The ruling on appointing someone to conduct Khul’ on behalf of the spouse: The scholars are in consensus that it is permissible for the spouse to appoint someone to carry out the Khul’. The consensus was transmitted by Muafiq al-Deen Ibn Qudaamah, Abu al-Faraj Shams al-Deen Ibn Quddamah, and Burhaan al-Deen Ibn Mufleh.

2. The husband’s approval of Khul’ is conditional: The scholars differed regarding the ruling of making the husband’s approval of the khul’ subject to a condition. The majority of scholars hold the view that it is valid for the husband to suspend khul’ upon a condition, which is the opinion of the majority of the scholars: Hanafi, Maliki, and Shafi’i Madhabs. The other group of scholars hold the view that it is invalid, which is the view of the Hanbali Madhab. [172] According to the Hanbali Madhab, in the event of where the condition stipulated in the Khul’ was to return or giving the option about it, then Khul’ is deemed valid while the condition is deemed invalid.