible that the charges against his Zakat collectors were not fully established before ‘Uthmaan.Alternatively, they may have been established, but political expedience required delaying the reprimand or criticising them regarding desirable acts and not obligatory ones.
When Muhammad returned to his father (may Allah be pleased with him) and told him what ‘Uthmaan(may Allah be pleased with him) had said, he commanded him to put the note back in the place from which he had taken it. He did not say anything more than that and did not say anything bad about ‘Uthmaan(may Allah be pleased with him) because this was the habit of the honourable Companions, that they used to think well of each other.
From the benefits that we can concludefrom this hadeeth isthat we should advise the rulers and clarify what happens from their representatives. It also expounds the virtue of ‘Alee(may Allah be pleased with him)..

3115
Narrated Jaabir ibn `Abdullah Al-Ansaaree: A man amongst us begot a boy whom he named Al-Qaasim. On that the Ansaar said, (to the man), "We will never call you Aboo-al-Qaasim and will never please you with this blessed title." So, he went to the Prophet and said, "O Allah's Messenger ﷺ! I have begotten a boy whom I named Al-Qaasim and the Ansaar said, 'We will never call you Aboo-al-Qaasim, nor will we please you with this title.' " The Prophet ﷺ said, "The Ansaar have done well. Name by my name, but do not name by my Kunya, for I am Qaasim.".

Commentary : Allah guidedthe Ansaar and inspired them to engage in everything that would help, revere and protect the rights of the Prophet ﷺ. One example of that is mentioned in this hadeeth, wherein Jaabir ibn ‘Abdullah(may Allah be pleased with him)reports that a child was born to a man from the Ansaar. He named him al-Qaasim, as he wished hisKunya (teknonym)to be Aboo al-Qaasim.However,the Ansaar objected and told him, “We will not call you Aboo Al-Qaasim” because that is the Kunya of the Prophet ﷺ, and we will not let you take this honour and be given the same teknonym of the Prophet ﷺ. The man went to the Prophet ﷺ and told him what had happened.So,the Prophet ﷺ remarked, “The Ansaar did well,” meaning, in upholding the honour and reverence of the Prophetﷺ, by preventing anyone from sharing his Kunya. Then, he ﷺdirected them to the alternative, saying, “Feel free to name after my name, however, avoid using my Kunya.” In other words, give your sons the name of Muhammad, but avoid using my Kunya (i.e. Aboo al-Qaasim).After, he ﷺ explained the reason and the cause of having his own Kunya: “I am Qaasim (distributor),” meaning: I grant everyone what he deserves, and in the hadeeth of Aboo Hurayrah (may Allah be pleased with him), according to al-Bukhaaree, “I place wealth where I am commanded to place,” i.e. I do not give anyone or withhold from giving anyone except by the permission of Allah; hence, whom I give little, then that is due to the decree of Allah, and whom I give more, then that is also due to the decree of Allah.
As can be noted, the Prophet ﷺ forbade people combining his name and histekonym (Kunya),i.e.Muhammad, Aboo al-Qaasim. It was said: the prohibition is against using his Kunya, irrespective of whether one is called Muhammad or not.And it was said: This prohibition is specific to his time ﷺ.
The hadeethindicates the permissibility of naming children with the names of the prophets, and the prophets and their names are clear of what contains or entails evil..

3117
Aboo Hurayrah(may Allah be pleased with him): Allah's Messengerﷺ said, "Neither do I give you (anything) nor withhold (anything) from you, but I am just a distributor (i.e.Qaasim), and I give as I am ordered."
.

Commentary : The Prophet ﷺreminded the hearts of his Companions of Allah in all their active and inactive states and clarified to them that he did not do anything apart from the command of Allah.As part of that, he explained to them that Allah, the Glorified, is the one who legislated how the wealth of booty and spoils, and other things be distributed, and clarified the places of their distribution.He ﷺused to say when distributing wealth amongst them, “I do not give to you and withhold from you,” which carries the meaning: I do not give anyone amongst you because of my heart being inclined to him, neither do I withhold from giving anyone due to my heart’s disinterest from him, rather, everything is from Allah, the Exalted. In reality, Allah is the Giver and Withholder.I only give you according to what Allah facilitates for me and according to what He has legislated.
His statement, “I am a Qaasim (distributor),” carries the meaning:I distribute amongst you by the command of Allah and place everything in terms of withholding and giving where I have been commanded to.I do not give anyone or withhold from anyone except by the permission of Allah. Hence, whom I gave little, that was by the decree of Allah, and whom I gave more, that was also by the decree of Allah.
From the benefits of this hadeeth is that it establishes the divine decree and predestination, and belief in that and that there is no one to impede what Allah has given, and there is no giver for what Allah withholds. It sends the message thatpeople deal in the wealth rightly and wrongly, depending on their intentions, while the distribution among the people as per the way of the Messenger of Allah ﷺis done by what Allah divinely decided and by His decree and legal command.
This hadeethis a message to every distributor after the Prophet ﷺ to act like the Prophetﷺ such that he distributes the wealth according to the command of Allah, and not according to desires and other interests.
It shows that sustenance and wealth are a trust from Allah, entrusted to the people..

3118
Narrated Khawla Al-Ansaariyyah (may Allah be pleased with her): I heard Allah's Messengerﷺsaying, "Some people spend Allah's wealth in an unjust manner; such people will be put in the Hellfire on the Day of Resurrection."
.

Commentary : Allah, the Sublime, has made wealth a means for the people by which the interests of their religion and worldly livesare fulfilled.One is meant to earn his income from lawful sources and spend it in a lawful manner.
In this hadeeth, the Prophet ﷺ warned the Zakat collectors and other workersagainst managing the wealth of Allah that they are entrusted with wrongfully. This is applicable to all aspects of wealth, including itsaccumulation, earning through forbidden means, and spending it in the wrong places. The attribution of wealth to Allah is intended to refer tothe war spoils and booty and the public treasuries of Muslims, which Allah made for their interests. This warning is addressing the Zakat collectors, as well as the rulers who take from it wrongfully, thus taking more than what they deserve in comparison to their official duties, giving to those who are not deserving, or something else which is deemed wrong.The Prophet ﷺsaid that these people deserve the Fire on the Day of Judgement, unless they repent, thus returning the wrongfully usurped wealth to their rightful owners.His statement, “For them is …” is indicative of swift punishment and its intense closeness to those who wrongfully deal with the [public] wealth.
This hadeeth clarifies that public wealth that is made to serve the public interests of Muslimsis not a grazing ground for those whom Allah has entrusted with leadership over it because they will be held accountable about it on the Day of Judgment.
The hadeeth contains a deterrent to government officials and leaders from taking from the wealth of Allah anything wrongfully or withholding it from its rightful owners..

3121
Narrated Aboo Hurayrah (may Allah be pleased with him): Allah's Messengerﷺsaid, "When Kosrae is ruined, there will be noKosrae after him; and when Caesar is ruined, there will will be no Caesar after him. By Him in Whose Hands my life is, you will spend their treasures in Allah's Cause."
.

Commentary : This hadeeth contains a sign among the signs of the truthfulness of hisﷺ prophethood.The Prophetﷺ informed his Companions that no king wouldassume the leadership of the Persians after the death of Kosrae in Iraq.It has been said that this meant in other lands that were under the control of the Persians.Likewise, he stated that Hercules, the Caesar of Rome during that time, would be the last of the kings of the Romans in the Levant.Kosrae is the title of every king who ruled the Persians, and Caesar is the title of every king that ruled the Romans.What the Prophet ﷺforetoldhad already happened,i.e.the kingdom of Kosrae was torn apart after his death; likewise, the kingdom of Hercules.It went into retreat after his death until Allah granted the Muslims victory over their lands and the Muslims spent their treasures in the path of Allah, just as the Prophet ﷺ promised them, and upon which he ﷺ took an oath.
The context of this hadeeth is that the people of Quraysh used to go to the Levant and Iraq as traders.When they entered Islam, they feared the prevention of these journeys due to their entrance into Islam.In response, the Prophet ﷺmentioned to them this news tocalm them down and console their hearts, as it was a glad tiding to them that those kingdoms would vanish from those two vast territories.
This hadeeth may appear problematic knowing that when Kosrae died, his son became the king and thereafter a group took control, and the same happened with the Caesar. However, the fact that removes this problematic understanding is that both the Kosrae and Caesar ruled over a stable kingdom.When both vanished, their kingdom entered a state of instability and kept on moving towards destruction and extinction, and it was not their equivalents who assumed power.This is the same stating about a sick person that he is dead.It means that he is close to death and his circumstances are leading to it.
Allah encircled the kingdoms of the Persians and Romans after these kingdoms ruled a vast amount of lands before the advent of Islam.When Allah sent his Prophetﷺ with Islam, the words of the Almighty were realised concerning them: {Indeed, the earth belongs to Allah, he causes to inherit it whom He wills of His servants, and the [best] outcome is for the righteous.}[Quran 7: 128]..

3124
Narrated Aboo Hurayrah:The Prophetﷺ said, "One of Allah’sProphets carried out a military expedition.He said to his followers, 'Anyone who has married a woman and wants to consummate the marriage, and has not done so yet, should not accompany me; nor should a man who has built a house but has not completed its roof; nor a man who has sheep or she-camels and is waiting for the birth of their young ones.' So, the prophet carried out the expedition and when he reached that town at the time or nearly at the time of the `Asr prayer, he said to the sun, 'O sun! You are under Allah's Order, and I am under Allah's Order O Allah! Stop it (i.e. the sun) from setting.' It was stopped till Allah made him victorious. Then he collected the booty, and the fire came to burn it, but it did not burn it. He said (to his men), 'Some of you have stolen something from the booty. Let one man from every tribe give me a pledge of allegiance by shaking hands with me.' (They did so and) the hand of a man got stuck over the hand of their prophet. Thereupon, the prophet said (to the man), 'The theft has been committed by your people. So, all the persons of your tribe should give me the pledge of allegiance by shaking hands with me.' The hands of two or three men got stuck over the hand of their prophet and he said, "You have committed the theft.' Then they brought a head of gold like the head of a cow and put it there, and the fire came and consumed the booty. The Prophetﷺadded: Then Allah saw our weakness and disability, so he made booty permissible for us to have."
.

Commentary : Allah, the Sublime, singled out every nation with its own legislations and injunctions and supported every prophet with miracles that were compatible with their era and that enforced their prophethood. He specifically granted the nation of Prophet Muhammad ﷺmany favours in relation to their legislations and injunctions compared to other previous nations.
In this hadeeth, the Prophet ﷺrelates to usthe story of one of the previous prophets. It has been saiditwas Yoosha’ ibn Noon (peace be upon him), as mentioned by al-Haakim in al-Mustadrak.The Prophetﷺ related that this Prophet (peace be upon him) had set out to invade the city of Jericho in Palestine.However, he demanded that three kinds of men not partake in this war:
First,a man who entered a marital contract with a woman and became able to have sexual intercourse with her but did not have intercourse with her yet would mean his heart is most likely attached to her;therefore, his mind would be occupied with his wife and distracted fromfighting and obedience. Additionally, intercourse wouldlessen his strength.
Second,a man who built a house and did not yet put up its roof,i.e. he did not complete the construction of his houseorlive in it yet.
Third,a man who bought pregnant sheep or camels which had not yet given birth.
The apparent reason he excluded them from going out with him to war wasthattheir hearts would have been attached, and their minds occupied thinking of how to complete the unfinished business they had left behind. As such, they could have become distracted from the war.
On their way, they approached the village at the late afternoon (‘Asr) prayer, or close to that time. The fighting was on a Friday, and there remained a remnant of the disbelievers fighting.It was almost sunset, and the nightfall before Saturday was almost entering. Yoosha’ (peace be upon him) feared that they (his soldiers) would lose the morale to fight because it was not permissible for them to fight during Saturdays.So, he addressed the sun and said to it, “You are commanded” to set, whereas “I am commanded” to fight, so he called on Allah Almighty to restrain the sun, so it would not setuntil they had finished fighting.Allah answered his prayer, and it was stopped,i.e. it was returned backwards, or it stopped, or its movement slowed down until Allah helped them to conquer the village.Then he collected the spoils -the wealth obtained by the Muslims after subjugating the disbelievers in battle. At that time, Allah would send the fire to the acquired booty,so that the fire would devour it. However, it did not devour it, as the devouring by fire of the booty and its burning were a sign of acceptance and non-occurrence of embezzlement.After seeing this, their prophet said to them, “There is embezzlement amongst you.” Embezzlement entails taking the spoils wrongfully; it is a betrayal.For the Prophet, peace be upon him, to discover who had embezzled and stolen the spoils, he requested that from each tribe aselected man of them take an oath of allegiance, by greeting him with his hand, so that he would know in which tribe among them the theft had occurred. When they taking the oaths of allegiance, a man’s hand got stuck with his hand, and this was a sign of a betrayal that had occurred from this tribe.He informed him that embezzlement had occurred within this tribe, and thus he told him, “Let your tribe take an oath of allegiance to me,” individually.While they were pledging allegiance to him, the hands of two or three individuals stuck to his, thus he, peace be upon him, remarked, “Embezzlement is found in you,” meaning, ‘You embezzled the booty.’Hence, he demanded that they return what they had taken, “So, they came with a head like the head of a cow made of gold,” which they had taken out of the spoils, “And they placed it” with the rest of the spoils offered for burning. “Thereafter, a fire came and devoured it [the booty]” because now it had become a complete booty that was free of embezzlement, hence, Allah, the Glorified, accepted it.
After completing the story, the Prophet ﷺsaid that Allah Almighty singled out his nation by making lawful for them the spoils; due to their inability and weakness, as a mercy to them, and due to the honour of our Prophet ﷺ, while He, the Glorified, did not make it lawful for anyone else who was before them.People may end up fighting only for the spoils, due to a lack of sincerity, but within this Muslim Nation, there is a prevalence of sincerity.
In the prophetic expression “for us” is glorification, as the Prophet ﷺincluded his honourable soul with those of his nation; while in his saying, “Allah saw our inability and our weakness,” there is an indication of our reality in the sight of Allah as possessing inability and weakness before Him, the Exalted.
Among other benefits of this hadeeth, we can also conclude that the trials of this world call the soul towards panic, love for survival and fear of death..

3129
Narrated `Abdullah ibn Al-Zubayr:When Al-Zubayr got up during the Battle of the Camel, he called me and I stood up beside him, and he said to me, "O my son! Today one will be killed either as an oppressor or as an oppressed one. I see that I will be killed as an oppressed one. My biggest worry is my debts. Do you think, if we pay the debts, there will be something left for us from our money?" Al-Zubayr added, "O my son! Sell our property and pay my debts." Al-Zubayr then willed one-third of his property and willed one-third of that portion to his sons; namely, `Abdullah's sons. He said, "One-third of the one third. If any property is left after the payment of the debts, one-third (of the one-third of what is left) is to be given to your sons." (Hishaam, a sub-narrator added, "Some of the sons of `Abdullah were equal in age to the sons of Al-Zubayr e.g. Khubayb and `Abbaad. `Abdullah had nine sons and nine daughters at that time." (The narrator `Abdullah added:) My father (Al-Zubayr) went on drawing my attention to his debts saying, "If you should fail to pay part of the debts, appeal to my Master to help you." By Allah! I could not understand what he meant till I asked, "O father! Who is your Master?" He replied, "Allah (is my Master)." By Allah, whenever I had any difficulty regarding his debts, I would say, "O Master of Al-Zubayr! Pay his debts on his behalf ." and Allah would (help me to) pay it. Al-Zubayr was martyred leaving no Dinar or Dirham but two pieces of land, one of which was (called) Al-Ghaabah, and eleven houses in Al-Madeenah, two in the city of al-Basrah, one in the city of Koofah and one in Egypt. In fact, the source of the debt which he owed was, that if somebody brought some money to deposit with him. Al-Zubayr would say, "No, (I won't keep it as a trust), but I take it as a debt, for I am afraid it might be lost." Al-Zubayr was never appointed governor or collector of the tax of Kharaaj or any other similar job, but he collected his wealth (from the war booty he gained) during the battles he took part in, in the company of the Prophetﷺ, Aboo Bakr, `Umar, and `Uthmaan(may Allah be pleased with them). (`Abdullah ibn Al-Zubayr added:) When I counted his debt, it turned to be two million and two hundred thousand. (The sub-narrator added:) Hakeem ibn Hizaam met `Abdullah ibn Zubayr and asked, "O my nephew! How much is the debt of my brother?" `Abdullah kept it as a secret and said, "One hundred thousand," Hakeem said, "By Allah! I do not think your property will cover it." On that `Abdullah said to him, "What if it is two million and two hundred thousand?" Hakeem said, "I do not think you can pay it; so if you are unable to pay all of it, I will help you." Az- Zubayr had already bought Al-Ghaabah for one hundred and seventy thousand. `Abdullah sold it for one million and six hundred thousand. Then he called the people saying, "Any person who has any money claim on Al-Zubayr should come to us in Al-Ghaabah." There came to him `Abdullah ibn Ja`far whom Al-Zubayr owed four hundred thousand. He said to `Abdullah ibn Al-Zubayr, "If you wish I will forgive you the debt." `Abdullah (ibn Al-Zubayr) said, "No." Then Ibn Ja`far said, "If you wish you can defer the payment if you should defer the payment of any debt." Ibn Al-Zubayr said, "No." `Abdullah ibn Ja`far said, "Give me a piece of the land." `Abdullah ibn Al-Zubayr said (to him), "Yours is the land extending from this place to this place." So, `Abdullah ibn Al-Zubayr sold some of the property (including the houses) and paid his debt perfectly, retaining four and a half shares from the land (i.e. Al-Ghaabah). He then went to Mu'aawiyyah while `Amr ibn `Uthmaan, Al-Munthir ibn Az- Zubayr and Ibn Zam`ah were sitting with him. Mu'aawiyyah asked, "At what price have you appraised Al- Ghaabah?" He said, "One hundred thousand for each share," Mu’aawiyyah asked, "How many shares have been left?" `Abdullah replied, "Four and a half shares." Al-Munthir ibn Al-Zubayr said, "I would like to buy one share for one hundred thousand." `Amr ibn `Uthmaan said, "I would like to buy one share for one hundred thousand." Ibn Zam`ah said, "I would like to buy one share for one hundred thousand." Mu’aawiyyah said, "How much is left now?" `Abdullah replied, "One share and a half." Mu’aawiyyah said, "I would like to buy it for one hundred and fifty thousand." `Abdullah also sold his part to Mu’aawiyyah six hundred thousand. When Ibn Al-Zubayr had paid all the debts. Al-Zubayr's sons said to him, "Distribute our inheritance among us." He said, "No, by Allah, I will not distribute it among you till I announce in four successive Hajj seasons, 'Would those who have money claims on Al-Zubayr come so that we may pay them their debt." So, he started to announce that in public in every Hajj season, and when four years had elapsed, he distributed the inheritance among the inheritors. Al-Zubayr had four wives, and after the one-third of his property was excluded (according to the will), each of his wives received one million and two hundred thousand. The total amount of his property was fifty million and two hundred thousand..

Commentary : The Companions(may Allah be pleased with them)would always put their trust in Allah as He ought to be relied upon in all aspects of their lives, and this was evident in their submitting of their affairs to Allah Almighty and not fearing poverty.They would take from the world what Allah had decreed for them with a contented soul without squabbling over it, and there was a blessing in their lives.
In this hadeeth, Abdullah ibnAl-Zubayr reports a conversation that occurred between him and his father, when Al-Zubayribn al-’Awwaam(may Allah be pleased with him) took his position during the Battle of the Camel (whichconsisted ofAl-Zubayribn al-’Awwaam and Talhah ibn ‘Ubaydullah(may Allah be pleased with them)and those who were with them on one side, while ‘Alee ibn Abee Taalib (may Allah be pleased with him)and his companions were on the other;it occurred at the gate of Basra 36 years after the murder of ‘Uthmaan (may Allah be pleased with him)).Al-Zubayribn Al-‘Awwaam called his son ‘Abdullahand told him that either an oppressor or an oppressed would be killed that day in battle. He said that because both parties were acting upon their respective interpretations, he told him that he thought he would be killed that day unjustly.Perhaps that was because he did not intend to fight. He wanted to instruct his son to pay off his debts, and he informed him that the greatest of his concern was these debts.He thought that his debts would not leave anything of his wealth. His concern was valid because his debt was solarge that he feared it might not be repaid. For that reason, he asked ‘Abdullah to sell his assets and property andthereby pay off his debts.Then, he bequeathed one-third of his wealth in absolute terms, then a third of one-third to the sons of ‘Abdullah ibnAl-Zubayr specifically.The sons of ‘Abdullah ibn Al-Zubayr were of the same age as the children of Al-Zubayr, buthe singled out Abdullah's children alone because they increased in number.Khubayb and ‘Abbaad were the two sons of ‘Abdullah ibnAl-Zubayr, and there were no other children besides them in those days;at the same time,Al-Zubayr had nine boys and nine girls on the day of his bequest.Al-Zubayr began instructing his son ‘Abdullah to pay off his debts first by saying, “My son, if you should fail to pay part of the debts, appeal to my Master to help you.”‘Abdullah did not know what Al-Zubayr meant by his master, so he asked him, “My dear father! Who is your master?” He replied, “Allah.”This statement emanates from his complete submission to Allah and reliance on Him, and having trust in Him, the Glorified. He was his Master, his Helper, and his Assister in his life and after his death. As such, ‘Abdullah ibnAl-Zubayr swore by Allah that whenever he fell into distress whilst repaying the debts, he sought Allah’s help and said: “O Master of Al-Zubayr, repay for him his debts,” and He would pay off his debts, meaning Allah, in positive response to his supplication.
What Al-Zubayr expected happened.He was killed in this battle, but he died while he had not left behind any dinar or dirham, rather he had left two lands, one of which was al-Ghaabah, a vast area of land in hilly areas of al-Madeenah, eleven houses in al-Madeenah, two houses in al-Basrah, a house in al-Koofah, and a house in Egypt, and these estates were sold to pay off Al-Zubayr's debts.
‘Abdullah ibnAl-Zubayr mentions the cause of his father's debts.He recalled that a man would come to him with his wealth and would give it to him for safe-keeping and as a trust kept with him.But Al-Zubayr would say, “I will not accept it as a deposit; instead, I will take it as a liable loan,”in case he were to lose it, as this would grant more confidence to the owner of the wealth, and better protect the chivalry of Al-Zubayr(may Allah be pleased with him).
Then, ‘Abdullah went on to mention the source of his father's wealth.Al-Zubayr(may Allah be pleased with him) never became a ruler, nor did he collect taxes, or anything that would be a reason for collecting money.He meant by this to explain that the large amount of his wealth was not attained from thosesources concerning which people are perceived negatively. He clarified that most of the wealth that he acquired was from his share in thewar spoils that he gathered after every battle in which accompanied the Prophet ﷺ, or partook with Aboo Bakr, ‘Umar, and ‘Uthmaan, (may Allah be pleased with them). In other words, the source of his wealth was from war spoils and booty, and what the Prophet ﷺ had bestowed upon him.Thus, Allah granted him blessing in his wealth due to its good origin.
Afterward, his son ‘Abdullah counted what he owed of debt and found it to be two thousand multiplied by a thousand and two hundred thousand, meaning: two million and two hundred thousand dirhams. Hakeem ibn Hizaam met ‘Abdullah ibnAl-Zubayr and asked him, “How much debt does your father owe?”He concealed the total amount of the debt from him, and he replied that the debt was one hundred thousand; he did not lie in his words, as it does not negate an excess of the hundred [thousand].He was truthful in some, while he concealed the other amount. It was said: He only said to him: “One hundred thousand” and concealed the rest, lest Hakeem ibn Hizaam would think negativelyabout Al-Zubayr due to the large amount hehad borrowed, or thinkhe lacked firmness, orthat ‘Abdullah would fail to repay the debt. In these ways he could end up perceivingthat he was a person in need. However, Hakeem said, “By Allah, I do not perceive that your wealth will be enough for this debt.”So ‘Abdullah revealed the full amount to him, saying, “Tell me what you think if the debt amountedto two million and two hundred thousand.” When ‘Abdullah saw that Hakeem had perceived the issue of one hundred thousand to be a huge amount, he was compelled to disclose to him of all the debts, and let him know that he was able to repay them. However, Hakeem replied, “I do not see you all being able to repay this amount, so if you cannot handle part of it, then feel free to request assistance from me.”
 ‘Abdullah managed to sell al-Ghaabah for one million and six hundred thousand dirhams. So he proclaimed among the people, “If anyone has a financial right due on Al-Zubayr, then let him come to us at al-Ghaabah.”‘Abdullah ibn Ja’far ibn Abee Taalib(may Allah be pleased with him) came to him as he had lent four hundred thousand to Al-Zubayr, and he said to Abdullah ibn al-Al-Zubayr, “If you wish, I can forsake the claim in support of you out of generosity and grace, so I will not claim back my debt.” ‘Abdullah ibn Al-Zubayr replied, “Do not forsake your debt.” Ibn Ja’far said, “If you wish, you can place it with that amount that you will repay later, if you are going to delay the repayments.”He was suggesting to be placedat the end of the list of people who were due repayment.‘Abdullah replied, “Do not suggest delays.” Ibn Ja’far answered, “In that case, cut for me a portion of the land to repay my debt.”Ibn Al-Zubayr estimated perfectly for him the land, and he sold part of al-Ghaabah and some houses that were not part of al-Ghaabah, and he was able to repay his father’s debt.
He repaid him in full, and there were four and half portions left unsold of al-Ghaabah.Afterwards, ‘Abdullah ibn al-Zubayr came to Mu’aawiyah ibn Abee Sufyaan in Damascus.‘Amr ibn ‘Uthmaan ibn ‘Affaan, his brother al-Munthiribn al-Zubayr ibn al-‘Awwaam, and Ibn Zam’ah were with him.Mu’aawiyah asked, “At how much was al-Ghaabah estimated?”He answered him, “Every portion out of the original sixteen portions was estimated at one hundred thousand.”He asked, “How many portions are left?”He answered, “Four and half portions.”Al-Munthir ibn al-Zubayr said, “I have bought one portion for one hundred thousand.”‘Amr ibn ‘Uthmaan said, “I have taken one portion for one hundred thousand.” Ibn Zam’ah said, “I have bought a portion for one hundred thousand.”Then Mu’aawiyah asked, “Now how much is left?”He answered, “One and half portions.”He said, “I have taken it for one hundred and fifty thousand.”After every creditor had received his financial due, ‘Abdullah ibn Ja’far sold his share to Mu’aawiyah for six hundred thousand, making a profit of two hundred thousand.
Once Ibn al-Zubayr had completed repaying the debts of his father, the children of al-Zubayr told him, “Now, divide between us our inheritance.”However, ‘Abdullah said, “By Allah, I will not distribute the inheritance between you yet, until I proclaim during the Hajj season for four years,“Attention everyone!If anyone is owed by al-Zubayr any money, let him come to us, we will repay his debt.”This does not entail stopping the rightful inheritor from getting his right,which is the distributed portion and the ability to transact in his portion.That is because ‘Abdullah ibn al-Zubayr was a custodian of the estates of al-Zubayr, and he dealt with what was in the interests of paying off the debts first.He assumed that there was a possibility of having remaining debts, whereas distribution to the inheritors only happens after paying off all debts due on the deceased.
The reason he singled out the proclamation for the period of four years is that most likely the distance between Makkah and other distant lands can be travelled during that period in two years, and he intended for the news to reach all parts of the territory and return to him, so he could thereby be assured that he had absolved himself from the responsibility of his father.
He kept on proclaiming every year during the Hajj season, when people from all the corners of the Islamic State assemble, “Attention everyone!Whoever is owed by al-Zubayr anything, please come to us and we will pay off what he is owed.”When four years passed, he distributed the inheritance between them.Al-Zubayr had four wives when he died; they were, Umm Khaalid, al-Rabaab, Zaynab, and ‘Aatikah bint Zayd. ‘Abdullah removed the third portion of the remaining bequeathed wealth which al-Zubayr had bequeathed for the poor people.Every wife got one million two hundred thousand. The total of his remaining wealth was five million and two hundred thousand.
This hadeeth shows that it was among the guidance of the Companions (may Allah be pleased with them) to bequeath at times of war, and to bequeath for the grandsons if there are those inheritors who would legally prevent the inheritance from reaching them.
It also shows that it is permissible to delay the distribution of inheritance until all the debts of the deceased are repaid and his bequests are fully executed.
The hadeeth shows that it is part of the guidance of the Companions(may Allah be pleased with them) for the inheritor as well as the executor [if he wishes] to buy from the left-behind estates if theyare sold.
Italso shows the generosity of ‘Abdullah ibn Ja’far, hence, he was known as the ‘sea of generosity’ and it expounds the virtue and grace of both Ja’far and Hakeem ibn Hizaam.
The hadeeth contains a prohibition from being in debt for the one who cannot repay it or wouldspend it wrongly.
It was part of the guidance of the Companions to proclaim concerning the debts of the one known to have taken loans, and that the proclamation should occur during important seasons, as they are the main assemblies of the people.
The hadeeth motivates and inspires us to have firm trust in and reliance on Allah, the Mighty and Majestic.
It also expounds the blessings of Allah, the Glorified, for the holy warrior and the one striving in His path in his wealth during his lifetime and death..

3134
Narrated Ibn `Umar (may Allah be pleased with him): Allah's Messengerﷺsent a militant mission (Sariyyah)towards Najd - and `Abdullah ibn `Umar was in this expedition. They gained a great number of camels as war booty. The share of each one of them was twelve or eleven camels, and they were given an extra camel each..

Commentary : The spoils of war arecounted and then distributed among the soldiers who have participated in the fight. The person who has the authority to distribute the spoils is the commander of the militaryoperation or the one whom hedelegates for this responsibility.
In this hadeeth, ‘Abdullah ibn ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him) narrates that the Prophet ﷺ sent an expeditiontowards Najd, which is a regionlocated in the middle of the Arabian Peninsula. This expedition is referred to in the hadeeth as Sariyyah, which is a division from the army that consists of no more than four hundred fighters, and ‘Abdullah ibn ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him) was a participant in this one.He reports that they acquired many camels and that the share of each one of them was eleven or twelve camels.The commander of the army gave everyone amongst them their share and granted them an extra camel from the spoils before their division. In a narration in Saheeh Muslim, it reads, “The Messenger of Allah gave us each an extra camel.”This extra share is called in Arabic Anfaal, and they are gifts from the spoils other than the share that is due to be divided so that he gave each one an extra amount above his share.That is because they did well in their fight; giving an additional amount is only for the one who does well in the war.
The reconciliation of the meaning between the two narrations - where in one it says the commander of the expedition was the one who gave them an extra reward from the spoils, and in the other that the Prophet ﷺ was the one who gave them above their allocated share - is that the commander of the expedition gave an extra reward from the spoils, while the Messenger of Allah ﷺ permitted him to so; thus it is allowed to attribute this act to each one of them in that respect.
Frome the benefits of this hadeeth is learning that ifa division from the army acquires spoils during the time it was separated from the army, then the acquired spoils are to be shared with the rest of the army.However, if it encamps in one town while the rest of the army is stationed in a different town, then it exclusively receives the spoils without sharing it with them.
This hadeeth establishesthe legitimacy of giving extra rewards from the spoils in order to motivate the fighters to do well in war..

3135
Narrated Ibn `Umar(may Allah be pleased with him): Allah's Messengerﷺused to give an extra share to some of the members of the Sariyyah he used to send, in addition to the shares they shared with the army in general.
.

Commentary : An-Nafl is the name given to the additional amount the ruler gives to some soldiers above the share of spoils they are entitled to receive, based on obtaining an interest that he perceives.
In this hadeeth, ‘Abdullah ibn ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him) reports that the Prophet ﷺ used to send a Sariyyah – which is a division of the army that does not exceed four hundred in number - and he ﷺ used to give to some of the soldiers of these military units gifts that were exclusive for them, besides the spoils that were distributed to the whole army in general. They would obtain their common share and the specifically rewarded additional share from the Messenger of Allah ﷺ.This was for wisdom and different reasons, such as if a man was particularly offensive against the enemy, or he ascended a fortress and opened it to the Muslims until they overtook it, or he attacked the leader of the enemy’s army and killed him, thus managing thereby to defeat the enemy.The Righteous Caliphs used to do that as well.It was said that he ﷺ used to give the Nafl from the Khums (one-fifth of the entire booty).
This hadeeth shows that it is permissible to take into account the people of power and strength in war and to exclusively allocate them a gift in excess of others..

3136
Narrated Aboo Moosa (may Allah be pleased with him): We got the news of the migration of the Prophetﷺwhile we were in Yemen, so we set out migrating to him. We were, I and my two brothers, I being the youngest, and one of my brothers was Aboo Burdah and the other was Aboo Ruhm. We were over fifty (or fifty-three or fifty -two) men from our people. We got on board a ship which took us to the Negus ofAbyssinia, and there we found Ja`far ibn Abee Taalib and his companions with al-Najaaishee. Ja`far said (to us), "Allah's Messengerﷺhas sent us here and ordered us to stay here, so you too, stay with us." We stayed with him till we all left (Ethiopia) and met the Prophetﷺat the time when he had conquered Khaybar. He gave us a share from its booty (or gave us from its booty). He gave only to those who had taken part in the Battle with him. but he did not give any share to any person who had not participated in Khaybar's conquest except the people of our ship, besides Ja`far and his companions, whom he gave a share as he did them (i.e. the people of the ship).
.

Commentary : The Prophet ﷺ had ordered some of his Companions to migrate to Abyssinia to escape in the interest of their religion and lives from the harm of the polytheists in Makkah. He ﷺ chose Abyssinia as a place to migrate to because its king, the Negus, was a just man, and among those who emigrated to it was Ja’far Ibn Abee Taalib (may Allah be pleased with him).That was before Allah ordered the Muslims to emigrate to al-Madeenah.
In this hadeeth, Aboo Moosaa al-Ash’aree (may Allah be pleased with him) reports that while he was in Yemen, he heard about the mission and migration of the Prophet ﷺ to al-Madeenah. He and others wanted to migrate to him in al-Madeenah, that is, he and his brothers Aboo Ruhm and Aboo Burdah, and with them, there were another fifty-two or fifty-three men from their people who had already reverted to Islam.When they boarded the ship from Yemen to reach Makkah, they were dropped off at Abyssinia, where they met Ja’far ibn Abee Taalib (may Allah be pleased with him) and those who were with him among the Muslim immigrants. They remained with them there until they all came to al-Madeenahafter the conquest of Khaybar in the seventh year of the migration.Khaybar was a town inhabited by Jews at a distance of 153 km from al-Madeenah.I was located to the north on the road to the Levant (al-Shaam).When they came, the Prophet ﷺ allocated for them their shares and gave them a portion of the booty acquired from the conquest of Khaybar. That was after he consulted with the campaigning Muslims concerning them, and they agreed, as the narration of al-Bayhaqee portrays.He did not grant anyone who had not witnessed the invasionanything except the passengers of the ship, namely Ja’far ibn Abee Taalib (may Allah be pleased with him) and those who were with him from among the emigrants from Makkah, and Aboo Moosa al-Ash’aree (may Allah be pleased with him) and those who had emigrated with him from amongst his people to Abyssinia.
This hadeeth expounds the merit and status of the early emigrants - such as Ja'far ibn Abee Taalib and Aboo Moosaa al-Ash'aree and those who were with them –and how they enjoyed two emigrations.
It shows that the ruler has the right to dispose of the wealth gained from the spoils and to exclusively allocate a part of it to the deputies of the Muslims and to those who have lost their wealth, as he ﷺgave to the people of the ship.
Itshows the suffering that the early Muslims endured with the Prophet ﷺ until they managed to convey the call of Allah to the people..

1510
Abu Hurayrah (may Allah be pleased with him) reported that the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) said: "No son can repay a father unless he finds him a slave and buys him and emancipates him." Another version reads: "No son can repay his father.".

Commentary : The right that children owe to their parents is great, and being dutiful to them in Islam is among the greatest means of drawing closer to Allah, as Allah has made dutifulness to them one of the broadest ways of reaching Paradise. Allah has also made not obeying them among the major sins and misdeeds that lead their perpetrators to disgracing punishment.
In this Hadīth, the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) clarifies that the child, whether male or female, cannot repay his father - the mother is included and so are the grandparents who are the same as the parents - and fulfill his right in full for his kindness towards him except when he finds his father a slave, buys him with his own money, and emancipates him and sets him free. In other words, the son seeks to reach him by buying him, and it is well known that he only buys him to free him from slavery, not to have him as his own slave or to be the master of his father. So, nothing fulfills the father's right over his son, no matter what the son does, except this act. This is because Islam came when slavery and serfdom were widespread and a common habit of the Arabs, and there were bondmaids and slaves in every house.
It was said: If a man took possession of his father, the latter would be free by mere possession and [there is] no need to say: I set him free. Similarly, if he took possession of his mother, she would be free by mere possession and [there is] no need to say: I set her free.
The Hadīth encourages children to be dutiful and kind to their parents.
It also denotes the merit of emancipating slaves..

1513
Abu Hurayrah reported: The Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) forbade the Hasāh sale (throwing pebble sale) and the Gharar sale (uncertainty sale)..

Commentary : During the pre-Islamic era of ignorance, there prevailed types of transactions that involved massive oppression and injustice. When Islam came, it established fair sales and forbade whatever involved oppression. Hence, it forbade what involved fraud and ambiguity to stop disagreement and dispute among people, which is one of the Shariah-approved objectives.
In this Hadīth, Abu Hurayrah (may Allah be pleased with him) narrates that the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) forbade the Hasāh sale, which was one of the sales practiced by the people of Jāhiliyyah. If the seller or the buyer threw a pebble, that would be a sign of finalizing the sale. It had three forms: First: The seller says to the buyer: I would sell you of these garments that on which the pebble I throw falls; or: I would sell you a piece of this land from here to the part that this pebble reaches. Second: Considering the act of throwing the pebble itself a sale by saying: If you throw the pebble at this garment, it will be sold to you at such-and-such. Third: Saying: You have the option to either accept or reject the sale until I throw this pebble. It was said: It means saying: Throw the pebble and whatever number comes out, I will be entitled to an equal number of dinars or dirhams. All these are forms of invalid sales that entail doing injustice to one of the two parties of the sale.
The Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) also forbade the Gharar sale. Gharar means danger, delusion, and deceit. This is a generalization after a specification, as it includes any sale that involves any kind of deceit, or that which is ambiguous or cannot be fulfilled. One of the rationales behind forbidding this sale is the fact that it is a waste of money, for one may not be able to get the sold item, which means that he spent his money in vain.
The Hadīth prohibits deception and fraud in sales.
It warns against consuming people's properties wrongfully.
It also points out that the object of a sale transaction must be something known and must have a known price..

1519
Abu Hurayrah (may Allah be pleased with him) reported that the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) said: Do not go out to meet what is being brought for trade. Whoever goes out to meet it and buys something thereof, when its master comes to the market, he will have the option..

Commentary : Selling and buying have rulings and etiquettes in Islam that a Muslim must adhere to fulfill justice in transactions and enjoy the pleasures of this worldly life and the Hereafter.
In this Hadīth, the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) forbids merchants from going out and receiving those people who transport commodities from one country to another. They must not receive them before arriving and being acquainted with the prices of commodities in such a country because this might harm the seller as they might buy from him at a lower price than its known price, which would result in harming the owner of the commodity by underestimating its price. Hence, the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) commanded the one who goes out to meet it and buys something thereof, and does not comply with the prohibition. So when "its master," i.e., the owner of the commodity, comes to the market, he will have the option either to effect the sale or take back his goods, for perhaps he did him injustice and wronged him regarding its price compared to its price in this country.
The Hadīth encourages truthfulness and transparency and the avoidance of deceit in commercial transactions.
It shows the Prophet's keenness on whatever brings goodness to his Ummah and his kindness towards them even when it comes to worldly interests..

1525
Ibn ‘Abbās reported that the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) said: Whoever buys food should not sell it until he measures it. I said to Ibn ‘Abbās: Why? He said: Do you not see them transacting with gold, whereas the food is deferred?.

Commentary : Allah Almighty has prescribed in sale what maintains people's rights, keeps them away from conflicts and quarrels, and repels harm from them.
In this Hadīth, the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) advises us saying that whoever buys food and wants to resell it, he "should not sell it" until he takes it after being measured and weighed. This is an indirect reference that the buyer should receive it and it becomes in his possession and knows its amount in a way that negates ambiguity. This is related to what is sold by measure as in this case, so it must be first measured until he receives it in full, then, he may sell it afterward. It is not lawful for him to sell it before measuring it, as it could be subject to excess or deficiency, which entails doing injustice and harm either to the seller or the buyer. Thereupon, Tāwūs ibn Kaysān - from the Tābi‘is - asked Ibn ‘Abbās (may Allah be pleased with him and his father): "Why?" i.e., why did the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) stipulate this condition? Ibn ‘Abbās (may Allah be pleased with him and his father) said: "Do you not see them transacting with gold, whereas the food is deferred?" In other words, the seller used to take the price in gold dinars, and then he would delay the delivery of food to the buyer. Therefore, the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) stipulated that the buyer should not resell it until he receives it and it becomes in his possession. Another Hadīth in the two Sahīh Collections clarified that what he meant by that is to transfer the food to another place or to the markets where it is sold in order not to be monopolized or manipulate its price. So, he made it clear that the right thing is to transfer it to the markets, which are known to people, where food is sold and to take possession of it, since Qabd (taking possession) is a condition, and transferring it as mentioned fulfills this condition.
Moreover, in the two Sahīh Collections, the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) forbade reselling the food after buying it until he receives it in full, i.e., he should not adopt any procedure or dispose of it by selling it again unless he first takes what he has purchased and it becomes in his full possession. Only then, he can resell it. This guarantees preventing any harm to the seller, the buyer, or the dwellers of this country that could result in disputes and conflicts between people and, thus, inflict harm upon them.
The Hadīth shows the Prophet's keenness on whatever brings goodness to his Ummah and his kindness towards them even when it comes to worldly interests.
It highlights the prohibition of adopting sale methods that lead to the monopoly of goods and the rise in prices, or that cause harm to the parties involved in the sale transaction..

1530
Jābir ibn ‘Abdullāh reported: The Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) forbade selling a heap of dried dates, whose measure is unknown, for a specified amount of dried dates..

Commentary : The rulings of sale transactions in Islam revolve around honesty and the absence of uncertainty among the parties involved in the sale. The sold item must be known to both parties, in terms of type, quantity, and quality, in such a way that removes any ambiguity. The Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) forbade certain kinds of sales that involve Jahālah (ambiguity), Gharar (uncertainty), and Riba (usury).
This Hadīth clarifies some of these forbidden kinds of sales. Jābir ibn ‘Abdullah (may Allah be pleased with him and his father) narrates that the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him): "Forbade selling a heap of dried dates, whose measure is unknown," "Subrah" (heap): food that is collected in a pile and whose weight and quantity are unknown. This applies to all types of food; however, he mentioned here one type in particular, namely the dried dates, because it is their staple food; otherwise, the mentioned prohibition includes all types of measured food. In Muslim's version, he did not mention his saying: "of dried dates" at the end of the Hadīth, which indicates the inclusion of all types of food sold without knowing its amount in exchange for a known amount of its like. "For a specified amount of dried dates," i.e., he forbade selling an unknown amount for a known amount of the same type, like dried dates for dried dates, wheat for wheat, and barley for barley, as this involves ambiguity regarding the unmeasured food from one aspect besides involving Riba al-Fadl (usury of surplus) from another aspect, bearing in mind that ignorance about the equality between the sold and purchased items is like knowing that there is a surplus between them, which is clear Riba. If the items subject to Riba rulings are the same, then, they must be the same in measure and hand to hand. However, if they are of different types, then, there is nothing wrong with the surplus between them like in the case of selling dried dates for wheat, or barley for corn, and the same applies to selling for cash, gold, or silver.
The Hadīth clarifies how the Shariah regulates the process of selling and buying to avoid the occurrence of disputes..

1536
Jābir reported: The Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) forbade leasing land and selling it ahead for years, and selling fruits before ripening..

Commentary : In the pre-Islamic era of ignorance, there prevailed types of sale that brimmed with oppression and injustice. When Islam came, it established fair sales and forbade everything involving oppression. Hence, it forbade cheating in sale transactions. Putting an end to disputes and conflicts between the seller and the buyer is one of the objectives of the Shariah.
In this Hadīth, Jābir ibn ‘Abdullah (may Allah be pleased with him and his father) reports that the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) forbade "leasing land", which is renting it. The forbidden lease is that which is in return for some of its produce, which means that the rent agreed upon between the owner and the lessee is an amount specified from the beginning of the fruits produced by this land, which may or may not produce this amount. In this case, the one who cultivates it will not be capable of fulfilling his contract. However, there is nothing wrong with leasing land in return for gold, silver, or cash, as in the two Sahīh Collections, Hanzhalah ibn Qays reported: "That he asked Rāfi‘ ibn Khadīj about leasing land, and he said: The Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) forbade leasing land. He said: I said: Even in return for gold and silver? He said: If it is in return for gold and silver, there is no harm in it." Also in the two Sahīh Collections, Ibn ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him and his father) reported: "The Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) agreed with the people of Khaybar to work and cultivate in return for half of the fruits or crops produced." Therefore, the owner is allowed to lease it in return for a standard percentage of what is cultivated therein, like one-fourth or one-third of its produce.
He also forbade "selling it in advance for years." A version of Muslim reads: "Selling fruits in advance for years," which is selling the fruits of trees and palm trees for two years or more, knowing that such fruits have not been created yet. This is a Gharar sale (uncertain sale) because it involves selling something non-existent, ambiguous, undeliverable, and not owned by the contractor. So, it is a sale that involves a great deal of uncertainty and ambiguity.
The Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) also forbade "selling fruits before ripening," i.e., appearing to be ripe when it becomes colorful and its fruit appears and it becomes red or yellow, which is a sign of its good condition and safety from blight, and it becomes suitable for eating and selling.
The Hadīth shows the prohibition of every sale that involves ambiguity..

1536
Jābir ibn ‘Abdullāh reported: The Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) forbade taking of rent or share of land..

Commentary : In the pre-Islamic era of ignorance, there prevailed types of sales that brimmed with oppression and injustice. When Islam came, it established fair sales and forbade whatever involved oppression. Hence, it forbade whatever involved fraud, uncertainty, and ambiguity to put an end to disputes and conflicts among people, which is one of the Shariah-approved objectives.
During the time of the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him), people used to lease their cultivated lands with contracts that either included an ambiguous rent or entailed injustice to the tenant. Hence, the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) forbade taking rent or share of the land to prevent such contracts. The rent or share here means: The rent agreed upon between the owner, and the lessee is an amount specified from the beginning of the fruits produced by this land, and the land may produce this amount and may not, in which case the one who cultivates it will not be capable of fulfilling his contract. Hence, this was forbidden so they would not deceive the other or wrongfully consume his brother's property.
As for leasing in return for gold, silver, or cash, there is nothing wrong with it, as in the two Sahīh Collections - the wording is that of Muslim - Hanzhalah ibn Qays reported: "That he asked Rāfi‘ ibn Khadīj about leasing land, and he said: The Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) forbade leasing land. He said: I said: Even in return for gold and silver? He said: If it is in return for gold and silver, there is no harm in it." Also in the two Sahīh Collections, Ibn ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him and his father) reported: "The Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) agreed with the people of Khaybar to work and cultivate in return for half of the fruits or crops produced." Therefore, the owner is allowed to lease it in return for a standard percentage of what is cultivated therein, like one-fourth or one-third of its produce..

1536
Jābir reported: The Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) forbade the sale of produce several years in advance. Another version reads: Selling fruits years in advance..

Commentary : Islam cares about protecting people's properties and is keen on not wasting them. It has clarified the manner of dealing with fixed assets and cash and how to manage selling and buying in such a way that guarantees the absence of uncertainty between the transactors and the removal of ambiguity from the sold item.
In this Hadīth, Jābir ibn ‘Abdullah (may Allah be pleased with him and his father) narrates that the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) forbade the sale of selling in advance, or selling fruits years in advance, which is selling the fruits of trees and palm trees for two years or more, knowing that such fruits have not been created yet. This is a Gharar sale (a sale of uncertainty) because it involves selling something non-existent, ambiguous, undeliverable, and not owned by the contractor. So, it is a sale that involves a great deal of uncertainty and ambiguity.
One of the rationales behind this prohibition is the waste of money involved as the sold item might not be achieved, and he would have, thus, spent his money in vain.
The Hadīth shows the Prophet's keenness to establish financial relations among people based on sound grounds to protect the rights of all parties involved..

1536
Jābir reported: The Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) forbade selling the white land (uncultivated land) for two or three years..

Commentary : Islam cares about protecting people's property and is keen on not wasting them. It has clarified the manner of dealing with fixed assets and cash and how to manage selling and buying in such a way that guarantees the absence of uncertainty between the transactors and the removal of ambiguity from the sold item.
In this Hadīth, Jābir ibn ‘Abdullah (may Allah be pleased with him and his father) narrates that the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) forbade selling the white land, which is the land that has no trees or plants. What is meant by selling it here is its "Kirā’" (leasing), which means taking a share of the fruits as a rent for the land. It was called "sale" because it refers to selling a benefit. His saying: "Two or three years" indicates that the land may not yield a product during one of the contract years. Hence, its cultivator will need to fulfill his contract. For this reason, the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) made the original state of the land dominant in the contract so that none of them would deceive the other or consume his brother's property wrongfully.
As for leasing in return for gold, silver, or cash, there is nothing wrong with that, for in the two Sahīh Collections - the wording is that of Muslim - Hanzhalah ibn Qays reported: "That he asked Rāfi‘ ibn Khadīj about leasing land, and he said: The Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) forbade leasing land. He said: I said: Even in return for gold and silver? He said: If it is in return for gold and silver, there is no harm with that."
The Prohibition in this Hadīth is from uncertainty in leasing land in return for something ambiguous or not guaranteed of its fruits and how the transaction should be transparent and known to avoid discord and wasting people's properties..

1541
Abu Hurayrah reported: the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) gave a concession for the sale of ‘Arāyā (unpicked ripe dates for dry dates) by estimation when they are less than - or he said: equal to - five Wasqs (a standard measure)..

Commentary : In the pre-Islamic era of ignorance, there were types of Riba-based sales. When Islam came, it rectified and refined such sale transactions and established the fair sale, which is free from Riba (usury). It forbade all types of sales that involve a possibility of Riba and that involve injustice.
In this Hadīth, Abu Hurayrah (may Allah be pleased with him) reports that the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) "gave a concession," i.e., allowed and permitted, "the sale of ‘Arāyā": A type of sale that takes the following form: Buying fresh dates after becoming ripe on the date palms for dry dates. So, the fruits on the date palm are given to the needy to eat therefrom whenever they like. What is on the date palms is estimated and dry dates are taken in exchange. It was called the ‘Arāya sale because the owner of the date palm gives it to a needy person, i.e., he strips it of its fruits for his sake. However, the Shariah set a condition that this should be done "by estimation," i.e., with a similar number of dried dates for the unpicked fruits. This is because some people would witness the season of ripe dates and wish to feed their children therefrom while having no date palms or money. Hence, the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) wanted to show kindness to them. He also stipulated that this should be of a measure or weight less than "five Wasqs", and the "Wasq" is a standard measure that is equal to sixty Sā‘s, i.e. (130.5kg) one hundred thirty kilograms and a half. Therefore, five Wasqs are equal to almost (653kg) six hundred fifty-three kilograms.
This means: The Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) granted them a concession regarding this kind of sale with this amount only because it could be mistakenly thought to be Riba, as the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) forbade selling fruits for fruits of the same type, which is called a Muzābanah sale (selling something definite for an indefinite amount of its kind). It is as if the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) made for them the exception of the ‘Arāya sale from Muzābanah and restricted it to five Wasqs to avoid the possibility of Riba.
His saying: "Or equal to five Wasqs" refers to the doubt that one of the Hadīth narrators had, and he was Dāwūd ibn al-Husayn, as he did not remember whether it was five Wasqs or less than five Wasqs.
The Hadīth clarifies the concession granted regarding one of the sale transactions out of alleviation and facilitation for the Ummah.
It also points out that the specified amount in the ‘Arāya sale transactions is five Wasqs..

1547
Ibn ‘Umar reported: We did not see anything wrong with Khibr until last year when Rāfi‘ claimed that the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) forbade it. [Another version reads]: So, we abandoned it on account of that. [Another version reads]: Rāfi‘ has forbidden us from benefitting from our land..

Commentary : In the pre-Islamic era of ignorance, there prevailed types of sale that brimmed with oppression and injustice. When Islam came, it established fair sales and forbade whatever involved oppression. Hence, it forbade whatever involved fraud, uncertainty, and ambiguity to put an end to disputes and conflicts among people, which is one of the Shariah-approved objectives.
In this Hadīth, ‘Abdullah ibn ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him and his father) reports that they used to see nothing wrong with Khibr, i.e., they used to practice Mukhābarah (sharecropping), which is leasing the land in return for part of its produce, and the seed or sowing part is from the worker (the lessee). Things continued this way until the year preceding that year when Ibn ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him and his father) was narrating this Hadīth. A version of Muslim reads: "Ibn ‘Umar used to rent his farms during the time of the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him), and during the rule of Abu Bakr, ‘Umar, ‘Uthmān, and the early days of Mu‘āwiyah's caliphate until it was conveyed to him at the end of Mu‘āwiyah's caliphate." As Rāfi‘ ibn Khadīj (may Allah be pleased with him) reported that the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) forbade Mukhābarah. Thereupon, Ibn ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him and his father) refrained from Mukhābarah on account of what was narrated by Rāfi‘ (may Allah be pleased with him) from the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him).
In another version, Ibn ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him and his father) said: "Rāfi‘ has, indeed, forbidden us from benefitting from our land," i.e., Rāfi‘ ibn Khadīj (may Allah be pleased with him) forbade us from benefitting from our land through Mukhābarah.
Ibn ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him and his father) did not ask Rafi‘ for details about what was meant by the prohibition. In the two Sahīh Collections, Hanzhalah ibn Qays reported: "That he asked Rāfi‘ ibn Khadīj about leasing land, and he said: The Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) forbade leasing land. He said: I said: Even in return for gold and silver? He said: If it is in return for gold and silver, there is no harm in it." Also in the two Sahīh Collections, Ibn ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him and his father) reported: "The Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) agreed with the people of Khaybar to work and cultivate in return for half of the fruits or crops produced." Therefore, it is permissible for the owner to rent it in return for a standard percentage of what is cultivated therein, like one-fourth or one-third of its produce. The prohibition refers to whatever involves risk, ambiguity, and uncertainty. The most famous among such transactions was where the landowner used to specify for himself part of the land and what it produces..

1547
Hanzhalah ibn Qays al-Ansāri reported: I asked Rāfi‘ ibn Khadīj about leasing land in return for gold and silver, he replied: "There is no harm in it. At the time of the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) the people used to lease lands in return for the yield of what grows on the banks of large rivers and the beginnings of water streams or the yield of certain parts of the land. Some of the harvest would be destroyed and some would remain safe. This was the only system the people had for renting lands, and thus, he forbade it. If the rent is something known and guaranteed, there is no harm in it.".

Commentary : During the pre-Islamic era of ignorance, there prevailed types of transactions that involved massive oppression and injustice. When Islam came, it established fair sales and forbade whatever involved oppression. Hence, it forbade what entailed fraud, uncertainty, and ambiguity to stop discord and dispute among people, which is one of the Shariah-approved objectives. At the time of the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him), people used to lease lands in return for a share of the yield as rent. The Tābi‘i Hanzhalah ibn Qays al-Ansāri asked the Companion Rāfi‘ ibn Khadīj (may Allah be pleased with him) about leasing it, i.e., renting it in return for gold and silver, which are meant here to refer to the dinar and dirham. This is a question about leasing land in return for gold and silver instead of leasing it in return for part of the yield. Rāfi‘ (may Allah be pleased with him) replied that there is no objection to leasing land in return for gold and silver, and he said: "At the time of the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) the people used to lease lands in return for the yield of what grows on the banks of large rivers," which are the watercourses coming from the wide river. It was said: What grows on the banks of the watercourse, and it was said: What grows around the brooklets. "And the beginnings of water streams," which are the beginnings of small rivers, "or the yield of certain parts of the land," i.e., types of the cultivated crops. This means: the owner allocates to himself the parts that would yield the best fruits or the finest crops, and the rest is for the tenant.
Rāfi‘ said: "Some of the harvest would be destroyed and some would remain safe," i.e., either the harvest of the owner or that of the tenant is destroyed, so one of them is wronged. "This was the only system the people had for renting lands, and thus, he forbade it," i.e., the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) prohibited this kind of rent given the Jahālah (ambiguity) that it involved, and Jahālah is Gharar (uncertainty). If the rent, however, is something known and guaranteed, i.e., a known rent in cash, then there is no objection to leasing the land in return for such rent.
The Hadīth points out the permissibility of leasing land in return for a known amount of cash money..

1548
Rāfi‘ ibn Khadīj reported: At the time of the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him), we used to lease land based on Muhāqalah so that we would lease it in return for one-third or one-quarter of the yield or a specified amount of food. One day, a man from among my paternal uncles came and said: The Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) has forbidden us from something beneficial for us, but obedience to Allah and His Messenger is more beneficial for us. He has forbidden us to lease land based on Muhāqalah and to lease it in return for one-third or one-quarter of the yield and for a specified amount of food. He commanded the landowner to cultivate it or to give it to someone else to cultivate. He disliked leasing it or anything else. [Another version reads]: We used to lease land based on Muhāqalah, leasing it in return for one-third or one-quarter of the yield..

Commentary : In the pre-Islamic era of ignorance, there prevailed types of sale that brimmed with oppression and injustice. When Islam came, it established fair sales and forbade whatever involved oppression. Hence, it forbade whatever involved fraud, uncertainty, and ambiguity to end disputes and conflicts among people, which is one of the Shariah-approved objectives.
In this Hadīth, Rāfi‘ ibn Khadīj (may Allah be pleased with him) reports that they used to lease land based on Muhāqalah during the time of the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him). There are different opinions regarding the meaning of Muhāqalah. It is said: It means leasing the land in return for wheat, as interpreted in some versions, which is called Muhārathah by the cultivators. It is said: It means the cultivation of land in return for a known share of its produce, like one-third, one-fourth, or the like as mentioned in this Hadīth. It is said: It means selling food in its ears in return for wheat grains. It is said: It means selling crops before fully growing. His saying: "And for a specified amount of food," i.e., by taking a specified share of the fruits as a rent for the land, and all this entails ambiguity in the contract between the owner and the lessee. Then, Rāfi '(may Allah be pleased with him) reported that things continued in this way until one day, one of his paternal uncles - it is said: His uncle Zhahīr ibn Rāfi '- came and informed them that the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) forbade them from something beneficial for them, referring to Muhāqalah, which was what they obtained in return for using the land so that they would benefit and the worker would benefit as well. However, this benefit, in fact, is a partial benefit, and perhaps it will not be safe from harm, as its fruits might be ruined, which would lead to the loss of the right of one of them. "But obedience to Allah and His Messenger is more beneficial for us," i.e., obeying Allah and His Messenger (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) to what he guides us is more beneficial for us than this assumed benefit of Kirā’ and Muzāra‘ah that we used to practice. In fact, responding to the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) is better and more beneficial for their religion and worldly life. One of their ways of practicing Muhāqalah was leasing land in return for one-third or one-fourth of its yield or a specified amount of food, i.e., by taking a share of the fruits as a rent for the land. So, the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) commanded the landowner to cultivate it himself or give it to someone to cultivate. The Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) disliked "leasing it or anything else," i.e., anything related to leasing. It is said: This was during the early days of emigration out of compassion for them; they had either to cultivate it or to let it be cultivated by others from their emigrant brothers. Then, he (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) granted a concession for leasing. It was reported that there is no harm in leasing in return for gold, silver, or cash, as in the two Sahīh Collections, Hanzhalah ibn Qays reported: "That he asked Rāfi‘ ibn Khadīj about leasing land, and he said: The Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) forbade leasing land. He said: I said: Even in return for gold and silver? He said: If it is in return for gold and silver, there is no harm in it." Also in the two Sahīh Collections, Ibn ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him and his father) reported: "The Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) agreed with the people of Khaybar to work and cultivate in return for half of the fruits or crops produced." Therefore, it is permissible for the owner to rent it in return for a standard percentage of what is cultivated therein, like one-fourth or one-third of its produce. The prohibition refers to whatever involves risk, ambiguity, and uncertainty. The most famous among such transactions was where the landowner used to specify for himself part of the land and what it produced.
The Hadīth highlights the fact that Allah Almighty and His Messenger (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) never forbid benefits and interests; rather, they forbid evil consequences and whatever leads to them..

1549
‘Abdullah ibn as-Sā’ib reported: We entered upon ‘Abdullah ibn Ma‘qil and asked him about Muzāra‘ah (sharecropping). He said: Thābit claimed that the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) forbade Muzāra‘ah and commanded Mu’ājarah (leasing land for rent), and he said: There is no harm in it..

Commentary : In the pre-Islamic era of ignorance, there prevailed types of sales that brimmed with oppression and injustice. When Islam came, it established fair sales and forbade whatever involved oppression. Hence, it forbade whatever involved fraud, uncertainty, and ambiguity to end disputes and conflicts among people, which is one of the Shariah-approved objectives.
In this Hadīth, Thābit ibn ad-Dahhāk (may Allah be pleased with him) reports that the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) forbade Muzāra‘ah, which is leasing the land in return for part of it and working on the land for part of its fruit production. The prohibition here refers to whatever involves risk, ambiguity, and uncertainty, and the most famous among such transactions was the one where the landowner used to specify for himself part of the land and what it produced. However, apart from this, it is permissible for the owner to lease it for a standard percentage of what is cultivated therein, like one-fourth or one-third of its produce, as it is mentioned in the two Sahīh Collections that Ibn ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him and his father) reported: "The Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) agreed with the people of Khaybar to work and cultivate in return for half of the fruits or crops produced."
The Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) commanded and made it permissible for them to practice Mu’ājarah instead of Muzāra‘ah and it means taking a known rent in gold, silver, or cash because this kind of lease is the farthest from uncertainty and ambiguity. In the two Sahīh Collections, Hanzhalah ibn Qays reported: "That he asked Rāfi‘ ibn Khadīj about leasing land, and he said: The Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) forbade leasing land. He said: I said: Even in return for gold and silver? He said: If it is in return for gold and silver, there is no harm in it.".

1551
Ibn ‘Umar reported: 'Umar ibn al-Khattāb expelled the Jews and the Christians from the land of Hijāz, and when the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) conquered Khaybar, he wanted to expel the Jews from that place, for when the land was conquered, it came to belong to Allah, His Messenger, and the Muslims. Hence, he wanted to expel the Jews from it. However, the Jews asked the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) to leave them there on condition that they should do all its work and have half the produce. The Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) said to them: We shall leave you there on that condition for as long as we wish. So, they stayed there until ‘Umar expelled them to Taymā’ and Arīhā’..

Commentary : Some of the Jewish tribes were living in Madīnah, and they kept betraying Muslims and breaching their covenants with the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) during his lifetime and with his Companions after his death. So, some of them made covenants with them, whereas others declared war against them.
In this Hadīth, ‘Abdullah ibn ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him and his father) reports that the Caliph ‘Umar ibn al-Khattāb (may Allah be pleased with him) expelled the Jews and the Christians, i.e., he deported them from the land of Hijāz, namely Makkah and Madīnah and their surroundings.
Ibn ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him and his father) reports that when the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) gained victory over the people of Khaybar and overcame them in the seventh year of Hijrah, and it was a village inhabited by the Jews almost 168 kilometers away from Madīnah from the direction of the Levant, he (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) wanted to expel the Jews from it, for when the land of Khaybar was conquered by Muslims, it became a possession of Allah, His Messenger, and Muslims. This clearly shows that the land was no longer owned by the Jews after being conquered by Muslims; rather, the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) distributed it among the victorious Muslims and it became among their possessions. What is meant by it being a possession of Allah and His Messenger is that some of its shares were given to the Muslims' public treasury.
On knowing that the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) wanted to deport them from Khaybar, the Jews asked him to allow them to stay in it and leave them on condition that they would work therein in the trees and the land in return for half of its fruits, whereas the other half would be for him, and he (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) agreed to the condition they stipulated for themselves. His saying: "For as long as we wish", was an exception made by the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) to the condition of their stay. It means that if Muslims wanted to expel you from that place, you would have to leave, as the Jews were not entitled to anything if Muslims had a different opinion. The agreement was concluded on such terms, and the Jews remained in Khaybar and stayed therein during the time of the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) and during the caliphate of Abu Bakr as-Siddīq (may Allah be pleased with him) until 'Umar ibn al-Khattāb (may Allah be pleased with him) became the caliph. During his time, Muslims were of the opinion of expelling the Jews from the Peninsula, and this acted as an invalidation of the contract between the Muslims and the Jews, and 'Umar (may Allah be pleased with him) expelled them from that place to Taymā' and Arīhā'.
Taymā’ is a place on the way of Madīnah and Tabūk city toward the Levant. Historically and geographically, it is located northwest of the Arabian Peninsula. It is almost 264 kilometres away to the east of Tabūk city and nearly 420 kilometres away to the north of Madīnah, whereas Arīhā’ was a village in the Levant.
The reason why ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him) expelled the Jews was narrated in Al-Bukhāri Collection where ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him) said: ‘Abdullah ibn ‘Umar went to his property there and was attacked at night, and his hands and feet were injured, and as we have no enemies there except them, they are our enemies and the ones whom we suspect, and I have made up my mind to exile them. So, he exiled them and gave them the price of the fruits they were entitled to in the form of money, camels, and goods, including saddles, ropes, etc. In the two Sahīh Collections, the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) said: "Expel the polytheists from Arabia."
The Hadīth shows that agricultural land is leased to the landowner for a known portion of its fruits, whereas the rest goes to its cultivator.
It points out that a Muslim ruler has the right to conclude treaties, make whatever exceptions he wants, and revoke such treaties based on the agreed-upon conditions, provided that all this is for the benefit of Muslims.
It highlights the fact that dealing with the People of the Book should be for what brings benefit, not harm, to the Muslim Ummah, along with being careful and taking precautions against them..