logo

| 2 Hadiths

Hadith
174
It was narrated that ‘Abdullah ibn ‘Umar said: Dogs used to urinate and come and go in the mosque, at the time of the Messenger of Allah (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him), and they did not sprinkle water on any of that..

Commentary : The urine of a dog must be purified if it gets onto the ground, or onto one’s garments and the like, just as it is enjoined to wash a vessel if a dog drinks from it. This hadith may be understood as referring to the opposite of that, because Ibn ‘Umar narrates that dogs used to urinate and come and go in the mosque at the time of the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him), and the Sahabah (may Allah be pleased with them) did not sprinkle water on any of that. What may be understood from the hadith is that they used to urinate outside the mosque, in the places that they frequented, and they would come and go in the mosque, passing through. It is not permissible for dogs to be allowed to remain in the mosque to the point that they play about and urinate in the building. Rather they used to come and go at some times, and there were no doors or gates on the mosque to prevent the dogs from passing through. When the dogs entered the mosque, it was possible that their saliva might drop on the floor of the mosque, but it was not something definite, and it was not known where it would be. Hence the companions of the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) did not sprinkle water on any of that, because certainty cannot be dispelled on the basis of doubt; they were certain that the mosque was clean and pure, but they were not certain as to whether any of the dogs’ saliva was on the ground, or where it was if that had happened. The Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) ordered that water be sprinkled over the urine of the Bedouin when he was certain that he had urinated and he knew where it was, and the urine of a dog is no less objectionable or impure (najis) than the urine of that Bedouin..

179
It was narrated from Zayd ibn Khalid that he asked ‘Uthman ibn ‘Affan (may Allah be pleased with him): What do you think of someone who has intercourse but does not ejaculate? ‘Uthman said: He should do wudu’ as for prayer and wash his penis. ‘Uthman said: I heard that from the Messenger of Allah (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him), then I asked ‘Ali, al-Zubayr, Talhah, and Ubayy ibn Ka‘b (may Allah be pleased with them) about that, and they all enjoined the same thing..

Commentary : Janabah (impurity following sexual activity) is major impurity and results either from intercourse or the emission of maniy (semen), which exhausts the entire body. Islamic teachings enjoin doing ghusl in that case, to energize and cleanse the body, and to purify it. In this hadith, it says that Zayd ibn Khaalid, who was one of the Tabi‘in, asked ‘Uthman ibn ‘Affan (may Allah be pleased with him): Is there ghusl for one who has intercourse with his wife then gets up and leaves her without ejaculating? ‘Uthman (may Allah have mercy on him) said: He should do wudu’ as for prayer and wash his penis, which may be understood as meaning that he does not have to do ghusl. Then ‘Uthman (may Allah be pleased with him) affirmed that he heard that from the Messenger of Allah (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him). Zayd also asked ‘Ali ibn Abi Talib, al-Zubayr ibn al-‘Awwam, Talhah ibn ‘Ubaydillah, and Ubayy ibn Ka‘b (may Allah be pleased with them) about a man having intercourse with his wife without ejaculating, and they instructed him to do the same as ‘Uthman had instructed him, which was to do wudu’ without doing ghusl.
However, the ruling that is mentioned in this hadith was the ruling at the beginning of Islam, then it was abrogated by what is reported in al-Sahihayn, that the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) said: “When a man sits between the four parts (arms and legs) of his wife and has intercourse with her, then ghusl is obligatory.” Ghusl is required of everyone who has intercourse with his wife, whether or not he ejaculates. This is the final ruling concerning this issue, as was determined at the time of the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) and afterwards, and it was proven from all of the Sahabah mentioned here that they issued fatwas requiring ghusl, not wudu’, to the extent that there is consensus in the ummah that ghusl is required of the one whose penis enters the vagina, even if he does not ejaculate..

180
It was narrated from Abu Sa‘id al-Khudri that the Messenger of Allah (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) sent for a man of the Ansar, who came with his head dripping with water. The Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) said: “Perhaps we made you hasten?” And he said yes. Then the Messenger of Allah (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) said: “If you were made to hasten, then you should have done wudu’.” Wahb followed that by saying: Shu‘bah told us: Abu ‘Abdillah said: Ghundar and Yahya did not narrate any mention of wudu’ from Shu‘bah..

Commentary : The companions of the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) used to hasten to respond to his call, so they attained the highest level of obedience and submission. This hadith proves that, as Abu Sa‘id al-Khudri (may Allah be pleased with him) narrates that the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) sent for a man of the Ansar – whose name was ‘Itban ibn Malik, or someone else – and he came rushing with his head dripping with water. The Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) realized that he had been having intercourse with his wife, so he said to him: “Perhaps we made you hasten?” In other words, perhaps you hastened to stop having intercourse before you ejaculated. The man said yes, so the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) taught him that if a man hastens to stop having intercourse, and does not ejaculate, then he does not have to do ghusl and wash his entire body; rather it is sufficient to do wudu’. However, this was the ruling at the beginning of Islam, then it was abrogated by what is reported in al-Sahihayn, that the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) said: “When a man sits between the four parts (arms and legs) of his wife and has intercourse with her, then ghusl is obligatory.” It is not stipulated that ejaculation should occur in order for ghusl to be necessary. The final ruling is that intercourse necessitates ghusl, regardless of whether the man ejaculates or not..

183
It was narrated from Kurayb, the freed slave of Ibn ‘Abbas, that ‘Abdullah ibn ‘Abbas told him that he spent the night in the house of Maymunah, the wife of the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him), who was his maternal aunt. [He said:] I lay along the width of the pillow and the Messenger of Allah (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) and his wife lay along its length. The Messenger of Allah (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) fell asleep, until halfway through the night, or shortly before that or after it. When the Messenger of Allah (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) woke up, he sat up, wiping the sleep from his face with his hand, then he recited the last ten verses of Surat Al ‘Imran. Then he went to a water skin that was hanging up and did wudu’ from it, and did wudu’ well. Then he went and prayed. Ibn ‘Abbas said: I got up and did what he had done, then I went and stood beside him. He put his right hand on my head, and took hold of my right ear and tweaked it. He prayed two rak‘ahs, then two rak‘ahs, then two rak‘ahs, then two rak‘ahs, then two rak‘ahs, then two rak‘ahs, then Witr. Then he lay down until the mu’adhdhin came to him, then he got up and prayed two brief rak‘ahs, then he went out and prayed Fajr..

Commentary : ‘Abdullah ibn ‘Abbas (may Allah be pleased with him) was a smart boy who followed the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) and learned his Sunnahs from him so that he could act upon them and convey them to those who came after him.
In this hadith, Ibn ‘Abbas (may Allah be pleased with him) narrates that he spent the night at the house of his maternal aunt Maymunah, the wife of the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him). He lay down and slept across the width of the pillow, and the Messenger of Allah (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) and his wife Maymunah slept along its length. The Messenger of Allah (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) slept until half way through the night, or a little before that or a little after, then he woke up. He sat up and wiped the traces of sleep from his face with his hand, to help him wake up fully. Then he recited the last ten verses of Surat Al ‘Imran, {Indeed, in the creation of the heavens and the earth …} [Al ‘Imran 3:190-200], to the end of the surah. Then he got up and went to an old water skin that was hanging there and did wudu’ from it, doing it properly and thoroughly. Then he stood up to pray tahajjud. Ibn ‘Abbas (may Allah be pleased with him) said: Then I got up and did what the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) had done, meaning that he did wudu’, doing it well and thoroughly. Then he stood beside the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) to pray with him. The Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) put his right hand on the head of Ibn ‘Abbas and took hold of his right ear, twisting and rubbing it, to wake him up, or to tell him to pay attention to the proper way of standing and where the one who is praying behind someone should stand, or to show affection to him, and the like. It was said that he tweaked his ear only because he stood on his left, so he took hold of his ear and pulled it to make him move around to stand on his right.
The Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) prayed twelve rak‘ahs, saying the taslim after each two rak‘ahs. Then he prayed Witr, meaning that he prayed an odd number of rak‘ahs, whether it was a single rak‘ah or three rak‘ahs. Then he lay down on his side until the mu’adhdhin came to wake him up for Fajr prayer. He got up and prayed two brief rak‘ahs, which were the two [Sunnah] rak‘ahs of Fajr, then he went out and offered the obligatory prayer of Fajr.
In this hadith we see that it is permissible to recite Qur’an and so on without wudu’, because the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) recited these verses after waking up from sleep, before doing wudu’.
It indicates that it is permissible to make the Sunnah prayer of Fajr brief.
It tells us of what the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) used to do of worship at night. .

185
It was narrated from ‘Amr ibn Yahya al-Mazini, from his father, that a man said to ‘Abdullah ibn Zayd, who was the grandfather of ‘Amr ibn Yahya: Can you show me how the Messenger of Allah (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) did wudu’? ‘Abdullah ibn Zayd said: Yes. He called for some water, and poured some water over his hands and washed them twice. Then he rinsed out his mouth and nose three times, then he washed his face three times, then he washed his arms twice each, up to the elbows. Then he wiped his head with his hands, front and back, starting at the front of his head until he brought his hands to the nape of his neck, then brought them back to where he had started. Then he washed his feet..

Commentary : The Sahabah (may Allah be pleased with them) were keen to learn the Prophet’s Sunnah and teach it to the Tabi‘in, so that the rulings of religion would become deeply rooted in a correct manner and would be handed down from one generation to the next.
In this hadith, the Tabi‘i ‘Amr ibn Yahya narrates from his father that a man – who was the grandfather of ‘Amr ibn Yahya; his name was ‘Umarah ibn Abi Hasan al-Mazini, as is mentioned in the reports – asked the Sahabi ‘Abdullah ibn Zayd (may Allah be pleased with him) how the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) used to do wudu’, according to what he had seen him do. ‘Abdullah ibn Zayd (may Allah be pleased with him) responded to his request and called for water, so that he could give him a practical demonstration of how wudu’ was to be done. He poured water on his hands and washed them twice before starting to do wudu’. Then he cleaned his mouth by moving water around in his mouth, then spitting it out. He cleaned his nose three times, sniffing up water then expelling it, which means that he took water into his nose to clean the inside of it. Then he washed his face three times. The definition of the face is from the hairline to the bottom of the chin, and from one earlobe to the other, right and left. Then he washed his hands and forearms up to the elbows, washing each one twice, by way of showing the easier way and to highlight the fact that it is permissible to do that twice. Then he wiped his head once with both hands, front and back. In other words, he put his hands on the front of his head, then brought them to the back of his head, until they reached the nape of his neck, and he brought them back to the front of the head. Wiping is less than washing. What is meant by the head is the place where the hair grows. Then he washed his feet up to the ankles, as is proven in the reports.
This hadith indicates that the learner may ask one who has knowledge, and teaching may be done by demonstrating actions.
It also indicates that the entire head is to be wiped..

189
It was narrated that Ibn Shihab said: Mahmoud ibn al-Rabi‘ – who is the one in whose face the Messenger of Allah (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) sprayed water from their well when he was a child, and ‘Urwah said, quoting from al-Miswar and someone else, each confirming that the other was telling the truth – told me: When the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) did wudu’, they almost fought over his leftover wudu’ water..

Commentary : The companions of the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) respected and venerated him very much, and held him in the highest esteem. One of the examples of that is what is mentioned in this hadith. The context is the story of al-Hudaybiyyah, when the polytheists prevented the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) and his companions from reaching the Sacred House for ‘umrah, and they sent the delegation to negotiate with him, until they drew up the treaty of al-Hudaybiyyah with him. The time for prayer came whilst ‘Urwah ibn Mas‘ud, who had come to negotiate with the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) was there. When the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) got up to do wudu’, his companions almost fought over his left over wudu’ water, because they were rushing to get it. But the one who narrated that – in this hadith – was Mahmoud ibn al-Rabi‘ (may Allah be pleased with him); he was the one in whose face the Messenger of Allah (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) had playfully sprayed water onto his face from his mouth, when Mahmoud was a small child; that water came from a bucket drawn from the well of the people of Mahmoud ibn al-Rabi‘.
This was also narrated by ‘Urwah ibn Zubayr, from al-Miswar ibn Makhramah (may Allah be pleased with him) and someone else, namely Marwan ibn al-Hakam, each of them confirming that the other was telling the truth; in other words, both al-Miswar and Marwan confirmed one another’s narration of the hadith.
This hadith indicates that leaders and people of virtue may play and joke with children.
It also highlights how the Sahabah venerated and respected the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him), and how they sought blessing (barakah) from his relics and leftover wudu water..

190
It was narrated that al-Ja‘d said: I heard al-Sa’ib ibn Yazid say: My maternal aunt took me to the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) and said: O Messenger of Allah, my sister’s son is in pain. He patted me on the head and prayed for blessing for me, then he did wudu’, and I drank some of his wudu’ water. Then I stood behind him and looked at the seal of prophethood between his shoulder blades, like the egg of a partridge..

Commentary : The Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) was kind and compassionate towards his companions, and would pray for them. He would offer supplication for them, pray for healing for those who were sick, and pray for the safe return of those who were absent. The Sahabah (may Allah be pleased with them) would come to him so that he would pray for them and their children. In this hadith, al-Sa’ib ibn Yazid (may Allah be pleased with him) narrates that he was sick, and he was very young at that time, so his maternal aunt took him to the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) and said to him: My sister’s son is in pain, meaning that he was sick. So the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) patted him on the head and prayed for blessing for him. Then he did wudu’, and al-Sa’ib drank some of the water that was left over after the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) had done wudu’. When al-Sa’ib stood behind the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him), he saw the seal of prophethood between his shoulder blades, which was the size of a partridge egg. The partridge is a type of bird.
The seal of prophethood was a mark between the shoulder blades of the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) which had been described in earlier scriptures; it was a sign by which the promised Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) would be known, after whom there would be no other Prophet. The seal of prophethood is described in the sahih Sunnah as something that stood out between the shoulder blades of the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him); it was surrounded by moles, which are dark spots, and was covered with a few hairs.
This hadith highlights how the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) took good care of his companions, and how he would pray for blessing for the children and pat their heads.
It highlights the virtue of al-Sa’ib ibn Yazid (may Allah be pleased with him).
It also tells us how the Sahabah sought blessing from the relics and wudu’ water of the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him)..

191
It was narrated from ‘Abdullah ibn Zayd that he poured water from the vessel onto his hands and washed them, then he washed – or rinsed his mouth and nose – from one handful of water, and he did that three times. Then he washed his arms up to the elbows, twice each, and he wiped his head, front and back, and washed his feet up to the ankles. Then he said: This is how the Messenger of Allah (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) did wudu’..

Commentary : The Sahabah (may Allah be pleased with them) learned the Sunnah of the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) and taught it to the Tabi‘in, so that the rulings of religion would become deeply rooted in a correct manner and would be handed down from one generation to the next.
In this hadith, the Tabi‘i Yahya al-Mazini narrates that a man came to ‘Abdullah ibn Zayd al-Ansari (may Allah be pleased with him) and asked him: Can you show me how the Messenger of Allah (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) did wudu’, and he said yes. Then he called for water, and when it was brought to him, he poured some water from the vessel onto his hands and washed them before starting to do wudu’. Then he cleaned his mouth by moving the water around in it, in order to wash it thoroughly. Then he spat the water out of his mouth, and sniffed up water into his nose to make it reach the highest part of the nose, and then blew it out of his nose, to cleanse his nose of any dirt that might be inside it. He cleaned his mouth and nose from one handful of water, and he did that three times. Then he washed his hands and forearms up to the elbows, twice each, washing each of them twice in order to show the easier way and to highlight the fact that it is permissible to do that.
Washing the forearms cannot be done except after washing the face, but he did not mention it here, although he mentioned it in another report in al-Bukhari, which says that he washed his face three times. It was said that perhaps he wanted to make the description brief here, because the issue of washing the face is clearly mentioned in the verse of wudu’, and there is no need to mention it here. It was also said that perhaps one of the narrators forgot to mention washing the face, as he was also not sure about whether he washed or rinsed his mouth. It was also suggested that the reason why the face was not mentioned is that it may be that what is omitted is the word face; in other words, then he washed his face. It was omitted because it is clear [from the context], and the word aw (or) in the phrase “or rinsed his mouth” means “and”, and the phrase “from one handful of water” refers to rinsing the mouth and nose only.
Then he wiped his head, placing his hands on the front of his head, then bringing them to the back of his head, until he reached the nape of his neck, then bringing them back to the front of his head again. He did that once, and wiping is less than washing. What is meant by the head here is the place where the hair grows. And he washed his feet up to the ankles.
Then ‘Abdullah ibn Zayd (may Allah be pleased with him) said, after he had finished his wudu’: This is how the Messenger of Allah (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) did wudu’. In other words, his wudu’ was a precise imitation of the wudu’ of the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him), and it was done to teach those around him of the Tabi‘in and others who wanted to learn the Sunnah of the Messenger of Allah (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him).
This hadith highlights how the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) did wudu’ in a practical manner.
It also indicates that one should wash the hands before putting them in the vessel when starting to do wudu’..

193
It was narrated from ‘Abdullah ibn ‘Umar, that he said: Men and women both used to do wudu’ at the time of the Messenger of Allah (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him)..

Commentary : Islam honours women and does not treat them as outcasts, as was the case during the jahiliyyah. It permits some things to both women and men, whilst paying attention to the guidelines on gender interactions.
In this hadith, Ibn ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him) narrates that both men and women used to do wudu’ at the time of the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him). In other words, they would both do wudu’ from one vessel, as is mentioned in other reports narrated by Ibn Majah. What is meant is that such actions were well known at that time, and the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) did not object to that or try to change it. This was quoted as evidence by those who think that water left over by women may be used by men, and water left over by men may be used by women, and if that were not allowed, they would not have done that, and the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) would have told them not to do that.
It is proven that the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) and ‘A’ishah (may Allah be pleased with her) did ghusl to purify themselves of janabah from a single vessel, and that he also did that with Maymunah. What is meant by them both doing wudu’ – as was narrated by Ibn ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him) – is that the men would do wudu’ and leave, then the women would come and do wudu’..

201
It was narrated that Anas ibn Malik said: The Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) would do ghusl using a sa‘ of water, up to a maximum of five mudds, and he would do wudu’ with one mudd. .

Commentary : Islamic teachings forbid extravagance, and extravagance refers to anything that is surplus to a person’s requirements, even with regard to using water for ghusl or wudu’. In this hadith, Anas ibn Malik (may Allah be pleased with him) tells us that the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) used to do ghusl using a sa‘ or five mudds, and he would do wudu’ with one mudd. The sa‘ is a unit of measurement equivalent to four mudds or eight ratls. In modern terms, it is said that the ratl is equivalent to approximately 380 grams, or less than half a litre; or it is said that it is equivalent to 538 grams, or more than half a litre. The mudd is equivalent to one quarter of a sa‘ or, it was said, it is equivalent to one and a third ratls, or two ratls. It is the amount of water that may be held in the joined palms of both hands.
This report tells us how much water was sufficient for the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him), not that it is not permissible to use more than that. Rather people vary in that regard; some people cannot do wudu’ and ghusl properly except with more than that, but whatever the case, it is essential to avoid being extravagant with water. This comes under the heading of proper use of resources and making the best use of them by disposing of them properly, and using only is much as is needed..

202
It was narrated from Sa‘d ibn Abi Waqqas, from the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him), that he wiped over his khuffs. ‘Abdullah ibn ‘Umar asked ‘Umar about that, and he said: Yes, if Sa‘d tells you something from the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him), then do not ask anyone else about it..

Commentary : Wiping over the khuffs is proven in sound, clear texts. This was narrated by a large number of the Sahabah (may Allah be pleased with them). The number of those who narrated it is more than eighty of the Sahabah, including the ten who were given the glad tidings of Paradise, and no one denies that except an innovator. In fact, wiping over the khuffs is one of the minor issues of fiqh which distinguishes Ahl al-Sunnah wal-Jama‘ah from others who have deviated and are misguided. This is one of the hadiths in which it was narrated from the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) that he wiped over the khuffs. The khuff is a kind of footwear made of thin leather that is worn on the foot and covers the ankles and more. This report mentions Sa‘d ibn Abi Waqqas (may Allah be pleased with him), when ‘Abdullah ibn ‘Umar asked his father ‘Umar ibn al-Khattab (may Allah be pleased with him) about this hadith. He said to him: If Sa‘d narrates something to you from the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him), then do not ask anyone else about it. That was because they trusted Sa‘d ibn Abi Waqqas (may Allah be pleased with them all).
This hadith highlights the virtue of Sa‘d ibn Abi Waqqas (may Allah be pleased with him).
It also highlights how the Sahabah spoke highly of one another..

205
It was narrated that ‘Amr ibn Umayyah said: I saw the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) wipe over his turban and khuffs..

Commentary : One of the distinguishing characteristics of Islamic teachings is that they make things easy for the accountable. Islam came to make easy that which is difficult for people. The Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) taught us about wudu’, how to do it and the etiquette thereof.
In this hadith, ‘Amr ibn Umayyah (may Allah be pleased with him) narrates that he saw the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) wipe over his turban, which is something that is wrapped around the head. Wiping over it is done when wanting to wipe the head, which is an essential part of wudu’. It is done by wiping a wet hand over whatever is visible of the hair, and completing the action by wiping over the turban, without taking it off the head. Then Anas (may Allah be pleased with him) narrated that when it came to washing the feet, which is another essential part of wudu’, the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) wiped over the khuffs instead of washing the feet. The khuff is something made of leather that covers the foot, and is usually worn for warmth. Wiping is done on the top of the feet, not the bottom, and the length of time for which one may wipe over the khuffs is one day and night for one who is not travelling, and three days and nights for one who is travelling.
This hadith indicates that it is valid to wipe over the turban and khuffs when doing wudu’..

214
It was narrated that Anas ibn Malik said: The Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) used to do wudu’ for every prayer. I said: What did you [the Sahabah] used to do? He said: One wudu’ would be sufficient for one of us so long as he did not invalidate it..

Commentary : Wudu’ will be the light of the believer on the Day of Resurrection, for wudu’ will brighten his face and limbs, and the Muslims will be recognized in the place of gathering by this characteristic, which is unique to this ummah. Because wudu’ has this virtue, the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) used to do wudu’ for every obligatory prayer, so as to attain this reward and virtue, as Anas ibn Malik (may Allah be pleased with him) narrated from him. Doing wudu’ for every prayer is Sunnah, but it is permissible for the Muslim to offer more than one prayer with one wudu’, so long as he has not invalidated it. This is what Anas (may Allah be pleased with him) meant when he said: One wudu’ would be sufficient for one of us so long as he did not invalidate it by minor impurity that invalidates wudu’, such as passing wind, urinating or defecating. It is proven in Sahih Muslim, in the hadith of Buraydah (may Allah be pleased with him), that he said: The Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) used to do wudu’ for every prayer, but on the day of the conquest [of Makkah] he offered all the prayers with one wudu’. ‘Umar said to him: You have done something that you never used to do. He said: “I did it deliberately”, meaning that he did it in order to show that it is permissible to offer more than one prayer with one wudu’.
This hadith highlights the virtue of doing wudu’ for every prayer..

216
It was narrated that Ibn ‘Abbas said: The Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) passed by one of the walled gardens of Madinah or Makkah, and he heard the sound of two people being punished in their graves. The Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) said: “They are being punished, but they are not being punished for something serious.” Then he said: “Nay [it is serious]; one of them used not to take precautions to protect himself from his urine getting on him, and the other used to walk about spreading malicious gossip.” Then he called for a stalk of a palm leaf, broke it in two, and placed one piece of it on each grave. It was said to him: O Messenger of Allah, why did you do that? He said: “Perhaps they will reduce [the punishment] for them so long as they do not dry out, or until they dry out.”.

Commentary : The grave is the first stage of the hereafter, and punishment and bliss in the grave are real. The Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) explained some deeds that lead to punishment in the grave, as mentioned in this hadith, in which ‘Abdullah ibn ‘Abbas (may Allah be pleased with him) narrated that the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) passed by one of the walled gardens of Madinah or Makkah – this refers to uncertainty on the part of Jarir ibn ‘Abdul Hamid, one of the narrators of the hadith. Al-Bukhari narrated it in al-Adab al-Mufrad, where he said: one of the gardens of Madinah, with certainty, beyond any doubt. The Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) heard the sound of two dead people being punished in their graves, and he said: “They are being punished, but they are not being punished for something serious.” In other words, they are not being punished for something you regard as serious, although in fact it is serious before Allah (may He be exalted). Hence he said “Nay,” to indicate that the matter is indeed serious.
Then the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) explained the reason for their punishment, which was that one of them used not to take precautions to protect himself from urine contaminating his body and clothes, and the other used to walk around spreading malicious gossip among the people, so he would tell one person what someone else had said with the intention of causing harm, stirring up trouble and creating hatred among people.
Then the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) called for the stalk of a palm leaf; he broke it into two halves, and placed one piece of it on each of the two graves. The Sahabah asked him: Why did you do that? And he told them that he had done that in the hope that Allah (may He be exalted) would reduce the punishment for them until the palm stalks that he had placed on their graves dried out. It was said that the reason why he chose palm stalks was that they are slow to dry out. It was also said that this may be interpreted as meaning that he offered supplication for them and prayed that their punishment would be reduced so long as the palm stalks remained fresh and moist, not that there is anything inherently special about palm stalks, or that that which is fresh and moist has some special impact that are not found in a dry stalk. It was said that what is meant is that the palm stalk glorifies Allah so long as it remains fresh and moist, thus the reduction of the punishment was by the blessing of that tasbih.
This hadith affirms the punishment of the grave and confirms that it is real; we must believe in it and accept it.
It also warns against not taking precautions to protect oneself from urine; this applies also to other types of impurity that could contaminate one’s body or garments.
It also warns against malicious gossip, and highlights the bad consequences thereof..

217
It was narrated that Anas ibn Malik said: When the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) went to answer the call of nature, I would bring the water to him and he would wash himself with it..

Commentary : The teachings of Islam urge Muslims to purify themselves both physically and in intangible ways. The Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) taught us how to purify ourselves after relieving ourselves.
In this hadith, Anas ibn Malik (may Allah be pleased with him) speaks of when the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) went out to relieve himself – the Arabic term refers to going out to a spacious, flat piece of land where they used to go to relieve themselves, because they used to go out to places where there were no people, before they acquired outhouses and bathrooms in their houses. Hence Anas (may Allah be pleased with him) narrated that he used to bring water to the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him), so that he could wash himself and clean the site of the urine and faeces, to make sure that it was clean. What is mostly known of the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) is that he used to clean himself with pebbles, as is proven in the reports. The hadith of Anas (may Allah be pleased with him) highlights the fact that it is valid to clean oneself with water.
Anas (may Allah be pleased with him) was a servant of the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him); he used to follow him wherever he went to see how he could serve him, and so that he could do whatever was asked of him. He knew how much the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) loved to purify himself with water after Allah praised those who purify themselves..

1552
Jābir ibn ‘Abdullāh reported: The Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) entered an orchard upon ’Umm Ma‘bad and said: O ’Umm Ma‘bad, who planted these palm trees, a Muslim or a disbeliever? She said: Rather, a Muslim. He said: No Muslim plants a plant wherefrom a man, an animal, or a bird eats except that it will be counted for him as a charity until the Day of Judgment..

Commentary : Islam has encouraged all types of righteous and good acts and has made them worthy of reward and recompense. One of these righteous acts promoted by Islam is doing whatever entails goodness and benefit for human beings and animals.
In this Hadīth, Jābir ibn ‘Abdullāh (may Allah be pleased with him and his father) narrates that the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) entered "an orchard," i.e., a garden of palm trees, and ’Umm Ma‘bad was in that orchard. It is said: She is the wife of Zayd ibn Hārithah. The Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) asked her about the one who planted the palm trees in that orchard, whether he was a Muslim or a disbeliever. She informed him that the one who planted it was a Muslim. Thereupon, the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) said: "No Muslim plants a plant," i.e., cultivates plants, "wherefrom a man, an animal, or a bird eats" he (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) mentioned them in general to include all living beings in the sea and on land, "except that it will be counted for him as a charity until the Day of Judgment" because of eating from what he has planted, as long as the benefit of such plants remains even if it remains until the Day of Judgment. The Muslim was mentioned in particular because he mostly plants with the intention that Muslims would gain strength from the fruits of such a plant to worship Allah Almighty and because the Muslim is the one who gets a reward. In contrast, the disbeliever does not get a reward for his good deeds, which might only alleviate his punishment, or he might be provided with food and thus be repaid in this world.
The Hadīth indicates that rewards in the Hereafter for good deeds are exclusive to Muslims and not for the disbelievers.
It also points out the merit of agriculture and cultivation given their effect in populating the earth and benefitting all creatures.
It encourages the construction of earth so that man himself can live or those who come after him on account of whom he gets rewarded..

1553
Jābir ibn ‘Abdullah reported that the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) said: When - [another version reads]: if - you sell your brother some fruit and it is stricken by a calamity, it is unlawful for you to take anything from him. How can you take your brother's money unjustly?!.

Commentary : Islam is keen on protecting and maintaining rights, and such keenness is manifest in its warning against taking people's rights unjustly and its severe threat against whoever transgresses or violates such a prohibition.
In this Hadīth, the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) clarifies that if someone buys fruits from his Muslim brother, the form of this sale is to buy the fruits while still on the trees or while still in the seller's possession and not yet delivered to the buyer, then, the fruits are stricken by a calamity, which is a disaster or blight that overruns the fruits, causing their destruction and ruin. In this case, it will not be lawful for the seller, who is the owner of the fruits, to take anything from the buyer. How could he take his brother's money when the fruits are damaged and stricken by blight and calamity that prevented benefiting from them?! No one should take his brother's money wrongfully because when the fruits are spoilt, there is nothing left for the buyer in return for what he has paid. Hence, the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) forbade selling fruits before they seem in good condition and ripen - as mentioned in the two Sahīh Collections - since rulings are based on what is predominant.
In the version mentioned in the two Sahīh Collections, the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) was asked: "What is its good condition? He said: Till there is no danger of blight," and it turns out as desired as when it appears to be ripe, for only then, it is safe from disease, which is the blight..

1554
Jābir reported: The Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) commanded that calamities should be remitted..

Commentary : The Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) established the pillars of society upon mercy and solidarity, knowing that if financial transactions are not based on justice, they will lead to the spread of oppression and the transgressing of rights among people.
In this Hadīth, Jābir ibn ‘Abdullah (may Allah be pleased with him and his father) reports that the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) commanded that Jawā’ih (calamities), plural of 'jā’ihah', which is the blight that affects fruits and leads to their eradication, should be remitted. This refers to every prevalent spoiler like rain, snow, locusts, wind, or fire. This means: If fruits are sold after seeming to be in good condition and were then hit by some calamity, the loss is to be suffered by the owner, not the buyer. In a version by Muslim: "If you sell your brother some fruit and it is stricken by a calamity, it is unlawful for you to take anything from him. How can you take your brother's money unjustly?!" This means: None of you should take his brother's money wrongfully because something predominant has overwhelmed the fruits without any negligence on the buyer's part. Therefore, the seller should not require him to pay for what Allah has damaged before he took possession of it in the usual manner, and because when the fruits are spoilt, there is nothing left for the buyer in return for what he has paid..

1556
Abu Sa‘īd al-Khudri reported: At the time of the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) a man suffered a loss in fruits he had purchased, and his debts increased. The Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) said: "Give him charity." So, the people gave him charity, but that was not enough to repay his debt in full. Thereupon, the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) said to his creditors: "Take what you find, and that is all you may have.".

Commentary : The Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) established the pillars of society upon mercy and solidarity. He used to urge creditors to reduce the debt for the debtor who was afflicted by some calamity that ruined his property, be it fruits, cash, assets, or anything else. Therefore, it became part of the Muslim's attitude to constantly seek to fulfill his Muslim brother's need, especially in times of calamities and misfortunes.
In this Hadīth, Abu Sa‘īd al-Khudri (may Allah be pleased with him) reports that at the time of the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him), a man's fruits, which he purchased but had not paid for yet, suffered blight that caused them damage, thereby his debts increased. The Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) commanded people to give him charity so he can repay his debt. In obedience to the Prophet's command, the Companions (may Allah be pleased with them) gave the man charity; however, what he took from people was not enough to settle his debt because it was huge, and there still remained an unsettled part thereof. The Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him), thus, ordered the creditors - those to whom the debt was owed - to take what they found with him from the remaining fruits that could still be useful in addition to what he got from charity. His saying: "and that is all you may have," i.e., you should not ask for what is left of the debt and what he is not able to repay. It was said: That is all you may have because he is currently bankrupt and should be given respite until it is easy for him to pay it back, as Allah Almighty says: {If the debtor is in hardship, give him respite until it is easy for him to pay [the debt] back.} [Surat al-Baqarah: 280]
The Hadīth denotes that whatever the bankrupt still has, should be taken according to its assessed price. He should not be imprisoned or rebuked; rather, he should be given respite until it is easy for him to pay back, then he could settle his debts.
It also shows the merit of consoling the needy and the indebted, and it encourages the act of giving them charity..

1563
‘Abdullah ibn Abi Qatādah reported: Abu Qatādah went looking for his debtor, who hid from him. Then, when he found him, he (the debtor) said: "I am insolvent." Thereupon he said: "By Allah?" He said: "By Allah." So, he said: "I heard the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) say: 'Whoever is pleased to be saved by Allah from the anguish of the Day of Judgment, let him give an insolvent respite or grant him remission.'".

Commentary : Islam is keen on providing treatment for evil human tendencies in transactions, as it is keen on solving disputes between people through tolerance and facilitation in fulfilling financial rights.
In this Hadīth, the Tābi‘i ‘Abdullah ibn Abi Qatādah reports that his father, Abu Qatādah al-Ansāri (may Allah be pleased with him), "went looking for his debtor," and the debtor is the person who owes money to someone else. The debtor hid from Abu Qatādah when he was searching for him, and when Abu Qatādah (may Allah be pleased with him) found him, the debtor said to him: "I am insolvent," and I have no money to repay your debt. So, Abu Qatādah (may Allah be pleased with him) asked him by Allah if he really did not have money, and the debtor swore by Allah that he was telling the truth.
Thereupon, Abu Qatādah (may Allah be pleased with him) informed him that he heard the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) say: "'Whoever is pleased," i.e., glad "to be saved by Allah from the anguish of the Day of Judgment," "Karb" (anguish) means distress and poverty, and "the Karb of the Day of Judgment" means: its hardships and horrors. "Let him give the insolvent respite," i.e., postpone or delay the demand for payment for one who failed to repay it on time. "Or grant him remission," i.e., reduce the debt or cancel it, as Allah Almighty says: {If the debtor is in hardship, give him respite until it is easy for him to pay [the debt] back. But if you waive it as charity, that is better for you.} [Surat al-Baqarah: 280]
The Hadīth encourages the act of giving the insolvent person respite or canceling his debt..

1565
Jābir ibn ‘Abdullāh reported: The Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) forbade the selling of a camel's copulation, selling water and land for cultivation. This is what the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) forbade..

Commentary : There are some natural resources that man cannot dispense with and that are beneficial for all people. If such resources are unavailable, man will perish. Hence, they have been made common among Muslims. Moreover, one may possess what others cannot dispense with, and he may possess something without exerting effort, something that Allah has bestowed upon him, and it could exceed his need, and giving out this surplus is a manifestation of noble morals.
In this Hadīth, Jābir ibn ‘Abdullah (may Allah be pleased with him and his father) reports that the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) forbade the selling of a camel's copulation. In a version by Al-Bukhāri, Ibn Umar (may Allah be pleased with him and his father) reported: "The Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) forbade the stud fees of a stallion," which is the fee taken for the copulation of a male animal, whether a horse, camel, ram, etc. Its form: When someone gives his stud to someone else who owns females and keeps it with him until the stud mates with the females for a fee in return, or when the owner of the females brings them to the owner of the stud and leaves them with him. The Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) forbade this. It is said that because it is ambiguous and uncertain whether it will be of benefit or not and whether the female will or will not be inseminated, it is presumable and involves uncertainty. Or the prohibition could be interpreted as a way of encouraging noble morals and recommending lending it without a return so animals would reproduce abundantly. This is something that Muslims should be willing to grant each other because it is one type of simple assistance that leads to the dominance of the spirit of cooperation and solidarity among people. In the Hadīth of Anas ibn Mālik (may Allah be pleased with him) in At-Tirmidhi Collection, he reported: The Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) granted a concession in the honorarium, i.e., the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) permitted the acceptance of a gift given by the female owner as an honorarium, not as a compensation.
He also forbade selling water. It is said: The prohibition is general, as water should not be sold to Muslims given the fact that it is from their life necessities. In another version by Muslim, the prohibition has to do with "selling excess water," which is the water exceeding the need of the well owner, his children, cattle, and crops. In the two Sahīh Collections, Abu Hurayrah (may Allah be pleased with him) reported that the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) said: "Do not withhold excess water to prevent thereby excess herbage," which is the grass. This means: When a man owns a well in the desert and it has water that exceeds his needs and there is grass that has no other source of water except this water, the cattle owner cannot graze it unless they are watered from this well, in this case, it is unlawful for him to withhold this excess water from the cattle and he has to give it out without compensation.
The Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) forbade land for cultivation, i.e., leasing it for cultivation. This is when a man gives his land to someone to cultivate in return for taking a share of his produce. This has many forms, as the Companions used to cultivate the land in return for one-third, one-fourth, or half its fruits during the lifetime of the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him). In the two Sahīh Collections and Musnad of Ahmad Collection - and this is the wording of Ahmad - Hanzhalah ibn Qays reported that Rāfi‘ ibn Khadīj said: "The Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) forbade leasing farms. He said: I said: Even if it is in return for gold and silver? He said: No, but he forbade it in return for part of its produce, but in return for gold and silver, there is no harm in it." In a version by Muslim: "As for something known and guaranteed, there is nothing wrong with it." This Hadīth indicates that what the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) has forbidden was something clearly evil, namely the unfair and unjust Muzāra‘ah (sharecropping). This is why he prohibited it; however, there is nothing wrong with something known and guaranteed in dinar and dirham, as mentioned in the Hadīths and narrations.
The Hadīth encourages the act of giving excess water for free without demanding compensation..

1568
Rāfi‘ ibn Kahdīj reported that the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) said: "The price of a sold dog is evil, the earning of a prostitute is evil, and the earning of a cupper is evil.".

Commentary : Allah has made what is good lawful for His slaves and has made unlawful for them whatever is evil from among food, drink, gains, trade, etc. Shariah has also urged Muslims to have self-esteem and to look down on lowly things.
In this Hadīth, the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) said: "The price of a sold dog is evil," i.e., unlawful. This means that the price of selling or buying it or what is earned from that is ill-gotten money because it is prohibited to own or raise dogs except for dogs that are used in guarding livestock or farming. It is said: This is a general ruling, whether it is trained to hunt or untrained, and whether it is permissible to keep it or not. It is also said: The dog used in guarding and hunting is an exception because it is useful, as mentioned in the Sunan At-Tirmidhi Collection from the Hadīth of Abu Hurayrah (may Allah be pleased with him): "Except for the hunting dog." The version of Ad-Dāraqutni reads: "Except for the dog trained to hunt," which is the one accustomed to hunting. It is as if the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) forbade the price of the dog except for the dog that is permitted to be kept for a certain benefit, or perhaps the prohibition of the dog's price was at the beginning of Islam. Then it was abrogated later, and it became permissible to use it in hunting and, thus became like all the birds of prey in terms of the permissibility of selling it.
Likewise, the money the adulteress takes in return for adultery and for giving herself to a foreign man is unlawful because adultery is unlawful, and the money gained therefrom is unlawful. The Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) called it "dowry" because it takes the form of a dowry, as it is paid in return for being allowed by the woman to have intercourse with her. In the pre-Islamic era of ignorance, they used to force their slave girls to commit adultery and take it as a means of earning money. But Islam criticized this, as Allah Almighty says: {Do not compel your slave girls into prostitution – if they wish to keep chaste – seeking the worldly gains of this life. But if anyone compels them, then Allah, after such a compulsion, is All-Forgiving, Most Merciful.} [Surat an-Nūr: 33]
"And the earnings of a cupper are evil." "Hajjām" (cupper) is the one making Hijāmah (cupping), which means drawing blood from veins and removing the bad blood from the body. Being an evil earning does not mean it is unlawful because the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) had Hijāmah made for him and he paid the cupper a fee, as mentioned in the Two Sahīh Collections from the Hadīth of Ibn ‘Abbās (may Allah be pleased with him and his father). Had it been unlawful, the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) would not have given him. So, the Hadīths that forbid the cupper's earnings and clearly state that they are evil are interpreted in the sense of encouraging the act of keeping away from and rising above this means of earning and promoting good morals and noble things. Or perhaps the prohibition was at the beginning of Islam, then it was abrogated. So, when he gave the cupper his fee, this abrogated the previous ruling..

1572
Jābir ibn ‘Abdullāh reported: The Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) commanded us to kill dogs; even when a woman brought her dog along with her from the desert, we used to kill it. Then, the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) forbade killing them and said: Restrict yourselves to the pitch-black one that has two spots, for it is a devil..

Commentary : The pure Shariah has regulated the rulings of everything even animals, which include dogs. The Shariah has determined the way of benefiting from them and has clarified the rulings of what is lawful and unlawful regarding them.
In this Hadīth, Jābir ibn ‘Abdullah (may Allah be pleased with him and his father) reports that the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) commanded them to kill all dogs without any exception, to the extent that even when a woman came from the Bādiyah, which is the desert, bringing along her dog that would guard her and accompany her, we used to kill it in response to the Prophet's command. Afterwards, the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) forbade killing dogs except for the pitch-black dog, the one that is totally black, "that has two spots," i.e., the two white spots above his eyes, as this dog is to be killed. His saying: "For it is a devil", means either in the true sense of the word for being pure harm that is void of any benefit or it is far from being beneficial and close to being harmful and detrimental, which is the case with the devil. So, this is a simile where the black dog is likened to the devil given its malice and because the black dog is the worst of dogs, the least in benefit, the most harmful, and the most mordacious.
It was authentically reported in other Hadīths that the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) forbade killing dogs except for the mordacious dog that hurts people, which should be killed, as mentioned in the Hadīth of ‘Ā’ishah (may Allah be pleased with her) in the two Sahīh Collections: "Five animals are all vicious and harmful and are to be killed inside the Sacred Precincts: the crow, the kite, the scorpion, the mouse, and the mordacious dog."
In this Hadīth and similar ones, there is a prohibition of killing dogs, apart from those excluded, which are kept for benefiting from them in guarding, hunting, etc. It is said: Rather, he commanded killing them at first because people were so accustomed to having them, and dogs used to share with them their utensils. So, he wanted to wean them off that and, thus, gave the command of killing. However, when the idea of their filthiness and keeping them away became firmly established in themselves, he forbade this. Such a prohibition abrogated that command. So, the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) forbade killing all dogs, even jet-black dogs, except for the harmful and aggressive ones..

1578
Abu Sa‘īd al-Khudri reported: I heard the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) delivering a sermon in Madīnah saying: "O People, Allah Almighty is alluding to intoxicants, and perhaps Allah will send down a ruling regarding it. So, whoever has some of it, let him sell it and benefit from it." He said: Only a short while after that, the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) said: "Verily, Allah Almighty has forbidden intoxicants. Whoever knew this verse and had some of it, let him neither drink it nor sell it." He said: The people received this (prohibition) and came out into the street of Madīnah with what they had and poured it all out..

Commentary : Advising common people regarding their religious and worldly affairs is necessary, and the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) was the keenest on offering his Ummah advice on their religious and worldly affairs.
In this Hadīth, Abu Sa‘īd al-Khudri (may Allah be pleased with him) reports: When the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) felt that intoxicants would be prohibited - as it was lawful at first - he advised them to hasten to benefit from it. He addressed his Companions (may Allah be pleased with them) in a sermon that he delivered in Madīnah saying: "O People, Allah Almighty is alluding to intoxicants," i.e., He is mentioning it without prohibiting it or making it unlawful, in reference to the verse in which Allah Almighty says: {They ask you about intoxicants and gambling. Say, “In both, there is a great sin, and some benefits for people, but their sin is far greater than their benefit.”} [Surat al-Baqarah: 219] And His saying: {O you who believe, do not approach the prayer while you are intoxicated until you know what you are saying.} [Surat an-Nisā’: 43] The two verses include a reference and a hint that intoxicants will be inevitably prohibited. Hence, as a word of advice, the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) ordered his Companions that whoever had something of such intoxicants should either sell it or benefit from it before it is completely prohibited in such a way that would make it impermissible to either sell it or benefit from it. This is because some of them used to work and trade in intoxicants and others used to keep and store them. The Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) wanted to protect their properties, and only a short while after the Prophet's advice, Allah revealed the prohibition of intoxicants in His Book saying: {O you who believe, intoxicants, gambling, [sacrificing on] stone alters, and divining arrows are of Satan’s evil work; therefore, avoid such [evil], so that you may be successful.} [Surat al-Mā’idah: 90] When it was revealed, the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) informed them that whoever learned about this verse must "neither drink it nor sell it." So, all those who had something of the intoxicants poured it all out in the streets of Madīnah.
The Companions (may Allah be pleased with them) understood from the Prophet's prohibition of its drinking and selling that it must not also be used in any aspect. Hence, they hastened to pour it out and ruin it. Had it contained any permissible benefit, the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) would have called attention to it.
The Hadīth indicates how the ruler should take care of his Ummah's interests, prepare people, and gradually issue rulings, especially concerning matters that are deeply rooted in the society.
It also shows how a true believer hastens to respond to Allah's command..

1579
‘Abdur-Rahmān ibn Wa‘lah as-Saba’i (from the people of Egypt) reported: That he asked ‘Abdullah ibn ‘Abbās about what is squeezed from grapes. Ibn ‘Abbas (may Allah be pleased with him and his father) said: A man gave the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) a waterskin of wine as a gift. Thereupon, the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) said to him: Did you know that Allah has forbidden it? He said: No. He, then, whispered to another man, so the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) said to him: What did you whisper to him? He said: I ordered him to sell it. He said: The One Who has forbidden drinking it has forbidden selling it. He said: So, he opened the waterskin and poured out what was in it..

Commentary : Khamr (intoxicants) is the mother of all evils and its harm is far greater than its benefit. A Muslim must by no means drink it. The Shariah has forbidden all forms of Khamr and all forms of benefiting from it.
In this Hadīth, the Tābi‘i ‘Abdur-Rahmān ibn Wa‘lah narrates that he asked ‘Abdullah ibn ‘Abbās (may Allah be pleased with him and his father) about the ruling on the drink extracted from grapes; he was apparently asking about the Khamr derived from grapes. ‘Abdullah ibn ‘Abbās (may Allah be pleased with him and his father) informed him that a man gave the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) "a waterskin of wine" as a gift. "Rāwiyah" (waterskin): a container made of skin. Thereupon, the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) asked him: Did you know that Allah Almighty has forbidden it? Perhaps the question was intended to find out about his stance, for if he knew about its prohibition, he would object upon him for giving it as a gift, holding and carrying it, and he would be subject to discretionary punishment. However, when he informed him that he did not know about it, he excused him. It is possible that the man was among those outside Madīnah before the ruling of its prohibition spread. So, the man negated having any knowledge about its prohibition and its unlawfulness. This man whispered secretly to another man beside him without letting the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) hear him. The Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him), thus, asked him: "What did you whisper to him?" The Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) asked him about what he whispered only because he probably thought that his words to the other man had to do with this wine, so he wanted to clarify to him the comprehensiveness of the ruling of Khamr and how the prohibition is not just about drinking it as will be clarified later. The man answered the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) saying: "I ordered him to sell it." In a version by Ahmad: "The man went to his servant and said: Go and sell it," whereupon, he (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) said: "The One Who has forbidden drinking it has forbidden selling it," so selling it is just as prohibited as drinking it. His saying: "The One," is an indirect reference to the name of Allah Almighty, as if he said: Allah has forbidden drinking it and has forbidden selling it. It could also mean: What required the prohibition of drinking it required the prohibition of selling it, since it could only be wanted for drinking, so, if drinking is forbidden, then the sale is impermissible as it is deemed to be consumption of property wrongfully. So, the man opened the Mazādah - which is the waterskin - and poured out what was in it and got rid of it.
What is apparent from the reporting of Ibn ‘Abbās (may Allah be pleased with him and his father) is that this Hadīth is an answer to the question of ‘Abdur-Rahmān ibn Wa‘lah is to make it clear that the prohibition is relevant to whatever is considered Khamr, is intoxicating, and causes one to lose control of his mental faculties, whether it is made from grapes or other things.
The Hadīth highlights the Prophet's good approach of teaching.
It points out the prohibition of selling intoxicants.
It indicates that whoever presents something unlawful as a gift, his gift must not be accepted.
It signifies that whoever commits a sin without knowing about its prohibition incurs no sin and must not be subject to discretionary punishment..

1585
‘Uthmān ibn ‘Affān reported that the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) said: Do not sell a dinar for two dinars or a dirham for two dirhams..

Commentary : Riba (usury) is one of the types of exploitation in transactions. It entails great harm and involves unlawful earnings and taking extra money wrongfully. Therefore, it has been prohibited in all the laws that have been revealed. Riba has various types, all of which are prohibited. Riba al-Fadl (usury of surplus) is one type and it means selling an item that is subject to Riba rulings for another of the same type with excess in one of the two, like selling a gold dinar for two dinars and a silver dirham for two dirhams, which have been prohibited by the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) in this Hadīth.
An example of this is selling new gold or silver coins for those that weigh more, thus, taking in return for every one coin two old gold or silver coins. The Shariah states that such a sale is not to be concluded unless they are both alike and equal in weight, regardless of the quality or the inferiority, and on condition that the two currencies are present during the sale transaction and are exchanged hand to hand. So, equality and exchange during the contract session are conditions when selling an item for another item of the same type. However, if the type varies and the cause remains - like selling gold for silver - equality is no longer required, but exchange during the contract session is still a condition, as the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) said in Sahīh Muslim Collection: "If these classes differ, sell as you wish as long as payment is made hand to hand."
The Hadīth indicates the prohibition of Riba al-Fadl (usury of surplus)..

1586
Mālik ibn Aws ibn al-Hadathān reported: I came saying: "Who will exchange the dirhams?" Talhah ibn ‘Ubaydullah, who was with ‘Umar ibn al-Khattāb, said: "Show us your gold, then come to us when our servant comes to give you your silver." Thereupon, ‘Umar ibn al-Khattāb said: "No, by Allah, you must either give him his silver (now) or give him back his gold, for the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) said: 'Silver for gold is Riba (usury) unless they are exchanged on the spot; wheat for wheat is Riba unless they are exchanged on the spot; barley for barley is Riba unless they are exchanged on the spot; and dried dates for dried dates is Riba unless they are exchanged on the spot.'".

Commentary : Riba (usury) is one of the types of exploitation in transactions. It entails great harm and involves unlawful earnings and taking extra money wrongfully. Therefore, it has been prohibited in all the revealed laws.
In this Hadīth, Mālik ibn Aws ibn al-Hadathān (may Allah be pleased with him) reports that he came to a gathering and ‘Umar ibn al-Khattāb (may Allah be pleased with him) was among them. Mālik was saying: "Who will exchange the dirhams?" i.e., Who will buy the golden dinars that I have with silver dirhams, as Mālik ibn Aws ibn al-Hadathān had one hundred dinars - as mentioned in the version of Al-Bukhāri - which he wanted to exchange for dirhams. Talhah ibn ‘Ubaydullah - who was in this gathering with ‘Umar ibn al-Khattāb (may Allah be pleased with him) - said: "Show us your gold," i.e., give us your dinars to see them, "then come to us" later on "when our servant comes, we will give you your silver," i.e., the silver dirhams. On hearing this, ‘Umar ibn al-Khattāb (may Allah be pleased with him) said: "No," which indicates his refusal of this kind of transaction. Then, ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him) swore that he should give him the silver he wanted to buy on the spot, or he should give him back the gold that he took from him. He explained that by quoting the statement of the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him): "Silver for gold is Riba," i.e., selling silver for gold is Riba (usury) in all cases "unless they are exchanged on the spot," i.e., except in the case of physical presence and the immediate exchange of items hand to hand. Likewise, selling "Burr" - which is wheat - for Burr, selling barley for barley, and selling dried dates for dried dates all constitute Riba in all cases except in the case of physical presence and the immediate exchange of items hand to hand.
The Hadīth denotes the prohibition of the Nasī’ah Riba (usury of deferred payment).
It also encourages the act of forbidding evil for whoever has the ability to do so.
It points out that the evidence should be mentioned when forbidding evil.
It also shows that some knowledge may not be known to an old man until someone else reminds him of it..

1587
Abu Qilābah reported: I was in the Levant in a circle and Muslim ibn Yasār was there. There came Abu al-Ash‘ath. He said: They said: Abu al-Ash‘ath, Abu al-Ash‘ath. So, he sat down. I said to him: Narrate to our brother the Hadīth of ‘Ubādah ibn as-Sāmit. He said: Yes. We set out on an expedition while Mu‘āwiyah was the leader of the people, and we gained a lot of spoils. There were silver utensils among such spoils, so Mu‘āwiyah ordered a man to sell them for the people's payments. The people hastened to that. On hearing about it, 'Ubādah ibn as-Sāmit stood up and said: Verily, I heard the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) forbidding the sale of gold for gold, silver for silver, wheat for wheat, barley for barley, dry dates for dry dates, and salt for salt except equal for equal and like for like. So, whoever made or accepted an addition has committed Riba (usury). Thereupon, the people returned what they had taken. On hearing about it, Mu‘āwiyah stood up and delivered a sermon saying: What is the matter with some men narrating from the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) Hadīths that we had not heard from him although we saw and accompanied him?! Thereupon, ‘Ubādah ibn as-Sāmit stood up and repeated the story, then said: We will surely narrate what he heard from the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) even if Mu‘āwiyah disliked this, or he said, Even if it is against his will. I do not mind if I do not accompany him in his troops on a black night..

Commentary : The Companions (may Allah be pleased with them) used to advise one another in all states. They used to convey the Shariah-related commands and prohibitions without showing favoritism to or fear of a ruler or a caliph, and they would all comply with the truth.
In this Hadīth, the Tābi‘i Abu Qilābah ‘Abdullah ibn Zayd reports that he was in the Levant - which is currently Syria, Jordan, Palestine, and Lebanon - and was sitting in a circle that was attended by the Tābi‘i Muslim ibn Yasār. They were probably holding a gathering of knowledge. Then, Abu al-Ash‘ath Sharāhīl ibn Ādah came and sat with them. Abu Qilābah said to him: "Narrate to our brother" referring to Muslim ibn Yasār. Abu al-Ash‘ath responded to him and narrated to him the Hadīth of the Companion ‘Ubādah ibn as-Sāmit (may Allah be pleased with him) and reported that they fought a battle, led by Mu‘āwiyah ibn Abi Sufyān (may Allah be pleased with him and his father), and the Muslims gained a lot of spoils. "Ghanīmah" (spoils): it is everything Muslims take from the disbelievers' properties after overpowering and conquering them. There were silver utensils among the spoils, so Mu‘āwiyah (may Allah be pleased with him) commanded a man to sell them in dirhams as a deferred payment from the people's payments. "U'tiyāt" (payments) is the plural of "u'tiyah", and it refers here to what the country gives the soldiers as a regular payment monthly or annually. This means: He ordered these silver utensils to be sold in dirhams as a deferred payment until the buyers received their salaries. So, people from the army havetened to buy these utensils in return for deferred dirhams until it was time for them to receive their wages. ‘Ubādah ibn as-Sāmit (may Allah be pleased with him), who was present in the army, learned about this, so he stood up and delivered a sermon saying: Verily, I heard the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) forbidding the sale of gold for gold, silver for silver, wheat for wheat, barley for barley, dry dates for dry dates, and salt for salt except equal for equal and like for like, i.e., The Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) forbade selling these similar types in all cases unless they are like for like, i.e., equal in weight, and are visible, and present not absent, as mentioned in the two Sahīh Collections: "Do not sell available money for something absent."
The one who gives excess and the one who asks for it each of them has committed the prohibited Riba (usury), and both are equally sinful.
On hearing this, the people returned the utensils they had taken to the man who had sold them to them. When Mu‘āwiyah (may Allah be pleased with him and his father) heard about the Hadīth that was narrated by ‘Ubādah, he stood up and delivered a sermon saying: "What is the matter with some men?" alluding to what 'Ubādah (may Allah be pleased with him) had said, "narrating from the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) Hadīths that we had not heard from him although we saw" him, i.e., we used to be in his presence and accompany him in his journeys. It seems that Mu‘āwiyah (may Allah be pleased with him) neither heard nor knew about this Hadīth, as was the case with others who did not know about it initially. The fact that he (may Allah be pleased with him) did not hear it does not serve as proof. Thereupon, Ubādah ibn as-Sāmit (may Allah be pleased with him) stood up when Mu‘āwiyah criticized him, and repeated the Hadīth once again and said: "We will surely narrate," i.e., we will surely tell people "what he heard from the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) even if Mu‘āwiyah disliked it," referring to Mu‘āwiyah ibn Abi Sufyān, the army leader, or he said: "Even if it is against his will," i.e., even if he is disgraced and stuck to dust. Then, he said: "I do not mind if I do not accompany him," i.e., I do not care about not accompanying him, and I do not want to be employed among his soldiers, and I want to part with him on a black night, i.e., dark and moonless.
The Hadīth signifies the keenness to convey the Sunnah acts and spread knowledge even if it is against the will of anyone.
It highlights the prohibition of Riba.
It stresses that the truth should be declared even if the one to whom it is declared is senior..

1588
Abu Hurayrah (may Allah be pleased with him) reported that the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) said: Gold for gold, weight for weight, like for like; and silver for silver, weight for weight, like for like. Whoever gives or takes more is engaged in Riba (usury)..

Commentary : Riba (usury) is one of the types of exploitation in transactions. It entails great harm and involves unlawful earnings and taking extra money wrongfully. Therefore, it has been prohibited in all the laws that have been revealed. Riba has various types, all of which are prohibited. Riba al-Fadl (usury of surplus) is one type of it; it means selling an item that is subject to Riba rulings for another of the same kind with excess in one of the two, like selling a gold dinar for two dinars and a silver dirham for two dirhams. Hence, the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) ordered us in this Hadīth to sell gold for gold - whether in the form of gold dinars or others - weight for weight and like for like without addition or reduction, so, both should be similar in weight and equal. Likewise, silver is to be sold for silver - whether in the form of silver dirhams or others - weight for weight and like for like without addition or reduction, so both should be equal in weight. Whoever gives more or takes more has committed unlawful Riba.
Other versions have clarified that if the types vary, then selling with a surplus is permissible; however, the sale should not be for a deferred payment; rather, it should be immediate, as the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) said in the two Sahīh Collections - and this is the wording of Al-Bukhāri -: "And sell gold for silver and silver for gold as you wish." In Sahīh Muslim Collection: "If these classes differ, sell as you wish as long as payment is made hand to hand."
The Hadīth highlights the prohibition of Riba al-Fadl (usury of surplus).
It stresses the prohibition of all transactions that entail harm to people in terms of their properties and relations..

1591
Hanash reported: We were along with Fadālah ibn' Ubayd on an expedition. A necklace made of gold, silver and jewels fell to my and my friends' lot. I wanted to buy it, so I asked Fadālah ibn' Ubayd, at which point he said: Separate its gold and place it in one pan and place your gold in the other pan and do not receive but like for like, as I heard the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) say: Whoever believes in Allah and the Last Day should not take but like for like..

Commentary : Riba (usury) is one of the types of exploitation in transactions. It entails great harm and involves unlawful earnings and taking extra money wrongfully. Therefore, it has been prohibited in all the laws that have been revealed. Riba al-Fadl (usury of surplus) is one of the types of Riba; it means selling an item that is subject to Riba rulings for another of the same type with excess in one of the two, like selling a gold dinar for two dinars and a silver dirham for two dirhams.
In this Hadīth, the Tābi‘i Hanash as-San‘āni narrates that they were with the Companion Fadālah ibn ‘Ubayd (may Allah be pleased with him) on an expedition. A necklace, a piece of women's jewelry worn around the neck, from the spoils fell to his lot along with a group of his companions and it had gold, silver, and jewels like pearls and the like. Hanash wanted to buy it all and take his companions' share, so he asked Fadālah ibn' Ubayd (may Allah be pleased with him) about the ruling and manner of buying it along with everything in it. Thereupon, Fadālah (may Allah be pleased with him) ordered him to remove and separate its gold and place it in a balance pan - where the weighed item is put - and to put his gold on the opposite pan so there would be equality between the two amounts of gold without any surplus, and this could not be known except by separating it from the jewels. Then, he should not take of its gold except for like of his own gold that he deemed a payment for it so that he would not give or take any extra and, thus, engage in unlawful Riba. Likewise, the silver in it should be sold for an equal weight, and other jewels should be sold at their price for cash. He then justified this by saying that he heard the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) say: "Whoever believes in Allah" Who created him and has full faith in Him "and the Last Day", which is the Day of Judgment to which he will return and on which he will receive recompense for his deeds, should not buy gold or silver except like for like in terms of weight without any addition or surplus.
The Hadīth emphasizes the prohibition of Riba, as it linked its prohibition to belief in Allah and the Last Day..