| 2 Hadiths


Hadith
3101
Safiyyah(may Allah be pleased with her), the wife of the Prophet ﷺ, narrated that she came to visit Allah's Messenger ﷺ while he was in I‘tikaaf (i.e., spiritual retreat in the mosque to devote oneself exclusively to worship Allah during the last ten days of Ramadan). When she got up to return, Allah's Messenger ﷺgot up with her and accompanied her, and when he reached near the gate of the mosque close to the door (of the house) of Umm Salamah, the wife of the Prophet, two men from the Ansaar passed by them and greeted Allah's Messenger ﷺ and then went away. Allah's Messenger ﷺ addressed them saying, "Do not hurry! (She is my wife)."  They said, "Glorified be Allah! O Allah's Messenger ﷺ (You are far away from any suspicion)," and his saying was hard on them. Allah's Messenger ﷺ said, "Satan circulates in the mind of a person as blood does (in his body). I was afraid that Satan might put some (evil) thoughts in your minds."
.

Commentary :
Satan has always been the sworn enemy of human beings since the beginning of history. He entices and whispers to them to accuse others without evidence, and that is why the Prophet ﷺ used to warn his Companions (may Allah be pleased with them) against the (gravity of) satanic whisperings.
In this hadeeth, the Mother of the Believers, Safiyyah(may Allah be pleased with her)narrated that she came to visit Allah's Messenger ﷺ while he was observing I‘tikaaf (i.e., a retreat in the mosque to devote oneself exclusively to worship Allah) in the mosque during the last ten days of Ramadan. When she (may Allah be pleased with her) got up to return home, Allah's Messenger ﷺ got up with her and escorted her. When he ﷺ reached near the gate of the mosque close to the door (of the house) of Umm Salamah, the wife of the Prophet ﷺ, two men from the Ansaar passed by them and greeted Allah's Messenger ﷺ and then went away in a hurry, out of respect for the Prophet ﷺ when they (may Allah be pleased with them) saw him standing with one of his wives. The wording of the hadeeth suggests that they did not know that she was his wife. Allah's Messenger ﷺ addressed them saying, "Do not hurry! (She is my wife)."  They said, "Glorified be Allah! O Allah's Messenger ﷺ;” you are far above any suspicion. They were astonished by his saying, and it was hard on them that the Prophet ﷺ thought that they would even think ill of him! Allah's Messenger ﷺ said, "Satan circulates in the mind of a person as blood does (in his body). I was afraid that Satan might put some (evil) thoughts in your minds." He ﷺ informed them that he ﷺ feared that Satan should whisper to them and implant evil thoughts in their heads, driving them to think ill of the Prophet ﷺ, and this would have incurred their ruin. Therefore, he ﷺ hastened to inform them of the reality, edifying them and the following Muslim generations on the right thing to do, should any of them be in a similar situation.
The hadeeth underlines the permissibility of visiting a person observing I‘tikaaf in his place of seclusion.
It is inferred therefrom that one should eliminate all doubts and means that could lead others to think ill of him, by unveiling the truth to people at the proper time..

3104
Narrated `Abdullah: The Prophetﷺstood up and delivered a sermon and pointing to the house of `Aaishah (may Allah be pleased with her) (i.e. eastwards), he said thrice, "Affliction (will appear from) here," and "from where the horn of Satan comes out (i.e. from the East).
.

Commentary : The Prophet ﷺ would warn his nation of evil and tribulations and clarify to them some of their aspects so that the Muslims would be informed and able to avoid failing in those tribulations.

In this hadeeth, ‘Abdullah ibn ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him) reports that the Prophet ﷺ delivered a sermon one day, during which he ﷺ pointed eastwards – towards the direction of the lands of Persia and beyond or the lands of Najd, Rabee’ah and Mudar, as all of them are situated eastward of al-Madeenah. He ﷺ informed the Companions (may Allah be pleased with them) that tribulations would emerge from these lands, and he repeated his warning three times to emphasise it and ensure everyone could hear him.

His statement “from where the horn of Satan comes out” means that thence will be the base of his followers and supporters or dominion and strength. The False Messiah, the greatest affliction and tribulation that will befall humanity, will come out from the direction of these lands. It is said that the hadeeth refers to great tribulations and wars that afterwards emerged from Iraq like the Battle of the Camel, the battles of Siffeen and Harooraa, the afflictions of Banoo Umayyah and the khawaarij. All of those events emerged fromIraq and eastwards of Najd. It is reported on the authority of Ibn ‘Abbaas (may Allah be pleased with him): The Prophet ﷺ said, "Oh Allah, bless us in our Syria; O Allah, bless us in our Yemen." Those present said: "And in our Najd, O Messenger of Allah!" But he ﷺsaid, "O Allah, bless us in our Syria; O Allah, bless us in our Saa' and Mudd (measures representing food). O Allah bless us in our Shaam and Yemen." Those present said, "And in our Najd, O Messenger of Allah!" He ﷺ said, "There shall arise the horn of Satan, tribulations will emerge from there,andrepulsion is in the east." [ Reported by al-Tabaraanee].

The Prophet ﷺ in this hadeeth foretells some of the events that will take place in the future, which are considered from the unseen. The hadeeth serves as a warning against tribulations..

3107
Narrated `Isaa ibn Tahmaan: Anas (may Allah be pleased with him) brought out to us two worn-out footwear without hair and with pieces of straps. Later, Thaabit Al-Banaanee told me that Anas said that they were the shoes of the Prophet ﷺ.
.

Commentary : The Prophet ﷺ was ascetic in his life and totally detached from its pleasures, despite all the spoils and wealth Allah had granted him, as he was focused only on the Hereafter. He ﷺ set for us a great example in abstaining from worldly pleasures and sufficing with the minimum.

In this hadeeth, the Taab’iee ‘Isaa ibn Tahmaan reports that Anas ibn Maalik (may Allah be pleased with him) kept two old items of footwear (Arabic Na’l),i.e. a slingback that often does not cover the entire foot from above. One day, Anas showed them to people, and they were so old that the hair on them was worn out. They had front straps used to tighten the footwear to the foot. It was Thaabit al-Bunaanee who informed ‘Issaa ibn Tahmaan that they were the shoes of the Prophet ﷺ as he heard it directly from Anas – who was the servant of the Prophet ﷺ for ten years.

The hadeeth shows how the Companions (may Allah be pleased with them) were so keen on keeping the items of the Prophet ﷺ and would utilise them to teach people..

3108
Narrated Aboo Burdah:`Aaishah (may Allah be pleased with her) brought out to us a patched garment, and she said, "The soul of Allah's Messengerﷺwas taken away while he was wearing this."
According to the hadeeth from the way of Sulaymaan from Humayd, Aboo Burdah added, "Aaishah (may Allah be pleased with her)brought out to us a thick waist sheet like the ones made by the Yemenites, and also a garment of the type called Al- Mulabbadah."
.

Commentary : The Prophet ﷺ was ascetic in his life and totally detached from its pleasures, despite all the spoils and wealth Allah had granted him, as he was focused only on the Hereafter. He ﷺ set for us a great example in abstaining from worldly pleasures and sufficing with the minimum.

In this hadeeth, Aboo Burdah ibn Aboo Moosa al-Ash’aree reports that ‘Aaishah (may Allah be pleased with her), the Mother of the Believers, brought out a Kisaa Mulabbad i.e. a patched garment or a patched thick sheet. It is said that it is a garment that becomes thick from the middle, and it appearsthe term is only used in reference to garments made of wool. She (may Allah be pleased with her) told them that the Prophet ﷺ was wearing it at the time his blessed soul departed his noble body. The Prophet ﷺ used to wear with this garment a thick waist sheet made in Yemen to cover his private body parts and lower half. The reason the Prophet ﷺ wore these types of garments could be due to his humility and intent to abstain from living a soft life. It is possible that he ﷺ did it without intending it, since he would wear whatever was available for him.

The hadeeth shows how the Companions (may Allah be pleased with them) were so keen on keeping the relics of the Prophet ﷺ and benefitting from them in educating people. .

3110
Narrated `Alee ibn Al-Husayn: “When they reached Al-Madeenah after returning from Yazeed ibn Mu'aawaiyah after the martyrdom of al-Husayn ibn `Alee (may Allah bestow His Mercy upon him), Al-Miswar ibn Makhramah met him and said to him, "Do you have any need you may order me to satisfy?" `Alee said, "No." Al-Miswar said, Will you give me the sword of Allah's Messengerﷺfor I am afraid that people may take it from you by force? By Allah, if you give it to me, they will never be able to take it till I die." When `Alee ibn Aboo Taalib asked for the hand of the daughter of Aboo Jahal to be his wife besides Faatimah (may Allah be pleased with her), I heard Allah's Messengerﷺon his pulpit delivering a sermon in this connection before the people, and I had then attained my age of puberty. Allah's Messengerﷺsaid, "Faatimah is from me, and I am afraid she will be subjected to trials in her religion." The Prophetﷺthen mentioned one of his sons-in-law who was from the tribe of Banee ‘Abd Shams, and he praised him as a good son-in-law, saying, "Whatever he said was the truth, and he promised me and fulfilled his promise. I do not make that which is lawful forbidden, nor do I make that which is forbidden lawful, but by Allah, the daughter of Allah's Messengerﷺand the daughter of the enemy of Allah, (i.e. Aboo Jahl) can never get together.”.

Commentary : The Prophet ﷺ loved his daughter Faatimah (may Allah be pleased with her)ardently and wholeheartedly such that anything that would harm her was as if it harmed him personally.

In this hadeeth, ‘Alee ibn al-Husayn ibn ‘Alee, alias Zayn al-‘Aaabideen (may Allah be pleased with him), reports that after the martyrdom of al-Husayn ibn `Alee (may Allah be pleased with him), whose death was on the 10th of Muharram in the year 61 of Hijrah, he travelled along with members from the family of the Prophet ﷺ from Damascus –where Yazeed ibn Mu'aawaiyah was based – to al-Madeenah. There, al-Miswar ibn Muhramah embraced and welcomed ‘Alee ibn al-Husayn (may Allah be pleased with him) and asked him if there was anything that he needed so that he could fulfil it for him. ‘Alee ibn al-Husayn (may Allah be pleased with him) advised him that there was nothing that he needed. Then, he asked him to entrust him with the sword of the Prophet ﷺ to keep it safe for him, because he feared that others who did not know the true value of this sword would overpower him and take the sword from him by force. He swore to ‘Alee that if he kept the sword with him, neither Yazeed nor his supporters would be able to reach it except over his dead body.It is said that this sword could be the famous sword Thoo al-Faqaar.

The reason Miswar proposed to keep the swordwas only to protect it for ‘Alee ibn al-Husayn because at that time he was youngi.e.he feared people would overpower him and take it from him forcefully. His intent was to protect the sword of the Prophet ﷺ and keep it in safety for ‘Alee ibn al-Husayn (may Allah be pleased with him). It is said that he swore by Allah that hewould be able to protect it out of his confidence and trust in Allah that He would enable him to duly fulfil his promise.

Then, al-Miswar relates that ‘Alee ibn Abee Taalib (may Allah be pleased with him) asked for the hand of the daughter of Aboo Jahal to be his wife to have her as a co-wife with Faatimah (may Allah be pleased with her). After the news reached the Prophet ﷺ, he delivered a sermon on his pulpit in which he said that Faatimah was a part of him, and that he feared she would be subjected to trials in her religion because of jealousy. Then, he ﷺ mentioned one of his sons-in-law who was from the tribe of Banee ‘Abd Shams i.e. Al-‘Aas ibn al-Rabee’ ibn ‘Ad ‘Uzza ibn ‘Abd Shams who was the husband of his daughter Zaynab (may Allah be pleased with her) before Islam.He ﷺ praised him as a good son-in-law, saying, "Whatever he said was the truth, and he promised me and fulfilled his promise,” as he promised to send Zaynab to the Prophet ﷺ and he kept his promise. The Prophet ﷺ then added,“I do not make that which is lawful forbidden, nor do I make that which is forbidden lawful, but by Allah, the daughter of Allah's Messengerﷺand the daughter of the enemy of Allah, (i.e. Aboo Jahl) can never get together (as the wives of one man)” i.e. I do not say a word that contravenes the law of Allah but proceeding with this marriage proposal harms me (and yet I do not say that such marriage is unlawful). It is said that he ﷺ was referring to havingthe daughter of Aboo Jahl as a co-wife with Faatimah, which is to indicate that marrying the daughter of Aboo Jahl is lawful, but he disapproved his marriage to her because that would hurt the feelings of and harm Faatimah (may Allah be pleased with her), and the Prophet ﷺ mentioned that whatever harmed her harmed him. The Prophet ﷺpreserved his rank and the rank of his daughter by not allowing the daughter of the enemy of Allah to be her co-wife. He ﷺ even swore by Allah with confidence that the daughter of Allah's Messengerﷺand the daughter of the enemy of Allah, (i.e. Aboo Jahl) can never get together as the wives of one man. As such, this has become one of the forbidden marriages i.e. having the daughter of Allah's Messengerﷺand the daughter of the enemy of Allah (i.e. Aboo Jahl) as co-wives.

It is said that al-Miswar related the story of ‘Alee (may Allah be pleased with him) with the daughter of Aboo Jahl after requesting the sword for many reasons. One of which is that he wanted to say that as the Prophet ﷺ loved Faatimah (may Allah be pleased with her) so much, it is obligatory upon every believer to love her offspring.As the Prophet ﷺ was so considerate of her,gave importance toher feelings and wanted to ensure her happiness, he thuswanted to do the same, and ensure that which was in the best interestsof her grandson. Hence, he should be entrusted with the sword, as he would do all he could to serve ‘Alee ibn al-Husayn’s best interests.Another reason for narrating the story was to show that as the Prophet ﷺ swore by Allah while being confident that He would enable for his oath to be fulfilled, al-Miswar swore by Allah that he would protect the sword while being confident that Allah would enable him to protect it.

The hadeeth shows that it is forbidden to harm the Prophet ﷺ in any form and by any means. It shows the keen interest of the Companions to keep the items of the Prophet ﷺ and utilize them to teach and educate people. .

3111
Narrated Ibn Al-Hanafiyyah: If `Alee had spoken anything bad about `Uthmaan, then he would have mentioned the day when some persons came to him and complained about the Zakat officials of `Uthmaan. `Alee then said to me, "Go to `Uthmaan and say to him, 'This document contains the regulations of spending the alms of Allah's Messenger so order your Zakat officials to act according to it." I took the document to `Uthmaan, who said, "Take it away, for we are not in need of it." I returned to `Alee with it and informed him of that. He said, "Put it back in theplace from where you took it."
.

Commentary : This hadeeth clarifies the lofty mannerisms and good conduct of the Companions (may Allah be pleased with them) and their endeavours to avoid abusing each other or discussing things that would violate the honour of others.The reason for narrating this hadeeth as mentioned by Ibn Abee Shaybah in his work al-Musannaf is that Muhammad Ibn al-Hanafiyyah, the son of ‘Alee (may Allah be pleased with him) - al-Hanafiyyah was his mother’s name -was sitting with some people,and some of them started defaming ‘Uthmaan ibn Affaan (may Allah be pleased with him).He forbade them from doing that, so they asked him, “Did your father ‘Alee ever curse ‘Uthmaan?” He told them that he never cursed him, and if he had ever cursed or mentioned anything bad about him once, he would have done so on the day when some people came to him complaining about the Zakat collectors of ‘Uthmaan, whowere entrusted with the duty of collecting Zakat from people.‘Alee(may Allah be pleased with him) gave a written note to his son Muhammad and ordered him to go out to ‘Uthmaan (may Allah be pleased with him) and inform him that it contained a statement about the areas of spending the wealth of Zakat, as specified by the Prophet ﷺ; hence he could command the zakat collectors from his workers to act upon what was in it. Muhammad stated: I brought it to ‘Uthmaan, and he said, “Keep it away from us,” meaning, ‘take it away from us; we do not need it.’ This is because he was aware of what was in it.It was also said that he had something similar,which he ordered his workers to act upon. It is also possible that the charges against his Zakat collectors were not fully established before ‘Uthmaan.Alternatively, they may have been established, but political expedience required delaying the reprimand or criticising them regarding desirable acts and not obligatory ones.
When Muhammad returned to his father (may Allah be pleased with him) and told him what ‘Uthmaan(may Allah be pleased with him) had said, he commanded him to put the note back in the place from which he had taken it. He did not say anything more than that and did not say anything bad about ‘Uthmaan(may Allah be pleased with him) because this was the habit of the honourable Companions, that they used to think well of each other.
From the benefits that we can concludefrom this hadeeth isthat we should advise the rulers and clarify what happens from their representatives. It also expounds the virtue of ‘Alee(may Allah be pleased with him)..

3115
Narrated Jaabir ibn `Abdullah Al-Ansaaree: A man amongst us begot a boy whom he named Al-Qaasim. On that the Ansaar said, (to the man), "We will never call you Aboo-al-Qaasim and will never please you with this blessed title." So, he went to the Prophet and said, "O Allah's Messenger ﷺ! I have begotten a boy whom I named Al-Qaasim and the Ansaar said, 'We will never call you Aboo-al-Qaasim, nor will we please you with this title.' " The Prophet ﷺ said, "The Ansaar have done well. Name by my name, but do not name by my Kunya, for I am Qaasim.".

Commentary : Allah guidedthe Ansaar and inspired them to engage in everything that would help, revere and protect the rights of the Prophet ﷺ. One example of that is mentioned in this hadeeth, wherein Jaabir ibn ‘Abdullah(may Allah be pleased with him)reports that a child was born to a man from the Ansaar. He named him al-Qaasim, as he wished hisKunya (teknonym)to be Aboo al-Qaasim.However,the Ansaar objected and told him, “We will not call you Aboo Al-Qaasim” because that is the Kunya of the Prophet ﷺ, and we will not let you take this honour and be given the same teknonym of the Prophet ﷺ. The man went to the Prophet ﷺ and told him what had happened.So,the Prophet ﷺ remarked, “The Ansaar did well,” meaning, in upholding the honour and reverence of the Prophetﷺ, by preventing anyone from sharing his Kunya. Then, he ﷺdirected them to the alternative, saying, “Feel free to name after my name, however, avoid using my Kunya.” In other words, give your sons the name of Muhammad, but avoid using my Kunya (i.e. Aboo al-Qaasim).After, he ﷺ explained the reason and the cause of having his own Kunya: “I am Qaasim (distributor),” meaning: I grant everyone what he deserves, and in the hadeeth of Aboo Hurayrah (may Allah be pleased with him), according to al-Bukhaaree, “I place wealth where I am commanded to place,” i.e. I do not give anyone or withhold from giving anyone except by the permission of Allah; hence, whom I give little, then that is due to the decree of Allah, and whom I give more, then that is also due to the decree of Allah.
As can be noted, the Prophet ﷺ forbade people combining his name and histekonym (Kunya),i.e.Muhammad, Aboo al-Qaasim. It was said: the prohibition is against using his Kunya, irrespective of whether one is called Muhammad or not.And it was said: This prohibition is specific to his time ﷺ.
The hadeethindicates the permissibility of naming children with the names of the prophets, and the prophets and their names are clear of what contains or entails evil..

3117
Aboo Hurayrah(may Allah be pleased with him): Allah's Messengerﷺ said, "Neither do I give you (anything) nor withhold (anything) from you, but I am just a distributor (i.e.Qaasim), and I give as I am ordered."
.

Commentary : The Prophet ﷺreminded the hearts of his Companions of Allah in all their active and inactive states and clarified to them that he did not do anything apart from the command of Allah.As part of that, he explained to them that Allah, the Glorified, is the one who legislated how the wealth of booty and spoils, and other things be distributed, and clarified the places of their distribution.He ﷺused to say when distributing wealth amongst them, “I do not give to you and withhold from you,” which carries the meaning: I do not give anyone amongst you because of my heart being inclined to him, neither do I withhold from giving anyone due to my heart’s disinterest from him, rather, everything is from Allah, the Exalted. In reality, Allah is the Giver and Withholder.I only give you according to what Allah facilitates for me and according to what He has legislated.
His statement, “I am a Qaasim (distributor),” carries the meaning:I distribute amongst you by the command of Allah and place everything in terms of withholding and giving where I have been commanded to.I do not give anyone or withhold from anyone except by the permission of Allah. Hence, whom I gave little, that was by the decree of Allah, and whom I gave more, that was also by the decree of Allah.
From the benefits of this hadeeth is that it establishes the divine decree and predestination, and belief in that and that there is no one to impede what Allah has given, and there is no giver for what Allah withholds. It sends the message thatpeople deal in the wealth rightly and wrongly, depending on their intentions, while the distribution among the people as per the way of the Messenger of Allah ﷺis done by what Allah divinely decided and by His decree and legal command.
This hadeethis a message to every distributor after the Prophet ﷺ to act like the Prophetﷺ such that he distributes the wealth according to the command of Allah, and not according to desires and other interests.
It shows that sustenance and wealth are a trust from Allah, entrusted to the people..

3118
Narrated Khawla Al-Ansaariyyah (may Allah be pleased with her): I heard Allah's Messengerﷺsaying, "Some people spend Allah's wealth in an unjust manner; such people will be put in the Hellfire on the Day of Resurrection."
.

Commentary : Allah, the Sublime, has made wealth a means for the people by which the interests of their religion and worldly livesare fulfilled.One is meant to earn his income from lawful sources and spend it in a lawful manner.
In this hadeeth, the Prophet ﷺ warned the Zakat collectors and other workersagainst managing the wealth of Allah that they are entrusted with wrongfully. This is applicable to all aspects of wealth, including itsaccumulation, earning through forbidden means, and spending it in the wrong places. The attribution of wealth to Allah is intended to refer tothe war spoils and booty and the public treasuries of Muslims, which Allah made for their interests. This warning is addressing the Zakat collectors, as well as the rulers who take from it wrongfully, thus taking more than what they deserve in comparison to their official duties, giving to those who are not deserving, or something else which is deemed wrong.The Prophet ﷺsaid that these people deserve the Fire on the Day of Judgement, unless they repent, thus returning the wrongfully usurped wealth to their rightful owners.His statement, “For them is …” is indicative of swift punishment and its intense closeness to those who wrongfully deal with the [public] wealth.
This hadeeth clarifies that public wealth that is made to serve the public interests of Muslimsis not a grazing ground for those whom Allah has entrusted with leadership over it because they will be held accountable about it on the Day of Judgment.
The hadeeth contains a deterrent to government officials and leaders from taking from the wealth of Allah anything wrongfully or withholding it from its rightful owners..

3121
Narrated Aboo Hurayrah (may Allah be pleased with him): Allah's Messengerﷺsaid, "When Kosrae is ruined, there will be noKosrae after him; and when Caesar is ruined, there will will be no Caesar after him. By Him in Whose Hands my life is, you will spend their treasures in Allah's Cause."
.

Commentary : This hadeeth contains a sign among the signs of the truthfulness of hisﷺ prophethood.The Prophetﷺ informed his Companions that no king wouldassume the leadership of the Persians after the death of Kosrae in Iraq.It has been said that this meant in other lands that were under the control of the Persians.Likewise, he stated that Hercules, the Caesar of Rome during that time, would be the last of the kings of the Romans in the Levant.Kosrae is the title of every king who ruled the Persians, and Caesar is the title of every king that ruled the Romans.What the Prophet ﷺforetoldhad already happened,i.e.the kingdom of Kosrae was torn apart after his death; likewise, the kingdom of Hercules.It went into retreat after his death until Allah granted the Muslims victory over their lands and the Muslims spent their treasures in the path of Allah, just as the Prophet ﷺ promised them, and upon which he ﷺ took an oath.
The context of this hadeeth is that the people of Quraysh used to go to the Levant and Iraq as traders.When they entered Islam, they feared the prevention of these journeys due to their entrance into Islam.In response, the Prophet ﷺmentioned to them this news tocalm them down and console their hearts, as it was a glad tiding to them that those kingdoms would vanish from those two vast territories.
This hadeeth may appear problematic knowing that when Kosrae died, his son became the king and thereafter a group took control, and the same happened with the Caesar. However, the fact that removes this problematic understanding is that both the Kosrae and Caesar ruled over a stable kingdom.When both vanished, their kingdom entered a state of instability and kept on moving towards destruction and extinction, and it was not their equivalents who assumed power.This is the same stating about a sick person that he is dead.It means that he is close to death and his circumstances are leading to it.
Allah encircled the kingdoms of the Persians and Romans after these kingdoms ruled a vast amount of lands before the advent of Islam.When Allah sent his Prophetﷺ with Islam, the words of the Almighty were realised concerning them: {Indeed, the earth belongs to Allah, he causes to inherit it whom He wills of His servants, and the [best] outcome is for the righteous.}[Quran 7: 128]..

3124
Narrated Aboo Hurayrah:The Prophetﷺ said, "One of Allah’sProphets carried out a military expedition.He said to his followers, 'Anyone who has married a woman and wants to consummate the marriage, and has not done so yet, should not accompany me; nor should a man who has built a house but has not completed its roof; nor a man who has sheep or she-camels and is waiting for the birth of their young ones.' So, the prophet carried out the expedition and when he reached that town at the time or nearly at the time of the `Asr prayer, he said to the sun, 'O sun! You are under Allah's Order, and I am under Allah's Order O Allah! Stop it (i.e. the sun) from setting.' It was stopped till Allah made him victorious. Then he collected the booty, and the fire came to burn it, but it did not burn it. He said (to his men), 'Some of you have stolen something from the booty. Let one man from every tribe give me a pledge of allegiance by shaking hands with me.' (They did so and) the hand of a man got stuck over the hand of their prophet. Thereupon, the prophet said (to the man), 'The theft has been committed by your people. So, all the persons of your tribe should give me the pledge of allegiance by shaking hands with me.' The hands of two or three men got stuck over the hand of their prophet and he said, "You have committed the theft.' Then they brought a head of gold like the head of a cow and put it there, and the fire came and consumed the booty. The Prophetﷺadded: Then Allah saw our weakness and disability, so he made booty permissible for us to have."
.

Commentary : Allah, the Sublime, singled out every nation with its own legislations and injunctions and supported every prophet with miracles that were compatible with their era and that enforced their prophethood. He specifically granted the nation of Prophet Muhammad ﷺmany favours in relation to their legislations and injunctions compared to other previous nations.
In this hadeeth, the Prophet ﷺrelates to usthe story of one of the previous prophets. It has been saiditwas Yoosha’ ibn Noon (peace be upon him), as mentioned by al-Haakim in al-Mustadrak.The Prophetﷺ related that this Prophet (peace be upon him) had set out to invade the city of Jericho in Palestine.However, he demanded that three kinds of men not partake in this war:
First,a man who entered a marital contract with a woman and became able to have sexual intercourse with her but did not have intercourse with her yet would mean his heart is most likely attached to her;therefore, his mind would be occupied with his wife and distracted fromfighting and obedience. Additionally, intercourse wouldlessen his strength.
Second,a man who built a house and did not yet put up its roof,i.e. he did not complete the construction of his houseorlive in it yet.
Third,a man who bought pregnant sheep or camels which had not yet given birth.
The apparent reason he excluded them from going out with him to war wasthattheir hearts would have been attached, and their minds occupied thinking of how to complete the unfinished business they had left behind. As such, they could have become distracted from the war.
On their way, they approached the village at the late afternoon (‘Asr) prayer, or close to that time. The fighting was on a Friday, and there remained a remnant of the disbelievers fighting.It was almost sunset, and the nightfall before Saturday was almost entering. Yoosha’ (peace be upon him) feared that they (his soldiers) would lose the morale to fight because it was not permissible for them to fight during Saturdays.So, he addressed the sun and said to it, “You are commanded” to set, whereas “I am commanded” to fight, so he called on Allah Almighty to restrain the sun, so it would not setuntil they had finished fighting.Allah answered his prayer, and it was stopped,i.e. it was returned backwards, or it stopped, or its movement slowed down until Allah helped them to conquer the village.Then he collected the spoils -the wealth obtained by the Muslims after subjugating the disbelievers in battle. At that time, Allah would send the fire to the acquired booty,so that the fire would devour it. However, it did not devour it, as the devouring by fire of the booty and its burning were a sign of acceptance and non-occurrence of embezzlement.After seeing this, their prophet said to them, “There is embezzlement amongst you.” Embezzlement entails taking the spoils wrongfully; it is a betrayal.For the Prophet, peace be upon him, to discover who had embezzled and stolen the spoils, he requested that from each tribe aselected man of them take an oath of allegiance, by greeting him with his hand, so that he would know in which tribe among them the theft had occurred. When they taking the oaths of allegiance, a man’s hand got stuck with his hand, and this was a sign of a betrayal that had occurred from this tribe.He informed him that embezzlement had occurred within this tribe, and thus he told him, “Let your tribe take an oath of allegiance to me,” individually.While they were pledging allegiance to him, the hands of two or three individuals stuck to his, thus he, peace be upon him, remarked, “Embezzlement is found in you,” meaning, ‘You embezzled the booty.’Hence, he demanded that they return what they had taken, “So, they came with a head like the head of a cow made of gold,” which they had taken out of the spoils, “And they placed it” with the rest of the spoils offered for burning. “Thereafter, a fire came and devoured it [the booty]” because now it had become a complete booty that was free of embezzlement, hence, Allah, the Glorified, accepted it.
After completing the story, the Prophet ﷺsaid that Allah Almighty singled out his nation by making lawful for them the spoils; due to their inability and weakness, as a mercy to them, and due to the honour of our Prophet ﷺ, while He, the Glorified, did not make it lawful for anyone else who was before them.People may end up fighting only for the spoils, due to a lack of sincerity, but within this Muslim Nation, there is a prevalence of sincerity.
In the prophetic expression “for us” is glorification, as the Prophet ﷺincluded his honourable soul with those of his nation; while in his saying, “Allah saw our inability and our weakness,” there is an indication of our reality in the sight of Allah as possessing inability and weakness before Him, the Exalted.
Among other benefits of this hadeeth, we can also conclude that the trials of this world call the soul towards panic, love for survival and fear of death..

3129
Narrated `Abdullah ibn Al-Zubayr:When Al-Zubayr got up during the Battle of the Camel, he called me and I stood up beside him, and he said to me, "O my son! Today one will be killed either as an oppressor or as an oppressed one. I see that I will be killed as an oppressed one. My biggest worry is my debts. Do you think, if we pay the debts, there will be something left for us from our money?" Al-Zubayr added, "O my son! Sell our property and pay my debts." Al-Zubayr then willed one-third of his property and willed one-third of that portion to his sons; namely, `Abdullah's sons. He said, "One-third of the one third. If any property is left after the payment of the debts, one-third (of the one-third of what is left) is to be given to your sons." (Hishaam, a sub-narrator added, "Some of the sons of `Abdullah were equal in age to the sons of Al-Zubayr e.g. Khubayb and `Abbaad. `Abdullah had nine sons and nine daughters at that time." (The narrator `Abdullah added:) My father (Al-Zubayr) went on drawing my attention to his debts saying, "If you should fail to pay part of the debts, appeal to my Master to help you." By Allah! I could not understand what he meant till I asked, "O father! Who is your Master?" He replied, "Allah (is my Master)." By Allah, whenever I had any difficulty regarding his debts, I would say, "O Master of Al-Zubayr! Pay his debts on his behalf ." and Allah would (help me to) pay it. Al-Zubayr was martyred leaving no Dinar or Dirham but two pieces of land, one of which was (called) Al-Ghaabah, and eleven houses in Al-Madeenah, two in the city of al-Basrah, one in the city of Koofah and one in Egypt. In fact, the source of the debt which he owed was, that if somebody brought some money to deposit with him. Al-Zubayr would say, "No, (I won't keep it as a trust), but I take it as a debt, for I am afraid it might be lost." Al-Zubayr was never appointed governor or collector of the tax of Kharaaj or any other similar job, but he collected his wealth (from the war booty he gained) during the battles he took part in, in the company of the Prophetﷺ, Aboo Bakr, `Umar, and `Uthmaan(may Allah be pleased with them). (`Abdullah ibn Al-Zubayr added:) When I counted his debt, it turned to be two million and two hundred thousand. (The sub-narrator added:) Hakeem ibn Hizaam met `Abdullah ibn Zubayr and asked, "O my nephew! How much is the debt of my brother?" `Abdullah kept it as a secret and said, "One hundred thousand," Hakeem said, "By Allah! I do not think your property will cover it." On that `Abdullah said to him, "What if it is two million and two hundred thousand?" Hakeem said, "I do not think you can pay it; so if you are unable to pay all of it, I will help you." Az- Zubayr had already bought Al-Ghaabah for one hundred and seventy thousand. `Abdullah sold it for one million and six hundred thousand. Then he called the people saying, "Any person who has any money claim on Al-Zubayr should come to us in Al-Ghaabah." There came to him `Abdullah ibn Ja`far whom Al-Zubayr owed four hundred thousand. He said to `Abdullah ibn Al-Zubayr, "If you wish I will forgive you the debt." `Abdullah (ibn Al-Zubayr) said, "No." Then Ibn Ja`far said, "If you wish you can defer the payment if you should defer the payment of any debt." Ibn Al-Zubayr said, "No." `Abdullah ibn Ja`far said, "Give me a piece of the land." `Abdullah ibn Al-Zubayr said (to him), "Yours is the land extending from this place to this place." So, `Abdullah ibn Al-Zubayr sold some of the property (including the houses) and paid his debt perfectly, retaining four and a half shares from the land (i.e. Al-Ghaabah). He then went to Mu'aawiyyah while `Amr ibn `Uthmaan, Al-Munthir ibn Az- Zubayr and Ibn Zam`ah were sitting with him. Mu'aawiyyah asked, "At what price have you appraised Al- Ghaabah?" He said, "One hundred thousand for each share," Mu’aawiyyah asked, "How many shares have been left?" `Abdullah replied, "Four and a half shares." Al-Munthir ibn Al-Zubayr said, "I would like to buy one share for one hundred thousand." `Amr ibn `Uthmaan said, "I would like to buy one share for one hundred thousand." Ibn Zam`ah said, "I would like to buy one share for one hundred thousand." Mu’aawiyyah said, "How much is left now?" `Abdullah replied, "One share and a half." Mu’aawiyyah said, "I would like to buy it for one hundred and fifty thousand." `Abdullah also sold his part to Mu’aawiyyah six hundred thousand. When Ibn Al-Zubayr had paid all the debts. Al-Zubayr's sons said to him, "Distribute our inheritance among us." He said, "No, by Allah, I will not distribute it among you till I announce in four successive Hajj seasons, 'Would those who have money claims on Al-Zubayr come so that we may pay them their debt." So, he started to announce that in public in every Hajj season, and when four years had elapsed, he distributed the inheritance among the inheritors. Al-Zubayr had four wives, and after the one-third of his property was excluded (according to the will), each of his wives received one million and two hundred thousand. The total amount of his property was fifty million and two hundred thousand..

Commentary : The Companions(may Allah be pleased with them)would always put their trust in Allah as He ought to be relied upon in all aspects of their lives, and this was evident in their submitting of their affairs to Allah Almighty and not fearing poverty.They would take from the world what Allah had decreed for them with a contented soul without squabbling over it, and there was a blessing in their lives.
In this hadeeth, Abdullah ibnAl-Zubayr reports a conversation that occurred between him and his father, when Al-Zubayribn al-’Awwaam(may Allah be pleased with him) took his position during the Battle of the Camel (whichconsisted ofAl-Zubayribn al-’Awwaam and Talhah ibn ‘Ubaydullah(may Allah be pleased with them)and those who were with them on one side, while ‘Alee ibn Abee Taalib (may Allah be pleased with him)and his companions were on the other;it occurred at the gate of Basra 36 years after the murder of ‘Uthmaan (may Allah be pleased with him)).Al-Zubayribn Al-‘Awwaam called his son ‘Abdullahand told him that either an oppressor or an oppressed would be killed that day in battle. He said that because both parties were acting upon their respective interpretations, he told him that he thought he would be killed that day unjustly.Perhaps that was because he did not intend to fight. He wanted to instruct his son to pay off his debts, and he informed him that the greatest of his concern was these debts.He thought that his debts would not leave anything of his wealth. His concern was valid because his debt was solarge that he feared it might not be repaid. For that reason, he asked ‘Abdullah to sell his assets and property andthereby pay off his debts.Then, he bequeathed one-third of his wealth in absolute terms, then a third of one-third to the sons of ‘Abdullah ibnAl-Zubayr specifically.The sons of ‘Abdullah ibn Al-Zubayr were of the same age as the children of Al-Zubayr, buthe singled out Abdullah's children alone because they increased in number.Khubayb and ‘Abbaad were the two sons of ‘Abdullah ibnAl-Zubayr, and there were no other children besides them in those days;at the same time,Al-Zubayr had nine boys and nine girls on the day of his bequest.Al-Zubayr began instructing his son ‘Abdullah to pay off his debts first by saying, “My son, if you should fail to pay part of the debts, appeal to my Master to help you.”‘Abdullah did not know what Al-Zubayr meant by his master, so he asked him, “My dear father! Who is your master?” He replied, “Allah.”This statement emanates from his complete submission to Allah and reliance on Him, and having trust in Him, the Glorified. He was his Master, his Helper, and his Assister in his life and after his death. As such, ‘Abdullah ibnAl-Zubayr swore by Allah that whenever he fell into distress whilst repaying the debts, he sought Allah’s help and said: “O Master of Al-Zubayr, repay for him his debts,” and He would pay off his debts, meaning Allah, in positive response to his supplication.
What Al-Zubayr expected happened.He was killed in this battle, but he died while he had not left behind any dinar or dirham, rather he had left two lands, one of which was al-Ghaabah, a vast area of land in hilly areas of al-Madeenah, eleven houses in al-Madeenah, two houses in al-Basrah, a house in al-Koofah, and a house in Egypt, and these estates were sold to pay off Al-Zubayr's debts.
‘Abdullah ibnAl-Zubayr mentions the cause of his father's debts.He recalled that a man would come to him with his wealth and would give it to him for safe-keeping and as a trust kept with him.But Al-Zubayr would say, “I will not accept it as a deposit; instead, I will take it as a liable loan,”in case he were to lose it, as this would grant more confidence to the owner of the wealth, and better protect the chivalry of Al-Zubayr(may Allah be pleased with him).
Then, ‘Abdullah went on to mention the source of his father's wealth.Al-Zubayr(may Allah be pleased with him) never became a ruler, nor did he collect taxes, or anything that would be a reason for collecting money.He meant by this to explain that the large amount of his wealth was not attained from thosesources concerning which people are perceived negatively. He clarified that most of the wealth that he acquired was from his share in thewar spoils that he gathered after every battle in which accompanied the Prophet ﷺ, or partook with Aboo Bakr, ‘Umar, and ‘Uthmaan, (may Allah be pleased with them). In other words, the source of his wealth was from war spoils and booty, and what the Prophet ﷺ had bestowed upon him.Thus, Allah granted him blessing in his wealth due to its good origin.
Afterward, his son ‘Abdullah counted what he owed of debt and found it to be two thousand multiplied by a thousand and two hundred thousand, meaning: two million and two hundred thousand dirhams. Hakeem ibn Hizaam met ‘Abdullah ibnAl-Zubayr and asked him, “How much debt does your father owe?”He concealed the total amount of the debt from him, and he replied that the debt was one hundred thousand; he did not lie in his words, as it does not negate an excess of the hundred [thousand].He was truthful in some, while he concealed the other amount. It was said: He only said to him: “One hundred thousand” and concealed the rest, lest Hakeem ibn Hizaam would think negativelyabout Al-Zubayr due to the large amount hehad borrowed, or thinkhe lacked firmness, orthat ‘Abdullah would fail to repay the debt. In these ways he could end up perceivingthat he was a person in need. However, Hakeem said, “By Allah, I do not perceive that your wealth will be enough for this debt.”So ‘Abdullah revealed the full amount to him, saying, “Tell me what you think if the debt amountedto two million and two hundred thousand.” When ‘Abdullah saw that Hakeem had perceived the issue of one hundred thousand to be a huge amount, he was compelled to disclose to him of all the debts, and let him know that he was able to repay them. However, Hakeem replied, “I do not see you all being able to repay this amount, so if you cannot handle part of it, then feel free to request assistance from me.”
 ‘Abdullah managed to sell al-Ghaabah for one million and six hundred thousand dirhams. So he proclaimed among the people, “If anyone has a financial right due on Al-Zubayr, then let him come to us at al-Ghaabah.”‘Abdullah ibn Ja’far ibn Abee Taalib(may Allah be pleased with him) came to him as he had lent four hundred thousand to Al-Zubayr, and he said to Abdullah ibn al-Al-Zubayr, “If you wish, I can forsake the claim in support of you out of generosity and grace, so I will not claim back my debt.” ‘Abdullah ibn Al-Zubayr replied, “Do not forsake your debt.” Ibn Ja’far said, “If you wish, you can place it with that amount that you will repay later, if you are going to delay the repayments.”He was suggesting to be placedat the end of the list of people who were due repayment.‘Abdullah replied, “Do not suggest delays.” Ibn Ja’far answered, “In that case, cut for me a portion of the land to repay my debt.”Ibn Al-Zubayr estimated perfectly for him the land, and he sold part of al-Ghaabah and some houses that were not part of al-Ghaabah, and he was able to repay his father’s debt.
He repaid him in full, and there were four and half portions left unsold of al-Ghaabah.Afterwards, ‘Abdullah ibn al-Zubayr came to Mu’aawiyah ibn Abee Sufyaan in Damascus.‘Amr ibn ‘Uthmaan ibn ‘Affaan, his brother al-Munthiribn al-Zubayr ibn al-‘Awwaam, and Ibn Zam’ah were with him.Mu’aawiyah asked, “At how much was al-Ghaabah estimated?”He answered him, “Every portion out of the original sixteen portions was estimated at one hundred thousand.”He asked, “How many portions are left?”He answered, “Four and half portions.”Al-Munthir ibn al-Zubayr said, “I have bought one portion for one hundred thousand.”‘Amr ibn ‘Uthmaan said, “I have taken one portion for one hundred thousand.” Ibn Zam’ah said, “I have bought a portion for one hundred thousand.”Then Mu’aawiyah asked, “Now how much is left?”He answered, “One and half portions.”He said, “I have taken it for one hundred and fifty thousand.”After every creditor had received his financial due, ‘Abdullah ibn Ja’far sold his share to Mu’aawiyah for six hundred thousand, making a profit of two hundred thousand.
Once Ibn al-Zubayr had completed repaying the debts of his father, the children of al-Zubayr told him, “Now, divide between us our inheritance.”However, ‘Abdullah said, “By Allah, I will not distribute the inheritance between you yet, until I proclaim during the Hajj season for four years,“Attention everyone!If anyone is owed by al-Zubayr any money, let him come to us, we will repay his debt.”This does not entail stopping the rightful inheritor from getting his right,which is the distributed portion and the ability to transact in his portion.That is because ‘Abdullah ibn al-Zubayr was a custodian of the estates of al-Zubayr, and he dealt with what was in the interests of paying off the debts first.He assumed that there was a possibility of having remaining debts, whereas distribution to the inheritors only happens after paying off all debts due on the deceased.
The reason he singled out the proclamation for the period of four years is that most likely the distance between Makkah and other distant lands can be travelled during that period in two years, and he intended for the news to reach all parts of the territory and return to him, so he could thereby be assured that he had absolved himself from the responsibility of his father.
He kept on proclaiming every year during the Hajj season, when people from all the corners of the Islamic State assemble, “Attention everyone!Whoever is owed by al-Zubayr anything, please come to us and we will pay off what he is owed.”When four years passed, he distributed the inheritance between them.Al-Zubayr had four wives when he died; they were, Umm Khaalid, al-Rabaab, Zaynab, and ‘Aatikah bint Zayd. ‘Abdullah removed the third portion of the remaining bequeathed wealth which al-Zubayr had bequeathed for the poor people.Every wife got one million two hundred thousand. The total of his remaining wealth was five million and two hundred thousand.
This hadeeth shows that it was among the guidance of the Companions (may Allah be pleased with them) to bequeath at times of war, and to bequeath for the grandsons if there are those inheritors who would legally prevent the inheritance from reaching them.
It also shows that it is permissible to delay the distribution of inheritance until all the debts of the deceased are repaid and his bequests are fully executed.
The hadeeth shows that it is part of the guidance of the Companions(may Allah be pleased with them) for the inheritor as well as the executor [if he wishes] to buy from the left-behind estates if theyare sold.
Italso shows the generosity of ‘Abdullah ibn Ja’far, hence, he was known as the ‘sea of generosity’ and it expounds the virtue and grace of both Ja’far and Hakeem ibn Hizaam.
The hadeeth contains a prohibition from being in debt for the one who cannot repay it or wouldspend it wrongly.
It was part of the guidance of the Companions to proclaim concerning the debts of the one known to have taken loans, and that the proclamation should occur during important seasons, as they are the main assemblies of the people.
The hadeeth motivates and inspires us to have firm trust in and reliance on Allah, the Mighty and Majestic.
It also expounds the blessings of Allah, the Glorified, for the holy warrior and the one striving in His path in his wealth during his lifetime and death..

3134
Narrated Ibn `Umar (may Allah be pleased with him): Allah's Messengerﷺsent a militant mission (Sariyyah)towards Najd - and `Abdullah ibn `Umar was in this expedition. They gained a great number of camels as war booty. The share of each one of them was twelve or eleven camels, and they were given an extra camel each..

Commentary : The spoils of war arecounted and then distributed among the soldiers who have participated in the fight. The person who has the authority to distribute the spoils is the commander of the militaryoperation or the one whom hedelegates for this responsibility.
In this hadeeth, ‘Abdullah ibn ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him) narrates that the Prophet ﷺ sent an expeditiontowards Najd, which is a regionlocated in the middle of the Arabian Peninsula. This expedition is referred to in the hadeeth as Sariyyah, which is a division from the army that consists of no more than four hundred fighters, and ‘Abdullah ibn ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him) was a participant in this one.He reports that they acquired many camels and that the share of each one of them was eleven or twelve camels.The commander of the army gave everyone amongst them their share and granted them an extra camel from the spoils before their division. In a narration in Saheeh Muslim, it reads, “The Messenger of Allah gave us each an extra camel.”This extra share is called in Arabic Anfaal, and they are gifts from the spoils other than the share that is due to be divided so that he gave each one an extra amount above his share.That is because they did well in their fight; giving an additional amount is only for the one who does well in the war.
The reconciliation of the meaning between the two narrations - where in one it says the commander of the expedition was the one who gave them an extra reward from the spoils, and in the other that the Prophet ﷺ was the one who gave them above their allocated share - is that the commander of the expedition gave an extra reward from the spoils, while the Messenger of Allah ﷺ permitted him to so; thus it is allowed to attribute this act to each one of them in that respect.
Frome the benefits of this hadeeth is learning that ifa division from the army acquires spoils during the time it was separated from the army, then the acquired spoils are to be shared with the rest of the army.However, if it encamps in one town while the rest of the army is stationed in a different town, then it exclusively receives the spoils without sharing it with them.
This hadeeth establishesthe legitimacy of giving extra rewards from the spoils in order to motivate the fighters to do well in war..

3135
Narrated Ibn `Umar(may Allah be pleased with him): Allah's Messengerﷺused to give an extra share to some of the members of the Sariyyah he used to send, in addition to the shares they shared with the army in general.
.

Commentary : An-Nafl is the name given to the additional amount the ruler gives to some soldiers above the share of spoils they are entitled to receive, based on obtaining an interest that he perceives.
In this hadeeth, ‘Abdullah ibn ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him) reports that the Prophet ﷺ used to send a Sariyyah – which is a division of the army that does not exceed four hundred in number - and he ﷺ used to give to some of the soldiers of these military units gifts that were exclusive for them, besides the spoils that were distributed to the whole army in general. They would obtain their common share and the specifically rewarded additional share from the Messenger of Allah ﷺ.This was for wisdom and different reasons, such as if a man was particularly offensive against the enemy, or he ascended a fortress and opened it to the Muslims until they overtook it, or he attacked the leader of the enemy’s army and killed him, thus managing thereby to defeat the enemy.The Righteous Caliphs used to do that as well.It was said that he ﷺ used to give the Nafl from the Khums (one-fifth of the entire booty).
This hadeeth shows that it is permissible to take into account the people of power and strength in war and to exclusively allocate them a gift in excess of others..

3136
Narrated Aboo Moosa (may Allah be pleased with him): We got the news of the migration of the Prophetﷺwhile we were in Yemen, so we set out migrating to him. We were, I and my two brothers, I being the youngest, and one of my brothers was Aboo Burdah and the other was Aboo Ruhm. We were over fifty (or fifty-three or fifty -two) men from our people. We got on board a ship which took us to the Negus ofAbyssinia, and there we found Ja`far ibn Abee Taalib and his companions with al-Najaaishee. Ja`far said (to us), "Allah's Messengerﷺhas sent us here and ordered us to stay here, so you too, stay with us." We stayed with him till we all left (Ethiopia) and met the Prophetﷺat the time when he had conquered Khaybar. He gave us a share from its booty (or gave us from its booty). He gave only to those who had taken part in the Battle with him. but he did not give any share to any person who had not participated in Khaybar's conquest except the people of our ship, besides Ja`far and his companions, whom he gave a share as he did them (i.e. the people of the ship).
.

Commentary : The Prophet ﷺ had ordered some of his Companions to migrate to Abyssinia to escape in the interest of their religion and lives from the harm of the polytheists in Makkah. He ﷺ chose Abyssinia as a place to migrate to because its king, the Negus, was a just man, and among those who emigrated to it was Ja’far Ibn Abee Taalib (may Allah be pleased with him).That was before Allah ordered the Muslims to emigrate to al-Madeenah.
In this hadeeth, Aboo Moosaa al-Ash’aree (may Allah be pleased with him) reports that while he was in Yemen, he heard about the mission and migration of the Prophet ﷺ to al-Madeenah. He and others wanted to migrate to him in al-Madeenah, that is, he and his brothers Aboo Ruhm and Aboo Burdah, and with them, there were another fifty-two or fifty-three men from their people who had already reverted to Islam.When they boarded the ship from Yemen to reach Makkah, they were dropped off at Abyssinia, where they met Ja’far ibn Abee Taalib (may Allah be pleased with him) and those who were with him among the Muslim immigrants. They remained with them there until they all came to al-Madeenahafter the conquest of Khaybar in the seventh year of the migration.Khaybar was a town inhabited by Jews at a distance of 153 km from al-Madeenah.I was located to the north on the road to the Levant (al-Shaam).When they came, the Prophet ﷺ allocated for them their shares and gave them a portion of the booty acquired from the conquest of Khaybar. That was after he consulted with the campaigning Muslims concerning them, and they agreed, as the narration of al-Bayhaqee portrays.He did not grant anyone who had not witnessed the invasionanything except the passengers of the ship, namely Ja’far ibn Abee Taalib (may Allah be pleased with him) and those who were with him from among the emigrants from Makkah, and Aboo Moosa al-Ash’aree (may Allah be pleased with him) and those who had emigrated with him from amongst his people to Abyssinia.
This hadeeth expounds the merit and status of the early emigrants - such as Ja'far ibn Abee Taalib and Aboo Moosaa al-Ash'aree and those who were with them –and how they enjoyed two emigrations.
It shows that the ruler has the right to dispose of the wealth gained from the spoils and to exclusively allocate a part of it to the deputies of the Muslims and to those who have lost their wealth, as he ﷺgave to the people of the ship.
Itshows the suffering that the early Muslims endured with the Prophet ﷺ until they managed to convey the call of Allah to the people..

1591
Fadālah ibn ‘Ubayd reported: We were with the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) on the Day of Khaybar, making deals with the Jews with the Wuqiyyah of gold for two or three dinars, whereupon the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) said: Do not sell gold for gold except weight for weight..

Commentary : Riba (usury) is one of the types of exploitation in transactions. It entails great harm and involves unlawful earnings and taking extra money wrongfully. Therefore, it has been prohibited in all the laws that have been revealed. Riba al-Fadl (usury of surplus) is one of the types of Riba, and it means selling an item that is subject to Riba rulings for another of the same type with excess in one of the two, like selling a gold dinar for two dinars and a silver dirham for two dirhams.
In this Hadīth, Fadālah ibn ‘Ubayd (may Allah be pleased with him) narrates that they were with the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) in the Battle of Khaybar in 7 AH. They were making deals with the Jews and buying from them one Wuqiyyah of gold worth forty silver dirhams for "two or three dinars", and the dinar was equal to 12 dirhams. It could mean they were selling one' Uqiyyah of gold, beads, and others for two or three dinars. It is known that this amount of pure gold is not to be sold for two or three dinars, and this was the reason why the Companions made such a transaction, as they thought it was permissible because the gold was mixed with other things. However, the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) forbade them from selling gold for gold "except weight for weight," i.e., each must be equal to the other in terms of weight without any addition or surplus.
The Hadīth highlights the prohibition of Riba al-Fadl (usury of surplus)..

1592
Ma‘mar ibn ‘Abdullah reported: That he sent his servant with one Sā‘ of wheat and said to him: Sell it then buy with it barley. The servant went and took one Sā‘ and part of a Sā‘. When he came to Ma‘mar, he informed him of that, whereupon, Ma‘mar said to him: Why did you do that?! Go ahead and return it and do not take except like for like, as I used to hear the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) say: Food for food, like for like. He said: Our food at that time was barley. It was said to him: It is not like it. He said: I am afraid that it could be similar..

Commentary : Riba (usury) is one of the types of exploitation in transactions. It entails great harm and involves unlawful earnings and taking extra money wrongfully. Therefore, it has been prohibited in all the laws that have been revealed. Riba al-Fadl (usury of surplus) is one of the types of Riba, and it means selling an item that is subject to Riba rulings for another of the same type with excess in one of the two, like selling a Sā‘ of wheat for two Sā‘s thereof, or one hundred grams of gold for one hundred and ten grams thereof.
In this Hadīth, Ma‘mar ibn ‘Abdullah ibn Nadlah (may Allah be pleased with him) narrates that he sent his servant with one Sā‘ of wheat and ordered him to sell it for cash, i.e., for dirhams and dinars, then buy barley with its price. The boy went and bought one Sā‘ of barley and part of a Sā in return for the wheat directly without selling the wheat first and then buying the barley with its price. Perhaps he did that because buying barley was the goal and it was achieved by this.
When the servant returned to Ma‘mar, he informed him of what he had done, i.e., selling one Sā‘ of wheat for one Sā‘ and more of barley. Ma‘mar asked him: Why did you do that?! This is an objecting question. Then, he ordered him to return and bring back the wheat and return the barley and not to take the barley from him except like for like in terms of weight. Then, he clarified to him the reason for returning the extra barley, as he heard the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) say: "Food for food," i.e., when selling one of them for another, it should be "like for like," i.e., in terms of weight and amount without any addition or surplus, and the two foods here refer to those of the same type, as it was mentioned in a version in Sahīh Muslim Collection that the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) said: "If these classes differ, sell as you wish as long as payment is made hand to hand."
Ma‘mar (may Allah be pleased with him) said: "Our food at that time was barley," i.e., it was the staple food during the time of the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him). Some of those who were present objected that barley and wheat are not of the same type, i.e., wheat and barley are two different types, therefore, surplus between them is not unlawful. Ma‘mar (may Allah be pleased with him) said: "I am afraid that it could be similar," i.e., a similar case. In other words, he was afraid it was included among the similar types and, thus, should have the same ruling of the prohibition of Riba since wheat and barley are close and each of them is called food. He (may Allah be pleased with him) did this out of religious prudence and as a precautionary measure.
The Hadīth highlights the prohibition of Riba al-Fadl (usury of surplus).
It shows how the Companions were cautious not to fall into committing what is unlawful..

1594
Abu Nadrah reported: I asked Ibn' Abbās about Sarf (currency exchange), and he said: Is it hand to hand? I said: Yes. He said: There is no harm in it. I informed Abu Sa‘īd about it, saying: I asked Ibn' Abbās about Sarf, and he said: Is it hand to hand? I said: Yes. He said: There is no harm in it. He said: Did he say that?! We will write to him not to give you this Fatwa (legal opinion). He said: By Allah, some of the boys of the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) brought dry dates, but he rejected them and said: It seems those are not from the dry dates of our land. He said: This year, there was something wrong with the dry dates of our land - or with our dry dates - so I took that and made some addition, whereupon he said: You made an addition! You committed Riba (usury)! Do not approach this. If you have doubts about your dry dates, sell them and then buy the dry dates you like..

Commentary : Riba (usury) is one of the gravest major sins. The Shariah has forbidden all sales that involve a possibility of Riba and has permitted lawful sales that are free of Riba. The pre-Islamic era of ignorance was swarming with Riba-based sales, so Islam rectified and refined such sale transactions.
In this Hadīth, the Tābi‘i Abu Nadrah al-Mundhir ibn Mālik al-‘Abdi narrates that he asked the Companion ‘Abdullah ibn ‘Abbās (may Allah be pleased with him and his father) about Sarf, which is selling an item for another of the same type with a surplus and an addition in the taken or given item, like selling a dinar for two dinars or a dirham for two dirhams; whether it is a Riba-based sale or not. Ibn ‘Abbās answered by saying that it is not Riba in case it is exchanged hand to hand, i.e., at the time that the act of selling took place. Ibn ‘Abbās (may Allah be pleased with him and his father) did not deem selling an item for another of the same type with a surplus Riba, and he believed that Riba is not unlawful except in case of a deferred payment.
So, Abu Nadrah informed Abu Sa‘īd al-Khudri (may Allah be pleased with him) about the Fatwa of Ibn ‘Abbās, whereupon Abu Sa‘īd (may Allah be pleased with him) told him that he would write to Ibn ‘Abbās not to give such a Fatwa and would review it with him, clarify the truth, and advise him. Then, Abu Sa‘īd (may Allah be pleased with him) narrated his supporting reference and evidence in forbidding the Riba of surplus and addition. He swore and said: "By Allah, some of the boys of the Messenger of Allah (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him)," who are the servants, "brought dry dates, but he rejected them," the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) rejected them because they were not from the dry dates produced by their land and not the ones known among them. It was said to the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him): This year, the dry dates of Madīnah were of bad quality. So, the servant took some of the bad dry dates and exchanged them for others and brought those good dry dates to the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) in return for the defective ones and gave the buyer an excess in the weight and amount of the defective dry dates. Thereupon, the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) said: "You made an addition! You committed Riba (usury)! Do not approach this," i.e., what you did and the addition you made in the weight is from Riba. So, the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) forbade him from eating from the dry dates he had brought. Then, the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) said to him by way of teaching: "If you find some doubt about your dry dates, sell them and then buy the dry dates you like," thus, the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) forbade him from taking dry dates for dry dates. So, if there was something wrong with his dry dates, he should first sell them for money, then buy with that money whatever he liked of the dry dates, and there should be no surplus between the two.
It seems that Ibn ‘Abbās gave that Fatwa of permissibility based on the apparent indication of the Prophet's statement mentioned in the two Sahīh Collections: "Riba is only in Nasī’ah (deferred payment)." This apparently indicates exclusiveness, as if he said: There is no Riba except in the deferred payment. However, there is a report in the Sahīh Muslim Collection indicating that Ibn ‘Abbās reconsidered his stance regarding his Fatwa, as Abu as-Sahbā’ narrated: "That he asked Ibn ‘Abbās about it in Makkah, and he disliked it," i.e., he disliked the permissibility of surplus in Sarf.
The Hadīth highlights the prohibition of Riba al-Fadl (usury of surplus).
It indicates the invalidity of the transaction that involves Riba.
It highlights the fact that the Shariah rulings are to be sought only through the Qur‘an and the Sunnah.
It shows how the Companions used to correct each other whenever they made a mistake..