| Hadiths

Bukhari Hadiths 1356
Muslim Hadiths 558

Hadith

1946

Narrated Jaabir ibn ‘Abdullah (may Allah be pleased with him):Allah's Messengerﷺwas on a journey once and saw a crowd of people, and a man was being shaded (by them). He asked, "What is the matter?" They said, "He (the man) is fasting." The Prophet ﷺsaid, "It is not an act of righteousness to fast on a journey."
.

Commentary :
Legal concessionshave been prescribed for those who are not able to abide by the original rulings pertaining to worshipful acts, as a manifestation ofthe divine mercy and kindness conferred by Allah, Exalted is He, on His servants. The status of those who opt for legal concessions must not be undermined, nor should they bereproached for it. Rather, opting for legal concessions in their proper context is held in the same regard as abiding by the original rulings in their proper context,as per the laws of Islam (i.e., none is deemed superior to the other).
In this hadeeth, Jaabir ibn ‘Abdullah Al-Ansaaree(may Allah be pleased with them) narrated that the Messenger of Allahﷺ was once on a journey, and he saw a crowd of people around a man shading him from the sun. The man was drained of energy because of thirst and fatigue. He ﷺasked, "What is the matter? (What happened to him?)" They explained that he was exhausted because he was fasting while traveling and did not avail himself of the legal concession in this regard. Thereupon, the Prophet ﷺinformed them that his actdid not conform with the due obedience andrighteousness to face such hardship, considering that Allah, Exalted is He,had granted legal concession for a traveler to refrain from fasting, whether it was obligatory of voluntary fasting. The legal concession in this regard was revealed in the Quran; Allah, Exalted is He, Says (what means): {…and whoever is ill or on a journey - then an equal number of other days. Allah intends for you ease and does not intend for you hardship.} [Quran 2:185]. The need to avail oneself of the legal concession and refrain from fasting is further emphasized if the traveler is performing Hajj or participating in Jihaad, because both require physical strength.
The permissibility of fasting while travelling as long as one finds the physical strength to endure ithas been deduced from the following hadeeth. Narrated Aboo Al-Dardaa’ (may Allah be pleased with him): “We set out with Allah's Messengerﷺon one of his journeys on a very hot day, and it was so hot that one had to put his hand over his head to protect himself from the burning sun. None of us was fasting except the Prophet ﷺ and Ibn Rawaahah (may Allah be pleased with him).” [Al-Bukhaaree and Muslim].
This hadeeth highlights that the Laws of Islam is founded on ease and facilitation. It also urges Muslims to take it easy on themselves with regard to worship and avail of the legal concessions granted to them by Allah, The Exalted.
.

1947

Narrated Anas ibn Maalik (may Allah be pleased with him):We used to travel with the Prophet ﷺand neither did the fasting persons criticize those who were not fasting, nor did those who were not fasting criticize the fasting ones.
.

Commentary :
Concessionsinworship have been prescribedfor those who are not able to abide by the original rulings,as a manifestation ofthe divine mercy and kindness conferred by Allah, Exalted is He, on His servants.
The status of those who opt for these legal concessions must not be undermined, nor should they be reproached for it. Rather, opting for legal concessions in their proper context is held in the same regardas abiding by the original rulings in their proper context as per the laws of Islam (i.e., none is held superior to the other).
In this hadeeth, Anas ibn Maalik (may Allah be pleased with him) related that they used to travel with the Prophet ﷺ and neither did the fasting persons criticize those who were not fasting, availing themselves of the legal concession, nor did those who were not fasting criticize the fasting ones, who chose to abide by the original ruling. Both options are prescribed for the traveler, to best suit the different conditions of people during travel. Whoever is able to fast should do so, and whoever is unable to fast should avail himself of the legal concession,and there is no harm in that.
The legal concession in this regard was revealed in the Quran; Allah, Exalted is He, Says (what means): {…and whoever is ill or on a journey - then an equal number of other days. Allah intends for you ease and does not intend for you hardship.} [Quran 2:185]. The need to avail oneself of the legal concession and refrain from fasting is further emphasized if the traveler is performing Hajj or participating in Jihaad, because both require physical strength.
This hadeeth instructs Muslims not to give in to anger or object to what is permissible and prescribed.
It is also deduced therefrom that the Companions (may Allah be pleased with them) were considerate with one another and knowledgeable of both legal concessions and original rulings.
It is also inferred thathavingknowledge of Laws of Islam provisions prevents disagreement among Muslims..

1949

Narrated Naafi‘ narrated that Ibn ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him)recited the ayah: "They had a choice either to fast or to feed a poor person for every day and said that the ayah was abrogated.
.

Commentary :
Fasting is one of the pillars of Islam, and the Quranand the Sunnah have clarified all its general provisions. The obligation of fasting in Islam has gone through gradual legislative stages, and the Companions (may Allah be pleased with them) reported to us the key features of these stages.
In this report, Naafi’,the freed slave of ‘AbdullahIbn ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him),from the Taabi‘oon, informed us that ‘Abdullah(may Allah be pleased with him)recited the words of Allah, Exalted is He, (which mean): {And upon those who are able [to fast, but with hardship] - a ransom [as substitute] of feeding a poor person [each day].} [Quran 2:184].However, he (may Allah be pleased with him) recited it as “feeding poor persons [each day],” in the plural rather than, “feeding a poor person [each day],”which is one of the approved ten modes of recitation confirmed by Tawaatur (i.e., by collectively contiguous narrations transmitted by a large group of trustworthy narrators, generation after generation, and it is absolutely impossible for them to agree on a lie). It means thatwhoever is unable to fastmust feed one poor person for each missed fast day. At the early legislative stages, it was prescribed for a Muslim to pay this ransom and refrain from fasting in Ramadan, even if he was physically able to fast. Then, Ibn ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him) clarified that the ayahabout the ransom was abrogated and the relevant ruling was abrogated as well, yet it remained in the Quran (its wording was not abrogated). The ruling was abrogated by the ayah that reads (what means): {So whoever sights [the new moon of] the month, let him fast it.} [Quran 2:185].Thus, whoever was able to fast became obliged to observe fasting during Ramadan.
On the other hand, Ibn ‘Abbaas (may Allah be pleased with them) held a different opinion in this regard. It has been narrated on the authority of ‘Ataa’ ibn Aboo Rabaah, from the Taabi‘oon, that he heard ‘Abdullah ibn ‘Abbaas (may Allah be pleased with them) reciting the ayahthat reads (what means): {And upon those who are able [to fast, but with hardship] - a ransom [as substitute] of feeding a poor person [each day].} [Quran 2:184]. Ibn ‘Abbaas said: “This ayah was not abrogated. It rather refers to the old people who cannot endure fasting; it is allowable for them to pay the prescribed ransom instead, feeding one poor person for each fast day.”
He (may Allah be pleased with him) held that the ruling pertaining to the ransom was not abrogated, but rather that it was applicable to old people who were unable to fast.
The hadeeth affirms the abrogation of some ayaat of the Quran.
.

1950

‘Aa’ishah(may Allah be pleased with her)said:
Sometimes I missed some fast days of Ramadan, but could not fast in lieu of them (i.e., make up for them) except in the month of Sha‘baan." Yahya, a sub-narrator said: "She (may Allah be pleased with her)used to be busy serving the Prophet ﷺ.”
.

Commentary :
Fasting is one of the pillars of Islam. The Quran and the Sunnah haveclarified all its general provisions. For instance, the Sunnah clarified that if a woman gets her period in Ramadan, it is incumbent on her to refrain from fastinguntil her periodends and she attains ritual purity.Furthermore, she is required to make up for the missed fast days later on. ‘Aa’ishah (may Allah be pleased with her)stated that she would sometimes miss out fast days of Ramadan due to menstruation or for other valid excusesand could not make up for them except in the month of Sha’baan of the following year.
Yahya ibnSa’eed Al-Ansaaree, one of the narrators of hadeeth,clarified that what was preventing her from making up for the missed fast days earlier was that she (may Allah be pleased with her) was busy with the service of the Prophet ﷺ,meaning that she (may Allah be pleased with her)keenly ensured that she could always fulfill the Prophet’s right to sexual enjoyment with her. This was the attitude of all the Prophet’s wives, being keen on keeping him happy and satisfied. They would even abstain from seeking his permission to observe fastingfor fear that he ﷺmight have wanted to engage in sexual intercourse with one of them on that day, but would give her the permission to fast, giving precedence to her wish over his desire and need.As for the month of Sha‘baan, he ﷺ used to observe fasting almost all month long,and therefore they would conveniently have the chance to make up for the missed fast days or feel free to ask for his permission to observe fasting,since there would be no other available time to make up for those fast days. This falls under the category of availing oneself of a legal concession orthe less strict scholarly view, because a woman is given the choice to make up for the missed fast days at any time during the year till the following Ramadan.
It is also deduced from the hadeeth that honoring and fulfilling the husband’s rights over his wife is given precedenceover other rights, time-bound religious obligations aside.
It also highlights the ease and facilitation fostered by Islamin making up for the missed fast days of Ramadanfor- an excuse which is acceptable in the Laws of Islam.
It is also inferred from the hadeeth that it is allowable for a Muslim to delay making up for the missed fast days of Ramadan for a valid excuse or for no excuse at all.
.

1952

‘Narrated Aa’ishah (may Allah be pleased with her):Allah's Messengerﷺsaid, "Whoever died and he ought to have fasted (the missed fast days of Ramadan) then his guardians must fast (i.e., make up for them) on his behalf."
.

Commentary :
Fasting is one of the pillars of Islam. The Quran and the Sunnah haveclarified all its general provisions, and the noble Companions(may Allah be pleased with them)have reported thatfor us.
In this hadeeth, the Prophet ﷺmade it clear that if a person dies before making up for the missed obligatory fasting, whether due to avow, expiation, or missed fast days of Ramadan,even though he was able to fast,, his guardian, i.e., any of his relatives, whether he\she was among his heirs or not, should make up for the missed obligatory fast days on his behalf, and it wouldbe sufficient in terms of clearing the dead person’s liability from the obligation in this regard.
However, if someone dies before making up for the missed obligatory fasting for a valid excuse, e.g., a disease that befell him until his death, he shall bear no sin for that and his guardians are not required to make up for the missed fast days, given the general indication of the ayah reading (that which means): {…and whoever is ill or on a journey - then an equal number of other days. Allah intends for you ease and does not intend for you hardship and [wants] for you to complete the period and to glorify Allah for that [to] which He has guided you; and perhaps you will be grateful.} [Quran 2:185].
In this ayah, Allah, Exalted is He, enjoins upon the person to make up for the missed fast days on other days. If a sick person dies before recovery, he is cleared from the obligation of making up for the missed fast days and the ransom (feeding a poor person for each missed fast day), because feeding these poor people is an alternative to fasting. If fasting is no longer deemed obligatory, the same goes for feeding as well.
However, if someone does not make up for the missed fast days out of neglect, without having a valid excuse, and dies, it is not incumbent on his guardians to make up for the missed fast days, and it is not valid if they did, because the prescribed time window for making up for the missed fasting has expired.
This hadeeth alsoteaches us keenness in fulfilling the rights of Allah, Exalted is He, over us, and urges us to maintain ties of kinship.
.

1953

Narrated Ibn ‘Abbaas (may Allah be pleased with him): A man cameto the Prophet ﷺand said, "O Allah's Messenger!My mother died and she ought to have fasted one month (for her missed Ramadan). Shall I fast on her behalf?" The Prophet ﷺreplied in the affirmative and said, "The debt owed to Allah is more deserving (of being paid off)."
In another narration a woman is reported to have said, "My sister died..." Narrated Ibn `Abbas: A woman said to the Prophet ﷺ: “My mother died and she had vowed to fast but she did not fast.” In another narration Ibn ‘Abbaas is reported to have said, "A woman said to the Prophet ﷺ, "My mother died while she ought to have fasted for fifteen days."
.

Commentary :
Fasting is one of the pillars of Islam.The Quran and the Sunnah haveclarified all its general provisions, and the noble Companions (may Allah be pleased with them)have reported that for us.
In this hadeeth, ‘AbdullahNarrated Ibn ‘Abbaas (may Allah be pleased with him) that a man came to the Prophet ﷺand told him that his mother had died before making up for a missed month of fasting, whether it was the obligatory fasting of Ramadan, or an obligatory fasting due to a vow or expiation.He asked if it would be sufficient for him to make up for the missed fasting on her behalf? (Will it clear her liability from this obligation?) The Prophet ﷺ repliedin the affirmative and instructed him tomake up for the missed fasting on her behalf, upon which her liability would be cleared.Afterwards, he ﷺ drew an analogy between the repayment of the dead person’s debts andhow this clears his liability, andthe repayment of the debts owed to Allah, Exalted is He, i.e., the missed fasting. He ﷺ added: “The debt owed to Allah, Exalted is He, is more deserving of being repaid,” and it is more deserving of being repaid and more likelyto be accepted.
Some versions of the hadeeth, like the one cited in Saheeh Muslim, state that a woman came to the Prophet ﷺ asking him the same regarding her mother. It is possible that these were two different incidents.
If a person dies before making up for missed obligatory fasting, and he was able to make up for it, but did not until death befell him, his guardian, i.e., any of his relatives (whether he\she was among his heirs or not), may make up for the missed obligatory fast days on his behalf.This would be sufficient in terms of clearing the dead person’s liability from the obligation.Otherwise, he may feed a poor person for each missed fast day instead.
However, if someone dies before making up for the missed obligatory fasting for a valid excuse, e.g., a disease that befell him until his death, he shall bear no sin for that, and his guardians are not required to make up for the missed fast days, given the general indication of the ayah’s wording, which reads (what means): {…and whoever is ill or on a journey - then an equal number of other days.} [Quran 2:185]. In this ayah, Allah, Exalted is He,stated thatit is obligatory on such a person to make up for the missed fast days on other days. If a sick person dies before attaining recovery, his liability is cleared from the obligation of making up for the missed fast days and the ransom (feeding a poor person for each missed fast day), because feeding poor people here is an alternative to fasting. If fasting is no longer deemed obligatory, the same goes for feeding the poor as well.
The hadeeth encourages us to show keenness in fulfilling the rights of Allah, Exalted is He, over us, and in showing the enjoined dutifulness towards parents after their death.
The permissibility of acting upon Qiyaas (i.e., legal analogy) is also inferred from the hadeeth.
.

1955

Narrated ‘Abdullah ibn Aboo Awfaa(may Allah be pleased with him):We were once in the company of the Prophet ﷺ on a journey and he ﷺwas fasting. When the sun set, he ﷺaddressed somebody: "O so-and-so, get up and mix some Saweeq with water (i.e., prepare barley beverage\ liquid meal) for us." He replied, "O Allah's Messenger! Will you wait till it is evening?" The Prophet ﷺsaid, "Get down and mix Saweeq with water for us." He replied, "O Allah's Messenger ﷺ! If you wait till the evening!" The Prophet ﷺ said again, "Get down and mix Saweeq with water for us." He replied, “It is still daytime!” The Prophet ﷺsaid again, "Get down and mix Saweeq with water for us." He finally got down and mixed Saweeq for them. The Prophet ﷺ drank it and then said, "When you see night falling from this side, i.e., indicating sunset, a fasting person should (hasten to) break his fast.".

Commentary :
It is known that all good lies in following the guidance of the Prophet ﷺ and sheer evil lies in introducing religious innovations.Being one of the loftiest worshipful acts and best means to draw closer to Allah, Exalted is He, it is incumbent upon a Muslim to follow the guidance of the Prophet ﷺ regarding fasting, and he ﷺ urged the fasting people to hasten in breaking their fasts.
In this hadeeth, ‘Abdullah ibn Aboo Awfaa(may Allah be pleased with him) narrated that they went once on a journey with the Prophet ﷺwhen he was fasting. After sunset, heﷺ commanded a man to mix some Saweeq with water(i.e., prepare a liquid meal bymixing roasted barley flour with milk or water), for them to break their fast.The man thought that it was early to break the fast then, and therefore said to the Prophet ﷺ: “O Messenger of Allah! If you wait till the evening,”meaning to wait longer to ensure that the time of sunset had come. However, the Prophet ﷺ repeated his command twice and the man gave him the same answer! On the third time, the man said to the Prophet ﷺ: “It is still daytime!” He thought that the sun had not yet set because he could still see daylightand assumed that the fast day had not ended yet.It is possible that he saw strongdaylight due to the clear sky, so he thought that the sun had not set, or perhaps he assumed that the sunlight was merely blocked by a mountain or clouds or the like. Had he understood that sunset had already taken place,he would not have been reluctant to comply with the Prophet’s ﷺcommand, which would have constituted disobedience. Rather, he merely wanted to investigate the matter further to be on the safe side and ensure that he had abided by the relevant Laws of Islamruling. On the fourth time, the man did as he was ordered by the Prophet ﷺ, whodrank the barley meal and then instructed people that whenever the sun sets and they can see night falling from the east, marking the end of the day and the beginning of the night, a fasting person should break his fast.
A fasting person is urged to hasten to break his fast directly after sunset so as not to increasedaytime at the expense of nighttime, and because it is more convenient and kinder for the fasting person, andimplies availing oneself of the relevant legal concession and expressing more gratitude to Allah for His blessings.
It is deduced from the hadeeth that it is allowable toreminda scholar of what he might have forgotten, and the practice of refrainingfrom doing so after the third time.
It is also inferred that it is permissible to observe fasting while travelling, and that it is betterand more virtuous than refrainment from fasting, as long as it does not cause apparent hardship for the fasting person.
In addition, it is deduced from the hadeeth that a religious command has more (authoritative) weight than sensory judgment (and conclusions), and that the Laws of Islam must be given precedence over intellectual judgment..

1957

Sahl ibn Sa‘d(may Allah be pleased with him) narrated that Allah's Messenger ﷺ said, "People will remain on the right path as long as they hasten to break their fast.".

1959

Aboo Usaamah narrated on the authority of Hishaam ibn ‘Urwah narrating on the authority of Faatimah (may Allah be pleased with her) that Asmaa’ bint Aboo Bakr (may Allah be pleased with them) said, "We broke our fast during the lifetime of the Prophet ﷺ on a cloudy day and then the sun appeared." Hishaam was asked, "Were they ordered to fast in lieu of that day?" He replied, "It had to be made up for (i.e., making up for it is inevitable)." Ma‘mar said, "I heard Hishaam saying, "I do not know whether they fasted in lieu of that day or not.".

1960

Al-Rubay‘ bint Mu‘awwidh (may Allah be pleased with her) narrated:
"The Prophet ﷺ sent a messenger to the village of the Ansaar in the morning of the Day of ‘Aashooraa’ (10th of Muharram) to announce: 'Whoever has eaten something should not eat but complete the fast, and whoever is observing fast should complete it.' She (may Allah be pleased with her) further said, "Since then we used to fast on that day regularly and also make our boys fast. We used to make toys of wool for the boys and if anyone of them cried for food, he was given those toys till it was time to break the fast.".

Commentary :
The Day of ‘Aashooraa’ is a blessed day, on which Allah, Exalted is He, saved His Prophet Moosaa from Pharaoh and his army. The Messenger of Allah ﷺ fasted it, and commanded Muslims to fast as well, to express their gratitude to Allah, Exalted is He.
In this hadeeth, Al-Rubay‘ bint Mu‘awwidh (may Allah be pleased with her)related that the Prophet ﷺ once sent his messengers on the morning of the Day of ‘Aashooraa’, the tenth of Muharram, to the villages of Al-Madeenah. They called out to the people, “Whoever has eaten something should not eat, but complete the fast, and whoever is observing fast should complete it.”
Then, she (may Allah be pleased with her) stated that since then they used to fast on the Day of ‘Aashooraa’ regularly and also made their young boys fast. They used to make them toys of dyed wool and if anyone of them cried for food, he was given those toys to be distracted by them till it was time to break the fast, to encourage and train young children in performing worshipful acts.
It has been reported in Saheeh Al-Bukhaaree and Saheeh Muslim that the Prophet ﷺ deemed fasting on the Day of ‘Aashooraa’ optional after the obligatory fasting ofRamadan was prescribed. It was narrated on the authority of Ibn ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him) that he ﷺ said: “That was a day on which the people of pre-Islamic days used to observe fast. So, heamongst you who likes to observe fast should do so, and he who does not like it should abandon it.” [Al-Bukhaaree and Muslim].
He ﷺ commanded them to fast on it as a voluntary act of worship.
The merits of this blessed day have been reported in many texts of the Sunnah. For instance, it has been narrated that fasting it expiates the sins committed in the previous year, as narrated on the authority of Aboo Qataadah (may Allah be pleased with him) and recorded in Saheeh Muslim.
The permissibility of training young children in fasting can be inferred from the hadeeth.
It is also deduced therefrom that when any of the Companions (may Allah be pleased with them) says, “We used to do such-and-such during the lifetime of the Prophet ﷺ,” such a report is considered Marfoo‘ (i.e., a Hadeeth that is directly attributed to the Prophet ﷺ), because the fact that he ﷺ did not disapprove their act serves as a tacit approval of it on his part, otherwise he ﷺ would have forbidden them from such an act.
.

1968

Aboo Juhayfah (may Allah be pleased with him) narrated:
The Prophet ﷺ established a bond of brotherhood between Salmaan and Aboo Al-Dardaa’ (may Allah be pleased with them). Salmaan once paid a visit to his brother Aboo Al-Dardaa’ and found his wife, Umm Al-Dardaa’, dressed in shabby clothes. He inquired about her state, and she replied, “Your brother Aboo Al-Dardaa’ is not interested in (the luxuries of) this worldly life!” In the meantime, Aboo Al-Dardaa’ came and prepared a meal for Salmaan, who requested Aboo Al- Dardaa’ to eat (with him), but he said, "I am fasting." Thereupon, Salmaan said, “I am not going to eat unless you eat with me!” So, Aboo Al-Dardaa’ ate (with Salmaan). When it was night and (a part of the night passed), Aboo Al-Dardaa’ got up (to offer night prayer), but Salmaan told him to sleep and Aboo Al-Dardaa’ complied. After sometime, Aboo Al-Dardaa’ again got up but Salmaan told him to sleep longer. When it was the last hours of the night, Salmaan told him to get up then, and both of them offered night prayer. Salmaan told Aboo Al-Dardaa’ (may Allah be pleased with them), "Your Lord has a right on you, your self has a right on you, and your family has a right on you; give everyone who has a right over you his due right!" Aboo Al-Dardaa’ went to the Prophet ﷺ and reported to him the whole story. The Prophet ﷺ said, "Salmaan has spoken the truth.".

Commentary :
Allah, Exalted is He, did not enjoin Muslims to devote their lives exclusively to worship; monasticism is not prescribed in Islam, contrary to the Christians who invented monasticism and added it to their religion.
In this hadeeth, Aboo Juhayfah,Wahab ibn ‘Abdullah Al-Suwaa’i (may Allah be pleased with him)narrated that the Prophet ﷺ established a bond of brotherhood between Salmaan Al-Faarsi and Aboo Al-Dardaa’ ‘Umayr ibn Qays Al-Ansaaree(may Allah be pleased with them). It is noteworthy that this was a different kind of brotherhood bond than the one that was first established by the Prophet ﷺ between the emigrants and Al-Ansaar after the migration to Al-Madeenah, which entitled brothers to inherit from each other at first and was abrogated later on. Rather, it was more of a moral bond. One day, Salmaan Al-Faarisi visited his brother Aboo Al-Dardaa’ (may Allah be pleased with them) and found his wife Umm Al-Dardaa’, Khayrah bint Aboo Hadrid Al-Aslameeyyah (may Allah be pleased with her) wearing shabby clothes, of the type usually worn by women while carrying out the household chores, instead of wearing fancy clothes and beautifying herself for her husband. Salmaan inquired about her state and she replied, “Your brother Aboo Al-Dardaa’ is not interested in (the luxuries of) this worldly life!” Her statement was meant as a euphemism for his refrainment from approaching her; she felt bashful to say it explicitly. This visit took place before the obligation of Hijaab was prescribed for Muslim women. Afterward, Aboo Al-Dardaa’ came and prepared some food for Salmaan, who asked Aboo Al-Dardaa’ to join him and eat with him, but he informed him that he was fasting. However, Salmaan insisted that he should join him and said: “I am not going to eat unless you eat with me!” Therefore, Aboo Al-Dardaa’ ate with Salmaan, whose aim was to forbid Aboo Al-Dardaa’ from overburdening himself with worship to the extent of harming his wife! Aboo Al-Dardaa’ complied and ate with Salmaan (may Allah be pleased with them).
Salmaan spent the night with them. When a part of the night passed, Aboo Al-Dardaa’ got up to offer night prayers, but Salmaan commanded him to sleep and Aboo Al-Dardaa’ complied. After sometime, Aboo Al-Dardaa’ got up again but Salmaan commanded him to sleep longer. When it got to the last hours of the night, Salmaan told him to get up then, and both of them offered night prayer. Salmaan advised Aboo Al-Dardaa’ (may Allah be pleased with them) and clarified to him that Allah, Exalted is He, had a right over him, his body and health had rights over him, and his family and children had rights over him; such as showing kindness and intimacy to his wife, tending to the needs of his wife and children, and teaching them what benefits them in this worldly life and the Hereafter. He then commanded Aboo Al-Daraa’ to give everyone who had a right over him his due right.
Later on, Aboo Al-Dardaa’ went to the Prophet ﷺ and reported to him the whole story. The Prophet ﷺ said, "Salmaan has spoken the truth."
This hadeeth serves as evidence for the fact that a person should not overburden himself with fasting and night prayer (beyond his abilities), but should rather pray and perform night prayer moderately to attain the desired benefit (gain reward) and avoid fatigue, difficulty, and hardship.
It is also deduced from the hadeeth that it is permissible to establish bonds of brotherhood between Muslims, and that it is allowable to visit one’s friends and brothers in faith and spend the night in their houses.
The permissibility of talking to a non-Mahram (marriageable) woman for a valid need and offering advice to one’s fellow Muslim brothers can also be inferred from the hadeeth.
The hadeeth also highlights the virtues of performing night prayer in the last hours of the night.
Furthermore, it is also deduced therefrom that it recommended acts may be deemed forbidden for someone if it is feared that they may cause boredom and tedium, and lead him to neglect the enjoined fulfillment of the rights due over him.
The hadeeth underlines that it is disliked to overburden oneself with worship.
It is also deduced from the hadeeth that it is allowable to break a voluntary fast for a need and interest.
It is also inferred therefrom that it is permissible for a woman to beautify herself for her husband.
Finally, the hadeeth also highlights the merits of Salmaan Al-Faarisi (may Allah be pleased with him), since the Prophet ﷺ approved his act and stated that he spoke the truth.
.

1969

‘Aa’ishah (may Allah be pleased with her) said:
Allah's Messenger ﷺ used to fast till one would say that he would never stop fasting (on that month), and he would refrain from fasting till one would say that he would never fast (on that month). I never saw Allah's Messenger ﷺ fasting for a whole month except the month of Ramadan, and did not see him fast in any month more than he fasted in the month of Sha‘baan..

Commentary :
Perseverance in performing righteous deeds regularly leads a servant of Allah to attain divine mercy and deliverance from the Hellfire. The Prophet ﷺ was the optimal role model in this regard. He ﷺ persevered in performing acts of worship and acts of obedience regularly; one of such acts was voluntary fasting, which is not bound to a specific time.
In this hadeeth, ‘Aa’ishah (may Allah be pleased with her) informed us that the Prophet ﷺ sometimes observed fasting most of a month, so much that they thought that he ﷺ was going to fast the whole month, and sometimes refrained from fasting on a month so much that they thought that he ﷺ was not going to observe fasting on that month at all. He ﷺ did not fast an entire month except Ramadan, because it is obligatory, and it was mentioned in the hadeeth to emphasize this fact. The only month he ﷺ fasted in full was Ramadan, so that voluntary fasting in any other month would not be mistakenly believed to be obligatory. He ﷺ observed fasting most of Sha‘baan, but did not fast it in full lest people should mistakenly assume that it was obligatory, and to distinguish it from the obligatory fasting ofRamadan. He ﷺ often fastedin Sha‘baan in particular because deeds are presented to Allah, Exalted is He, in the month of Sha‘baan, and he ﷺ loved to have his deeds presented to Him while he ﷺ was fasting.
Furthermore, people often neglect that month, being in between two significant months, i.e., Rajab and Ramadan, as stated in a hadeeth cited by Al-Nasaa’i and Ahmad.
It is deduced from the hadeeth that the voluntary acts of worship are not bound to specific times, but may be performed at any time based on the willingness and ability of the doers.
The hadeeth also highlights the virtues of Sha’baan, and encourages Muslims to fast during it more often. It is also deduced from the hadeeth that it is allowable to observe voluntary fasting on only one or a few days each month. .

1973

Humayd narrated that he asked Anas (may Allah be pleased with him) about the fasting of the Prophet ﷺ. He (may Allah be pleased with him) said "Whenever I liked to see the Prophet ﷺ fasting in any given month, I could see that, and whenever I liked to see him not fasting, I could see that too, and if I liked to see him praying in any given night, I could see that, and if I liked to see him sleeping, I could see that, too." Anas (may Allah be pleased with him) further said, "I never touched silk or velvet softer than the hand of Allah's Messenger ﷺ and never smelled musk or perfumed smoke more pleasant than the smell of the Messenger ﷺ.".

Commentary :
Perseverance in performing righteous deeds regularly leads a servant of Allah to attain divine mercy and deliverance from the Hellfire. The Prophet ﷺ was the optimal role model in this regard. He ﷺ preserved in performing worshipful acts and acts of obedience regularly, and among such acts were voluntary fasting and night prayer.
Humayd, from the Taabi‘oon (Followers), informed us in this hadeeth that he asked Anas ibn Maalik (may Allah be pleased with him) about the fasting of the Prophet ﷺ, and he replied that whenever he wished to see the Prophet ﷺ observing fasting or refraining from it on any given day of the month, he could, and whenever he wished to see him performing night prayers or sleeping at any given time of the night, he could. This means that he ﷺ used to observe fasting often on some days of the month and refrain from fasting on others, and used to divide his night between sleep to get rest (i.e., fulfill the rights of his body over him) and worship (i.e., fulfill the rights of Allah, Exalted is He, over him).
Afterward, Anas (may Allah be pleased with him)described some of the distinct physical qualities of the Prophet ﷺ. He said that he never touched silk or velvet softer than the hand of Allah's Messenger ﷺ and never smelled musk or perfumed smoke (i.e., ‘Abeer, which is a blend of beautiful and sweet scents) more pleasant than his smell. He ﷺ was endowed with the most perfect moral and physical qualities, and Allah, Exalted is He, singled him out for these distinct qualities so that his perfected outward appearance would mirror and further refine his perfected inner character.
It is deduced from the hadeeth that the Prophet ﷺ adhered to moderation in worship; he ﷺ did not observe fasting all year long, nor did he pray all night long, so as not to overburden himself and his nation with worship, lest they should follow his example in this regard,which would be unfair to them (i.e., since they cannot stand what he ﷺ could).
The hadeeth also highlights some distinct physical qualities of the Prophet ﷺ and that he ﷺ was endowed with a pleasant outward appearance (and good looks).
The hadeeth encourages Muslims to perform night prayer and observe voluntary fasting.
.

1982

Anas (may Allah be pleased with him) said:
The Prophet ﷺ paid a visit to Umm Sulaym once and she placed before him dates and ghee. The Prophet ﷺsaid, "Put the ghee and dates in their respective containers for I am fasting." Then, he ﷺ stood somewhere in her house and offered voluntary prayer and then invoked Allah, Exalted is He, to bless Umm Sulaym and her family with all that is good. Then Umm Sulaym said, "O Allah's Messenger ﷺ! I have a special request (today)." He ﷺ said, "What is it?" She replied, "(Please invoke Allah for) your servant Anas." Thereupon, he ﷺ did not leave anything good in the worldly life or the Hereafter which he did not invoke (Allah to bestow) on me and said, “O Allah! Bless him (i.e., Anas) with abundant wealth and offspring!”
Anas (may Allah be pleased with him) added: “Therefore, I was one of the richest among the Ansaar and my daughter Umaynah told me that when Al-Hajjaaj came to Basrah, more than 120 of my offspring had been buried..

Commentary :
The Prophet ﷺ used to honor his Companions (may Allah be pleased with them) and visit them from time to time, to check on their conditions and supplicate Allah, Exalted is He, to bless them and their families and bestow upon them all that is good, as stated in this hadeeth.
Narrated Anas ibn Maalik (may Allah be pleased with him) that the Prophet ﷺ once visited his mother Umm Sulaym (may Allah be pleased with them) and that she served him some dates and ghee to show hospitality to him. However, he ﷺ apologized and informed her that he was observing voluntary fasting, and asked her to put the dates and ghee back in their containers. Afterwards, he ﷺstood somewhere in her house, offered a two-Rak‘ah voluntary prayer and then invoked Allah, Exalted is He, to bless her and her family with all that is good. The Companions (may Allah be pleased with them) often asked the Prophet ﷺ to pray in their homes and supplicate Allah, Exalted is He, for them. Then, Umm Sulaym (may Allah be pleased with her) informed the Prophet ﷺ that she had a special request. He ﷺ inquired about her request and she told him that she wanted him to supplicate Allah, Exalted is He, in favor of her son Anas, who was the Prophet’s ﷺservant. Thereupon, he ﷺ supplicated Allah, Exalted is He, to bless him with abundant wealth and offspring.
The version of the hadeeth cited in Saheeh Muslim reads: “He ﷺ he invoked blessings for me (that I should be blessed with) all that is good and this was what he ﷺ (said) at the end of what be supplicated for me: “O Allah, grant him wealth and progeny, and confer blessings (upon him) in (each one) of them.’” [Muslim].
The Prophet’s ﷺsupplication was answered as indicated by the words of Anas (may Allah be pleased with him) when he said: “I was one of the richest people from the Ansaar and my daughter Umaynah told me that when Al-Hajjaaj ibn Yusuf Al-Thaqfi came to Basrah, in 75 A.H., more than 120 of my descendants (i.e., the children of my sons and daughters) had been buried.” Anas (may Allah be pleased with him) was about eighty years old at that time, and he died in 93 A.H. when he was nearly a hundred years old!
It is inferred from the hadeeth that being blessed with abundant wealth and offspring could be an aspect of the goodness, blessing, and prosperity conferred upon a servant of Allah, Exalted is He. He ﷺ would not have supplicated Allah for Anas (may Allah be pleased with him) except with what was good for him with regards to his religiosity and worldly affairs.
It is also deduced from the hadeeth that it is allowable to supplicate Allah, Exalted is He, for abundant wealth and offspring.
The hadeeth also highlights the Prophet’s ﷺhumbleness and kindness towards his Companions (may Allah be pleased with them), and it is deduced therefrom that a ruler may visit the ruled to check on their conditions.
The hadeeth also emphasizes the merits of Anas (may Allah be pleased with him).
Among other lessons inferred from the hadeeth are the following: putting one’s child before oneself (i.e., Umm Sulaym asked the Prophet ﷺ to supplicate Allah for Anas rather than herself), and kindness in presenting requests. It is also deduced that the death of a great number of his descendants does not contradict the fact that the Prophet’s ﷺsupplications to bless him with abundant offspring was answered.
The hadeeth also emphasizes the permissibility of showing hospitality to guests and honoring them.
It is also inferred therefrom that it is allowable to turn down a gift as long as it would not cause hardship for the gift-giver, and that he should explain the reason to him.
The hadeeth urges Muslims to preserve food and refrain from wasting.
It also shows that if a guest will not eat from the food served to him by the host, he should considerately supplicate Allah, Exalted is He, in his favor to make him feel better.
Finally, it also encourages Muslims to supplicate Allah, Exalted is He, for all that is good in the worldly life and the Hereafter, because all good lies in the Hands of Allah, Exalted is He, and to proclaim and celebrateHis blessings bestowed upon us..

1983

Mutarrif narrated on the authority of ‘Imraan ibn Husayn (may Allah be pleased with him):
That the Prophet ﷺ asked him (‘Imraan) or asked a man and ‘Imraan was listening, "O Aboo so-and-so! Have you fasted the last days of this month?" (The narrator thought that he ﷺ said, "the month of Ramadan"). The man replied, "No, O Allah's Messenger ﷺ!" The Prophet ﷺ said to him, "When you finish your fasting (of Ramadan) fast two days (in Shawwaal)." Through another chain of narration, ‘Imraan said, "The Prophet ﷺ said, ‘(Have you fasted) the last days of Sha‘baan?’".

Commentary :
The Prophet ﷺ used to fast more often in the month of Sha’baan, and he ﷺ urged his Companions (may Allah be pleased with them) to fast during it.
In this hadeeth the Companion ‘Imraan ibn Husayn (may Allah be pleased with him) related that the Prophet ﷺ asked him once - or he asked another man while ‘Imraan was listening. Mutarrif ibn ‘Abdullah ibn Al-Shikhkheer, one of the narrators of the hadeeth, it was unsure. He ﷺ said: "O Aboo so-and-so! Have you fasted the last days of this month?" The Arabic word used in the hadeeth is ‘Sarar’ meaning the last days of the month, and the word linguistically denotes the concealment of the moon during these days, i.e., the twenty-eighth, twenty-ninth, and thirtieth nights (if the month is thirty days). It has also been said that the word refers to the three ‘white’ days in the middle of the month, namely, the thirteenth, fourteenth, and fifteenth of the lunar month.
He ﷺ commanded him to make up for those fast days after ‘Eid Al-Fitr and the end of the Ramadan fast, to observe the acts of worship he habitually performed, because the most endeared deed to Allah, Exalted is He, is the one performed regularly.
Aboo Al-Nu’maan Muhammad ibn Al-Fadhl Al-Sadoosi (the narrator of the hadeeth) said: “I think he said: ‘He ﷺ meant Ramadan.’” However, the mention of Ramadan here is a mistake in the narration because it is incumbent on Muslims to fast duringRamadan. It could also be in reference to the time when he ﷺ made that statement and not the fasting that the addressee did not observe, conforming to the version of the hadeeth cited in Saheeh Muslim reading: “Fast for two days instead of (one fast) when you have completed (the fast of) Ramadan.” The question was about fasting on the last days of Sha‘baan. If the intended meaning of the hadeeth’s wording is the last days of the month, this means that this hadeeth seemingly contradicts the authentic hadeeth reported about the prohibition of fasting one or two days before Ramadan. This can be explained by the assumption that this man habitually fasted the last days of the lunar month, and abstained from fasting them merely for fear of the reported prohibition of fasting one or two days before Ramadan. Therefore, the Prophet ﷺ made it clear to him that the prohibition in this regard does not apply to habitual or vowed fasting on these days, but rather that what is prohibited is singling them out for fasting.
It is deduced from this hadeeth that it is permissible to make up for missed voluntary fasting.
The hadeeth also shows that the Prophet ﷺ used to advise his Companions (may Allah be pleased with them) and urge them to perform acts of obedience..

1552

Jābir ibn ‘Abdullāh reported: The Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) entered an orchard upon ’Umm Ma‘bad and said: O ’Umm Ma‘bad, who planted these palm trees, a Muslim or a disbeliever? She said: Rather, a Muslim. He said: No Muslim plants a plant wherefrom a man, an animal, or a bird eats except that it will be counted for him as a charity until the Day of Judgment..

Commentary : Islam has encouraged all types of righteous and good acts and has made them worthy of reward and recompense. One of these righteous acts promoted by Islam is doing whatever entails goodness and benefit for human beings and animals.
In this Hadīth, Jābir ibn ‘Abdullāh (may Allah be pleased with him and his father) narrates that the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) entered "an orchard," i.e., a garden of palm trees, and ’Umm Ma‘bad was in that orchard. It is said: She is the wife of Zayd ibn Hārithah. The Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) asked her about the one who planted the palm trees in that orchard, whether he was a Muslim or a disbeliever. She informed him that the one who planted it was a Muslim. Thereupon, the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) said: "No Muslim plants a plant," i.e., cultivates plants, "wherefrom a man, an animal, or a bird eats" he (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) mentioned them in general to include all living beings in the sea and on land, "except that it will be counted for him as a charity until the Day of Judgment" because of eating from what he has planted, as long as the benefit of such plants remains even if it remains until the Day of Judgment. The Muslim was mentioned in particular because he mostly plants with the intention that Muslims would gain strength from the fruits of such a plant to worship Allah Almighty and because the Muslim is the one who gets a reward. In contrast, the disbeliever does not get a reward for his good deeds, which might only alleviate his punishment, or he might be provided with food and thus be repaid in this world.
The Hadīth indicates that rewards in the Hereafter for good deeds are exclusive to Muslims and not for the disbelievers.
It also points out the merit of agriculture and cultivation given their effect in populating the earth and benefitting all creatures.
It encourages the construction of earth so that man himself can live or those who come after him on account of whom he gets rewarded..

1553

Jābir ibn ‘Abdullah reported that the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) said: When - [another version reads]: if - you sell your brother some fruit and it is stricken by a calamity, it is unlawful for you to take anything from him. How can you take your brother's money unjustly?!.

Commentary : Islam is keen on protecting and maintaining rights, and such keenness is manifest in its warning against taking people's rights unjustly and its severe threat against whoever transgresses or violates such a prohibition.
In this Hadīth, the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) clarifies that if someone buys fruits from his Muslim brother, the form of this sale is to buy the fruits while still on the trees or while still in the seller's possession and not yet delivered to the buyer, then, the fruits are stricken by a calamity, which is a disaster or blight that overruns the fruits, causing their destruction and ruin. In this case, it will not be lawful for the seller, who is the owner of the fruits, to take anything from the buyer. How could he take his brother's money when the fruits are damaged and stricken by blight and calamity that prevented benefiting from them?! No one should take his brother's money wrongfully because when the fruits are spoilt, there is nothing left for the buyer in return for what he has paid. Hence, the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) forbade selling fruits before they seem in good condition and ripen - as mentioned in the two Sahīh Collections - since rulings are based on what is predominant.
In the version mentioned in the two Sahīh Collections, the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) was asked: "What is its good condition? He said: Till there is no danger of blight," and it turns out as desired as when it appears to be ripe, for only then, it is safe from disease, which is the blight..

1554

Jābir reported: The Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) commanded that calamities should be remitted..

Commentary : The Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) established the pillars of society upon mercy and solidarity, knowing that if financial transactions are not based on justice, they will lead to the spread of oppression and the transgressing of rights among people.
In this Hadīth, Jābir ibn ‘Abdullah (may Allah be pleased with him and his father) reports that the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) commanded that Jawā’ih (calamities), plural of 'jā’ihah', which is the blight that affects fruits and leads to their eradication, should be remitted. This refers to every prevalent spoiler like rain, snow, locusts, wind, or fire. This means: If fruits are sold after seeming to be in good condition and were then hit by some calamity, the loss is to be suffered by the owner, not the buyer. In a version by Muslim: "If you sell your brother some fruit and it is stricken by a calamity, it is unlawful for you to take anything from him. How can you take your brother's money unjustly?!" This means: None of you should take his brother's money wrongfully because something predominant has overwhelmed the fruits without any negligence on the buyer's part. Therefore, the seller should not require him to pay for what Allah has damaged before he took possession of it in the usual manner, and because when the fruits are spoilt, there is nothing left for the buyer in return for what he has paid..

1556

Abu Sa‘īd al-Khudri reported: At the time of the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) a man suffered a loss in fruits he had purchased, and his debts increased. The Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) said: "Give him charity." So, the people gave him charity, but that was not enough to repay his debt in full. Thereupon, the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) said to his creditors: "Take what you find, and that is all you may have.".

Commentary : The Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) established the pillars of society upon mercy and solidarity. He used to urge creditors to reduce the debt for the debtor who was afflicted by some calamity that ruined his property, be it fruits, cash, assets, or anything else. Therefore, it became part of the Muslim's attitude to constantly seek to fulfill his Muslim brother's need, especially in times of calamities and misfortunes.
In this Hadīth, Abu Sa‘īd al-Khudri (may Allah be pleased with him) reports that at the time of the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him), a man's fruits, which he purchased but had not paid for yet, suffered blight that caused them damage, thereby his debts increased. The Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) commanded people to give him charity so he can repay his debt. In obedience to the Prophet's command, the Companions (may Allah be pleased with them) gave the man charity; however, what he took from people was not enough to settle his debt because it was huge, and there still remained an unsettled part thereof. The Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him), thus, ordered the creditors - those to whom the debt was owed - to take what they found with him from the remaining fruits that could still be useful in addition to what he got from charity. His saying: "and that is all you may have," i.e., you should not ask for what is left of the debt and what he is not able to repay. It was said: That is all you may have because he is currently bankrupt and should be given respite until it is easy for him to pay it back, as Allah Almighty says: {If the debtor is in hardship, give him respite until it is easy for him to pay [the debt] back.} [Surat al-Baqarah: 280]
The Hadīth denotes that whatever the bankrupt still has, should be taken according to its assessed price. He should not be imprisoned or rebuked; rather, he should be given respite until it is easy for him to pay back, then he could settle his debts.
It also shows the merit of consoling the needy and the indebted, and it encourages the act of giving them charity..

1563

‘Abdullah ibn Abi Qatādah reported: Abu Qatādah went looking for his debtor, who hid from him. Then, when he found him, he (the debtor) said: "I am insolvent." Thereupon he said: "By Allah?" He said: "By Allah." So, he said: "I heard the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) say: 'Whoever is pleased to be saved by Allah from the anguish of the Day of Judgment, let him give an insolvent respite or grant him remission.'".

Commentary : Islam is keen on providing treatment for evil human tendencies in transactions, as it is keen on solving disputes between people through tolerance and facilitation in fulfilling financial rights.
In this Hadīth, the Tābi‘i ‘Abdullah ibn Abi Qatādah reports that his father, Abu Qatādah al-Ansāri (may Allah be pleased with him), "went looking for his debtor," and the debtor is the person who owes money to someone else. The debtor hid from Abu Qatādah when he was searching for him, and when Abu Qatādah (may Allah be pleased with him) found him, the debtor said to him: "I am insolvent," and I have no money to repay your debt. So, Abu Qatādah (may Allah be pleased with him) asked him by Allah if he really did not have money, and the debtor swore by Allah that he was telling the truth.
Thereupon, Abu Qatādah (may Allah be pleased with him) informed him that he heard the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) say: "'Whoever is pleased," i.e., glad "to be saved by Allah from the anguish of the Day of Judgment," "Karb" (anguish) means distress and poverty, and "the Karb of the Day of Judgment" means: its hardships and horrors. "Let him give the insolvent respite," i.e., postpone or delay the demand for payment for one who failed to repay it on time. "Or grant him remission," i.e., reduce the debt or cancel it, as Allah Almighty says: {If the debtor is in hardship, give him respite until it is easy for him to pay [the debt] back. But if you waive it as charity, that is better for you.} [Surat al-Baqarah: 280]
The Hadīth encourages the act of giving the insolvent person respite or canceling his debt..

1565

Jābir ibn ‘Abdullāh reported: The Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) forbade the selling of a camel's copulation, selling water and land for cultivation. This is what the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) forbade..

Commentary : There are some natural resources that man cannot dispense with and that are beneficial for all people. If such resources are unavailable, man will perish. Hence, they have been made common among Muslims. Moreover, one may possess what others cannot dispense with, and he may possess something without exerting effort, something that Allah has bestowed upon him, and it could exceed his need, and giving out this surplus is a manifestation of noble morals.
In this Hadīth, Jābir ibn ‘Abdullah (may Allah be pleased with him and his father) reports that the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) forbade the selling of a camel's copulation. In a version by Al-Bukhāri, Ibn Umar (may Allah be pleased with him and his father) reported: "The Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) forbade the stud fees of a stallion," which is the fee taken for the copulation of a male animal, whether a horse, camel, ram, etc. Its form: When someone gives his stud to someone else who owns females and keeps it with him until the stud mates with the females for a fee in return, or when the owner of the females brings them to the owner of the stud and leaves them with him. The Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) forbade this. It is said that because it is ambiguous and uncertain whether it will be of benefit or not and whether the female will or will not be inseminated, it is presumable and involves uncertainty. Or the prohibition could be interpreted as a way of encouraging noble morals and recommending lending it without a return so animals would reproduce abundantly. This is something that Muslims should be willing to grant each other because it is one type of simple assistance that leads to the dominance of the spirit of cooperation and solidarity among people. In the Hadīth of Anas ibn Mālik (may Allah be pleased with him) in At-Tirmidhi Collection, he reported: The Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) granted a concession in the honorarium, i.e., the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) permitted the acceptance of a gift given by the female owner as an honorarium, not as a compensation.
He also forbade selling water. It is said: The prohibition is general, as water should not be sold to Muslims given the fact that it is from their life necessities. In another version by Muslim, the prohibition has to do with "selling excess water," which is the water exceeding the need of the well owner, his children, cattle, and crops. In the two Sahīh Collections, Abu Hurayrah (may Allah be pleased with him) reported that the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) said: "Do not withhold excess water to prevent thereby excess herbage," which is the grass. This means: When a man owns a well in the desert and it has water that exceeds his needs and there is grass that has no other source of water except this water, the cattle owner cannot graze it unless they are watered from this well, in this case, it is unlawful for him to withhold this excess water from the cattle and he has to give it out without compensation.
The Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) forbade land for cultivation, i.e., leasing it for cultivation. This is when a man gives his land to someone to cultivate in return for taking a share of his produce. This has many forms, as the Companions used to cultivate the land in return for one-third, one-fourth, or half its fruits during the lifetime of the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him). In the two Sahīh Collections and Musnad of Ahmad Collection - and this is the wording of Ahmad - Hanzhalah ibn Qays reported that Rāfi‘ ibn Khadīj said: "The Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) forbade leasing farms. He said: I said: Even if it is in return for gold and silver? He said: No, but he forbade it in return for part of its produce, but in return for gold and silver, there is no harm in it." In a version by Muslim: "As for something known and guaranteed, there is nothing wrong with it." This Hadīth indicates that what the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) has forbidden was something clearly evil, namely the unfair and unjust Muzāra‘ah (sharecropping). This is why he prohibited it; however, there is nothing wrong with something known and guaranteed in dinar and dirham, as mentioned in the Hadīths and narrations.
The Hadīth encourages the act of giving excess water for free without demanding compensation..

1568

Rāfi‘ ibn Kahdīj reported that the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) said: "The price of a sold dog is evil, the earning of a prostitute is evil, and the earning of a cupper is evil.".

Commentary : Allah has made what is good lawful for His slaves and has made unlawful for them whatever is evil from among food, drink, gains, trade, etc. Shariah has also urged Muslims to have self-esteem and to look down on lowly things.
In this Hadīth, the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) said: "The price of a sold dog is evil," i.e., unlawful. This means that the price of selling or buying it or what is earned from that is ill-gotten money because it is prohibited to own or raise dogs except for dogs that are used in guarding livestock or farming. It is said: This is a general ruling, whether it is trained to hunt or untrained, and whether it is permissible to keep it or not. It is also said: The dog used in guarding and hunting is an exception because it is useful, as mentioned in the Sunan At-Tirmidhi Collection from the Hadīth of Abu Hurayrah (may Allah be pleased with him): "Except for the hunting dog." The version of Ad-Dāraqutni reads: "Except for the dog trained to hunt," which is the one accustomed to hunting. It is as if the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) forbade the price of the dog except for the dog that is permitted to be kept for a certain benefit, or perhaps the prohibition of the dog's price was at the beginning of Islam. Then it was abrogated later, and it became permissible to use it in hunting and, thus became like all the birds of prey in terms of the permissibility of selling it.
Likewise, the money the adulteress takes in return for adultery and for giving herself to a foreign man is unlawful because adultery is unlawful, and the money gained therefrom is unlawful. The Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) called it "dowry" because it takes the form of a dowry, as it is paid in return for being allowed by the woman to have intercourse with her. In the pre-Islamic era of ignorance, they used to force their slave girls to commit adultery and take it as a means of earning money. But Islam criticized this, as Allah Almighty says: {Do not compel your slave girls into prostitution – if they wish to keep chaste – seeking the worldly gains of this life. But if anyone compels them, then Allah, after such a compulsion, is All-Forgiving, Most Merciful.} [Surat an-Nūr: 33]
"And the earnings of a cupper are evil." "Hajjām" (cupper) is the one making Hijāmah (cupping), which means drawing blood from veins and removing the bad blood from the body. Being an evil earning does not mean it is unlawful because the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) had Hijāmah made for him and he paid the cupper a fee, as mentioned in the Two Sahīh Collections from the Hadīth of Ibn ‘Abbās (may Allah be pleased with him and his father). Had it been unlawful, the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) would not have given him. So, the Hadīths that forbid the cupper's earnings and clearly state that they are evil are interpreted in the sense of encouraging the act of keeping away from and rising above this means of earning and promoting good morals and noble things. Or perhaps the prohibition was at the beginning of Islam, then it was abrogated. So, when he gave the cupper his fee, this abrogated the previous ruling..

1572

Jābir ibn ‘Abdullāh reported: The Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) commanded us to kill dogs; even when a woman brought her dog along with her from the desert, we used to kill it. Then, the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) forbade killing them and said: Restrict yourselves to the pitch-black one that has two spots, for it is a devil..

Commentary : The pure Shariah has regulated the rulings of everything even animals, which include dogs. The Shariah has determined the way of benefiting from them and has clarified the rulings of what is lawful and unlawful regarding them.
In this Hadīth, Jābir ibn ‘Abdullah (may Allah be pleased with him and his father) reports that the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) commanded them to kill all dogs without any exception, to the extent that even when a woman came from the Bādiyah, which is the desert, bringing along her dog that would guard her and accompany her, we used to kill it in response to the Prophet's command. Afterwards, the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) forbade killing dogs except for the pitch-black dog, the one that is totally black, "that has two spots," i.e., the two white spots above his eyes, as this dog is to be killed. His saying: "For it is a devil", means either in the true sense of the word for being pure harm that is void of any benefit or it is far from being beneficial and close to being harmful and detrimental, which is the case with the devil. So, this is a simile where the black dog is likened to the devil given its malice and because the black dog is the worst of dogs, the least in benefit, the most harmful, and the most mordacious.
It was authentically reported in other Hadīths that the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) forbade killing dogs except for the mordacious dog that hurts people, which should be killed, as mentioned in the Hadīth of ‘Ā’ishah (may Allah be pleased with her) in the two Sahīh Collections: "Five animals are all vicious and harmful and are to be killed inside the Sacred Precincts: the crow, the kite, the scorpion, the mouse, and the mordacious dog."
In this Hadīth and similar ones, there is a prohibition of killing dogs, apart from those excluded, which are kept for benefiting from them in guarding, hunting, etc. It is said: Rather, he commanded killing them at first because people were so accustomed to having them, and dogs used to share with them their utensils. So, he wanted to wean them off that and, thus, gave the command of killing. However, when the idea of their filthiness and keeping them away became firmly established in themselves, he forbade this. Such a prohibition abrogated that command. So, the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) forbade killing all dogs, even jet-black dogs, except for the harmful and aggressive ones..

1578

Abu Sa‘īd al-Khudri reported: I heard the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) delivering a sermon in Madīnah saying: "O People, Allah Almighty is alluding to intoxicants, and perhaps Allah will send down a ruling regarding it. So, whoever has some of it, let him sell it and benefit from it." He said: Only a short while after that, the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) said: "Verily, Allah Almighty has forbidden intoxicants. Whoever knew this verse and had some of it, let him neither drink it nor sell it." He said: The people received this (prohibition) and came out into the street of Madīnah with what they had and poured it all out..

Commentary : Advising common people regarding their religious and worldly affairs is necessary, and the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) was the keenest on offering his Ummah advice on their religious and worldly affairs.
In this Hadīth, Abu Sa‘īd al-Khudri (may Allah be pleased with him) reports: When the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) felt that intoxicants would be prohibited - as it was lawful at first - he advised them to hasten to benefit from it. He addressed his Companions (may Allah be pleased with them) in a sermon that he delivered in Madīnah saying: "O People, Allah Almighty is alluding to intoxicants," i.e., He is mentioning it without prohibiting it or making it unlawful, in reference to the verse in which Allah Almighty says: {They ask you about intoxicants and gambling. Say, “In both, there is a great sin, and some benefits for people, but their sin is far greater than their benefit.”} [Surat al-Baqarah: 219] And His saying: {O you who believe, do not approach the prayer while you are intoxicated until you know what you are saying.} [Surat an-Nisā’: 43] The two verses include a reference and a hint that intoxicants will be inevitably prohibited. Hence, as a word of advice, the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) ordered his Companions that whoever had something of such intoxicants should either sell it or benefit from it before it is completely prohibited in such a way that would make it impermissible to either sell it or benefit from it. This is because some of them used to work and trade in intoxicants and others used to keep and store them. The Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) wanted to protect their properties, and only a short while after the Prophet's advice, Allah revealed the prohibition of intoxicants in His Book saying: {O you who believe, intoxicants, gambling, [sacrificing on] stone alters, and divining arrows are of Satan’s evil work; therefore, avoid such [evil], so that you may be successful.} [Surat al-Mā’idah: 90] When it was revealed, the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) informed them that whoever learned about this verse must "neither drink it nor sell it." So, all those who had something of the intoxicants poured it all out in the streets of Madīnah.
The Companions (may Allah be pleased with them) understood from the Prophet's prohibition of its drinking and selling that it must not also be used in any aspect. Hence, they hastened to pour it out and ruin it. Had it contained any permissible benefit, the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) would have called attention to it.
The Hadīth indicates how the ruler should take care of his Ummah's interests, prepare people, and gradually issue rulings, especially concerning matters that are deeply rooted in the society.
It also shows how a true believer hastens to respond to Allah's command..

1579

‘Abdur-Rahmān ibn Wa‘lah as-Saba’i (from the people of Egypt) reported: That he asked ‘Abdullah ibn ‘Abbās about what is squeezed from grapes. Ibn ‘Abbas (may Allah be pleased with him and his father) said: A man gave the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) a waterskin of wine as a gift. Thereupon, the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) said to him: Did you know that Allah has forbidden it? He said: No. He, then, whispered to another man, so the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) said to him: What did you whisper to him? He said: I ordered him to sell it. He said: The One Who has forbidden drinking it has forbidden selling it. He said: So, he opened the waterskin and poured out what was in it..

Commentary : Khamr (intoxicants) is the mother of all evils and its harm is far greater than its benefit. A Muslim must by no means drink it. The Shariah has forbidden all forms of Khamr and all forms of benefiting from it.
In this Hadīth, the Tābi‘i ‘Abdur-Rahmān ibn Wa‘lah narrates that he asked ‘Abdullah ibn ‘Abbās (may Allah be pleased with him and his father) about the ruling on the drink extracted from grapes; he was apparently asking about the Khamr derived from grapes. ‘Abdullah ibn ‘Abbās (may Allah be pleased with him and his father) informed him that a man gave the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) "a waterskin of wine" as a gift. "Rāwiyah" (waterskin): a container made of skin. Thereupon, the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) asked him: Did you know that Allah Almighty has forbidden it? Perhaps the question was intended to find out about his stance, for if he knew about its prohibition, he would object upon him for giving it as a gift, holding and carrying it, and he would be subject to discretionary punishment. However, when he informed him that he did not know about it, he excused him. It is possible that the man was among those outside Madīnah before the ruling of its prohibition spread. So, the man negated having any knowledge about its prohibition and its unlawfulness. This man whispered secretly to another man beside him without letting the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) hear him. The Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him), thus, asked him: "What did you whisper to him?" The Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) asked him about what he whispered only because he probably thought that his words to the other man had to do with this wine, so he wanted to clarify to him the comprehensiveness of the ruling of Khamr and how the prohibition is not just about drinking it as will be clarified later. The man answered the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) saying: "I ordered him to sell it." In a version by Ahmad: "The man went to his servant and said: Go and sell it," whereupon, he (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) said: "The One Who has forbidden drinking it has forbidden selling it," so selling it is just as prohibited as drinking it. His saying: "The One," is an indirect reference to the name of Allah Almighty, as if he said: Allah has forbidden drinking it and has forbidden selling it. It could also mean: What required the prohibition of drinking it required the prohibition of selling it, since it could only be wanted for drinking, so, if drinking is forbidden, then the sale is impermissible as it is deemed to be consumption of property wrongfully. So, the man opened the Mazādah - which is the waterskin - and poured out what was in it and got rid of it.
What is apparent from the reporting of Ibn ‘Abbās (may Allah be pleased with him and his father) is that this Hadīth is an answer to the question of ‘Abdur-Rahmān ibn Wa‘lah is to make it clear that the prohibition is relevant to whatever is considered Khamr, is intoxicating, and causes one to lose control of his mental faculties, whether it is made from grapes or other things.
The Hadīth highlights the Prophet's good approach of teaching.
It points out the prohibition of selling intoxicants.
It indicates that whoever presents something unlawful as a gift, his gift must not be accepted.
It signifies that whoever commits a sin without knowing about its prohibition incurs no sin and must not be subject to discretionary punishment..

1585

‘Uthmān ibn ‘Affān reported that the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) said: Do not sell a dinar for two dinars or a dirham for two dirhams..

Commentary : Riba (usury) is one of the types of exploitation in transactions. It entails great harm and involves unlawful earnings and taking extra money wrongfully. Therefore, it has been prohibited in all the laws that have been revealed. Riba has various types, all of which are prohibited. Riba al-Fadl (usury of surplus) is one type and it means selling an item that is subject to Riba rulings for another of the same type with excess in one of the two, like selling a gold dinar for two dinars and a silver dirham for two dirhams, which have been prohibited by the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) in this Hadīth.
An example of this is selling new gold or silver coins for those that weigh more, thus, taking in return for every one coin two old gold or silver coins. The Shariah states that such a sale is not to be concluded unless they are both alike and equal in weight, regardless of the quality or the inferiority, and on condition that the two currencies are present during the sale transaction and are exchanged hand to hand. So, equality and exchange during the contract session are conditions when selling an item for another item of the same type. However, if the type varies and the cause remains - like selling gold for silver - equality is no longer required, but exchange during the contract session is still a condition, as the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) said in Sahīh Muslim Collection: "If these classes differ, sell as you wish as long as payment is made hand to hand."
The Hadīth indicates the prohibition of Riba al-Fadl (usury of surplus)..

1586

Mālik ibn Aws ibn al-Hadathān reported: I came saying: "Who will exchange the dirhams?" Talhah ibn ‘Ubaydullah, who was with ‘Umar ibn al-Khattāb, said: "Show us your gold, then come to us when our servant comes to give you your silver." Thereupon, ‘Umar ibn al-Khattāb said: "No, by Allah, you must either give him his silver (now) or give him back his gold, for the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) said: 'Silver for gold is Riba (usury) unless they are exchanged on the spot; wheat for wheat is Riba unless they are exchanged on the spot; barley for barley is Riba unless they are exchanged on the spot; and dried dates for dried dates is Riba unless they are exchanged on the spot.'".

Commentary : Riba (usury) is one of the types of exploitation in transactions. It entails great harm and involves unlawful earnings and taking extra money wrongfully. Therefore, it has been prohibited in all the revealed laws.
In this Hadīth, Mālik ibn Aws ibn al-Hadathān (may Allah be pleased with him) reports that he came to a gathering and ‘Umar ibn al-Khattāb (may Allah be pleased with him) was among them. Mālik was saying: "Who will exchange the dirhams?" i.e., Who will buy the golden dinars that I have with silver dirhams, as Mālik ibn Aws ibn al-Hadathān had one hundred dinars - as mentioned in the version of Al-Bukhāri - which he wanted to exchange for dirhams. Talhah ibn ‘Ubaydullah - who was in this gathering with ‘Umar ibn al-Khattāb (may Allah be pleased with him) - said: "Show us your gold," i.e., give us your dinars to see them, "then come to us" later on "when our servant comes, we will give you your silver," i.e., the silver dirhams. On hearing this, ‘Umar ibn al-Khattāb (may Allah be pleased with him) said: "No," which indicates his refusal of this kind of transaction. Then, ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him) swore that he should give him the silver he wanted to buy on the spot, or he should give him back the gold that he took from him. He explained that by quoting the statement of the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him): "Silver for gold is Riba," i.e., selling silver for gold is Riba (usury) in all cases "unless they are exchanged on the spot," i.e., except in the case of physical presence and the immediate exchange of items hand to hand. Likewise, selling "Burr" - which is wheat - for Burr, selling barley for barley, and selling dried dates for dried dates all constitute Riba in all cases except in the case of physical presence and the immediate exchange of items hand to hand.
The Hadīth denotes the prohibition of the Nasī’ah Riba (usury of deferred payment).
It also encourages the act of forbidding evil for whoever has the ability to do so.
It points out that the evidence should be mentioned when forbidding evil.
It also shows that some knowledge may not be known to an old man until someone else reminds him of it..

1587

Abu Qilābah reported: I was in the Levant in a circle and Muslim ibn Yasār was there. There came Abu al-Ash‘ath. He said: They said: Abu al-Ash‘ath, Abu al-Ash‘ath. So, he sat down. I said to him: Narrate to our brother the Hadīth of ‘Ubādah ibn as-Sāmit. He said: Yes. We set out on an expedition while Mu‘āwiyah was the leader of the people, and we gained a lot of spoils. There were silver utensils among such spoils, so Mu‘āwiyah ordered a man to sell them for the people's payments. The people hastened to that. On hearing about it, 'Ubādah ibn as-Sāmit stood up and said: Verily, I heard the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) forbidding the sale of gold for gold, silver for silver, wheat for wheat, barley for barley, dry dates for dry dates, and salt for salt except equal for equal and like for like. So, whoever made or accepted an addition has committed Riba (usury). Thereupon, the people returned what they had taken. On hearing about it, Mu‘āwiyah stood up and delivered a sermon saying: What is the matter with some men narrating from the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) Hadīths that we had not heard from him although we saw and accompanied him?! Thereupon, ‘Ubādah ibn as-Sāmit stood up and repeated the story, then said: We will surely narrate what he heard from the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) even if Mu‘āwiyah disliked this, or he said, Even if it is against his will. I do not mind if I do not accompany him in his troops on a black night..

Commentary : The Companions (may Allah be pleased with them) used to advise one another in all states. They used to convey the Shariah-related commands and prohibitions without showing favoritism to or fear of a ruler or a caliph, and they would all comply with the truth.
In this Hadīth, the Tābi‘i Abu Qilābah ‘Abdullah ibn Zayd reports that he was in the Levant - which is currently Syria, Jordan, Palestine, and Lebanon - and was sitting in a circle that was attended by the Tābi‘i Muslim ibn Yasār. They were probably holding a gathering of knowledge. Then, Abu al-Ash‘ath Sharāhīl ibn Ādah came and sat with them. Abu Qilābah said to him: "Narrate to our brother" referring to Muslim ibn Yasār. Abu al-Ash‘ath responded to him and narrated to him the Hadīth of the Companion ‘Ubādah ibn as-Sāmit (may Allah be pleased with him) and reported that they fought a battle, led by Mu‘āwiyah ibn Abi Sufyān (may Allah be pleased with him and his father), and the Muslims gained a lot of spoils. "Ghanīmah" (spoils): it is everything Muslims take from the disbelievers' properties after overpowering and conquering them. There were silver utensils among the spoils, so Mu‘āwiyah (may Allah be pleased with him) commanded a man to sell them in dirhams as a deferred payment from the people's payments. "U'tiyāt" (payments) is the plural of "u'tiyah", and it refers here to what the country gives the soldiers as a regular payment monthly or annually. This means: He ordered these silver utensils to be sold in dirhams as a deferred payment until the buyers received their salaries. So, people from the army havetened to buy these utensils in return for deferred dirhams until it was time for them to receive their wages. ‘Ubādah ibn as-Sāmit (may Allah be pleased with him), who was present in the army, learned about this, so he stood up and delivered a sermon saying: Verily, I heard the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) forbidding the sale of gold for gold, silver for silver, wheat for wheat, barley for barley, dry dates for dry dates, and salt for salt except equal for equal and like for like, i.e., The Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) forbade selling these similar types in all cases unless they are like for like, i.e., equal in weight, and are visible, and present not absent, as mentioned in the two Sahīh Collections: "Do not sell available money for something absent."
The one who gives excess and the one who asks for it each of them has committed the prohibited Riba (usury), and both are equally sinful.
On hearing this, the people returned the utensils they had taken to the man who had sold them to them. When Mu‘āwiyah (may Allah be pleased with him and his father) heard about the Hadīth that was narrated by ‘Ubādah, he stood up and delivered a sermon saying: "What is the matter with some men?" alluding to what 'Ubādah (may Allah be pleased with him) had said, "narrating from the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) Hadīths that we had not heard from him although we saw" him, i.e., we used to be in his presence and accompany him in his journeys. It seems that Mu‘āwiyah (may Allah be pleased with him) neither heard nor knew about this Hadīth, as was the case with others who did not know about it initially. The fact that he (may Allah be pleased with him) did not hear it does not serve as proof. Thereupon, Ubādah ibn as-Sāmit (may Allah be pleased with him) stood up when Mu‘āwiyah criticized him, and repeated the Hadīth once again and said: "We will surely narrate," i.e., we will surely tell people "what he heard from the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) even if Mu‘āwiyah disliked it," referring to Mu‘āwiyah ibn Abi Sufyān, the army leader, or he said: "Even if it is against his will," i.e., even if he is disgraced and stuck to dust. Then, he said: "I do not mind if I do not accompany him," i.e., I do not care about not accompanying him, and I do not want to be employed among his soldiers, and I want to part with him on a black night, i.e., dark and moonless.
The Hadīth signifies the keenness to convey the Sunnah acts and spread knowledge even if it is against the will of anyone.
It highlights the prohibition of Riba.
It stresses that the truth should be declared even if the one to whom it is declared is senior..

1588

Abu Hurayrah (may Allah be pleased with him) reported that the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) said: Gold for gold, weight for weight, like for like; and silver for silver, weight for weight, like for like. Whoever gives or takes more is engaged in Riba (usury)..

Commentary : Riba (usury) is one of the types of exploitation in transactions. It entails great harm and involves unlawful earnings and taking extra money wrongfully. Therefore, it has been prohibited in all the laws that have been revealed. Riba has various types, all of which are prohibited. Riba al-Fadl (usury of surplus) is one type of it; it means selling an item that is subject to Riba rulings for another of the same kind with excess in one of the two, like selling a gold dinar for two dinars and a silver dirham for two dirhams. Hence, the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) ordered us in this Hadīth to sell gold for gold - whether in the form of gold dinars or others - weight for weight and like for like without addition or reduction, so, both should be similar in weight and equal. Likewise, silver is to be sold for silver - whether in the form of silver dirhams or others - weight for weight and like for like without addition or reduction, so both should be equal in weight. Whoever gives more or takes more has committed unlawful Riba.
Other versions have clarified that if the types vary, then selling with a surplus is permissible; however, the sale should not be for a deferred payment; rather, it should be immediate, as the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) said in the two Sahīh Collections - and this is the wording of Al-Bukhāri -: "And sell gold for silver and silver for gold as you wish." In Sahīh Muslim Collection: "If these classes differ, sell as you wish as long as payment is made hand to hand."
The Hadīth highlights the prohibition of Riba al-Fadl (usury of surplus).
It stresses the prohibition of all transactions that entail harm to people in terms of their properties and relations..

1591

Hanash reported: We were along with Fadālah ibn' Ubayd on an expedition. A necklace made of gold, silver and jewels fell to my and my friends' lot. I wanted to buy it, so I asked Fadālah ibn' Ubayd, at which point he said: Separate its gold and place it in one pan and place your gold in the other pan and do not receive but like for like, as I heard the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) say: Whoever believes in Allah and the Last Day should not take but like for like..

Commentary : Riba (usury) is one of the types of exploitation in transactions. It entails great harm and involves unlawful earnings and taking extra money wrongfully. Therefore, it has been prohibited in all the laws that have been revealed. Riba al-Fadl (usury of surplus) is one of the types of Riba; it means selling an item that is subject to Riba rulings for another of the same type with excess in one of the two, like selling a gold dinar for two dinars and a silver dirham for two dirhams.
In this Hadīth, the Tābi‘i Hanash as-San‘āni narrates that they were with the Companion Fadālah ibn ‘Ubayd (may Allah be pleased with him) on an expedition. A necklace, a piece of women's jewelry worn around the neck, from the spoils fell to his lot along with a group of his companions and it had gold, silver, and jewels like pearls and the like. Hanash wanted to buy it all and take his companions' share, so he asked Fadālah ibn' Ubayd (may Allah be pleased with him) about the ruling and manner of buying it along with everything in it. Thereupon, Fadālah (may Allah be pleased with him) ordered him to remove and separate its gold and place it in a balance pan - where the weighed item is put - and to put his gold on the opposite pan so there would be equality between the two amounts of gold without any surplus, and this could not be known except by separating it from the jewels. Then, he should not take of its gold except for like of his own gold that he deemed a payment for it so that he would not give or take any extra and, thus, engage in unlawful Riba. Likewise, the silver in it should be sold for an equal weight, and other jewels should be sold at their price for cash. He then justified this by saying that he heard the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) say: "Whoever believes in Allah" Who created him and has full faith in Him "and the Last Day", which is the Day of Judgment to which he will return and on which he will receive recompense for his deeds, should not buy gold or silver except like for like in terms of weight without any addition or surplus.
The Hadīth emphasizes the prohibition of Riba, as it linked its prohibition to belief in Allah and the Last Day..

Book of Hadith